The truth of globalism isn’t nearly as sexy as it might be presented in a new movie or novel. When we talk about the bankers controlling globalism, the reality is that they make a lot of loans to risky countries and then seek the power of government to collect those debts if the countries default, and socialism gives them more centralized control over the results. A free society might not be so cooperative as to help the banks recover their lost money. Often, there isn’t a well-thought-out plan that the globalists of the World Economic Forum follow, which is of a grand design. Sure, they have them, but they aren’t very sophisticated or intelligent, which is what many are asking these days when they hear about the latest science experiment by Bill Gates who has used his massive wealth to manipulate the world around to satisfy some silly curiosity that he has. When we talk about globalism, we are ultimately talking about a centralized government that is easy for them to control as wealthy people, who can have the most power over people in general. And the political ideology doesn’t go much further than that. But in America, we have an assumption of independence from that system, which has provoked us to ask, “I don’t recall voting for Bill Gates for anything.” Or George Soros, pick your billionaire. When they get together at the World Economic Forum, they act like a bunch of kids collecting Pokemon cards regarding world events, and their intellects are just as mature. But because they have acquired the power of money to buy government influence, they think they rule the world. But then that assumption comes to a collision course with the American way of doing things when we have an assumption of freedom from a tyrannical government that is bought and paid for by some out-of-their-mind billionaire like Bill Gates.
It’s not just our government that our Constitution was designed to protect us from, to provide limited powers to. It’s also the kind of people who purchase governments to do their menace upon the world. The government must have limited powers not just to keep other governments represented by nationalized interests in check but also individuals with the kind of wealth or financial institutions who make bad loans and need the power of government to collect who will take control of the government to work against our best interests as individual, sovereign, people. When we set up our new country against British rule, we envisioned a means to declare our independence from these forces of control globally by limiting the powers of government, not just from the kings and queens of the world who wanted to control the colonies and the people in them, but the temptation to control entire countries by the whims of a few aristocrats from a created administrative state. At the World Economic Forum, they have built themselves around not a government of their own but the ability to create a policy that would force governments to do their desires at the expense of individuals in those governments. So long as people thought about some “greater good” defined by a few lunatics like Bill Gates, the powers of government could be manipulated toward the self-interests of the world’s latest tyrants. When China says that it has the most efficient communist government and can get things done quickly, that isn’t a good thing. They might express a track record of not having things stop because of the government. If they want to build a new highway or city, they do it and don’t care what people think about it.
In America, we go way out of our way, often at great expense, to give people power over everything, from Grand Juries to executive offices like the President of the United States. Of course, there are powers in the world who want to gain control of these things to do some Bill Gates experiment of changing our food supply from a meat-based culture to one that eats bugs. But the purpose of our government and its checks and balances is to keep people from becoming ruled by a few tyrants who have gained possession of our government. Since we can’t control the actions of other individuals, we must control the power of government that they might gain control over so that our fundamental rights of life, liberty, and independence are not violated as a free people. So when China professes the superiority of its system, they are showing the power of government over people, whereas, in America, we have a focus the other way around. Our government is designed at every level to serve the people. Otherwise, we could unleash a police state to kick down every door, destroy every life, and gain control of every administrative function in service to the state. That may be the desire of the enemies of America, which is to say, every advocate of globalism. However, America was set up as a representative republic to preserve the power of individuals from the encroachment of government and those who might put governments in debt to gain control of their function. What’s the difference between communist China and America? Well, one government has power over the people, and they like to show it off by displaying their lack of bureaucracy in getting things done, like a high-speed rail or a new ocean port. If they want the land, they take it and don’t care who they run over to do it. But in America, everything in the law is built around preserving the pretense of individual rights, including prosecuting assailants over a stolen purse. Private property owned by people, not governments, is meant to keep value away from tyrants.
So when globalism collides with individualism, and a country like America has all its laws based on the preservation of individual liberty, there will, of course, be a violent reaction. People like Bill Gates, who is essentially a globalist madman with too much power because he has gained too much money that makes him dangerous because so many people in governments want that money, well then the only check on that power we have in a free society is to limit the power that government can have over people. Our firewall is limited government because it keeps people like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab from gaining control over ordinary people, as was attempted with COVID-19. COVID was a test by globalists to see how much power they could achieve over global governments to implement their plans of madness as central planners of the administrative state. And because of our constitutional limits in America, we were able to crush that global assumption, which revealed many crazy plans that had been growing underneath mass society. But that’s why we have limited government in America, and it’s the only natural way to build valuable things for the future. The initiative does not come from governments and those who control them. Governments must serve the people in general, and the strength of a country will be judged not by a government and its rulers but by the initiative released by a free people who can then produce results based on that freedom. And it’s so valuable that we have fought many wars to protect that quest. Including the ones, we are fighting right now and will continue to.
Rich Hoffman
Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707
The Overmanwarrior 