What’s different now as opposed to any time in the past is that President Trump is talking about real and substantial tax cuts, whereas the Harris communists are seeking to perpetually raise them, with nonsense like “tax the rich” and “pay your fair share.” Well, who determines a “fair share,” these government losers are addicted to spending like crack addicts looking for the next hit. When we look at our government and talk about taxes, we are talking about paying for more government that does less for us without expecting the quality of a job done. It’s a ridiculous proposal. And as the Democrats say the same old thing in an election year and we watch gas prices drop under three dollars per gallon right before the election, hoping to sucker people into voting for these idiots one more time, what they are more than asking for is more money to get a government that serves us horribly and to like it. And to like it so much that we suspend any expectation of performance, which is appalling. The differences between one vision and the other couldn’t be more stark. Trump is proposing to remove taxes not just on tips but on overtime pay as well, which is a wonderful idea. One thing that America could really use is incentives to work more, not less. What the idiots behind COVID-19 did to our global employment culture has been ridiculous. There are still lazy people who want to work from home instead of getting back to work over the whole social distancing policy, which has turned out to be a complete and total scam created by the United Nations administrative state losers and their schemes of social detriment. Trump understands from experience that economic growth occurs when people are not penalized for doing more work.
To the mind of the socialists, communists, and general global citizen Marxists, government expansion means a job without any expectations for performance attached to it. The purpose of growing government is to develop well-paying jobs that don’t expect to actually do anything. The pay for that job comes from the government’s ability to steal the money from the people it is supposed to serve and give it to people who have done nothing to deserve it. This has always been a problem, and people have complained about it since the beginning of the concept of government. The government is resented when it uses its force to take what doesn’t belong to it for service to itself. And those lazy in our society seek government employment to protect their ability to make a pressure-free living, which shows up in various degrees of corruption throughout all human activity. When money is made too easy to get through coercion, your political system has planted and watered the seeds of corruption. Trump understands, as any real economist does that by letting people keep more of what they make, they work more to get more, and the economy does better. But most people in government, especially those who call themselves Democrats, do not grasp that concept because they see government as the way to make the most money with the least risk possible. That’s why all these billionaires find refuge in the Democrat party, because the power of government protects them from the risk of competition, and therefore, the money paid in taxes is less than the risk of going toe to toe with competition in the free and open marketplace. For all these people, big government is less risky, which settles their timid minds from the realities of social performance.
But with all our talk of revolution, the tactical approach well before we pick up arms against a tyrannical government is to defund it. With the discussions of more budgets in the current and future congress, if we do not like the government we have, then why should we continue to throw money at it? They are just going to waste it. For all the money they have given to Ukraine, the cost of our more than 35 trillion dollars in debt is, for the first time, a trillion dollars to pay for the people who have loaned us money; why on earth would we waste more money on such a ridiculous government. That is the question that losers like Kamala Harris and the Obama clan have never asked or answered. They expect that if they need more money to waste on more growth in government, then we are obligated to pay it like some slack-jawed dope-smoking loser. And that isn’t how it is. We are in control, not them. And if you don’t like the service you are getting from the government, we can more than deny those funds to the people misusing them. It’s no different than telling a crack addict that you aren’t going to give them more crack to destroy their lives with. Government is addicted to spending, and they expect us to fund that addiction. When in reality, they should be given less to force them to reduce their growth into a more manageable and efficient government. The source of the problem is that significant government types have no expectation of performance placed on them, so they don’t see money as a measure to be earned but taken by the force of government to feed an addictive personality that leads in only one direction: corruption.
Behind all the anger at Trump is that this trend culminates in a genuinely accountable government, perhaps for the first time in history. We knew there would be pushback when we talked about draining the swamp. But the level of violence that we have witnessed has been obtuse in several respects that are simply unreasonable. The assumption that people would always pay these ridiculous prices for a government that isn’t even good would never work. And when there are surprises that so many people are turning to Trump to provide a much-reduced government that asks for far less money, we shouldn’t be surprised. However, the plan never reasonably paid for all these useless government employees. We’ve seen plenty of government workers who have gone wrong; James Comey and Dr. Fauci come to mind. If you interview the typical government employee, you will generally find the same kind of lazy losers looking to inflate their egos with the power of government service without the expectation of actually doing anything. And to be paid extraordinarily high for doing it. Why would we want more people doing anything from a power position like that? That’s why a less powerful government is the only way to go. We need a government big enough to do the work of the people it serves. But too small to impose themselves on the public as an oppressive force. We are not obligated to pay a fair share, determined by those with broken minds, to continue to grow something that is a detriment. With the Trump election, the government is positioned to reduce its size dramatically, and through the election process, we have a peaceful right to do so under the need to administer those resources as a country. We do not have an obligation to support the cause of global government with all its problems of corruption and ineffectiveness. And to pay for it with all our hard-earned money. Then, we suffer the consequences of having it. No, it’s time for a fundamental change, and perhaps for the first time in history, it’s within our reach if only we dare to perform the task.
Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707





















