Tag: Government

Civilian Oversight is the Key to Everything: Without it, corruption rules the world

So, what’s at the heart of the world’s trouble presently, and how do we fix it?  What is the meaning of a book like Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia?  What can we possibly do about it all? How can we hope to fight it?  Well, that’s an easy question to answer.  And it is the key to all the political turmoil we are experiencing presently.  It all comes down to a respect of civilian oversight over governments and authorities.  Those who do not want to be under the scrutiny of civilian oversight run to groups to protect themselves from the results of their ambitions, like the Vatican, the mob, and even in government jobs who use the power of collectivism to hide their menace from the public, like the CIA.  It’s far more complicated than all that, but in Operation Gladio by Paul Williams, we at least get a good view of the problem and its history.  Operation Gladio goes back to formation just after World War II, when many bad things happened, especially with the formation of the United Nations.  Because those European countries and other places in the world do not have a notion of civilian oversight in their cultures, as promised by the American Constitution.  What makes the American Constitution so powerful is its admission that authority figures, if given power over others, will abuse that power 100% of the time.  So, civilian oversight is always needed to preserve integrity.  Without that scrutiny, corruption always happens.  It is the conflict to eradicate civilian oversight that the world is most hungry for presently because of what was revealed by President Trump’s presidency.  Respect for the people who put you in power is the core debate.  Many in the world, especially in the United States Washington D.C. culture, want to believe they can rule over the masses like some classed aristocracy rather than a jury of their peers. 

China has tried to pressure America into following communism because they say it’s more efficient.  Look what a government can do when it doesn’t have to deal with civilian oversight, and instead, the power of government can take a house and destroy a family through communism.  And do whatever it wants for society’s general good, as determined by those running it.  If any civilian or other familiar person thinks it has power over the government, the government will have the power to show them otherwise.  At the core of that debate is the attempt to grab guns in America and eradicate concepts of free speech and gun rights to protect that speech from government oversight.  Governments that want to function as top-down communist centralized authority wish to define, for instance, what speech is acceptable and what truth is, and they expect not to be questioned about it by ordinary, everyday civilians.  However, in American culture, our legal system goes way out of its way, as demanded by our Constitutional rights, to put limits on what the government can do because history reports that if left alone to their own devices, power corrupts everyone at some point and civilian oversight is the key to managing that corruption and keeping it from harm’s way.  The massive expense of American law is needed because people with power can’t be trusted.  They must be managed through civilian oversight.  The entire foundation of America’s approach to government, society in general, and preserving personal liberty is implementing civilian oversight to keep the government big enough to function but not powerful enough to function as a tyrannical force.

At its core, this is why Trump is so hated.  He was elected and ran his entire presidential platform on the promise of civilian oversight.  People picked him over the machine of Beltway politics.  He does what people want of him.  He openly consults the Constitution to settle disputes, empowering civilian oversight rather than trying to crush it out of existence, which is the campaign platform of Democrats.  They, in essence, promise free stuff given to people who vote for them, and that free stuff comes from the confiscated wealth that Democrats steal through the power of government.  Lately, there have been a lot of cases where civilian oversight has been horrendously disrespected so that a government narrative could be established, such as these mass shootings, whether the killer who tried to assassinate President Trump or the school shootings that occur by transexual kids who fell off the rocker, we find at the heart of all these cases provocations and failures of the three lettered agencies, such as the FBI and the CIA.  When the CIA was created to help fight communism around the world, supposedly, they desired to function without congressional oversight at all so that they could operate without civilian oversight.  Because ultimately, members of Congress represent the people who vote for them, and the CIA should be reporting to Congress to get its funding.  Instead, the CIA was set up to fund a large part of its activities, according to books like Operation Gladio, with sales from the illegal drug trade, which makes sense.  It also explains a lot of problems in the world when these various groups, whether it be the Vatican, the mob, or the CIA, fight against any civilian oversight into their diabolical mechanisms of doom and mayhem. 

And without that civilian oversight, corruption grows like weeds quickly because that’s a human condition.  The world needs its version of the American Constitution to manage the level of corruption it experiences as a society.  When the CIA is pressed for civilian oversight, they have played the “alien card” through the years, reports about alien spacecraft and the characters who fly them, to keep the public content behind a veil of secrecy, all for national security.  They say their need for black budgets is more critical than the need for civilian oversight.  That is why there is so much terror about Trump becoming president again because he has said he will release the actual report on the Kennedy assassination and that deregulation will take away the power of many government agencies to function without civilian oversight.  Yet, there has never been a society in the history of the world, anywhere, that was able to function without civilian oversight.  And the United States has been the best example, even at the tremendous cost of having it.  Checks on power are critical to the insanity, specific to those who get power and are tempted to use it in destructive ways.  And that is the problem with the CIA.  Without civilian oversight, which it has virtually none, not even in how it is funded, being funded by an illegal drug trade that feeds off the demise of the world’s population, the CIA has become a corrupt organization that can do whatever it wants to anybody it wants to, and if they make a mistake, there is nobody to correct them. And it has worked so well for them; every other three-letter agency has wanted to copy their example.  That is certainly the case with the FBI.  We are supposed to believe whatever they say, even though in all the mass shootings, there were red flags given to them that they did not act on, purposely or not.  Even Homeland Security, over the issue of President Trump’s security.  They didn’t understand why civilian oversight was so meaningful when they were drug before Congress to explain their failures, which ended in at least a significant resignation over office deficiencies.  The world fights against civilian oversight and the desire to rule over people, not to have people free of such constraints and to impose their judgment on their social betters.  The conspiracy against civilian oversight is the desire to rule over mass society and not to have ordinary people regulating government power for its own sake and creation.  And anything that does not have civilian oversight should be said to be abolished for good as useless and ineffective.  This then explains why people want power in the first place: to avoid oversight by those who might judge them and find their lives lacking in the opinions of civilian oversight.  The goal of those conspirators is to get rid of the judgments of the public and hide behind the power of government to conceal their worthless condition from the world.  And it really isn’t any more than that.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

They Call Them Lily Whites: How Assassins are created by drug funded organizations hell-bent on Political Radicalism

They call them Lily Whites, the kind of people that were put in place to kill President Trump.  That’s what the intelligence community calls them; it’s a technique they have used for years to assassinate people they want out of the way.  Find a kind of fringy white kid already off their rocker a bit and push him off with some gentle or not-so-gental nudging.  And soon, you have a young white male full of discontent, ready to throw their life away for some social cause, knowing full well that they won’t walk away from the matter alive.  I could get into all kind of evidence based details of how this kind of international mob works, but to simplify it, the CIA utilizes this technique all over the world, best known as Operation Gladio, which goes back to World War II and is funded by black budgets not connected to congress, or any voter based oversight, and they operate as a fourth branch of government and have been in the business of killing people for decades.  This kid who tried to kill Trump, Mathew Crooks, fits almost the exact profile and mode of behavior as Timothy McVeigh did in the Oklahoma City bombing.  McVeigh didn’t just wake up one day and decide to kill a bunch of innocent people with a rented truck filled with explosives.  He had help, a lot of help, starting with a bunch of Iraqi radicals all juiced up by the CIA living as a terrorist cell in Oklahoma City.  There was in the truck with McVeigh, and escaping from the scene of the crime that horrible day of April 19th, 1995, a Middle Eastern terrorist who was there all along.  After the killing, there were more than 22 sworn witnesses collected by television reporter Jayna Davis from Channel 4 Oklahoma City, who saw a Middle Eastern man with McVeigh before and after the most significant terrorist act to happen on American soil at that time.  And guess who decided not to pursue all those leads and instead harassed the reporter for asking questions about the official narrative?  The FBI, of course, is looking out for their friends in the intelligence community who have plenty of candy to sprinkle around to plenty of agents not happy with their already inflated government pensions.  There is a lot of drug money that the CIA uses to fund their activities, and for people who play ball with them, it’s a quick way to get a lifetime of security and a free condo in Florida. 

Oh, and yes, it’s not a question any longer about these same characters using the Lily White model to nudge the killers in 9/11 to do their deed.  Many of the same kind of people behind the Oklahoma City bombing were involved in that one as well.  Just find a few people willing to die for a cause and push them toward the target.  We’d see the same kind of coverups in subsequent years, the San Bernadino Christmas shooting and the Las Vegas shooter, which we still don’t know much about.  Most mass shootings can be traced back to this Lily White terrorist approach of weaponizing young radicals without a lot of parental support and casting them into a situation of terror where they are killed at the scene of the crime or quickly captured and disposed of in other ways.  That’s what they did with McVeigh, who went to his grave, not telling anybody about his Iraqi friends.  The FBI didn’t want to know and covered up the tracks.  And McVeigh was so anti-government that he thought he was sticking it to the man even up to the day of his lethal injection execution. 

Many people have asked me over the years what the difference is between Timothy McVeigh and someone like me, who has a lot of opinions about government and how the world should work.  Well, this is a common motivation for the creation of Lily Whites, which the CIA and FBI are very well aware of to the point where it’s an internal joke among them.  They are easy to make and use for committing crimes toward political activism they want to see happen.  But I could never be a Lily White or be anything like Timothy McVeigh.  McVeigh became radicalized during his Gulf War experience and began to sympathize with the people under the thumb of the American military, and he took that anger out on the government.  I see the government as representative of the American people and as needing reform to perform the task.  Lily Whites usually end up wanting some form of anarchy, and their controllers can then push their psychological buttons to shove them in the direction to make that happen.  So the FBI will say about Crooks that he was obsessed with Trump and saw that day in Butler, Pennsylvania, as a “target of opportunity,” and they can get away with it because that part is genuine.  They don’t tell anybody the rest of the story, the part they played in the effort.  Crooks was talking to people before the shooting, and it looked like they had foreign connections. Some of the cell phone pings trace to a character in Washington, D.C., near the FBI building.  There is a lot of circumstantial evidence there, but the FBI is investigating the case, so nobody in the CIA is worried about anything tracing back to them.  They’ve done this many times before and got away with it.  And they will continue to do it so long as nobody busts them for their domestic terrorism and political manipulation. 

No, of course not; this is not a conspiracy theory.  After 9/11, serious journalism looked at this story about Oklahoma City and tried to break it loose.  Even Glenn Beck and Bill O’Reilly did pieces on it, using the excellent work Jayna Davis had done as a reporter, which uncovered all kinds of stones.  However, the story died in predictable ways, especially after 9/11.  Jayna wrote a book called The Third Terrorist, laying the whole thing out for a court to prosecute.  But The New York Times corporation did what is now a familiar story all over America when it comes to radical communism and characters like Larry Fink, who happens to run Blackrock when all he wanted to do in his life was be in politics as a young hippie from California, is they have bought up most of the media companies.  The New York Times is a corporation, and they bought Channel 4 in Oklahoma City in the aftermath of all this, and they went woke before anybody knew what it was.  I have seen the same thing happen in Cincinnati with the Enquirer bought by Gannett, the same company running USA Today.  Jayna quit her job at that station after the corporate takeover, and there was a court battle over the evidence she had collected on the Oklahoma City bombing.  Which she eventually won, but six or seven years later, nobody cared or remembered.  The world had moved on.  They built a memorial there in Oklahoma City, just like in New York.  People mourned for the losses but never punished the perpetrators.  They lived in terrorist cells around the world funded by a CIA that has no civilian oversight and is primarily funded by the illegal drug trade across the globe, and they are desperate to keep Trump out of the White House.  So they found a Lily White in Mathew Crooks to kill Trump.  They tried to assassinate another president so they could control the White House through terrorism and political radicalism, which is the complete platform of the Communist Harris campaign.  But they missed Trump, and now they are exposed in ways they are unprepared to deal with.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Who Runs the American Government, a Representative Republic or Global Communists: Trying to kill Trump and putting Harris/Walz at the top of the ticket

It would not be a stretch to notice that the people behind putting Kamala Harris at the top of the ticket, removing Joe Biden from a second term as President, meant to bypass the primary process because they knew she would never survive.  And she wouldn’t survive because of her nature of being an outright communist who could not withstand the public scrutiny as an exposed Marxist.  That’s one of the reasons they have kept her in the background all this time.  You would not be crazy to observe that this was likely their plan to use Joe Biden as a distraction while they worked a communist asset to the left of Bernie Sanders as the alternate extended plan to be installed at the last minute.  Looking back in hindsight, it’s pretty clear what they have been doing, and that was confirmed when they selected Tim Walz as the vice president candidate.  These are two radical leftists that obviously are way outside the mainstream of American thought and could only be looked at as a coup of our election system.  The system itself is a Deep State mechanism that has no respect or even consideration of a publicly-run republic.  From their perspective, we do not have a representative government.  We are suckers who are being taken over by a global communist infiltration, and they are so audacious about it that right out in the open, they are putting forth Kamala and Walz as a couple of radicals poised to be installed in the White House.  And they no longer care if people accept it or not.  They intend to make it happen no matter what people think because they know they can control the election process ultimately, and if people protest, they will just get rid of them. 

That’s the only conclusion that could be made after the government got caught with its fingerprints all over the attempted Trump assassination.  Looking back over the months and years, and the way they have been trying to bankrupt people like Alex Jones and put people like White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon in jail, where he currently is—and setting up an assassination on President Trump by a kid who barely had a social media footprint and had a whole series of errors that put him on the roof of a Trump rally in Pennsylvania as a lone gunman to kill the president on live television.  What we have going on here is something nobody wants to admit, and it is evident in this whole approach to government by Kamala Harris and this communist sidekick, Tim Walz.  Nobody who respects our election process, the people’s will, would have put Tim on a ticket if they cared what people thought. Instead, we see people without respect for a representative republic working in the background to take over our society.  And they are not shy about it.  This is obvious when you hear about all the conditions that allowed the shooter at the Trump rally, Thomas Crooks, to act alone behind such a folly of errors that have been alarming in just how stupid some of the people heading security were.  Of course, the CIA denied any access to Crooks or any MK-Ultra program, and who could ever check them on it when the FBI was involved in the investigation of the Trump assassination attempt?  The FBI has been caught trying to perform several coups on President Trump themselves, most notably the Russian dossier that is now so famous and was completely made up by intelligence agencies.  The mode and attempt were nearly identical to the Kennedy assassination and, just as audacious, meant to instill a level of panic in society that would destroy any American resistance to an overt overthrow of our entire society.  So much was resting on that bullet hitting Trump in the side of the head.  But he moved, and they missed.  This has left the planners looking sheepish and forced them to carry out their sinister plans, even with Trump still being a viable candidate.  It was only a few days later that Joe Biden was removed from the top of the ticket and Kamala inserted without a primary process because, at this point, they were all too invested to turn back now. 

And that’s when we have to call it what it is.  To talk about the government as something else run by other people is wrong.  The government is us, the people of the United States.  But what we have going on in government are people who are prone to the seduction of communist thought who want to get into our representative republic and run it with the philosophy of Karl Marx, and they are willing to kill to do it.  They are eager to do anything to do it, especially in stealing elections, which has been a common practice for many years. After the audacity of picking the governor of Minnesota as a VP, nobody in their right mind would do that.  This means people without a right mind are controlling things in the background and are overtly applying a well-planned coup for an invasion of America at the political and financial level, and the three letter agencies are working for them out of self-preservation to maintain their pensions and government careers which they consider at a threat if the people put their representative back in the White House.  It’s not hard to see who the bad guys are and that they are so pompous in what they think captured government control will give them that they don’t care anymore what public perception is.  If we catch them trying to kill a president, they will just lie, force a few resignations, and then go back to the drawing board. 

The plan to sell communism to America is to offer up a Harris/Walz ticket that everyone knows would have never survived the primary process.  But a short sprint for the White House starting in August of 2024 with an openly Marxist ticket sold with smiles and laughter might work, just as influencing the kid Thomas Crooks to kill the president at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania did.  If they fail, which they most of the time do, they will deny everything, lie, and try again over and over because they have enough control over our representative government through pensions and easy jobs to get enough people to play ball at the expense of the quality of our government.  So it gets away from us, and we refer to it as “they” instead of “ours.”  But after these events in the summer of 2024, it can no longer be a dispute; we are dealing with a government captured by Marxists who are willing to do anything for their self-preservation, even to kill for it.  They will cheat in elections.  They will do anything they have to do to save their massive administrative state that is in service to a global Deep State.  The reason is that they have such good jobs, with such lavish pensions and unrealistic government service compensation, that they will do whatever they have to do to continue it at the expense of logic, sovereignty, and consideration for their friends and neighbors.  Government workers are paid too much to do too little, and for the laziest of our society, Marxism sounds wonderful, and they are Tim Walz types by the bucketloads.  And they think they have enough in society to keep it close under the illusion of a free election.  And what isn’t close they know they can cheat with digital machines and mail-in ballots.  But just remember, they are playing for keeps, and they are willing to put their targets in jail and kill them if they get in the way of their easy money under a communist government.  They know the American people are not with them but don’t care.  They will do their menace anyway to protect their pensions from any civil debate at reforms to a bloated, ostentatious government—expensive, dominating, and corrupt—and out of control as a team of assassins committed to communist, globalist causes.   The battle is over who runs our government, the people of America—or global communists.  The communists are betting that it’s them. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Why You Should Vote and Attend Jury Duty: The enemy wants you to sit down, shut up, and hide from all responsibility

Years ago, in a book I wrote called The Symposium of Justice, I had a detailed plot about a sinister global organization that used a kind of radio wave embedded in water towers to manipulate the pituitary gland of residents to control their minds in a commercial way.  It had attracted some attention from Hollywood, but by the time the Santa Monica Meat Grinders were done revising the story into the kind of movie they wanted to make of it, the story was completely changed, and I realized that it wasn’t science fiction, but fact.  This was before 5G technology and what we have since learned about the power that the NSA has.  However, the concept is the same: large, powerful, global organizations want to control people through technology.  And I thought of that as I have suddenly had a rash of people tell me they aren’t voting during this election because the system is so corrupt that it’s useless to them.  I’ve seen these patterns all my life, which is why I wrote the book I did.  I don’t think it’s an accident at all that some kinds of people are suddenly anti-voting. I have been in this business for a long time, and it has hardly ever come up.  Occasionally, you get a person here or there, but it’s not like this.  It’s as if some 5G broadcast was penetrating the minds of millions of people and discouraging them from participating in our republic.  Also, I have heard more than ever the word “democracy” instead of what we actually are, a “republic.”  Something is going on, and when I have seen this kind of thing in the past, I always look for some sinister organization that has figured out how to penetrate a brain with some radio wave that changes the decision-making of the recipients.  And with this voting thing, I think it’s just another form of election fraud, making people feel like their voice doesn’t matter, so they sit on the fence during a critical election, frustrating a participatory environment.

Several weeks ago, I reported for jury duty, and I showed up with the card they mailed me and joined about 100 other people in a big courtroom in Hamilton, Ohio.  I talked to a few people I knew there from different things and asked them immediately if they could get me out of the experience.  I told them I had work to do and couldn’t afford to spend so much time sitting in a courtroom.  The people I talked to recommended that I stick around and even volunteer to be the foreman.  They told me that I was precisely the kind of person who should be on a jury, with my love of law, order, justice, and all.  And that I would see why in a minute.  So from there, the judge overseeing this particular session of the grand jury selection asked out of all those 100 people for volunteers so that he would not have to compel anybody to be there.  After some hesitation, 15 hands went up.  He needed 9 for the grand jury and about five alternates.  So he had just a bit more than he needed for his grand jury.  And of course, I was one of the volunteers.  The judge put us all in the box and picked the alternates and once that was set, he let the rest of the people go, like fish caught and thrown back into the lake.  These people should have all been in the Olympics because they left at record speed to flee the courtroom and return back to their lives of normalcy, whatever that may have been.  They were gone much faster than they had come in. 

As I did my term as the foreman, I found the experience very rewarding.  I was selected for jury duty with the initial card because I voted so much.  I tend to vote for every election issue, so my name was in the hat for selection for that reason.   Many people in society don’t vote much, and they keep themselves out of processes like jury duty because they never have time.  And those who do get selected work to get out of it.  I could have gotten out of it.  But I have a life where I can manage everything.  I work 24 hours a day, so my life is not judged so much by a nine-to-five job or even an eight-to-four.  I certainly don’t work banker’s hours.  So I listened to what the people I knew at the courthouse told me, and I didn’t try to get out of jury duty, and I’m happy I had that experience.  Even though it was work and a lot of it was very unpleasant, I felt like much of it was something I could bring to the table that helped the community function better, and it was good to do.  But it was sad that our entire Republic depends on people participating in things like jury duty and voting to get your name in the hat.  We are not a democracy, as the communist losers from the left keep trying to call it.  We have a democratic process where majority votes select our government management systems.  But we are supposed to populate those roles with people committed to the task who represent us so we can do other things with our lives.  We don’t pick people to rule over us.

What was strange is that while I have been having this experience, I have heard from more and more people indicating that they weren’t going to vote, that Trump is part of the problem, and that they can’t bring themselves to participate.  And I wondered if there were nearby water towers with signals penetrating people’s brains run by the CIA, making them not want to vote so that the Deep State might get away with another stolen election.  I would advise everyone to fight through whatever is holding them back; their thoughts may not be their own.  But people who want to control your life may be trying to frustrate you by not participating so they can take it over.  That may sound like a science fiction consideration, but I have learned over the years that it’s more of a science fact than anything.  And I saw that same trait in that courtroom for jury duty.  People acted like they had something better to do than to be on a jury of their peers and shape society the way only good people can, with their direct input.  What were they rushing away to do, to watch a movie on Netflix?  Get milk at the store?  Complain about taxes?  I would advise everyone with those little doubts in the back of their mind to use that mind to overcome negative thoughts, especially about a participatory government.  Participate, go to jury duty, and make sure you vote.  Don’t sit on the sidelines because the bad guys are counting on you sitting out.  Into frustrating you from action and judgment.  They want our world to collapse from a lack of effort so they can rule over the remains, and they hope that a democracy of the mob will give them that power, not through force, but through laziness, apathy, and fear of relevancy.  These people wish to rule by making you think that none of it matters and that the way to conquer you is through a lack of participation.  It is not a frontal attack by an engaged community defending their republic one vote at a time.  And our form of government requires that good people show up, and participate.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Public Schools Need to Be Destroyed: They are communist concepts run by people like Jill Biden, and we need to get rid of them

Now that things are shaping up into reality for many Democrats, especially Jill Biden, the reality that President Trump will be returning to the White House is taking hold.  And Dr. Jill is worried that Trump will end public education as we know it.  Now, there is probably nobody on earth who loves education as much as I do.  I am perpetually learning; I read an average of three weekly books on various subjects because I love to learn.  Most people I know have advanced degrees and many times have multiple degrees.  They are primarily wealthy, too.  And a lot of them speak three or more languages.  I am not a fan of slack-jawed losers and dope-smoking hippies or people too lazy to get out of bed early each day and get the most out of a day.  But as I have said for many decades now, public education is a disaster.  Government-made education is a horrendous detriment that was ill-conceived in the beginning and has turned out to be a disaster for our society.  The teacher unions have destroyed the concept and ruined many children along the way, and the future of education cannot be public education.  It needs to be destroyed for the impediments it has imposed itself to our nation and lives.  Like a lot of things that progressives (communists trying to mask themselves in a free culture like America), their concepts of a centrally planned society vacant of individual achievement were wrong from the start.  And every generation that continues with this mess will be further destroyed intellectually, so time is of the essence.  When President Trump is restored to the White House, he needs to do what Ronald Reagan never had the guts to do, and that is to end the Department of Education, decentralize how education is performed with kids, and make sure that any tax money that goes into education goes to the child, and not a zip code brick and mortar school system.

I have been warning my local school system that the financial model for public education was going to have to change.  And why wouldn’t it?  What is good about public education?  When I was growing up, adults told me that what would matter to me were the friends I made, the school jackets, the class rings, and the sense of belonging that you get from the public school experience.  It would be about class reunions, the memories of learning things, and the friends you made along the way.  In reality, none of that matters.  In adult life, people revert their attention to their families and quickly forget about the people they went to school with.  Those high school years are of very little significance and certainly not worth the damage they do to a person trying to make them into social creatures.  That is not the natural state of a human being but a desired attribute of a centralized, planned society.  So, we have built this entire social system to implement the communism that was becoming fashionable in the late 1800s. The check is coming due to its monstrous failure on all human beings worldwide.  Public education has been a mess from Dewey’s beginning, and there are no prospects of that changing any time soon.  Under the labor unions that run these schools, it is communist ideology that they function from and teach to the students, which then ruins them for life.  And in most cases, that includes the people reading this right now.  Few people escape the damage done to them by public education because its foundation from the beginning was rotten. 

Of course, when we talk about communism, we are not being inflammatory; we are just using the correct words.  Marx and Engles’s ideas about communism were migrating around Europe through Masonic memberships, and they were being exported as dangerous ideas directly into churches, labor unions, and society memberships as Marxism, socialism, and progressivism to percolate around most thinking at the turn of the twentieth century.  Most people are so accustomed to these concepts that they don’t know anything else at this point.  So these are assumed traits, but they were never American.  Communism was the European fad, and it was exported worldwide.  As it moved as a philosophy into Russia and then down into China, they were calling it Democrat politics in America to soft sell it as something that could Trojan Horse it into our culture, which was taught in public education as its core foundation.  To prevent any competition of thought, the labor unions set the agenda, which was the net objective of communism.  So, at their core, what they were teaching children and society at large was outlined in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, and we are witnessing the danger across the world to this very day.  Luckily, there are some competitive alternatives in America, such as homeschooling and private schools.  And in the case of mass media culture, competing ideas can undo or overshadow the bad things learned in public education.  We are free to read, watch, and consume many other ideas, which is why our culture hasn’t failed.  However, the centralized model of public education has been a complete disaster with very little redeeming value to it.

Granted, when we designed a public education system, one of the reasonable goals was for people to learn the basics.   A person living in a very remote area such as the mountains of Colorado would learn to read, write, and gain basic social skills that would allow them to interact with someone from New York City with a standardized understanding of the world.  So public education isn’t all bad if looked at from that point of view.  But if that is the goal, there are other ways to get there.  To say that education is essential is an understatement.  However, public education, run by the same government that can do very little else right, is socially destructive and a menace to the furtherance of human civilization.   If communism is the foundation of all public education, then it’s rotten and needs to be tossed out.  Only free market ideas pushing each other to be better should be acceptable, and we must be bold enough to admit that.  I would say that education is the cornerstone of any advanced culture.  However, a centralized education cannot be driven and set by the government.  It needs free market applications that are much less prison-like and more designed to unlock the intellect of curious creatures before they lose their ability to grow at their critical age junctures.  Unfortunately, Most people don’t develop much beyond the age of 15, so a person’s intellect can be destroyed forever by whatever they have learned before that age.  So, with that in mind, we must make significant adjustments to our nation’s education policy.  For those reforms to occur, we have to admit to the massive disaster that public education has been causing for generations of people and stop destroying more generations.  We need to be bold and decentralize it completely.  Only then can we hope to see any improvements in our social intellect.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Attack Vector of Globalism: Immigration and drugs are their strategy to destroy America and make a ‘global citizen’

Of course, we have been at war for a long time, but not in the conventional sense.  Most of the wars, if not all of them, in the last century, even going back to the Civil War, were concoctions of finance, the tampering of globalism to destroy the concept of sovereign nations and create “united nations.”  The delivery method has been propaganda, not overt domination with ground troops the way wars have been traditionally fought and defined.  And when you understand the political leanings of finance, where the wives traditionally leaned far left and dabbled in the occult, the men followed their wives socially and lent themselves to progressive causes.  This is to say, there is some degree of global socialism as designed by Karl Marx baked into high finance societies.  And in high society, they contemplated what they thought people were or weren’t.  And when they turned their gaze to America, to destroy all concepts of nationalism in favor of global identity, they studied what had been done to the American Indian as the method to kill those who became members of the greatest nation on earth.  This is very obvious when the point of reference is westerns, such as Kevin Costner’s newest Western, Horizon, which is very good.  The Indians were hostile savages who were in the way of Manifest Destiny, and the Christian notion of destiny and rule-based fate are ideas that global communists chide against even today, including what they think they learned from Westward Expansion.  It’s important to understand that what these globalists are doing to America is purposeful and an act of war once you place yourself in their shoes and see the world somewhat as they do.  They do not like Americans.  They do like primitive people from all over the world because they make good subjects to rule over, so they tend to embrace societies that are tribal as opposed to inventive. 

They see how Americans flooded the West with immigrants after wave after wave of migrants continued to perpetually come.  No matter how fast the Indians killed off the settlers, they just kept coming until it wasn’t long before the Indians were gone, and the immigrants replaced an entire race of indigenous people.  That’s not how I see it, but it is how global communists (progressives) in high finance see it from their limited understanding of life in general.  The open border policies of globalists are only to be understood one way: as an attack on sovereign nations to change their country from one thing to another.  The open borders in America, for instance, is a military exercise meant to reverse what happened to the Indians by the Americans.  In the circles of high finance and the movement of the many sophists in the wives clubs of the early last century, permeating today into the various feminist movements and communist offshoots, the belief is that the way to beat America for its sins of the past, for its society built on slavery, is to kill them off the way they killed off the Indian, with wave after wave of immigration, until they are all outvoted, or gone by interbreeding.  Of course, there are lots of holes in this understanding of the world, and it’s very limited, but if you sit in most dinner conversations of high society, they think this is the objective view of history and the way to destroy those pesky American capitalists once and for all.  For what they did to the American Indians, they will have then turned back on them, and within a few generations, they will be destroyed from the face of the earth, forgotten by history.

The other thing that occurred during western expansion was that trade with Indians introduced them to alcohol, a poison that utterly ruined them.  Indians couldn’t deal with the requirements of their culture, leading to the very rapid demise of their men and, therefore, the ability to continue reproducing as heads of a family.  So, as Indians were killed off in battles and range wars, they could not replace their populations with a new generation because they were ruined and drunk. After years of casual study by a lot of communist-oriented history professors, they have analyzed the destruction of the American Indian down to these two objectives, and they have rolled those sentiments into this modern strategy of creating a global citizen, using what worked against the American Indian and applying it to the contemporary American and European.  You don’t see mass migration, for instance, going into China or Japan.  It’s only in areas of the world where finance is sponsoring social change for a military incursion, designed by the desire and need to create a United Nations global citizen.  The drugs flooding our border and culture, even down to the persistent trap to make marijuana legalized and normalized, are attempts to poison our youth culture outright and destroy any notion of a work ethic.  The amount and desire to use drugs and intoxicants of all kinds is a military objective that has been cast upon American society not as a pleasure but as a destructive element of chaos meant to destroy all traces of the Anglo-Saxon influence and Bible thumpers of Western civilization.  To see it, you must understand the people behind the bioweapon COVID-19, a proven fact with plenty of evidence.  But the evil intention is well beyond the scope of most trusting people.  The same desire to kill off entire races of people is behind permissive drug use, and they are using the fate of what was witnessed with the American Indian and alcoholism as their model for destruction presently.

The new movie Horizon captures the sentiment perfectly.  I’ve watched every Western movie made many times.  I’ve read books and studied history, and that film reminds me a lot of Teddy Roosevelt’s Winning the West books and Alen Eckert’s Frontiersman novels, which are some of my favorites ever written.  But you can see the impact of high finance in these modern stories, where Indians previously would have been referred to as “savages” because, compared to the immigrants of Western Expansion, they were hostile and vicious.  But in Horizon, they are always, at worst, referred to as “indigenous people.”  Politically, they would dare go no further because the globalist citizen movement behind all financial frontiers would not put up with any reference to “savages” when talking about Indians.  That’s how new wars are fought, and it happens over a long time.  But when you see films like Horizon and what ends up being cut together into a finished form and released to the public by a product of Hollywood like Kevin Costner, you get a good insight into the way that Hollywood lefties think about the matter and what they think ruined the Indians at the cruel hands of incoming immigrants. And you can almost hear the wine glasses banging at a dinner with George Soros and his little boy Alex as they fund the destruction of America with such thoughts about how the Indians were treated and how the white Anglo-Saxon deserves the same fate, and worse.  For anybody to just take it as anything but an act of war is criminal at this point.  The strategy is obvious: globalism is at war with the American citizens, and our government has not done its job in protecting our culture.  They have sponsored illegal immigration, hoping to replace our entire population with immigrants out of revenge for how America was settled to begin with.  Part of that strategy is to poison our culture with drugs and alcohol so that there is nothing left in a few decades to defend America but brain-dead slugs looking for their next hit of drugs to savor intoxication over the benefits of accomplishment.  It all started with an attack, not by tradition but by point of reference from a progressive culture that has as its objective global domination and a one-world rule.  These are the weapons of war from their minds of mayhem, as history has taught them, and they are utilizing them aggressively to this day.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Global Mafia Rule of The Octagon Group: “He who owns the gold, rules”

I think you’ll find that most people associated with group activity are drawn to the safety blanket of such community affiliation out of their insecurities.  For instance, one of the most influential people in the world and a financial powerhouse in America was J.P. Morgan Sr., a womanizer, a believer in astrology, and a passionate collector of art.  He was also very insecure about how big his nose was.  Many early bankers, such as Morgan, were socialists who were much more attracted to limited competition because it made their lives much easier than the chaos of the free market.  Much discussion about his professional and public life has been discussed because of who he is, but what he believes gets much less attention than how we have learned to report details of people’s lives.  Because we don’t want to be exposed ourselves, as reporters, we don’t often ask all the detailed questions.  But it was common among such people, the most powerful and influential in the world, to have deep personal insecurities that they hid behind various group affiliations.  So when you hear that these kinds of people, whether it’s the Morgans, the Rothschilds, or the Vanderbilts, pick your big family of strong influence, you’ll see some common traits that sound more like mafia bosses than normal church-going patrons on a Sunday afternoon. They find themselves in secret societies not because what they do is all that secret but because they wish to conceal a power they get from group affiliation from a general public they wish to rule over, to mask their insecurities.  They want to be elite compared to the ordinary person to provide that illusion to themselves through classic group consensus.  This is why I have said that the organized crime mobs moved from the power that the sudden invention of mass communication and transportation gave them and migrated into government.  Because that’s where the power was.  For instance, in Morgan’s case, or any of them thinking of starting a Federal Reserve in 1910, their primary interest was using the government to cover loans they made to various countries.  How else could they recover funds owed to them but take over the government and use that power to collect when people, or other countries, stiffed them? 

In many ways, we have all assumed that everyone in the world played by and respected our Constitutional rules in America.  However, from the point of view of the globalist power broker who is deeply involved in international business, the rules were for thee, but not for me, as a general social position.  To swallow that pill, they would belong to various groups, such as Masons, and seek protection from the spirit world in secret societies, which is how membership into the largest and most secretive came to be for some and why it’s still a problem today, which hides a lot of organized crime.  And that is essentially how and why there is a group called the Octagon Group, which makes up an ultra-secret globalist network based out of Switzerland and comprises influential Catholic and Jewish families whose lineage traces back to the Egyptian Pharaohs.  It is the wealthiest, most deadly, and most technologically advanced mafia in the world, which umbrellas hundreds of other organizations and has the shape of an 8-sided logo as a symbol.  For instance, one of the most public expressions of their power is the Dome of the Rock at Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem.  The conflict there between Islam, the Christians, and the Jews is an artificial construct meant to control public sentiment and keep political tensions from allowing the public at large to get too close to their actual clandestine actions.  It’s a turf war essentially between the global mafia and ordinary people who will enable themselves to be divided into various religious factions controlled by these personalities.

It’s not like membership in this club has a charter and a chain of command that the public would understand.  Most of the membership happens by default rather than a conscious decision.  But when we talk about the Knights of Malta, the Khazarian Mafia, the Nazis, the World Economic Forum, the Jesuits, the Masons, the Black Nobility, the Vatican, the Rothschilds, the Morgans, the British Empire, the Black Pope, even the Roman Empire as it was created and implemented, then studied over the years, it all traces back to this membership of the Octagon Group. Around the world, the eight sides of their logo represent the eight main cities of their control, such as Rome, Jerusalem, Washington D.C., Munich, London, Zurich, Geneva, and Bern.  Notice the names of cities not on this list, such as Beijing, Delhi, Tokyo, or even Moscow.  When you pull away all the curtains as to how mob mentality has ruled the world, most of it traces back to this international mob of the Octagon Group operating out of these eight primary cities and using the mask of traditional governments as their personal collection agencies to be the heavies of their international funding operations.  To play the game, you have to be a member.   Otherwise, they use the power of governments they control to destroy all challengers.  The members join out of self-interest to rule the world from the shadows.  But they aren’t any better than anybody else.  They are prone to acquire power and money and protect their gains through globalist affiliations under the umbrella of the Octagon Group.  And before you say such a thing is crazy, remember, there is a giant obelisk from ancient Egypt in the middle of America’s capital, hiding in plain sight.  It’s hardly a conspiracy theory; it’s right out in the open. 

People not so obsessed with power and control, which under any other conditions would be considered a mental illness, generally want to live their lives, do what they need to to make a living, and can live and let live when it comes to other people.  But the members of these massive globalist mobs who have grown over time to control the entire finance industry and used the power of government to collect on debts owed to them generally have a few screws loose that don’t get analyzed commonly because the scrutiny would come from the same people seeking jobs and employment.  So, people typically look the other way, hoping that they might profit from the discretion.  That’s how such groups have gained power over society in general, which they don’t deserve to have.  It’s also why they believe they don’t have to obey any laws in America and that they function above and beyond governments. Technically, they view the government as their direct employees, not public representatives.  The public serves them as elite members of society, as do the governments they pick for their representation.  Until recently, these members of the Octagon Group hid their behavior behind the typical ring knockers of the military, who believe in rigid social constructs in society that are not merit-based but built to support social mechanisms rooted in aristocratic rule.  They don’t respect American independence from this structure.  They used American independence to topple kingdoms in Europe for their own needs of control.  But never forget, “he who owns the gold rules.”  And if you don’t control the gold, you don’t rule.  Whoever controls the monetary policy of a society is the ruler of that society, and this collection of various social mobs under the Octagon Group are the characters behind globalism.  They expected the governments to dance at their feet, as was the case, starting with Grover Cleveland in America and migrating through the Roosevelt, Taft, and then Wilson administrations.  After that, they were all too deeply embedded to stop traditionally.  The governments of the world became the captured assets we see today and are being smoked out by populism.  But their expectations to maintain their authority are pretty audacious.  They picked their guy in Biden because he was an excellent stooge for their movement.  But it’s coming unraveled as we speak, and panic is deep in their ranks on a global scale.  And it couldn’t happen to a better group of people and their mafia of discontent.  They have been controlling the money of the world.  But they are losing control now, and justifiably so.  If you want to end their rule, get control of your money management.  Otherwise, these destructive secret societies will continue to rule without any challenges to their authority.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Supreme Court’s Ruling on Bump Stocks: Without unregulated gun ownership, you can’t have a civil society

Here’s the deal, everyone: gun control is not a thing.  Restricting people’s access to guns by government controls is never going to be a thing in America.  The Bump Stock Ban that was initiated by President Trump during his term, as a bone to the communist left, is an excellent example as the Supreme Court ruled against the banning of the device that simulates automatic fire from semi-automatic weapons, as used in the Las Vegas shooting where innocent concert dwellers were pummeled with gunfire, and many were killed needlessly.  Immediately in reaction to the shooting, the communist left was looking for gun control legislation and a rules-based attack on the Second Amendment, and President Trump caved, thinking that if he threw them a bone, they’d be happy and go away.  That is how we have ended up with a lot of dumb laws and legal interpretations over the years and how the communist left has sought to undermine our entire society.  News flash, we don’t want to be like those crappy European countries, or like Australia, New Zealand, or any country that has lots of gun laws and bans on weapons.  It doesn’t surprise me that the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to leave the ban because the Second Amendment isn’t there as a right granted to the public; it’s there to limit the government’s powers over the people.  And we know now, more than ever, that the government is far more dangerous than guns in society.  Without guns, the government spirals out of control detrimentally, and corruption is soon to follow because they don’t fear the people.  The government needs to fear the people they work for.  Without guns, there is no respect because the government has all the power.  Guns are essential to keep all the human temptations toward sinful behavior regulated not out of respect but out of self-preservation.  And that Supreme Court finally gets it, as they are ruling on more issues that are just as logical.

All mass shootings need to be investigated as actions of government involvement.  Much like they did with the Kennedy assassination, where they pick a loner with all kinds of crazy thoughts and steer them through various means toward an action they want done, is a common problem.  The FBI has a lot to answer to, as does the CIA.  They have a lot to explain about the Las Vegas shooter, which they have never bothered with.  They can’t be trusted to order a pizza, let alone investigate mass shootings, which they often have their hands all over, hoping to create mass carnage in hopes that people will be scared into voting for more gun control.  We have seen ruthlessness of all governments, especially in the United States in recent years, that demonstrates a willingness to kill innocent people to advance political narratives.  And when it comes to all mass shootings, most of the time, they are not so spontaneous.  A tip-off trail is usually there for all to see, such as the trans shooter in Nashville.  But nobody ever stops the event from happening, and immediately after the shooting, we have the communist left demanding more gun control as if we could trust a centralized government that was behind such atrocities, such as COVID-19, for instance, with our very lives.  No thanks; we don’t need the government to act like our long-lost parents.  Just build highways, have a military, issue our driver’s licenses, and shut the hell up and mind your own business.  We don’t want kings and aristocrats ruling over us and deciding what we can and cannot have.  And we need guns to make sure the government doesn’t feel like it can get too pushy.  Because when they think people don’t have guns, they always, 100% of the time, abuse their power.

And this Bump Stock thing was a Trump deal, and people were still against it.  Yes, people still support Trump and will happily vote for him again.  But from the beginning, we knew the Supreme Court would rule this way because it’s the only way to rule.  Only an activist court not following the Constitution would think otherwise.  All these other armpit countries out there in the world would do a lot better if they had a set of laws like we do in the United States, with our Constitution.  However, we have a Constitution in America, and the Second Amendment is one of the critical foundations of law that cannot be tampered with.  Bump Stocks and much more must be available to a population to keep the government from getting too far over their skis in grabs for power.  Just because President Trump supported the ban doesn’t mean people unthinkingly follow some leaders.  Trump got it wrong, as he got a lot of things wrong.  He was suckered by the communist left, in much the way that Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates suckered him over the Covid bioweapon.  It wasn’t just January 6th that was an inside job; most public violence is caused by the government, in service to the government, to trick people into giving the government more power.  And when those same people suckered Trump, most of the public understood what was happening.  That’s why we have a Supreme Court, to provide a backstop to much of this unconstitutional insanity by hostile agents of big government loons seeking problems to advance their social menace. 

Philosophically speaking, I don’t think you can have a civil society without a heavily armed public.  The Second Amendment was never meant for hunting.  It was meant to keep humanity’s greed in check as they moved into government positions and had to stave off the temptations to abuse their power.  There has never been an instance in human history where too much power in the hands of government worked out for the people being governed.  The United States was never created to be like other countries; it was meant to be unique, so we have always been reluctant to get involved in other people’s wars.  We are isolationists because the rest of the world is too stupid to push away their governments and demand their freedom from the tyranny of the corrupt.  We’re talking about the same world that killed Socrates for corrupting the youth.  Who conspired to kill Julius Caesar by insurrectionists in the senate.  And conspirators who killed Jesus Christ just for existing.  It’s not an accident that America has the highest GDP in the world; it’s because the government hasn’t been allowed to stop people’s ambitions in life.  And you can bet, without the Second Amendment, that America would be like they tried to make it with Covid, a power-hungry government that would seek to micromanage the whole world and get in the way of everything, and attempt to rule through fear wherever possible.  An unarmed society would be a victim to government under such conditions, and the only reason we have not yet fallen to such a fate is because we have the Second Amendment.  Because there are more guns than people, and the largest army in the world is the private one shared by property ownership by American citizens.  So it’s great that the Supreme Court saw the obvious.  But that’s just the tip of an iceberg of rulings that must be turned the other way because they were created without the Constitution to limit the government’s powers.  And that’s just how it is and will continue to be. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The New Mob is No Different than the Old Mob: The bigger the government, the more mobsters there are to exploit it

Organized crime never went away; it just moved into the globalist movement. The old mobsters like Moe Dalitz from Cleveland and Screw Andrews from Cincinnati are now Larry Fink, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerburg. When people get a lot of money and use it to buy our government, it’s all the same game of corruption.  What we have witnessed with the advent of technology is that the lazy, the corrupt, the malicious, and outright evil people of the world still rally together to use mass to exploit easy living for themselves through crime and jeopardy.  Just as during western expansion, Jesse James and the gang would gather with force to rob a bank or hold up a train and steal the wealth from the inhabitants.  Mobsters always sought ways to profit off sin to exploit an endeavor, and what we see happening now globally is no different.  Technology and travel allowed them to do so on larger scales, along with centralized banking.  In other words, the bigger the government and the more organized it is, the more tempting the target is to exploit to acquire wealth as quickly as possible.  So, of course, governments would be targets for mobster activities.  Why would you hold up victims on a train when you can use the power of the government to do it for you?  All you have to do is control the government, and that is the easy part because there are always whores of some kind looking for an easy buck.  Living in Cincinnati, I have had a front-row seat to some of this mobster behavior.  Some of the biggest mobsters of their time spent a lot of time in Cincinnati and Newport, Kentucky, because it was such a centralized hub within the country.  Like anywhere where there is a lot of money; of course, organized crime elements would grow to exploit it as much as possible, which they did. 

I think it was very fortunate that I grew up the way I did.  I have always had a bold personality, and there was never a part of my life where I faced some ramifications for having it.  Instead, I have lived a vibrant life full of massive experiences.  And when danger and dollars were put before me to see if I dared take them, I was always yearning for the opportunities that came with both.  Not so good for the crime, and of course, that caused rifts that led to violence.  Which I was always perfectly fine with.  I enjoyed it.  If I could be said to have an addiction of some kind, it would be danger and it took me many years to find good ways to satisfy that part of my nature.  It’s a topic that came up in a conversation I had where someone asked me how many times I have had a gun pulled on me because they expected the answer to be zero.  Instead, I had to think about it and realized I couldn’t count them all.  It’s not like it was every day, but it was so often that I couldn’t think of them all, even after several days.  Whenever I came up with a number over twenty, I thought of new times.  And for me, it was never a regrettable experience but an excellent opportunity that made my life better as a result.  So, I don’t look back on those experiences with apprehension, but conquerable moments that made me better.  I learned firsthand that mobsters were not as brutal or scary as portrayed in the movies. Instead, at their core, they relied on group affiliation to fill in insecurities in their public lives that led to easy money because they were essentially lazy.  Their only power was fear and the ability to manipulate other people with even less courage than they had.  People sell themselves to the “take” way too easily, and often.   

Naturally, as our world grew smaller with technology and transportation, those types of people sought to exploit more people easily with a centralized government.  The old mob guys, and I met several of them in Cincinnati, mainly when I worked as a busboy at the Mike Fink restaurant on the Ohio River, was no different from the billionaires and manipulators of the world today, such as Larry Fink, Bill Gates, and Klause Schwab.  People who met Moe Dalitz from the Cleveland Four would think of him as a very charitable person involved in many front groups that everyone would recognize.  He was a trendy guy who would essentially become Mr. Las Vegas.  But he was still a thug, just as Larry Fink of BlackRock is today.  They run front organizations that give them the appearance of legitimacy.  But they made their money off the crimes of their mobster behavior, organized crime.  The activity of washing money through Ukraine by starting wars and profiting off the misery would classify as a classic mobster endeavor.  The only reason they used to be regional is that the technology and transportation at the time kept them from getting too far from a central location.  Back in the period known as the golden age of mob behavior, from the 1920s through the 1960s, planes were more challenging to get around the earth as fast as they can today, and cars were big and slow.  There weren’t highways like we have these days where you can be in another state within five hours of traveling all day, seven days a week.  Now, mobster types can hide in the mountains of Davos with all the other international gangs, such as the Khazarian Mafia, the Knights of Malta, The Jesuits, and the World Economic Forum.  Because of technology, those people have found each other easier and aligned for their crimes against humanity, which is in their nature to do.  I only mentioned my experience because I know better and understand the thinking that attracts those people to do what they do.  And why they point guns at people, hoping to use force to gain compliance. 

I also learned that the only thing those people understand is force.  They don’t respect sympathy or pleading.  They only understand force.  I’m still around to tell some of these stories because of force.  The secret to understanding this realization is that they join mobs for the same reason people join labor unions: they hope to collectively bargain for an easier life that pays them the most.  They want as much money as possible by doing as little as they can get by earning it.  And joining a mob, whether the racket is hustling girls, gambling, or bootlegging, or whether it’s drug trafficking, stealing tax money through front group organizations that get sizable grants from the government, and the kickbacks flow into the pockets of those granting the money.  Wherever there is a lot of money and access, there will be some organized crime element to exploit it and the people in the way of getting it. And there is no appeal to their “better” natures.  They will do anything to acquire easy money.  And demonizing cash doesn’t stop the behavior.  Only force manages such thugs.  There is no way to use bigger government to protect yourself from their attempts at organized crime, which Big Pharma is only a modern version of the kind of businesses that Moe Dalitz used to run.  The bigger and more powerful government only makes it easier for more mob types to exploit innocent people for their desires to gain power and money as quickly as possible, which is at the core of everything BlackRock does in the world from a money management standpoint.  And they are no different than what the old mobsters of memory did every day.  The only difference is that technology allows them to do it on a bigger scale, and our understanding of those scales is just catching up to reality.   

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Government is Not Our Boss: The lazy way they manage society with low engagment

I’m not the kind of person who doesn’t like jury duty.  I get a lot of notifications wanting me to do it because I vote for everything.  But I don’t ever get picked; nobody wants me once they realize how opinionated and firm I am in my beliefs.  I consider jury duty a privilege, and I always want to do it.  I’d do them every day if I could because I love law and think working on our issues of crime and punishment would be one of the highest benefits of any high society.  But recently, when I received my latest notification, the whole experience instantly turned me off.  Who writes these things, and who do they think they are?  When they notify you of jury duty, they are so negative and assume that you will be a problem that they instantly turn toward authority dictatorship to drive compliance with their summons.  The first line of their notification to me is, “You are commanded to appear and be available to serve.” Who do they think they are?  Deeper into their notification, they say, “Employers are prohibited from discharging or threatening,” and “if a juror fails to attend,” the court may impose a fine.  No wonder the government has so many problems.  They need to learn some hard lessons about engagement because if that is their default mode, which it is, no wonder they don’t get cooperation from people in a free society.  For a person like me who wants to do these things, that kind of language instantly makes me want to go in the opposite direction.  Nobody commands me to do anything.  The government doesn’t supersede my liberties and cannot compel me to be a part of their ill schemes and detriments. 

This is the general problem with the government and the kind of people drawn to work for it.  The power to compel people randomly and without thought to incursions into their personal lives is disrespectful at best.  To assume that people can rearrange their lives under the compulsion of the court is the wrong approach to what should be willing civil service.  People should want to serve on jury duty.  They should not have to be compelled to do so.  And this assumption that the needs of the court are more significant than the needs of an individual is preposterously horrendous.  That basic premise misses the point of all government.  Government serves us, we do not serve the government.  Notifications like that jury duty utterance show that the government does not know its place and never did.  They started wrong and just continued regardless of what sanity said.  The assumption that society is a low-engagement enterprise that must be ushered around like children fearful of their parents is the first problem in a long list that always leads to the failures of mass society. The power of government to compel people to do things they would never want to do on their own.  Using government power to force people against their will out of fear of punishment is the core of all government trouble.  Then, we are supposed to want to pay more compelled taxes toward a government that grows bigger and more powerful with every dollar they steal from us.  This whole arrangement with the governed is a rat’s nest of irony.  It’s lazy and presumptuous and gives the worst in our society, the most insecure, instant ability with the power of government that assumes it has rights over people it does not have.  “You are commanded?”  That is the wrong choice of words; the government works for us, not the other way around.

Many studies have been done over the last several years on engagement and why people engage in activity by choice.  The cell phone revolution is one of those successful exchanges of how choice motivates behavior.  I grew up in a time when nobody had a cell phone.  I have watched them become as common as shoes; nobody would have ever thought so when they were first invented.  What started as a series of released conspiracies about how the government wanted to survey the actions of all people everywhere with a chip embedded in them, during the 1980s and 90s became cell phones that would track everything we do and spy on us by choice.  We take cell phones wherever we go because we enjoy the companionship.  These days, I am never anywhere where I don’t see a cell phone interacting with a person even when real people are present.  People would rather interact with their cell phones, even during dinner conversations.  That is because the cell phone is polite and offers at least some illusions of choice, and people prefer that option over some dictator presentation.  Cell phone companies figured out how to get high engagement out of their customers by giving them freedom of choice over a long period.  Or at least the veil of choice.  If the goal is to track people and spy on their every movement, then cell phone companies figured out how to get mass society to choose for such an arrangement by the illusion of choice.  All successful enterprises work out some mix of choices to inspire people to engage with their offerings.  That is the key to all advertising, so it’s not like human beings don’t understand the art of engagement.

The government, however, is too lazy even to go that far.  Instead, when they want to accomplish something, they must rely on mass collectivism to inspire fear and drive public engagement.  Whether it’s a case of eminent domain or the draft, the government leans on force to drive participation, the fear of what might happen to you if you do not participate.  But for that to work, they must be bigger and more powerful than you to inspire enough fear that you will be compelled to comply for self-preservation.  That is not how civil service should communicate with people about any issue.  It should be a privilege that people want to participate in willingly.  It’s not something they do because they fear penalties.  No wonder so many people want to get out of jury duty.  And those who serve are not the sharpest tacks in the box because they have nothing else going on.  Who wants to be judged by a jury of their peers when their peers are too fearful to fight back against the compulsion of jury duty?  But rather is some brain-dead slug that doesn’t have a complicated enough life to get out of jury duty.  And then, they survive the lawyers and get picked for jury selection by a top-down parental government that doesn’t respect their time or individuality.  And that all lives must stop for the slow speed of the government.  There is a lot wrong with that simple jury notification.  I would choose to be on a jury every day if I could.  But the way the government asks me to do it makes me want to go in the opposite direction.  The government is lazy and relies on force to impose itself on the people it is supposed to serve.  No wonder the government is always so screwed up.  But it’s by choice, not by science.  They could do better if they wanted to.  But because of the government’s power over people, they don’t feel motivated to do so.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707