The Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, has been acquitted of the charges of impeachment levied against him by the former Bush political machine. This should be a lesson that everyone should take note of. The old Republican Party, the one of Mitt Romney, and other RINOs like him, John Kasich comes to mind, is over. For anybody who wants to survive in politics going into the future, you better get right with the direction of the world.
The case against Paxton began back in 2015 when he was indicted on three counts of securities fraud and one count of failure to register with the state securities board. The charges were related to Paxton’s involvement with a company called Servergy, which he allegedly promoted without disclosing that he was receiving commissions for his efforts.
Despite the accusations, Paxton maintained his innocence throughout the trial. His defense team argued that the charges were politically motivated and that he had not broken any laws. In the end, the jury agreed with Paxton’s defense and found him not guilty on all counts.
While some people are celebrating the verdict, others are frustrated and disappointed. Many believe that the justice system has failed to hold Paxton accountable for his actions and that he has gotten away with a serious crime, as the Bush family had hoped to use against him.
There are also concerns that the verdict could set a dangerous precedent, sending a message that public officials can get away with unethical and illegal behavior without any consequences.
Despite these concerns, Paxton has maintained that he is innocent and that justice has been served. He has thanked his supporters for standing by him throughout the trial and has vowed to continue fighting for the people of Texas.
Get ready, there will be a long string of these types of MAGA acquittals in the year to come. And Trump is going to win in a landslide election. And all those who performed as bad guys across the world will have revenge coming their way, as is perfectly justified by their own actions. That revenge will come nationally, statewide, and locally. And many will be in shock. But they have it coming because of what they did.
It’s all About Politics and candidates who are afraid to let people see who they really are in a setting they can’t control
Supposedly, there was a meeting at the West Chester Tea Party at the St. Gertrude the Great Catholic Church on September 5th, where accused vitriolic hatred toward the Jewish people was expressed in antisemitic rhetoric, and it was a news story that gained much attention. And it was members of the “Republican Party” who tipped off the Cincinnati Jewish Community Relations Council, pressing them to denounce the West Chester Tea Party for its actions. Apparently, there was a guest at that September 5th meeting where topics about the Jewish people’s role in the world came up. This Jewish organization wanted to attach that discussion to a form of controlled speech that we see as such a strategy of the political left, where they determine what parameters of debate anybody is allowed to have. Anyone who dares to step outside those boundaries will then be attacked publicly, such as what is being attempted by the West Chester Tea Party. And if that was all it was, we could perhaps overlook it. However, I have a long affiliation with the West Chester Tea Party and Tea Party groups in general, and of course, as Paul Harvey used to say, “there’s the rest of the story.” This isn’t about hate speech being expressed over a controversial speaker. But I would say this is all about the West Chester Tea Party coming out and not endorsing Lynda O’Conner for the Lakota school board and ensuring people knew about it. I wrote an article that has been seen by many thousands of people on August 27th, 2023, establishing that the West Chester Tea Party would not endorse Lynda for her next run for the school board. So just a few days later, at this September 5th meeting, supporters of Lynda were looking for something to attempt to water down that lack of endorsement because Lynda has been affiliated with the West Chester Tea Party for over a decade. And the Tea Party just didn’t become an anti-semantic group a few weeks ago.
How do I know all that? Well, because I know all the people involved and how it works. I know how phone calls are made and the favors from the media are granted. I understand that the West Chester Tea Party is an open, free-speech-oriented group and that the caricature created by an institutionalized religious group does not reflect who they are. Many tempers have flared in the background over their lack of endorsement. I’ve heard many of them myself and I just let it ride out. I can understand Lynda’s feelings being hurt, but she has brand damage that she did to herself. So getting mad at the West Chester Tea Party isn’t a rational expression of justice, but that has been the byproduct of their emphatic refusal to not endorse her. We keep hearing about how small the West Chester Tea Party is, yet so many people are concerned about what they say and when they say it as if they are rationalizing to themselves its importance in the community. But I like the Tea Party people quite a lot and know how they work, and they are as far from a hate group as you can get. But I do know they hate one thing I share with them. If hate is the correct expression, which I think it is, we all hate corruption, and this kind of story is dripping wet with just the sort of corruption that has targeted RINOs in the Republican Party, and that is the real essence of this story.
I write many articles, many of which are about religion. Some of them, the West Chester Tea Party, has spread around their network, which is undoubtedly part of the criticism toward them by these institutionalized groups. I’ve even specifically addressed the Jewish issue as conspiracy theorists think of it because it’s a natural part of modern politics. I love the Jewish people and have said so many times. Jesus was Jewish. We wouldn’t have a Bible if not for the Jewish people. I even recently wrote an article about why we should all participate in Jewish rituals such as eating unleavened bread. Any criticism that was expressed falls under the general failures of institutionalism, which is a much larger issue. And, of course, those who seek refuge in institutionalism to hide their levels of corruption are at the heart of the matter here, and the perpetrators of injustice are playing a dangerous game that is falling apart in this second decade of this new century. The political game of controlled free speech. To censor people based on what they say and do, as if institutionalism could control people’s thoughts through the act of peer acceptance. This isn’t a new game; it’s an outdated one. And the 2010s want their political games back. Because in the increasing MAGA movement where President Trump continues to be the leader of the Republican Party, these games are exactly why there is a severe hatred of RINOs representing people in politics. That is precisely why the West Chester Tea Party made sure to distance themselves from their long affiliation with Lynda O’Conner once they found out she was running again, because of the many mistakes she has made that they couldn’t endorse.
We no longer live in a world where people care what the newspapers say or the television media in a city. This idea of ruling over others with hurt feelings is what created the mess we are in presently, and what has given politics a bad name. So, any hope that this story would destroy the West Chester Tea Party, by the established RINOs who want their party back, will only blow up in their faces. The hope was to force anybody to crush free speech to stay within the parameters of institutionalized controls, which is expected of the West Chester Tea Party, to apologize, and condemn members with opinions. Then, they minimize their message so that the RINO faction of the Republican Party can gain back some respect that they have lost. Because of these games, the West Chester Tea Party is still around and a vital force that works in the background, especially for Central Committee members. Party politics is never going back to what it used to be. People are not happy with it. And they certainly don’t appreciate being used by political figures to get elected, then to have those elected representatives turn away from the freedom movement, and align themselves with institutionalized politics. And that is the merit of this entire West Chester Tea Party issue. They have nothing to apologize for. I think they will gain members with this news media coverage. But more than anything, they will gain respect for their position against Lynda O’Conner and other political figures who have turned away from the Tea Party ways and hope to wipe their guilt away as Judas did after taking money to sell out Jesus. When the responsibility doesn’t go away from the reflection in the mirror, getting rid of the mirror is all too tempting. But the reflection comes in many forms, not just the bathroom mirror or a news media that is already a poor reflection of actuality.
There is no foreign policy in America that doesn’t deal with the problem of the World Economic Forum and its terrorism worldwide as a government that doesn’t see itself as a government. Anything that doesn’t deal with the critical problem isn’t serious about foreign policy. This ridiculous idea that America is the beacon of freedom for countries worldwide is a stupid premise by stupid people to serve their purposes ultimately. America doesn’t need to be involved in a bunch of foreign wars, when it can’t take care of itself, which is the state of our present condition. This has been coming up a lot lately, especially since Trump has had an America First foreign policy, which Vivek Ramaswamy has adopted in his campaign. As opposed to Nikki Haley who wants to be involved everywhere, wherever trouble is started, anywhere in the world. The classic idea is that America is the parent of the world and has to settle matters wherever there is trouble, and those settlements involve tanks and troops, by whatever means necessary. We are much brighter now than we were in the past, we have grown a lot as a country after a lot of disappointments. Globalism has not been a wise strategy, and America has been used like a cheap whore by the world for all kinds of nefarious reasons. But we are not that pre-World War II America who runs around the world like Captain America solving problems that everyone else started, and that is the general belief of the typical neocon, as the term has incorrectly been used for several decades now. The conservatives believe that it is the task of Americans to be the world’s police officers, while moderates believe we shouldn’t be. And that to prove your conservative nature, you must accept this premise of all wars everywhere by anybody.
It would be hard for anybody to claim to be more conservative than me. But I do not accept the definition of America’s role in foreign wars. I see a trick that has occurred where our reports for things were given to us by the enemy, the real enemies out there who hide between sentences in history books and are never really discussed, as they should be. And that is the type of people calling themselves globalists who set up this mess. In the modern sense, the World Economic Forum has taken over the front for global communism, the preferred economic standard for all their efforts. It is through banking and finance in general that the greatest threat to the world resides. It’s not in some puppet tyrant by a small country somewhere yacking on about nuclear weapons, when the real goal is to attack capitalism by taking away the power that fuels it. It’s all been a shell game, just as nuclear energy has been criticized because it reminds people of nuclear weapons. The manipulations in our culture come from the real terrorists who have warped our definitions of things to serve their purposes. Such as the “neocon” terminology. You can’t be a “real conservative” if you don’t support every foreign war that the World Economic Forum starts around the world. It’s no different than some stupid kid in grade school telling someone else that they aren’t cool if they don’t have the latest Nike brand of tennis shoes. But the term itself is worthless and has nothing to do with conservative values because it requires a massive big government to have a global military and support any war efforts. We have allowed other people, especially the media culture, to define what we are as Americans, and that has been destructive; it has directed our politics essentially down the road of big government centrally managed by ultimate globalists in the World Economic Forum.
The real threat to the world, especially America, comes through finance, where Marxist-trained professionals have already corrupted everything beyond reason. And it is the biggest issue on the ballot of 2024, this concept of whether Americans rule themselves or will be the latest victims of globalism. It was all established years ago by the book Tragedy and Hope and was most obvious in the Rhodes scholarship programs. Colleges have been oozing this material for years, and the ultimate result is that most people don’t understand the meaning of anything anymore. Pick the neocon political route in life, like Nikki Haley and Lindsey Graham, and you must expand government and spend infinite amounts of money to meet every challenge wherever they are. Avoid that path, and you must pay unlimited cash and expand government reach to build an administrative state to keep the Deep State happy and hidden behind layers and layers of red tape that nobody ever sees. And how could you? When you are so busy trying to get a building permit for a garage addition, who has time to see what a menace a deep state truly is that releases bioweapons into the public to control population growth, or that some ridiculous concept of “democracy” has been long destroyed with rigged elections that the public never had control of. While we debate whether we should send money to Ukraine to serve the interests of globalism, we hide the nasty stuff in our own country with ridiculous discussions about “trans rights” during reading hours in public schools with kids. And that the political left wants to make murder legal, drug abuse a lifestyle choice, and pedophilia a sexually protected right.
But who blows on all these troubles worldwide and is the root cause of so much misery? Well, the World Economic Forum and their friends in finance are the most modern menaces. They cause all the trouble that requires a big government to fix it, so no matter what you’ve been calling yourself over the years, a conservative or a liberal, the political definitions were created by the enemies of America to achieve their ultimate goal, which is to spend us into oblivion so that we’d be easy to conquer by putting us in debt to those global forces and putting a lot of foreign money into our efforts to protect our global turf. In doing all that, they gain control of our country and our present condition. And no issue is more important in the 2024 election than who controls what. Do Americans control their destiny, or have we so attached ourselves to globalism and, ultimately, the constructs of the World Economic Forum that we have no national sovereignty? We are at a point in politics where we must redefine all these previous assumptions and recognize the game for what it has been all along and to do that, we must go back to reconstruction after the Civil War. Everything that happened after has had this globalist problem attached to it, and therefore, our foreign policy assumptions about what that meant. But our definitions given to us were not our own; the globalists themselves created them for the goals of globalists, and any policy about foreign affairs that we are to have as a country must be directed at the World Economic Forum and its tampering of trouble around the world that always point directly at their door. If you want to go to war, go to war with them. Not their puppets. And then, and only then, we’ll see who the neocons are, and who the liberals are, because the definitions of both will have to be adjusted to reflect reality truly.
I’m happy to provide the ultimate reason that the 14th Amendment cannot be used against President Trump to keep him off the ballot for the 2024 election. There has been a lot of legal opinion on this new strategy from the Marxist left because they’ve seen the internals and know that Trump is winning much more than what is being reported in the media. That’s why they are panicking. There was no alternative plan when the actual insurrection occurred in 2020, and Trump was removed from the White House by a government-sponsored coup. And which one you might ask? Pick one of the many, from the FBI actions of insurrection to the many provable occurrences of outright election fraud. To the Russiagate manipulations. There was plenty of very illegal activity that has yet to be prosecuted. But they all are violations of the 14th Amendment that the political left and some RINOs from the right are trying to pin on Trump now to keep him from being able to run in 2024. The real issue is that Trump was the established government at the time, so how could he have an insurrection against himself? All Trump did was question the actions of an official insurrection that the opposing political party was coordinating. And those types of coups were happening in other parts of the world where communism and socialism were trying to seize power. So, out of desperation in America, and with the help of a complicit media that wanted Marxism in America, they tried the same thing. Only it didn’t work quite the same way. And this ultimately will result from all the cases established against Trump and his direct reports in the White House, such as Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon. The assumption of all the charges filed as they have been assumes that Trump was the insurgent when it was the other way around.
The desperation for turning to the 14th Amendment is quite telling, actually, and shows just how flimsy even the most astute legal minds have had to dig into attempting to give the Marxist radicals who want to continue to use the power of government for their global strategic plans, any leg to stand on. My essential formula for solving most modern problems is straightforward: Guns, The Bible, The Constitution, and Trump. Those four things will make America Great Again, again if used as intended. And the desperation of using the Constitution to keep Trump from running in 2024 is ironic. The people who are trying to overthrow all power in America are turning toward the rule of law as their weapon. But that’s not what it says in the 14th Amendment Section 3. The references to a political officeholder inspiring an insurrection have no place with Trump, as Trump was the government. He was the one with his hands on the reigns of power. The grand illusion being used against all Trump defendants is their attempt to ignore that Trump was ever in office and had government power under his complete control. From January 2017 to January 2021, Trump was the third branch of government, the Executive Branch, popularly elected by the people of America, despite the many rigged elections that were clearly established to prevent him or anybody else from beating Hillary Clinton. The actual insurrection was that the government forces who lost power when Trump was elected staged a coup which ultimately, with direct involvement from the intelligence community, tried to prevent the people’s will from being known. They underestimated that enthusiasm the first time, in 2016. And in 2020, they wouldn’t.
Under the cover of COVID-19, they changed the election laws that would allow them to cheat massively, and many tens of thousands of people were involved, knowingly. And they openly plotted and schemed against the established government the entire time that Trump was in office. They didn’t just say, “auh shucks, we’ll try next time.” No, they worked to commit actual insurrection against Trump’s government to remove him from power the way we have seen occur worldwide with various communist takeovers, precisely the same way. And with all of them, the assumption was that they would not recognize the Trump presidency as valid, nor any trace of executive privilege, because to do that, the Trump administration would have to be identified as the official government at the time. And to pretend that it never happened. That is the essential legal premise of all these cases against Trump. And it can’t be that way because once you compromise for one point, all cases fall apart. Which the communist insurgents who want to take over the American government might think is appealing until the same gets applied to them. This is why the Constitution is such a powerful document. What they say it says is not what it says. They only hope that people are too stupid to read it for themselves, but to hold up in court, the case falls apart fast, which is good because it shows how weak all their attempts against Trump are going into 2024. This is all they have everyone, a year away from the election, which isn’t good for them. What is concerning is that so many people are letting them attempt such a thing, which means the hair in the drain of the swamp that Trump represents draining is much thicker and involves many more Republican RINOs than many of us are comfortable admitting.
For all those legal people out there, you’re welcome. I’m always happy to help. The case’s merit is not whether Trump inspired an insurrection with his words to the public after the opposing government showed signs of a rigged election. It was clear to many what happened, especially during that year with Covid driving the behavior and the still very uncomfortable evidence about the purposeful release of the virus as a bioweapon to commit election fraud and give more global power to the efforts of the Great Reset at the World Economic Forum, hiding behind the façade of the United Nations. We were dealing with a worldwide insurrection, and Trump was in the way. But regarding the official government of the United States, Trump was that figure when an “insurrection” occurred. So, he couldn’t have had an insurrection against himself. It came from those who opposed him, who are now the same people trying to prevent the people’s voices from being heard in another election. They knew how to seize power in 2020 because the numbers were not with them. And without COVID to hide behind this time, they are trying to take Trump away as an option to even vote for because that’s how desperate they are. Their entire strategy is to ignore that Trump was ever the representative of the government and hope that they can perverse the wording of the 14th Amendment if only they threaten to firebomb the homes of Supreme Court members and intimidate them into seeing the law from the perspective of radical Marxists. That is their entire game plan. And it’s as flimsy as it sounds, even though media members don’t have enough confidence in their reading ability to understand the Constitution themselves. There is nothing to the 14th Amendment case against Trump, and ironically, it opens up the Trump people to be able to pursue the insurgents who were the real problem. Their legal counsel would serve them better if they started to look at things from that perspective instead of reacting off the back of their heels. These are easy cases that are only puffed-up bluster from the actual government insurgents, who have seized power and now have the White House and are desperate to do anything to keep that power, which is what this entire case is all about.
I liked Russ Loges the first time he ran for the Lakota school board. I came to know of him during the last election as my focus was on the Republican-endorsed candidates in the previous election. Russ wanted to remain independent as he was getting involved in the school board business then. However, without any name recognition and much support outside of his efforts, he had an excellent showing, gaining several thousand votes with a noticeably conservative position. I have since met Russ at a few events here and there, and each time, I found that I liked him quite a lot. He’s a very likable person who has an excellent temperament. And now that we are in September with the November election coming up quickly, one that will have a lot of Democrats voting because abortion and marijuana will be on the ballot, so there will be unusually high voter engagement during an off-year election, it’s time to get endorsements. And Russ has already received an approval from some Central Committees around Butler County. One of the two that are specific to Lakota schools. So, he came to a meet the candidate night with the Liberty Township Central Committee to present himself with some questions and answers, which are shown here for those interested. I’ve been to quite a lot of these over the years, and this one was unique. I liked Russ Loges before the event, but after, I found my opinion of him had inflated quite a lot. He answered many tough questions very well and cared a lot about what’s going on in Lakota and the specific challenges that are on the horizon. Russ Loges is precisely the kind of person that the community would benefit from putting on the school board during the upcoming election, and he will win the support of many more Republicans for a party endorsement due to his excellent conservative positions.
Yet what Russ Loges is not is a person trapped in ideology. He’s a very even, measured person getting into the school board business from parental concerns. We have seen over the years that, typically, the best school board candidates who become board members are passionate parents who want to make things better for everyone. It’s a generally thankless job that doesn’t pay back any real fiscal compensation, but to play in that game, you must raise a substantial amount of money to become impactful in an election, especially in the Lakota school district, which has around 100,000 people within it. When Russ ran before, he did it as a concerned parent who wanted to help. This time, he has a broader approach that makes him well-positioned for much more support. And given the crowd reaction at the Liberty Township Central Committee event, many more will become very eager to support his run for the Lakota school board. Based on his answers, Russ is more than prepared for some of the complex challenges that are coming quickly on the horizon, and to deal with those challenges, Lakota will need people who care which was clearly expressed during the questions asked by Matt King during the event. Russ has kids in the district and a wife who is a teacher. Currently, he is a nurse and his bedside manner is instantly noticeable. He’s personable, cares, and wants to help his community, so all those traits were very encouraging and made it easy for everyone who met him to get excited about it.
On those times that I had met him, I wasn’t sure if he was the real deal. So often, when it comes to political events and the people filling specific seats, you get images of people but not much knowledge of the person. When I learned Russ Loges was a nurse, I instantly thought of a smart car driving, COVID mask-wearing big government type. But I was able to meet Russ outside this event, getting out of a big truck, and he’s a good fit for the conservative base of Butler County, Ohio. He’s outdoors-oriented and robustly presents himself. He reminded me of many of my friends in the fast draw community, even down to the jokes. Good, sincere people who love the American flag and the many who revere it with the pledge of allegiance. He’s certainly not a political radical but more of an even-balanced family man who is proud of his country and wants to help it improve. He’s a big guy with a warm personality who comes across as sincere without many pretenses. As he shook my hand, he seemed ready to go fishing, or hunting more than anything. He has a very natural leadership ability that is instantly noticeable. So, it wasn’t a surprise to learn that he has already sat down with the Lakota superintendent to talk about improving test scores for the students and building a successful team that can tackle some of the challenges looming. You could tell that he wasn’t just a nurse as an occupation, but that he was a leader as well. He is used to managing other people because he has a balanced approach to communication that has been well-tested by experience.
There are a lot of challenges on the horizon for Lakota and it will take outstanding leadership to meet them. There is a teacher’s contract coming up that could be very contentious. There is a facilities plan also emerging that will require a small fortune. There are indications that the current school board is planning to seek a tax increase even as property value rate assessments will increase sharply due to state challenges. So passing a levy will be even more challenging, especially in an environment where school choice will increasingly become the reality of tomorrow, regarding education. It would be easy to sit on the sidelines and turn away from some of these community problems, especially for those who have grown kids. But Russ and his wife plan to be in Lakota for a while. He mentioned that he wanted Lakota to be good for his grandkids, so he’s planning to keep deep roots in the community, so this isn’t a fly-by-night endeavor for him. He wants to help, and after meeting him, I am sure he is just the kind of person we need to work on some of these very difficult problems that are on the horizon, storm clouds coming in fast that will be painful. Yet, those problems are manageable with the right kind of people to deal with them, and Russ Loges was very encouraging. He could have easily won if more people had known him during the last race. More people will know him this time so he should be able to get votes in the required numbers just by letting people get to know him. I will certainly be voting for him, and I’ll be excited to do it. Things don’t always go how you want them to in politics, but sometimes you get to meet good people, and if not for this school board race, I wouldn’t know Russ Loges any other way. And after meeting him, I’m happy I did.
Something significant is happening that is very obvious, but little has been made of it; people are generally waking up to the malicious intentions of Bill Gates and his friends in the World Economic Forum. People are now looking for the sideshow games where crimes against humanity have been committed, and Klaus Schwab and the economic Marxist terrorists of the world are not prepared for the wrath that is coming their way, which was most evident in the wake of the Maui wildfires. Well, at this point, we should call it the Maui arson that destroyed a town that had been discussed as a satellite city for the World Economic Forum’s 15-minute cities. The best way to build one is to destroy the old one, which looks to be the case here. A few years ago, nobody would have asked any questions. Conspiracy theorists would have voiced their opinions, but the mainstream media would have poured cold water on them, and the public would have accepted the controlled narrative. But not any longer, not since Covid ruined the trust of public officials, and now three years of Biden have shocked people into observing the obvious. The World Economic Forum has gone too far, and the shock to the world has been a degraded impression. I noticed something similar when Microsoft, run by Bill Gates, released Windows 95, which was not as well received as Windows 3.1. And ever since, Microsoft has been further scrutinized to the point it is today. A necessary evil that people generally don’t trust. Just as they no longer trust Bill Gates. That is the case with everyone connected to the World Economic Forum. People are onto the games and now see them being played everywhere, not conspiratorial, but in the logical way the bad guys have always tried to hide from the public.
I said that the truth about the Maui fires would emerge in the aftermath as we watched what people did. As it turns out, the power company had been trying to maintain its infrastructure, but the emphasis was on woke policies for renewables, straight from the World Economic Forum’s radical agenda. And the power company had turned off the power hours before the fire started, so how could a spark from them set off the blaze? There are a lot of unanswered questions that only point to terrorist activity, not a natural occurrence or an accident from the power company due to infrastructure failure. I have seen that same radicalism in my state of Ohio regarding FirstEnergy. On the one hand, they have adopted all these woke rules to appease the climate terrorists, making them the target of a hostile public upset at the changes. But then the climate terrorists are trying to set up the power companies for complete failure and are looking to drive them out of business. It’s the classic gun-to-the-head robber who forces someone they are holding up to do what they are told, only to be shot dead after they’ve handed over all their money. These climate terrorists doing their deeds for the World Economic Forum behind the efforts of the United Nations are playing for keeps, which looks to be the kind of set-up job in Maui. But the public is aware of the game, and they instantly rejected the official narratives for the fire and went straight for the developers who have promised to rebuild as a “city of tomorrow” as the instigators of so much death and destruction. If it can happen in Maui, then it could happen everywhere.
The bad guys in the world have been doing these things for a long time, destroying the planet and rebuilding it in their version of “Build Back Better.” That kind of terminology was already being stamped on liberal t-shirts before there was a Joe Biden in the White House, but after Covid was a major overstep by Bill Gates and the gang, they didn’t seem to realize that it was a step too far. And now people have lost trust in the officials that the World Economic Forum has worked so hard to capture. But now that they have the power, they have lost the public’s faith and don’t seem to understand why. Their entire plan, just like every version of Windows ever released that was supposed to be better than the first, has consistently failed in some way because they could never quite get it right. Power is hard; it’s easy to make a misstep, and that is what we are dealing with now. Climate terrorists were just caught starting fires in Greece to attempt to evoke an environmental message, and now that fires are breaking out all over the world frequently, it’s not a natural occurrence that people expect. The first thought is climate terrorism by these radical Marxists inspired by the members of the World Economic Forum who plan to profit off the carnage and then build what they want. There’s one sure way to overcome the kind of city opposition that building a 15-minute city would typically involve. Just burn it down and kill all the people who would oppose it. Then blame the power company you are also trying to put out of business because they use fossil fuels in capitalist markets. That game has been going on for too long, and many people have suffered.
The public outrage is very energetic on social media. How much of it gets outside the algorithms tightly controlled by the Deep State is an issue for debate. Typically, discussions against the administrators of the Deep State and the members of the World Economic Forum who have a lot of money that they think buys their governments don’t get outside of the circular firing squad of specific groups that are easily monitored by the powerful forces who think they are in charge. But the word is getting out anyway, and ordinary people now see the obvious. They are asking the right questions that are no longer conspiracies but honest observations that have lingered in the background. People might have been shy about expressing those opinions, but now they are open. And regarding the Maui fires, there is actual hostility that is well-founded. People don’t like to be suckered, and they feel suckered. Bill Gates has shown the same kind of stupidity with his climate change activism that he did with Windows releases. Everything worked for him as long as he had a monopoly on opinion. But once people could think for themselves, which started happening with Windows 95, the value of their Microsoft products began to diminish. People would put up with it to get along, but they weren’t suddenly yearning for the product. And that same thing has happened to the losers in the World Economic Forum. They thought people would want what they were selling: globalism, climate change, a godless, overly sexualized heathen society of sweaty losers looking to them as gods. But, what they have been caught doing was acting as the latest terrorists, no different from the old hippie Weather Underground radicals. Instead of operating out of the back of a pot-filled, rusting van playing Beatles eight-track tapes, they are billionaires like Bill Gates who have lost their minds, if they ever really had them.
I love the new busing strike at Lakota schools. Nothing infuriates me more than slow-moving vehicles clogging up the roadways, and since school has started back for the fall, all the buses hauling kids around to a communist government school in my district that eats money insatiably has been a sore subject for me. I’ve dealt with this busing issue for years; I remember when Lakota cut busing as an extortion method to push parents to pass a tax increase back when we had to fight those levies every few months. And I certainly remember how it was during Covid. Parents learned not to have busing, and as far as I’m concerned, parents can take their kids to school. They’ve done it before; they can do it again. They already get a free babysitting service in the school paid for by the taxpayers, so the least they can do is drive their kids to school. But my favorite school board member, the only one who has been really good on busing issues to make things better for parents, Darbi Boddy, is supportive of busing services and has wanted to expand coverage. See, we don’t agree on everything, just most things. Darbi ultimately is not a professional politician, but she’s in politics the way it’s supposed to be. She’s a mom, and she thinks like a parent. So, she is undoubtedly sympathetic toward school bus drivers as they voted to strike just before Labor Day 2023. And what’s unusual about this strike isn’t about money or benefits. The busing services are contracted out to a company called Petermann, which handles the needs of the drivers, who are well compensated. Instead, the problem is over surveillance, a similar tech issue as is at the core of the Hollywood strike of actors and writers. Technology has turned into a tyrant, and the drivers aren’t happy about it, so they have walked off the job.
Of course, there is more to the story, which is why this is a compelling analysis. Lakota schools want to micromanage the bus drivers in ways they would never dare do with their employees, and because of Petermann handling the union responsibilities, it has given Lakota schools a chance to try and fix their social perception problem with parents during an election year, without having to take responsibility for anything and making members of their radical leftist union upset. Lakota has been very soft on pedophilia over the last several years, following some genuinely detrimental behavior with several past employees that have damaged the public school brand. Followed by some very disappointing report cards from the state and a financial situation where the lawyers are essentially running the school, the current school board, except for Darbi Boddy, has been a complete disaster. So they need a public relations push, and this school bus driver issue has been, for them, a golden opportunity. Suddenly, they want to use technology to monitor if the bus drivers are putting both hands on the steering wheel while turning and if they are staying within the speed limit. The same policy is not present to ensure that Lakota teachers behave themselves. If a kid shoots a spitball at the back of a bus driver’s head, and the driver yells at the kid. The act will be caught on video. But if it happens in a classroom, nobody will ever know. So based on that premise, Lakota management, starting at the school board, is talking out of both sides of its mouth, which is a standard from them, not an exception.
Without question, there are school bus drivers who are cheating slugs. They don’t fill their logbooks out correctly; monitoring will help correct that problem. But the number is likely under 25%. There is no precise justification for abusing the other 75% with overmanagement while the rest of the school culture gets away with horrendous acts of defilement and social degradation. Sure, bus drivers park in places they shouldn’t be to associate with other drivers who shouldn’t be there between pickup tasks. There are many reasons to justify the increased monitoring of the bus-driving staff. But the question is, “Should they do it?” Given the government school culture, the least of the problems are the bus drivers, yet the school board and superintendent want to be harsh with them in just another phony plea to convince parents that management cares about the kids. Parents interact with school bus drivers as representatives of the school more than they do the school itself, as the bus usually comes to their homes personally, where the school is someplace the kids disappear to. This has allowed the school board to appear tough on discipline over employees they don’t even have responsibility for while Lakota’s teacher’s union members get away with everything. If Lakota wanted to be tough on employees, it would have reacted much differently to the many abuses of kids that get reported but are slowly dealt with at the school board to protect the school’s image rather than to make kids a priority. But if a school bus driver goes over the speed limit by driving 40 MPH on a road that’s only 35, even though the rest of the traffic is going 45 MPH, then the push will be to write that driver up for a safety violation. Technology has allowed for this kind of oppressive micromanagement, which is not good.
It’s hard enough to get drivers for a school bus; it’s a part-time job at best that you have to spend your whole day doing, first early in the morning, to pick the kids up. Then, mid-day pre-rush hour traffic takes them home. It’s an idea I don’t think society should have ever started. It should be the responsibility of the parents to take their kids to get an education, wherever it is. Bussing has made it way too easy for parents. In this case, it has been an all too easy target for a school board that has mismanaged its affairs to appear more diligent than they are because the introduction of expanded technology has allowed tyrants to have power over others they should never have. Mainly when the utilization is not applied evenly to all parties involved. The bus drivers are being punished for disciplines that the school board would never apply to the teachers and administrators under their management. The third-party Petermann drivers are an easy target with expendable employees. And if nobody goes to school, the teachers get a more leisurely day, which we saw they were too willing to exploit during COVID-19. Technology isn’t used to improve everything, only to control it for power over innocent people while the real trouble persists elsewhere. The hope is that parents will think Lakota is doing an excellent job with the safety of their children by monitoring speed limits and hand placement during driving while the teachers are trying to convince boys that they are girls and that everyone can use whatever bathroom they want. Meanwhile, the lawyers are using taxpayer money to settle every legal challenge that comes their way, and they are trying to do to Darbi Boddy what the school board is trying to do to the bus drivers: blame them for all the lousy mismanagement of the district, when the real trouble is in their back yard, which many parents will never otherwise see.
It’s an exciting trend, not a surprising one, but certainly telling, and that is debates no longer matter in presidential politics, and as a byproduct of that, money is much less of a factor. One thing that was grossly obvious in the last Fox News debate was how much things have changed in just a very short period, and if you watched it, or at least some of it as I did, you can see a desperation from the cable news networks to assert a power that they used to have over the process, which they are desperate to hang on to. Among those under 10% types, there was a consistency to bend allegiance to the media moguls who wanted to set the presidential agenda around consultants and Beltway priorities to keep a globalist narrative on track. And Trump wisely stepped beyond those controls, leaving essentially the old-world Republicans to battle it out for the bottom in an utterly meaningless debate. While the discussion was occurring, Trump, of course, did his now famous Tucker Carlson interview, which very quickly gathered up a quarter of a billion views, so the differences in future state politics and the past that have been primarily controlled by consulting firms and media tycoons couldn’t be more obvious. It’s all about the horse race and the coverage leading up to it for all the parasites who have injected themselves into the process and, over time, taken complete control of the narrative. But that’s changing now, as it should have long ago. All presidential politics should be about managing the republic and nothing else. However, just like in sports, we have turned a game into it, and many people have figured out how to make a living off the coverage of that game. Some have even toyed with the idea that they can run the country if only they force the candidates to stay within the debate framework established by the media.
One of the big arguments that were made toward Trump joining the Fox News debate was that if the President started a trend of not participating in discussions, then Joe Biden would likely skip doing any arguments in 2024. Well, I have news for everyone: Joe Biden will never do any more debates. His handlers will not put him on a stage to talk outside a controlled format. It’s just not going to happen. There will be no presidential debates in 2024, which, of course, all the people who make their living covering the horse race of politics find devastating. But that’s a good thing because all those tag-alongs were useless anyway. The debates in elections were meant to show people who the candidates were. But they have evolved into setting the presidential agenda. Everyone knows who Trump is; he’s the most famous person on Earth. Nobody is going to learn anything new about Trump after a debate. The only people who would benefit would be the people hosting the discussion and trying to sell airtime while covering the horse race of politics. That is essentially all Fox News is and has been for a long time. They cover the horse race but don’t care much for what horse wins. They make their money off the event’s coverage, not the actual results in the aftermath. This kind of culture has led to all the wrong priorities, leading blank-minded candidates to dance to the strings of media owners who then take the business of the republic and form fit it into their business needs.
During his last term, Trump showed how easy it is to fix many of these issues that consultants have been getting in the way of for a long time, which has hidden itself behind the debate culture of the past. That’s another reason the media hates Trump; he has exposed this game. He doesn’t need the money that donors can give, and he doesn’t need the media to make him into a star. He’s his own person, which infuriates the consultant class. They can’t make him who he is; he doesn’t need them, which is one of the scariest realities they could have for a lot of people who are parasites in the world–not to be needed, and Trump doesn’t. It also points out the political change where money is used to buy influence. Money doesn’t have so much power these days because the game used to be that the media would make a star out of a candidate, and that star would then use that success to raise money, so the money could then be used to buy airtime on the media that created the star, to begin with. Trump has stepped over that entire process altogether. It’s all been a shell game that has benefited the wrong people. The voters have been used to generate the money, but they never get what they want out of politics, leaving everyone perpetually hungry for the next horse race, which Fox News starts covering three years before an election. It’s been a big scam that does nothing to help solve problems; it only makes money for those who cause all the trouble in the first place, and people are no longer interested. That may be terrifying to the people who make money off politics, but it’s a changing business, and they’ll have to adapt.
The Biden people ripped off the scab when they tried to put him in office with a campaign in his basement during Covid. Trump and Biden had a debate that year, 2020, but they fell short of completing the traditional three that had preceded their terms. Biden is a primarily handled media caricature kept in power by stolen elections, just as most communist countries stay in control. Only in America people know better because we do have a free media culture. And if traditional media doesn’t serve the people, then they will find alternatives, and they have. And Trump’s campaign in 2024 will completely embrace that new media. The old media isn’t doing anything useful anyway, so Trump doesn’t need them. Biden has shown that he doesn’t need them either. So, there won’t be any presidential debates in 2024. Fox News hosting these debates is over; nobody cares. And there will be no return to that type of shell game, rightfully, because money has essentially been taken out of politics. Money can’t buy support the way it has been sold in the past. People form opinions about political candidates much differently now, and consultants are finding themselves out of a job they never should have had in the first place. The future of Trump is to move much faster than the Beltway consultants ever could, and the news will occur at a speed only fast-moving social media can cover. Newsrooms with editors picking the top three stories of the day are a thing of the past. The need to know, and quickly, is the wave of tomorrow, and people will form their opinions on their own, not to be shaped by the glitz of media machines and slick ad campaigns. No, for a change, candidates will be judged by what they do, not what they say, and the future of politics is all about achievement, not manipulation, which is a needed change that we’ve needed for a long time.
Everyone is always looking for the next great business tip for a competitive advantage, so here it is. You can tell because of trends like what is going on with the Washington Redskins NFL team and the Cleveland Indians. The fans of those teams are getting petitions signed to restore their names to what they were pre-woke. The momentum of wokeness has shifted, and we see the political pendulum swinging the other way. The Marxists had their chance, which didn’t have a positive impact that society could see for themselves. The Beatles song “Imagine” didn’t come out very well when the World Economic Forum was starting mass viruses for their Great Reset and turning the responsibility of enforcement over to your local human resource office to do through businesses what nobody would ever be able to do through government regulation. The Marxists of the world figured out that by design, our political systems in America were established to go slow to keep the government from interrupting the machine of capitalism. So, they turned their attention to businesses to attack them there, and what we have seen happening in business climates over the last several decades has been Marxism, and people didn’t notice until recently. Because most people have an adversarial relationship with their employers, it wasn’t something people saw coming in the front door. But now that it’s here, they want it gone. And that is the future state of business. I’ve seen this communist, Marxist approach in the industry for a long time, growing year by year, and finally, after Trump was removed from office after a government-organized coup, no different from the many communist revolutions around the world, people finally have had enough of it, and that trend began to go the other way after the last Covid vaccine mandates.
Just as professional sports teams were tricked into changing their names into woke acceptance, this is not what society wants. They want cool names for their sports teams, not the Guardians, but the Indians in Cleveland. I was just in Cleveland, and that name change a few years into it is still a joke, and it’s not getting better. I have had some interactions with members of the family of that team, and their woke acceptance has not gone over well. People are turning on them for allowing woke politics into their sacred sports franchise. And that is certainly the case with the Washington Football team in D.C. People want their Redskins back. This anti-capitalist approach to life is not what people want in the world. They have been patient with corporations that became politically active toward Marxism, some of America’s largest corporations. When we talk about globalism, we are essentially talking about Marxism because that is how it is everywhere else. Americans have taken the advantages of capitalism for granted because they didn’t know any better. And they assumed that the companies they worked for had at least primary American values. But that’s not how most corporations are these days; they have drifted into this Marxist compliance because if they had manufacturing plants in China, Vietnam, or Europe, they were dealing with some level of Marxism, whether it was outright communism or socialism. It was not free market capitalism that was the driver of their economies. It was the slow-moving and lazy administrative state, and it was slowing things down to levels that have been unacceptable in America. I’m old enough to know what it was like before, and I have watched over several decades of being on the front line how Marxism has migrated into the human resource departments to influence how people live their everyday lives. But the final straw happened during Covid and the slow realization that most people have from President Trump being in the White House, then Joe Biden. Bidenomics has not been good for anybody but the global Marxists.
I have often pointed out, over a long period, how the Lean Manufacturing trend was filled with cultural Marxism. Many of the central foundations of business ethics these days attack the notion of the golf-playing CEO with a nice car, a trophy wife, and is oozing with success. In Lean Manufacturing, they want the members of management to come from their offices out to where the work is done, not just to become more effective in understanding a problem. That is how it sold to them. But it’s really to minimize management in the eyes of the employees, to establish a level of sameness among everyone that displays nobody is in charge but the centralized employees. Not even the marketplace. Compliance with regulators as they get their talking points from the World Economic Forum has been their weapon of choice and has been a slow burn. The CEOs and CFOs who have survived the most were those bootlicker types who appeased the bureaucratic regulators and were not focused on giving the public what they wanted—but imposing on the public Marxist restrictions not just in the employer but in the marketplace itself. Rather than march people into Washington D.C. at gunpoint as Castro did in Cuba and kill political rivals off point blank, the Marxists took a much more passive-aggressive route. They regulated capitalists out of existence. But the marketplace is catching on and is pushing back. Because of Trump’s successful administration, people tasted the good life again and want it back. So, the political sentiment is swinging the other way.
The World Economic Forum is failing; many of their 2030 plans, as scary as they are for their intent, are falling apart, much the way the name changes in sports are getting so much public pushback. I do get to talk to people worldwide for perspective, and the sentiment is pretty much everywhere the same. They are upset with Marxism and don’t want it in their products or the companies that make them. And they certainly don’t want it in their sports teams. People were willing to put up with it as long as they had the illusion of capitalism functioning in the background. But now that they know differently, they want their capitalism back, so the future of business will go to those companies who most embrace capitalism for the majority of market share in the future. Further woke trends from the human resource departments, such as paperless paychecks into bank accounts that centralized bankers can completely control, are not tomorrow’s trend. But quite the opposite. Ownership was diminished by the Marxists, including how pay was distributed or whether or not your employer could force you to get a vaccine of poison to keep your job. The Marxists got caught talking out of both sides of their mouth; while they were saying work from home, fair pay for fair work, and make sure you get an excellent ESG score, the radical leftist Larry Fink and the Wall Street insurgents were saying, if you value your job, you’ll get the government medicine from the world’s largest drug dealer, the federal government. People were willing to listen before and in the years leading up to these ridiculous sentiments of globalism on American corporations. But now they aren’t, and success will be measured differently. The less compliant with Marxist measures globally, the better companies will be. And that is tomorrow’s trend for those who want to get a jump start. Capitalism works not just because it makes money for those who utilize it. But also, it’s a measure of morality that the public can influence, which was always at the heart of all economic activity and always will be.
It will continue to be one of the universe’s great mysteries why people can look at sports teams and have opinions about what they should be doing, but they can’t apply those same methods to their lives. This is a prominent issue every year in pre-season football with the mini camps as teams figure out which players they will cut and which will make their final roster. Good teams figure out the right players and get them all pointed in the right direction for the success or failure of a season. If the players are allowed to pick their fellow players, teams tend not to do so well. It takes good leadership to figure it out and put people together who likely wouldn’t figure it out for themselves. Good teams tend to have players playing together who wouldn’t otherwise be friends. One of the mysterious qualities of leadership is to see things of value beyond the choice of friendships, and when it comes to sports, most people get it. They understand what makes success and have many opinions about it. But they can’t do it when it comes time to utilize those same skills in their lives. That is certainly the situation in business. And it is undoubtedly the case in politics. The goal of all these endeavors is to figure out what success looks like, whether it be winning a Super Bowl, having a great business quarter, or providing a great political party to the voting public; once success is understood, then leadership needs to do what it must to give that result. It’s not complicated. Yet, it remains one of the least utilized factors in human interaction.
There is only one correct measure to winning in politics; it is in a political party providing the voting public with good people they can vote for. Any other action is missing the point. If a political party is not focused on those attributes, then they aren’t trying to be a good political party. I would say this is a problem all over America, in every aspect of county politics, no matter where we talk about it. And that is certainly the case with the Butler County Republican Party in Ohio, where I live. I can say that I know many people at that party, and I personally liked them all in some way or another. If you sit down and talk to people, I can usually find something I like about just about anybody. But the problem is, do they make an excellent political party just because you want them? And in most cases, that is not the reality. Politics should only aim to provide voters and taxpayers with good people to represent them best. When political parties lose sight of that strategy, things go wrong. And that is how RINOs in the Republican Party come to be. Most people get into politics for ideological reasons. However, the concessions they make to get along with other people become detrimental to their representation of the voter base, which is the value of the party brand. If people have good representation in politics, then the brand of the party could be said to be good. If voters don’t, they start to lose faith in the system, voter engagement lowers, and the direction of victory in politics changes dramatically. When voters feel that the people they elect don’t represent them, we could say that politics has failed.
It’s just like the comparison with the sports team that desires to put a winning team on the field so people come to the games and feel good about the chances for a victory, so they buy beer and overpriced hot dogs at the concessions, which is really how the team makes their money, how they measure their value to the customer base. If the team isn’t winning, there are fewer fans to buy hot dogs, to put it simply. The same holds in politics. I know many people who want to run for office within the Butler County Republican Party. But, they do not feel they can remain people of integrity because of the restrictions of party politics. So, we end up with the wrong people running for office while much better candidates that the public would love to have representing them are sitting on the sidelines. This is a case where the players on the field pick people they like and are comfortable with, not the leadership of the voting public deciding how that team would shape out. Too often, and this year of 2023 is undoubtedly a good example, many good people are not participating in the political process because they have learned that they aren’t in the cool kids club and will never be invited. Because the party is picking the members, not the voters. And instead of letting the voters shape the party, the players are forming the team; then they wonder why many fans are not supporting their losing effort.
Not everyone gets into politics for the same reasons. I understand that some feel that getting into politics protects their business interests from a corrosive government and provides a barrier to their efforts to keep their businesses healthy. These are not ideological people but practical ones who see government as dangerous to their interests in business, so they get involved in politics to protect their efforts. And those people are trying to play nice in the sandbox with ideologically based people who enter politics for reasons of genuine philosophy. And those kinds of people are scary to those looking for political stability. I get it. Just like a wide receiver on a football team being upset that a new tight end is playing the slot receiver role, the wide receiver might feel like the coaching staff is trampling on their turf. But so what? Maybe that is the best way to become a winning team. That doesn’t mean that the tight end should be run off the team to make the wide receiver feel like they have job security and aren’t threatened by challengers. Challenges make the team better. But then better for whom? For the players or the fans? That is what must be decided, and what I have seen from the GOP in general, especially since Trump has been out of office, is a party for the players, not for the voters. It’s the players making the teams they want to play with. They are not trying to give the voting public the best representatives they can get. And if a political party isn’t doing that, they aren’t trying to be the best they can be for their communities. While such a concept may not be complicated, it remains the biggest stumbling block to any successful venture within human endeavor. And that is certainly the case in politics. Some great people want to participate, but they have been told in so many words or less that politics is about maintaining friendships and that everyone needs to stay in their lane and behave. But that is not what voters want, and until political parties listen, the public will continue to be let down by the result.
The Overmanwarrior 