Tag: Men

What Women Hate The Most: Nobody wants to see a slug too lazy to work

There is a recent survey where women have indicated that the periods where they experience the most stress are when their men, the people they pick to share a life with, raise a family, and build something, are lying on the couch doing nothing but watching TV or playing video games.  Now I say all this after years of experience in employing people, many thousands of them, and after raising two daughters and being married for 38 years to the same woman.  What I’m going to say is politically incorrect in lots of ways, but it’s the result of terrible things that we have taught our society when we tried to implement feminism into a biological experiment that has essentially destroyed people at a very foundational level.  We have a laziness problem, and it came from people who wanted to socially re-engineer society by attacking men and toxic masculinity, to empower women to play a larger role in the workplace, and in spending less time raising families, because the idea of a family was under attack by radical leftist ideas.  So most of what men have come to believe about what they should be doing in the world has come from people trying to destroy them, purposefully by rotting their minds with social fashions that were never healthy for them or society.  But that doesn’t change the biology of people, where women expect a man to be strong and to take care of them so they can raise a nice family.  No matter what society has said about the subject, when a woman sees a man lying on the couch not doing anything, it brings her great stress.  It doesn’t matter who the woman is; it just doesn’t sit well with them because it makes it evident to the woman that her man is useless. 

Oh, the man might be good at something here and there, but if he won’t work, it makes him pretty much a slug, a detriment to the creation of the family.  And women were told by that same society that they could replace all those emotions with a career of their own and their own paycheck.  And that the public schools would teach their children everything they needed to know, so they shouldn’t worry about any of it.  But for women, there is always something going on, a bill that needs to be paid, oil that needs to be changed, grass that needs to be cut.  The grim reality for a woman when she sees that her man wants to sleep on the couch all the time without doing the work it takes to build a family is that she is doomed to a life of misery.  Once a woman trades sexual favors to a man to launch a family, which all women experience, like trout returning to the spring of their birth, if a woman fails to get a guy in her life who will help her build a family, the disappointment starts to really eat away at her, and everything starts to fall apart.  She may raise her kids in a somewhat reasonable way, but what she is left with in the aftermath is major disappointment and resentment.  Kids don’t stay young very long.  What is a couple supposed to do together once they have come together and raised kids?  Especially if the men are lying around sleeping while there is a lot of work to be done?  Chances are their marriage will end, or the woman will grow very resentful and start hating the man for all the disappointments he brought her during that key time in her life.  If a family isn’t working together towards a common goal, everything falls apart. 

I’m not joking when I talk about AI being more reliable than people.  I love the idea of being productive with AI because, based on my experience, people are often unreliable.  They have too much emotional baggage from the numerous decisions they’ve made over the years, which have led to personal destruction.  As I have watched many people grow up and go through this cycle, I have always thought of it as an artificial problem created by social values that were all wrong.  A lot of men were taught that hard work led to heart attacks and an unhealthy life.  So they think that eating potato chips all day while earning new merits in a video game environment will satisfy them.  All it really does is entertain them until the next revision comes out and they have to start all over again.  The idea of buying a house, keeping the cars running, and caring for their children with strong emotional foundations is someone else’s problem, doesn’t excite them as it should.  Someone will eventually pick up the slack.  They have been taught that the excuse for their lack of work is to maintain stress so they don’t die from being overworked.  But in that process, their wives secretly hope they’ll die and free them of the misery and embarrassment that so many men these days bring to their marriages.  People have been taught that hard work is bad for them, and that not working at a job and spending their leisure time trying to do less work is somehow beneficial.  And it is at that source that all the problems start.  I’m thrilled that we’re at a time when AI can begin to do what many young men won’t do: work in a productive environment. 

I’ve always worked a lot, at least 60 to 80 hours a week.  And I fix all kinds of things, all the time.  Growing up, most of the people I knew were farmers, who always worked hard.  And when people worked hard, they were happier people.  And that is certainly true of me, I’m a happy person.  What makes me unhappy is witnessing laziness, people who work hard to avoid working hard.  My experience suggests that they are bringing misery upon themselves in a rebellion against logic.  And they aren’t even curious about the poison they have been given through their learning, from people obviously trying to sink America by destroying its workforce.  After World War II, America demonstrated its industrial capacity through the hard work of its free people. Many people around the world then sought to undermine the American work ethic for various malicious reasons.  And as we look around today, they have been all too successful.  Many men, young and old, are wasting their lives lying around doing nothing, then complaining when they are expected to pull their own weight.   And the women who match up with them are miserable, because they only get a few short years in their lives to get it right, when their flowers bloom, and they can pick whoever they want in the world through sexuality, to build a family with.  And if they get a dud, it brings misery to them for the rest of their life.  They might raise their families and make the best of things.  However, nothing makes them more stressed out than learning that their men don’t want to work while the bills pile up and the family’s needs are not being met.  And the young girls turn into bitter women as their windows close.  Sure, they could get a divorce, but for what purpose?  To find a harder-working man?  There aren’t many out there; chances are, the next one will be a dud too.  And as women raise their families and are stuck with an uninteresting slug sleeping on the couch every day and won’t keep the cars running, or the bills paid, women slowly die inside with the grim reality that it’s all over way too fast.  And if only hard work had been at the core of their marriage, life would have been a lot better for everyone.  Life is about hard work, and the more you put into it, the happier you will be.  The definition of a happy life never comes from leisure.  We are meant to work, and to work a lot.  The last thing a woman wants in her life is a slug that is like another child she has to feed and change all the time, who doesn’t help her have a happy life because he is too lazy to work.  The woman wants to work to raise her family, and if he is just another parasite in her life, taking from her instead of her having to give everything to the creation of a family, of course, she’s not going to be very happy when he’s sleeping on the couch.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

‘Conception Begins at Erection’: The rediculous communism of people like Represenative Anita Somani

To understand why the Ohio bill by Anita Somani is so stupid, “Conception Begins at Erection,” you have to understand that flower child Democrats who want the communist world of John Lennon’s “Imagine” are anti-family and have been working to dismantle it as the focus of their political platform from the beginning.  Their basic premise is that sex is their seductive tool to dismantle society and prevent good families from being created at any level.  So they need open, loose sex to perpetuate their intentions of social destruction, which is why they love abortion so much.  For a woman to be equal to a man and to have consequence-free sex, she must have access to abortions.  Nowhere in the Democrat platform does it question whether sex should be practiced at all without the institution of marriage being applied because sex itself is used as a tool of destruction, as introduced by the communists of Europe who migrated to America to bring down their rival generation by generation.  The communists of the hippie movement needed free love, free sex, and a lack of possession of a single-sex partner to usher in their concept of a no-possession world where nobody owned anything, especially each other.  And sex was their tool, a temptation that most human beings care a lot about and feel some urge to practice.  To achieve this hostile act, women needed to have the means to destroy the ramifications of a bad decision, whereas, in a healthy society, they would be gatekeepers of value.  If they didn’t want some scum bag, smelly dude crawling all over them jobless and with no future prospects, who was to judge.  Maybe he had tattoos, and some body piercings, and her dad wouldn’t like him, so in a flight of fancy, the young girl sleeps with the reckless despot.  Only to get pregnant and tied for the rest of her life to the mistake of a bad decision through pregnancy.  To promote further destructive social behavior, the communist left known as the Democrat Party in America needed abortion to implement their means of family destruction.

Anita Somani is one of those radical medical professionals along the lines of people like Ohio’s Amy Acton, the lunatic who shut down the State during Covid, and Dr. Fauci, who is so well known for his disastrous social policies that harmed and killed many millions of people through horrendous healthcare advice.  Too many of these healthcare professionals who have radical communist ideas have shown themselves to be destructive, and that is certainly the case for Representative Anita Somani.  She is an old hippie chick who calls female rights the right to use sex as a torpedo for bad behavior and to destroy family creation through the temptations of loose sexual practice.  Traditionally, a woman might turn away a man who didn’t have their act together for sexual interaction, and she might get pregnant as a result, a mistake that would last the rest of her life; with abortion, those mistakes were promoted.  A woman could set the reset button and try to forget that the error ever happened.  She just might be tempted to make more mistakes, which would further erode the desire to start a family, and instead would enter the workforce and compete with men for jobs and head of household status socially.  Always in the back of their plans, and in the focus of people like the Ohio Democrat Anita Somani, is the notion that all people belong to each other, that children, if produced, belong to the Democrat-controlled state, and that families should be destroyed in favor of a communist commune of social, pot smoking, despots. 

We’re now at a point where this merging of social roles has been vastly accepted, so most people think such talk sounds almost Amish in tradition.  Equality was the priority, and to make women equal to men, they had to be slugs and even reckless.  How else would women be used to be instruments of destruction when traditionally, a man would have to work hard to win the affection of a woman, especially a pretty one?  There is another problem that arises: in such a merit-based system, pretty women have an advantage over those not so attractive, and Democrats couldn’t have that.  That would mean attractive people would merge to have beautiful babies, further causing the problems of equality that Democrats were so obsessed with, making equality impossible until everyone was equally ugly.  So, to further drive home the point of irresponsible behavior, the man-hating culture of Democrats like Anita Somani wants to punish men for bad sexual decisions just because they engage in activity that results in discharging semen without the intent to produce a baby with it.  Ohio isn’t the only place where these kinds of satirical legislative proposals are being introduced.  This is a pro-abortion movement that Democrats think is cute as Trump and Republicans settle in to dismantle everything that progressives have built over the last century.  And Democrats believe this is the way they are going to win people back to their party instead of watching them bleed away and become Republicans.  Anita Somani is so tone-deaf from communist propaganda over the years, the hippie vantage point of sexual utilization to form a borderless world where nobody owns any private property, that she can’t see how dumb this proposal is under any consideration.  People are turning away from this kind of thinking and are very open to more traditional views on sexual relationships because what we have been doing has left a lot of people miserable and unfulfilled.   Several generations of this destructive behavior have alarmed society to the point where they want to make some changes.  They are moving away from people like Anita Somani, not toward them, as might have been the case during the 1970s to 2000s. 

I’ve bumped into Representatives like Anita Somani in Columbus more than I’d like to.  They are all over the place, and when you talk to them, they are as stupid as you’d think.  They have those empty eyes of social propaganda that look at you with a kind of blank stare because they only have one gear of thinking: social destruction disguised as rights and equality.  And they just can’t be reasoned with.  They are so out of touch with people that they think political stunts like this ridiculous bill will rally people to their cause of more man-hating family destruction to perpetuate their communist political platforms.  They don’t understand that the world has been turning away from them for a long time, especially now that Trump is back in office.  People want standards.  There is no higher form of government than the management of individual families.  First comes a family, then comes your community, then your state, then your country.  Only after all other things are taken care of can we worry about the world.  Not the other way around.  When you dig into the lives of people like Anita Somani, you find miserable people with lots of unhappy spouses and kids because they put their efforts into everything but their families and it shows in their homes and careers.  To cover those mistakes, they dig even deeper into communism to disguise their mistakes with social restructuring because if the rules of good conduct are changed, nobody will judge them as losers.  Which, of course, they are, and that is why their political movement is falling apart as it was always destined to do. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Nature of Snakes and Mice: What keeps the vipers from working against Trump during a second term

https://rumble.com/embed/v4uv5tf/?pub=3rih5

Many people are concerned that President Trump will keep getting suckered by all the snakes and vipers constantly sabotaging his first four years when he gets back in the White House.  Because they are still alive and well, we learned how many snakes there were just on the surface by draining the swamp just a bit.  If all the contents of the swamp were drained, many more vile creatures would be revealed just out of site, which is why things look so terrifying today.  It’s not new that we see all this criminal activity and deceitful practice.  But it is not as well hidden as it usually is and this is new.  What will be different in this next term from the first, and what will keep Trump from having many of the same vile characters leaking negative information to the press and trying to sabotage the MAGA agenda as they did the first time around?  Well, when thinking about these kinds of things, I tend to look to nature at how civilization is organized for the answer, and based on that, this second Trump term is poised to be something extraordinary.  And that is in understanding the behavior of mice and snakes during feeding time, and how they behave in captivity as opposed to the wild.  You can never change the nature of either, but you can manage their behavior toward a productive existence.  That becomes obvious by watching a snake in a cage, a little aquarium, as I have talked about before.  And how you must feed that snake with a little mouse put inside to be eaten when the snake is hungry.  Sometimes, the snake isn’t always immediately hungry.  It might let the little thing run around with the illusion of freedom until, finally, the snake decides to eat the mouse and swallow it whole, while the mouse, tied to its fate because there is no other option, looks upon the world helplessly. 

When you understand the nature of politics it really comes down to the feeding of mice to snakes.  The purpose of an administrative state and, ultimately, a deep state is to build a society of food for the snakes of politics.  Easy food that is placed in a cage to consume whenever the snake decides it wants to eat.  Most of the administrative state’s service is to create mice for this purpose, for those who run the political order to eat at their will.  And of course, the difference between a caged animal and one free and in the wild is that corruption steps into play when the food becomes too easy to eat because the snakes get lazy and want to be fed, as opposed to hunting for their food and earning their way in life.  Once a system is built to accommodate laziness, corruption begins to take over the motivation for everything.  Often, the little mice have no idea their entire existence is planned for them, that they will be fed to the snakes, and that any illusions of freedom leading up to that act are false hopes toward the inevitability.  This is why the swamp hates President Trump: the snakes want to be fed, and Trump is trying to free the little mice so that they can have independent lives. Suppose they are caught in the wild and eaten by the snakes. That’s one thing.  But just dropping the little things into a cage for the lazy snake to consume seems cruel and corrupt. 

If you have ever watched this action, and the snake isn’t quite ready, it will stay coiled up in a corner as the little mouse runs around, even running all over the snake.  At first, the mouse is interested in these new accommodations and runs around looking for a way to understand where it is.  But after a few minutes, the mouse figures out that the snake is there, which is a natural predator.  And the mouse realizes that there is nowhere for it to go.  There is no escape.  Its decisions have been made for it, and its fate is sealed by whoever puts the snake in the cage to feed it.  At that point, the little mouse will coil up next to a water bowl or whatever looks like it might provide a little cover from the snake.  The mouse will get real still as if perhaps the snake won’t notice it, and it might live a bit longer.  There are a lot of people doing this in their lives right now.  They hope to live just a bit longer by appeasing the power of the snakes in their lives.  Of course, once the snake decides it is hungry, whether, for a few minutes or hours when it chooses to eat, it moves into position, strikes at the little creature, and begins swallowing it whole.   The mouse will typically try to stay optimistic for as long as possible.  If the snake has the mouse by the rear, I have seen mice dig around at the ground, pretending nothing is happening even as half its body is already down the snake’s throat.  The nature of appeasing predators is a powerful instinct, but for the mice, it is quickly consumed and never heard from again.  After all, the snake has to eat, and God made the mice its food.  That is how nature designed the process.  Corruption happens when the process of hunting for food is compromised, and the snakes are made pets that serve even higher predators.  And the mice have no chance in such a world, which is essentially what our political order is all about. 

So, who is who in all this?  Where does President Trump fit into the scheme of things, and how can he protect himself from all the snakes that are naturally part of the government operations, who are used to the access to easy food that they have grown to enjoy?  Well, I would say don’t keep pet snakes that you have to feed mice to all the time.  Don’t keep the snakes as pets, but set them free to fend for themselves.  Don’t let the government be the cage in which they must be fed from the administrative state a constant supply of mice to sustain their lazy carcasses.  Snakes are what snakes are, and so are mice.  But don’t corrupt the situation by trying to keep pet snakes.  When Trump first went to Washington, he tried to make the snakes his pets and had to feed them.  And that didn’t work.  This time, it’s time to take them all out into the woods and let them fend for themselves.  They might still eat mice, but that process won’t be made easier through the corruption of making pets out of all of them to serve the government’s leadership, directly or indirectly.  President Trump will be successful in his second term because he won’t bother to feed the snakes this time to appease all the swamp creatures that reside there.  There is no reason to keep pet snakes.  And there is no reason to make them dependent on a corrupt system where easy food is practically placed in their mouths.  And it is to keep that food coming that the snakes act in such scandalous ways.  The way to fix it is not to try to make pets out of them but to treat them as the actual predators that they are. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Women Want Real Men: Turning to traditional roles due to massive progressive failures

I knew this would happen, and I’ve talked about it for a long time. More and more women, especially young, attractive women, are signing up for relationships with traditional men to be stay-at-home girlfriends or wives. They are willing to do all the cooking, cleaning, and home maintenance in exchange for staying home while the man goes out and makes all the money. In some cases, they are even signing legal documents protecting the man from such a relationship where the deal is off if the woman gains too much weight by going over 130 LBs. In that way, sex, which men need voracious amounts of, can be obtained by the stay-at-home relationship whenever and wherever so that the man can get back to work and be productive. It’s obviously a flip on the entire concept of feminism, which has turned out to be a big lie for women. The idea was that they could have everything if only they sold themselves to a career and that their career ultimately served government and international statistics. Women are built for certain things in life, and men have their roles because of many of the social failures that young people are witnessing, with transsexual lifestyle acceptances being the latest disaster; women are turning toward traditions before the progressive movement ruined everything for everybody. This isn’t so much about women losing rights, or the ability to vote, or getting equal pay for equal work. Instead, it’s a rejection of the premise of progressive intrusion into the natural biological desires of the two sexes and how they can benefit each other in relationships. And with the rejection of progressive social relationships, people are looking for a much happier life where their needs are more fulfilled.

This has worked for thousands of years. It’s only been recently, where progressivism altered these roles, and people are unhappy because of it

I’ve been married for more than 35 years, and my wife has been a traditional housewife most of that time. It has caused us a lot of trouble from the peer groups that expected us to pursue some ridiculous life designed by progressives.  Dumb things like, do you guys share dishwashing opportunities?  And how do you divide income if I make all the money?  I have always been, and will always be, a traditional man.  I make the money and give it to my wife to distribute to meet the needs of the family and our domestic life.  We have a very defined division of labor, but the first criterion, of course, is stability because you can’t build a life together without a firm foundation, and that comes from income and everyday things like having access to a car and ensuring that there are resources for a woman to build a family with.  Women are not very happy when they don’t have resources to work with.  So, for a traditional man, that means no matter what, that basic foundation has to be maintained.  In our life, especially early on, I had to do extraordinary things to provide that security, including riding bicycles to work 12 to 20 miles one way and working multiple jobs to ensure enough money was coming into the family because we could only afford one car.  And I always made sure she had the car so the kids would have that basic security.  So sexual expectations and weight tolerances are certainly part of the story, but first, security had to be provided and there is nothing that causes instability in a relationship than some man crying about how unfair the world is and how he wants to share all the responsibilities of domestic life with a woman, as he was taught in his socialist government schools.  This entire scam has dramatically turned women off. 

My mom was one of the few stay-at-home moms in the 70s and 80s and she certainly paid for it.  Socially, she was ridiculed by the other moms to no end.  But all the kids I knew wanted a mom like her.  When I met a beautiful girl who wanted to be a stay-at-home mom at an early age, even though it wasn’t convenient then, I took the plunge into marriage because I knew how rare it was to find a woman who wanted even to be a traditional housewife.  Even as a young person, I had defined opinions about the adverse effects of feminism.  I could deal with women who wanted to work in the world, but for building a family, I had strong ideas about it.  So when I found someone who shared those opinions, we got married and started making a life traditionally because all the progressive family tampering was not for us.  As a result, our children grew up expecting much the same kind of thing because that’s what works in family building, even if the men aren’t of the same quality as they used to be, which is why a lot of women are desperate to get out of the rat race now.  Melania Trump has been an excellent example of this type of relationship.  Sure, she married a wealthy playboy, which came with all kinds of problems.  But she has managed to use her beauty and intelligence in very productive ways to raise a son with the kind of attention she wanted to apply, and the results have been good for her.  Of course, all the women not so fortunate to have beauty like Melania, and who will never be able to attract a wealthy billionaire to have such a lavish lifestyle, hate her.

I learned all I wanted about these matters in the fifth grade, and one of the cutest girls in school wanted to go steady with me.  Under a lot of pressure from other girls, I said yes.  She asked me, and I wasn’t interested in girls yet.  But then I had to go to her house because that’s what girlfriends and boyfriends did.  I didn’t know what to expect; I thought we’d play a game or draw pictures.  I had no idea.  No, she was interested in sex, and she was very experienced.  She lived in one of those new neighborhoods back in the 70s where most of the moms worked, and all the homes were dual income.  That might sound strange since that is the status of most homes these days.  But back then, it was just becoming a thing.  She had already been naked for every boy in the neighborhood, and that was her idea of what a boyfriend and girlfriend did together because there were no parents around to teach anybody anything.  And that was the start of today’s disaster, which I rejected immediately.  I called my parents to come and get me, which was the end of that forever.  As soon as I could find a young woman who thought the same way or similar to me on these family matters, I wanted out of the rat race, and we have been married for 35 years.  Most of our problems over the years were due to outside pressures built by progressive expectations.  Not in our relationship with each other or the family roles we have taken on in a division-of-labor way.  And it has been challenging.  Not because the relationship itself was complicated but because the social expectations that came from ridiculous rules of feminism were so outrageously broken.  And now, many people, especially women, are figuring out that they want the traditional roles because the world is broken and offering them nothing but misery.  Which, based on my experience, doesn’t surprise me in the least. 

Without question, the root cause of feminism and communist, progressive thought was that only the most attractive women could get access to the best men.  Unattractive women, no matter how much make-up they put on would not be able to get anything but the slugs in life to pair with.  So the anti-family progressives reading straight out of Karl Marx came up with this idea of fairness, in destroying all men so no women could have the good ones, because there were none to get.  And then the plan was to send women of all kinds into the world to be enslaved for corporate/government alliances to determine value.  Then the plan was to let the government schools raise the children of any marriages that were attempted.  And in all that social engineering, that went against the happiness of human beings, these people have ruined life for everyone.  In what they started as an attempt at fairness, fairness for people lacking attractiveness or good family structures and domestic skills would destroy opportunities for everyone.  But now, when it’s so apparent that these failures are occurring in every part of our lives, attractive young women are dropping progressive politics and converting to tradition because it is to their advantage to do so.  And in so doing, they are finding happiness, which will cause many to follow after them, wisely.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Men of Butler County, Ohio Are Too Busy Getting Their Nails Done to Stand up to Bullies: Republican Party endorses Roger Reynolds for Auditor, Thomas Hall is found innocent of any ethics violations

The number one question I get asked lately is, “where are the men of Butler County, Ohio?” People see what happened to Roger Reynolds, the auditor of Butler County, who is running for re-election but has seven indictments against him pushed by Sheriff Jones. They wonder why nobody has stood up for Roger. The indictments are apparent abuses of power coming out of the Sheriff’s office, yet few people have stood up to the Sheriff to defend Roger, and many don’t understand why. The ethics investigation into Thomas Hall has resulted in him being found not guilty of any trouble, even though Sheriff Jones pushed hard to find something to bust the young man on. The Sheriff even went way out of his way to try to primary a replacement candidate during the re-election of the State Representative of the 46th District. Thomas had to hire a lawyer to help clear his name, which is part of the abuse of power game. These public employees love power because it gives them leverage over people to quell their thirst for the abuse of it, and it costs money to defend against that power in courts that are essentially run by the same forces. I backed Thomas when it wasn’t popular to do so, and Jones backed Matt King and put many of his resources behind the young challenger. But Thomas won anyway, despite all the dirty politics. Recently while the Lakota superintendent was being interviewed by police he sent a message to his friend, Sheriff Jones, hoping for help in the matter of him being caught having “pillow talk” about three kids who go to his school where he wanted his wife to “drug them, molest them, and video them” for his sexual gratification, he reminded Jones that I was the same person who supported Thomas Hall in the election that was an embarrassing loss for the Sheriff, implying that law enforcement should look the other way on his issue because of it. There is a whole heap of dirty politics to go around in just those few examples, and you better believe it, there are many more cases not even talked about. This is why many are asking where the men are these days, and I say they are out getting their nails done, filling out their Fantasy Football picks, and being nice little compliant progressives that the modern world told them to be, while crime, bullying, and evil go unmolested in county politics. 

I’ve talked to people involved on the inside of the dispute between Roger Reynolds and Sheriff Jones. They used to get along just fine until a couple of things happened, which we have to talk about because Jones is the one who decided to abuse his authority behind the law to try and destroy Roger Reynolds over ridiculous conditions. I saw an ad the other day asking the question ahead of the election, “would you support Roger Reynolds with your money even though he has seven indictments against him and is facing jail time?” Well, YES! I know why there are seven indictments against Roger Reynolds, and I think they are bogus charges by a rigged system by a political enemy who has sought power and position to use government to control people, and I don’t like it one bit. Roger Reynolds knowing what I know about the case, is an innocent man being prosecuted by a system of bullies who have used politics to destroy people for personal reasons. And with Roger, one of those issues was that he let go of a family member of Sheriff Jones because they had worked in the auditor’s office and stopped coming to work because of Covid. We have all seen many employees abusing the Covid protocols set up by the out-of-control CDC, and this was a person who needed to be at work. But they were following the government nonsense regarding Covid, so Roger let them go as a non-essential worker. Nobody can say what Sheriff Jones thinks or doesn’t but judging by his behavior and what he has said to others, he then used his power and position to destroy Roger Reynolds and teach him a lesson for not keeping his family member employed. But logic would say that Roger Reynolds did the right thing. 

Then there was the incident over disclosure where Roger and Sheriff Jones were talking about maintaining records for the public. Roger Reynolds is a full-disclosure kind of guy, but Sherrif Jones wasn’t. As he said to Roger, “I don’t want someone sitting on their toilet to know how I’m spending my money. If you do it, I’ll have to do it too,” or something to that effect, according to the witnesses. Well, Roger Reynolds pushed for it anyway, so it’s at that point that the political war between them moved into all the ugliness that led to those seven phony indictments that were led by Channel 19, who started the story. (they’ll do a phony story for the Sheriff but not a legitimate story about Lakota schools, how about that)  Then Sheriff Jones pulled all his strings to set the indictments into motion to get rid of Roger Reynolds and put Bruce Jones in his place, the current fiscal officer of West Chester. I know Bruce Jones quite well. He was the campaign manager for Venessa Wells, who was running for the Lakota school board before she got so sick of the politics and wanted to drop off the slate card with party endorsement.

Venessa also received all the divorce information that led to the trouble with Matt Miller, the Lakota superintendent and the pillow talk about children that have him in so much trouble. Do you see how all this connects? Yet we don’t see Sheriff Jones indicting Miller. The law is used as a weapon to protect public employees from public management, not as an instrument of justice, and that is what has people so upset. I like Venessa; I like Bruce; I even like Sheriff Jones. In my experience, Sheriff Jones respects masculinity and tough people. But if he thinks he can get by with pushing people around, he certainly will. I’ve never had a problem with him, but I hear about all these terrible stories from just about everyone leaving people to wonder where the men are to defend against such bullies.                                                   

I am happy to report that the great Butler County Republican Party has endorsed Roger Reynolds for the upcoming election despite the seven Sheriff Jones indictments. This is even with Sheriff Jones being in the leadership of the Republican Party. The thing about politics is that people aren’t supposed to always get along. There are supposed to be fights and testing of the resolve for it to work, and Roger Reynolds has certainly shown himself to be tough and not back down from a fight.   It shouldn’t have cost him many thousands of dollars as he has to defend himself in court. At some point, Sheriff Jones owes Reynolds a lot of money to compensate him for the political hit job he has endeavored to utilize as an abuse of office to inflict catastrophic political damage to an innocent man. Nobody trusts the law when they indict Roger Reynolds but lets someone like Matt Miller go free. People see what’s going on. Despite trying to destroy Roger Reynolds out of political revenge, the Butler County Republican Party’s Central Committee did the right thing and voted to endorse Roger Reynolds anyway. So, there is good in the world. Sheriff Jones might not like it, but who cares.   He has put himself on the wrong side of history and obviously acted in ways that were not on the side of right. In public life, all kinds of people abuse their power to control and ruin other people’s lives. Roger Reynolds certainly isn’t one of them. And when it comes to standing up for what’s right, voting for Roger Reynolds on November 8th is undoubtedly a step in that direction. I’ll be voting for him proudly.  As to standing for what’s right, it’s not people who fail to defend innocent children, yet prosecute public officials who promote full disclosure who anybody should fear. There is no reason for men to hide from such bullies behind the skirts of their women while trying to impress them with talk of nail polish and feminine napkins on sale at Walgreens. It’s the bullies who should fear the men of Butler County. And as things stand now, it’s mainly the women who are the only ones standing up for anything.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

Share this:

                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Toxic Masculinity is the Key to Beating the World Economic Forum Attackers: They have no answer to classic American males

It was just over a year ago when I was on a big trip with my family, and we were camping outside of Winterset, Iowa, which was a favorite spot for me because of my love of the book, The Bridges of Madison County. Camping in the area was a haunting experience for me because I had literally spent many thousands of hours thinking about the concepts in that famous romance novel by the now-deceased Robert James Waller. I always thought it was odd that the New York publishing industry, through Warner Books, even allowed such a little book to be put on the mainstream circuit or even that Warner Bros would produce a movie about it starring Clint Eastwood. The book was set in Winterset around the famous covered bridges of the area where a lonely housewife falls in love with a globe-trotting adventurer often termed The Last Cowboy, with Eastwood playing the title character, Robert Kinkaid. The essence of the story was that Kinkaid was the last of the masculine, untamed men in the world and that the lead protagonist, Francesca Johnston, had fallen in love with while photographing the bridges for National Geographic magazine. She was married with grown kids at the time, so her romance with Robert Kinkaid was scandalous for Iowa standards, and after her death, and eventually, Robert Kinkaid’s, when her kids discovered the ill-fated romance, they had a tough time dealing with it. Camping in the region brought many thoughts to me, which led me to ask the same question repeatedly, which is asked in the book, what makes culture and sets the norms of society? In the book, it was never discovered. Still, in my own time, I had figured out that the World Economic Forum set those norms for the strategic purposes of their needs for global domination. While staying at that campsite outside of Winterset and thinking back on one of my all-time favorite books, it all became apparent to me a strategy that was loose in the world hell-bent on the destruction of America.

In many ways, The Bridges of Madison County was meant to be a swan song goodbye to the American era of masculinity. If culture was created and implemented by the members of the World Economic Forum for strategies it had set forth since its opening year of foundation in 1971, then the attack was to get rid of in America, the cowboy image that had built the nation through movies, television, literature, and song, and replace it with a more European beta male concept which is now familiar today. The skinny jeans types, the guys who cry and show emotion to their wives over every little bit of spilled milk. And those who replace the tie with a polo shirt and embrace their lack of testosterone instead of yearning for it. The publishing industry always intended The Bridges of Madison County to be that essential goodbye story for the progressive era to thrive while being somewhat respectful of what built America. Robert James Waller was just the vehicle for their attack from the World Economic Forum’s perspective on the change. It was meant to be a stake in the ground where the entertainment industry forever after would say, “now we move on from this concept of toxic masculinity.” In the book, Francesca decides to stay with her family and not run off with Robert Kincaid, which was meant to be a metaphor for America. You might want to be with the toxic masculine superhero. But for the good of humanity, you must bury your feelings and endure the pain for the good of all. 

I had gotten up early on one morning in Iowa before the rest of my family had, and watched the dew rise from the emerging sun across the vast plains of Iowa and considered what a scam the whole Bridges of Madison County concept had been. The attack on toxic masculinity was being projected across the world, and the attempt through culture to sell it to people on a mass scale. I personally had always embraced my toxic masculinity without apology, and I raised my family in a very traditional way. My wife and kids are all females who like being females, and that’s great. I would never want to make them into males. But for me, being a man’s man was always the only option, and nothing else was appropriate. I had always been made to feel bad about that, which is why I found The Bridges of Madison County novel so appealing. It took me another 20 years to figure out what the strategy was, and for that, we had to look out beyond America to where the movers and shakers of industry formed culture to understand what was happening. It is now clear what they wanted all along. 

I would say to anybody wondering about such things as toxic masculinity, what makes masculinity toxic, and to whom? The members of the World Economic Forum always meant to attack America, and they wanted all the old cowboys out of the way. In their support of The Bridges of Madison County, through the favorable press, book reviews, and putting the author Robert James Waller on a pedestal for that time period, they could essentially get their arms around the Buffalo Bill type of American culture. They put it to death, making way for the beta male archetypes we have seen in movies over the last twenty years, the hapless man, the know-nothing father, the stumbling Chevy Chase type of man, guilt-ridden and bouncing around as a victim in life, instead of being the source of all wisdom and courage that children could look up to. The Bridges of Madison County put that kind of man to death and said goodbye. And all the world was to be like Francesca Johnston, push down their true desires, and do what was socially acceptable. And that social standard was now set by the Desecrators of Davos, the World Economic Forum types, the Klaus Schwabs of the world. They wanted to weaken men and to, thus, weaken society. And in that way, they could destroy America from the inside out. It was all very clear to me on that camping trip in Iowa where the events of the book took place and the eventual Clint Eastwood movie. The heart of America was under attack. The intention was to eliminate toxic masculinity from American life so that the aggressor in the World Economic Forum could quickly destroy the country for their own goals. And we were all supposed to put up with it for a greater good determined by them. But to fight back against that trend, all that must be done is to embrace that toxic masculinity because the secret is that masculinity is only toxic to the weak beta males of Europe and the Desecraters of Davos types. They are not prepared to deal with American masculinity, so if you want to beat them, embrace it. Don’t shy away from what you are, men. Be a man, an alpha man at that, and if you do embrace such a thing, the World Economic Forum types have no answer. If you want to win this war, don’t let them trick you into becoming a beta man, crying over every little thing, and sharing your feelings like some cry baby. Wear the cowboy hat, wear the cut-off sleeves of a favorite shirt. Lite up that big V8 engine in that beat-up pickup truck, and don’t fall for the schemes given to us through culture of the very people who want to destroy America. Send them running the other way and make them cry in the night at their failure. Because of what they have done, they deserve it.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

They Killed James Bond: A warning to us all that nobody escapes from progressives

They Killed James Bond

Studios were surprised in Hollywood when the new James Bond film No Time To Die didn’t blow the doors off the box office over its opening weekend.  Like every other underperforming fool these days, they wanted to blame Covid, which governments created to commit election fraud, not that they killed James Bond in the movie.  Who thought that was a good idea?  After 60 years of narrow escapes, they found a way and a time for James Bond to die at the end of No Time To Die. They probably should have taken their own advice given to them in the title. It was just another disappointment that we are all getting used to strong, white, male characters that progressives think they can kill in stories and replace them with women or people of color for the sake of the visual aspects of things and that people would accept it.  Over the last two years, as we have waited for this movie to come out, the rumors of the next James Bond being a woman, a gay guy, or all kinds of other things have been discussed openly.  When the movie finally opened, enough people had enough.  It leaked out that this Daniel Craig James Bond was going to die, and people weren’t exactly in a rush to see it happen.  It’s not enough to make a technically good movie; James Bond is one of those special cases where he’s a hero who always gets away, like Bugs Bunny.  But then again, Bugs Bunny is pretty much banned these days too.  Any strong characters without obvious flaws in the mind of progressives are a danger to their politics, so they look to get rid of them and replace them with flawed, mortal characters who are easy to control by the government. 

This isn’t unique to the Bond film franchise.  I have written many hundreds of thousands of words about the failure of Disney to handle the Star Wars franchise.  It was astonishing that given all the great resources they had in Star Wars left to them by George Lucas, that they screwed it up so badly.  Yet when I saw The Force Awakens back in 2015, it was clear that when they decided to kill Han Solo, the plan was the same as Bond.  Kill off Anglo-Saxon white men in the public’s minds so their rule over mankind will end, starting with stories.  Then replace them with people of color and women, and make them like it.  That was essentially the goal of the new Star Wars films, and people rejected them so severely that the brand is now permanently damaged.  Disney has a new CEO who has been brought in to fix things.  Lucasfilm is also moving people around who like Star Wars to repair the brand, which will take years if possible.  I think they’ll make things better, but the damage is already set.  Some things you can’t tamper with.  If a character has a special place in people’s minds, you better treat them well and not take them for granted.  Otherwise, don’t expect to use them to drive box office results while at the same time appeasing all the anti-capitalist radicals who have infiltrated leftist thinking for communist domination of the world. 

Star Wars is an easy one to see because it’s so obvious.  As big of a company as they are, Disney never understood why people liked the film franchise.  Some of the plotlines they have introduced then rejected over the last several years indicate that Kathy Kennedy never understood why the films she was invited to produce worked, like the Indiana Jones films and all the Steven Spielberg projects she was a part of.  Because she thought she could interfere with what the public liked and that as long as space creatures and spaceships were flying around, that people would buy a ticket to her liberal propaganda.  Well, as it turns out, that’s not how things work.  People want heroes they can believe in.  People worth watching who manage to outsmart the bad guys. That’s why people buy a movie ticket.  Reality is tough enough.  When people enter a darkened theater, they want to see hope. 

I think movie box office results are some of the best votings there are.  People truly vote with their feet.  It’s not easy for Democrats to cheat the vote because they still can’t control what people like.  Ultimately people decide what they like and see and if they don’t want to see James Bond getting killed.  Then they won’t see it happen.  They might catch the movie on cable later, but they aren’t going to pay money to see it happen.  One of the clear political strategies that China has in mind for America and all the Davos insurgents is to rob our culture of hopes and dreams and instead show that even James Bond eventually gets it in the end.  Filmmakers seem to want to praise those types of people at cocktail parties rather than being blamed for being just another capitalist producer who put profits over the party.  The ultimate check on that power is to reject those films at the box office, which happened with the new James Bond film.  They killed Bond.  And the box office reflects that people didn’t want to see it happen. Just as Disney killed off Han Solo and thought they could replace him with some Dora the Explorer character, and they’d still make money.

Yet to continue to hide these things from the public, every time they get caught, Covid is used to hide the incompetence of the participants.  No Time To Die was supposed to be released in early April of 2020.  It has had its release date pushed back many times, finally hitting theaters in October of 2021, really at a terrible time for a Bond film.  This is what the Great Reset looks like, folks.  Incompetent people release their movies that used to be valuable to the public.  The public forgets about them and moves on to other things, and when the results don’t come out the way stakeholders expect, well then, they blame Covid.  Ultimately, governments have interfered with the marketplace, and the bootlickers have wasted more time appeasing them than actually trying to make a movie people want to see.  The governments are the new audience to appease, not the popcorn-eating public, and these projects are flat and boring.   And coming out of a disappointing time when governments tried to completely take over our healthcare with a made-up crisis in Covid, built in a Wuhan lab in China by Dr. Fauci NIH funding, movie producers are trying to take away anything that might be considered good in our movies and entertainment.  Their message to us is, “see, even James Bond gets it in the end.  Not even he can escape our power.” It shouldn’t come as a surprise to any of us, given what we have seen from authority figures in 2021.  The bad guys wrote this latest James Bond film as propaganda for the future they want to control.  That understanding makes me proud to see that people didn’t get suckered into it and decided to stay home.  No Time To Die didn’t come up short at the box office because of Covid.  People are starving for reasons to get out of the house.  They aren’t scared of the virus.  No, they don’t want to see one more icon of western civilization killed in front of their faces, which was the intention of the woke James Bond of this modern age.  People voted in a way that Democrats couldn’t steal, and it shows in the box office ultimately. 

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

To Be a Man

Well, I suppose anything can happen. During a little speech given during a Town Hall he did with the NBA star Steph Curry in Oakland, California I have to say for the first time in my life that I agree with the former president. Which is unusual because I think of Obama as a hostile agent of the American Constitution who deliberately pushed a socialist agenda of economic collapse and social destruction on the very foundations of American lifestyle and have found him to be a despicable human being. But his comments about manhood and the role they play in society in that town hall are things I agree with nearly 100%. Young people, particularly boys, need to hear from the older generation in just such a fashion much more often and Obama did a lot of good with his comments worthy of praise.

I don’t do it often, but every single time I do in some way or another when men and women are out together talking and letting their hair down a bit, there are always subtle jokes about the role men and women play together. The assumption is that men are obligated to be subservient to the feminist movement which is completely stupid because it ignores the biological needs the sexes have for their interactions. But this women can do anything a man can social movement has been very destructive. I’m not sure its been good at all for women, but it has surely been detrimental to men. Among the current millennials it is as bad as I’ve ever seen it, the sentiment is essentially a “bros before hoes” kind of thing that is a direct spawn of this entire problem, what role do men play in society and how should one act.

The void in leadership on this topic has given rise to the rap culture, another direct attribute of progressive ambitions that are completely destructive to the human race and it was in that direction that Obama directed his comments to young men. I thought it was bold to say that he only needed one woman in his life, and that there was no reason to wear gold chains to proclaim their wealth as an advertisement of personal worth. That men should be pillars of good example and have that inner self-confidence that was comfortable with themselves so that others might follow them. Those are all great things to say so Obama deserves credit for taking leadership in that direction. I was a little surprised in Steph Curry’s reaction. I know the kid can shoot a basketball but he seems pretty immature to be a superstar that so many people look up to. What I know about him prior to this Town Hall is that he doesn’t believe America landed on the moon and that he’s a political radical who refused to go to the White House after his NBA team has won several championships. It sounds like he needed to hear some manly wisdom more than anybody.

I get it, the progressive era sought to destroy masculinity and introduce this whole gender-neutral mess because they wanted to destroy the American family and replace it with a parental government. That was the entire reason for their feminist attacks on masculine attributes—to neutralize the role men play in society. But in the process, they have also thrown out all the good things as well, things that women desperately want in their lives—men who stand for something and aren’t a bunch of douchebags who have no values or a desire to exhibit them. What progressives have done to men has been deliberately destructive and harmful to the human race, so it comes with some surprise that Barack Obama said the things he did. Those comments about men are undoubtably true, but for him to say them as a progressive himself was quite something.

I’ve had the misfortune to raise two daughters in this progressive age and it has been painful. I’ve had to watch them date young men who were clearly not worthy of their time and energy. Young men to declare their own independence from the progressive expectations have responded by becoming lazy, uncaring and just outright slobs. It used to be a man would dress up for a woman to have a date and work hard to get a little kiss. The young men of this modern time just show up for a date with their pants down already and expect sex the way someone might turn on a television. For young women like my daughters they have been robbed of the beauty and wonder of healthy relationships, because the world they live in doesn’t respect such things, because the men have had their part of that role robbed from them culturally. And that was on purpose as well, if women were allowed to enjoy their sexual roles with men, then they might want to start families and maybe even stay out of the workplace caring for their children—and nobody could have that. If children grew up with two parents loving and caring for them, then those kids might not grow up looking to government to solve all their problems which was the subtle plot behind progressivism all along. Destroy the roles the sexes play with each other, encourage abortion so that new family creation is limited, keep males and females from forming healthy relationships so they turn to government for their needs, and eventually turn all attention toward a centralized government overseer.

It has stunned me to see how many young people are on CareSource as their primary insurance provider and how addicted to government they all are. When my kids would tell the boys of their lives how hard I worked to make sure everyone had everything they needed the response was, “well good for him. I’m not doing that.” Their reference was in the way I raised them. I worked on average 80 to 110 hours every week for most of their childhoods. My reasoning was to keep their mother home so that there was always a parental figure around for them. I always made sure that their mother had a car even if I had to ride a bicycle to my jobs to keep them at home safe with reliable transportation. And I still spent lots of time with my kids as a father doing fatherly things. Sure it was hard, but doing the job of being a real man often is, and it can be very rewarding for everyone when its done right. But my kids had to go through the disappointment that most of the men of their age group didn’t have such desires or experiences. Mostly, the men of today come from broken homes where the male figure is a worthless piece of crap giving terrible examples of how boys should grow into men themselves. And its been a real problem.

So for Obama to say the things he did I thought took guts and was very beneficial to the young people watching. It will of course take hundreds of thousands of such speeches to undo all the current damage, but it’s a start. I wish boys would listen to such a town hall and immediately become better in their aims to be men, but they’ll have to hear it a lot more before even thinking of changing anything. But it was still good to hear and I never thought Obama would be the one I’d praise for doing so. He deserves some recognition for his efforts, God knows that the young men of this generation need to hear it.

Rich Hoffman

Sign up for Second Call Defense here: http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707 Use my name to get added benefits.

The Politics of Sex: Using primitive emotions to control Republican intellegence from exposing reality

It was good to see Donald Trump fly into Las Vegas to campaign against Wacky Jackie ahead of the midterm elections. Any rational mind would look at the typical Democrat and understand that there is a lot “wacky” about them. The mind of a liberal just isn’t normal and they are prone to massive corruption. Of course they justify that corruption with the belief that majority opinion rules, so if what they think is a democratic sampling of insanity votes to make it a mainstream position, then by sheer numbers something can be made so. It is a really baffling concept that freezes most conservative minds, because they can’t even imagine such things as a reality which paralyzes them from taking action. It is insane that so much has been made of Christine Ford’s rape allegation against Brett Kavanaugh just a few hours before the senate was set to vote for confirmation of him onto the Supreme Court. The information had been out there for a while yet Democrats had waited until just the last-minute to make their move and everyone was just supposed to play along. Everyone knows what’s going on yet the Democrats did it anyway. How are we supposed to take any of this serious? If the incident happened at all between Christine Ford and Brett Kavanaugh it was 36 years ago when they were little high school kids. Nobody called such things rape back then, it was just a party and virtually everyone behaved in such ways. Most of the female population and many males could have considered themselves raped if the criteria is what Christine Ford indicated. She is either ridiculously timid if she suffered trauma from an incident like what she described, or she’s just a liar trying to make a political move against a guy who is poised to be a conservative judge on the Supreme Court and as a liberal, she just can’t have that. Would she make up stories to make it so, well, yes.

I was reminded about these insane women who call themselves Democrats when I started to notice Kathy Wyenandt signs around the neighborhoods surrounding my home. She is running for the 52nd Ohio House District as a former Lakota school levy supporter—another tax and spend liberal. Only with her I have some history. My wife recently drug me out shopping and we were at the Kroger Marketplace over by Lakota East and I was reminded of the time that I had a full-blown explosion toward the levy supporters when they stood outside that shopping complex with a survey about me attacking my character in much the way liberals are now attacking Brett Kavanaugh. And it really pissed me off. It has been a few years but I never lost my anger over it and it was all the radical women who ran in Kathy Wyenandt’s group which I would eventually call latté sipping prostitutes because of the way they whored themselves out to the government union interests. It never seemed right to me that they could stand outside of a popular shopping center and call me every name in the book because I have been the face of tax increase resistance in my local community, but the minute I called them names in return you would think I beat them over the head with a bat the way they cried and protested in response. And their justification was that they were women and that somehow, I was a man and I owed them something by way of unearned respect. All I saw was a bunch of fat-assed losers who wanted to raise taxes on our property values and give that extra money to ridiculously paid union workers.

Just looking at Kathy Wyenandt’s endorsements for this Ohio House run that she is conducting and the evidence is clear, they are mostly all unions and progressive groups who are trying to use her femininity to win a House seat for the dirty Democrats. And the politics is the same as in the Lakota school levy situation where a bunch of crazy women were supposed to be allowed to call me every name in the book because I was a man who stood against higher taxes, and they expected to be unchallenged—because they were women. Their ideas about things were supposed to be beyond scrutiny just because they were women. We were supposed to have no value judgement against them, because they were women. Even Kathy Wyenandt’s campaign pitch is that we are supposed to vote for her because she was a “mom.” The entire proposal has always been insane, but it hasn’t stopped Democrats from using that insanity to advance their position.

Well, I have never accepted such a ridiculous notion and I never will. Back at that Kroger incident when I was on WLW radio I really didn’t understand the drama. The men at the station, the producers and talk talent thought I was crazy for even challenging the position that the levy moms were proposing, that as a man there was an unspoken rule that we were all supposed to just yield to whatever some crazy woman thought and said. Even high-ranking Republicans who were working with me on that anti-tax campaign were terrified of pissing off those levy moms and it never made a bit of sense. Women were obviously exploiting in men a primal weakness, the capitol of sex in relationships to control voting blocs. If women didn’t get what they wanted the men didn’t get sex. If you peeled away all the pretense of politeness away, that was essentially what was happening, and men were supposed to support sheer insanity just because women might take away the chance to have sex.

Even right now when this discussion about Brett Kavanaugh comes up and whether or not Christine Ford was raped at a high school party, men are expected to play along or not get sex from their radical feminist wives. Of course, not all women are radical feminists, but those who call themselves Democrats are nearly all crazy. It comes with the territory of being a Democrat. If a man was to go to BW3s to watch Monday Night Football with a group of six or seven women and the man was to say something like, “Christine Ford probably wanted Kavanaugh and she threw herself all over him at that party for which he likely wasn’t even there, but he knocked away her advances leading up to the incident. She probably found some loser who was drunk and tried to molest him to get revenge then under the new definitions of the #METOO movement and used her sexuality to advance her modern political agenda,” the women would laugh and declare that he was right. But they would then chastise him for even saying it and if he stuck with the story they’d push him out of their circle. So guys being guys not wanting to be away from the opportunities that can come with knowing women keeps his thoughts to himself. He may talk about it with other guys, but he certainly won’t let it out around women because it might get him removed from their inner circle. And that often means for the man, less sex.

It is in that way that so many men, specifically Republicans, have been tricked into buying into all this liberal garbage advanced by crazy Democrats. To accept that Christine Ford was so traumatized over events that occurred 36 years ago but that it all climaxed just days before Brett Kavanaugh was to be confirmed to the Supreme Court, you have to be a little insane to even entertain the notion. But because she’s a woman we are supposed to not even ask any questions about integrity because the Democratic proposal is that all women are to be believed no matter what they say. Or as Kathy Wyenandt wants us to believe, because she’s a mom. But of course, that’s not enough, and at least Donald Trump is not playing along, just as I can say that I never have. When he called the Democratic challenger in Nevada to a seat in congress “Wacky Jackie,” Trump was showing more than just some comic association, he was attacking the primary strategy of the Democratic party, using women to avoid criticism to take back seats of government liberalism. And hope that the tricks against men work yet again. But this time I don’t think they will. Because this time people are finally starting to understand how the game is played against them—for both men and women.

Rich Hoffman

Sign up for Second Call Defense here: http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707 Use my name to get added benefits.