A federal law enforcement official told USA TODAY the suspect has been identified as Omar Mateen and said investigators were reviewing the attacker’s possible utterances that may provide more specific information about a terror ideology or affiliation. The official, who was not authorized to comment, characterized the attack as “certainly’’ terrorism. It was not immediately clear whether investigators were aware of the attacker prior to the assault.
Mina said the gunman was armed with an assault rifle, a handgun and some sort of unidentified device. Officers from multiple agencies and dozens of emergency vehicles responded to the scene. Orange County Fire and Rescue called for gurneys to move victims from the club.
There have been a lot of shootings this past weekend in Orlando, Florida—one of my favorite cities in the world. With an armed robbery at a Wal-Mart Thursday, then the shooting of a young girl and former Voice contestant Friday night by a solitary gunman, the Jihadist terrorist attack of a LGBT nightclub called “The Pulse” was the most violent, by far. As of this writing, 50 dead and about 50 sent to the hospital. So who is to blame? Well, in all these situations the fault is uniformly on the political left for following Saul Alinsky strategies seen below toward collapsing society.
For one, progressives have been very active in promoting the dreadful conditions of LGBT living and late night orgies of low mentality sexual promiscuity. Then on the other hand they have stoked the fires of Jihad by opening American borders and throwing a violent Islamic culture onto our doorsteps putting the two ideologies together with the hope that violence would erupt and that they could fulfill Alinsky’s strategy of removing guns from American society so that terrorists would have an easier time of destroying America for aims of progressive desires for world unification under their rule.
I would suggest dear reader that you respond to this violent event by buying a gun today, signing up for Second Call Defense—to protect yourself legally. (You can do that at the below link) Then make sure you are a member of the NRA in hopes that they might continue their efforts at preserving peace through their powerful lobby so that you might not ever have to use your guns to defend your lives and property from these radical progressive elements strategically put in place to destroy our culture. If it is happening in Orlando-it will be coming to your doorsteps soon—and you’ll want to be ready when it does.
The fault for The Pulse shootings in Orlando, Florida I would place directly on the Obama administration and those connected to it. It is really his failed policies which created the battlefield on both sides. He and his kind have followed Saul Alinsky and this is what you get. Guns are the solution to stopping future violence. Jihad and advocates of it are the villains, and it’s time we designate such things in the proper scope. If people want to follow Jihad they belong on the sand baked deserts of the Middle East where there is no economy or opportunity because of their long acceptance of collectivist based philosophies which has destroyed their ability to develop, culturally. You can’t just plop Jihadists into one of the finest capitalist cities on planet earth and expect them to put up with differing viewpoints—like gay people dancing the night way—literally. It wasn’t guns that caused the problem. It was progressives and their Saul Alinsky inspired insurgencies.
This is what happens when people who come from different places around the world, or adhere to values that are not fundamentally “American” find themselves in positions to rule over others.
LOS ANGELES — A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled Thursday that the Second Amendment of the Constitution does not guarantee the right of gun owners to carry concealed weapons in public, upholding a California law that imposes stringent conditions on who may be granted a concealed-carry permit.
The 7-to-4 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, overturned a decision by a three-judge panel of the same court and was a setback for gun advocates. The California law requires applicants to demonstrate “good cause” for carrying a weapon, like working in a job with a security threat — a restriction sharply attacked by gun advocates as violating the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
“Based on the overwhelming consensus of historical sources, we conclude that the protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public,” the court said in a ruling written by Judge William A. Fletcher.
Those judges voting against the Second Amendment of course are wrong. Guns in American culture are like pasta to Italians, rice to Asians, Fish & Chips to the British, arm pit hair for the French, feathers to the Indian, or piñatas to the Mexicans. It is disrespectful to come to America and proclaim that guns should be removed from our culture. There is nothing wrong with people from other countries coming to America to live the American dream, but it is wrong for them to seek to change anything about the freest country on earth with the garbage they ran from in the first place. It is in that spirit of “change” that Judge William A. Fletcher provided the ruling reflecting the 7-4 decision.
All I can say to those people is that if they don’t understand the language of the 2nd Amendment then perhaps we need another revolution where we can make it a bit clearer for them. Because that is the only path that is acceptable—removing guns from America just isn’t with incremental rulings against the 2nd Amendment to reshape our culture. California is showing that immigration has destroyed its heritage as a sovereign state within America. And they intend to infect the rest of our country with the same strategy. That is of course why we should all carry guns—everywhere.
One of the reasons the political left is so obsessed with skin color is because they like to hide their misdeeds behind racism. But they don’t like to talk about people from other places around the world who come to America but have difficulty merging with the freedom tendencies of our culture. Failures who come from more collectivist based cultures who don’t assimilate well such as Mainak Sarkar, an Indian guy at UCLA who shot his professor while in class, are typically ignored by the media because they don’t advance progressivism. So here is a picture of him allowing the image to speak thousands of words of explanation.
As much as the political left makes fun of people who wear cowboy hats, drive pick-up trucks, and tend to thump the Bible adhering to traditional values–the typically “white” males usually associated with “redneck” culture are not the ones doing all the mass shootings and having a hard time living in America. It’s creations of the political left who have all the trouble–and thus, the fault for the UCLA shootings resides squarely on their shoulders.
While I was on the air with Matt Clark during his WAAM radio broadcast recently he wanted me to talk a bit about my latest Curse of Fort Seven Mile series. However, time ran out and we couldn’t get into the details. Actually, I don’t think I could cover all the details in an hour show, or a 10 hour show. For me, what started as a simple pulp fiction series has evolved into something I would term as a philosophy for the 22nd century. The below videos will help with the context but essentially what I’m doing is this: over the next one hundred years we are going to discover that we are not alone in the solar system, let alone the galaxy. We will learn to defy death. We will unlock all the potentials of a Type 1 civilization and that will require us to completely revisit our current political and religious philosophies—because the present ones just won’t be sufficient. That’s not a knock on anybody, but the discoveries of the next century will just unlock a massive amount of potential that isn’t even forecasted on the horizon as of yet—and people will need some means of thinking about those things if they want to survive.
I have been pretty adamant about my hobbies and positions. I essentially grew up studying mythologies and religious cultures, but I like to make money, so I chose professional endeavors that I could raise a family on—but there is a lot about me that is very sympathetic to the Nathan Drake video game character. The people I most admire these days are people like Josh Gates and his friend Erin Ryder. If I did not love family as much as I do, I would have loved to live the life that they have—and believe me I have no regrets. But I do read and watch a lot of what those fantastic people have put out as far as discovery over the years. When they tackle some crypto mystery much of it comes out to nothing, but it’s the asking of the questions that I find absolutely amazing. There are a lot of people, many whom are featured in these videos who have committed enormous amounts of time and resources to asking hard questions about mankind’s origins—and I’ll be honest—I love each and every one of them. When I listen to their lectures and read their books I think in the best case scenarios, they may be getting 50% of any given idea correct. But even 1% of what these people are saying they are major game changers for the entire human race and the world at large.
Lately, there has been an explosion, likely because of the Internet, of conspiracy theories and examinations into a hidden past that does not agree with the Leaky evolutionary theories. The latest revisions are probably driven more by Jurassic Park’s DNA examples and the popular Lord of the Rings movies about Middle Earth—art has helped our society ask new questions from a fresh perspective—and the answers to those questions might just be explosive. If only 1% is true, mankind is in for some startling revelations. The best movies and books are the ones that make you ask, “what if,” and as the videos included here surmise, there are some very smart people who are asking lots of questions tainted by their personal backgrounds. But it is what they agree on that has stimulated my thinking and focused my mind on the hard evidence that is rapidly pouring in.
I wanted to write another Cliffhanger novel but I wanted it to be relevant to the world 100 years from now the way I read Jules Verne, Ayn Rand, H.P. Lovecraft or even Shakespeare. My favorite play of his is Titus Andronicus. His use of extreme violence to tell the moral story of love and loss—as well as dedication are the kinds of things I find infinitely fascinating and it doesn’t matter when in history we read such a story—they still communicate a truth which is valuable. Having these kinds of interests I couldn’t just write some average piece of fiction reviewers of today would like—I wanted to write something that people a century from now would marvel at and would still draw inspiration from. Yet I also wanted to make the argument that the values America had from around 1870 to about 1900 were the best the world had ever seen, and that those values should be captured in a bottle and examined in actually a scientific way—as having merit on culture building itself. The economic means of the country was explosive during that period, morality was respectable, and collectivism was being defeated wherever it was encountered—namely during westward expansion.
For about forty years I have had in my mind a really terrible antagonist and a concept for painting it into a story against the ultimate protagonist—but I needed to collect a lot of information to tell that story. Finally, I feel like I’m there. Once I had all the details worked out, I went to work writing it—and as I thought, it has turned out to be the byproduct of a hyperactive imagination, a technical background, legitimate scientific investigation and all the life experience learned in every hard way imaginable.
Knowing that over the next couple decades history will have to reflect what we are learning now—and that we will learn that not only are we not alone, but that we are currently in a relationship with thinking beings not from earth’s origin story and that the essential ingredient to a successful society resides within individual behavior as opposed to collective salvation—and that once that process begins—where democracies run by a mob take over the individual input of actual leaders—that all civilizations stop functioning and regress back to their beginnings.
Even as my protagonist, Cliffhanger fights bad guys with flaming bullwhips all in the name of justice—it is important these days to define the merits of that justice. It is not enough to simply show bad and good—it has to be defined by actual universal rules of engagement as defined by the observable conditions of our cosmos. To do that we have to step beyond our veil of politics and modern philosophy and take the next step. Taking that step is what and why I’m committing so much time to this new Cliffhanger story. Similarly to that Cannibals of Cahokia story—this Curse of Fort Seven Mile has the benefit of an additional twenty years of hard living and earned observation. Like H.P. Lovecraft I have a love for pulp fiction written in a romantic fashion—and on the surface that is what these new Cliffhanger stories are. But, my protagonist, Fletcher Finnegan in The Curse of Fort Seven Mile is actually named after one of my favorite literary figures of all time, the giant in Finnegan’s Wake from the James Joyce classic. My goals with the work are not to reach the New York Best Seller’s list, or even to get reviews from Publisher’s Weekly. It is to offer a useful philosophy for people grappling with real significant challenges to everything they believed was true for over 10,000 years and to provide them a softer landing philosophically—so to maybe for the first time in human history to provoke a change in mankind’s propensity to always revert back to the Vico cycle. Thus SpokeCliffhanger.
If you want a preview of this work they are available on the sidebar. But the real meat is yet to come and why I am dedicating some specific time and resources to completing it. To get a sense of it, just watch all these videos and you’ll get your mind ready to read what I’m putting into a story intended for readers of the next century. I’m not giving up on politics. But rather it is too small of a shoe for me now. The next obvious evolution is exopolitical theater and the vast changes it will bring. Currently it is a bit on the fringe side, but that will change rapidly—and when it does–well, people will want a point of reference and fiction is a good place to begin—by bridging what we know with what we will come to understand.
Yes, during this broadcast on WAAM in Ann Arbor, Michigan with Matt Clark, I predicted the end of the Democratic Party. What, Why, How, When and Where I described in some detail during the radio broadcast. Click the link below to hear it for yourself and be sure to pass it along to a friend in need of some energy in these trying times. Don’t worry, help is coming!
Obviously, Obama lost a Obamacare lawsuit, and it was embarrassing. So his administration wanted to change the news cycle. Literally, within hours of losing the court case Obama exceedingly overstepped his executive powers once again by imposing a ridiculous transgender rule against public schools.
Remember what I have said about public schools. If you vote for a school levy you are stupid. If you send your kids to public school, you are taking a serious chance of destroying their minds forever. If you love them, you should home school them, or send them to a private school. Public schools are dangerous, lazy, and obviously corrupt, and by Obama’s actions–are a part of the transgender psychosis promoting the advancement of mental illness as a substitute to logic.
As you can see from the picture Matt used on his Saturday May 7th 2016 broadcast he’s a little concerned about the direction of our country. About three-quarters into the hour-long show which he does each week on WAAM radio in Ann Arbor, Michigan I came on to add a little color. For your own sanity dear reader, you should listen to it now, then pass it along to a friend. It may well just save your life with a small dose of sanity at a key time in our American history.
Matt and I are doing an entire hour together this upcoming Saturday and it will be live, so if you’d like to listen or call in, you can catch the show at 1 PM at this link.
I wasn’t going to say much about it, but now that Donald Trump is the Republican Party nominee and tempers have abated a bit, proper analysis can finally be possible. Context is needed before everyone can move forward. I would think that Objectivists would be happier about Trump than they are. I would also think that Tea Party types would as well. Apparently they have in their mind something else that a POTUS is supposed to be which is really too much to ask. Trump essentially to me is the first Objectivist oriented candidate to ever truly make it to such a high position, and I think the benefits philosophically to our society will be immeasurable. It really comes down to the public versus private sector ability. Public sector approaches are too costly and grossly ineffective where private is much more driven by individual performance and that is the world that Donald Trump comes out of—and it will be exciting to watch.
I’m certainly not an Objectivist from Ayn Rand’s camp. While I admire the work and think it is the best thing the human race has come up with to date regarding management of government resources, it doesn’t go far enough for me. I make it no secret that one of my favorite books is Thus Spoke Zarathustra yet I would say that my thinking about things is naturally evolved further along than Nietzsche—which is understandable. That was over 100 years ago, and we’ve learned a lot since then. Ayn Rand’s work was 50 years ago, so it’s not exactly current. I have decided that I need to take those types of ideas to the next level before I can have meaning in them which is what I’m doing in the Curse of Fort Seven Mile series. I can’t just write stories for commercial endeavor. Even though I enjoy it, there has to be some earth-shaking sense in the work that steers the mind toward the answers for living. While Ayn Rand denied it, I see clearly that her novels were certainly extensions to Thus Spoke Zarathustra—which was to say, a graduation of mankind from a kind of dependent sacrificial being, into a self-aware, self-sustaining creature capable of immeasurable creation through sheer imagination.
Glenn Beck lost me back when he was on Fox News when he’d speak with ill will toward Nietzsche because Beck needed a “God” figure in his life. He and a lot of people like him apparently needed to feel that a “god” was guiding them through some divine providence toward some heavenly revelation—as if the plans for America were tied to the plans extracted from Heaven. To me, that’s lazy thinking—and I deep dive the reasons in my Curse of Fort Seven Mile series. You can’t just trust something that may not be even concerned with our dimensional reality. What might call itself a “god” to us may in fact be a disgraceful devil of some kind and we need our intellects to guide us through those decision gates. Ultimately however, the problem that these types of conservatives have with Donald Trump is that he has certainly graduated in his life away from the need to feel guilt about anything and is living as a self-professed intelligence. Trump to me is very much the character from Thus Spoke Zarathustra who lived in the mountain cave and came down to the village below to teach the world about the Overman. Biblically, Donald Trump is not an icon of virtual, but as a graduate from the necessity to sacrifice one’s essence for the benefit of the collective whole—Donald Trump is the first of his kind to emerge into public office. I say that now because the Hillary Clinton antics with Elizabeth Warren just aren’t going to be able to stop him in a general election. Yet Glenn Beck in his early days and even as recently as the latest Atlas Shrugged movies was very supportive of Ayn Rand, as was Ted Cruz, Paul Ryan, and Rand Paul. They apparently don’t understand what makes the characters great in Rand’s books. It certainly wasn’t a propensity to sacrifice themselves to some “divine providence.” Glenn Beck actually called on people to “fast” to beg God to keep Donald Trump from winning the presidential nomination. That is just ridiculous. Talk about sacrifice—Beck doesn’t understand—he has clearly lost his mind.
I understand that some people need a “god” to hold their life together. You can’t just live a life leaning toward meek sacrifice for 70 years of a life then stop on a dime and say that man has within its mind the power of the universe and that “god is dead,” as Nietzsche did in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. However, the need for a “god” is in mankind’s intellect, and the need to hold on to that crutch has kept our society in this ridiculously infantile state for far too long. You will never get to John Galt’s engine of the world by sacrificing bits of yourselves to a being beyond time and space. Whatever is out there in those folds of time needs to be properly vetted before trust can properly be established—you certainly can’t trust some Roman interpretation of a Christ metaphor passed down to us from the ages of Zoroastrianism. That’s just stupid. While I don’t fault people for their needs intellectually, I do when it comes to crossing the streams of proper government. Thinking is the key to human endeavor, not hoping that a “god” will show mercy and guide us to some Promise Land. We have to make that Promised Land though our intellectual gifts provided by “god,” but we can’t be passive recipients in our approach.
Donald Trump’s harshest critics are those who find it appalling that he is completely a man of his own making, that he seeks only his counsel when making a decision, that he loves himself and isn’t meek, and that he shows an indication toward the complete domination of his enemies. They can’t understand such a person because Trump is free from the need to sacrifice anything to make something—so they can’t understand how it will be possible as president. But praying for a god to save a nation is just as stupid as the athlete who scores a touchdown and points toward heaven as though “god” made such a thing possible. To say that America is great because God is behind it is just as stupid as the Muslims believing that Allah wants them to kill infidels. America is great because the thoughts of mankind have been free to unleash the gifts of imagination manifested into invention and that is something new. Donald Trump is a product of the American system. He is a graduate of individualism and that is what will make him a great president. I know I can trust Donald Trump because he works by the rules of individual integrity—he doesn’t need the judgment of God to keep him from smoking cigarettes or doing drugs—the way Glenn Beck uses God to keep back the demons from his past. Trump cares about himself and his family and he doesn’t want to be viewed by history as being bad, tyrannical, or a loser in any way. He wants to be loved as he loves himself and he wants to give people that feeling that he has when he gets up each morning—it’s the one thing that billions of dollars in the bank can’t buy, and it’s the one thing he wants more than anything in life. He wants the respect of those around him and the way he intends to get it is by the means of the individualists who have written in literature the foundations of our present circumstances—philosophers like Nietzsche and Ayn Rand.
Trump will unlock through his mouth the potential of America and that is the force behind the movement that is now afoot. That movement is what these #NeverTrump people are scared of. They fear that America will head toward Sodom and Gomorra with the inauguration of Donald Trump because they essentially don’t understand the power that drives people on the individual level. For instance, I was at a baseball game at the Cincinnati Reds home park and my wife and I were having diner in the Diamond Club. It was all very nice, the food was on the upside and the drinks were flowing all around us. People were happy, festive and we were all living a life of extreme opulence. The food was too good and many of us were still enjoying it when the game started. When the National Anthem came on everyone stopped and stared at the televisions to watch what was happening out on the field. That entire place went dead silent and everyone was enrapt with reverence toward the greatness of our country. Nobody told anyone to behave that way; it came out of the individual inclination of the collected masses. That is in essence the Donald Trump life. Work hard, have plenty so that there is an excess, and be gracious with that excess. But don’t be a loser, because if you are, you deserve to be bitch slapped into oblivion. Nobody likes a loser and America isn’t a nation of such people. It has been made to feel that way, but it’s time to stop feeling that way. And only Donald Trump can invoke that character once again by returning our nation toward an ideology centered on individual achievement instead of collective salvation. That is where the psychosis of the #NEVERTRUMPs crosses the line because their judgment of good and evil is in violation of the principles of actual success. America can’t afford their immature interpretation any longer. People don’t need to be told to be silent when the National Anthem is playing, and they don’t need to be told to be kind to their neighbor by someone like Glenn Beck. We certainly don’t need any more preachers. We need action by individuals to make our county great again—and we need a salesman to resurrect it within our culture. That is why Donald Trump will be such a great president. He offers a continuation of the philosophies which have evolved over the years toward individualism and now society can see a fine example from the White House which perhaps will save our nation by unlocking that potential in others. That is why the Trump nomination is such a big deal, and why so many people are having a difficult time with it. They don’t have the proper philosophy in their own life to understand–and that isn’t our fault. It’s their problem.
This is what democracy looks like when you have to take your constitutional republic back from communist insurgents bred through our public education system and nurtured through left leaning popular culture to destroy America. Watch the whole thing and send it to a friend.
And guess what; it will get far worse before it ever gets better. As a society we let this get out of hand. Now it will be very violent to get our country back. So be ready for it.
We’d be a whole lot better off if more people had the values of John Wayne. But unfortunately we live in a time when people actually think the Hollywood legend was a racist because our interpretation of those definitions have been defined by these radical left winged insurgents. They won’t give up their position without violence, so let’s give it to them and be ready for what follows. They took it from us, we are only taking it back.
For one, progressives have been very active in promoting the dreadful conditions of LGBT living and late night orgies of low mentality sexual promiscuity. Then on the other hand they have stoked the fires of Jihad by opening American borders and throwing a violent Islamic culture onto our doorsteps putting the two ideologies together with the hope that violence would erupt and that they could fulfill Alinsky’s strategy of removing guns from American society so that terrorists would have an easier time of destroying America for aims of progressive desires for world unification under their rule.
The Overmanwarrior 