The Kotter Change State to Convert America to Communism
It’s called the Kotter Change Model, which is based on a paper first published by the Harvard Review years ago. It’s been around for a long time, and most organizations have had some exposure to it. It is precisely what Beijing Biden is doing by talking up China, as mentioned in the video above. China is still a backwater, copycat country of scum bag communists, yet the Biden administration is attempting to paint them as the future wave. It’s a sleight of hand trick to convert America into a communist country by setting an artificial emergency to inspire us to copy our enemy to beat them. There is nothing new about this method, only that it is being used to destroy our country, not just to change a business or organization.
It came to my attention recently from one of my editors that I produced over 12 million words from the first week of April until the date of this posting. That’s quite a lot. For instance, The Holy Bible has over 783 thousand words. There are around 677 thousand words in Atlas Shrugged. War and Peace have 587 thousand words. So you get the idea. Since early April of 2021, I have written enough to fill more than 18 books of similar length, so smoke is coming off my fingertips. Also, we have some changes in the marketplace; people love my podcasts much more than reading articles, so I’m going to take a bit of a break and finish up some projects that need time. I will still be posting daily for my readers, but it will be the podcasts for a while as I get recalibrated until about July 4th of 2021. I hope everyone enjoys the results starting with this statement above. Even if aliens are revealed in a full disclosure event, the American Constitution is still our guiding document. Just because our government reveals aliens, it’s still America First!
There is a pattern to all the evils we are witnessing for those who haven’t noticed yet. But it isn’t new; I’ve published hundreds and hundreds of articles on the topic, which can be found with an easy search of my site here. About a decade ago, we called it The Delphi Technique, a method of building consensus among groups of people in school districts toward justifying progressive budget justifications. They have since changed the name of it to many other things. Still, consensus building is now the primary objective in just about every social behavior. It means that the government has chosen to manage mass groups of people with a very top-down communist approach, which is very unsatisfying, even to people who lean to the political left. The reason is that consensus building is designed to apply peer pressure on the participants to act against their intelligence and individual ability to think. The intent is to make it clear to all that whatever decisions are made are for the good of all, not the satisfaction of the few. Its collectivism 101 and is now used in every social interaction that we have. Media heads are using consensus building to establish that there was no voter fraud in the last election. Or that we should trust everything the CDC told us about Covid-19. Or that we should elect politicians who are friendly, not practical. Critical race theory is just another consensus-building exercise meant to establish in our minds that Democrats are here today in the 21st century standing to fight slavery. They will never teach in public schools that Democrats held slaves and fought a war to keep them as the American Constitution sought to free them under Republicans.
Most people have from their birth a certain level of trust in others that their intellects have never matured into thinking on their own. This leaves them particularly vulnerable when it comes to manipulative people who try to sell them cars, condos, or big government plans created by rich billionaires meeting in Davos so they can do what all A-Type personalities since the beginning of time wanted to do, rule the world. In public schools, consensus building was always used to justify the out-of-control spending school boards and the labor unions present to the public that has to pay for all the nonsense, in business its to mitigate the needs of management to conduct a business when labor unions demand the façade of being joint owners of the management activities from the perspective of the worker. That is usually when a company must hire a consultant to defend production from the social expectations of communism which has seeped into the foundation of every labor union and is as anti-American has to put a communist flag on a front porch instead of an American one.
The premise of consensus building is to convince people, such as in a jury of our peers, to agree on what is presented despite their personal beliefs. We accept that what’s good for the many is best for the whole, and if you are an offshoot of thinking, you need to get with the program. That is essentially what lawyers do in court; they build consensus toward the guilt or innocence of their clients. If jurors ever want to go home from deliberation, they will have to reach an agreement with their peers. That is very democratic, but our nation was never intended to be anything but a republic. We elect representatives to cover us in the legislative process so we can do other things. But rule over the affairs of our country is not majority rule as they say in democracy. It’s meant to let logic reign supreme and let individual input debate the premise of a collective mass and to convince thinking people to change their minds, perhaps. Consensus building is hidden behind the same intent; only the goal is to prove a preconceived notion and then inject it into a group setting and drive approval among that group through consensus building, surrendering their private thoughts to the thoughts of the mass group.
The psychological goal of wearing masks by government mandate during the recent Covid experiments where governments worldwide were testing what they could get away within the public was that the masks were meant to build consensus. No matter what you thought of the virus, the act of wearing the masks was forced compliance to admit that there was a threat to our society. If you didn’t believe that the virus was deadly, you would be forced to think the government could put you in jail for not wearing one or that they could destroy your business, your life, and everything you would ever hope to be. So you had to accept some level of danger, allowing the government to build a consensus in society. Once that was established, when the subsequent crises came along, people were already trained to accept the consensus-building efforts on a mass scale, which in America was accepting election fraud. It’s no accident that all the media outlets and government participants, even in the GOP, were trained to accept without question that any mention of election tampering was taboo and off the table. Many people have been trained to think that individuals must sacrifice for the greater good; they bought into their self-preservation technique. That is the point where Liz Cheney got into trouble along with Mitch McConnell. They may have thought something different about the election results or saw that the attack against Trump helped them with their political futures, so they came to a consensus on the matter for all those reasons and more. That’s how consensus-building is used to cover up crimes when in fact, we should be using thought and intellect to expose crimes.
That is why it is evil to utilize consensus building in any endeavor. Getting along in society is not more important than uncovering any truth, whether the topic is UFOs flying around or election fraud. As thinking human beings in a representative republic, we should always seek intellect over the agreement. Self-interest will allow the best idea to surface through debate. But to bend society to the will of the masses and use consensus-building tricks to expose the weaknesses of our childhood training into a cover-up of mass crimes and budget overreach is pure evil. The scheme is being used to perpetuate massive criminal intent by the world’s governments by making innocent people complicit in the process. And that is where we find ourselves today. These consensus-building tools are not new, but their variants have moved from something you could name like The Delphi Technique to social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Those are not methods of communication as much as they are consensus-building tools on a mass scale to take local opinions and connect them to the world at large, not for the enhancement of communication, but to attach the individual mind to the masses of group consensus. If people disagree with you, they can criticize you just as they might in high school, where many people learned consensus-building social behavior through a simple rewards system. Do what the masses say; they will like you. Buy the popular jeans, be at the big party or be chastised, or even take the latest drugs, drink too much alcohol, or be labeled a freak. Now that is done on Facebook to hide crimes of government and their meddling in our elections. And that is why consensus building is a vast evil that needs to be eradicated, but before we can do that, you have to know, dear reader, that it is happening every day, and to you directly, just about everywhere you go.
It is baffling that Liz Cheney would think she has the gas in the tank to run for president in 2024. At best, she might be a 3% of the Republican Party kind of girl. I mean, these people are in the Beltway, they talk to the consultants who get paid to only think about these things, yet she and Mitt Romney types of people believe they have a chance in this world of politics when there are options like Trump out there. Or Ron DeSantis. Liz comes from an astute political family. As I said in the video above, she should know what kind of role her father played in the Bush administration and understand why we liked Newt Gingrich and his Tyrannosaurus Rex skull that used to be in his office. Americans who are voting for the GOP don’t want someone who “gets along” with members of the Democrat Party. Most voters see that the Democrat Party is the enemy of our way of American life, and they’d like to see all of them destroyed. They don’t want bipartisanship; they want victories. And the position that Liz Cheney has taken after the presidential election of 2020 is highly destructive to her brand. No matter how much she or the media insist that there wasn’t election fraud that kept Trump from being elected president for a second term, she is obviously out of step with how GOP voters think. And she and they should know by now that taking Trump away is not the way to pave the way for her run for president. Taking the best person away doesn’t, by default, make it achievable for her to run automatically. Liz Cheney shows just how out of touch many politicians are, and they shouldn’t be. They should know better, not less.
Anybody with half a brain knows that there was massive voter fraud in the last presidential election. First of all, the math doesn’t add up. Joe Biden can’t get 80 million votes, the most in history for any presidential candidate. The voters just weren’t there. For Democrats over 70 million, we need to be looking at making up votes by political operatives. We have seen our own FBI getting in on the action of presidential coups, so just by looking at the behavior of some of these flawed characters, we can see that the intent to commit voter fraud was undoubtedly there. Facebook and other social media companies used their platforms to push the Russian narrative in the last election to set up the election fraud story in their favor. While everyone was looking at Russians and Trump unjustifiably, the media companies were making deals with China to steal the 2020 election because they knew there was no stopping Trump. They had to cheat, and they knew they had to hustle even to have a chance. I’ve been all over this country and in several cities within it. I’ve talked to many people. There is zero chance that Joe Biden won 80 million votes. So for Liz Cheney to hope for honesty in the presidential election show extreme ignorance on her part, something the rest of the GOP is learning not to do. She is part of that old guard who believes that believing in the system is more important than standing for something people can vote for.
There is this issue of the Biden Justice Department sweeping in to stop the Arizona election audit because they know what will be found. Already in Maricopa County, it has been discovered that the Board of Supervisors deleted most of the evidence from their records on subpoenaed materials that were supposed to be turned in to Senators ten days before the auditors could get access to them. Of course, there isn’t evidence of these crimes because the people in charge deleted the evidence. Well, in my book, deleted evidence is evidence. If they don’t want you to see what they are trying to get rid of, there’s a reason why don’t you think, dear reader? Destroyed evidence is still evidence; it’s evidence of “intent.” But that’s not all; it’s just one story of thousands emerging regarding similar actions all across the country anywhere that digital voting machines counted vote tallies in the last election. In truth, there is a lot of evidence; it was recorded that the 2020 election was the most significant cybercrime in the history of the world and that China was at the center of it. They were at the center of Covid, and they were at the center of stealing our election and giving it to Joe Biden so that they could have an easy guy to beat on the world stage. And yes, there is plenty of evidence in computer analysis gathered on the night of the election hour by hour. It’s at least enough to have a court hearing on the matter. But instead of going to court to defend the actions of the cheaters, the cheaters are trying to attack the issue out of court, destroying any evidence they can get to and attacking the people gathering that evidence. Hence, they never plan to go to court because if they did, they would be slaughtered.
Liz Cheney and other mainstream Republicans should know and understand this situation. They could remain open-minded to the various options. They don’t have to take the Trump line on the matter. With a crime this big done within our intelligence agencies and political parties, taking a position that values more the public belief in our election system without there being an acknowledgment of the problem is far more dangerous. It is why Liz Cheney finds herself in trouble and losing power. She did it to herself. By declaring as she did, and Mitt Romney did, or Mitch the Bitch did, they showed the world that they care more for how things look than how they are. To be worried that exposing election fraud is more dangerous than accepting it says everything. When you have to look at the politicians themselves, they are more interested in the perks of the job and the social structure of it than in being effective at that job. They want the good ol’ days where they could lie to people, and everyone would go back to sleep. They have not admitted to themselves that the point of the Trump election was that people, voters, were tired of being lied to. They were tired of this system that did not represent them. They are tired of losing to other countries like China. They are tired of it all, and people knew it before the election, and those who want that system to continue conspired together to cheat and hope they might get away with it. And Liz put herself front and center on the issue by building her entire political platform on protecting that cheat and trying to divert attention to the riots on January 6th from angry people who are just getting madder. Somehow, she thought she would be popular enough to run for president, which only shows the level of ignorance that we are dealing with regarding those traditional types of Republicans. Politicians like Liz Cheney put the system over what the system was created for, the management of our government. Instead, she is willing to accept massive crimes to protect her perception of what value she brings to the management of that government.
I can understand why Mike Lindell went on Jimmy Kimmel to face an obvious hit piece against him. I’ve been there myself on a more local issue, but I can certainly relate to the danger of doing so. Mike has had a rough life, mainly because of his actions. He has an addictive personality which he filled with crack and cocaine abuse. I was turned off by Lindell for a long time and resisted buying any of his MyPillow products because of it. But because of all the excellent work he has done with and for President Trump, I have let him in, and I now have lots of MyPillow products in my home and RV. They are excellent products, they do make me sleep great, and I want to keep supporting Mike Lindell in his efforts because what he has done with his new wealth is some great good. He has been one of the leading advocates of election fraud that has cost him a lot. Most of the box stores have removed MyPillow products from their inventory which is a standard action that liberals all have. They mean to destroy any company that does not agree with them, and that was what culminated in Jimmy Kimmel inviting Lindell on his show to attempt to make a fool of the MyPillow inventor. Mike Lindell did the one thing he could have done to deal with such a challenge. He went on the show and attacked the problem rather than let the problem attack him. I think he did such a great job that I’m going to buy a few more pillows from the former drug addict, the now-born again Christian, and leading voice of redemption for the 2024 Trump presidential campaign.
Watching the interview with Kimmel, which Lindell features on the front page of his new Frank Speech.com social media site, is the standard to make friends with the guest so that you can lower their defenses yet attack and make fun of them as some extreme personality. Kimmel meant entirely to shame Lindell into some admission that he’s a freak with a fried brain that couldn’t be believed of anything regarding allegations of election fraud. But Kimmel is part of a larger story, the corporate story of an attempted coup where they took over our election process and put a puppet in place that they moved the mouth and expected us not to notice. Kimmel’s job, which is why he has a late-night show anyway, is to establish cultural norms through comedy to build social consensus. Lindell has been funding the efforts to root out election fraud, and now things are getting hot, particularly in Michigan and Arizona. The plan was to be well past all this by now. Because of the wealth of Mike Lindell, he has the financial resources to have these investigations. Since the government won’t audit themselves, Lindell has used his new power and influence to get the message out on his own through his funding and launch of the latest social media site to compete with Facebook and Twitter. Now that he has, many millions of people are now seeing what they suspected was always there, fire under the smoke of election fraud.
So it was Kimmel’s job as a member of that corporate media to bring Mike on his show and ridicule him into hiding. You would be surprised how common all this is. It’s not the kind of thing that gets discussed in everyday conversations, but most of us are well aware of its presence in our lives. It’s one of those over-the-shoulder things that haunts most people in everything they do. Kimmel, during the interview, went well out of his way to paint Lindell as a person still affected by crack addiction which is why he couldn’t accept the election results of the 2020 presidential coup. There isn’t any other way to talk about it. The election was an attack that should insult all of us. It certainly wasn’t a fair and honest election. But much to his credit, Mike Lindell was slick and very optimistic, and he was able to overcome all the opposition against him on that remarkable show. I’d advise anybody concerned with these kinds of things to study how Lindell handled himself with great humor and humility. I’ve been in that exact kind of spot before, as I referred to earlier. I’m not a very humble person and never plan to be. I don’t do drugs, I have never done drugs, and I work my ass off every day of the week, including Saturdays and Sundays, before the sun is up and well after it goes down. I don’t have room in my life for losers like Jimmy Kimmel, and if put in the same situation would have had a confrontation with the comedy host. However, due to his past, Lindell is very humble, and it was just the right formula to turn the tables on Kimmel and keep the interview very positive. Mike won supporters, which wasn’t the plan of the Jimmy Kimmel Show.
The Proof is Clear on Election Fraud
Over the past week, Lindell continued to do well for the cause by hosting a rally at Mitchell, South Dakota, in the famous Corn Palace. It was a great event with thousands of people who showed up to support the launch of the Frank Speech social media site, which is coming on after a lot of trouble launching. The media reviews of the event were horrendous; they are worried that Lindell will disrupt their plans, nothing seems to be stopping this born-again religious Christian, and I am having fun watching it. They can’t seem to find anything to take away from him. Usually, with these kinds of big-time business owners, they (meaning the villains of election fraud) find some weakness, something you care about and exploit it socially to keep you from doing more of what you do that makes them worry. But what can you take from a guy who puts 100% of his trust in God and feels that the money he has made from MyPillow is a tool to bring justice to the world? What can they take from Mike Lindell when only a few years ago, he was looking for crack crystals in the carpet of his apartment for one more hit that he was desperately craving because he had lost it all? He knows what losing everything means, and he’s not in fear of it now. Mike Lindell isn’t about the opulent lifestyle his new wealth could give him; he’s about justice, which has these evil people in the government and the media very worried. There may be only 1 Mike Lindell out of millions of people, but that’s the truth of all these things. It only takes one to bring it all down. It only takes one sperm to conceive a baby. It only takes one person to give birth to a revolution, local, national, or globally. From my position, I see Mike Lindell as one of the most critical people on the face of the planet. The least anybody could do is to buy a MyPillow product from the guy and keep this new revolution of justice going because it is the future wave of freedom and liberty.
Well, I didn’t know it until the story broke that Kevin McCarthy was sharing an apartment with Frank Luntz, the pollster and what I call in my upcoming book The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business, a “bounty hunter.” Frank Luntz in the Washington D.C. beltway swamp is undoubtedly one of those. The rest of the world has known him as a consultant, which I think is a weak word for what he does. Consultants in business and politics are there to mitigate risk from the real stakeholders of an enterprise, whether it’s a CEO of a large company or the House Leader for the Republicans in congress. Those with the most risk to shoulder are often hiring bounty hunters to do their dirty work for them. It’s a common practice and is really at the heart of much of what is wrong in the world of commerce, which is why I have a special designation for those types of people. I dedicate a whole chapter to this enterprise, and when people want to know why our government is so swampy, it’s because of people like Frank Luntz. And when we look specifically at our current situation, such as the consensus-building against election fraud in the 2020 election, which allowed our tax payer funded intelligence agencies to conduct a coup against a sitting president who was massively re-elected. (For proof the results in the Arizona audit are headed in that direction) That’s terrible news for bounty hunters like Frank Luntz, so there is a lot of doubling down that is going on because the villains are exposed, and they don’t want to be.
I never cared much for Frank Luntz. He gathers information and uses it to shape strategy and opinions on politicians and the media’s topics. He doesn’t just work as a bounty hunter for political characters but corporations as well. So when it is wondered how policy gets shaped that often looks completely un-American, it is because of bounty hunters like Frank Luntz. When we put people like Kevin McCarthy into power as voters to run the Republican Party in Congress, we expect to get him as our representative. Not Frank Luntz. But as Frank often does as a bounty hunter is sample opinions of some losers here and there then give the sum result to people like McCarthy, who ends up listening to them more than voters. And that’s how a few bounty hunters end up running the entire town and is precisely why the Swamp, as we call it, has ended up being so corrupt. Trump was so effective because he didn’t use consultants, had an excellent instinct for getting to the right decisions with his methods and didn’t hire it out or solicit it. During his administration, the bounty hunter types were far less valuable. And they didn’t like that.
Bounty hunters make their money by shouldering risk away from those with a lot to lose. I have often said the primary effect of the modern CEO is not to have opinions and stand for anything at all as the head of a company. The marketing people take care of the branding. Usually, a tradition for a big company has already established market reliability. What the CEO does is keep risk from destroying what was built in the company. That’s why they hire bounty hunters to do their dirty work of opinion-shaping for them. And that’s how Frank Luntz has gained a lot of power even though technically he’s pretty much a Duntz; he’s not very wise about things. Bounty hunters like Frank Luntz only do one thing: to create advice that keeps their clients away from risk that might harm them politically or economically. Yet here’s the catch, Frank Luntz is a Democrat, or he thinks like one. So as a bounty hunter to the rich and powerful, he can then shape their actions to politics that he supports, which means that he controls our government. Our votes are not.
I have despised Frank Luntz for two occasions, first the way he set up Trump in 2015 toward the presidential election over John McCain. It helped Trump more than hurt him when Luntz asked him if John McCain was a war hero. Trump said his famous “I like people who don’t get caught.” Luntz, the bounty hunter, thought he had a way to knock off Trump at that moment, so he made a big deal about it. But what do you know, Trump thrived off the negative coverage because voters enjoyed that the then presidential hopeful wasn’t just another phony hiring people like Frank Luntz to advise him on public policy, as so many Republicans had at that time. The other time I wouldn’t say I liked Frank Luntz was on the night of the 2016 election, where the bounty hunter was very arrogant about what little chance Trump had about winning. But guess what, Trump won easily, leaving egg on the face of Frank Luntz in a big way. Yet like a bunch of idiots, the politicians kept hiring bounty hunters like Luntz, and the Swamp itself buckled down to establish a coup against our pick for president. By the time we got to 2020, Luntz and many like him who make vast amounts of money steering our elected representatives toward leftist cultures and positions beneficial to them worked hard to talk about polls favoring gun control among the American people. He also spoke about polls saying people want to move on from accusations of election fraud, when in fact, the true polls Frank is talking about are him talking to two bald men and a goldfish to get the “feel” of the American public.
McCarthy doesn’t know any better; he’s sharing a toothbrush with Luntz, so he has trust in Luntz, not so much in what the voters are thinking. That’s the bounty hunter game, to do what they were hired to do, let the chaos of the aftermath drive the sheriffs to fund another posse for the next villains. Yet as bounty hunters have always done, whether in the Old West or the modern-day Beltway culture, they make friends with the bandits to encourage them into trouble so that the politicians will hire them again. The bounty hunters never seek to solve the problem. Otherwise, they’d be unemployed. They only want to take the risk away from someone like Kevin McCarthy when questioned about the GOP position on voter fraud or guns. Or even illegal immigration. Frank will give advice that takes away the risk while steering Kevin in a liberal direction for the actual future strategy. The bounty hunters need villains to make money, so they always nurture them along behind the scenes. They don’t want to solve the problem. That’s why they all hated Trump because he wanted to solve the issues, and that meant he wasn’t calling bounty hunters to do the dirty work for him, which is where the real fix is in all politics.
It’s just as big of a problem in companies as it is in politics, bounty hunters are everywhere, and they charge a lot of money to take the risk away from those most burdened by it. But when you are a brash, battle-hardened CEO who didn’t pawn off the responsibility of risk to a bounty hunter, well, then things can get done, which is why Trump was so successful. It’s also why Frank Luntz hated Trump so intensely and is working every day to restore his grip on politics in Washington and within the media. But people are getting wise to it, and that’s why I dedicated a whole chapter in my book to the matter. It’s one of the most corrosive things in a mass communication culture, where bounty hunters are running things because everyone who should be in charge is too frightened by risk to do the job themselves. If we want to fix our politics, we will have to get rid of the bounty hunters that are in it. Then and only then can we expect things to improve.
I’m not making threats when I say the FBI raid of Rudy Giuliani on the same day as Beijing Biden’s “state of the union” is why we can never give government rights to regulate guns. The harassment and confiscation of the electronic devices Giuliani had by the FBI shows the massive corruption that the DOJ is capable of and how willing they were to break the law. Of course, we know, as I said in the video above, that there are lots of strategic reasons for the raid from the big-government types using the FBI for political terrorism. We are all big boys and girls, so we don’t need to talk about how unfair it is. It is what it is. The least talked about portion of the attack was digging up dirt on Trump, hoping to find something to build a case against his re-election. The Democrats, who are the bosses of the FBI, know history. Many times, a “great leader” was exiled out of their homeland only to gain strength and return for conquest.
Vladimir Lenin comes to mind before the Russian Revolution of 1917. Except for this time, the communists are worried about Trump coming back into power. Many Democrats are concerned about Trump helping Republicans win back the seats within the House and Senate. And even worse, they are worried that those Republicans won’t be Frank Luntz Republicans, the wishy-washy weak John Boehner types. But more those like Ron DeSantis and Kristie Noem. The risk to Democrats is genuine. They expected complete conquest of Republicans after the election of 2020, but that hasn’t happened. And now there is panic, so they used their pals in the FBI to harass President Trump’s attorney, the long-time well-respected figure Rudy Giuliani, Mr. Law Enforcement himself, and former mayor of New York.
I mentioned guns because it’s evident that we have a lawless society, and the Democratic party is in power and has control of our three-letter intelligence agencies. What other conclusion is there? Yet I have no plans to submit to their takeover of our country and their desire to undo America from within so that their financiers in China can conquer us for a greater good that only they think is good. Just as China wants to do everywhere, especially in Taiwan and Japan, they mean eradicating us any way possible, and the Executive Branch represents that attack. That leaves us needing guns to protect us from the lawlessness that this current government exhibits audaciously. I don’t want violence, but this administration certainly does, and they attacked Giuliani as a warning to us all to submit to their power and authority. If Rudy Giuliani can be attacked the way he was by the FBI and Biden Justice Department, then they can and will do it to any of us at any time. Their intentions have been made known. So why in the hell would we listen to these corrupt government types when they say that we should trust them with gun control? That is like following instructions from a robber to leave your house unlocked so they can pillage you and your family whenever they feel like it. Gun control is off the table in every way it could be. Suppose we can’t trust elections, and we can’t take back our government from these riotous thieves? In that case, we’re going to need those guns for proper management of our government because it’s evident that the FBI doesn’t work for America; it’s for the corporate influences and the Chinese government behind the Biden presidency.
Additionally, various audits are going on regarding the election fraud that occurred in the election of 2020. Rudy Giuliani has been one of the leading figures regarding questioning the election results. Mike Lindell has been another as well as Sydney Powell. All these people are being proven to be right about their accusation of voter fraud. That is yet another reason to attack Giuliani, shut him up and find some dirt that might destroy his credibility. If only they could get to Giuliani before the Arizona audit gets leaked. When that happens, and everyone will realize that there were large amounts of fraud in those five states that shut down in the middle of the night to steal the election and that Fox News had the inside gaff, which is why they called it so early. Many people at all levels of government could and should be in big-time trouble over that election. Democrats have no choice but to deny, deny, and deny, attack, attack, and attack all those who might point out the crimes committed. We are dealing with massive corruption here by the government that controls the FBI, so what does anybody think is possible with this situation? That we might ask them to stop being so mean?
What was done to Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, really all the Trump people who have been harassed and abused from well before his administration ever started was more than enough to justify a complete armed revolution. We haven’t yet as Americans because we still have hope that the system might work yet. But when we see a current president going after a former president and using the FBI to do it, then that is the Democrats begging for a war they think they will win. Because Frank the duntz Luntz told them so. We should all be insulted that this government has gone this far. They are going for blood, and they intend to scare us all so far that we will comply without defending ourselves, just as they do in China. That is where this playbook comes from. The raid of Rudy Giuliani was unprovoked, illegal, and the sheer evidence of foreign influence over our current government that is as anti-American as conceivably possible, and it’s all reprehensible and cannot be accepted.
We must deal with reality and not hopeful dreams; we are dealing with a vast evil that has no problem abusing people, even to their destruction. And they aren’t doing it in the darkness of night; they raid these high-profile figures at 6 AM to show their command of our days. They go for lower-profile people too, but they don’t make the news. Our court system does not work anymore. Wokeness has infected our corporations and entertainment culture to the point where they are trying to corral us all into the slaughterhouse pen for our projected destruction. Then to seal the deal, they promote gun control as a fix to all the problems they caused for their very mechanisms of evil. And the greatest insult is that they expect to get away with it because they always have. To my mind, this means that when Republicans gain control over the Department of Justice, which Trump had, but he was too good of a guy to use that power—the next time, we better use it. Otherwise, there will be nothing but blood to spill to regain our government and not find ourselves sold to China while sleeping, which looks to be the case now. But there is no room for gun control of any kind. There is no trust in this government because of the FBI’s behavior as political operatives for the Democrat Party. That fault is their own, and they have not been shy about flaunting that power. So, for our right, neither should we.
I have nothing at all against Indians. There are many admirable traits that they have that speak well of them as a culture. Yet my thoughts about them in the scheme of Westward Expansion is that they lost the war. And they deserved to. I can’t agree with the modern interpretation of these events. Like 9.999999% out of ten, most people do not know history enough to have an opinion, and that includes the professionals who teach at our universities. I have a unique relationship with history, and I can say that Rick Santorum was right about his comments in April of 2021 when he said that “there isn’t much Native American culture in American culture.” He has since walked back those comments due to intense pressure by the progressive elements of our society. They have made Native American worship just another political strategy to undo America as a country. Like their attempts to paint slavery as an excuse, North America should have never gone independent and, for unwarranted reasons, sought to destroy our Western culture with great effort using Indians as an excuse. Yet some profound things happened that fully justify Westward Expansion and America’s founding as the correct and moral necessity that it was. The world of politics is entirely wrong in its approach. For instance, if not for the real Pirates of the Caribbean, slaves today would have never been freed. It took the pirates of the time to invent the concept of freedom in the world, and as pirates raided merchant vessels from England, France, and Spain, they freed black men being stolen from Africa whenever they could. A democratic process was then created for the first time in human history that was directly learned by our Founding Fathers a century later. That effort then translated to America’s Westward Expansion, which destroyed the culture of the Indians. For the name of freedom, they deserved to lose. It should be celebrated, not regretted, for all the same reasons that it was Republicans who freed men and women of color upon studying the pirate movement. The quest for humans to free themselves from an ominous past of king worship and imposition of radical religious movements which hindered the human mind for thousands of years was necessary.
You must know who did what to whom regarding slavery or the conquest of “Native Americans.” The desire for freedom from cultures of oppression, which England, France, and Spain were in the world of that time, before them, it was the Chinese coming straight out of the Ming Dynasty where they roamed the earth in their giant treasure ships procreating with cultures everywhere. At the same time, they spread the wealth of China liberally. You likely didn’t hear about all this because they certainly don’t teach any about it in school. Still, there was trade going on globally between various cultures going back before Christ. As Spain was building little ships to send Christopher Columbus across the ocean to look for new trade routes to India, the Chinese for many centuries prior had floating cities bigger than anything previously seen on earth. Their goal was to promote the might of China. What we know about the modern Indian was directly attached to this effort. Many Indian tribes were created globally and were hardly native to the continent from its inception. The idea of diffusion from hunters and gathers coming down from the Bering Strait and settling the North American mainland first is preposterous. Before known history, even a few thousand years before Christ in the Middle East, Phoenicians show evidence of trading in North America looking for vast copper mines in the Great Lakes region.
I say all this for context because people upset with Santorum’s comments about Indians have pointed out the great societies of the Aztec and the people of Cahokia. The massive pyramids just outside of St. Louis are just off the highway there as millions of people drive by every day and do not notice them at all. Yet that is evidence of the extraordinary sophistication of global cultures trading all over the world. That is the same kind of story as the Mound Builders of the Ohio and Mississippi Valleys. We know now that these people were very large, some as big as 8 feet and 9 feet tall. We call them giants now who came from the culture that built Stonehenge and were mixed with red-haired Vikings and migrants from Germany and perhaps even Egypt again well before Christ was born in a manger. Lazy scientists who work in the Marxist university system over the very young fields of archaeology and anthropology are just beginning to scratch the surface of any global natural history. There is so much that isn’t known. It has been way too soon to judge any culture anywhere regarding slavery, native status, and the like. There is yet so much to learn. They typically associate mound-building cultures as Adena and Hopewell Indians, but nobody knows. With all the research that we have done, nobody knows anything about the Cahokia people who built those massive pyramids right in the middle of North America. It was all along a known trade route of the Mississippi River to the rest of the world, the pre-Mayan people, people in South America, and Africa, and beyond. It is agreed that Cahokia supported a cityscape larger than London at the time.
The Lakota, the Sioux, the Shawnee were not ancient cultures who built all these North American relics but were primitive offshoots of sophisticated societies that fell apart under the standard Vico Cycle. I always talk about the Vico Cycle and people who turn back to the primitive under a necessity for the ambitious to rule over the lazy who are glad to follow. So they became warring factions of hunter and gatherer tribes which is what met the first Americans. The Five Nations of the Iroquois were not ever going to form a great government and shape the nature of human civilization. They had a chance, and they blew it long before Americans ever arrived to create a great republic. Interpreters of history have it all wrong and did from the beginning turning the entire analysis into a political weapon instead of fact. And when the two cultures met, the Indians were beaten as they should have been. Their deep past was relatively shallow, and they felt the human need to be free of rule over tribal leaders and bloodthirsty kings. Of course, the pirates were made out to be terrible. Look at who interpreted history, the English, the Spanish, and the French, who were destroying the cultures at the time in South, Central, and North America for gold. But Americans evolved and fought them all off, and freed the slaves, and stopped the long history of tyranny in the world for the first time. The Indians as we knew them were run over by the process, but that had been going on for many centuries, and if it hadn’t been Westward Expansion, it would have been themselves. They would have destroyed each other as they were known to do. Indians weren’t peace-loving victims. They indeed weren’t the ideal utopia of Sir Thomas More and other liberal contemplators of the human condition. They were savages and muts from the world after tens of thousands of years of migration and global trade set to fail as all cultures typically do. And in that regard, Rick Santorum should have never walked back his comments—because he was and remains correct.
The Sycamore Twp Fire Department is threatening to sue the people of Sycamore due to the elimination of 14 full-time firefighter positions and 70 part-time positions. The International Association of Fire Fighters Local 3907 threatened suit against the township aimed at the trustees—who in fact are the representatives of the tax payers for violation of the union contract.
This is an old game and these public sector unions were warned that if Issue 2 was repealed in last years election that this would be the result. There were going to be layoffs of public employees, and trustees and school boards needed to have the option to eliminate jobs that allowed them to balance their budget instead of reducing their work force from the bottom up by seniority. This is the exact same problem that we have in our school systems, where employee costs and job security is the primary concern of the unions. In the case of the firefighters of Sycamore, they want to see the trustees go to the public with another tax levy, which is how many of these fire fighting positions have ended up paying over $60K per year exceeding what’s reasonable. The union contracts pushed off on administrations represented by the tax payers do not account for changing economic conditions, and in the case of Sycamore and many other townships, home values have plummeted, incomes have dwindled, and state money has been cut. The looter unions of the public sector expect their contracts to be honored by someone, they don’t care who, so they can continue to breeze through life playing video games between emergencies and having plenty of disposable income to live by. In this case the friendly neighborhood labor unions of IAFF are threatening with coercion action that would force yet another tax increase against the community or they will take the money from the community with a law suit, but they fully intend to get their money one way or the other. This reminds me of a line I read from The Fountainhead recently, where the villain of that fantastic novel stated, “We’ve fixed the coin, heads—collectivism, tails collectivism. Fight the doctrine which slaughters the individual with a doctrine that slaughters the individual.” What that means is that no matter which decision is made, individuals will be crushed by the will of collective salvation. This is the motive behind the labor movement—one which the average worker has no idea they are participating in, yet they are there, part of that double sided coin to invoke pressure against a community for the aims of international communism, and it’s all done with American flags flying from the back of the fire trucks and the illusion of patriotism.
This may come as a shock to many, but the IAFF 3907 has a very recent past. It was founded on January 5th, 1999. Prior to this move by fire departments to move into the international union backed by the AFL-CIO fire houses were backed by volunteers from the community. These days they still maintain that illusion, but since the 9/11 tragedy firefighters have been placed on a pedestal as heroes because of the valiant acts of those involved in the terror attacks of the World Trade Center. Promoted to the level of the military careers of soldiers, firefighters were given a free pass socially to do as they pleased, and for an entire decade during the Bush years, fire, police, and education levies were passed without public refusal driving up the labor costs of those employees to a level unprecedented in American history. Nobody questioned the union push by the progressive oriented AFL-CIO during this period because of “No Child Left Behind” as no politician wanted to be called anti-education, and certainly no politician wanted to go against the heroes of 9/11, the firefighters and police. So the two sides of the two sided coin of collectivism was played against the American people to arrive at a time where the tax payers can no longer afford the mentioned public employees, because those employees simply expect too much financial compensation.
This is all by design. The roots of every labor union, as are the roots of the ACLU, many newspapers, and most large organizations that have sprung up in the United States during the last 100 years of progressive influence, are openly rooted in communism. Not the kind of communism that became the USSR, or Red China, but the kind that started those countries on their current path. The influences of communism were also spreading in America due to the books by Karl Marx from the period just prior to the Civil War. Keynesian economics from England rooted in European socialism took political hold in the United States which greatly advanced communist thought in a capitalist society. It took some time to take hold, but by the turn of the last century, it was spreading. The way you can see its influence is by the term, “workers rights,” which is taken directly from the work of Marx’s Communist Manifesto. Many of the firefighters in the IAFF 3907 in Sycamore won’t understand this history—they’ll say they are not communists, they are—–capitalists? But they have forgotten, or do not understand the meaning, and thus serve the evil of communism without knowing it.
By virtually every chart viewed, public employees since they were granted collective bargaining rights in 1983 to today have increased their tax burdens on society dramatically. From the time of these public union formations of firehouses like the IAFF 3907 in 1999 to now, a very steady increase in the cost of public employees has taken place, particularly during the Bush years because of the conditions mentioned above. Communists disguised as political progressives layed in wait until a major crises before unleashing the full force of their social intentions—which is the complete socialization of education, police and fire departments so to fulfill the aims of communism as small encroachments over time gradually replacing American capitalism with world-wide socialism, which is the doorway to complete communism.
The reason people do not see communism for what it is, is because they have been breed to not understand how history connects. Collectivism is a seductive tune for the masses to sing, because many people lack personal courage, and the strength to stand on their own. Public education has encouraged this trend making it so the sensational are trivialized, and the mediocre are promoted. The only place for “heroes” in public education is in sports, because team sports are a form of collectivism. Notice that when people think of the NFL they assume that Super Bowls have always been around, but in fact the very first Super Bowl was January 15th 1967. At first glance I would say that football is the game of capitalism, but the team concept as it’s taught in public school is pure socialism. It’s the double sided coin of collectivism again, individuals are propped up to satisfy people’s needs for individuality, but entire schools and their students, parents, and staff are pulled into a form of collectivism, to gain their acceptance of the deeper concepts of collective salvation. Ever notice at a football game how often fans say “WE.”
Of course much of this talk is too sophisticated by a population that has been deliberately reduced intellectually to conceive of these thoughts, so they will simply rationalize their social positions by calling people like me “old-fashioned” and an extreme right-winged radical. But consider this, if Walt Disney was alive today and he and I were talking, he would agree with virtually everything I’m saying right now. It is not people like me who are wrong, it is those who have allowed their perception of reality to be swept so far to the political left that even the political right is left of center compared to the foundation of America. I use Disney as an example, because even to this day, his company is considered a mainstream company, his amusement parks are still the top destination in the world for people who want to get away from their daily lives. What do you think people are trying to get away from? Disney World is as close to pure capitalism as there is on earth right now and look at it. Costco, the store, is a very close second. My ideal society would be the world of the Epcot Center, in Florida. There communism is a distant thought and freedom of thought is encouraged.
But we’re not talking about amusement parks; we’re talking about the difference between communism and capitalism and the slow erosion that has been injected upon our culture and how people forget their history and have changed over time because they have been individually destroyed by the two-sided coin of communism. My position is to reject the coin flip all together. I reject both options presented to me by the communist infiltration of public employees and their mentality. I don’t want their service, and I don’t wish to pay for them under any circumstances. I could personally do better or organize a better system without the union “professional.” I reject the union end game of gradual communism and social supervisors. They can keep their double-sided coin of which they always win. The best way to win is simply not to even flip the coin.
This is where Sycamore Twp, Ohio finds itself. Doesn’t anybody question why an international labor union is heading up a local fire department? What does “international” have to do with Sycamore? The answer is nothing unless the taxpayers decide to flip the coin, and once they have, they find themselves trapped with a greedy labor union demanding payment. The communists who formed the union knew that by draining the wealth and value of the private property of American citizens that their love for possession would gradually erode away, opening their minds to communism. And that’s what the IAFF in Sycamore is offering to the tax payers, “pay us—or pay us, but staffing levels cannot be cut.” It’s the same argument of our public schools, pay us, or pay us. “Refuse, and we’ll take away your buses, we’ll take away your sports which will cost a $1000 dollars instead of just a $100 if you had paid the tax increase in the first place.”
Communism is the root of this mentality and you can tell who they are by those who say, “Worker rights.” Those are the dirty rotten communists of our day, the parasites who offer a coin flip of which they win either way—if they can trick you into playing their game—which most do. My advice to the people of Sycamore is to not allow the coin flip, to not allow themselves to be pulled into an emotional argument that allows fear to drive the logic of the tax payer. The way to get rid of an international union from your neighborhoods is to cut off the head of the beast and let it die of starvation. And if you have a fire, or emergency, take care of it yourself or with a volunteer group that you form yourself in your neighborhoods. Save your money for your own use, and never commit to higher taxes, because they will never stop asking, until you are simply broke and overcommitted. Playing the coin toss game with communists will always lead to a failure because the communist will cheat to make their point every time, and their overall strategy is to end your way of life using your friends and family to carry out the attack.
Evidence that progressives will completely lie to advance their “green movement” can be seen in the video below. (Check out the size of the driver!)
Many wonder why I picked public education as my target strategy to beat back the international terrorists called progressives who have decided to invade my country The United States. The answer of course is to protect the property rights that are pillaged by high taxes from labor unions operating under government schools. But the more fundamental issue for me is the content of the education itself—what are our teachers instructing our young about and why. The answer to that question set my target, because of an article I read in The New Yorker way back in 2008 promoting Naomi Klein’s second book Shock Doctrine.
If you don’t know Naomi, she is an articulate, well-meaning spokesman for her cause. She is typically soft-spoken and very profession in her presentation of facts. She’s also a radical progressive, which is the new name for communism these days. In that New Yorker article I realized that socialists were a very real threat to the United States and that people like Naomi—who is Canadian working aggressively with global greenie weenies to destroy American forms of capitalism with the concept of carbon credits and other regulatory infringements on a mission to save the world from mankind. You can see a bit of Naomi Klein’s work and beliefs in this video from the Copenhagan Climate Talks.
In the New Yorker article from back then it is easy to see now in hindsight what was going on, as President Obama hadn’t even set foot in the White House yet. At a speech Naomi Klein gave at the Bloor Cinema in Toronto, Canada copies of Socialist Action were being sold for a dollar each to the line that stretched to the end of the block and around the corner. As 850 audience members took their seats Klein took the stage and gave her speech that migrated from topics of fighting racism and poverty, working for education, international solidarity, justice for immigrants and solidarity with Palestine. But most notably in the New Yorker article was the picture of Naomi wearing a pin, “MOVE THE CENTER.” This nice young woman was truly a radical in disguise openly advocating war against America and promoting moving the political center more to the left. Now, four years later we have seen every one of the issues she mentioned in that Toronto speech played out in the administration of Barack Obama to a fault, and the political center has been moved very, very far to the left—in favor of the greenie weenie religion of climate terrorism.
School teachers would be one of the first since the year 2000 to begin to implement all those speech topics into the class rooms of our public schools in an effort to teach our children to become crusaders for climate terrorism and the success of that endeavor can now be seen in our young people—especially the Occupy Wall Street crowd. The progressive platform advocated by Naomi Klein and thousands just like her have corrupted America from within by an aggression nobody saw coming. And it started in our schools.
That is why I first went after public education in my efforts, because it is in these palaces of government protection and union mob rule that progressivism is passed onto our children like a disease ingested through uncooked chicken. Naomi Klein is one of the terrorists who advocate protecting mother earth while disguising her real intentions of creating global mixed economies that feature progressive socialism as control mechanisms. One of her featured targets in The New Yorker article was Milton Friedman as she went to great measures to explain why pure capitalism as Friedman advocated were so destructive to the world of mother earth. Her audience gasped in horror as Friedman’s beliefs were subjected to her scrutiny—beliefs such as no government interference of markets, no tariffs, no subsidies, no minimum-wage laws, no public housing, no Social Security, no financial regulation, no licensing requirements, including those for doctors. In short, I saw out of Naomi Klein and her minions of doom an attack on everything I believe as Milton Friedman advocated decades ago what I know is the only course America should be on, and I decided that I would refocus my energy to moving that Progressive center shown on her button not to the left, but clean off the chart back toward the right—but completely off the scale—because I’ve had it with greenie weenie, progressive socialists who wish to impose themselves on my life with their antics of destruction.
The attack by these progressives has not gone unchecked. In 2009 the Tea Party formed to push back against these progressive encroachments and I greatly support the cause of those organizations and other liberty groups that formed under this uprising. But I saw a need for more. So I set out to create Overmanwarrior’s Wisdom and to refocus my literary intentions in a way that would counter the strategies of the progressive terrorists like Naomi Klein who are intent on destroying a way of life that I enjoy—the American way of life complete with cowboy hats, work boots, motorcycles, and guns. I don’t want what the socialists of Copenhagen want for me. In fact, I reject their lifestyle and beliefs completely, and I want their influence out of American government schools.
Now over four years later the greenie weenies are beginning to show themselves as “watermelons” which Naomi Klein addressed in a recent article from 2012 where she openly advocated that if society is going to take climate change seriously, then the free-market playbook must be thrown out the window. In the article link shown below Naomi addresses her concern that the progressive platform is failing. In 2007—back when The New Yorker article appeared 71 percent of Americans believed in climate change. In 2009 only 51% did and now in 2012 the number is down to 41%. That is the result of the blow back created by the rise of the Tea Party and other patriots who have grabbed hold of Naomi Klein’s extreme left political center and yanked hard to the right.
Progressives like Naomi Klein have acknowledged that people like me who are climate deniers are not crazy—our worldview is under attack. I know many people who feel just as she stated in The Solution Journal, that any government intervention does lead to serfdom, and will bring about a socialist world, and yes—we have to fight it off. And that fight starts first at your local school where progressive teachers and administrators are right now using your tax money to turn American children against the culture of our country, and then it is at the voting booth where a whole nest of cockroaches have been allowed under our slumber to run up our national deficit to over $15 trillion dollars while they seek to control every single part of our lives. Their most recent excursion is, H.R. 3523, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA) which authorizes internet service providers to share customer communications and other personally identifiable information with government agencies. Bills like that require action immediately to prevent looting politicians from taking away the freedom of the internet as they have with virtually everything involving liberty that exists. Left unchecked, a looter like Naomi Klein will attempt to tax us all just for breathing air and causing carbon dioxide.
No matter how compelling the presentation is from environmental terrorists like Naomi Klein they can’t overcome one small problem—they need people to buy into their scam in order to succeed. But for the patriot movement, we only need to no longer feed them with tax money. All the progressive organizations of the world and their radical agendas require funding, and they get that funding by stealing it through taxation. Progressives need us to survive, we do not need them. So to get them out of your lives, the first step is to cut their funding so they can no longer use your money against you. And the very first place, and most immediate result you can gain from your denial of funding is to your local school where there are thousands upon thousands of environmental terrorists teaching our children every day how to grow up and become tree hugging hippies and social parasites with their highest aims in life to live off of welfare. Sorry, but that’s not the life I want. It’s an American life for me complete with big cars that burn lots of fuel and go really fast. The greenie weenies of this progressive assault against America can shove their carbon credits from Copenhagen straight up their “collective” assess and drive their smart cars to the nearest dump. The youth in The United States need to learn what being an American really is and not learning to become a global citizen praying to the goddess “mother earth.”
Oh, and this is the reality of the progressive movement’s stupid “green cars.”
