Nancy Nix and I have strong feelings about Roger Reynolds’ decision to run for Butler County Commissioner. We have been very supportive of Roger after he found himself in a lot of trouble with a court case that accused him of abusing his office. While we believe what happened to him was not fair, and we have both worked to help him restore his name, we have been surprised by his behavior, especially his attempt to return to public office in the way he is. Politically speaking, we have moved on to the next generation of consideration and have selected Michael Ryan to be the next Butler County commissioner in a race that presents some challenges. It involves an incumbent, so support for a challenger needs to be focused and have the backing of the party. And now that Roger Reynolds, aware of these difficulties, has decided to split the vote even further, making it even harder for Michael Ryan, it has a personal aspect to it that Nancy and I chose to discuss in front of a camera, rather than on the sidelines somewhere. Nancy had stood by Roger throughout his court case and was really the only friend he had left in county politics. So when he turned around to sue her for his old job back, after she had stepped in as Butler County Auditor to make sure his old office didn’t fall off the rails, the hurt was quite defined. We both wanted to see good things happen to Roger, but the way he was going about trying to restore his name was an all-too-grotesque reminder of what had gotten him in trouble to begin with. Because, in truth, even though we feel that what happened to Roger was unfair, the cause of the problem in the first place was a personality issue that was now manifesting itself, working against the people who had tried to help him the most in the first place, and it was alarming to discuss.

Roger is not a political newcomer. He understands what he’s doing by joining the commissioner race this late in the process, which is the same kind of self-centered action that got him into trouble in the first place. Even if you have political enemies within the Republican Party, how you deal with that problem says a lot about the kind of person you are. And that personality trait is what now has Nancy and me talking as an answer to the many people who think that we should automatically support Roger Reynolds because he decided to run for public office, due to our previous support. While our opinions about the case didn’t change, the court case process did reveal elements of Roger’s character that give us pause. I can promise I would never find myself in the situation that Roger Reynolds did. I have a lot of enemies who are always looking for me to stumble upon something, and that is part of the cutthroat world we live in. And when it comes to the testimony that was most damaging to Roger Reynolds in his dispute against Sheriff Jones and Ohio Attorney General David Yost, it was his personality that ultimately turned out to be his downfall. The love of seeing his name in lights after winning a political seat and the feeling of redemption that such an office brings with it. Obviously, the need to run for public office is mainly for Roger Reynolds, not for the benefit of the seat. Because Nancy Nix stepped into his old auditor role and has done an excellent job, the job performance in that position actually improved, and the people of Butler County were well served in the exchange.
And that is where things start getting nasty in this commissioner race. Nancy and I have been thinking about the next generation, the kind of politicians who have a clean slate and many years ahead of them. And we endorsed Michael Ryan because of the extended runway he has ahead of him, which doesn’t have court cases and corruption charges attached to it. And honestly, as cutthroat as politics can be, I doubt Michael Ryan will ever find himself in the kind of trouble that Roger Reynolds did, because he knows how to work with people instead of against them. One thing that got Roger in trouble, which is why Nancy and I decided to take a pass on him for an endorsement for the commissioner job, is that he seems to like the titles that politics gives him too much. That certainly came out in the trial. The testimony that Jenni Logan, the former treasurer of Lakota schools, showed in his trial was embarrassing to me. As it turned out, I still supported Roger, but with considerably less enthusiasm. Knowing Jenni as I have for many years, there are elements of that conversation that should have never happened. I would never find myself in that same trouble, that is for sure. And that is a sign of a deeper problem that Roger Reynolds needs to work out. Private sector work is a good place to do that kind of thing. Getting back into party politics in a helpful way would be another. However, attempting to emerge with a crash-and-burn strategy to recover name recognition was the kind of bad decision that made the trial, with Jenni Logan’s testimony, so damaging.
For Nancy, as we discussed on camera, the breaking point came when Roger sued her to regain his old job and decided to turn against her. It deeply hurt her. As we were talking, her eyes welled up as she fought back tears. It took a lot of courage for her in the height of that political situation to go against the logic of self-preservation and to stay by Roger’s side during that complex court case, as a friend. Because that same arrogance that got him in trouble in the first place was now being turned on her, because the title of a job that doesn’t pay that much was much more important to him. And now, as she was trying to build a team in politics that actually got along and worked together for the benefit of voters in elected offices, Roger was seeking redemption by tearing it all apart for his own purposes. And while we can certainly understand wanting to restore a name, we don’t understand burning down positive things as a means to do it, which is why he found himself in court in the first place. We all have political enemies. Some of them are vicious. I have a lot of nasty enemies who would love to bring significant harm to me if they could. But it’s up to me not to fall into those traps. Nancy Nix is a very popular and influential character. She has the Vice President of the United States just a phone call away, as well as Vivek Ramaswamy and many other national figures of great significance. The chance to make the kind of mistakes that Roger made is frequent, yet she avoids them and maintains a good reputation, despite the desires of her political enemies to see her downfall. And that begins with being a good person in all phases of life, not in seeking a public position to hide personality flaws at the expense of taxpayers and voters in general. And that is why Nancy and I had a conversation about why we couldn’t support Roger Reynolds for this Butler County Commissioner position. There are steps that he could have used and teams he could have been a part of building. But instead, he went for the kind of slash-and-burn strategy that got him into trouble to begin with, which was a decision he clearly made on his own, regardless of the cost.
Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707












