Yes, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham Should Be Impeached: Gun rights are the keys to all successful economies

And she should be impeached, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico.  I have been everywhere in New Mexico, and I can say with certainty most of the people there are not big supporters of her.  Her support primarily comes from the colleges around Albuquerque, where Marxism has infected the population in a population center that has given the illusion of a blue state mentality.  But that is not the case, and the governor has shown her cards in many ways by jumping offsides on a conservative hard count.  She never had the power to create an executive order limiting the Second Amendment in any way over what she says is excessive gun violence involving children.  The progressive trend to exploit children for the advancement of attacks on the American Constitution is not new, and it’s certainly what is going on with this latest attack on the Second Amendment.  Then, for that same anti-family Democrat party to advance talks of killing kids with abortion almost in the same sentences is perplexing and irrational.  But it’s not a surprise, given the state of their party politics.  The pressure to stop populism forces governors like Grisham to blink and give away their intentions when they would be better off holding their cards.  Democrats can’t afford to because their window on power is closing in on them.  Now, because of her outright attack on gun rights in New Mexico, many Republicans are calling for her impeachment, as her executive order limiting concealed carry where public places are concerned was such an overreach and abuse of power that Republicans are perfectly justified in attacking the governor for such outrageous actions.  I said it the moment she signed the order: Governor Grisham did not have the authority to act against gun rights.  Constitutional laws are “absolute.”  They are not subject to government interpretation or any progressive editing, which she had in mind when she signed her ridiculous executive order.

I think it’s great that we are finally having honest conversations about Constitutional law.  I have wanted to have these intelligent conversations for the last thirty years, and it’s only now, or really, since COVID came along, and all these big-time Democrats with Marxism clearly on their minds have shown the public what I have been warning about all this time.  People used to say, “No, they aren’t that crazy, (Democrats).  They aren’t Marxists, communists, and socialists.”  Well, yes they are, and they always have been.  They know that Marxism will never work in America so long as they can’t use physical force to impose compliance with the government, so they, of course, desire to destroy the American Constitution.  They aren’t looking to live within the law; they intend to break it, which Grisham’s Executive Order did.  Just as Biden’s Executive Order involving vaccine mandates clearly violated the law.  The American Constitution limits the powers of government; it doesn’t grant them.  Unlike Communist China, where they criticize all these limits on government power, the goal of Marxism as a philosophy is to have central state control over everything, and the people serve the state.  Grisham did as many progressives (Marxists) have been trying to do with their acquired power, abusing it toward the aims of global communism.  But they can’t hope to do that unless they can get people to fear authority, and that won’t happen if people are personally armed with gun rights.

The point of the Second Amendment initially, and to this day, is to limit the power of tyrants like Governor Grisham, who want to use government control to impose itself on the rights of individuals.  Government power is limited because of the tendency of authority figures to abuse their power throughout history.  With the long-established plans of Marxism to take over the world, and especially embedding itself into American culture under many disguises, they see where political sentiment is heading with MAGA and the support for President Trump, especially in New Mexico, so they are making their moves while they still can, while they still have power.  But in haste, governors like Grisham have shown ordinary people the game being played, not just speculated about.  And the reaction to her executive order is much more rambunctious than such actions have been in the past.  The government does not have the right to do what it did with Covid, and that is to suspend Constitutions.  That is why the scandal of Covid was so audacious and the political motivations so obvious, even if it’s hard for people to admit to.  COVID was about giving the government the power it wanted in the world for global communism.  It was not about health management. Otherwise, the government would have made emergency recommendations for Ivermectin upon the Covid outbreak.  Instead, they supported censorship.  They wanted casualties because it helped them advance their cause toward Marxism.  Just as Governor Grisham tried to exploit the death of children to take away gun rights and strike a blow at Constitutional limits to government power, these are scary examples of a government power grab. That is why we have a Constitution as we do, with the Second Amendment and the First to set up boundaries to check that power before it gets out of control.  An American society without guns will be a Marxist one, which is their goal, and when that power is abused, the natural reaction should be impeachment from office for the attempt.  There must be consequences. 

When people like Grisham say, “America is the only place in the world with gun laws that make gun ownership common.  Nobody else has them.”  Well, I’ve been all over the world, and I can tell you there is no place like America.  And why should there be?  It is no accident that the freest country on earth has the best economy.  And the areas that have the most centralized authority have the worst economies.  China is another Marxist con game where American investment has been tricked into believing that communism was the future, so they have moved in that direction, propping up the communist country into what history will quickly recognize as a dramatic failure.  Then, of course, why are guns needed? Well, wherever a good economy produces something of value, other people always want to take it, including the government.  So, that is why there is a Bill of Rights that protects gun rights.  And there is no negotiation on gun rights, none at all.  Gun rights are the key if you want an excellent economy, as most people worldwide do.  Where there is value, there must be a means to protect the value created.  Governor Grisham, like most from her Democrat Party, is attempting to take over the American economy with centralized planning, which will significantly restrict personal freedom and the amount of money such a country can generate regarding GDP.  So, people have a right to be upset about it, and more than ever, people are making the direct correlation between gun rights, safety, and economic viability.  The more guns and personal freedom, the more money a country can make.  And the more capital, the better the society and the options for the people living there.  Gun rights are the key to a productive and safe society.  Any intrusion on that deserves removal from government office, which Governor Grisham, at the very least, deserves for her vast examples of government overreach. 

Rich Hoffman

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.