Tag: World Economic Forum

The 400 Dumb Economists Against Trump: Destroying globalism and their wealth redistribution of looted American value is the top priority

I am happy to argue with any economist, especially the 400 or so who have come out against President Trump’s proposed tariffs on imported goods once he is in for another term of office, that they have no idea what they are discussing.  Or that their hatred of Trump’s tariffs is purely because it goes against their strategy of globalism, where the United Nations would control our managed economy.  Not the United States.  Just because 400 people say something, or even a thousand, it doesn’t change what something is.  And when they say that Trump’s tariff policy will destroy the American economy the first time around and in the future, some context is required to understand what they are saying.  Economics was one of my majors in college.   So was philosophy, and while in college, I thought both were disastrously stupid wastes of time.  I went to college knowing way too much for my good.  I had a very unconventional education up to that point, so it was easy to see what was happening.  Mostly because different kinds of people study economics and philosophy, it was easy for this globalist ruse to be concealed because nobody knew one from the other in their social circles.  But it was obvious to me that Marxism was written into the economic books even as far back as the late eighties when I was in college.  And I knew that because that’s all they taught in philosophy class.  For me, it started with a study of Eastern philosophy, which was meant to open the door to the Chinese way of thinking about the world, and of course, they were outright communists.  So once everyone was taught in college how smart the Chinese were, then students who didn’t know any better would adopt communism as their mode of managing people and, of course, economic activity. 

Western philosophy, starting with the Greeks, was rationalized into failure by discussing empire building, starting with Alexander the Great, and then studying the Decline of the West as Spengler proposed.  So I frustrated the professors of these classes infinitely because I had already read all these books before I ever stepped into their classrooms and had figured out what was going on even then.  And I recognized what was happening with the transition of the Reagan economy and the one George Bush was proposing when he talked about a “New World Order.”  There was money to be made in globalism, and by essentially robbing the capitalist economy of America and redistributing that wealth to other countries that were choking on their following of Marxism, which was detrimental to their economies.  Many people would make a lot of money off stealing American wealth and redistributing it to countries that didn’t have much of an economy, and that is how the communist government of China became such an economic powerhouse.  But it’s also why a country with over a billion people still struggles economically with the United States, which has only a fraction of that number producing goods and services.  The reason that America had so much money was capitalism.  The political left then, as they are now, was very committed to destroying the concept of capitalism so that globalism could occur and wealth would then be managed by a Marxist-oriented government in the United Nations.  Now, let’s fast forward to our present time and note that the head of the United Nations today is Antonio Guterres, who is an outright socialist.  So, things have been moving in that trajectory of thought for many years.  Rob the wealth of America and give it to the rest of the world through wealth redistribution run by Marxist, socialist, and communist governments orchestrated by the United Nations, with the World Economic Forum setting policy in the background.

When Mitch McConnell says that he is critical of Trump’s tariffs and supports “free trade” policies, he is essentially saying that he defines free trade as the looting of American wealth without any defense.  He’s speaking for his father-in-law’s shipping company, which is set up in China and is the source of much of his family’s wealth.  When you have Republicans like him, who needs Democrats?  But don’t forget, just because authorities don’t want to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 virus in Wuhan, China, doesn’t mean that they have a valid reason for it.  Don’t ask the investigators to investigate themselves.  They know as everyone does now, that Covid was a bioweapon constructed to destroy cultures with health regulations, and they were looking to bring down Western civilization with it.  During an election year in the United States, right after Trump clamped down on the trade tariffs against China, COVID-19 was released from China and spread aggressively into the United States.  China never locked down the way the rest of the world did, and they were pretty arrogant about it.  They convinced us to shut down our entire economy while they did very little because they knew the nature of the virus and why it existed in the first place.  And likely the most apparent straw that broke their back was Trump’s tariffs.  They needed to get him out of office so the trade imbalance between China and America would stay in the favorable category toward them, the looting of American wealth and redistributing it into the communist country of China.  It was Globalism 101, taught in the college classes I attended in the late 80s and early 90s.  And it was always an overt attack against America for the ultimately planned destruction of capitalism in general.

So when Kamala Harris says that 400 economists are against Trump’s tariffs against other countries to set things right in the United States, I would happily argue with all of them about how wrong they are.  Just because there are many of them doesn’t mean they are right.  The most valuable thing I learned in college was that most people are wrong.  Just because many people think something, it only means that they were taught all the wrong stuff.  And it only takes one person to set things straight.  But because of my background, there isn’t a single person in the world who can argue with me about the economy.  And Trump gets it; his tariffs are meant to reverse the destructive effect of trade imbalances with America and will restore sovereign wealth to everyone within the borders of the United States of America.  Globalism will fail dramatically because the Marxist minds running the idea must steal American wealth and destroy capitalism as a concept so they can rebuild America under the United Nations with a centralized digital currency they control from Davos or Geneva.  So those against Trump’s tariffs are those working against capitalism, which is essentially free trade driven by market conditions, not centralized socialist governments.  Those in America speaking out against Trump’s tariffs are looking to profit off the planned demise of America by skimming away wealth as a broker to redistribute it in the process.  When pressed, most people will say that they read Spengler’s book and were planning accordingly.  But Spengler’s Decline of the West was wishful thinking, not capitalist reality.  And they now fear what Trump is saying, and they will cry and scream about the tariffs against other countries.  However, it would be great for America if Trump put his tariffs in place quickly and aggressively; it’s not the American economy that would be destroyed.  Trump’s tariffs will destroy globalism and Marxism and put the value of American capitalism on the world’s stage in ways they have always feared.  And it will be great for the world.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Nobody Voted for Bill Gates: Those who control governments decide the success of civilization

The truth of globalism isn’t nearly as sexy as it might be presented in a new movie or novel.  When we talk about the bankers controlling globalism, the reality is that they make a lot of loans to risky countries and then seek the power of government to collect those debts if the countries default, and socialism gives them more centralized control over the results.  A free society might not be so cooperative as to help the banks recover their lost money.  Often, there isn’t a well-thought-out plan that the globalists of the World Economic Forum follow, which is of a grand design.  Sure, they have them, but they aren’t very sophisticated or intelligent, which is what many are asking these days when they hear about the latest science experiment by Bill Gates who has used his massive wealth to manipulate the world around to satisfy some silly curiosity that he has.  When we talk about globalism, we are ultimately talking about a centralized government that is easy for them to control as wealthy people, who can have the most power over people in general.  And the political ideology doesn’t go much further than that.  But in America, we have an assumption of independence from that system, which has provoked us to ask, “I don’t recall voting for Bill Gates for anything.”  Or George Soros, pick your billionaire.  When they get together at the World Economic Forum, they act like a bunch of kids collecting Pokemon cards regarding world events, and their intellects are just as mature.  But because they have acquired the power of money to buy government influence, they think they rule the world.  But then that assumption comes to a collision course with the American way of doing things when we have an assumption of freedom from a tyrannical government that is bought and paid for by some out-of-their-mind billionaire like Bill Gates.

Who wants some little punk like this to rule over you? But because he thinks he can buy your government, he thinks he can.

It’s not just our government that our Constitution was designed to protect us from, to provide limited powers to.  It’s also the kind of people who purchase governments to do their menace upon the world.  The government must have limited powers not just to keep other governments represented by nationalized interests in check but also individuals with the kind of wealth or financial institutions who make bad loans and need the power of government to collect who will take control of the government to work against our best interests as individual, sovereign, people.  When we set up our new country against British rule, we envisioned a means to declare our independence from these forces of control globally by limiting the powers of government, not just from the kings and queens of the world who wanted to control the colonies and the people in them, but the temptation to control entire countries by the whims of a few aristocrats from a created administrative state.  At the World Economic Forum, they have built themselves around not a government of their own but the ability to create a policy that would force governments to do their desires at the expense of individuals in those governments.  So long as people thought about some “greater good” defined by a few lunatics like Bill Gates, the powers of government could be manipulated toward the self-interests of the world’s latest tyrants.  When China says that it has the most efficient communist government and can get things done quickly, that isn’t a good thing.  They might express a track record of not having things stop because of the government.  If they want to build a new highway or city, they do it and don’t care what people think about it.

In America, we go way out of our way, often at great expense, to give people power over everything, from Grand Juries to executive offices like the President of the United States.  Of course, there are powers in the world who want to gain control of these things to do some Bill Gates experiment of changing our food supply from a meat-based culture to one that eats bugs.  But the purpose of our government and its checks and balances is to keep people from becoming ruled by a few tyrants who have gained possession of our government.  Since we can’t control the actions of other individuals, we must control the power of government that they might gain control over so that our fundamental rights of life, liberty, and independence are not violated as a free people.  So when China professes the superiority of its system, they are showing the power of government over people, whereas, in America, we have a focus the other way around.  Our government is designed at every level to serve the people.  Otherwise, we could unleash a police state to kick down every door, destroy every life, and gain control of every administrative function in service to the state.  That may be the desire of the enemies of America, which is to say, every advocate of globalism.  However, America was set up as a representative republic to preserve the power of individuals from the encroachment of government and those who might put governments in debt to gain control of their function.  What’s the difference between communist China and America? Well, one government has power over the people, and they like to show it off by displaying their lack of bureaucracy in getting things done, like a high-speed rail or a new ocean port.  If they want the land, they take it and don’t care who they run over to do it.  But in America, everything in the law is built around preserving the pretense of individual rights, including prosecuting assailants over a stolen purse.  Private property owned by people, not governments, is meant to keep value away from tyrants. 

So when globalism collides with individualism, and a country like America has all its laws based on the preservation of individual liberty, there will, of course, be a violent reaction.  People like Bill Gates, who is essentially a globalist madman with too much power because he has gained too much money that makes him dangerous because so many people in governments want that money, well then the only check on that power we have in a free society is to limit the power that government can have over people.  Our firewall is limited government because it keeps people like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab from gaining control over ordinary people, as was attempted with COVID-19.  COVID was a test by globalists to see how much power they could achieve over global governments to implement their plans of madness as central planners of the administrative state.  And because of our constitutional limits in America, we were able to crush that global assumption, which revealed many crazy plans that had been growing underneath mass society.  But that’s why we have limited government in America, and it’s the only natural way to build valuable things for the future.  The initiative does not come from governments and those who control them.  Governments must serve the people in general, and the strength of a country will be judged not by a government and its rulers but by the initiative released by a free people who can then produce results based on that freedom.  And it’s so valuable that we have fought many wars to protect that quest.  Including the ones, we are fighting right now and will continue to.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Climate Change is a Hoax Created By Financial Whores and Barflies: Those who advocate for it only want to control you and make money off your stupidity

It’s too tempting of a target to want to put everything into one basket and blame it, but in the case of climate change and the whores who advocate for it as a means to implement communism around the world, all roads go to finance.  I was recently in Columbus, Ohio, discussing important things with influential people. A few of those people were very powerful attorneys working on legislation language for wind and solar farms in Ohio.  My answer to them was why they were so excited about an industry that was limiting our electricity needs, not helping them.  Solar and wind power don’t produce enough energy to advance society.  It might help you recharge a battery on a camping trip so you can get electricity for two or three needed electrical devices, but it won’t run a vibrant economy.  So why were they so excited?  Well, because there was a lot of money flowing around investing in this new technology, and it gets pretty complicated, but many of the big banks and investment firms wanted to make the World Economic Forum happy as a measure of success and to invest in a change state technology and to profit off the dollar transactions.  For many now massively globalized investors, a domestic policy that only serves 350 million people is not where it’s at.  They are looking at options that serve billions of people and want to invest in the infrastructure that provides those services.  And traditional technology already has its kingmakers; they have all the money.  If you want to move it from their hands into yours, you need some social motivation, which is what is happening with climate change.  That’s also why those two attorneys in Columbus were so excited because, as whores to the nearest dollar they can get their hands on and become socially compliant, they were happy to be leading something that would give them some respect among the political class.  Many of those people are hoping to be on the invite list to Davos at the next World Economic Summit, or the World Government Summit, or a think tank of liberal communists who want to limit resources so they can control the economy and everyone who lives off that economy. 

I’m all for solar power for colonies on the moon and Mars that will need to provide power for a few bunkhouses and electric vehicles.  Computer work centers, cooking, climate control, and those kinds of things service a small group working from those remote locations.  Solar and wind power are suitable for remote, distant locations that do not yet have the economic infrastructure for mass-rate economies serving millions of people.  And to attempt to force those methods on a society and their economies is foolish at best.  But bankers are not very interested in science. But they are in power and stability, so they are always looking to make money from anything that can have an interest rate attached to it, and that happens best for them when you move money from one place to another.  And the fiction of climate change does that for them, which is the only reason anybody is interested in it.  When I refer to those two influential attorneys as whores, and barflies, you would hear the same kind of enthusiasm coming from two 22-year-old prostitutes working a convention racket.  They might see a couple of good-looking guys at the bar they’d rather spend time with as biological creatures of sexual lust.  But they look at the fat, middle-aged men with full bank accounts but no hair and bad breath from their chicken dinner, and they seek them out because those are the guys who are willing to pay for sex.  People who do things just for money are no different, making decisions in life for the same reasons.  There was no logic in bringing clean energy technology, such as solar farms and wind power, to Ohio.  If you want clean energy, the best thing is nuclear power.  If you wish to have a constant power supply to maintain a growing economy and all the power needs of a society of invention, putting more and more needs on an existing power grid, a fossil fuel economy is best.  But if you only want to make money from something desperate and to sell a lie to the public, well, then prostitution is the tempestuous vice that works best.  It doesn’t bend reality to be something it’s not, as climate change advocates attempt to perform.  But it does make a fast buck from gullible, lazy people. 

If we wanted to, we could terraform the planet Mars and other similar celestial bodies into the kind of atmosphere we want so it’s livable to humans.  We can certainly do that on earth.  There is even technology that can manipulate the weather right now.  We don’t have to be a victim of weather, just as we don’t need to die of cancers.  We have scientific solutions to most of these surface problems.  We know what causes atmospheres to heat up.  We can cool them down.  In the case of carbon dioxide emissions, it’s an easy problem.  Plant more trees because they eat up carbon dioxide and convert it to excellent, breathable air.  We have the means to clean water.  To scrub the air.  We could control the earth’s thermostat to feature the best climate we wish it to be.  I would dare say that we could turn off violent storms through upper atmosphere manipulations as they are forming if we wanted to, and we had governments who tried to solve those problems instead of exploiting the destruction to acquire more government power.  But we are not helpless victims of nature.

And that’s where many of these climate change methods start, at the occult level within the World Economic Forum itself.  Many of those people are still occult worshipers of old Mesopotamian gods, such as Baal, the rain god from Canaan and the main villain of the Bible.  Occult-driven personalities want to rebel against Yahweh, the god of Christians and Jews, and overthrow the foundations of religion in the Western world.  They don’t give a rats tiny behind for saving planet Earth and only scare people into serving their god and bending the human race over a barrel where the new gods are those from the administrative state who serve as communists to a massive centralized authority.  As the wealth of America is exploited through fear of climate change, there are plenty of whores and bar flies willing to make money off the robbery.  But rising ocean levels and holes in the atmosphere are controllable elements well within our command of science to manage.  People who want to control us want us as they did in classic societies who worshipped Baal and other gods and want us to fear our circumstances. If we can terraform Mars, we can maintain Earth however we choose.  But climate change advocates are about dependency, victimization, and ultimately making money off whores who will do anything for a dollar.   And at the heart of all that is a finance industry entire of whores who aren’t very smart but are ruthless in their pursuit of easy money.  And that’s all climate science, as advocated by a political class attached to the World Economic Forum goals, is all about. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Greatest Wars are the Ones We Haven’t Fought Yet: Banks in an alliance with the World Economic Forum have declared their intentions

There was a clear arrogance as World Economic Forum leaders found themselves winning elections everywhere in Europe as summer sunk teeth into the Northern Hemisphere, especially in England and France.  Populist uprisings had been held at bay, and WEF candidates were slid under the door in the quiet of night by a global election fraud apparatus that is the greatest threat to our modern age.  They had already performed their coups against leaders in Brazil and America and were looking to infiltrate every significant position globally.  And they were laughing about it after they found a way to join openly with the communists in France to stay in power with Macron.  If you knew anything about history, the world was becoming a major war.  But this time, it wouldn’t be America joining the wars of World War I and World War II or the various fights against communism in Vietnam and Korea.  Or the spread of Marxism in the Near East, such as the conflicts with Iran and Iraq, were all about.  But always lingering in the background of those wars were debt maintenance and the manipulation of banks to keep the bad guys solvent financially to stick around to become a significant problem and ruthless dictators, which was undoubtedly the case with J.P. Morgan and their relationships with the Emperor of Japan, Mussolini, and Hitler.  This new war that is upon us looks to be the biggest one yet, and the opening days of it have already passed us with the evidence of massive election fraud by a band of globalists looking to take over the entire world and dissolve all solvent countries into a state of their control.  And how do they expect to do that?  They plan to do this by leveraging our massive debt, as all wars in the past alluded to, especially in modern times, as mentioned. 

I would say, as I have for a while now, that the most dangerous element in the world is not climate change.  America’s Federal Reserve had propped up BlackRock to distribute printed money made through quantitative easing to heat the stock market to ridiculous levels on fake money and to use that leverage to buy up the boards of most of the world’s major economic contributors.  It has been a sinister plan much worse than anything that led to the creation of two world wars and the United Nations as a means to end all wars.  But when they say war, they don’t mean the classic sense where needless lives were lost defending the honor of a nation.  But the destruction of nations themselves with a fiscal policy that destroys all value at its borders and collapsed the economies without a shot.  No, the best wars are not behind us; they are right in front of us, and it will be very tough for many people in the coming years.  And America is the last stand for global independence and a tyrannically Marxist takeover of international politics on a grand scale, starting at our banks.  When people look around and wonder why things are the way they are and contemplate why our politicians don’t do anything about, say, Covid, which was created as a bioweapon in a lab in Wuhan, then released to the world, murdering millions of innocent people, the answer is a horrendous one.  It is one too terrible to admit to in the light of day, yet there it is in front of all our faces. 

World War II was all about debt and using it to manipulate the world to create a United Nations.  That is a sad consideration when you think of all the lives lost and how most of our memorial holidays pay homage to the great battles won and lost and the memory of fallen soldiers.  It’s terrible to think that all the fighting was essentially over debt.  In those cases, other countries needed money, and only the banks of America could provide it.  These days, however, America is in debt to the world, and that’s why there is arrogance in these global elections.  Even if we wanted to stop the tyranny, we couldn’t because our debts are held over our heads in ways that dissolve our sovereignty as a nation.  That is also why globalist-minded people, including corporations, have absolutely no reverence for the American Constitution because they plan to dissolve it anyway.  They don’t care about Supreme Court rulings or populist movements in general because they hold the debt of every American in their hands and can crush anybody at will.  And they know it.  The only thing keeping them from making a move now is the ownership in America of so many guns.  They have to do their attacks slowly, at the value of the dollar, and kill America at the bank.  Slower than they’d like.  Fiscal policy is our biggest concern in this modern warfare of international banking. Wars are not fought as we have been taught, but in ways we have never understood, at your local bank and all the connections to it. Currently, at 35 trillion in debt, America is over-leveraged, resulting in a loss of freedom. And the enemies of America want that condition. We are paying 12.5 trillion in interest over the next ten years, which is a significant problem. Much of the communist plots against our nation are being funded off these interest payments.  Many people are getting rich off America, and we must stop that if we ever want to make America great again.

Most of what we think of war is an illusion given to us as a way to mask the intentions of modern war to rule as a global state of a Marxist aristocracy, and they are well underway with their plan.  They have been eager to do as BlackRock has done in its partnership with the fed: use cheap and easy printed money to buy up representative government and, with it, our nation’s sovereignty.  How else can you explain how so many people in Congress and the Senate have become rich off salaries that don’t come close to producing the income level they are experiencing?  And to fuel the insurrection, the enemies that wish to topple America, from the perspective of centralized banking, point straight to the World Economic Forum.  And they are hostile in their intentions to use debt as leverage to destroy our nation for the benefit of a bailout by the world when the debts are called in.  With every dollar of debt comes a loss of personal freedoms, and that is why the world is marching the way it is, with America looking like a complicit contributor instead of an arbiter of justice.  We can’t afford to have an opinion on anything, especially to be isolationists as a sovereign nation.  The attacks against our country have been aggressive and consistent.  While we have been shopping at Wal-Mart for new electronic entertainment, our nation has been sold out from under our feet.  And until we can repay our debts to those holding the debt and making a lot of money off interest on that debt, America does not have the freedom to do anything but be a servant to the debt that our politicians have sold us out to, and our attackers in the World Economic Forum are planning to collect on a moments notice once we show ourselves resistant to their manipulations, globally.  So far, as long as we support the United Nations with much of that debt, we are given the illusion of freedom.  But we don’t have it.  And getting back that freedom will lead to the greatest war the world has ever seen.  And we are at the start of it now. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Josh Gates and the Secrets of All Civilization: Why the World Economic Forum is involved in the ancient site of Gobekli Tepe

I do a lot of important things over a week.  But as I told my kids while we were in line to get into the Josh Gates Live: An Evening of Legends, Mysteries, and Tales of Adventure at the Taft Theater in downtown Cincinnati, nothing was more important than the three of us going there together while my wife watched all the grandkids.  My kids grew up on Josh Gates, and more specifically, Indiana Jones, who obviously very much inspired Josh Gates. It was important in ways that most people don’t measure things.  Specifically, I wanted to know a few things about Josh Gates in person that don’t come through the editing of his many thousands and thousands of television shows and interactions through the filter of social media.  Josh Gates is a very talented and good guy who has done much with a quirky in-between media lifestyle.  My family has immensely enjoyed his trips around the world.  My kids were interested in going, so I bought some tickets, not knowing what to expect from a live show.  But I did get my answers, answered.  And it’s not so much what he said, but what he didn’t say as a very successful producer of several shows on Discovery Channel and the Sci-Fi Channel over the years.  He’s seen everywhere on earth, all the various political systems, and conducted paranormal research in some of the most haunted places in the world.  But as I spent time with my kids for that evening in Cincinnati and ran into a surprising number of people I have known over the years, as the place was packed, I was thinking of a video my youngest daughter had sent me by Jimmey Corsetti at Bright Insight, a video channel dedicated to the next generation Josh Gates, Graham Hancock type of material that permeates the foundation of everything and leads right to the doorstep of the World Economic Forum.  So, there was a lot to unpack as the lights dimmed, and Josh Gates came out with a roaring applause to confirm a mystery I had long been wondering about.  And it turned out to be a fantastic evening.

At the end of the night, Josh Gates answered a question from the audience: does he believe in the paranormal after all his adventures? His answer was a cryptic one; my interpretation of it was that there was a social narrative driving the finance industry to not discuss their fingerprints in the activities that most haunt the human race.  Josh Gates is a mainstream guy who gets to fly worldwide, filming exciting television.   But he has had to make a deal with the many devils of that industry who like the ratings, but it’s best to always keep the answers just out of reach of the audience as the Oak Island show does.  Take people on an adventure and show them lots of exciting stuff.  But don’t bring meaning or personal opinions into it; we’ll fund your shows.  Let people ask questions, but never give them the answer.  It’s the way that people who want to control other people control other people, which is why, as Josh Gates was talking, I was thinking of that Bright Insight segment that featured why Gobekli Tepe in Turkey was being protected for tourism by the World Economic Forum disguised as helpful, but in truth, it is to prevent further excavations that show just how advanced humanity has been for over 10,000 years now.  As a professional, Josh knows where the lines are, and he stays within them even if there is plenty of evidence that shows just how mysterious the world is. 

Josh Gates gave an excellent answer to the audience when he answered that what matters in all these adventures is the stories, not so much how true they are.  Philosophically, reality can be decided by all kinds of circumstances.  However, the value of a story in unlocking the brain is ultimately more important.  I was thinking of many mysteries that personally bother me because I know there is a significant game of control trying to keep all humankind from discovering their true origins.  Most wars are about keeping everyone so unstable that the official narrative of human existence can be contained in a narrative controlled by those who want to rule the world.  I didn’t get to answer Josh Gates when he asked the audience what he should explore paranormally in Cincinnati if he were to try after a person from the audience asked him.  I would have told him that most of the downtown area of Cincinnati is deeply haunted and has been long before the city was ever built, especially along 5th Street.  Fountain Square and Jeff Ruby’s Steakhouse in the center of the town are built over the locations of a giant Indian Mound that was destroyed to create the city, so the whole area has deep ties to a paranormal world that is much older than many people think.  Including the Taft Theater where we were.  One of the people I know who went there and talked to me the day after received a tour of the place, not realizing she was a ghost.  She’s been there for years and haunts people often, disguising herself as a helpful usher.  But for no reason at all, she took him and his wife on a tour of the whole place and showed him where all the people who had died in the building still resided.  I believed his story, quite certainly.  I have some “experiences” at the Masonic lodge near the P&G headquarters that more than confirm the presence of lots of paranormal activity.  That whole street from Mt. Adams to the Museum Center is a haunted hot spot, and Josh Gates could have an exciting show there.  But my only question to the storyteller was, “Did she show you where the bathroom was?” 

Adventure has many layers, and I do travel and see things for myself.  I admire how much Gates has been able to travel and return to tell about it.  My family loves to travel, and we try to travel together as much as possible.  However, few people worldwide have traveled as much as Josh Gates; his perspective is important.  We live in a haunted world, hiding deep mysteries that are being kept from us deliberately to maintain a social order conducive to the rule of a narrow band of aristocrats to maintain an illusion of ruling over us.  And that is why the World Economic Forum communists are suppressing further investigations at Gobekli Tepe and many other historic sites around the world. It’s the same attitude they have in China, where many of the world’s biggest mysteries can’t even make it out of the communist media market.  They want to be the god their public worships; they don’t want their people to know much about their past.  So, the real fight in the world is between this knowledge of more and the people who want to rule and try to control the narrative.  Josh Gates said that his job is to show people many exciting places.  And that the value of those places is in the stories they tell.  Through those stories, you can learn the truth about things you otherwise wouldn’t have.  But the real essence of the mysteries is under the world’s political order, which is where my interest is.  And I got more out of that little event than I would have thought, and it was a wonderful evening.  Josh Gates is a wonderful dude. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

War and Mashed Potatoes: Open borders are an act of war, and the aggressors must be punished as such

There is more to the border problems of the world than just attracting voting demographics.  In the United States, the assumption is that Democrats want new voters because they are losing their old ones, with reckless border security, and they intend to turn red states like Texas into blue states like Illinois and Minnesota.  And that is undoubtedly a surface-level concern.  But this isn’t just a problem in the United States.  I feel very fortunate to have seen with my family Notre Dame before it was burnt down by terrorists in Paris.  They are about to reopen it, although it will forever be damaged because of the history it contained; the cause of the destruction was globalism and the deliberate military intention to provoke open borders all around the world so that new ideas and cultures would burden the old cultures of nationalism and in that way, take down all notions of borders and achieve what progressives have always wanted, a borderless world ran by a one world government that identifies as global citizens.  With that known, all the attempts at such a cause must be viewed as a military objective as hostile agents, no different than when an Emperor of the past sent troops to conquer some foreign land so that they could acquire the resources of that territory.  That is how the Greek, Roman, and British empires and countless others were established.  Genghis Khan comes to mind.  What is happening with open border policies around the world is no different, it’s just being done on a scale we usually don’t consider, which is one of their strategies for aggression.   To override our cultures before we figure out what has always been the intention.  Which is to destroy all concepts of nationalism in the world and to replace it with globalism. 

Just imagine making mashed potatoes for your Thanksgiving meals.  The decision to isolate a potato and serve it as it takes work distinguishes it from the rest of the contents on the plate.  If you are looking for uniformity, you don’t want to isolate the ingredients when cooking; you want to mess them all together, like a stir fry or a mashed potato serving complete with a lot of gravy.  For those in the world at the World Economic Forum who want global communism and a centralized authority run by the United Nations but don’t have a military of their own, how else would they perform their task?  They have sponsored open border policies desiring to move migrants from one part of the world to the next to mix all the ingredients of the world so that the concept of identity is destroyed, and the newly displaced people, even in formally strong countries, will be thrown together looking for a new leader to unify them, and define new rules of conduct.  This was always the risk when transportation and communication worldwide made it possible; the temptation for the next tyrant to conquer everyone would prove too much.  But in this case, all the tyrants of the world have united under a common cause and set globalism as their means to achieve their tyrannies in a shared way under the banner of communism.  Because they at least share all that intention in “common.”  So there is only one way to view open border policies, as a military threat and an intentional world war against all nationalist concepts, nations that intend to maintain their identities and resist a global world order of centralized government.  The attack is no different than Pearl Harbor or any other aggression against American soil.  But since it’s innocent people being used as weapons, and not tanks and troops, people have been slow to realize what’s happening. 

This is clear to me as I travel around the world.  I visit Japan relatively often, so I see the dramatic contrast in apparent manifestations.  Japan is an island nation that is difficult to get to.  You can’t just have an open border; you must fly in or arrive by boat.  And it’s small enough of a nation to cover the borders easily by water.  Nobody is getting into Japan without them knowing about it.  So, they have maintained their culture in a very traditional way.  They are friendly to foreigners and are always nice to me, but they don’t give up their culture for anybody.  It is also why they are one of the top economies in the world despite the challenges of their remote location and lack of resources to work with on their island.  One striking thing about their culture is how little crime they have and how well their cities operate.  That is because they are mainly free of the manipulations of foreign hostilities, such as the World Economic Forum. Because Japan is isolated, the World Economic Forum has a hard time using policy to overthrow the country and to destroy its concept of nationalism.  The world has bigger fish to fry, and that is where the World Economic Forum is focused.  They will worry about Japan later once the rest of the world is under their thumb.  Currently, the game is to prop up China with phony money and then use the communist model to overthrow America and Europe.  The war with Russia is meant to degrade their concept of nationalism, and then once the domino falls, countries like Japan can be targeted.  But for now, the vulnerable countries are those who tolerate diversity so that open borders can destroy the concept of sovereignty. 

But for all those fools who say, “It’s for national security,” when you have open borders, your national security is gone.  And for all the money we spend on the military, what good is it if the real war is moving people all around the world with fake hostilities to provoke globalism in a kind of mashed potatoes presentation?  As I said what I did about Japan, I could say the opposite about England and France, obvious targets of globalism to weaken the former empires of Europe and beat them with incoming migrants from formally conquered territories.  Rather than fight them directly, the goal is to undermine their cultures.  And I have had a chance to see the progress over the previous decade.  The hostilities between cultures are purposeful.  Race relations were weaponized to achieve this goal of globalism.  And the only way to deal with it is to recognize it for what it is: war.  An attack against sovereign nations to overthrow them and, in the wreckage, create new laws centered around globalism.  Knowing all this, then we should be applying our military to these hostile actors and punishing them for their attack against our country.  Like Japan, a country is a set of ideas that produce good or bad results as they are applied to the world.  Japan is booming, and America has been.  Europe has been.  But this is just another attack on financial values, such as capitalism by communism.  It’s only that the approach has not directly involved military hostility.  However, hostility is different between races, sexes, and regional values.  Putting them all together as mashed potatoes to be served up to the lords of globalism is what the goals have been.  People have been slow to realize what the game is, and how to play it, by calling it what it really is, war.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Corporation of the United States against The United States of America: We are well into this new Civil War, which is behind the actions of Letitia James

I hate to say it, but there is a reason a lot of this diabolical behavior has been allowed to gestate in our American culture, where radical Marxists like Fani Willis and that goofball loser from New York, Letitia James, are permitted to cover for a maniacal menace to our Constitutional Republic.  We don’t discuss it much, but it’s a genuine problem.  I of course have talked about it for years, but to this detail we haven’t spent much time, because it’s a depressing concept.  And that is the idea that the truth of our nation and the nature of globalism is that corporations run it rather than the people.  And that our governments are set up to give the illusion that people are in charge, just like in the marketplace, but that behind-the-scenes decisions are made for the preservation of the corporation at the expense of everything else.  Of course, there are all kinds of things wrong with this idea, and I refuse the premise.  Not that it exists, but that it is the foundation for our rule of law.  Yet, when it is analyzed why so many people in government hate the idea of President Trump, and that they will do anything to stop him from even running for office, let alone being in charge of the Executive Branch, then we have to talk about this essential problem that we do not have a United States of America ran as republic, but a Corporation of the United States ran by corporate communists.  This traces back to the battlelines that the World Economic Forum has established, and we saw their footprints all over COVID-19 and the Great Reset economy they attempted.  However, the roots of this corporation idea started a long time ago, most notably in the 1950s during Eisenhower’s term in office.  He didn’t want to sell us out to the global corporations, but they pinned him down which led to his famous speech upon exiting office, warning us of this menace.

Not only do I know a lot of lawyers, but I also know many people with very high IQs.  And I know and have known quite a few people with IQs in the 200 range, which is supposed to be impossible.  I can say that I have known more than one to keep some form of anonymity for their own good.  Because they are not necessarily flag-waving patriots the way I am, or you might be, dear reader.  These are people who have been trying to recruit me for the last thirty years into the Sovereign Citizens Movement, and they have been in and out of jail and have all kinds of problems.  Not because they are dumb, of course, but they are too smart to play the game, which the rest of us do.  And that game is that America is a free nation run by free people.  They would argue that it’s a corporation, that our Social Security numbers are our only real names, and that we are all products of the state as the state decides.  And that government is run by corporations, which I think is beyond a doubt.  What we’ve seen over these last few years when we talk about the Deep State is these kinds of characters scrambling around in a panic.  Like the Wizard in The Wizard of Oz, Toto pulled back the curtain to the Wizard’s little booth, where he made all the illusions the world saw.  Trump’s was in that effect, Toto pulling back the curtain to the Deep State, and suddenly everything real started to emerge, shattering the illusion of a free republic.

I have told these people over the years that I do not acknowledge a Corporation of America.  I only recognize the American Constitution, and anybody who does not adhere to the Constitution of the United States of America will have a lot of trouble with me.  And that has certainly been the case over a long period, and there’s not much anybody can do about it in protest.  The courts must support an assumption that they follow the Constitution to maintain the illusion of a republic.  But due to their impatience, they have been pushing to subvert the Constitution for years and replace it with a kind of corporation human resource handbook intending to enable outright communism, which most corporations are attracted to for obvious reasons of centralized planning.  But strategically, I have expressed to all these citizen protestors, again, not stupid people, that I would always stand with the Constitution, and anybody who wanted to fight about it would have to deal with it.  Because I wasn’t giving up on it, and I certainly had no plans to be a fugitive rebel living in the mountains, hoping the FBI, CIA, and IRS never find me.  I’m a kick-the-front-door kind of guy, not a sneak-around subversive type.  So, that has been an impasse I have lived with for a long time, and my position on it is essential because of what we are witnessing now.  There are no longer a few random people talking about these things, but essentially everyone.

The reason of importance now to discuss it, in the wake of all that’s happened to President Trump, and the more success he has, the more panic that there is from these Corporation of America types, which we loosely call RINOs, Deep Staters, Administrators of the Administrative State, people like Mitch McConnell and other members of the House and Senate who have become very rich off politics.  People like Biden and his puppet master Barack Obama.  Who do you think put the terrorists from the Weather Underground in power who then put Obama in the White House?  It was not a random act, and it turned out to be the same people who used the power of government to steal the 2020 election.  It’s the members of the hostile Corporation of America, and they wish to keep their gig going without revolution.  But we are in another Civil War as we speak, and yes, people are being killed.  The battlefield is in our living rooms, school boards, and Chambers of Commerce.  And it’s not so easy to see who the good guys are.  But for me, the good guys stand for the Constitution.  Those against it are the enemy.  We are fighting for a free United States of America from the forces of the Corporation of the United States, which is just one door in the centralized planning scheme of the World Economic Forum.  Unfortunately, these guys have been in power operating outside Constitutional law for a long time.  And now we are ripping away their assumptions about existence, and it will be messy.  And the days of battle that I have told my friends over the years that I would stand on are here.  I stand for the Constitution, and anybody who says otherwise is an enemy of the United States, and that’s how it will be.  And they will suffer accordingly.  This isn’t a new problem.  For most of us, it has been in the background our entire lives.  But it’s not how it’s supposed to be, and they won’t give up their scam easily.  Which ultimately, is on them when they suffer for it.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Joe Biden and the World Economic Forum are Far More Dangerous than Putin: How the strings to the puppets are pulled, and by whom

I’m used to having a lot of people mad at me.  Over the many years I have been doing this, I remember when the entire country of India was angry at me for pointing out to them that Lord Hanuman was gay.  They didn’t like that very much, but it was true.  And they didn’t appreciate me saying it.  I had a similar experience when the Greeks were having a meltdown financially because they were choking on socialism when I pointed out that their entire culture was built on homosexuality and that Hercules was gay for other men.  They didn’t like that very much either.  And so it has been that way for more than 15 years.  I wouldn’t consider myself doing an excellent job if I didn’t always have people mad at me.  And I do it often.  But I have yet to have anybody come and tell me I was wrong about something.  It’s one of the mysteries of the universe, and I’m entirely OK with it.  People get mad because they don’t want to admit that something is accurate and would rather behold an illusion about something than admit to the facts.  And that was undoubtedly revealed in that disastrous press conference with Joe Biden when he came out at precisely 8 PM to do something he never does, and that is talk to the press who were questioning him after a damning report about why they weren’t going to prosecute him for mishandling classified documents.  (news flash, Trump was president and had the right to classified documents, whereas Joe Biden was only VP and he didn’t have the right)  Biden couldn’t help himself; he came out and was driven by ego, argued with the press, and even started to leave, but came back again to argue more before he ran out of gas after about 10 minutes only to confirm everyone’s suspicions.  It was a total set-up by the people handling Biden.  But why?  Why that time, 8 PM on a Thursday at the start of February, right in the middle of primary season?

What did we learn from this interview? One, the primary political party in Ukraine is Neo-Nazis, made that way because of the 2014 CIA insurrection led by Obama. They didn’t have any identity, so they adopted Nazi ideology. Russia was at war with the Nazis, so this is an old conflict. That’s not something they talked about in the news media that wants us to send tax money to a government that supports Neo-Nazi philosophy. That’s kind of a problem. What we have here is a bunch of globalists who have taken over Western governments, and they have created Ukraine as a state for their purposes. And the real fight is to remove these criminals from our government and regain control of Western civilization from corporate communism.

Well, at that precise moment in Russia, Tucker Carlson, the new Julian Assange, and at this moment, the most notable reporter in the world, was interviewing Vladimir Putin, much to the melting faces of those committed to the World Economic Forum tyrannies around the globe.  They had propped up Putin to be their straw man over the Russian invasion of Ukraine, where lots of crimes have been committed, and the war gave them an excellent cover story.  And ironically, the history of the Putin invasion is the same kind of strings on puppets that we were seeing at the precise moment with President Biden.  I pointed out to everyone listening at the time that these same characters were provoking Putin into attacking Ukraine because NATO was being set up on the Russian border, and they were poking the wasp nest, purposely for a political philosophy of globalism against any nation claiming nationalized status.  It’s the same general philosophy that we see on America’s southern border, where migrants are being pushed and funded to invade the sovereignty of our nation to collapse the concept of national borders in favor of a one-world government run by the United Nations and fueled by the World Economic Forum.  Everyone knew what Putin would do, so they did it, and the war was started, and the money laundering through Ukraine began, using the war as the cover story.  Do you see the pattern here, dear reader?  The playbook is well-known now; they think you are too stupid to notice. 

The truth often hurts, so people avoid it, which then bad guys exploit to commit mass crime

Biden is down in the polls, and he was a perfectly sacrificial victim to the bigger story, which was that Tucker was interviewing Putin, and the controllers of the world didn’t want that interview to happen.  So they pushed Biden out at the same time slot to do something he never would otherwise do, and the story around the world wasn’t about Putin.  It was about how old Biden was, and the corporate news cycles took the bait and ran with it like they were predicted and trained to do.  That, too, comes from their playbook, just as it would in football if you are on fourth down but only have less than 5 yards to go for a first down; you perform a hard count to draw an aggressive defense offside.  Everyone knew that Biden’s ego would propel him into several acts of disastrous foolishness, which was astonishing.  And it did soak up the news cycle.  And the same happened with Putin when he was drawn to attack Ukraine through NATO bait.  And in the scheme of things, the Putin interview with Tucker Carlson was far more dangerous than losing a puppet president in America who was projected to lose to Trump again anyway.  For the New World Order, the most pressing control they had to exert was to take the Putin interview off the front page because they needed to keep people from learning the truth about Putin. After all, he was their cover story for many terrible crimes going on in Ukraine for hundreds of very sinister reasons.  So people were left scratching their heads, bewildered by what they were seeing, but the truth was that we noticed how the puppets were maneuvered behind the stage for a change, and people had many questions. 

Said a spokesman for the New World Order

As it usually is, I listened to everyone, hoping that somebody else would talk about it, but nobody did; I told everyone that Putin was just a distraction to the greater crime, and of course, people were angry and wanted to say that my statements were “unpatriotic” as if we had some unsaid obligation to listen to the Biden administration about anything.  Or to trust our FBI, CIA, or the World Economic Forum’s view of the world.  That it was somehow violating some code in America for pointing out that as bad as Putin had been over the years, the Biden administration was much more dangerous.  And to that point, the people who put him in power, to begin with, and keep him propped up on stage to distract everyone from the international corporate crimes that are being conducted right in front of our faces, audaciously, are supposed to be given unwarranted merit.  And like that press conference and that Ukrainian war, the malice is hidden behind concepts of patriotism.  For the good of America, we have to listen to the people who want to destroy it.  That is the logic and the assumption as it was given to us on that critical Thursday night, February 8th, 2024.   Never forget it.  Oh, I see exactly what is being done.  I have been able to do it for many years and under many conditions.  And people who don’t want to admit to such evil are, of course, upset about it a lot.  But that doesn’t mean it isn’t true.  The World Economic Forum and their puppets in government are far more dangerous than Putin.  And better late than never, we are seeing a desperation coming from them that has never been there before because they are losing their grip on the world.  And when forced to, they were pressed into a hard count, and Biden was pushed on stage to address a political problem, and they did it to cover up their bigger problem, Tucker Carlson interviewing Vladimir Putin on prime time on the newly revised social media platform, Elon Musk’s “X.”  Yes, these are exciting times, and a lot more was revealed than the bad guys intended.  Which, to the way I see things, is a wonderful thing.  The bad guys in the world need a Putin straw man to cover their many horrendous crimes.  And that Tucker interview took that away and showed people a different kind of Putin.  An ex-KGB agent who runs one of the most ruthless countries in the world with diabolical propaganda and brute strength.  But in the scheme of things, Joe Biden, his handlers, and the World Economic Forum are far, far, far worse—and they have a lot more power behind the scenes than people have previously thought. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Yuval Harari is Wrong About Human Rights: Understanding the nature of God and the Universe and its need to be discovered

When Yuval Harari said at a recent public speaking event that human rights were just a story, just like Israel is just a story, and the same with America, he was pointing out the vast failure of progressive thought and the extreme danger of letting anybody like him have any legislative control over other people.  Harari is the critical philosopher and advisor to the World Economic Forum, and essentially, they are all like him.  The basis for progressive thought is embodied in Harari’s statements and shows declaratively the main differences between their way of thinking and ours.  I have always said that progressive thought was built on the foundations of insecure people functioning from broken concepts of human interaction.  They look for a government that they can see and feel to do what gods used to do for people, to explain away the things they are most anxious about.  And they rely on technology to do what they mistrust in themselves.  Then the danger is when all these people get together and think that mass collectivism from diseased and corrupt people will then become the standard of the future. You have a dangerous and maniacal people, precisely what I say the World Economic Forum has been, mainly because they have listened to Yuval Harari.  I have made it a point to go and read all of Yuval’s books, as I had Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, and I feel sorry for the little guy.  The world thinks he’s some brilliant philosopher, but in reality, he has turned out to be an insecure person who needs handrails to such a degree that he is pretty much useless to the dangerous waters of life.  He needs to see and feel everything by touch to understand it, which is the foundation of mass psychosis, and those following him will find a life of disappointment in his wake, which the world is waking up to. 

This is important because human rights and whether we have them are central to this debate.  The World Economic Forum people, led by Harari and Schwab, have built all of the global progressive thought and the desire for Chinese-style communism around the premise that no human being has individual human rights granted by some god and that we should all be committed to the greater good, as people like Yuval Harari define it.  In the past, some high priests of Baal always proclaimed to understand these things, and sacrifice was at the core of their religions.  Often, they would sacrifice their firstborn children or have sex with a temple prostitute to appease the gods and see their crops grow, or that it might rain.  History tells quite a story about people like Yuval Harari who are essentially blind, timid people who build their entire lives around the constructs of their mass psychosis.  Then, people following such people having the same condition ruin their civilization and wonder what happens when everything fails rapidly.  Harari is one of the best-selling writers in the world right now, but that’s not because what he says is brilliant, but because he substantiates the insecurity that most people feel about their lives and its relationship with the universe along all dimensional plains of reality, and simplifies their lives to concepts that their feeble little minds can wrap themselves around.  And build reality and government around those weaknesses for the detriment of all.  Not to be mean or anything, but they aren’t brilliant people, and the progressive movement has its foundation along those lines. 

So to say there is no God because you can’t see it or touch it, or that there is no America because it’s just a story, an idea created by people for the entertainment of people, is to miss the more significant connection to the process that thought and imagination will pave the way for tomorrow, and the impact that people play in it.  And, of course, if there is no God or an America that protects the natural rights of human beings from the corruption of governments and other mass collectivist organizations, such as corporations, then there can be no stable foundation for global populism that is scratching at the fence demanding to be let out.  And to assure those timid types, they turn away from God, as is often discussed in the Bible when ancient ancestors, like Yuval Harari, found themselves too timid to see the big picture, which God was always trying to get people to see.  People always fell short, and God was very frustrated with those who could never quite reach it.  But what were they supposed to get?  Especially if what they were supposed to grasp couldn’t be seen with human eyes?  Should we have said there were no radio waves because we couldn’t see them or a spirit world? After all, there are life forms that exist on a quantum level and desire desperately to speak to us in our four-dimensional existence.  One verification that we can have that God exists is that those in the world who have followed biblical concepts have been successful societies that have advanced the plight of the human being, and the world for that matter, toward a more creative future.  And that the hand of God doesn’t necessarily have to be a tangible, material thing but more of the idea for which our minds connect across all plains of reality to understand abstract concepts that can’t be grappled with unless a higher idea of God and natural rights is embraced.

For those like Harari, who have to rationalize all their insecurities as people into science and a blanket of technology to protect themselves from uncertainty, government power and centralized control provide them with the means to navigate a scary world and then project themselves as the high priests of its order.  This is the role that Yuval Harari has, among other timid personalities.  But to consider him a great philosopher, only people suffering from the same disillusionment can relate, which is the gulf between us.  We cannot all live together in agreement.  You can’t have the adventurous spirit of the human race confined to the timid types of progressives like Yuval Harari and expect everything to work.  The human being was created to be what it is: an adventurous and creative entity that advances the universe’s needs.  The Bible captured this ambition in the best way that human writers could put pen to paper and transfer the information across time to our concepts of human rights to this day.  Once human rights are understood, the temple of thought that comes from individual imaginations can grow and perpetuate goodness for all to benefit from, which is why biblical cultures have much higher rates of good living than cultures missing those values.  And it’s always timid people like Yuval Harari who hold humanity back and regress civilization along the limits of the Vico Cycle, not because of the impossibility of science, but to hide from the creative demands of adventurers and free thinkers everywhere.  It is within such types that God is proven and honest and works to advance civilization in ways that are hard to see with human eyes, and it is over a lifetime that we must develop the ability to see beyond our terrestrial limits to the potential of a universe waiting to be discovered and understood. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Dummies of Davos: Rather than taking over the world they should be in jail

Yikes, this year’s World Economic Forum meetings in Davos were not very appetizing. Whatever they were trying to do, in looking like a bunch of smart people gathered to talk about solving the world’s problems, it blew up in their faces quite dramatically. As I say all the time, I watch the reports from Davos whenever they have them, so I have observed them evolve over the years. They are entertaining, and I enjoy watching what those kinds of people think, even if I disagree with them. Regarding the Davos participants, many people are naturally insecure about what they believe are “smart people.” The World Economic Forum participants tend to be highly educated, and the natural assumption is that because of their many years of commitment to academics, they are naturally more intelligent than the average person. So automatically, a barrier between them and everyone else forms, which they exploit to their advantage. Over the years, they have used that relationship to make a move for world domination because of their leverage over people who form across the lines of intelligence. The Davos participants are a group of people who assume that they are the smartest people in existence and that, by that nature, they should rule over those not as smart as them. They think they know better than any of the world’s governments and the people who elected them what should happen on Earth and how the affairs of human beings should be conducted. And because most people don’t feel very confident in having a conversation with academic people, all conflicts are avoided and the Davos types came away with the impression that they had a right to rule the world, almost as if it were an obligation to their existence.

I would say that such impressions of intelligence only grew because people didn’t know who any of those people were. But once you understand them a bit, you find out that they aren’t very smart, just as is the case with most academic types. Once that natural assumption is removed, and you talk to some of these people, you find out that they aren’t brilliant and pursue academic lifestyles to disguise their insecurities about intelligence. And at that point, the ruse falls apart. Which is what has been happening in Davos over the last several years. It used to be that nobody outside of their network paid any attention, except people like me. But because of their massive political tampering around the world, by attempting to take over governments by unelected bureaucrats, and their role in starting the Covid crisis, which was detrimental to happiness everywhere, people are paying more attention to these malcontents than they ever have before which has forced them, at Davos, to be more self-conscious knowing that the world was paying attention to their every word, and scrutinizing it. Now, with the freedom of speech that is quite common on social media, especially in the United States, the filters the World Economic Forum has enjoyed in the past aren’t present, and people are noticing that not only are Klaus Schwab and the gang not very smart, but they are radical leftists that are dangerous to everyone’s personal lives. The more people learned about them, the harder they had to work to make a good public impression, which did not turn out well for them. Because they are coming across as the phonies they always were, without the intimidating presence of intelligence to back it up.

Not that there is anything wrong with academics, but most of the time, the case is “those who can’t do, teach” certainly comes into play here. What Davos was this year, 2024, was a collection of micromanagers who have very little understanding of how the world works and what the people in it are really like. Like most academics who pursue such a life to protect themselves from social judgment, the game works until reality displays the opposite. It’s not enough to have theories about how things should work. But when those theories are imposed upon people who know better because of vast life experience, the results are never good for the academic, and that is the best way to describe this past year of events at Davos. They failed miserably if they were trying to show how smart and capable they would be running a one-world government. Rather, they overplayed their hand because of the level of scrutiny they now have to overcome. More people are now paying attention to their antics, and that pressure negatively affects them. Most of the events of the week were centered around building trust with the public, which they had lost. And their market brand has taken a massive hit, which I would say they deserve emphatically. Over the last decade, they had a public impression of being “elite” in the world. But now, they just looked like a bunch of out-of-touch fools full of untested ideas that would only make everyone much more miserable along the way. And in trying to overcome that level of public scrutiny, they made fools of themselves. It’s hard to believe that anybody used to listen to these people: John Kerry, Larry Fink, Bill Gates, and many others. But people are much less inclined now that they know more about these people. The brand of the World Economic Forum has taken a major hit.

My name for them over the years has been the Desecrators of Davos because they tended to want to desecrate everything in the world that was related to value and national culture since they desired to rule the world, literally being the creation of the United Nations.  Their fantasy has been to be like the United States, only a collection of socialist nations as opposed to capitalist-driven states.  And that they were going to shame and desecrate any lifestyle that did not facilitate their whims of progressive thought.  But their approach made their effort appear more like a day in the life of the high school homecoming queen who ruled the halls of the government schools with peer pressure and inviting people to her latest party as the only claim to power.  Once people caught on, they were fine and free to enforce that rule by doing many other things there was to do in life but appease some worthless homecoming queen just to be seen being near her.  I would say that these characters deserve a new name, based on their performance at this year’s Davos events, and that is the Dummies of Davos because that is the only explanation of their performance that anyone could make.  What they showed to the world was dumb.  It is hardly the kind of behavior that would cause people to want to follow them and change their governments to appease their wishes.  What we know now is that most of those participants weren’t only dumb, but they should be under investigation or in jail for the mass destruction they have sponsored as part of their globalist social experiments that went wrong.  Law enforcement within the countries affected should arrest them and lock them away before they could do more harm.  And that the Dummies of Davos could be prevented from further harm in the critical years to come.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707