Category: The Delphi Technique

Altruism is Evil: Thinking of college? Read “The Fountainhead” first.

Altruism is evil and the education round table that you can see below involving President Obama and his Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is pure socialism, even though such discussions are taking place in every university and public school in the country at every minute of every day. In a recent article that I read about the skyrocketing costs of education and the hopelessness that many young people are now feeling toward college, the article listed one of the non-financial benefits of a typical college graduate as being one who more typically contributes to charitable organizations and volunteer in their communities. The implication of the article was that college graduates are more “socially” conscious and therefore of better service to the human race, thus dictating the need for “higher education.” So Obama and Duncan can be seen in this clip attempting to convince students of the worthiness of going into massive debt to get degrees to jobs that don’t exist, because Obama’s economic sharing the wealth to countries like Brazil and back room deals with most of Europe have decimated the American economy, leaving many college graduates with degrees in business management, and liberal arts to leave college $20,000 to $50,000 in debt and no way to pay it off.

I say this round table discussion is socialism because each member of this little group is deciding how best they are to serve “society” as their first priority. Notice Obama says to the young man, “We need more engineers.” But what Obama does not understand is that the economy needs jobs that will hire engineers, and he implies “WE” as a collective whole, like we are all on the same team—Team America, so the kid choosing engineering is more beneficial to the “team” rather than the “individual” inclination. Another girl at the table says she wants to pursue a degree in entrepreneurial start-ups, but what she doesn’t know is that sounds good in a discussion, but there simply aren’t any colleges who can teach a person to “start something.” If the teacher knew how to make a lot of money with a business start-up, they wouldn’t be teaching—instead they’d make their fortunes in the business world and be one of those evil corporate types who buy boats and have condos in Florida—and watch football games in the box seats. Instead, most of the professors in college are simply socialists, they do not understand capitalism, they do not understand business, and they do not understand life beyond their altruistic fantasies, and they are openly jealous of what they don’t understand—which is a lot. Because of their actual lack of worth, but perceived value by politicians like Obama and Duncan, professors are artificially propped up in their social value, because in education competition is eliminated completely in favor of social engineering, which is why I say that the above conversation is pure socialism, and the kids are participating in it without knowing what it is, or why they are doing it.

Obama in his discussion writes a blank check to education, and you can hear him say it. When he attempts to tell the students why they must be willing to shoulder the cost of college education, he speaks of the costs as if inflation just happened out of thin air and was not caused by the employees of education themselves, and their commitment to socialism as the funding mechanism. Many college professors make over six figure incomes and this is the soul contributor to the extreme rise in costs of college, and nothing else.

Anyone who has been to college in the last 20 years knows that it’s a scam, the classes are too expensive, the books are way over priced, and colleges stretch out over 4 years of study what they should be doing in just 2 years of focused scholastics. These days, the inflation of education is caused by too many students entering a system with too few jobs meaning students must now get a master’s degree to stand out on a resume instead of just a bachelors. Now a student who wants that extra edge is going to school for 6 years instead of 4, which of course means more money for the universities.

The fear that Duncan and the President have is that the bubble is bursting and young people are beginning to realize they don’t need a college education to work at restaurant as a server, because those are the only jobs available at the moment, and young people do not want to enter their adult lives with an average debt of $27,713 which happens to be the Ohio average. Obama only knows that if he tells these kids to stay with college, that he can offer them some bureaucratic job in government sitting in a cubical all day pushing around paper from one end of their desk to the other. Obama knows absolutely nothing about actual job creation, or any of the merits of capitalism, because he subscribes to socialism, (progressivism.)

All schools are socialist institutions. That is why most of the employees in them are open socialists in practice, and they despise capitalism. It is in capitalism that jobs are created 100% of the time. Government jobs are not wealth producers, they are wealth “consumers” since they rely on a tax base to sustain themselves, and this is the crux of the paradox. And each time educators and politicians are confronted with this paradox they resort to altruism, which is why I said it was evil.

Altruism by definition is the belief that acting for the benefit of others is right and good and it simply is not true. That is collectivism and is the mark of socialism which will rot out the core of your country like rust eating away the frame of a car. Educators and politicians avoid the hard facts of reality, such as seen in the above video and then point out that without college graduates that the underprivileged, the meek, the weak of society will be left behind to rot. It is these types of idiots who have caused our society to install wheel chair ramps at every curb, special access to elevators in hotel swimming pools, and taken up all the best parking places at commercial businesses with empty handicapped spots. At a recent trip to an amusement park, I noticed on a crowded day an almost 22 acre empty portion of the parking lot that was unfilled waiting for all the handicapped people to arrive from thin air as the masses of healthy people parked long distances from the entrance for no good reason other to fulfill the altruistic fantasies of parasitic politicians.

My solution to the handicapped issue is to fix the handicaps through science or sheer will power like the most recent player of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. (CLICK HERE TO SEE) But I will tell you a secret that everyone knows, but they do not acknowledge even to themselves, that these altruists that public education and colleges hold in such high regard—the philanthropist billionaires, the community volunteer who is the socialite of every function helping the “poor” and the “under privileged” are sheer looters. They seek to use the disadvantages of others to redeem the sins of their own lives, and this behavior is fed in our education system all across this country and advocated by socialist politicians like Obama and Duncan. These users of other people’s misery pat themselves on the back for passing new laws which allow for more handicapped access to buildings, and impose ridiculous costs on business owners, then preach out of the other side of their mouths that they create jobs, when in fact they destroy them. Altruists are destroyers of goodness, and self-reliance, and this makes them evil. They sell themselves as champions of the weak, but they are actually consumers of the human soul by imprisoning the disabled as hostages for spiritual redemption. If all the illnesses of the world were suddenly removed, these altruists would be frightened beyond their capacity to function, because there would be nobody to hide behind.

Because of our American education system, 99% of the people reading this will say that I am wrong, mean-spirited, and too hard-core to be realistic. And I say to them that they are wrong in their beliefs, and that if they subscribe to the altruism taught to them in college, and their public education system, they are simple leeches in a society that is struggling to stay afloat so long as the 1% continue to get up each morning and find a way to keep the 99% employed and paying taxes, so Obama and his band of looters can continue to create “government jobs.”

If I were sitting around that table I’d tell the engineering student to get a job and find a good engineer and mentor with that guy for about 10 years. A college professor can’t teach you much of anything after your first two years of college. And I’d tell the girl who wants to learn entrepreneurial development to quit school tomorrow and jump into her first idea. After all the richest and most powerful entrepreneurs in American history mostly dropped out of college or never went in the first place. CLICK HERE to see the very long list. The inflation of education is self-inflicted by the American approach of adopting socialism as the primary mechanism to educate our youth, and it will fail our society 100% of the time and will continue to be a drain our productivity so long as millions upon millions of students, teachers and politicians fail to recognize the error of their ways, and the ungainly evil of altruism.

If you are a student going to school, or are a student thinking of going to school, I suggest before you plop down $50K for an education just because people told you that you should—you should read one simple book; buy The Fountainhead published in 1943, and spend a few weeks reading it before you spend any more money on education. There is simply not a better book to answer the questions of this educational dilemma in the United States.

____________________________________________________________

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

While you wait for Tail of the Dragon, read my first book at Barnes and Nobel.com as they are now offering The Symposium of Justice at a discount which is the current lowest price available.

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com

How to Beat the Bilderberg Group: Become a Modern Superhero with the power of “NO”

At a recent meeting I attended a deep dark controversial topic came up among the mainstream attendees, that of the Bilderberg group and to what extent they desired to subvert the American Constitution. The answer in fact is that the Bilderberg group, who is about to have their 2012 meeting in America is a serious threat to world-wide liberty as they plan to eliminate the American Constitution in favor of a global agreement. But their conspiracy is but one force that is working against us all. The real threat is actually ourselves, because the Bilderberg group, the communists, the global socialists, the bleeding heart greenie weenies, and every other subversive organization in existence can only take from free people what we give them willingly.

Alex Jones did an interview where the topic of re-education camp plans by the American military have been leaked and are quite official. So to my readers here from the newspapers, the television stations, the mainstream radio commentators who are curious, but wish the world would just concentrate on last night’s sports scores, this is a clear and present danger in American culture and it has happened right under our noses. While the topic of the Bilderberg group is considered by these mainstream reporters to be fringe right-winged conspiracy theory, the real threat has actually been our “compliant” culture willing to please others before ourselves by saying “YES” to every proposal placed before us by groups like the Bilderberg. This human tendency has paved the way for the enemies of America to conceive that re-education camps are a feasible option for population control. The re-education camps that have been speculated about for years are the natural next step after their horrendous power grab called the NDAA. (CLICK HERE FOR MORE)

Yes dear reader, the cat is out of the back officially. It is true that members of our own government wish to send Americans to these camps to pave the way for the deals they have made with the Bilderberg group, and dozens of other global organizations who are all maneuvering themselves to become the first rulers of the world. That is the endgame to these treacherous plots and should surprise nobody. These plots are as old as the human race.

But these advancements against the American people are not coming from gunpoint; they come from our weaknesses for “peace” and our naiveté toward “trust.” They come from the same forces that will lie to your face to get a school levy passed by telling voters that all the money is for the “kids,” and not the huge labor unions who funnel the money they rape from the taxpayers back to political control of their socialist party of choice called the Democrats. The same game has been used to virtually destroy our freedoms since 9/11 with the invention of the government jobs program called the TSA where slop witted thugs in baby blue outfits have become the ultimate mall cops of authority gaining the ability to molest Americans all in the pursuit of “safety” over “freedom.” And the current President of the United States openly lies and manipulates all of us by attempting to blame congress for everything that has happened when it was in fact a Democrat controlled house in the first two years that gave the President everything he wanted and rammed down the throats of the American people vast tyrannies in quantities that drown the average American intellect with subjects beyond comprehension. All these tyrannies count on the good faith, and desire to appease a puppet master with compliance to succeed.

Yes, the Bilderberg group is meeting in the United States to plan a gradual takeover of the American population so they can put down the last bastion of freedom loving beings on planet earth with a quest to resume the methods of European global conquest displayed in the Dark Ages. Many of the Bilderberg attendances are simply rich philanthropists participating in altruism masking their own psychological inadequacies with various forms of collectivism. And they hope to erase the sins of their power mongering with an infantile view of collective salvation which they require society to subscribe to in order to be successful.

Luckily for all Americans the solution to our problems does not require us to take up arms against these enemies, because we already have the ultimate weapon to use against them, and they know it. We do not have to attack any agents of collective law with violence, or harass the members of these silly Bilderberg punks with threats of violence. We simply have to learn to say “NO” when a politician asks us for something.

The most powerful weapon of the modern age is to learn to say, “NO.” It’s that easy. Say “NO” to your local school levy where your government school is programming your child to global socialism. Say “NO” to your police and fire levies because they are represented by labor unions with deep ties to communism (progressivism), and it will be those public servants who will come to arrest you under the NDAA Act. But they can’t arrest you if they don’t have a job to begin with. Say “NO” to their budgets because you still have the power to do so. Say “NO” to communism in America by voting out the most radical activist to ever sit in the White House, President Obama. And if you don’t like the Republican alternative to say “NO” to him as well, say “NO” to party politics completely. Say “NO” to all further tax increases even to the so-called rich. Force the idiots of government to live within a budget and let them die on the vine from starvation. Say “NO” to air travel when you can and drive instead. Don’t put up with the tyrannical TSA and their intrusive searches. Let them be all dressed up with no place to go, or nobody to “feel up.” Say “NO” to government mandated insurance of ANY kind, especially health insurance. The worst weapon that can be inflicted upon the tyrant intent on American destruction comes not from the barrel of a gun, but from the simple word, “NO.”

Dear reader, you have nothing to fear from the Bilderberg punks if you could only learn to say, “NO.” It is that easy. As of 2012, you still have the power to end all these threats to your existence by saying “NO” when asked for your cooperation in ending global terrorism by surrendering your freedom. Because the threats are very real, and the groups wishing to commit these encroachments are quite sinister in their intentions. Eliminating just the Bilderberg group will not end the threat. They will simply form a new group of philanthropists and “intellectuals” to construct yet another plot to take over the world at our expense. But the way to beat them all is to learn to say “NO” and to become proud in your power to say it. Because that simple word has the power to destroy every enemy working against America with an efficiency more robust than an atomic bomb, the collateral damage from such a blast is negligible leaving only the enemies of freedom destroyed, and those who love freedom left to exist by the terms of “Truth, Justice, and the AMERICAN way,” because to me, there is no other way, but the “American.” To every other way of life and their offerings, I simply say, “NO.”

Become a modern superhero, by harnessing the power to say, “NO.”      

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

While you wait for Tail of the Dragon, read my first book at Barnes and Nobel.com as they are now offering The Symposium of Justice at a discount which is the current lowest price available.

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com

More Evil Coming from the NDAA: The band of thieves known as the Federal Government

I had the opportunity to listen to KrisAnne Hall speak recently about the implications of the recent signing of the NDAA law by President Obama which received bipartisan support—meaning most of the Federal government is guilty of a serious infringement of the U.S. Constitution.

KrisAnne was an attorney who was fired from her job for teaching Tea Party groups about the U.S. Constitution, which is apparently an unacceptable practice these days from the gate keepers of tyranny. The implication of such a firing is that the legal minds of our country are quite well aware of the scam they are perpetrating upon the American landscape, as many of their brethren run for elected office. The system is built by lawyers, exploited by politicians, and manipulated by would-be-tyrants intent to rule their own little sector of the world. But that is all known; especially to the crowd who turned out to listen to KrisAnne speak about the NDAA.

The NDAA is the most obvious power grab I have seen the Federal government attempt in my lifetime, and its implications are very far-reaching. To review, the NDAA gives the President of the United States complete power of interpretation over what constitutes a terrorist or a terrorist facilitator and allows for suspects to be detained indefinitely. And the most troubling aspect of the NDAA as if that weren’t bad enough is that the President can transfer a U.S. citizen outside of the United States to a foreign country, or military base where American courts have no jurisdiction. What this means is that if the President wants to, he or she could arrest any citizen in the United States under the NDAA Act and ship them to a Siberian prison, or even trade to North Korea to disappear forever from the face of the earth based exclusively on Presidential suspicions.

The intentions of course are short-sighted and focus on the current known terrorist network in the world. But like all laws, twenty years from now, some unknown president will use the NDAA Act to take complete control of the United States as a dictatorship, eliminating their political enemies at will without any checks and balance system of power. We’ve seen Presidential administrations do these kinds of things in the past even though it’s illegal and subversive to indulge in such activity. In fact, during the Clinton years many people associated with that administration that were known political enemies, or had become that way found themselves dead. There are many deaths of politicians that I can think of right off the top of my head, Sonny Bono is one of them, the Vince Foster “suicide” is another, that were deeply suspicious, and were in fact most likely political assassinations. It happens every day.

With the NDAA someone like President Obama now thinks he has the right to arrest his political enemies and get rid of them, which of course violates the entire concept of “checks and balances” we have in the United States, and it’s not at all paranoid to believe that such things are possible.

The trouble with the NDAA is that it’s just plain un-American. It is the kind of law we’d expect from a socialist country, or a heavy communist country, such as China, or Russia, but not in the United States. If there was any doubt that politicians in The United States are in bed with members of the United Nations to execute the implementation of Agenda 21 that doubt is gone, otherwise there would be no law in the United States that would allow the export of American citizens to a foreign country by the whim of a future President.

As predicated, only a handful of the American people are concerned about the NDAA Act, and those were the people showing up to hear KrisAnne Hall speak. The domestic enemies who wrote the NDAA Act could care less about this comparatively small group of people who are openly questioning what’s happening. They calculate that they should be easily be able to suppress such a small voice, as the rest of society has long forgotten about the law signed on New Years Eve just prior to 2012. Most of society is happy to take the word of the majority of politicians who voted in the tyrannical law completely trampling the 5th Amendment of the Bill of Rights, because the aim of many globalists are to eliminate The United States Constitution completely anyway.

But much to the dismay of those politicians who voted for the NDAA Act, and their deals they’ve made with global politics, there will not be a “consensus” on suppression. I know many people who will not go quietly into the night to be shipped off to Siberia, or a dirty Mexican prison south of the border just because a President doesn’t like us. So the NDAA Act and those who voted for it will be accountable when all hell breaks loose, because it will. Because they broke the law of The Constitution and they did it with malicious intent. They are wrong, and someone must pay for their insolence. And it won’t be targets of the NDAA Act. It will be those who authored the law in the first place, they are domestic enemies in the United States and must be treated as such.

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

While you wait for Tail of the Dragon, read my first book at Barnes and Nobel.com as they are now offering The Symposium of Justice at a discount which is the current lowest price available.

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com

The Life of Julia: How free are women after progressive policies?

Oh, how wonderful the Obama administration is, the ultimate parent mother government. The disgusting slide show shown as the campaign rhetoric of the new Obama presidential platform is a summary of why public education is a complete failure and why the women’s movement of progressive Victorian escape velocity from traditional values has very nearly destroyed our civilization after just 100 short years of nonsense.

Thankfully for voters all over the United States the true nature of the socialist Obama presidency is revealed for all to see with tremendous arrogance, and a lack of respect for American intelligence in the slide show presentation known as, “The Life of Julia.” Look for yourself:

http://www.barackobama.com/life-of-julia

 

The slide show featured on the Obama website features a young girl aged three getting a start in her life with the Head Start government program then traveling through her life as she gets Pell grants, free health insurance coverage, government loans, Medicare, then Social Security. In the Obama plan Julia dies sometime after age 65 and the whole process starts for the next generation. The premise is that Julia requires government help during her entire life, from the cradle to the grave.

The vision—or should I say lack of it—is disgustingly narrow and pathetically reminiscent of all the European socialist countries that have been licking the heels of America since the Industrial Revolution, and I am thankful that the Obama Administration showed openly this time that they are socialists with this disgusting assault against the American Woman.

Here is the real life of Julia as seen through the eyes of reality.

Obviously Obama and his band of looters are attempting to appeal to the women vote in the upcoming election. After all, this is not the Life of “John,” but of “Julia.” Men typically don’t look to daddy government to care for them, at least this is the implication of what the Obama administration states in this slide show. Watching this presentation by a sitting American president has really brought to question how far women have really come as independent suffragettes at the start of progressive politics.  What have women really accomplished in their so-called independence?

Julia as a young woman in the world of Obama is not raised by her parents. There is no reference to a mother, or a father. There is the implication that it is government who cares for the young Julia, and her parents are simply caretakers for her life. Yet all through Julia’s years she is always holding out her hand to government to get her through to the next phase.

I thought the women’s movement was all about breaking free of the grips of those “stinky,” “filthy,” “womanizing,” men who couldn’t keep their pants on, trapping thousands of women in a kind of prison while they slaved over a hot stove cooking for their monstrous husbands? At least that’s what the short-haired, bell-bottomed women of feminism have always said—that women deserved equal pay, equal treatment, so that they could be free of being slaves to men.

But what has that given to women? Weak minded men—loveless lives of loneliness, broken families with so many step parents that nobody even knows whose kids belong to whom. Those are the gifts of feminism, and of progressive politics. Women today are free of a man to run their lives, to oppress them into slavery as the head of their families. Instead, progressives like Obama have freed women of the chains of their families and traded in those for the shackles of a bigger, meaner force in her life–that of Big Daddy Government.

If women were truly free, would they need government to stand over them for protection, to enforce the rule of law destroying families in the process? Is a woman free who must look to Big Daddy Obama to care for them—because that’s what Obama is selling on his slide show—he’s literally saying that he will care for American women from cradle to grave with his governmental policies? All a woman has to do is elect him so he can steal from the tax payers and give to all those poor, helpless Julia’s in the world who can’t do a thing unless Big Daddy Government sweeps in to care for Julia’s life.

Yes Julia—who’s your daddy? Who’s the big man in your life? Are you free all you Julia’s reading this now? Can you care for yourselves or do you need Big Daddy Obama to equalize the world for your fragile sensibilities? Is this the freedom the feminists fought for, to break free of the chains of their alcoholic, abusive husbands and to attach themselves to the fingers of many such monsters as are typical in modern government?

And before anyone says that my comments here are “women hating” it wouldn’t be the first time, and it certainly won’t be the last.  (Click Here). But I did raise two daughters and I’ll tell you dear reader what I taught them, that if you look to anyone in your life to care for you, then you are a slave. That includes your parents, and it certainly means other family members, friends, neighbors but especially government. If you take money from those thieving losers, then you have signed away parts of your own soul to a life of servitude. To me, “The Life of Julia,” as proposed by President Obama’s vision of the future is slavery of a different kind—it is socialism put kindly and is a sharp march toward “RED” communism. It is the worst kind of social engineering experiment indulged in by any mass society, and it is destructive to the human soul. The life of Julia is one I would never recommend for my daughters, or my wife, mother, or anybody else. The life of Julia is a tyranny that is scandalous to the personal sovereignty of every human being that breathes, and should be rejected by all Americans, no matter what their sex or race.

But the Obama administration knows what magic tricks work behind the progressive push for feminism, a blind collectivism that unifies women everywhere to a feeling of inequality which is simply a hoax designed to get all women to jump away from the tyranny of their families into the tyranny of Big Daddy Government. In the end, the women are not free, just used for political purposes and tossed away to the careless indulgence of bureaucrats and their parental rolls of a New World Order where parents will become obsolete, and all citizens are but brothers and sisters to their guardians in government—those obese, comb-over politicians of corruption and name plates. That is the life of Julia. 

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com

Sex at Highland High School: What makes a good teacher?

Does anybody remember the dark days of the evil teacher union empires, when they organized in the halls of our schools and demanded more money for their whole 9 months of work? They’ve been kind of quiet lately, haven’t they? They’ve been pretty mellow for about 16 months now—ironically, about the same amount of time that I’ve been doing this blog—I wonder if there is any coincidence? ( LOL)

Well, you can pat yourself on the back for part of that. Finally tax payers are learning what type of scam has been pulled over their eyes for many years now by being told so much money was demanded for the teaching of our young, because we needed “quality” teachers in our classrooms. However, by the rash of scandals happening all over Cincinnati, most recently in Highlands High School in Northern Kentucky involving teachers having massive amounts of sex with the student population, it would seem the quality of our teachers are being recruited from Hooters and The Brass Ass strip clubs instead of Americas highest institutions of learning.

Yet during the above interview one must wonder who dropped mustache man Stuart Bassman on his head. His loose use of the word “compassion” is straight out of the progressive handbook of apologist behavior. Sorry Stuart, but the compassion is all used up buddy. I don’t give a rat’s ass whose hurting emotionally inside. They can hurt on their time, but when a teacher is in the classroom, they are “owned” by the community, and do not have a right to have sex with kids, no matter what their age.

For those out there with common sense, this is just one more example of what kind of quality we can see in the modern teaching profession. Make sure to send this article to all your friends and family so that when their local school asks for more money with a tax increase, they’ll know what their hard-earned money has bought them.

Oh, sorry teachers reading this—you think I’m being a big mean man. You wonder what I think a good teacher is, what I think would be worth the extraordinary amounts of money that we pay teachers. Well, I do have a teacher in mind who if our schools were filled with them, you’d hear no complaints by me.

Meet Miss Beadle. Now this is a teacher.

Instead, what we get are nymphomaniacs who can’t even wait to get home before having sex with young male students. Not my idea of a quality education.

Be sure to pass this on to someone who needs to learn what they are paying for in education.

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com

Richard Lugar Lost his Seat, and his Mind: That’s what happens when politicians “compromise”

Richard Lugar is upset that he lost his long time senate seat to Richard Mourdock, a position Lugar’s held since 1977. Lugar lost the primary election by more than 20 percentage points so it wasn’t even close. This has sent shock waves of fear through the political establishment of both parties leaving the White House to voice its concern that the GOP is taking an “extremist” turn in Indiana with the election of Mourdock.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/09/lugar-rival-credits-tea-party-with-victory/#ixzz1uNjPCf5K

 

Here’s what Lugar said after the election.

He and I share many positions, but his embrace of an unrelenting partisan mindset is irreconcilable with my philosophy of governance and my experience of what brings results for Hoosiers in the Senate. In effect, what he has promised in this campaign is reflexive votes for a rejectionist orthodoxy and rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the other party. His answer to the inevitable roadblocks he will encounter in Congress is merely to campaign for more Republicans who embrace the same partisan outlook. He has pledged his support to groups whose prime mission is to cleanse the Republican party of those who stray from orthodoxy as they see it.

Well, here’s how it is Richard Lugar and every other establishment politician who has made a career out of politics. Many people are just tired of “compromise.” That word has no place in American government any more. “Compromise” means a right answer has made concessions to a wrong answer to get some weakened idea that is corrupted by stolen value.

“Compromise” means that two sides did not fight it out to find the truth. Compromise means that two political parties decided how to divide up the loot stolen from American citizens in order to pad their own pockets, or political ideology. It is because of that idea of “compromise” that Richard Lugar fought against, is why he lost his seat. He was not fighting for what was right—his vision of right and wrong has been corrupted by too many years in Washington. He should have left the Senate in 1981 and let somebody else serve in his place. It is not the job of American citizens to elect a man into a Senate seat and to hold that position for 20 years giving the GOP a majority in voting, and to “compromise” with looters like Barack Obama, to keep the peace. It’s that type of mentality that has brought America so much trouble and caused our current 15 trillion-dollar budget deficit.

Speaking for myself, I have no desire to maintain the political order of the day, because it has been bad for America. It’s been good for looters and thieves in government who steal public money to build their palaces of worship to themselves, to create their immortality in more and more needless regulation—I don’t want anything to do with more of what’s wrong. If the political establishments who occupy a kind of European nobility in this country that they maintain with looted tax money want to call that “extremism,” then so be it. We have a president in the White House who was mentored by Bill Ayers and many other communist advocates, and are as extreme as the word can be properly defined. So I’ll wear the title proudly, because I want what’s right for my country and my state, not for some corrupt politician seeking “compromise” over what’s reasonably correct.

That is why you lost Richard Luger, and why many others will lose in the upcoming months. Prepare to be shocked. If Indiana does not vote for Richard Mourdock this upcoming fall, then the fault for what follows will be on the voters. But electing a politician into office who will simply compromise with various degrees of socialism to make everyone happy is not the solution of the future, and that kind of nonsense must end quickly. It’s good to see that conservatives like Mourdock no longer care if they are called “extremists” by a bunch of looting Democrats (socialists). Once they no longer care to be called names, then the real fight can begin, a fight that Richard Luger did not participate in, because his goal was to get re-elected to office, and maintain the peace—not to preserve the liberties and freedoms of our nation. His tendency to surrender these principles to the radicals of government over the last 20 years has made it so that liberty and freedom are now considered, “radical.” That’s why he lost his seat, deservedly so.

There is no “compromise,” CLICK HERE to find out why.

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com

 


 

Van Jones, One of Obama’s Socialist Friends: Green is the the New Red of Communism

Here is one of the many socialists who seek to undermine America. This is Van Jones at the Green Festival recently. The Green Festival is a cesspool of socialist sympathizers who seek to use climate science to spread communism all over the world. Listen for yourself.

Take note, prepare your minds, and make a friend aware and awake.

Pass it on………………..

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com
 

Take the Rich Hoffman Challenge: Individualism rules the world

I challenge you dear reader to give me one instance in the comments section of this posting to show me where in human history greatness was ever achieved under the mob rule of the collective. The answer of course I already know—never in human history has the mob ever proved to be the correct, most innovative solution. It has always been—and I mean always—that individuals drive an idea, a team, or a company to greatness. And once that individual is removed, the whole organization falls apart. Never does a rule by committee create something new. They can sometimes maintain greatness for a period of time before the quality the individual leaves behind gradually declines into oblivion, but they never create it.

The common mantra of our day however, particularly in sports is there is no “I” in team. Yet there is, because when it comes down to it, it is individuals who achieve the best and brightest statistics and drive their “teams” to victory through leadership. Sacrifice of individuality does not produce victory; it produces weak-minded, slush piles of worthlessness. Go ahead—I challenge you. Your silence I will take as a concession to my statement. I want all you collective minded utopians to prove me wrong, or attempt to do so. Go ahead—I’m waiting.

Public education is worthless because it teaches young people collectivism. Government is wrong because it behaves along the principles established in public education, of collectivism. And most companies fail when they adopt the “No ‘I’ in Team” mantra. They almost always overcompensate with faulty spreadsheets to keep their board of directors from digging too deeply while they fudge the numbers for 8 or 9 business quarters before eventually failing after the leadership of a strong personality leaves the company.

Collectivism as it is taught to our young American children is the most evil thing in existence. It is dooming entire generations to failure, by believing in the wrong moral principles. Our young and our old take these foolish notions into their adulthoods and they vote based on collectivism, they purchase goods based on collectivism, and they socialize based on collectivism. They worship based on collectivism. Most of the evil committed on planted earth is from collectivism.

You know you’ve committed this evil if you catch yourself saying “what would so and so think,” or “what do ‘they’ say is fashionable.” You are evil because what you are doing is hiding the solutions to problems by using the coverage of collective responsibility like a child uses blankets to hide under from the monsters concealed under their beds. The solution is not in the collective, but in individuals taking responsibility for their actions on the merits of their existence.

An excellent example of this collective mob rule is the Zimmerman case in Florida. Zimmerman is being tried in the court of public opinion not based on the rule of law by his peers, but by the democratic mob mentality of peer pressure. President Obama is not dealing with the economic tragedy of our age by dealing with reality, he is instead proposing more tax increases to slow the bleeding with an infusion of cash by inciting the mob of the collective against the rich, because obviously the rich are fewer in number than the masses of the mob. Obama is wrong, and his thoughts will lead to eventual destruction, just as the mob is wrong to publicly try Zimmerman without due process attempting to make the entire issue about race relations, to advance policies that benefit a collective group. On that same note, often evil politicians use women as a collective body to advance polling numbers in their favor by attempting to paint all women under the umbrella of public opinion through collectivism. This is done because advertisers have already conditioned society to understand that women are the primary decision makers of an economy, so women are targeted with various ads hoping to lure these demographic groups to their products. But on the downside, politicians like Obama and his gang of thugs do the same, pandering to women’s fears and weaknesses as a collective group hoping to win 50% of the vote of all Americans in the process. This is one of the reasons a majority party can win in our nation even if everything the party represents is fundamentally wrong, because decisions are made not on logic, but on emotional neurosis utilizing fully mob rule.

Most of the instances of bullying that go on in public schools are because this process of beating individuals into submission through group behavior is going on. Groups in public school are created socially, and the function of the school is not to teach our young how to be great innovators and out-of-the-box thinkers, it’s to find their group and to stick to it. Children are beaten into submission by their teachers, their classmates, and their parents into conforming to the will of the masses. A common aspect among the rich and successful is a tendency toward rebellion of compliance, displaying a tendency to break the unspoken rules of society. Public schools do not produce leaders of the pack. It simply produces members of the pack.

Companies are never run well by a committee of weak-minded fools. A board of directors never does a good job of advancing the strategic aims of anything—ever. Success always consists of strong individual personalities and the mob that licks at the heels of leadership carrying out the commands of the leadership by an individual. The ass kissers of the world do the work, but without the quality of thinking that comes from an individual who possesses leadership, the work is worthless. This is especially true of government, but can be seen in all its disgust wherever groups gather and the masses rule through democratic peer pressure.

The myth of the 99% is just that. Without leadership, they are just a mob of collectivists awaiting the determination of a leader to guide their lives. They are worthless without the 1% who take responsibility and lead all others. In America these days we breed these 99% types like cockroaches in a dark moist basement called public education. We drop these poor children off at day care before public education even begins at age 5 to begin the pounding of their young minds into the submission of mob rule. And by the time these young people are 15 to 16, they have given up. Their minds are no longer their own. They are at that time the 99% who will always in all phases of their lives be at the mercy of a leader to guide them about like little army men on a pretend battlefield. The worst of these collectivists are the idiots who go to college and attempt to join a fraternity hoping that their networking connections through those infantile organizations will land them with a good job so they can lick the heels of a leader all their lives, till their miserable lives ends in the grave of their choice. For these collectivists that’s the only choice they have left in their lives–where their burial plots will hold the empty carcass of their lives upon death. All other decisions in their lives are at the mercy of someone else.

Most leaders in the world of the human being have openly rejected this process of collectivism. Most people at the absolute top of an organization are raw individualist who do not care what people think of them, they do not worry their minds what is fashionable in Paris, or what is going on in New York. They do not worry about trends of popularity because it is they who set the rules. They are the trend setters for the masses, and without them, the collectivist will perish, 100% of the time.

So why do we embrace collectivism in America? Why do we endorse it as a “good” thing? Because it’s not, it’s pure evil and nothing less. Our institutions are breeding soulless human beings vacant of originality, vacant of courage, vacant of leadership and we are praising them for becoming part of the great evil goo of nothingness. We praise our children for surviving their hazing rituals in their college fraternities, we praise the women for voting with the girls doing exactly what advertisers told them to do, we praise entire sports teams for their victories, but within each article it is the work of an individual who almost always presides to carry the team over the edge of victory with leadership.

But why do we do these things?

The reason is that those who wish to rule, but lack the ability of leadership use the masses to compensate for their personal failures. This is how America got President Obama, who would amount to nothing if he did not rely on collectivism to carry him like an Egyptian pharaoh on the back of slaves across the Nile to tombs dedicated in his honor for the aimless appeasement of the gods. In Obama’s case it is the God of Mother Nature that he represents and millions of weak-minded collectivist built-in public education with our tax money carry him willingly hoping to get some of that “Obama Money” that is looted from the public, from the leaders of society who actually create jobs.

The evils of our current world can in almost every instance be traced back to collectivism to the principle of mob rule. Mob rule believes it can make something right due to their superior numbers, that they can deny a truth just in denying its existence through superior numbers in believing something. And such idiots will always have superior numbers, because there will always be more of them than the leaders of the world—the 1%. Mob rule, such as what is going on in modern politics is no different from the violence of the Vikings, or the Mongols, the Nazi, the French under Napoleon, the Greek under Alexander, the Romans under Marcus Aurelius, or the Americans under Franklin Roosevelt. Society has always, and will always be driven by the strong individuals of creative thought. Collectivism will never create justice, equality, or any primal form of a utopia. That is why in America, we should reject collectivism completely in every instance. Collective mob rule is the gateway to our own destruction and is of no good to anybody, even those who think they are the nobility of our culture. The so-called nobility are simply those who licked the most boots of a real leaders—the head honchos, the leaders of the pack, the one percenters, the visionaries who find they need people to carry out their visions, and as they look down, they see these boot licking followers offering to do anything to touch their grace of leadership.

Go ahead, give me one instance where I am wrong—–I dare you. There are certain rules to nature, the sun is hot, snow is cold, and it is always individuals who drive society. Once that is understood, America can realize that they could eliminate hundreds of thousands of government jobs, and save a hell of a lot of tax money and have a better society, not a weaker one. All it takes is the power of individualism, and the courage to use it.

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com
 

Lakota Wastes $100,000 on One Employee: A good article from Denise Wilson

Once again Denise Wilson of  The Pulse Journal shows that she is not eating out of the hand of the Lakota School System.  In my experience with Denise she has always been fair.  She’s been fair with me, and I think she has been fair with the school system.  Most recently though, she did a story on the outrageous sums of money that was spent on the Laura Kursman case which I’ve covered here extensively.  For my primary article on Laura’s case CLICK HERE. 

But for the sake of credit to Denise Wilson’s article, here it is in case you have not yet seen it.  Just think how much tax money that was wasted on absolutely nothing–and the school did it for the same reason they do everything–it’s not their money, so it’s easy to spend.  And when they need more, they just twist the arm of the tax payers for more money.  Taxpayers of Lakota–look how the school system spends your money!

Meanwhile, Lakota is beginning their new “community engagement process”  CLICK HERE FOR MY TAKE.  Click the link below to see the report from Denise.

 http://www.pulsejournal.com/news/local-news/lakota-launches-community-engagement-process–1370142.html

The next levy campaign has officially began right on schedule, but at least you know dear reader–how and what Lakota spends its money on–and it isn’t kids.  It’s payoffs and hush money.  Just ask Laura Kursman. 

 

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com
 

The Kroger Survey: What do you think of Rich Hoffman?

Over the course of past school levy fights at Lakota I have been called, “mentally unstable,” a “wife beater,”(no basis in reality) a “psycho” and a “jackwagon” (whatever that is) – and a narcissist, among other things. These names came my way well before the release of my famous Enquirer article where I fired back at my political enemies by calling them “latte sipping prostitutes” which erupted into a glorified scandal all over Cincinnati. These names have been said about me for over two years now, and are now the source of my disapproval in funding my local school with even more taxes. When I first spoke out against the proposed levy in 2009-2010 I used moderate language that was quite respectful and found that I was called horrible names in online forums even then, which became so bad The Pulse Journal shut down their forum site. You can see some of these comments about me that took place recently on a site called Yappi where my name started coming up after the announcement of the Yes to Lakota Kids initiative. They have even went to the extent to describe me as another Timothy McVeigh which of course is the terrorist bomber who was convicted of blowing up the Oklahoma Federal Building. You can read all about it at the link below.

http://www.yappi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=236573&page=8&highlight=lakota+eas

 

At that link one posting jumped out at me as being particularly sensational. Apparently a person obviously close to the author went into the Kroger store in Liberty Twp and randomly asked people what they thought of me as they entered. The results of their “highly scientific” survey are below along with most of the original posting, which can be seen with all the other comments at the Yappi link. To my experience these comments represent very well the type of people who generally support school levies. Check it out:

What I now find funny, after opening up the Cincinnati Enquirer this morning is that the “No Lakota” group has dissociated itself from Hoffmann. Here is a bit more about that piece of news.

What is Mr. Hoffmann going to do now? It’s obvious that his level of intelligence is not up to a high standard. He also really seems to be mentally unbalanced. I fully believe that, as the mouthpiece for “No Lakota”, Mr. Hoffmann has been a paid spokesperson/lobbyist for the group. With the amount of time that he put into his efforts to defeat the levy coupled with the writing of his blog, he would seem to have time for little else – at least not a real job. I hope he doesn’t show up to any job interviews wearing his “wife beater” shirt. Poor little Rich is going to have to get a real job now. No more drawing a salary as a lobbyist.

I agree that there needs to be something done to address school funding issues. The problem of school funding affects all districts in Ohio. The larger districts are particularly affected. What I’ve never been able to understand about the “No Lakota” group is why some of their energy, as well as Mr. Hoffmann’s, weren’t channeled toward lobbying to make changes at the state level. The “No Lakota” group was founded by real estate people (Mark Sennet and others) and it would seem to me that they would realize the importance of a strong school system and what type of positive impacts it has on property values. Meanwhile, those that voted against the levy based on the advice of a “psycho” spokesperson probably didn’t realize that the value of their home and property will probably take a bigger hit than the additional tax dollars that they would be paying. If these real estate people were serious about having a positive impact on the real estate values in West Chester and Liberty Townships they would be trying to implement change at the state level.

In closing, I am going to list the results of an experiment that someone did at a Kroger store in Liberty Township. I thought this was interesting and it will give you a good idea of what a lot of people think about Mr. Hoffmann. You’ve all heard of word association games. Random people entering Kroger were asked to say the first thing that came to their mind when they heard the name of “Rich Hoffmann.” Many did not know who he was and some did not care to participate. A pretty good number of people did contribute. Here are some of the responses:

– Little man
– Straw man
– Genius (this guy was incoherent and wore a “wife beater” shirt similar to what Hoffmann wears on his videos)
– He’s a dolt
– Destructive to our community
– He has Napoleon’s Complex
– A little man with a little brain
– A smart guy (this guy also looked like a productive member of society. He appeared to be drunk at 1:00 in the afternoon on a Saturday)
– I’d love to go mano-a-mano with him (I echo these sentiments – with or without the bullwhip!)
– What an idiot
– An ugly dude with an ugly agenda
– He really misogynic. I’m surprised the guy is married. I feel sorry for his wife
– Another guy wearing a “Hoffmann wife beater shirt” that didn’t comment but gave a thumbs-up
– He’s a really piece of work. The guy is a psycho
– The guy is a tool and a jackwagon

There were a lot more similar comments.

It is because of people like that, that I am now against public education, and against the levy system. The more I have learned the less I desire to support it with the taxes I already pay, let alone more. For me it started with a desire to just control costs. But as time went on and I read these kinds of comments about me I have decided to find every way possible to withdrawal any financial support from their organizations. I don’t want one dollar of my tax money to go to any employee or any supporters of a school system who writes and believes these types of things about me—who will go to a Kroger on a Saturday afternoon and attempt to smear my name.

Events like that survey did get back to me in the late days of January and early February and my response was well noted and appropriate. If it’s good for them, it’s good for me. But to call me a known terrorists and right-winged extremist is quite a stretch, which was said about me later on that particular thread. To attempt to paint me as an extremist who will bomb buildings and lash out at the Federal government with violence is precisely how the progressive party of public schools and liberal politics work when they find they can’t argue an issue because the facts are not on their side. They are the reasons for my desire to cut off funding to such organizations completely.

The acts I preach are not of violence against some entity like the government for public school, unless attacked first. Instead I seek to make tax payers aware that they hold all the cards and that they fund all this nonsense. For most people they fund their public schools not because they want to take care of tomorrow’s youth, or desire to be esteemed members of their communities. They do it so they don’t get ridiculed by political terrorism such as a person who goes to Kroger on a Saturday to ask people what they think of their political enemies.

Nobody on their side of the political aisle can explain to me why I am compelled to help them cover the cost of their child’s education. I don’t want to help financially a family who thinks that I’m a terrorist, and I certainly don’t want to help their child get an education. Why should I help anybody unless I want to? It is not my task to figure out when I wake up each morning how I am going to make people like me, and I certainly don’t jump through hoops to see that they do. I spend zero time each day thinking about what anyone else thinks of me. If people like the things I say, they tune in and read. If they don’t I won’t lose an ounce of sleep.

But I do not wish to support even with a few cents a day a person or a group of people who think so poorly of me. If they feel that way, that is their decision—their freedom of choice. But I am not compelled to give them the value of my earning in any way. I do not spend my afternoons slandering my political enemies at a Kroger store or any place else. I write my thoughts and communicate on the radio using the First Amendment to do what it’s supposed to do, and that is create dialogue to root out an idea.

To people who wish to extort through coercion and other means of pressure money from the public pockets so that they can carry on their silly government racket–my acts are as severe to them as blowing up a federal building–relative to their mentality. Because they are extremists who live off public money and they need my participation into their collectivism to have power, my desire to be removed from their looting scheme is a threat to their very existence. I do not wish to be in their collectivist society. I do not want their friendships, their approval, or their endorsements. I require absolutely nothing from them, and for that they call me a terrorist and multiple other derogatory terms. Because of my stance on living, and social participation is the greatest threat to their existence—because I do not need them–they think of me as the most sinister force they can imagine. And that makes me very proud.

It is not “popular” or “fashionable” to declare ones independence from the masses. Just because their opinion out-numbers my own does not make them right. It is possible to have 1 million or 1 billion people be completely wrong and only one person be right. A majority opinion does not mandate truth, or justice. It is simply mob rule and I’m not interested in that type of lifestyle, or teaching the modern children of America to live under those terms. America is a free country designed to protect the freedoms of individuals. Individuals will be drawn to their own friends who suit their interests and this happens naturally, without government interference. People are attracted to each other through aligned values. The advocates of public education such as the author of the above posting seek to remove value from society so that all people with empty heads will be drawn together by default in a grand scheme of equality—equally helpless, foolish, and conniving. I’m opposed to their approach—and will not support it. My lack of support does not require the action of a single other person. However, due to the shared values of many people who feel as I do–but are just not vocal about it–the school levies will continue to be defeated. I will not support more state funding so long as labor unions rule our education institutions. I will also not support a per pupil cost amount that is not driven downward with competition from schools who can educate better, and cheaper. And if the schools do manage to get a tax increase I expect to take back that looted value with declining property taxes through reassessment. These words from me to my political enemies are equivalent to the acts of Timothy McVeigh. On my end I do not seek to go out and attack any of them physically. My acts of terror are to deny them of money. If I take away their money, then what becomes of them? They revert to the colossal failures they truly are socially, parentally, and individually since they can no longer hide behind the money they’ve looted from society. That is when we can see who the bad guys really are, when they can no longer hide, and must show themselves for their true nature—which is quite disgusting. This is why I now stand against public education completely, is because these types of personalities need to be removed from any public debate before such an idea will ever be worthwhile to another generation of children. And right now they have equal value with me in the public debate only because they do it with looted money. Take that money away and those of true value can be seen for their true worth—which is greatly lacking.

This is what people are saying about my new book–Tail of the Dragon

“Just finished the book and am sweating profusely. Wow, what a ride !!!  Fasten your seat belts for one of the most thrilling rides ever in print.“

Check out more by CLICKING HERE!

Rich Hoffman
https://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/ten-rules-to-live-by/
http://twitter.com/#!/overmanwarrior
www.overmanwarrior.com