Don’t forget that we are dealing with a massive criminal syndicate that has taken over the levers of government power and is using that power to stay in control. And those looking for the easy money that comes with corruption are facilitating the enterprise, which is undoubtedly the case with the warnings The New York Times has been saying about election results. Of course, they plan to cheat again when they say that we should not go to bed expecting a winner on election night. It might look like Trump won, but as they did in 2020, the plan is to keep counting mail-in ballots, especially from overseas, until they reach the number to push Kamala over the top. That’s what they did with Biden. But this time, it will be much harder for them because so many eyes are on this election, and they won’t have COVID-19 as a cover for deviating from traditional election counting procedures. But just as a baseline, we are a highly technical country; modern tools allow us to know and do things better than ever before. However, suppose we can’t get a result on election night. We are witnessing incompetence driven by a need for theft and a whole bunch of problems that an established order has in controlling mass society with election fraud. The New York Times is well aware of this. Never forget that the company that owns The New York Times went about in the 1990s buying up a lot of media companies, particularly KFOR Channel 4 in Oklahoma City, which was investigating the evidence of a third terrorist after the Oklahoma City Bombing, the investigation was essentially shut down after the new owners showed no interest in pursuing the story and a massive desire to contain the evidence from the public. The same thing happened in Cincinnati with The Cincinnati Enquirer when Gannett bought them, the same newspaper corporation that runs USA Today. Independent media has been gobbled up by giant corporate conglomerates that are highly invested in global socialism, and they use the media to control populations on a mass scale. Not to report the news to them but to control what they think.
So don’t expect that same machine to tell you the truth about what’s going on in the 2024 election. I told everyone you’d see every evil effort during this election season. And I’ve also said emphatically that Democrats can’t win if they don’t cheat. And we are at that point in the election cycle where cheating occurs at the suppression polling level. Suddenly, Kamala Harris, hiding from the world without doing much public engagement, is surging in the polls, creating the illusion that she is poised to win, frustrating Trump supporters with a cold reality that we might end up with a communist takeover of America. Even Rasmussen has shown a much closer race between Trump and Harris than anybody thought was possible. Just remember, the machine does not want to give up power, and it is doing everything it can to suppress the Trump vote, so don’t take anything for granted. Do not stay home on this one; get out and vote for Trump. This is the chance of a lifetime to undo the machine that is visible when we see what BlackRock has done to the world. There is a lot of money for this criminal class of people to rob us by the means they have been utilizing. And that criminal class of global Marxists wants Kamala in the White House to continue that criminal enterprise.
It’s not that we can’t trust the polling. The method is suitable for capturing trends; not everything is a conspiracy. However, many of the polling companies want a particular outcome because they are part of the media machine, so they sample in the direction of the outcome they desire. But saying that, Rasmussen is supporting Trump, so if they wanted to show him winning, they would sample more Republicans than Democrats, like many of the others are doing, of likely voters and report the results with the tip of the scales toward their desired outcome, to essentially make reality motivate action at the voting booth. But as things are, even Rasmussen shows things moving in Kamala’s direction away from Trump, so what’s going on? That’s why I say engagement is a far better definition for success than just a statistical sampling of likely voters who happen to pick up the phone from a pollster. Polling how it has been done has significant limitations regarding the new trends from social media. Traditional media that has been bought up by the globalist companies looking for international Marxism have not yet adopted the modes of new media and independent media that are driving modern culture, so their visibility into the support behind Trump is very alarming to them. And traditional polling does not do a good job of seeing these trends because we are far from conventional politics here. But they even say that Trump has the lead in the battleground states and can win the election with Pennsylvania alone. I think Trump will do well in Wisconsin, Virginia, Michigan, and other Democrat strongholds. But he doesn’t need to win them all. It comes down to Pennsylvania this time, and Trump is poised well there because that was the location of the first assassination attempt against him, and looming in the background is a lot of anger toward the established order, thereby the first-time voters and freshly converted Republicans who are very energized to vote for Trump.
If state polling or even national polling is showing a tie or Kamala Harris is pulling ahead by a few points, it comes down to the errors in sampling. The number that will matter most will be the engagement factor, which is why Democrats are so concerned about mail-in ballots, especially from overseas. If the election is close, it will be hard for them to steal the results, as they did in 2020. But in truth, if the polling shows Harris close or winning, it is because polling only picks up a likely voter, not one who is voting for the first time because of Trump. Their phone number likely won’t show up on a polling list to call. Nor will they pick up if they don’t know who is calling them. Traditional polling can give you an insight into trends, but it can’t pick up engagement, which is why polling wasn’t able to see how well Trump would do in 2016 or 2020, where Trump consistently did better than polling showed. That’s because polling, even at Rasmussen, can’t pick up engagement, the people who are motivated to vote because the candidate is one they feel great excitement for. But what polling can do is take the wind off of that excitement and hope through suppression results to keep people home believing that voting is pointless. That is the kind of game we are dealing with here, and we see it every year when The New York Times publishes their probability of victory at the beginning of election night, which points in Trump’s direction by the end of the night. But it doesn’t start that way. These international organizations control elections in countries through suppression polling, giving the illusion that something is more popular than it is so that social mechanisms will provide them with the results they seek. However, Trump functions outside that control, which is undoubtedly the case in 2024. So keep that in mind when you see polling results, and don’t let them steer you away from voter engagement because that’s the point. And don’t believe what you hear. This won’t be easy at any level. Get ready for a fight, because the enemy is dug in, and corrupt beyond belief.
Rich Hoffman
Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707
The Overmanwarrior 