It’s time for a Paul Harvey moment with this West Chester Tea Party story. After the horrendous hit job by Brian Thomas on 55 KRC, where he took the word of a very politically motivated rabbi at face value and joined in the condemning of that long-time group for antisemitism, there is, of course, a lot more going on. The West Chester Tea Party and I’ve known them for a very long time, is a free speech group, and what we have going on with Rabbi Ari Jun is an attempt to capture speech as he defines it. We have been seeing this a lot lately and the root cause all points back to one person, and one event: Lynda O’Conner deciding to run for school board for another term when she has been grotesquely unpopular over the last few years as she has gone after Darbi Boddy, a fellow school board member that she has been trying to have removed since the very beginning of her term. The Rabbi is just playing his part in trying to politicize free speech, which I am surprised that Brian Thomas played along with. But then again, maybe not. The accusation is that a popular speaker who has done some excellent work, Harold Ziegler, went down the rabbit hole a bit historically at a recent West Chester Tea Party meeting and this Rabbi was tipped off to the contents, which talked about the Rothschilds being Jewish people who control banking and other conspiracies that are deemed off-limits by the big government crowds who want to use Chinese style communism to use speech to steer society in the direction that they decide is appropriate or not. That should be very clear to Brian Thomas, so it was quite surprising that he didn’t provide any pushback on the Rabbi during their hit piece interview, where they rejoiced that the West Chester Tea Party lost their meeting venue over this controversy, a victory against free speech that Rabbi Jun was clearly aiming for.
https://x.com/overmanwarrior/status/1704940264320815600?s=20
Many people don’t know their history and use the same buzzwords as progressives regarding racism. There are words you can or can’t say and these people in positions of institutional authority will decide what those things are; Rabbi Jun thinks he’s one of them, working on behalf of Lynda O’Conner, which leads us to the rest of the story, as I can fill in the blanks based on my knowledge of the people involved. They will never admit to these things, but based on my history with Lynda, it’s pretty clear what’s happening. A few weeks ago there was a meeting in Liberty Township, a Meet the Candidates event that Lynda was supposed to come to. She declined, and I will provide a video of some tough questions going in her direction. Lynda had another invite, which is traditional for the West Chester Tea Party, to have all the candidates for Lakota come and answer questions from the public. Lynda has had a relationship with the West Chester Tea Party for over a decade, so she knows how things go, they would be more complex questions than she would get at the Voice of America candidate forum, which she prefers because establishment politics controls it. What’s the best way to get out of having to appear? Well, to destroy the forum, which is what the Rabbi did for Lynda by using politically sensitive speech to attempt to destroy them as an organization.
Yet to say that the Rothchild family isn’t up to no good would be to avoid the truth. Just because they happen to be Jewish is not the issue. But many criminals and globalist manipulators hide behind social safety nets of controlled speech to continue their crimes, and the control of the finance industry by the Rothchild family is a known condition that inspires much debate. And that debate is healthy to keep the bad guys in the world in check. So even though the Rabbi didn’t like the things that the West Chester Tea Party was talking about, he doesn’t have some social right to destroy them, even if it’s for a friend running for school board. But that’s what happened; even 55 KRC played their part. It is exciting to see how desperate all these entrenched political players are willing to abuse Constitutionally guaranteed rights for their own acquisition of power. It’s exciting because it is revealing a truth about these people that I have been warning about for decades, and now they are desperate and showing where all the strings to the puppets go. I love the Jewish people and have said it many times. Jesus was a Jew; we have the Bible because of the Hebrew people. Yet the Bible is a story of the Jewish people failing in the eyes of God and always falling short. So, talking about those shortcomings, even if they fail to serve a higher cause and find themselves monopolizing international finance, isn’t dialogue forbidden from discussion. Instead, we should be talking about it because it’s the only accurate checks and balances in society to keep the bad guys from doing worse. The assumption that Rabbi Jun is making, which Brian Thomas backed up, is that if people are of a particular religious order, then the assumption is that they are doing good in the world instead of using that order as a mask for misconduct.
Of course, batching everyone into the same category doesn’t account for the variability of human behavior, which free speech then should sort out, and the burden to prove otherwise falls on the accused. And the Babylon trouble of modern factions dusting off the old pantheon of Mesopotamian gods isn’t a conspiracy; it’s at the heart of the climate change movement. It’s the same battle God was frustrated with in the Bible, predating much of the biblical history that we tend to concern ourselves with. The worship of Baal, Moloch, and Ishtar is at the heart of progressive politics, so the West Chester Tea Party references were made in that spirit, which is certainly worth discussion. But we see the rules of politics being rewritten to penalize a group that wanted to broadcast the truth about the various school board candidates. And because some nasty stuff was uncovered over the last few years, political candidates are trying to remove as much transparency as possible because they can’t hope to be elected any other way. The goal of this event was to destroy the West Chester Tea Party forum to attempt to control a narrative that didn’t help the current political order. And because the story is so bad for the incumbent candidates, they are trying to destroy anybody who might question them publicly, which is what the aggression from the courts toward Darbi Boddy is all about. We see an abuse of power exposed through desperation to control an evil narrative. And the willingness to manipulate speech to become weaponized against political rivals shines a light on the problem. But only if you understand the rest of the story, that this West Chester Tea Party story is about one thing, and one thing only. It was not a controversial speaker who asked questions about Jewish conspiracies. But a political establishment that is trying to hold onto power through the destruction of the Bill of Rights because they never believed in it, to begin with. And they are being exposed for what they were all along.
Rich Hoffman
The Overmanwarrior 