Dear reader, if you are still in denial that Barack Obama is a planted—created personality fashioned by the enemies of America you can stop your skepticism at this time. The new film by Dinesh D’Souza produced by the great Gerald Molen called 2016 will bring to light just how serious and to what extent Obama was placed into our culture to dismantle it. But you don’t have to wait to see D’Souza’s new film. The evidence is all around us. But first, check out a preview and short talk by that director at CPAC.
It is well-known that climate science is the altruistic fantasy of the progressive movement which is why Al Gore was the primary advocate and President Obama is now carrying the torch. To believe in climate science to the effect that the human race is so audacious as to actually overcome the effects of the sun and induce planetary warming with the pathetically small levels of greenhouse gas that our society emits, is preposterous. Yet progressive advocates who desire global socialism seek to use climate science to destroy all of society in an Aztec like sacrificial worship of the divine God called Mother Nature. But those mind-bending, catatonic, progressives are in error and in case you missed the memo, 49 former NASA scientist and astronauts sent a letter to the current NASA Administrator Charles Bolden admonishing the agency for its recent role in advocating that man-made C02 is a major cause of climate change. You can read that letter to Charles and see who signed the letter below. (CLICK THE LINK TO VIEW)
This letter went to the same Charles Bolden who was a figure of great controversy a few years ago. In 2010 Charles gave an interview where he revealed that President Obama told Bolden that his primary objective for NASA was not to send more astronauts to the moon, or even to bring about the next generation of the Space Shuttle. It was to reach out to the Muslim world and make them feel good about themselves.
Bolden in that clip obviously eats out of the hand of President Obama and is either so concerned that NASA will receive more budget cuts from Obama’s administration, or Bolden has been put in place to advance the global socialism Obama intends. It is clear that President Obama is not interested in NASA’s former greatness in being the kind of organization that invented Velcro and put men on the moon, but desires the rest of the world to become more proficient in their space programs with the United States out-of-the-way.
Many think that President Obama is a Muslim, although he has said that he’s not. It seems odd however that Obama would put so much emphasis on Muslims. He is not concerned with Buddhists, Hindus, Mormons, Scientologists, or even Christians—but Muslims. The employees who built the reputation of NASA have had to watch President Obama dismantle all their hard work with trivial nonsense and a pattern of behavior that anyone can see clearly.
Obama has purposely put a stop to NASA and done what the Soviet Union during the Cold War only fantasized about—ended the National Aeronautical Space Administration dominance in travel outside the globe in a progressive quest to honor Mother Nature. You see global warming freaks who wish to worship their incestuous Mother Nature desire to make their mother happy by ensuring nobody can ever leave Mother’s home. To make their mother happy, they are willing to cut out the legs of anyone who might escape Mother’s home. In this case it is NASA who promises to take mankind off planet earth, but progressives don’t want to see that happen, because they require captives chained to earth to believe their rhetoric and give them power.
If manufacturing and other industry were to move into space then who would listen to the preachings of the global warming freaks? To what God would the globalists sacrifice to? The progressive globalists would see that the control of their Mother Nature would be diminished as humans colonized the moon, and Mars, and built huge space stations to live in orbiting the planet. Mother Nature would have to look up at mankind as they leave her loving arms and she might be very sad.
The global warming freaks are like those suck-ass siblings who never leave the side of their mothers, and hope to bend the entire family around their illness in sacrificial service to their corrupt mothers. In this case it is Barack Obama who speaks on behalf of the global greenie weenies. His dedication to the Muslim religion is a convenient excuse to deter the efforts of NASA into productive executions of their energy. And then forcing NASA to buy into the global warming conspiracy by threatening to cut even more funding to the agency from the Obama Administration serves both objectives. Global warming advocates get respected NASA scientists to endorse their sorcery, while Obama pretends he’s making reasonable budget cuts. But in essence the action on behalf of the government is the threat of a thug bullying someone to force them to act against their reasonable thinking.
But not all NASA personnel is willing to play along, and that is the nature of their letter to Charles Bolden. It is commendable that those men and women named in the letter refuting the science of Global Warming as used by the progressive machine of Barack Obama and Charles Bolden were willing to stick up for themselves when it has been obvious that they have been coerced and bullied into action that was not in their best interest.
As we brace ourselves for D’Souza’s new film 2016 the evidence of Obama’s treachery is not in some far away conspiracy theory—it is happening right in front of us all. It is noticeable in many small ways. But it’s easy to see it in the big things too. Barack Obama is a climate science voodoo subscriber that desires to make Mother Nature proud of her children by not straying too far from home and cleaving to her breasts for milk and sustenance. The greenie weenies wish to make mother proud and chastise all those who wish to grow away from her grace.
In reality those global altruists are as sophisticated as the ancient Aztecs and their obsession with human sacrifice in a belief that the still beating human hearts ripped from a slain victim will bring water and food to their people. The modern equivalent is Barack Obama, Al Gore and other progressives who deem themselves the priests of a global mass sacrifice. They would see NASA destroyed and every American driving a Smart Car designed for children—because that’s how they see us all—as their children. That is, until a group of NASA scientists decided to stand up for themselves and the agency they helped to build—and told Bolden and his boss Obama—to go to hell.
The key to living a full life and solving the answers to all of societies current problems are in the philosophy of Objectivism. CLICK BELOW TO BEGIN YOUR NEW EDUCTION
Come one—come all, the Lakota Education Association (LEA) is having their election for President, Vice President and Secretary. They are meeting late in the evening after all their work is complete for the day at the extreme hour of 4:30 PM on Tuesday April 17th 2012. The vote for these positions gains the new president the ability to extort money from the public for future union contracts and allows them to speak to the media about how much the local children need union labor.
The future LEA President must make sure that every service offered to the community is held hostage while the members enjoy top salaries of over 63K per year and summers off. The president must be ready also to argue that any layoffs needed will be from the new teachers just hired while the old expensive ones cruise to early retirements while school buses sit idle, sports fees remain at $550 per sport, and electives are cut down to those of a third world country. The President of the LEA must not develop a guilty conscious, but must be willing to see the whole community surrounding the school system fail without yielding even a 5% reduction in wages and benefits. After all, the LEA President is not there to protect the students or their families, but the employees of the LEA.
The President of the LEA must be ready and willing to walk off the job with a strike like presidents of the past did such as in 2008. The squeaky wheel gets the grease and this is how public unions have managed to gain an average of 30% higher wages for their members over the private sector by showing a willingness to extort every dime available from the taxpayers for the benefit of their employees.
The future President of the LEA must forget that their position has no real power or influence, only in their ability to steal from the taxpayers, since all the members of the LEA are completely at the mercy of tax revenue. The LEA President is required to make the public believe that by giving the union money that the community will benefit in some way. The ideal LEA Presidential candidates should have past experience in carnival games, or working at casinos as dealers—positions that require manipulation of the public into spending their money and getting nothing back in return. This would give the future LEA President a great advantage in handling public affairs while serving the selfish needs of the union members.
It is very important that the LEA Presidents, and Vice Presidents be very well versed in The Delphi Technique and understand Saul Alinsky’s handbook Rules for Radicals. Knowledge in building a consensus is paramount to being president of a parasitic labor union, because the public must believe that the employees actually care about the public and listen to their suggestions. Through The Delphi Technique the LEA President will listen to advice from the community, but will make the community forget what those ideas are by the end of the engagement. The LEA President must be skilled in imposing their will on the community and making the community believe they played a part in arriving at those decisions. Slight-of-hand is very important and having a basic understanding of magic tricks would be very helpful.
It is important that the LEA President understand that the future of many industries is at stake if they fail to extort vast sums of money from the public. If the public stops giving tax money to the LEA union think what might happen to all the hair and nail salons in the area? If the LEA members do not continue to make more and more money, who will be able to afford going to those businesses? The same consideration must be given to the travel and tourism industry? If not for teachers being off all summer and having large disposable incomes, how many cruise ships will go out of business? How many airlines will have to close their hubs because teachers stopped traveling from the months of June through August? The future LEA President has a responsibility to not just the members of their union, but also all the businesses that depend on the services provided to the LEA members extraordinarily high compensation.
But more than anything, the LEA President must keep the union together, because it is union dues that keep the union strong. It’s the brothers and sisters in the OEA who need all the support they can get. The OEA must continue to fund the campaign of Democratic politicians so that the OEA and NEA can continue to shape the government legislature into a tyrannical entity that is destined to destroy the traditional values of America and embrace the progressive era of the United Nations.
In short the future LEA President must be the most audacious type of low-life, guiltless, parasitic, a destroyer of thinking, a con artist, they must be the epitome of the modern mystic of muscle—a thug willing to strong arm anyone who stands in their way for the good of the many—their brothers and sisters of the LEA. After all, the goal of the LEA President is to make themselves forget, as well as all their members that the intention of the labor union movement is to corrupt America with communism. The labor movement’s primary aim has been to separate individual rights from their property rights, because without the latter, the former is not possible. The goal of the communists behind the labor movement was to replace individual rights with “human rights.” The modern intellectuals of government education understand to reject the premise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and replace those with social justice, and equality for all so that the worst and least motivated of society can make slaves of their betters, the men and women of production. By executing this strategy it is the job of the future President of the LEA to stop war and spread peace by taking away all ambition from the world and making everyone the same by handling these tasks within the district of the Lakota School District as thousands upon thousands do the same across all of America to the drum beat of the Department of Education.
April 17th is coming quick, and this election is one of the most important for the LEA union to date. The future of progressive politics is at stake and control must be regained over a rebellious group of tax payers that has emerged in the Lakota School District to resist the might of the LEA and the power to rob, loot and pillage the wealth of West Chester and Liberty Twp. These rebels must be suppressed by the new LEA President and strength must be returned to the labor union movement before it’s too late.
The key to living this full life and solving the answers to all of societies current problems are in the philosophy of Objectivism. CLICK BELOW TO BEGIN YOUR NEW EDUCTION
Warning–some of this material is very abstract, but I include it because abstract understanding is needed to comprehend the depth of deception involved in the 9/11 Conspiracy. I would highly suggest watching every video below in great detail even if their immediate meanings cannot be realized at first impression. I received a note from a good friend and frequent reader here at Overmanwarrior’s Wisdom about my thoughts of the many rumors swirling around the whole 9/11 issue, which falls into the realm of conspiracy theory. I try not to speculate on things that do not have observable facts, but in the case of the 9/11 tragedy, there are many trends that have emerged that conveniently support the kind of world many fear is becoming a global-wide totalitarian government and correct context is needed to understand. The length of that context would require some back story which took time to build at this site so proper explanations could be provided as to my thinking on the matter. For ease of your mind dear reader I provide four documentaries today for you to study intensely. It is because of documentaries like these and blog sites like this one that the federal government wants to control the internet, because they don’t want the “masses” to have access to these stories. The government has worked very hard for half a century to create a “compliant” society and they thought they had this 9/11 situation in the bag by making it a conspiracy theory by way of study and placing all those who question the facts of 9/11 under the derogatory name of “truther.” But as we’ve seen recently, even the White House is openly playing the conspiracy game by releasing a fake birth certificate under pressure from Donald Trump so that they could attempt to paint Trump as a “birther,” and eliminate him as a presidential threat. However, the document the White House produced was in fact a fake, and for reasons only they can answer, continue to hide the truth of the President’s birth with shadow games instead of frankness—most likely to conceal their real intentions that are much more sinister.
Most people are not as manipulative as the characters involved in the stories described here today, and they don’t want to believe that these things are possible. This is by design of course; as most of us were trained as children in the public education system and it was under this system that “name calling” first shaped our thoughts. In public education peer groups are established to divide up our population into voting blocs that can be easily controlled, and this too is by design. Public education is not about preparation for college academics, or learning to read, write, or study history. It’s about learning which peer group one belongs to. One learns by coercion between peer groups—name calling, forcible conflict, etc, so that under an animalistic pecking order mentality, the human mind finds its place in the chain of command of social group behavior.
Many of the players in public education who simply hold a job do not understand that this was always the goal of public education, and they too, do not want to believe such things—but the Department of Education established under Jimmy Carter in 1979 and experienced its first years under Ronald Reagan made it very clear what the role of public education was on American society. Mass control of peer groups was one of the objectives. Listen to the second in command at the Department of Education under Reagan to hear these things for yourself. (CLICK HERE)
One of my favorite filmmakers, David Lynch has put his name to the films both above and below about 9/11 truth. I enjoy Lynch’s films for all the reasons I love Finnegan’s Wake by James Joyce, it’s because Lynch looks behind the scenes at the motivating factors behind the human mind. He did this with the Twin Peaks films to great effect. I personally think Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the scariest movie I have ever seen in my life. It is my kind of horror film and requires a certain development in the mind to understand. I showed this movie to my children at ages 9 and 10 years old so that they would understand how to see things in society by reading the codes of behavior patterns. That film is also why Chris Isaak is one of my favorite musical performers. You can see one of my favorite scenes at the 4:30 second mark below where Chris Isaak, David Lynch and Kiefer Sutherland get a message. David Lynch, the director, is the one who delivers the message. The translation of that message follows in the next scene. It is one of the great puzzle works in film that few people understand but is quite remarkable. Everything in the movie means something, just like in real life so I will place some of my favorite moments of this great film throughout this post to entice further review.
Lynch is also the director of two other movies I love, Wild at Heart and Blue Velvet. Lynch deals with the dirt under the grass in his films, and it requires a clear understanding of an intellectual aptitude to grasp. Unfortunately for many of us, that aptitude is robed from society during their public education years—and it’s done on purpose. Thus, my desire to see public education replaced in favor of a more competitive model not run by a government controlled monopoly and the Department of Education.
If David Lynch is involved in a project I tend to give it attention, and his thoughts about 9/11 mirror my own. So let’s take a dark journey down the rabbit hole together dear reader and study the dirt below the grass involving the tragedy of 9/11. Like most things in the human world there are layers of truth and layers of deceit. Few people in the process are privy to all the layers so that they can have reliable deniability, which is how good people unknowingly pave the way for evil. The architects of this deceit protect their mechanisms by the built-in characteristics of derogatory name calling, so to keep the human herd in check and under control.
I have a good example of this process that I personally went through just a few weeks ago, where I called a group of school levy supporters here at Overmanwarrior’s Wisdom “latté sipping prostitutes” which created a personal media firestorm against me as my political opponents cut up my comments and assembled them in a way to attempt to convince the city of Cincinnati that I was a “woman hater.” So let me explain how the process worked on the microcosm so we can understand how it works at the macrocosm. The school superintendent at Lakota views me as her number one obstacle to obtaining more taxes and bailing out the school from their excessively high union contracts. So between her and the new vice president of our school board they went through all my writing here to find something they could twist around in some way to excite their base. (CLICK HERE FOR THE BACKSTORY) Once they found something they thought they could work with, the VP put it on her Facebook edited in a way to anger her political tag-alongs. Within a few days I began receiving threatening letters and promises that I was going down because I was a woman-hater and they were going to run me out of their community. The progressively educated superintendent and VP knew that women are a bloc voting group and have been trained to behave similarly at the ballot box. If stirred up in manipulative ways women voters can be steered to act as a collective. This is why President Obama is attempting to use Planned Parenthood to win over women voters. Women voters in politics are viewed similarly as the black vote, and the Latino vote. They aren’t respected as individuals, but as a group collective. So the superintendent assumed that if she could get the women of the community against me by twisting my comments around on me, then I would lose their votes in the next election. So the politics of our local school assumes that women will all vote together in spite of the facts if a common enemy to their social welfare can be identified. By attempting to make me into that enemy, the superintendent hedged her bets that I would be removed from the political debate of the next tax increase.
With 9/11 the same derogatory methods are conjured up to steer people away from giving any credence to conspiracy theories that fall outside of the official commission report released on the matter. The public is supposed to blindly accept that the government was able to admit its own failure in allowing terrorists to train in Florida and to get on airplanes hijacking them to run into the World Trade Center to destroy the symbols of the American economy. And we are supposed to believe that a religious extremist living in some desert mountains with a porn addiction came up with the elaborate plan all on-his-own, and that the same man was able to evade United States punishment for over a decade thereafter while Google Earth was photographing every inch of the planet for casual surveillance. (Just imagine what type of surveillance the CIA has.) And it wasn’t like bin Laden was found in the mountains of the Himalayas or somewhere in the back country of Siberia, he was found in Pakistan, where he was rumored to be all along. We are also supposed to believe that once he was killed, he was dumped quickly at sea without a lot of media attention to honor his religion, which most people accepted without question.
So is it so hard to believe that members of this Shadow Party manipulated the events of 9/11 to their advantage? It isn’t to me. I believe that radical fundamentalists who hated America did train in Florida to end their lives by running commercial planes into the World Trade Center. But I also believe they had little birds whispering in their ears all along. I do not believe President Bush had his hand in the conspiracy, and I doubt any one member of the CIA or FBI did either. I believe there were a lot of games being played behind the scenes to study the terrorist behavior of these radical cells, and I believe that some of the games within the games were where the evil originated. I don’t believe those terrorists on those planes acted alone, but it was the whispers from the Shadow Party that fed money to both political parties who is at fault, and nobody points the finger at them, because society is in denial of the Shadow Party’s very existence—how can you blame something that doesn’t exist? You must first come to terms with that dire fact before you can place the blame for a tragedy upon their necks.
It is obvious by how government expanded after 9/11 that there was a mind behind the tragedy ready to leap. The plan was already in the works and the puppet presidents of Bush and Obama simply needed to maintain the figurehead role of signing bills as their advisors instructed them of what to do. This culminated in perhaps the most evil piece of legislation ever passed through our government, the NDAA Act signed into law on New Year’s Eve, 2011 and being announced the morning of New Years Day 2012 as America prepared to watch the last of its big college football games for the year. The overwhelming support by most federal politicians and the double-talk by President Obama convinced me that much of what was shown in the movies above is 95% real. I think maybe 5% is unproven speculation.
So you know that you have been attacked, not just by some enemy from across the ocean, but by people who you employ as a tax payer. You are their boss, yet you do nothing about it. And to keep you from learning more, they are working very hard to shut down your freedom to the internet so you can’t read articles like this one, and watch movies like the ones shown here.
The goal of an aggressor, just like my situation described at the beginning of this article is to cast an aspersion toward a threat and force that threat to react in a predictable manner. Once a manipulator understands the basics of human reaction the aggressor can always control a threat by forcing them to reveal their defense. In the case of 9/11 threats are isolated by the term “truther.” If the members of the Shadow Party were not concerned about these theories, they would not be looking to shut down the speculation by controlling internet content and other avenues of conspiracy theory. It was Cass Sunstein who recently proposed that conspiracy theories be removed from public speech altogether, that coming from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs under President Obama. Without question Cass and his kind view such wild speculation as being destructive to his goals in government. But what Cass and his kind don’t understand is that it may well be that the people who pay his salary with tax dollars may not want the kind of goals he has for government. We don’t want to be misled with silly tokens of information and driven like cattle into a pin of governments design. And that is what has happened with 9/11.
Yes, there is more to the story. I’d go so far to say that there is a lot more to the story, and much of that story is buried deep under the grass. But if you develop the ability to think, and to function outside of the controlled responses established in public education and free your mind to all possibilities, not just the ones given to you by those who desire to be your princes and kings, then the real truth is within grasp—and the truth about 9/11 is that airplanes ran into the World Trade Center and killed a lot of people, wrecked our economy, and terrorized our people into giving up their freedoms in the name of safety—which was the goal of our enemies. But the truth that has not been told is that all the enemies of that action did not perish in the crash, or were not captured in Pakistan and dumped into the sea quickly to be removed from public debate. No, the other enemies who number in the thousands are still hidden in the grass and they still plot the complete destruction of the United States of America in favor of a one world government with open borders from one nation to the next. And the political rule of that world government will be progressive in the mode of Socialist International. The United States is under attack from foreign and domestic enemies because we are the only free country on earth, and we are in the way of this world dictatorship. And the attack of 9/11 was designed to bring America to its knees within two decades, and we are well on our way to complete destruction now. No, the enemies did not perish but still reside in the grass hidden from the eyes of reality. They hide in plain sight because our minds have been trained not to see them, and this is how they do their menace.
9/11 was a tragedy, but it’s not nearly as catastrophic as losing the last free country on earth as a result of our sadness. Just like with a school levy tax increases, or any political maneuver, the bullies of the world seek to steal from you something that is yours in personal freedom by flooding your mind with sadness and fear to provoke you to act as they intend you to. And that is what 9/11 was all about and why it continues to do its work as the American consciousness is not able to grapple with the magnitude of constitutional infractions that followed in the years thereafter and continue to escalate under our own funding through taxation. The belief that people could not be so bad and sinister is proving the menace to our nation correct—that people refuse to see what is right in front of their face because the facts are just too difficult to comprehend. Unfortunately, freedom is not fit for such cumbersome minds, only tyranny and eternal slavery as those who surrender logic to the aggressors of terror will soon discover.
David Lynch, the director of Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, my favorite horror film of all time, is a suitable link to this story. His appearance in Invisible Empire is rational if you take into account his construction of the story Twin Peaks. That particular film is essentially the fictional story of the murder of Laura Palmer, a tortured young woman who is haunted by characters in her life driven by inner demons. In the last video clip showed above, it is in this scene that Laura has realized that the man who has been raping her since she was a little girl is not the wild man “BOB” who she thought hid behind her dresser in her bedroom. Her actual rapist has turned out to be her father, Leland. So in that particular scene Laura’s mind had just been shattered when she is forced to acknowledge that the character Bob was an invention of her own imagination, because she couldn’t deal with the trauma that her molester was in fact her father.
Leland knows that his daughter has discovered this and fears that she might reveal the nature of their relationship to the outside world where Leland is a respected member of the Twin Peaks community. Leland has managed to keep his daughter quiet all these years of night-time rapes by scaring her with displays of power. Leland attempts to put Laura back into that fearful state by commanding her to wash her hands before she eats, in an obvious attempt to gain control of her mind. The tragedy of Twin Peaks is that Laura can no longer stay in a state of ignorance because she has learned too much. So her father kills Laura and dumps her body into a river which is the cause of the FBI investigation in the film. The blue rose shown in the first clip signifies that the case has supernatural implications.
Like Leland in the film Twin Peaks who is raping his daughter night after night and seeks to keep it a secret by torturing her mind with incredible abuse, the government has harassed 9/11 truthers for years, and it is in their action of harassment that the governments guilt is revealed. All one has to do to see it is to look at all the pieces and admit to themselves that a trusted loved one is in fact the villain of their lives. And many Americans can’t see who torments them because they can’t bring to their minds the crushing reality that their trusted officials aren’t so trustworthy, the experience is life shattering—just as it was for the fictional Laura Palmer. Laura couldn’t admit that her father was raping her, and most Americans can’t admit the same of their government. You cannot understand the nature of 9/11 if you just look at the facts that you are presented with in the fashion the aggressors present. You have to look at the entire picture and the symbols behind the symbols to understand the true meaning of things, because that is how our enemies operate.
But remember, they are still our employees and the reason they do this all in secret is because they don’t want their boss—the American people—to find out. All this secrecy means that they do recognize that if their boss finds out they’ll be in big trouble, so it is not they who hold the cards of power, all the government holds is the ability to invoke fear to keep their secret quiet. So as people say to me—you can’t say that about the government—I say, why not? They are not my rulers. I don’t owe them anything, and if they have made deals with Islamic radicals and attempted to destroy the American economy, it is they who are the bad guys, not me. I have no explanations to make to anybody. It is they who have the blood on their hands and who have committed extraordinary crimes and attempted to hide the murders with further harassment. That is why eventual confrontation is imminent, not because people like me asked for it. All I’ve done is work hard and pay my taxes to a government I expected to work on my behalf. But instead this government has used my labor, and my property to steal my value for aims I do not support and sought to undermine my country on my back. It is they who have the explaining to do, not me—and certainly not any “birthers,” “truthers,” or “latté sipping prostitute accusers.” People have a right to know the truth and if there are factions who expect evil to be paved on the backs of the good, those factions have a hard reality coming their way very soon. Harassment and fear are not acceptable methods for concealing the truth. It is a wicked game that has been played on the American people, but the game is far from over, and we have not yet lost–only come to realize that we are playing against cheaters who will do anything to win.
Oh–you want more proof? You think I’m kidding you? You think all this is a conspiracy, because the knowledge is not convenient? Then read what’s at the link below and you’ll see how it was all set up in 1958 to create the world we are finding ourselves dealing with today. I’ve made it easy for you. All you have to do is look for yourself.
On purpose I have stayed away from commentary on the Trayvon Martin case where the young man was shot and killed in Sanford, Florida by George Zimmerman because I do not see the circumstances to be extraordinarily unusual from the dozens of other shootings that also occurred around that same time. The progressive knee-jerk of all shootings is to take away guns so the gangs, thugs and young people celebrating the “gangsta” mentality can kill each other with baseball bats and knives. The trouble with the progressive platform is that they helped created that “gang” culture with their policies of welfare and racial segregation for use in bloc voting. So they have helped create the environment that young Trayvon was just a participant. Young people mimic the culture that has been provided to them by pop culture, and these days pop culture heavily shaped by progressive politics says to wear your pants down around your knees, talk with heavy slang, and act like a “pimp daddy,” selling hoes on Washington D.C.’s K Street. I know hundreds of kids white and black that fit this description completely today. Its part of their culture and that culture is shaped by progressive politics.
(For a glance into this culture I’d invite you to check out the “Pimps and Hoes Society” and their United Kingdom party. http://www.pimpsandhoessociety.org.uk/ This is a direct result of progressive politics. And you wonder why kids are so confused.)
On the other hand I know the area of Sanford very well, and a gated community is that way for a reason. People value their properties, and they don’t want to walk outside and see kids cutting through their yards, or driving down the street playing loud music at crazy hours of the night. Property ownership is one of the cornerstones of our nation, and it should be respected. However, since progressive politics is just a thinly disguised attempt at socialism, private property is frowned upon. Private property is to be surrendered in a communist society, which is why progressive taxation on property is so aggressive. The progressive attempt is to encourage young people like Trayvon to not strive to have a house in a gated community, but to disrespect those who do, so all the gates of the world will come down, value for personal property will be eradicated, and everyone will look to government for their welfare checks. And this clash of cultures is fairly evident in Sanford that has a lot of retirees who want to live close to the Orlando area, but also has a lot of immigrant residences just looking for a foot into the American dream. And for those people, money is scarce and they envy those who have it. I was at a Piggly Wiggly in that area a few years ago when a group of 5 youths came into that grocery store while I was waiting for my wife to come out. All 5 boys looked like they were dressed for a Spike Lee movie and one boy had his pants pulled down so far that he had to hold them in place with his left hand. I watched him with great humor as he tried to open his car door while holding a bag of beverages in his right hand knowing his pants would fall down if he let go with his left. The gated communities are there to keep kids like that from vandalizing their homes and roaming across their back yards while they enjoy the fruits of their labor.
George Zimmerman was protecting that “gated” community concept by following around a suspicious character which turned out to be Trevon Martin. The two eventually had a scuffle and Zimmerman shot Trayvon probably because Zimmerman was losing the fight. I personally think Zimmerman should have used non-lethal weapons to incapacitate Trevon on his watch patrol. Resorting to a gun that only has a lethal option is very limiting in these kinds of conflicts, but listening to the circumstances around Zimmerman, he sounds like a typical mall cop, he was hungry to show his authority. I’ve also seen a lot of fights in parking lots and watched cops arrive on the scene ready to shoot everybody in an act of overreaction especially if one of the fighters had a gun. The panic is a cover for their real desire to fire their weapons and take the life of another human being. And I think deep down inside Zimmerman had a desire to prove to himself that he could make a decision like that—which is a common fantasy among young males. In fact, Mr. Progressive politics himself, Teddy Roosevelt signed up to charge San Jaun Hill in Cuba just so he could “kill a man” so this isn’t anything new. That may be a difficult reality for all the social engineers reading this and wondering how I could say such a thing to understand, but those types are simply out-of-touch as to what drives a young man.
Of course there are better ways to prove manhood, but in a culture of progressivism that is taking the human race backwards, toward a more tribe village mentality, they will discover that the need for violent conflicts will actually increase. This is the result of Hillary Clinton’s “it takes a village.” This is also why her husband Bill cheated on her insistently, because that is the village (communist) idea of no property values and shared sacrifice. It is progressive politics that makes these primitive desires worse, not better.
The proper thing for Zimmerman would have been to use a non-lethal martial art weapon or mace to incapacitate Trevon and if the young man attempted to use lethal force then to resort to the “Stand Your Ground Law” and use the firearm. There were so many options that weren’t used, and again, I blame progressive politics for preaching a message of peace, love, and charity—because these two young men did not know of any option besides fists and guns, and that is a breakdown in our culture. It is in the progressive desire to eradicate violence that they have not allowed young people to learn the art of conflict properly, because unfortunately, in any world at any time in history where some people function as a parasite on a human population, conflicts will occur.
The incident was sad, and a failure from all parties involved. But the situation become even sadder when the parasites discussed above saw that Trayvon was a black youth, and decided that they could capitalize on the situation and advance their own quests for power. That’s when they called for boycotts, and a national firestorm erupted over the last couple of weeks into what has become a joke—watching grown men and women who lack the fundamental principles of conduct in their own lives play into the parasitic apparatus of the Black Panthers, Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton and many others who sought to use the death of a young man to get them leverage over the human race in the manner of their Civil Rights idol Martin Luther King. But unlike King who was genuinely pointing out a lack of equality that all men and women under the Constitution deserved, the radicals who came after him disguised their message of equality to hide their own desire for power and control. The parasites want to see their name in a history book, they want to force further legislation of a progressive nature and they sought to use Trayvon to their evil ends.
You don’t see these parasites come out over black on black violence in South Chicago and you don’t hear them berating modern slavery in Africa, but if it’s a gated community in Florida and a black youth is involved, then they will ignore all the other death and mayhem that is occurring daily and focus on this one child because it suits their political objectives—and that makes them the worst kind of looters.
The looters in this case are those who have sought to use emotion to defy logic and to pass new laws and social precedence that will advance a progressive agenda. We have watched this process for years undermine the American way of life and rather than looking at Zimmerman and Trayvon with sympathy the looters actually seek to change the direction of society with a group “collective” hug. The looters all want to be a village chief or the king of a land and wish themselves heroes to save the day on the backs of Treayon’s death. You can see them in the governing bodies, media, entertainment and in Civil Rights advocates whose goals are not equality, but progressive advancement.
The looter—the social parasites of emotion do not care for Trayvon Martin or his family. Their outward concern is purely cosmetic and designed to conceal their real intentions, which is more power and prestige. And sadly, as many of them deep down inside consider themselves to be good little socialists working on behalf of the progressive cause, their actions are strangely capitalist. Only they don’t seek to make a new product, or create a new technology with their capitalist tendency, but to steal power while a nation cries and cannot see through its tears at what they are really up to. They seek to “capitalize” on our misery.
Unlike Sanford, Florida we cannot put up gates around our homes high enough to hold back the kinds of looters that have shown themselves in the Trayvon Martin tragedy, because these parasites will attempt to feed off the very air we breathe if we let them. They do not value personal property, individual sovereignty, or rational values. They are progressive socialists who wish with every cell in their bodies to make the United States into a communist nation under the flag of tribal collectivism, and it is they who are the real menace to our way of life.
But The United States Constitution protects us from these parasites if we allow it to. We are only compelled to listen to them if we allow our emotions to rule above our logic, and their words only have power if we let them. Ultimately we have protections against their encroachment and if we could only avoid the guilt they attempt to use on our minds to sap our strength and resolve, we could vanquish them into the oblivion of irrelevancy forever and hold our ground by a firm reliance on the Second Amendment. And at that time the grief that Trayvon Martin deserved, and the ego building that George Zimmerman needed could be established so that young people might learn an important lesson from this tragedy and not be doomed to repeat it because the problem was misdiagnosed by the collective will of our society led by looters and grandstanders.
Oh–you want more proof? You think I’m kidding you? You think all this is a conspiracy, because the knowledge is not convenient? Then read what’s at the link below and you’ll see how it was all set up in 1958 to create the world we are finding ourselves dealing with today. I’ve made it easy for you. All you have to do is look for yourself.
This series of videos is worth its weight in gold. It is done by a former Soviet Union student who is confronting some of the Wall Street Protestors. The conversations below evolve into a very good dialogue about the merits of socialism and communism. The videos show wonderfully the mentality that many victims of our public education system have given our society. One of the participants turns out to be a teacher. Enjoy getting down and dirty with the occupiers to see how and what they think and why!
George Soros…………….among others. CLICK HERE to see what I wrote about George Soros. But read below what Steve Kroft of CBS’s 60 Minutes said. The videos above show the influence of what people like Soros have accomplished with the 5 BILLION dollars that he spent on just the DNC in 2008. Soros has been spending money in politics since the Clintons were in The White House. The victims of that money are the people in the tents shown in those videos.
George Soros is an evil man. He’s anti-God, anti-family, anti-American, and anti-good.” He killed and robbed his own Jewish people. What we have in Soros, is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, and a sociopath’s lack of conscience. He considers himself to be an elitist World class philosopher, despises the American way, and just loves to do social engineering and change cultures.
György Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary . Soros’ father, Tivadar, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartz’s, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros, in order to facilitate assimilation into the Gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s
When Hitler’s henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary , to oversee the murder of that country’s Jews, George Soros ended up with a man whose job was confiscating property from the Jewish population. Soros went with him on his rounds.
Soros has repeatedly called 1944 “the best year of his life.” 70% of Mr. Soros’s fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year, yet he gives no sign that this put any damper on his elation, either at the time or indeed in retrospect” During an interview with “Sixty Minute’s” Steve Kroft, Soros was asked about his “best year.”
KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson. SOROS: Yes. Yes.
KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors. SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.
KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many, years. Was it difficult?
SOROS: No, not at all. Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.
Oh–you want more proof? You think I’m kidding you? You think all this is a conspiracy, because the knowledge is not convenient? Then read what’s at the link below and you’ll see how it was all set up in 1958 to create the world we are finding ourselves dealing with today. I’ve made it easy for you. All you have to do is look for yourself.
That ad is of course aimed at the diluted masses, the impatient consumer who just wants someone to take care of the worlds problems so they can watch basketball and go out to eat. So the target audience for that ad won’t do much investigation into the real troubles surrounding the Obama presidency. These are the types of people the Shadow Party targets in their social reform desires implemented through people like Barack Obama, and many other media figures.
But the reality behind ads such as the one seen above is that Barack Obama has caused many of his own problems with his socialist policies. His superiors in the Shadow Party–who finance his campaign–count on a majority of the American people to not look too closely at the real economic factors that surround the Shadow Party’s commitment to progressive socialism. The hope is that by the time people figure out what’s going on, it will be too late. The Shadow Party counts on Obama to sell his way back into office by “twisting” the truth enough to win another election, and maintain the agenda of the Shadow Party. Glenn Beck does a wonderful job in this next clip of disputing the diffusion the Obama administration is employing to hide their guilt in the terrible economic situation that progressive politics has given to the United States.
Most salesmen caught in a lie, will attempt to squander the truth and reshape it magically with terminology and antics they hope will fly above the head of the people they are trying to convince. Obama is a salesman who does this type of thing all the time. I think he’s so good at it that he believes his own misstatements, such as in this next clip also from Glenn Beck’s radio show.
Recently CBS did a report on a sheriff’s department that revealed that President Obama’s birth certificate from Hawaii was indeed a fake, after trying to prove that it was real. The Obama birther issue is a topic that has created a lot of trouble. First off—Obama is the first president to have such trouble. The Constitution is very specific about the eligibility of a United States President having to be born in the United States. This is such a serious situation that the Republicans encountered several road blocks when they wanted to run Arnold Schwarzenegger for president before he ran for Governor of California, but couldn’t because he was born in Austria, and had to give up. But the progressive left wanted Barack Obama for many reasons, and they apparently didn’t care whether he was born in the United States or not. Obama’s citizenship has one of two problems, he was either born in another country, or he was born in the United States and lost his citizenship when his step-father was called back to Indonesia where little Obama had to attend public school and later applied to American colleges under foreign student status. So Obama’s birth certification is very important to his eligibility to be president. Now, the most recent report is that the birth certificate that Obama produced to smash down the claims from Donald Trump that Obama was not a United States citizen and never was, has turned out to be a fake. And the Obama administration is doing exactly what they are doing with the energy policy shown above–they are hoping to “glaze” over the whole situation and tell people what they are seeing–they really aren’t.
This should be deeply disconcerting. Glenn Beck, who along with many others does not want to get caught in the “birther” trap that the progressive left has set, and spend too much time on this whole issue—the eligibility of the president. All practical people know that the senate does not have the 60 votes to impeach a sitting president, and there is not a will by anyone in the political system to actually follow the law, because that would be an admission that everything President Obama has done over the last 3 and a half years has been illegal, and that would really cause trouble. So Beck and many others have agreed to overlook the issue as a distraction because the progressive left has captured the public opinion debate.
This is the work of that Shadow Party I’ve been talking about. When Obama says that the country has far more important things to consider than the validity of his birth certificate, it must be noted that Obama has no interest in preserving the Constitution as it is written. He believes it’s a fluid document that should constantly be adjusted, and he has no trouble making up his own rules as he goes, so to him obtaining the American Presidency illegally is no big deal. His supporters in the Shadow Party have a plan to crush the American Constitution anyway, so it means nothing to them if they trample upon it. All they have to do is buy time, as they have so far.
Before Obama ever became president this should have been a big deal. He should have had to prove eligibility of being a natural-born citizen before being placed on a ballot in each state. But the Shadow Party had it all worked out. If anyone questioned Obama’s eligibility they were called a racist, and nobody wanted to be called that. So everyone just let the issue slide by without a fight. The progressive left uses the same strategy when proposing tax increases for schools. They will call you selfish, or a child hater if you don’t agree to a higher tax. And in politics on the highest stage the Shadow Party had the rules already laid out ahead of time with their activity in the civil rights movement. The Shadow Party made it so illegal activity could be pushed through in the light of day in front of everyone’s faces. If a challenger emerged they would be called the “R” word. This strategy has paralyzed the law, and public opinion, and allowed crimes to be committed out in the open.
So now we have proof that there is something very wrong with President Obama’s birth certificate. We know his administration has a tendency to manipulate the facts in his favor as shown by the way he presents his energy policy, and they count on people being too busy to look too closely at the facts. And we now have this president seeking re-election under the same convoluted status. We also have three branches of government and an entire judicial system, with a journalism corps that lacks any desire to hold the president to the fundamental requirement to be President of the United States, the ability to prove that he is a natural-born citizen without millions of dollars spent defending his position and fake documents presented. There is no desire to hold the President to the law of the Constitution and the Shadow Party has made it this way by proclaiming any inquiry into the President’s citizenship is a side-show act and is distracting to the country’s business. And the masses believe it. Anyone who questions the president’s citizenship is called the derogatory name of “birther.” When in fact such a question is perfectly justified and should be required to be proven before any state in the nation puts Barack Obama on a ballot for President of the United States.
But what good is a law on a piece of paper if a majority of the legislators and even the president himself ignores it? A law ignored and unenforced is ineffective. The precedent established by this current president means that any one from any country in the future can be President of the United States if enough people want them—to hell with the Constitution. That’s why this is a serious situation and every politician who treats the “birther” issue lightly could be assumed to be either members of the Shadow Party, or victims of it.
My response to this whole “birther” issue is that if the laws of the Constitution don’t mean anything to this president and his legislative counterparts, then why should I honor any law any of those fools put down on paper. Why should I pay any attention to the NDAA Act, or the President’s multiple Executive Orders?
History will prove later that Obama was a foreign resident who most likely lost his citizenship due to acts beyond his control, and it will be revealed that he is technically–in 2012, an illegal president–and everything he has done in office is illegal as well. So why should I pay attention to any of it? Why should I obey laws that these politicians don’t? They aren’t my kings, my nobles, or my superiors. They are my public servants, and it looks like they are habitual liars and thieves, and the words they utter mean nothing—so what compels me to listen? To believe them?
If the president will mislead the public with his record over energy just so he can deflect the attention away from his failed policies during his presidency, what do you think he’d be willing to do over a more serious issue, such as proving his citizenship? When Sheriff Joe Arpaio goes on CBS television and proclaims to the world that he has proven that the birth certificate President Obama submitted is a fake, and the president’s people put up no better defense than to proclaim that it’s a sideshow act—then something is amiss. Something deeply troubling, even sinister is afoot. And it’s not the world that we see that is pulling the strings, but the Shadow Party that speaks, leaving people like the Sheriff in awe over how corrupt our system of government already is. And when it is realized that the laws of our land mean nothing, and that the people we elect to represent our interests are only slaves to a Shadow Party beyond our control, then we have a major problem on our hands that needs to be rectified. And it won’t be solved by playing fair while they work against us hiding behind the law and misleading the truth through smiles and magic tricks.
Oh–you want more proof? You think I’m kidding you? You think all this is a conspiracy, because the knowledge is not convenient? Then read what’s at the link below and you’ll see how it was all set up in 1958 to create the world we are finding ourselves dealing with today. I’ve made it easy for you. All you have to do is look for yourself.
The public education system is one of the biggest scams currently in the country. It’s certainly not about Friday night football and basketball. A majority of the students are victims of this education monopoly and find themselves ill prepared for the real world once they graduate, so the education system is hardly a model of excellence. It only exists for the same reason the mob exists, and that is to make money. Educrats don’t truly care what’s good for the community otherwise they wouldn’t charge so much for their service. They certainly don’t care for children otherwise they would never threaten to walk off the job for higher pay, like what happened at Lakota in 2008. They care about becoming millionaires off the looted money the public sends to these schools as payoffs—just like hush money paid to the mob.
I’ll say it again—if you vote for a school levy you’re stupid. If you blindly support educrats who put forth a very controlled public persona by tossing money at them hoping it will all just make kids magically smart and prepared for life, you are kidding yourself. All you’re doing is supporting a monopoly that is making its employees millionaires. And you’re doing it off your hard work, off the value of your property, and off the back of your own children. You are in essence doing no different from what thousands of businesses have done with the mob—gave them money so that they don’t attempt to hurt you. That is how these educrats have gotten so wealthy. They didn’t get that way by providing a superior service, or by being the best at what they do. They got that way by eliminating any competition, and putting the hurt on anyone who challenges them.
People do not correlate the mobster with the educrat because the educrat looks like a nice person. They wear a suit and tie, and speak well in face to face meetings. We tend to think of the mobster as carrying around a machine gun and sporting a scar on their faces. But in reality, the typical educrat acts, thinks, and believes no different from the typical mobster. They think nothing of stealing from the world around them no matter what the impact is to those who are stolen from. It doesn’t matter if the talk is around a back room table over whiskey playing cards as we might imagine with the mob, or over lattés while reading USA Today with a group of like-minded assassins not wanting to kill people, but personalities who stand in their way. They are all thugs because they steal from others to gain for themselves. And they maintain the monopolies of “their turf” in the same fashion.
The latte sipping assassins are actually worse than the mobster because they “believe” they are right. They believe they are granted moral permission to embark on a holy crusade at the expense of the world around them. And they believe these things because they are serving a system that is producing more millionaires than any other employment group in the United States. And they do it using the same tactics as a crime syndicate. They use their latte sipping prostitutes to do their dirty work for them, to carry out the maniacal deeds of stealing money from their communities with batted eyes and perked up lips and pleas to not hurt the children with poor funding.
If you vote for a school levy, this is the system you are supporting. This is what is happening to the money you are sending. It’s going into the bank account of a millionaire—while you struggle to pay your mortgage, or decide if you can take your family out to a restaurant to eat. While you try to figure out if you can afford gas, these educrats are living high on the hog and planning their exotic summer long vacations with money they stole from you, by twisting your arm any way possible to get the loot. That’s why if you vote for a school levy–you are stupid. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ABOUT THIS TERRIBLE SITUATION. You are simply making another millionaire.
Oh–you want more proof? You think I’m kidding you? You think all this is a conspiracy, because the knowledge is not convenient? Then read what’s at the link below and you’ll see how it was all set up in 1958 to create the world we are finding ourselves dealing with today. I’ve made it easy for you. All you have to do is look for yourself.
Every human being has a choice as to whether or not they elect to partake in a service or not. So a boycott on a personal level is a perfectly understandable thing. The trouble begins when collective minded beings with their warped sense of values decide to bring economic hardship to an organization so to coerce that organization into behaving “properly.” And the proper behavior is determined by the “group” advocating the boycott. In the case of the person sending the letter to the restaurant they act under the assumption that the children of the school district are “state property” and that all children who attend the school are to be protected by their version of reality—in this case—property of the school and their fight to keep the school funded at the level they decide. There are many flaws in this thinking. The first of which is that children are not “property” of the state, or school. Children and their families are sovereign individuals and are not compelled into action by any government organization—especially a school. This argument is made well by this video by the Ayn Rand Institute.
Anyone who mutters the word “boycott” in an attempt to control massive group behavior is a villain to society. It does not matter if they are your friends, your neighbors or your babysitter, they are still villains. If a person advocates a boycott they are attempting a military maneuver against an entity, and that is considered an act of war by any definition. The person who advocated a boycott of the restaurant above was committing an evil act of aggression. The people involved in the radio station situation at the link above committed evil against the station. Anytime a group gathers in force to attempt economic pain to an individual or an organization they are practicing extortion against the personal sovereignty of the attacked.
The boycott advocate believes that they are “right” in a matter and that their action against someone who disagrees with them is to bring pain so that the behavior will change. That is extortion. It is an act of aggression. But how can anyone know that the boycott advocate I right? If they were right, then wouldn’t others arrive at their same conclusions naturally?
The boycotter is often wrong in their thinking, so they must rely on economic extortion in order to get dissidents to participate in their erroneous thinking. The boycotter is attempting to take the rational conclusions of the dissident and alter them into a collective buy-off done by arm twisting and peer pressure applied by group behavior. This is not done out of respect for the thoughts of the target. It is done to force the target to comply to the thoughts of the attacker.
To refer back to the restaurant, the owner did not support a tax increase by the school. So the intent of the letter was to force corporate ownership to apply pressure on the local owner to alter the owner’s opinion through economic terrorism. It didn’t matter if the owner did not agree with the tax increase. All that mattered was that the owner becomes convinced through pressure to change their mind. This is the essence behind the boycott.
In this same community the voters have voted down tax increases 3 times in a two-year period. The community spoke. However, levy advocates do not care that 18,000 voters said no and only 16,000 said yes. The boycotter seeks to change the numbers by attacking 2000 of those voters to and gain leverage on them be it emotional, economic, or perhaps even physical so the next time the vote comes around then they will win the vote by forcing at least 2000 more to voters their way through fear alone.
If a group feels that it must apply extortive pressure through the use of a boycott, it’s a good sign that the content of their idea is a bad one. In the case of the tax levy of my community, if a majority thought it was the right thing to do, they would have voted in favor. In effect the voters who voted the tax increase down had a boycott of their own, and refused to give money to an organization that did not match the values of the community. However, these boycott advocates do not respect those opinions. They believe incorrectly that the children they are “fighting” for are members of the state. They believe that once a child is born from its mother that the child becomes “community property.” (They believe this as a result of their actions even if they don’t say it with their mouths) So the boycott advocates decide to take up a holy crusade on behalf of the children to fill the emptiness of their thoughts which is why they are evil. They are functioning from a faulty political position made so by the weakness of their argument and failure at the ballot box, and resort to boycotts to change minds with the next vote.
A good person is that way because they have thoughts and actions unique to their personal sovereignty. They become bad if they assimilate with a group pack mentality that is wrong, and if they compromise their personal feelings to join with a group in mass. The boycotter is attempting to make a wrong idea right through massive group participation. They believe that if enough people believe something, then suddenly the wrong idea will become fashionable and therefore good.
Many crimes against humanity have been done in this fashion. Religions do it to each other, businesses do it to each other, and politicians do it to each other. Just because it is widely practiced does not make it good or right. It simply means that there are a lot of people functioning from psychotic behavior. It is their broken, distorted versions of reality that are at fault, and they cannot be allowed to inflict their incoherent visions upon the sane just because they can organize a boycott.
Boycotts are conceived by the psychotic schizophrenic who is functioning by many different impulses, just because they look sane from a distance and dress like everyone else it does not make them correct. The psychotic in an attempt to avoid their illness, their broken understanding of reality—in the example above, that all children are members of the state—will attempt group consensus to camouflage their foolishness. They will seek to pull the whole world down upon their heads to protect their faulty ideas from being discovered in the light of day. They will stop at nothing to work the world into their reality instead of the reality of reasonable thinking human beings driving their actions.
This is why such people are dangerous. This is why they are evil. The boycotter seeks to impose their beliefs upon the world around them and they have no respect or sympathy for those who differ from them. If they cannot convince the world of the merit of their ideas though facts, conversation, or emotional pleas, then they resort to extortion—the boycott—if agreement cannot be reached as they see it. They fully intend to bring pain to those who disagree with them. That is the message behind the boycott. And that is the type of personality behind the boycotter, a broken human being who wishes to make the world into their image. A refuge of the small little insanities contained within their distorted principles is reflected in the desire for a boycott. The heart of their folly is the belief that they can make something wrong, correct if enough people are “convinced” to think their way—that if a group can be manipulated into believing something they individually do not, then wrong ideas will be made valid just by the sheer number of opinions cast in their direction. And such an idea could only be conceived by those with distorted perceptions of reality functioning from a derelict philosophic position. This is why my quick term for them is latte sipping prostitutes because there really isn’t much difference if you sit them down in a chair and get them talking. The rationale tends to be similar once the onion is peeled away to reveal the mess that is inside their heads. And to hide that mess not just from the world, but from themselves, they often resort to boycotts.
Oh–you want more proof? You think I’m kidding you? You think all this is a conspiracy, because the knowledge is not convenient? Then read what’s at the link below and you’ll see how it was all set up in 1958 to create the world we are finding ourselves dealing with today. I’ve made it easy for you. All you have to do is look for yourself.
One of the reasons I dislike government schools so much, especially now that I’ve had the opportunity to see how they function up close, is that they are turning our children into veal—mush minded, overly-compassionate- gray minded slugs. Government schools, otherwise known as “public schools” are advancing progressive politics and have become overly sensitive to political correctness and they’ve done it with money they’ve stolen from us in the form of property taxes. For a bizarre example of one fine case of just such a story check out this New York Post story from Yoav Gonen.
I love Yoav’s use of the word “educrats,” which is entirely appropriate to these times of political correctness. The sum of the tragedy discussed in the New York Post article is that schools can no longer discuss in class references to religion, dinosaurs, Halloween, poverty, wealth, junk food, dancing, divorces, or diseases. There are of course many more terms that cannot be discussed in schools these days, but those are just some of the examples mentioned in the article. The emphasis in education now is to not offend anyone, to make it so everyone has a pleasant experience and that every child understands the merits of “social justice,” so that they will grow up to become nice little tree hugging hippies and slack-jawed patrons at their local sports bar.
When I was in school I took computer classes learning how to program a very primitive Apple Computer. Within four years Bill Gates was mass marketing Microsoft Software that completely made useless everything I learned in two years of computer classes. That information is only good for a nostalgic understanding of how computers think, but it would do me no good for programming a modern computer. The same could be said of foreign language classes—who needs them? If we want kids to learn a foreign language why would we force children to take two years in high school when they could spend 6 months with Rosetta Stone Software and become proficient in another language in a quarter of the time? There are literally hundreds of similar examples of how education could be improved, yet we are continuing to waste the time of our youth because of some strange nostalgic affection with the past.
Government schools headed by “educrats” aren’t producing geniuses like Albert Einstein, or Thomas Edison. They are making activists like Bill Ayers and Barack Obama. They are breeding future union protestors and kids who spend their entire weekends drunk and clueless. That is what happens when educrats teach kids. The kids aren’t allowed to learn about anything because everything has become too political in the government schools, and nothing can be discussed out of sensitivity to “social justice.”
So why is society so hell-bent on a public education? Do parents just want baby-sitters for their children? Why do government schools run by unions want a monopoly on education—so they can drive up the costs? Because the kids coming out of public education aren’t exactly lighting up the world with new inventions and political genius. What is the appeal, because I see almost nothing that makes a government school essential to the life of a child?
Think about it. Why should society send children to a government school? What are the benefits? Because I don’t see any. I hear a lot of talk from schools who want money, and unions who want control about how valuable they are, but how can they be valuable when all they seem able to teach children is how to believe in global warming, and how to be an activist.
I would have gone insane in public school if I couldn’t pretend to shoot at my classmates in games of cowboys and Indians during recess. If not for the fun of running and hiding behind trees and playground props there may have been nothing positive to come out of public school for me. I can’t imagine being a kid now where they can’t even do that. Heck, they can’t even say “Indian,” they must now say, “Native American.”
Government schools have made themselves extinct. There is no modern use for them. The only real benefit they seem to have is as social institutions where kids interact with other kids. But as far as building up the intellect of students—I don’t see it—and I’ve been looking. The accreditation a child receives means almost nothing in a world that is changing so fast, that what is learned today will be out-of-fashion within a few years. It’s the core stuff that children need to learn—all the stuff mentioned in the New York Post article—that can no longer be discussed. And with that in mind, what’s the point of spending $10,000 per pupil of tax money on a system that doesn’t work? Because it makes us feel like we’re doing something? If so, where are the results? Where’s the proof? What is the reason to continue on in the same fashion without serious reform?
The real answers to education are outside of the government schools run by educrats. The sooner we decide to cast those progressive activists out of our lives, the sooner we can actually begin to solve some of our modern problems. And for me, I would start with introducing competition to the education process, so schools couldn’t play it safe by dumbing down their instruction to fit some “social justice” model that is unwanted, but would actually have to teach so that the customer—the parents—would want to keep their child in the school by choice, not by force. The answers are in choices, not more educrats, political correctness, and government schools. CLICK HERE FOR MORE EXAMPLES OF HOW EDUCATION SHOULD BE.
To understand the truth it helps to view the world through Hoffman Lenses. To understand what those are CLICK THE LINK. If you can’t handle the truth, then don’t read here.
When people who don’t pay too much attention to things wonder why education issues make me so angry it’s probably because they don’t see it from the underbelly like I have. Those same personalities might be inclined to consider that looking too closely at how things connect would be regulated to conspiracy. However the reality of such people is that they are simply too lazy to look at the evidence, or the evidence is “inconvenient” for them to learn, because once they accept it they might feel inclined to act, and that would require a responsibility they are not comfortable with. The information that follows is that kind of information. The links to the supporting evidence or at least the tip of the iceberg is there for all to see. All one has to do is look at it. But there is a danger, because once an individual knows the information, they are responsible. They will either do something about it, or they will choose to ignore it which contributes to more of the bad behavior. But the knowledge erases the ignorance, and the manipulation that allows such injustices to be committed upon our communities. Pretending the injustices aren’t in front of us all won’t make them go away into convenience. And the implication of negligence will define much about us as individuals, families, communities, or even the human race. The decisions we make right now will define us well into the foreseeable future, and so far I see that it is the short-sighted of us that is winning. And I will admit that it makes me very angry.
Dealing with these people who have drunk the kool-aid of the education entitlement culture is like dealing with an infant baby. All they can do is cry to get what they want. You can’t explain anything to these education culture people because they have such entrenched ideas and aren’t open to discussions outside of their reality–inside their crib. So the world of bigger ideas is completely foreign to them, and it’s impossible to explain it to them until they grow older and become more experienced. All you can do with such infants is just let them cry so they learn that nobody is going to give them what they want. The article below reflects much of this type of crying that is disguised as sophisticated opinion but in reality is simply just noise designed to provoke a panic reaction from the parents of the community. And it’s disgusting, and insulting.
Yes, as reported by the Cincinnati Enquirer on 3/27/12 Lakota’s next move as one of the most prestigious government schools in all of Ohio is turning toward its children who attend the school to help them solve their budget problems. Superintendent Mantia stated that she intends to select 180 students from the district to participate in a series of “engagement meetings” to ask the children what they think their future will be. Once this process is done, Mantia intends to parade those students out in front of the public to plead for more tax money.
It’s just a guess, but I’d say the 180 children selected will have a “please give the school more money so we can have a future,” message that they will say to the public. Without question the school board is prepared to use those children now to help them sell their school levy. I will bet money that some of those children will be paraded in front of the school board in front of all the cameras to plead to the community to pass a school levy so they can have an education……………tears anybody………….it will be so very, very……….sad.
But I’m predicting the future here. These are things that will happen, not what’s happening currently. Also according to Superintendent Mantia from the same Enquirer article she reports that Moody’s Investors Service “MIGHT” lower the district’s bond rating. She reported that out of the 613 public schools in all of Ohio only 10 have the top AAA bond rating. She said that Moody’s “Particularly hone in on districts that are losing levies.” So because Lakota has failed three school levies, there is a risk that our interest rates will go up if we lose our AAA rating. (kind of sounds like what America is going through—Hmmmmmmm)
So in the very same article Superintendent Mantia is telling us that if we don’t pass a school levy, then we will lose our bond rating, and we’ll be hurting children, this is of course implied. Nothing is ever directly said. That just might cause a lot of parents to panic—maybe even homeowners and business owners. Oh my—that is scary stuff! The message is that everyone should panic so that the community will pass another school levy.
This kind of behavior should insult the intelligence of everyone who has a brain. Any organization that uses fear in this fashion should be questioned as to their intentions. When people question what the solution is to these government schools, the answer is to control the costs, don’t let the costs control you. In the case of Lakota they are letting the costs of 80% of their budget drive all the bad things that are happening in the other 20% which is where all the detrimental cuts have occurred. The labor union that has refused by default to renegotiate their contract with the district due to the three levy failures is to blame for why Moody’s is threatening a downgrade. Lakota is infested with a radical, selfish labor force that is certainly willing to destroy our community so that they can protect their gold-plated wages and benefits. (Just because they smile and speak in complete sentences, they can still think and believe as a progressive radical does)
When I first became involved in these levy fights I often heard from teachers who said, “You’ll support players in sports who make millions of dollars, but you won’t support a teacher who gives a child a future.” That kind of rhetoric is standard union nonsense right out of the NEA playbook. My response to that ridiculous statement is that even sports teams have limits. Players are often let go from teams because a team can’t afford them. CLICK HERE TO SEE AN EXAMPLE OF THIS.If teachers and administrators make too much money, they should be let go in favor of cheaper employees, just like the way the rest of the world functions. It is the refusal of these employees who make over $63K per year on average to cut even 5% to save the community they live and work in–it is they and everyone behind them who have caused all this trouble.
When the only resort for an organization is to use fear to get what it wants, then the validity of their argument must be questioned. If the facts of the matter cannot stand on its own, then why is fear needed to provoke a reaction? Because the organization in question is up to no good.
What we’re dealing with at Lakota and most public schools is a radical, union workforce that hides behind layers of emotional supporters directly attached to children. I would say that any organization that hides behind children to create emotional support is a faulty organization that is scamming the public. The solution to this budget problem is very simple. Superintendent Mantia has been given a budget by the community and she is required to live within that budget. But her real boss is the labor union. That’s who is wagging the dog in this case and dictating to her and a token school board what to do. If Moody’s drops Lakota’s credit rating it will be during the term of the quarter million dollar woman, Superintendent Mantia and will thus be her fault for not finding a way to maintain that rating. She chose to participate in the union extortion tactics of the community instead of forcing the labor to live within the community’s budget. She is the one who has decided to fight half the community who has voted against her by turning the minority into the majority with a contentious levy battle three times that has given Lakota national headlines. Those acts were done by the school with radicals acting behind the scenes who are simply acting on behalf of their selfish interests. Make no question about it—when these employees attempt to say that everything they do is for children, they are lying. Much of what they do is to protect their extraordinary compensation packages. CLICK HERE TO SEE HOW GOOD THEY ARE.If money was not the driver, then the union would have taken a 5% concession to help the community stay strong without tax increases, and maintain the excellence of the school district. Instead, these radical employees are choosing to hide behind children to twist the arm of the community, and are attempting to wreak the bond rating with a public relations campaign designed to incite fear through the business community.
If these employees of the Lakota School District were so interested in doing what’s right for the children, they wouldn’t attempt to even inject them into the debate. It is the school boards job with Superintendent Mantia to make their payroll fit the budget allocation while still providing the services the community expects. These radical cutbacks of 20% of the budget while protecting the 80% is disgusting and an insulting display of arrogance from an organization that seeks to make itself the center of community value. Yet in that role, they fail to make the sacrifices they ask the rest of the community to make. They expect everyone but them to make a sacrifice. And if they don’t get it, they chose to hide behind children. And that should go a long way to revealing what they are really all about.
I see the tricks shown in the Enquirer article by Superintendent Mantia to be among the lowest of the lows. It actually sets a new standard for deceptive practice that is despicable. And what’s worse, there are many parents who will allow their children to be used for these tactics. On the surface, everything looks spiffy. Everything seems very professional. But all anyone has to do is raise up the rug just a little bit to see all the dirt that’s been pushed under it, to see what is really going on. And the fact of the matter is that Lakota is protecting its labor union at the cost of the community. Pure and simple.
If the issue were simply a straight up and down vote about the level of taxation in our communities, I wouldn’t have a problem. But when boycotts are organized against those who disagree with one side and vandalism is encouraged against those with opposing views then there is a serious problem, and that’s been my experience with dealing with these tax culture education people. When an organization openly manipulates the voters with games, and emotional tactics, and disrespects the voters over a three-year period with more tax increase demands, then there are serious problems with that organization. There comes a time when an organization’s value must come into question, and I would say that we are there with the Lakota School District. After three years of fighting them over tax increases I no longer have any faith or trust in them as an organization. I don’t think I should have to pay one cent to such a corrosive organization run by such selfish employees. I see that my money has been wasted so far on a system that I don’t agree with, that is teaching kids all the wrong progressive values, and I think it should be in my right to opt out of paying the tax all together—and not even entertain further taxes. I think this is the new direction that must be pursued, because it’s obvious that these education employees understand only one path—more taxes—more behavior of the tail wagging the dog—and a level of selfishness that I don’t think should be taught to children in any capacity. It deeply disturbs me that a school would even consider bringing children into this debate. And it should concern you too.
To understand the truth it helps to view the world through Hoffman Lenses. To understand what those are CLICK THE LINK. If you can’t handle the truth, then don’t read here.
