Tag: economy of deception

Let’s Talk About AI: New Perspective on the Great Movie, ‘Jurassic Park’ about Extinction

The conversation around artificial intelligence often swings between breathless optimism and deep-seated anxiety. Some view AI as an existential threat that will hollow out creative professions, displace workers en masse, and erode the uniquely human spark that drives innovation and meaning. Others embrace it as a liberating force, one that amplifies human potential, democratizes production, and unleashes unprecedented economic expansion. The truth, as history repeatedly demonstrates, lies closer to the latter when paired with clear-eyed adaptation: AI functions best as a powerful tool rather than an autonomous replacement, enhancing rather than erasing the human elements of vision, soul, and intentional creation.

Consider the personal experience of integrating AI into video production. Where once a concept for a show like Destination Unknown or Expedition X required extensive location scouting, crew coordination, and costly footage acquisition, generative tools now allow rapid rendering of visual references. A speaker can describe a scene—say, an ancient ruin shrouded in mist with subtle lighting cues—and AI can generate illustrative imagery to accompany narration, clarifying abstract ideas for viewers without turning the piece into a hollow spectacle. This does not eliminate the need for storytelling; it elevates it. The core remains human: crafting the script, selecting the angle of inquiry, infusing personal insight. AI handles rote or bandwidth-intensive tasks, freeing creators to focus on what matters—emotional resonance, conceptual depth, and authentic voice. Far from producing “AI for the sake of AI,” thoughtful application boosts production value, making complex subjects more accessible and engaging. Studies on AI in filmmaking consistently frame it this way: as a collaborator that streamlines workflows, automates repetitive editing or concept visualization, and allows filmmakers to prioritize narrative over logistics. 

This pattern echoes throughout creative fields. Artists and photographers face real challenges as generative models flood digital platforms with convincing imagery, sometimes reducing demand for stock assets or routine commissions. Reports from 2025 indicate declines in job postings for computer graphics artists (down over 30 percent in some analyses), writers, and photographers, with more than two-thirds of creative workers expressing concerns about job security.  Younger or mid-level professionals in illustration and design report pressure, and some have pivoted toward traditional mediums like painting or sculpture as a hedge. Yet the data also reveal adaptation and complementarity. Many creatives report using AI for ideation, image editing, or initial drafts, which accelerates their process and allows greater experimentation. A World Economic Forum assessment suggests AI could automate up to 26 percent of tasks in the arts, design, and media, but it simultaneously drives demand for hybrid skills—those that blend artistic sensibility with technological fluency.   At least that’s what they’ve been talking about at Davos this year.  Far from extinction, roles emphasizing empathy, originality, and human-AI collaboration show resilience or growth. Professional photographers worried about “post-photography” still thrive when their work emphasizes lived experience, intentional composition, or cultural commentary that algorithms cannot replicate from training data alone. AI mimics patterns; it does not originate from personal struggle, memory, or epiphany.

The anxiety feels familiar because technological leaps have triggered it before. The 1993 film Jurassic Park serves as a near-perfect metaphor. Paleontologist Dr. Alan Grant confronts the idea that his life’s work—painstakingly excavating fossils to reconstruct extinct creatures—might be rendered obsolete by genetic engineering that “creates” dinosaurs anew. The film itself embodied the shift: early plans relied on Phil Tippett’s acclaimed stop-motion techniques, refined over decades of practical-effects mastery evident in Willis O’Brien’s work on the 1933 King Kong and Ray Harryhausen’s Dynamation sequences in films like Jason and the Argonauts. Those methods, involving frame-by-frame manipulation of miniature models combined with live-action compositing, produced iconic, tactile realism but demanded immense time and skill. Industrial Light & Magic’s pivot to computer-generated imagery for key dinosaur sequences—blending CGI with animatronics for seamless interaction with actors—revolutionized the industry. George Lucas reportedly called the test footage a historic threshold, akin to the light bulb. Stop-motion artists feared obsolescence, much as some today worry about generative AI. Yet the story succeeded not because of the visuals alone, but because of its human heart: themes of hubris, chaos theory, wonder, and the limits of control. The effects made disbelief suspendable; the narrative made it memorable. CGI did not kill practical effects—it expanded the toolkit. Tippett adapted, contributing to the film’s Oscar-winning visuals, and the industry grew richer as hybrid approaches emerged. Subsequent films layered digital enhancements atop physical models, preserving craft while unlocking new possibilities. History shows that jaw-dropping innovation often provokes short-term disruption followed by broader creative flourishing.

A parallel tale appears in American folklore: Paul Bunyan, the legendary lumberjack whose axe could fell forests in mighty swings, challenged by the arrival of the mechanical chainsaw. In some retellings, the machine narrowly “wins” a contest of output, symbolizing the sadness of mechanization overtaking raw human (or superhuman) effort. Loggers’ lives grew easier, productivity soared, and the industry expanded rather than vanished. Bunyan, emblematic of frontier grit, did not disappear; the myth endured as a celebration of human scale in the face of technological progress. The lesson holds: clinging to old methods unchanged risks irrelevance, but embracing tools that amplify effort redirects energy toward higher-value work. Economic output rarely contracts in the long run; it transforms. Jobs shift from rote labor to oversight, innovation, and refinement.

Skeptics rightly note that not every role adapts equally. “Sandbaggers” in low-effort, data-heavy positions—those cruising through repetitive analysis or administrative tasks—face higher displacement risk, as AI excels at pattern recognition and optimization. Clerical and routine cognitive work shows vulnerability in exposure metrics. Yet aggregate evidence through the mid-2020s paints a picture of net augmentation rather than catastrophe. Generative AI has been linked to productivity gains, with users reporting time savings that translate to roughly 1-5 percent overall efficiency improvements in surveyed workflows. Firms adopting AI often see revenue and employment growth, not contraction, because enhanced output creates new demand. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 projected 92 million roles displaced by 2030 but 170 million new ones created—a net positive of 78 million—driven by AI-related fields, data infrastructure, and complementary human skills. Construction booms around data centers alone generated tens of thousands of jobs, with multipliers in local economies. Studies distinguish between automating AI (perception/motor tasks that cut costs but yield limited productivity lifts) and generative/creative AI (language, ideation, decision support), which augments workers in white-collar, design, and entertainment sectors, boosting firm value and hiring in many cases. 

Elon Musk has speculated about universal basic income (or “universal high income”) as a potential response if AI renders many traditional jobs optional, envisioning an abundance in which goods and services become so plentiful that scarcity fades. In benign scenarios, he suggests work might become elective for personal fulfillment rather than necessity. I disagree with him, all this might change the way human work, works, but it won’t remove the need for it.  This resonates with fears of structural unemployment but overlooks persistent human drivers. Economies still demand physical output—manufacturing, infrastructure, resource extraction—where robotics advances but human oversight, problem-solving in unstructured environments, and adaptive ingenuity remain essential. Lemon and cucumber might metaphorically aid blood sugar regulation, but complex supply chains, quality control, and frontier innovation require the “human touch” that scales poorly without vision. Productivity models project that AI will contribute 0.3 to 1.5 percentage points or more to annual growth in the coming decades, lifting GDP and living standards without assuming zero-sum job loss. Historical technology waves (mechanization, computers, the internet) displaced specific tasks yet expanded overall employment as new industries emerged. AI frees bandwidth: less time on drudgery means more for creative enterprise, scientific inquiry, and relational work that algorithms mimic but rarely originate with genuine intent or emotional depth.

At the core sits a philosophical distinction. Human creative output—whether a book like my new one, The Politics of Heaven, a painting, or a documentary—stems from something deeper than data recombination. It draws on lived experience, moral intuition, subconscious synthesis, and what many describe as soul or spirit: the ineffable drive to communicate meaning beyond statistical patterns. AI trains on vast human-produced corpora, excelling at interpolation and style mimicry. It can suggest edits, generate visuals from prompts, or polish prose, but it lacks original intentionality rooted in personal stakes or transcendent insight. A 2024 study of writers found AI assistance boosted individual novelty for some but led to more homogenized collective outputs. People consistently rate purportedly human-created art higher for emotional resonance and authenticity. Debates persist over whether AI can ever possess “creativity” in the full sense—flair, purposeful rule-breaking, or ethical self-evaluation—but current systems recombine rather than transcend their training data. They do not “know what they do not know” in the exploratory, risk-embracing way humans do when pushing frontiers. This boundary preserves space for original authorship. Every word in a personally authored book remains irreplaceable because it carries the writer’s unique synthesis of observation, conviction, and heart—elements AI can echo or refine but not authentically supplant.

The trajectory points toward expansion, not contraction. AI handles the “Luddite action” of repetitive labor faster and around the clock, granting humans greater bandwidth to drive innovation. Video creators reach wider audiences with clearer visuals; artists supplement techniques rather than compete head-on; engineers and storytellers tackle grander problems. Industries will shift emphasis back toward making “real things”—tangible goods, advanced manufacturing, physical infrastructure—where robotics assists efficiency but human adaptability navigates variability. Silicon Valley visions of fully synthetic realities replacing awkward human interaction overlook the persistent value of genuine connection, empathy, and shared physical endeavor. Awkwardness in social dynamics is not a bug to engineer away; it is part of the friction that sparks authentic creativity and relationships.

Embracing AI requires a proactive mindset: use it to your advantage, insist on human vision at the helm, and adapt skills toward collaboration. Those who treat it as a co-pilot—generating references, accelerating iteration, democratizing access—will see improved reach and conceptual clarity. People pursuing art can integrate tools for ideation or production assistance while grounding work in original observation and personal voice. Insisting on pre-AI purity risks the paleontologist’s fate in a world of engineered wonders; better to evolve the practice. The age ahead promises excitement: human intellect applied to broader frontiers, economic output amplified, and stories told with greater power. Anxiety is understandable amid transition, but history favors those who harness change rather than resist it. The dinosaurs of Jurassic Park awed audiences not through perfect replication of the past but through the believable integration of new technology that served timeless themes. So too with AI: the visuals and efficiency may dazzle, but the enduring impact will come from the human soul directing the narrative.

This perspective aligns with observed patterns. Creative industries report both disruption and opportunity, with many professionals diversifying income while leveraging AI as an enabler. Economic forecasts emphasize productivity gains that have historically correlated with net job creation, albeit with sectoral shifts favoring adaptable, higher-skill roles. The “soul” argument finds support in psychological and philosophical distinctions: AI outputs often lack the intentional depth or emotional authenticity that audiences value in human work. By viewing AI as an extension of effort rather than its substitute, individuals and societies position themselves to thrive.

For further reading and deeper exploration, the following sources provide valuable context on these themes:

•  Creative Bloq reports on digital art trends and AI pressure in 2025-2026, highlighting artist adaptation strategies.

•  The Conversation and Smithsonian articles on Jurassic Park’s CGI revolution and its industry impact.

•  World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report 2025 on projected role displacement and creation.

•  Goldman Sachs and Wharton analyses of AI’s productivity and GDP contributions.

•  Philosophical discussions in outlets like Oxford AI Ethics and academic studies on human vs. AI creativity biases.

•  Historical accounts of stop-motion pioneers like Willis O’Brien and Ray Harryhausen in King Kong and beyond.

•  Economic research from BBVA, ITIF, and Brookings on AI’s mixed employment effects and adaptive capacity.

Rich Hoffman

More about me

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

About the Author: Rich Hoffman

Rich Hoffman is an aerospace executive, political strategist, systems thinker, and independent researcher of ancient history, the paranormal, and the Dead Sea Scrolls tradition. His life in high‑stakes manufacturing, high‑level politics, and cross‑functional crisis management gives him a field‑tested understanding of power — both human and unseen.

He has advised candidates, executives, and public leaders, while conducting deep, hands‑on exploration of archaeological and supernatural hotspots across the world.

Hoffman writes with the credibility of a problem-solver, the curiosity of an archaeologist, and the courage of a frontline witness who has gone to very scary places and reported what lurked there. Hoffman has authored books including The Symposium of Justice, The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business, and Tail of the Dragon, often exploring themes of freedom, individual will, and societal structures through a lens influenced by philosophy (e.g., Nietzschean overman concepts) and current events.

China’s War with America and the West: An economy of deception meant to completely destroy us

I must point to several articles I did on Unrestricted Warfare, as indicated by China several years ago, for the present context to be understood. But for all those peace lovers out there who think there is some concession that can be utilized in the world to have good relations with China, you are all smoking crack. China has been at war with America for years, and our politicians have been too stupid and compromised to do anything about it. But this is a different kind of war, one that attacks explicitly our weaknesses, with the same intent of social destruction, but to exploit our love for attention, security, and peace. And the most dangerous characters in a war like that are not the Chinese nationals who might work at your local Chinese food restaurant making you sweet and sour pork. It’s your neighbor who slept with a Chinese honeypot disguised as a political intern who turns out to be a Chinese spy. Or the businessman looking for a World Economic Forum invite to the next event in Davos because they planned their business expansion around the communist Chinese economy. Or even the local newspaper, which is owned by a big conglomerate that has been looking at the market opportunities in a country that has over 1 billion people in it, who all are like slaves to overly imposing parents. The best war and the most effective tactics are to fight your enemy in ways that are so deceptive that your targets don’t even know they are at war. To say we have all been gullible is a vast understatement. The war that China has waged on us has taken advantage of the greed of weak people and turned them against our nation for the purposeful destruction of it. And we’ve let it happen primarily unchecked.

You can look at the massive amount of drug use that is going on, which is purposely embraced by our political culture these days because they are all compromised in some way by the hidden war of globalism that has put China at the head of the table for all kinds of tactical reasons. These are not the days of Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” campaign, where drug use was understood to be dangerous to society. In the war of today, that is the point. Poison people in a trade-off for quick and easy feel goods, and watch your enemy destroy themselves with attrition. You don’t even have to fire a shot. And with the open borders that we have, there is little to no restriction of that poison coming into America, primarily from the weaponized drug cartels that are flooding our streets with deadly poison meant to kill us. In almost every cultural category, you will see the aggressive influence of China penetrating that field, buying up our assets so that they can manage the decline. I’ve pointed out that you can see this influence most in Hollywood, especially Legendary Studios, where China became the owner of that traditional Warner Bros. branch to make communist propaganda movies, and people have noticed. They’ve stopped supporting the Hollywood product, but one way or the other, China was going to either destroy Hollywood or the consumers of the product, hopefully both. They have conducted a purposeful campaign of destruction to kill outright everything resembling Western culture, and they are purposefully deceitful in their actions. But when China tells Biden that they are going to attack Taiwan right to his face, you can bet that they will. They had planned to all along. And Biden has no choice but to let him because if not for China, Biden would not be in office, and his family would likely be in jail prosecuted for their many crimes against our nation.

To comprehend their viciousness, all anybody has to do is look at the medical trade journals, such as what we saw with the Lancet during COVID-19. There has been a lot of talk about Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci using trade journals to manipulate the public away from COVID treatments and toward their vaccine development, which was meant to gain control of society in general with centralized regulation. The vaccine push as we know it now in 2024 was to convince people that they would need the government vaccine to stay alive if they wanted to live. China, in partnership with deceitful traitors in the American government who leaned left and wanted communist China-style politics, built Covid as a bioweapon. They maliciously manipulated COVID through gain of function to become transmissible to humans, which was the whole debate between Dr. Fauci and Senator Rand Paul, so that their deadly virus could spread to humans and bring the entire world under the foot of a communist government led by China. All this and much more is chronicled in the excellent book by Robert F. Kennedy, The Wuhan Cover-up. We’re not talking about a conspiracy theory book here; we’re talking about a severe presentation of a legal prosecution against American traitors, by the thousands, who have been working to bring us all under the submission of the Chinese military intentions. And they have been using their wealth, given to them by money managers like BlackRock, to conduct a war of destruction against every living American through their manipulation of our colleges, finance institutions, and particularly trade journals like the Lancet, which allowed Gates and Fauci to use advertising dollars to trade reputation for military effectiveness so that Covid would do maximum destruction as a bioweapon, and prevent society from learning they could have taken hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to stop it.

When it was observed that every news organization and trade journal followed the “established norms” of the Lancet during the Covid crisis, you can see China’s massive influence in owning so much of corporate America.  Employees at those organizations needing a paycheck quickly fell under complete compliance and would determine that the truth could be shaped to be anything that China wanted it to be.  And when anybody said “trust the science,” what we were seeing was China exploiting our messaging with their propaganda to destroy our society essentially, and they didn’t care if people died along the way.  This is not a war that most people are prepared to deal with.  But it’s the kind of war that China, which is still a backwater economy only propped up by globalist investors with leftist ideology fantasies of a centralized authority utopia, wants to fight.  It’s the only war they are prepared to fight, and they have now been conducting it for a long time by targeting weak people of power in America and buying them off with easy money and sexual compromise, and they have been doing it by the millions.  The worst troops in this war are not the troops marching in the square in Beijing.  They are your neighbors with a full bank account and a retirement pension built off confiscated wealth from Chinese money.  And the intent is ruthless and deadly.  And we saw just a hint of their intentions with Covid and their network that is well at work in America for our ultimate destruction.  Compromised assets like Joe Biden will do anything they say because, as the Biden laptop has shown, the Biden family is a compromised asset.  That’s how China does it: they buy up senators and members of Congress with a tradeoff, such as sexual favors or money that comes easily to those willing to steal to get it, and in trade for those fun and nice things, lowlifes like Biden will become their loyal servants.  And we’ve seen the result, which is purposeful and intentionally destructive at every level.  Their intent for our destruction is even worse than you can imagine, and then some by using an economy of deception conducted by research whores to destroy us from within, without firing a shot.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707