Category: Organized Labor

The Real Tim Ballard: Is it all just a CIA case of misdirection

It is lazy to just mindlessly trust anything, especially authority figures, and I was wondering while watching the new very good movie, The Sound of Freedom, how the real-life Tim Ballard did it, blending in with the cartels to act like one of them so that trust could be earned to break open the pedophile rings of modern slavery that are so much a modern problem.  You’re hanging around drug dealers and the scum of the earth, and you are trying to win them over.  There would be no way to pull it off being straight as an arrow; otherwise, they would never trust you.  You’d have to show an interest in kids and pretend to be attracted to them, which Tim Ballard had to do at the beginning of the film when he was trying to get into the mind of a significant pedophile consumer.  The movie lightly touched on that kind of life and focused excessively on the Christian side of reality.  It purposely made Tim Ballard into a hero and glorified his efforts almost to the point of a John Wayne movie.  I personally enjoyed the results.  I wanted to see a hero.  I wanted to see someone who was so firm in their convictions that it could make the tough subject matter of the movie go down easier.  But I’ll have to admit; I had doubts that Tim Ballard’s life was so heroic.  He’s likely had to see and do many things that are very embarrassing to gain the trust of the world’s scum bags.  And I’m sure those things didn’t feel very heroic to him.  But would we ever catch any of these people if he didn’t do those things? 

I gave Sound of Freedom a great review; I think it was a top-notch movie, and it’s worth seeing, for the subject matter was very serious.  But I’m also proud of many people who have let me know that there is a serious possibility that this entire movie has been a CIA operation to attempt to restore their tarnished brand with the targeted religious right.  And it would be a common trick by those types of intelligence agencies to hide much more serious crimes behind misdirection efforts.  After all, the criminals in Sound of Freedom are nobody, dime-a-dozen scum bags from Columbia and Mexico.  Nobody will miss them if they are arrested and thrown in jail forever or killed in a gun fight upon arrest.  The sex trafficking of children would continue, and life would continue as we know it.  And that was the entire point of the Tim Ballard true story, to show how deep undercover and into the danger zone he was willing to go to save a couple of kids from that terrible life.  But people have been quick to point out that the money trail does trace back to Clinton supporters and that when the CIA asked Tim Ballard to become part of Homeland Security to take on this human trafficking role because he was a person of faith and they felt that would give him a lifeline out, and back to reality without falling apart, its entirely possible this is the kind of chess game they had in mind all along.  That the story Sound of Freedom would give the religious right some red meat and hope it appeases them and makes them go back to sleep.  Because the actual crimes were in the Beltway among the rich and famous.  The Hollywood culture that likes to consume adrenochrome for its pursuits of immortal life, their own Epic of Gilgamesh in Beverly Hills.

In that regard, The Sound of Freedom played it very safe.  The bad guys were terrible, and everyone could agree on who they were.  And the entire movie was about chasing down a few of those types of people to the ends of the earth.  But it didn’t deal with John Podesta’s Pizzagate controversy and the high-end user debacles of Epstein Island that are undoubtedly major problems in the news, and to what role the CIA plays in feeding this criminal network, just as they have been caught doing with the illegal drug network.  The cartels have risen to fill a market need.  So why is there a market need?  Sound of Freedom points out the problem in a way that essentially says, “hey, look over there, at those bad people deep in the rebel-held territory of Columbia.  But don’t look at the safe house in Washington D.C. that is feeding these kids to consumers in Chevy Chase, Maryland, while dad sneaks away from the home, telling the family he’s working late.  But what he’s really trying to do is have sex with kids hoping to psychologically turn back the clock before he has made a bunch of unforgivable mistakes in life.”  And then how do intelligence agencies and corporations use such compromised people to gain power in the world through extortion?  Some huge questions in Sound of Freedom are deliberately pushed off to the side for narrative convenience.  If the movie did tackle those topics, it would likely be very depressing, and it would be hard to justify the price of a ticket. 

I personally think the CIA uses people like Tim for just these kinds of purposes.  And the role that Angel Studios plays in the distribution of this movie I think is sincere.  I love The Chosen and think the family who set up that studio are good people trying to do good things for all the right reasons.  But are they all being used to contain the message of child trafficking to acceptable limits determined by the CIA?  Well, probably.  This is a story that props up government efforts against sex trafficking and makes you want to cheer on the good guys punishing the bad guys.  But it’s pretty safe in the stereotypes.  The CIA has no problem throwing a few lowlifes under the bus for their own preservation.  And I’m glad people are talking about the Sound of Freedom in such an “awake” way.  It’s good to be skeptical.  And it’s good to question Tim Ballard’s and his wife’s integrity.  I want to believe there are people like him in the world and that we aren’t all being played for suckers.  But experience says that such people don’t exist.  Either way, The Sound of Freedom is a movie worth telling to an audience that needs to hear it.  But trust in government and government workers in Homeland Security and the CIA is a bridge too far.  There is a lot more evil going on in the world besides the terrible circumstances of this movie.  And when the CIA starts standing for good in the hard cases and busting the rich and famous on moral grounds of right and wrong, we can have a different conversation.  But as of now, we must scrutinize everyone because institutionalism tends to corrupt everything it touches, even the good people who work within it with an “ends justify the means” mentality.  Playing nice with the bad guys usually means doing bad things too.  And that’s not something to celebrate.  It’s something to punish. 

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

It’s Not the Fault of Indiana Jones: Disney listened to BlackRock and they’ll never recover

Indiana Jones is a great movie, but Disney mismanaged it by listening to the wrong people

One of the reasons I do these articles on this blog is because people are hungry for real information. Not the kind that the media has grown to give us, usually laced as propaganda to fulfill some NWO vision of centralized control using the China model of communism to determine reality. And there is something really menacing looming behind the various box office results that I say all the time are the ways that people vote for value in our culture. The Sound of Freedom movie is a category by itself, and as far as I’m concerned, there’s room for all these great movies that are suddenly coming out. But the way that the communist left has gained control of the marketplace is by placing the number 1 weekly horse race to movies, all in an effort to make or break their box office results. It’s a baked-in trick by the World Economic Forum types and their media apparatus to pick winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas with the illusion of industry reporting. And I say that as a guy who has read The Hollywood Reporter for three decades. I used to get the magazine version of that publication as an industry guide of great value. So I am quite aware of the switch to this new way of manipulating numbers to tell the kind of story that the financial controllers of communist activism want to tell. And a target early on was the new Indiana Jones movie, The Dial of Destiny. The WEF types wanted to see Disney kill off one of the great American heroes from the 1980s. Early screenings showed that the public didn’t like that. So Disney had to scramble to give the public the ending they wanted, which went against the desires of the BlackRocks of the world. And as a result, Bob Iger and the gang at Disney found themselves between a rock and a hard place with snakes and spikes in between to kill them with a thousand cuts.

See the problem. Even with inflation, this cost structure is ridiculous and not sustainable.

When I look at the box office numbers for Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, I see a pretty good movie that performs well day to day, even on weekdays. It’s consistently good with the other movies that were done in the 1980s, back in a time when those movies stayed at the movie theater for most of a year. But these days, with movies barely staying in a movie theater for more than 60 days, a film has to have a lot of pop on the front, most of this due to failures of liberalism. The movies are controlled by labor unions who want inflated budgets with unlimited money spent. And if a studio complies, they are rewarded with good press that will take them close to a good box office score. Disney got caught trying to appease everyone, including BlackRock, and they made everyone mad with a movie that had its budget out of control. If George Lucas was producing this Indiana Jones film, he would have kept the budget under 100 million, or he wouldn’t have made the picture. Kathy Kennedy let the budget spike up to around 300 million before advertising. So the standard is the problem, and the controllers expect to rule the marketplace. And Disney has damaged their own brand, so anti-Disney people started campaigning against this Indiana Jones movie several years ago. Then there was the political agenda from BlackRock and Vanguard about replacing Indiana Jones with a woman and killing off the Western hero for global communism. Disney picked the fans for its own survival, and the industry pounced, writing many negative articles against Indiana Jones, hoping to sink the film and punish the studio for not complying with the globalism mandate. 

Ultimately, this Indiana Jones film will be well respected and could have been financially successful if Disney had managed the budget. But it got out of control, and they thought they could spin it into a billion-dollar grosser. But without the support of the industry analysts, who are communist in most of their approaches to everything, the World Economic Forum activists worked overtime to ensure that it would never get there. They would have talked the movie up if Disney had killed off Indiana Jones. But they resorted to punishing the movie because it was a good hero story with a classic character living to see a happy ending. That was a good move for Disney in the long run because Indiana Jones will be around longer than the World Economic Forum. I’m not sure that Disney will make it. I’m telling people to go to the parks now while they are still there because I don’t think Disney will survive what they’ve done to themselves, which they are now the Bud Light of entertainment. When people think of Disney, they no longer think of Mickey Mouse but woke monsters who want to groom children. And once you lose that brand, it’s gone forever in this climate. They played the game wrong, and now it’s going to cost them.   They fixed the Indiana Jones movie in time to save it. But they should have done the same to themselves several years ago instead of committing to the World Economic Forum’s woke agenda of gender desecration, which started to become evident with the killing of Han Solo and that terrible Buzz Lightyear movie. 

It’s not an Indiana Jones problem; over the coming year, most people will watch the movie and like it, whether at the theater or at home on a streaming service. It’s a good family movie, but it’s too late for a course correction by Disney to save it at the box office. Because Disney is having problems everywhere. People are rejecting them as a company. That doesn’t mean that they’ll never have another billion-dollar film again. But they have lost permanent market share because of their woke commitment. And now their woke bosses at BlackRock are punishing them in the trades if they don’t stay committed to the continued desecration of American heroes. So the news isn’t good for Indiana Jones, but it’s not because the movie is bad. But there are undoubtedly many bad characters who are politically motivated on both sides, and Disney mismanaged the whole thing to their detriment. The lesson for everyone is not to pick against the audience, not to feed the everlasting hunger of the trade unions with inflated budgets, and to never align yourself with global activism against good stories and heroes who stand against evil. This is why I said it was a bad idea for Bob Iger to come back. I don’t know what he was thinking about taking a job that was bound to be a loser. There was no way to fix this Disney problem. And instead of being viewed as a pretty good CEO over his years, he’ll be remembered as the guy who let it all fall apart. But the truth is, this started a long time ago when the board started listening to global activists for communism and bending their films toward the China market. All that was a mistake that is showing itself at the box office. And it has nothing to do with Indiana Jones as a movie. If anything, people are supporting the movie more than they otherwise would. The problem is Disney, and I’m afraid that it’s a condition that will never correct itself.  

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

A Review of ‘The Sound of Freedom’: God’s Children are not for sale

Boy, that was a good movie, the Sound of Freedom. I intended to see it on the 4th of July when Angel Studios released it, a bold move considering they were putting a critical box office movie in the middle of summer between the new Indiana Jones film and the latest Mission Impossible project. I like these Angel Studios guys; I’ve worked with independent studios in the past, namely the Atlas group for the Atlas Shrugged films, so I have an appreciation for how difficult it is to make a movie in the first place, especially one with a big message like the Sound of Freedom has. But that’s only half the battle. Getting a movie distributed through the theaters is the biggest hurdle, and it’s been in that way that finance has been able to take over the movie industry. Putting this movie out on the 4th of July was hard because it competed with other big studio films with big marketing budgets. I think we should see this kind of thing more often because people hunger for good movies. And it’s usually not an either-or kind of decision. There’s room for Indiana Jones. And there is room for Sound of Freedom. I honestly didn’t expect much from the Sound of Freedom. I thought the movie would have a good message and was important to support. So when I tried to buy tickets for the film on July 3rd and 4th when my wife and I had some free time to see it, I wasn’t too disappointed that I couldn’t find any theaters that weren’t sold out in my area, or if they did have open seats, that we couldn’t find two together. We weren’t going to go to the movies and not sit together; that was ridiculous. So I waited until the following weekend, and we had the same problem. But we did manage to find two open seats for a Saturday afternoon in the third row, which I usually wouldn’t do because it’s too close to the screen. But we bought the tickets, went to see the movie, and were both blown away by what we saw.

The Sound of Freedom was actually, technically, a great film. It reminded me of Schindler’s List, one of my all-time favorite films. But pacing-wise, it reminded me of the Clint Eastwood-directed American Sniper. The Sound of Freedom was of excellent quality, on the level of those kinds of movies, and at a different time, this would undoubtedly be the Best Picture of the Year for the Academy Awards. The director, Alejandro Monteverde, put a lot of love into this film, and it sure showed. It was more of an action-adventure picture, more like Taken, rather than a documentary on child sex trafficking. To be honest, after seeing lots of clips from Jim Caviezel, I thought this film would be more of an activist movie. It certainly was; this film was made by really good people for good reasons, from top to bottom. But it was a far better movie than what usually comes out of those intentions. The director Alejandro Monteverde made a great movie with Jim Caviezel and the cast based on the real-life exploits of the Homeland Security agent Tim Ballard without knowing how the movie would get to the public. The movie has been done for five years; it was first going to be distributed by Fox, then Disney owned the rights, and they sat on it for a long time. Eventually, this new studio, Angel Studios, came along and picked up the rights. They are the studio behind the very well-done television show, The Chosen. So they picked it up and brought it to movie theaters.

Since most of the film production was Mexican, it brought the life of the cartels into sharp focus in ways that I hadn’t seen before. It was a very gritty movie that put viewers into the world of sex trafficking without being oppressively difficult to deal with. The Sound of Freedom walked that very fine line between being tasteful and hopeful, with Jim Caviezel playing the real-life Tim Ballard with such optimism that it wasn’t hard to fall in love with these people. I say all the time about movies, one of the biggest problems is that the writers of these things often don’t have much life experience. You can see that in big studio pictures where the writers clearly hang out in Santa Monica, and their perspective is from that world. The Sound of Freedom was written and directed by people who know the world’s dark underbelly but have not become hopelessly lost in it. What ended up on the screen is really something stunningly special. A movie everyone can enjoy that is much more optimistic than I thought it would have been. And not to give away spoilers, but I think it’s important to note because I honestly wasn’t fighting too hard to see this movie because they are usually depressing. While you want to know about these problematic subject matters, who wants to experience a depressing story? But I can say this movie has a very happy ending. I will likely see it many more times because it really was inspirational, hopeful, and bold. 

At the end of the movie, Jim Caviezal came on and gave a little speech, which was very appropriate, during the credits. They also put up a QR code which I took a picture of for this blog site. They encouraged people in the audience to buy tickets for people who couldn’t afford to go to the movie with a Pay it Forward campaign, which I thought was pretty clever and smart marketing on behalf of Angel Studios. There is a lot to like about this entire enterprise that will undoubtedly give hope to anybody who goes and sees it. For those who feel pretty hopeless about the world’s condition, I would strongly recommend The Sound of Freedom as soon as you can get to a theater and see it. I would recommend buying tickets and sending them to someone who might be on the fence. Not only for the box office need for a film like this, because this is how these kinds of movies get made. If they do well at the box office, it impacts the rest of the industry, which is precisely what is needed now with the amount of genuinely sinister aspects of culture that are on our nightly news. This movie is a ray of hope and deserves all the credit that can be given to it. I would personally like to see a lot more out of Angel Studios because this project is a real treasure. And the world could use a lot more from them. But it takes money to tell these kinds of stories, and this is a movie that was done on a high level as a kind of leap of faith. And we are lucky to have it. The world is better because of it. And maybe people will become educated enough from this movie to do something about sex trafficking and the amount of it that is destroying the lives of the innocent before they ever have a chance to live life for themselves. 

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

Communism in our Culture: What we learned from the Darbi Boddy interview

The failure on all fronts is the breakdown of the logic of communist philosophy as it has been accepted and taught to us through our public education system. This question has been asked of me many times since I did the video interview with Darbi Boddy, the Lakota school board member that the institution itself wanted to eliminate before she ever had a chance to do anything in the job. This idea that the system is in charge and not the voters is obviously a problem that was witnessed with President Trump, as the Deep State worked aggressively to get rid of Trump before he even had a chance to get into the White House. On a more local level, the same approach came at Darbi Boddy; it’s baked into the assumptions we have as a culture, one that slowly, over many years, accepted a communist view of the world as opposed to the efforts of a meritocracy—talking to her and hearing her point of view it’s easy to hear where the problem is. When she was first a school board member in those opening days, the institution aggressively sought to romance her into friendship, and the goal was then to use that friendship toward the aims of group consensus. Actually, the entire education system, as Dewey designed it, is designed to break students down into their forever social compliance roles; whether they would be the popular kids, the scrappy worker bees, or the garbage heap bottom-of-the-barrel types, public education was meant to break kids down into their social roles, and the same application would, of course, be applied to the leadership to get the same results. We weren’t teaching kids or their teacher’s exceptionalism; we were teaching sameness and class structure. The goal was class and to put people in those classes so they’d be easy to control.

After that interview with Darbi, I had a number of people call me and warn me of the terrible thing that I had done; I had given her a platform to speak from. I had allowed her to function outside of the class structure they felt was necessary for the maintenance of a public school, and it was determined that she was going to be smoked out because she had resisted the compliance culture of sameness that was expected in public education, especially on the school board level. Of course, I answered that was precisely why I ran an alternative news and opinion site because I hated communism and wanted more people like Darbi to be able to get their word out and let people see who they were, not what some communist caricature of her interpreted for the audience. It was a good interview with her, and you can know how much by how many people were upset by it. It wasn’t anything she had said, but that she had the means to say it that they were so angry with. And within that sentiment was the solution and fix to the entire problem. The weakness of communism, of course, is a society that functions on merit. When people earn their reputations and aren’t controlled by the consensus builders based on behavior, that’s when the system breaks down quickly because communists never figured it out. They simply implemented it as Karl Marx designed it, then put it out for society to follow in every way that institutions had formed in relation to the communist position. But that’s what we are dealing with. That is the goal behind globalism in general and why they expect to run the world with China-style communism as the tool.

I’ve studied this topic for a long time, including tracing the footsteps of Karl Marx and his studies in the British Museum. I had to see it for myself where the most destructive philosophy ever introduced to the human race was created. It has only been recently that communism has lost some of the stigmas that it naturally had against it in American culture because now the cat is out of the bag, and the China model is not a well-kept secret anymore. I pointed this out to everyone when Lakota schools started an exchange program to send teachers to China to learn how the communist China model would work. I was against it, and many bellyached about my comments. After all, China was our friend. I’ve openly talked about communism in our culture for my entire adult life, and the mechanism it uses is this consensus-building method that you see on every school board, every board room meeting, and every approach that involves groups of people working out common problems. You especially see it in politics, where sameness is expected. The message is that people come and go. What we need is institutional stability by taking away the peaks and valleys of performance. It was the institution that mattered more than individual input. That was the communist message to America, and by now, almost everyone involved in group activity utilizes those methods to maintain control of the institutions they serve. 

Of course, people like Darbi were elected by people who expect a more free market approach to the social management problem, which is the same for Trump as well. The public has not accepted that communism maintained through social interactions (friendships) is as big of a problem as it really is. Because they believe in America as a merit-based society, they still believe that individuals can move mountains if allowed to utilize the best and brightest ideas among them. At the same time, communism seeks to protect the institution from those pesky fluctuations of individualized input. This is why the McCarthy hearings in the 1950s were so critical and criticized by those trying to bring communism to America. The reason communism is dangerous is that we have fought several wars trying to protect ourselves from removing social interactions with individual input into a compliance structure where inputs are interchangeable and worthless. Darbi was elected to bring her individual character to the school board to represent the voters who put her there. But the school board itself, from the OSBA and down to the president, which is a person I know personally, was to get control of her. And once they realized they would never have control of Darbi, the resolve was to use the institutional protections of communism to get rid of her, with group pressure. And so many people who call themselves conservatives fell in line with the communist way of thinking. They were so far gone they could no longer see the situation objectively. And that made them hate Darbi even more because she made them realize how anti-capitalist they were in their lives. The way that communism expects to command the world through centralized authority is by controlling the expectations of what institutionalism actually does. When individuals spend their time on institutional compliance rather than the contributions of individual merit to a group debate, the power structure has shifted to centralized authority rather than merit-based input, which is the root cause of many of the world’s problems presently. It’s easy enough to fix once people realize that’s what’s going on. And in my own school district, the reaction to the Darbi Boddy interview told the story clearly for all to see, which is why she has been so good as a school board member.   We are working to get communism out of our public life, and schools are the first place to start. And to do that, we need good school boards and many more people like Darbi to bring value to managing these public assets. 

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

Hidden River Cave: One of the Great Treasures in the World

Looking up and out of Hidden River Cave

We happened to be in the Mammoth Cave area to show my grandchildren what caves were all about. I’ve always loved the Cave City exit off I-65 and have been to Mammoth Cave many times over the years. But I had not been back there in around ten years, certainly before Covid, so my wife and I were very surprised to find their new reservation system clunky. Granted, Mammoth Cave is the longest cave system in the world and is quite a treasure in the United States. It’s a top-class national park, and if there is something I love, it’s National Parks. So the Mammoth Cave National Park is a busy one. But unlike in the past, where you could show up the same day you wanted to tour the cave, now you have to schedule your tour weeks and months in advance. And ahead of our trip with the grandkids and all their parents, we found out a week ahead of our visit that all the tours were booked up. However, during June and July, Mammoth Cave does offer self-guided tours, which is all I was interested in anyway. My kids were not interested in listening to someone talk for two hours. They wanted to go and explore things at their own pace. So we did that tour and gave the kids exposure to one of the greatest cave systems in the world, so they could say that they had been there and done it, essentially.

Sometimes the cave floods, but not in a dangerous way

Yet, many caves in the area extend outside the National Park borders. So I planned to take the kids to some of the privately owned caves, which I hoped would be much more customer friendly. And that’s precisely what happened. In addition to exploring Mammoth Cave, we went to Onyx Cave, which is right off the exit in Cave City. It was very nice, and the kids could get much more adventurous with the cave system itself. The tour guides were much looser than the stiff-necked Mammoth Cave guides, who have too many rules to have fun and are way too wrapped up in hippie conservation talk. Every time you breathe in a National Park cave, some government employee is crying about humans’ impact on the earth that might affect cave growth. But not at Onyx Cave. It was a very enjoyable experience, and the grandkids could learn a lot about caves and get adventurous without stepping into the actual category of “spelunking.” They were too little for rough cave exploring yet, complete with lights on helmets and crawling through passages on your belly. The trail at Onyx Cave was great; it had a lot of steps, and we could see many stalagmites and stalactites up close. And the tour was just long enough to be interesting without getting boring. After those two experiences, I wasn’t satisfied that the kids had explored caves sufficiently enough to be educational, not in the ways they needed to. So the whole trip required a climax, and I found it just a few miles up the road from our campsite in Cave City at Horse Cave. Horse Cave is the actual name of a town, and it’s two miles off I-65 and features a cave system that runs under the town called Hidden River Cave. I wasn’t sure what we were getting into, but it sounded promising. So on the last day of our visit, we arrived there in the pouring rain and had a fantastic little adventure.

My granddaughter enjoying an adventure

Hidden River Cave was everything I had been looking for regarding a cave experience. It was privately owned, but the investment was better than what we had just seen at Mammoth Cave. They had almost a whole city block of cave tourism that was very well organized, complete with a fantastic museum. And it was all right in the middle of town. It is so well hidden that most people coming to the Mammoth Cave site have no idea it’s even there. But after visiting, I would say anybody going to Mammoth Cave should make Hidden River Cave part of their journey. It’s so good that really I would say it’s better than going to Mammoth Cave. It’s much easier to deal with as a visitor, and the cave interaction is much more adventurous. The cave tour itself takes visitors back into the system as it runs directly under the town of Horse Cave, around ¾ of a mile. It’s not a long tour, but just long enough to be interesting. My kids weren’t bored at all; the cave isn’t as well lit up as Mammoth Cave which is a big plus because it allows you to get your own flashlights out and use them to see. But the path you walk on is fantastic, exceptionally well built and features the longest underground suspension bridge in the world that spans across a deep underground gorge where the Hidden River rages by underneath. Because it’s a river, it floods often and did flood over after all the heavy rain just a few days after we left the area. That is why the trail is so good because it’s built to withstand flooding. So, there was nothing rickety and unsafe about it. But it didn’t feel too touristy either; it was an adventurous experience without being uncomfortable or hazardous for little ones.

It’s a deep cave that runs right under the town. A literal secret passage way into the underworld

Three hundred million years ago, the Mammoth Cave region was the coastline of an inland ocean. The equator was in a different place, to the north, so the sea did its work to carve out all these cave features by working through the sandstone layers and getting down into some of the intense limestone, which is why there are over 400 miles to the Mammoth Cave system, and all these exciting pockets of private cave tours like Hidden River Cave that are so conveniently off the highway. Visitors can get up close and personal with adventurous tours without getting dirty and spending an entire day going spelunking, which are options offered at Hidden River Cave. They had a whole adventure course with zip lines and canopy ropework behind the tourist entrance. This cave experience was created by adventurers for the purpose of exploration, and it had the right vibe I was hoping for. But what was missing was that stiffness you get at the National Parks. We have been to many of them, including Yellowstone, the Grand Tetons, and the Badlands, and while those places are very nice, they have a kind of government bureaucracy to them that was completely gone at Hidden River Cave. In the context of some of the best places in the world to go, Hidden River Cave is one of the best, and it’s so easy to get to. I would highly recommend it. It’s worth a trip by itself. As I said, the cave does flood, so it’s very adventury down in it. But when it rains heavily, it fills up after a few days. It’s not like people would be caught down there in a flash flood. It takes a few days to fill and a few days longer for all the water to run out. But the result of the cave itself is that it’s just wild enough to experience caves in an adventurous way, without the dangers of exploring caves that this level of interaction actually entails. The Hidden River Cave experience is a wonderful option showing how private ownership often gets the best results, which is undoubtedly the case here.

There is nothing better than teaching young people the path to a good life

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

Isaac Adi Gets Violent Again: An Interview with Darbi Boddy

It has been interesting to watch the trajectory of two school board officeholders who essentially started at the same place but took two different paths upon being elected to satisfy the parameters of accomplishment. Obviously, there is more to the conflict this past week between Isaac Adi and Darbi Boddy on the Lakota school board, where the police investigated a condition of assault, where Isaac, yet again under pressure, lashed out at someone trying to record his public behavior. Darbi is a tough young lady who can handle conflicts just fine. But what’s interesting is how RINOs are created because once elected, Isaac went into an appeasement mode of the very kind of people he was supposed to be engaging with, whereas Darbi has stayed faithful to her campaign promises. I talked to Darbi about all this while we were both at a March for Children rally in downtown Hamilton, Ohio. Darbi never advertised herself as anything but a fighter for children’s rights, whereas the same was expected from Isaac. But once elected, what was witnessed was an instant barrage of influencers who often inject themselves into the newly elected person’s life, and the temptation to appease these new faces is powerful, and most people never develop resistance to it. When I see these clips of Isaac Adi acting violently toward people who put cameras on him to record aggressive behavior, I see that conflict in his actions. Isaac is not alone in this problem. Being authentic has a freedom of its own which was quite apparent when I was able to talk to Darbi on camera about her first few years as a school board member at Lakota. You can see freedom of conscience in her because she has stayed true to herself. But others have not, and that often leads to the kind of obvious frustrations on the face of Isaac Adi in the footage of him lashing out at Darbi.

I worked with both Isaac and Darbi during their campaigns because many of us wanted to help Lynda O’Conner have conservative votes to work with on the Lakota school board. We felt sorry for Lynda and tried to help her. Isaac and Darbi essentially ran together as a package during the campaign, and they won their elections easily. But as soon as the election was over, Lynda started talking about controlling the school board members in ways that didn’t sound very Republican. And immediately, the OSBA (Ohio School Board Association) started to do its work; it’s like a club. They invite new school board members into the warm embrace of friendship, and it doesn’t take much for that type of romance to entice lonely people or people with a natural personality to want to please others. Admittingly, that was a concern I had about Isaac during the campaign; he was so friendly and so outgoing that I was concerned that he would find the desire to appease the other school board members too lucrative when conflict was the best approach. One thing that we did talk about that didn’t make it on camera was Darbi’s support network, with Kelly Kohls at the National Leadership Council (NSBLC), which offers an alternative to the support of the more labor-union-controlled OSBA. Lynda O’Conner and I have talked specifically about the OSBA; she thinks it’s a good organization. I think along the lines of Darbi and Kelly on the matter. But the obvious results are in the influences that led to Darbi doing what voters expected on the Lakota school board and Isaac looking to appease all these new friends, which is the game of politics that happens at every level.

As I explained to Darbi, I am proud of her, as many are. I’ve been doing this kind of thing, supporting candidates in many ways, for many years, and most of the time, it results in a dud. It’s like going to the fireworks store for the Fourth of July and buying a bunch of fireworks that never blow up. You have great expectations, but they just fizzle out when you light the fuse. Whereas with Darbi, she has exploded in all the right ways that were very satisfying and surprising. Every now and then, your hopes and expectations are met, which is the case with Darbi. She was not seduced by all the forces that have taken public education in the wrong direction, and that has been great to see. The ratio for me is about 10 to 1. Of every ten candidates I have worked with over the years, you occasionally get one Darbi. Of course, I knew when such an honest person like Darbi, who simply wanted to do an excellent job as a school board member, confronted a system with so much bad behavior in it, and that bad behavior was hidden from the public through friendships that were designed to conceal it; then there would be conflict. I get emails from people all over the country from people who are political moderates who are jealous that they don’t have someone like Darbi Boddy on their school board. I am very proud of her and would love to have three or four more like her, people who could resist the temptations of group consensus at the expense of voter responsibility.

I brought this up during our talk, how one player for the Reds inspired many others to get better. In many ways, Darbi has been that person for Lakota

We don’t elect people into politics to get along, which is becoming more evident in national politics. We don’t expect physical altercations either, but one of the problems that lead to so much corruption is the appeasement of peers, which is at the heart of the problem at every level. At Lakota, at the fundamental community level, we can see two people who started in the same place and quickly went in entirely different directions. From both perspectives, they had good intentions, yet during our talk, Darbi hit the nail on the head; much of the evil that starts in the world of politics doesn’t come from some pitch-forked devil; it’s often the friendly face who wants to buy you dinner and treat you like a king or princess. Of course, they expect something in return. But it’s often hard to see because it feels good to be liked. Some people will do anything to be liked; once others know that about you, they own you. And at that point, elected representatives often go bad when they fall in love with being loved because, just like a manipulative spouse, once they start jerking around your feelings, you lose the authenticity of why people voted for you in the first place. And at the heart of the conflict between Darbi and Isaac, two people who ran for office together and had been friends, is this villain of appeasement. The lucrative nature of being accepted in the warm embrace of friendship within institutional confinement is a nector all its own. And thankfully, in our community, Darbi didn’t fall for it, much to the frustration of those who wanted to seduce her into it. That’s why people tell me they are jealous of us in Lakota because they see the clear value in elected representatives like Darbi Boddy. The controversy only comes from those who want to steer her in a different direction. But she has stayed with the voters authentically, and people appreciate that, as they do with all people who do so. And with Isaac, it’s frustrating when you can’t please everyone, and that comes out in these outbursts caught on camera twice now. As Darbi said to me, she gets tired of how people talk behind closed doors and speak in public. That duality is the source of the problem because an honest person would be the same in any format. 

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

Hiding Evil Behind Artificial Intelligence: Child Sacrifice at Tel Gezer and the modern hunger for more of it

My opinion on ChatGPT A.I. is not very good, I see it as a gimmicky way for lazy people to get out of doing the hard work of thinking. And it shows in the final product. The A.I. programs are pretty good at copying source material, but they are not good at coming up with original thoughts, and I think this will always be the case to some extent. If humans make AI, and not all humans are equal, then those flows will be in the source code, and A.I. will be limited forever in what it can do. Many people think I am using A.I. to write the amount I do. But I wouldn’t do that; I will always be like the Amish to some extent. The quality of the work comes from old-fashioned methods, and even if mass production can produce more, people will always honor and respect Amish craftsmanship. And that will always be valued, especially in creative thought. This is why I thought the story coming out of Bavaria, Germany, was particularly interesting regarding the new concept at a protestant Church to have a complete A.I. service, let by computers. As someone who has studied most of the world’s religions, it is clear to me what is going on and what the World Economic Forum’s support of it is trying to achieve. There is a vast evil at work in the background that has always been nipping at the heels of the human race, and it is finding another vehicle to carry its nonsense in the invention of artificial intelligence. I’m not an anti-technology kind of person, but I don’t ever think it will become far superior to human thought because thinking occurs beyond the digitized ability of computers, which is why the people who think this church service at St. Paul’s in Furth, Germany will replace all human religions because A.I. is smarter and has more profound insight into the mysteries of the universe. The truth is quite the opposite. 

The proposal is that ChatGPT will write a new Bible and that once humans accept that Artificial Intelligence is so much smarter than humans, the old religions will drop away, and this will be how the New World Order run by the Desecrators of Davos from the World Economic Forum will run the world as a centralized one world government. This was always their plan and why they are pushing this church service in Germany as the next great thing. (Why do all these maniacal plots to take over the world always come out of Germany? Some of these guys could use a girlfriend)  Listening to all this, I see the work of that vast evil trying to camouflage itself in society by conceding to a new religion run by artificial intelligence but ultimately programmed by the centralized planners of future communism in Europe run by the World Economic Forum behind the smiling mask of the United Nations. And here’s why, ChatGPT might be able to write its own kind of Bible for a new religion that it makes up, and it may be able to host church services. But it cannot make up history. It can only generate stories. One of the greatest things about the Bible that other religions struggle with, especially Islam, is the validity of their source material. The Bible is rooted in many thousands of years of actual history. It is a window into the world before the destruction of the Library of Alexandria. Much of the Bible can be verified by archaeology, so its merit goes far beyond some simple stories that artificial intelligence could replicate. And in so doing, the same evil that is essentially the struggle of the Bible that is always working in the background would be missed by artificial intelligence, which is the point of the advocacy. This becomes even more apparent when you realize that many of the modern WEF globalists are still worshipers of the same evil that ruined societies in Mesopotamia and all over the Middle East, which Christianity was rebelling against, which presented the Bible, to begin with, as a unified force on the world stage.

All this reminded me of a fantastic article I read back in 2015 in Biblical Archaeology Review about the 1902 dig at Tel Gezer by Robert Macalister, who uncovered a grisly sacrificial site dedicated to the Canaanite god Moloch. The site is quite astonishing as it is a typical “high place” site with 10′ tall stone pillars set up with great effort. These Canaanite gods, such as Baal, Moloch, and Ishtar, were the villains of the Bible. Their work of destruction embodies Yahweh’s anger throughout the entire text. It was common practice for the Canaanites to sacrifice their children to these gods in despicable ways, and this was the justification for the Hebrew people to invade the promised land and take that land from the Canaanites to establish Israel, as we know it today, eventually. Discovered at that site by Macalister were the remains of a young girl sawed in half and placed on the altar. And nearby are piles of bones from similar youth killed in much the same way. The violence that would have embodied such sacrifices to these gods is horrendous, and it’s still with us today all over the world. When you peel back the layers of child sex trafficking, the desecration of children in public schools, and even abortion, we are dealing with the essential evil that drove the Canaanites to sacrifice their children to unseen gods for all the same reasons. 

Of course, this is why the World Economic Forum, a cast of very evil characters who intend evil in the world for their similar religious views as the ancient practitioners of child sacrifice conducted, wants to replace religion with an Artificial Intelligence that they plan to control at the source programming level then sell it to a gullible public as more intelligent and worth following. And in so doing, they hope to hide much of the evil that the Bible exploits, so they can continue to live their lives under its guidelines, the guidelines of villainy and sacrifice to the unseen elements that are always looming with bloodlust just behind the veil of our conscious reality. Yet they make themselves known through weak people dressed up as technological aristocrats and borderless globalists intent on preserving the past religions dedicated to Moloch’s appeasement. Before the Bible came along, the thousands of years of history that are told within it, this was how the world operated, with evil running in the background, and this modern push to return to that anti-Christ sentiment is very much the fuel of our modern news stories, of Epstein Island, of drug cartels, of the kind of information we have learned from the Hunter Biden laptop. The hope is that by trusting A.I. as superior to human thought, evil as we know it can hide in the background without referencing history, such as has been discovered at sites like the “High Place” at Tel Gezer. And without a moral position to consider something as “evil,” there is no human race judgment to stop it. But only to conform to its insatiable hunger, which was the point of the Bible, to begin with. The World Economic Forum hopes to rule over people by replacing their religion with their A.I.-controlled devices of deceit and malice. And everything that is going on with A.I. is not to make things better but to hide what is bad from the eyes of justice.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

I’m An Anti-Federalist: I’m never going to sign up for global communism or a life without the American Constitution

Since there is so much talk about revolution, law and order, and proper conduct for people and their government, let’s put a few things in perspective. Most of the people in the world are really dumb. Not because they lack intelligence but because they have not educated themselves and are entirely too dependent on the government education they received as kids and young adults, and their minds are rotten. This was a purposeful excursion into the world of control as the powers of the world have intended. One of the first things I did on this blog site was to establish that a couple of my favorite works of literature are the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. I consider the American Constitution to be one of the most important works of philosophy in the history of the world. And that trajectory will continue despite this current globalist movement toward borderless communism led by a new military power in the world, the aristocratic financiers. The trajectory of human experience naturally drives them toward more personal freedom, whereas the power structures using technology to facilitate it seek more centralized control resulting in the kind of divisiveness we see today. When governments try to take people where they naturally don’t want to go, people would have a moral, ethical, and legal right to stop them. I never signed up for a communist takeover of my government, so if a government tries to move in that direction, people naturally have a moral obligation to fight it for the sake of all future humanity.   Because of the poor quality of their education systems, most people don’t know what they should be thinking or doing. They just know what they feel even if their intellectual aptitude has been robbed from them deliberately by these corrupt forces to acquire power that has always been at the heart of the problem. 

When I say I love the American Constitution, I love it as a work of philosophy as part of the evolution of human experience that will continue along that many thousands of years of trajectory. That collision of personal freedom and expression is colliding with many millions of years of human beings clambering to be the village chief of their tribe and the centralized authority of their localized clan. People naturally want to be in charge of other people, even if people as a species are constantly growing away from that primal perspective. But I am not happy at all with the tone of the American Constitution.   I see Federalism to be entirely too restrictive and centralized, which is uncomfortably too cozy with big government solutions. During the debate of the original Constitution, I would not have been happy with the eventual Constitution, as I would have been aligned with the Anti-Federalist sentiment, such as Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr. I live in the town named after the big-time Federalist Alexander Hamilton. But I would not have liked Hamilton. I think the world was done a great service when he lost the duel with Aaron Burr and that the world would be a lot better off if people still settled their disputes with one another with duels instead of hiring a bunch of pansy lawyers to go to court. Courts have been a poor substitution for the restitution of satisfaction. But, I have agreed to live in such a society under those rules, and its that settled Constitution that I have signed up for, even if I don’t agree with much of the big government approach that was in the final Constitution for which we have built our laws around as a nation. History now shows how wise such a Constitution was and how a country could prosper. So, it’s worth defending as written.

However, I view the Bill of Rights as a concession to the Anti-Federalist arguments, which is precisely what they were. I am personally to the right of the Bill of Rights by quite a lot. Much of my personal beliefs are to the right of Thomas Jefferson and other early Anti-Federalists, so what ended up in our Constitution naturally is too oppressive for me as it is. The Bill of Rights, which was added after the Constitution was ratified, was included to appease the Anti-Federalists. George Washington was a Federalist; I don’t talk much about him. He may have done a great job as a leader of his time, but he’s not the kind of person I’d sit down with and talk all night about philosophy.   George Washington was entirely too liberal for me. And that is even more true today for people who do their homework and read the Constitution and understand history; the conflicts being expressed presently are an attempt to reverse the course of the human race back to a dependent culture that runs contrary to the desires of all human beings. George Washington and his buddy Alexander Hamilton and John Adams were good people with roots still in the old aristocracy of Federalist ideas. While they rebelled against the crown’s control over the colonies, they still liked to play dress up and dance with the ladies as military officers. The Anti-Federalists wouldn’t even want the military because they could be used as an oppressive force against the rights of the people. 

This is why the notion that Trump supporters, or any hard-liner conservatives, are Nazis or fascists, or anything derogatory, is rooted in sheer stupidity. All those terms are along the scale of European socialism and communism as defined by Karl Marx and are not even considerations in American life, which evolved from the philosophy of the Constitution and the economic concepts identified in the great work by Adam Smith and his Wealth of Nations. Because global academics have ignored Adam Smith and embraced Karl Marx, that doesn’t mean they were right. All it means is that people trusted authority too much to question what was being taught and not ask the basic questions as to whether it should be taught, as most people would be better off without knowing anything about Karl Marx. But Karl Marx facilitated those immature urgencies in the effort for the village chiefs to retake the primal desire for centralized authority. The work of the American Constitution is what everyone should be studying and using to have successful cultures of their own. But as for global definitions, the political spectrum isn’t along the lines of hard Karl Marx and soft Karl Marx, but no Karl Marx all together. Global communism and socialism are not an option; for America, there is only one law: the Constitution. If we are dealing with a government that seeks to get rid of it in favor of something else if that’s the case, I’m to the political right of the Anti-Federalist types, and the fight will be along those lines. Not in digital currency, run by a bunch of dumb Marxists in Switzerland while debating the merits of cuff links over tea. I’m happy to live under the restrictions of the American Constitution because it has a history of working, even if it drives me crazy with too much-centralized government. But for those who want to get rid of that law, I think the world would be a lot better off with Aaron Burrs and the duels of satisfaction than the brain-dead stupidity of the Deep State bureaucrats. And if they want to go there, that’s on them.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

The Global Government Mob: Of course, they want to get rid of Trump to show their power over people

It used to be more common to assume that organized crime ran specific sectors of our economy, and they stayed just a bit out of range to hide in the background. People knew they were out there, but so long as they could live their lives, they typically didn’t know much about them and their workings. But that hasn’t been the case for a few decades. I have a bit of experience in this kind of thing, I used to be personal friends with several hitmen who worked for various mobsters, both in Newport, Kentucky, who had their very aggressive fingers in the Chester Road enterprises in Sharonville in the 80s, and of course, all roads for the mob went to Chicago if you lived in the Midwest. I spent a few years in that kind of life driving them and their girlfriends around town because I was the one who was always straight, so I was able to see how this relationship between the underworld and the common world worked. And how people were killed or prosecuted to take out rivals and how all those relationships interacted with politics. Ironically, I was associating with these people while a slow transition occurred from private sector interactions to where the best way for the mob to operate was by moving into government. And why not? If you want to rob people, then why not get the power to do it legally? From their perspective, it made perfect sense. So I’m not being inflammatory when I say that most of the world’s governments, especially anything coming out of the World Economic Forum and its relationship with the United Nations, are simply a global form of the mob. Not so much run by regional families but an international cabal of conspirators who see themselves as a New Age aristocracy.

And that’s largely why we have the mess we have today; the government has become the new generation mob. Instead of trying to hide their activity from the cops, they simply gained control of the cops. Instead of killing people, dumping their bodies in a river, or cutting them up and sending all the body parts to a grieving mother, they became the prosecutors and even now control the White House. The Biden family is a crime family; that observation goes far beyond political sentiment. Facts support it, and when you can see how the law is protecting those crimes, it’s easy to understand why these types of people want power so much. Because they want to commit crimes and not represent people in a Republic, they are parasites, and this is now a global operation that uses the United Nations as a front group. Many people still have a hard time understanding what happened with Covid, but what must be realized is that the government aligned with big pharma to assist a change state attack by the World Economic Forum in implementing a strategy built by insanity. It’s an evil so vast that ordinary people can’t even get their minds around it, which I saw happen many times in my own personal experiences. People just minding their own business didn’t want to know that the person they were shopping next to in the grocery store just killed someone and put their eyeballs in a jar of olives just as a practical joke. People don’t want to know that people are that evil, which is partly how these international criminals hide themselves in plain sight. But that’s what we are dealing with; the type of people who used to get involved in organized crime now find that the power of government does the same thing for them. They gain infinite ability to commit crimes against innocent people to provide for themselves easy money for their lazy lives. That’s why they are attracted to power because they are too lazy to work for money. So they make a living stealing it, and with the government, they get the power to steal money without a mask but under the laws of the IRS. 

Examples of this were never more evident than in what the American government and its connection to the cabal of the World Economic Forum, the people I call the Desecrators of Davos, than what they are currently doing to President Trump, just for daring to run for president. The tentacles of this mobster monster of government are now easy for everyone to see. They run the media; they run most of politics. They usually run the political parties, not entirely, but by default. The people in these positions don’t see themselves as mobsters. They look in the mirror and see a saint confiscating wealth from people who have it and redistributing it to those who don’t. Jesse James thought of himself as just this sort of equalizer of justice. It should be remembered that he and his criminal brother were Democrats who fought for slavery. But their tendency for crime was masked by their belief that they were Robin Hood types of characters, stealing from the prosperous north and giving it to the disenfranchised poor. They really aren’t any different from John Kerry, who steals from everyone to satisfy his insanity on phony climate science. And now that they have control of this political machine, who thinks they will give all that power back without a fight? 

Trump represents the people’s pick for their government, but what was exposed in the last few elections is that elections aren’t honest. There is too much power at stake to let some busy soccer mom pick officeholders that won’t be friendly to this new mob of global commerce. Of course, they rig elections. Of course, they are going to use the power of government to send a message to the people that Trump can’t save them. They want to put Trump in jail to show their power over people. It’s similar to that scene from The Godfather where they cut off the horse’s head and put it in bed with the target of mob terrorism. They aren’t hiding who they are because they don’t think anybody will stand against them. They own the government and think they own all the resources to terrorize anybody they want; anytime they want to. We’ve seen isolated gangs of evil in the past, such as mentioned about Jesse James and other criminal outlaws. The difference now is that globalism is the new mob because of international finance created by the Federal Reserve, BlackRock, and other malcontents of activism. The internet gives them the ability to communicate and spy on their markets. The media gives them propaganda terrorism to keep everyone stirred up into compliance. And there isn’t anybody to look over their shoulder at anymore. They don’t worry about the cops getting them or the FBI knocking on their door because they now run those agencies. It’s a great gig for them. Left unchecked, the mobs of the world always rise up to take control, which is why they can’t be left unchecked. Now, they won’t be put back into their place without being punched in the mouth in a way that hurts. There is no peace in the world. There is no way to coexist with these people. But they aren’t invincible either. They are very vulnerable once you understand what we are all fighting.  But first people have to admit what they are.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

People Want a Winner in Trump: We have a right and obligation to change our government, and elections are the most peaceful way to do it

There seems to be a lot of mystery as to why so many people support President Trump, even with over 70 criminal counts against him, multiple indictments from several states, and is facing almost 600 years in jail. Yet he’s the choice pick for president in 2024 because people get it. They understand what’s going on even if the details are too complicated or evil for them to grasp fully. We have suffered for all too long under the kind of sell-off that Speaker McCarthy just tossed America’s way with that ridiculous debt ceiling deal, an obvious loss to a feeble old man in Biden. McCarthy just signed up, without much pushback in negotiations, to 50 trillion dollars in debt by 2030. Republicans, even with a majority, never do anything when they have power, they are controlled opposition at best, and America ends up losing time and time again to radical leftist Marxists and open warfare communists. The perks are too good in government, and the temptation to become corrupt far too great, and we lose most of who we send to those positions. That is, until President Trump. He’s independently wealthy and can afford to be truly independent. So, he is free from corruption in the way it typically occurs. And people see in him an opportunity to have a real representative in the Executive Branch. They know the government is corrupt, and they have tried again over the years to find solutions to these problems, and nothing has worked except for voting for President Trump. So they are standing behind him no matter what these criminal government conspirators throw at him because they are tired of losing. People want Trump because he is a winner, he expects to win, and they understand that all these criminal indictments are simply a government that wants to take out their rival before they must compete with them in an election that will be harder to steal this time around. 

We are dealing with people who have no respect for American sovereignty and have rigged global politics to their mobster-style governing practices. When people like Jim Comey, the former FBI Director, say that Trump does not follow the Constitution, they mean in the way that they have interpreted it for their benefit. I have read the Constitution many times; I always have a copy near me within a few feet. Two of my favorite books are The Federalist Papers and The Anti-Federalist Papers, so I have an excellent grasp on what the Constitution says, and it doesn’t point to the reality that Comey and this Jack Smith loser think it says, where the government makes up rules on the back of a napkin and then expects society to enforce the laws, they create to hold power. No, the Constitution is all about limiting government and its tempting abusees from doing precisely what this Biden government has been doing. If we were not a country with over 300 million guns in it, growing daily, this government would go door to door as they wanted to during Covid and impose power on people in abusive ways. Just over the weekend of June 10th, 2023, the White House, seeing how they are getting killed with information leaks that directly tie Biden to bribery deals to Ukraine, and China are hoping to resurrect Covid protocols at the White House for no other reason than to exert power because the proof from a lot of investigations is closing in. And the government is doing the only thing it knows how to do; they are exerting power to warn people off coming after them. Because they fight, lie, cheat, and steal power so they can abuse it. Yet the Constitution is designed to protect people from that power, and ultimately, that’s why they are struggling now, to maintain the illusion of power, because they can’t go door to door and harass people, and that elections are supposed to be free, and they have been caught tampering with them. 

Who doubts now that President Trump was removed from office with a government-organized coup in 2020? With all these indictments by a corrupt government, its evident that what we are seeing is an attempted Marxist coup in America by dedicated lefties who work in the FBI, the CIA, and the entire Democratic Party, RINOs who come along for the fun of it, similar to what we witnessed in China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, and Brazil recently. Only in America do we have an expectation of Constitutionally guaranteed free speech and the rights of guns to defend ourselves from such ostentatious exhibitions of power. The Marxist enemy that wants global communism through corporate capture and finance expects people just to take it. But Trump is their peaceful resolution to the matter, their attempt to recapture their government Constitutionally from insurgent forces that have now shown their hand. Kevin McCarthy and the House Republicans continue to lose to these globalists losers? People are tired of losing to such people and will vote for President Trump because they are tired of it. And I’ll go on to say that if this election does not represent the people’s will, there will be a lot of trouble. If people don’t have Trump to vote for and that hope for a peaceful resolution is taken away from them, then there will be serious trouble for this government, and the people will have a right to do it. 

It says clearly in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence signed by Congress on July 4th, 1776, that “whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, (toward personal freedoms of the people involved) it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government.” With all this talk about the National Archives and presidential acts, and who can have classified information and that kind of thing, you can read that for yourself on the documents kept there. It’s the fundamental right of all Americans. If they don’t like their government, they can get rid of it and make a new one. And that’s the plan with Trump. People would prefer a peaceful end to all this mess, but we are not supportive of 50 trillion dollars and a government that tries to destroy former presidents just because they don’t like them. What we are dealing with in America is a government not accountable to the people it’s supposed to represent, so of course, Trump is at the top of the charts for another term. And people don’t care a bit about the charges a corrupt group of Marxists come up with to attempt to stop Trump. For most people, Trump is better than an armed removal of this corrupt government, and if anybody wants to refer to the National Archives, they are welcome to. It’s the law in America to limit the powers of government. Not to give them a blank check as Kevin McCarthy just did, and the other soft-shelled RINOs in Congress that thought playing nice with communist radicals was more important than representing the interests of the people and losing to them over and over again like a bunch of fools is not it. People want winners, and in Trump, they have one. And they want that kind of person running their government, even the independents. The Biden people and their malicious attachments know how bad they are and what they have been doing, and they are hoping to control the wrath of the people they have screwed over. But not this time. Punishment is coming for them, one way or another.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business