This is how you deal with the political left—you have to get in their face and let them know that you are smarter than they are. Their favorite—and really only weapon is that they feel they have the masses behind them trained through academic institutions that they currently control. They behave with all things with an aristocratic air that they use as a club to shut people up and push conservatives into the corners reeling for help. But just study what one guy from Breitbart did to The Daily Show crew at the RNC convention. This is how you defeat lefties ladies and gentlemen. Way to go Breitbart!
It is unbelievable that so many establishment types had a hard time with Ben Carson’s speech at the RNC in Cleveland where he tied Hillary Clinton to Lucifer. I think I was most baffled by Dana Parino from Fox News who thought it was an “over-the-top” comparison. No wonder Republicans have been losing to the inferior philosophical outlook of the political left for such a long time—because they avoid confronting evil even in words and deeds. There was nothing “inflammatory” or “conspiratorial” about what Ben Carson said—everything is factually based. Watch for yourself.
It is true that Hillary idolized Saul Alinsky and wrote here college thesis on the radical leftist who did indeed study his methods of organizing change agents from within the ranks of Al Capone’s criminal empire. His associations with known mobsters led to his pinnacle work—the Democratic handbook, Rules for Radicals which Hillary was very enchanted with—and on the dedication page, Alinsky did dedicate the book to Lucifer—literally. The book was forged from evil and organized crime. Fact. There is nothing “inflammatory” about it such a statement. It’s all true. You’d think that even Republican insiders who actually have worked in the White House would know that. But what they do when they criticize Carson for bringing up such an extraordinary fact about a person running for president of the United States is they play right into the methods Saul Alinsky taught his students—that the best way for evil to thrive is to force good people to shut up and sit down with all known methods of coercion—which is how the mob operated for years—and still does in some places.
Ben did a good job in bringing up the Hillary comparison to Lucifer at the RNC because it is relevant to this situation. The first method of breaking an addiction is in admitting that you have a problem. Republicans have been addicted to losing for a long time to the sheer face of evil—by not challenging that evil when confronted with it. Republicans have turned away from the workings of evil like timid varmints about to be consumed by a vile snake trapped on a high perch for which they can never step off to escape. The snake knows that Republicans cannot step off their high ground so they use that fear to control the thinking of Republicans and have used that strategic imposition to essentially spread evil in the vacancy of justice. That is essentially what Rules for Radicals teaches and what more could you expect from a book dedicated to Lucifer.
On Monday June 20th 2016 a host of senate democrats attempted to use the Orlando shooting to pressure GOP leadership into gun control measures on Capital Hill. Of course, thankfully because of the Republican majority and the powerful NRA their four proposals are going nowhere. But they’ll keep trying just like their buddy Leland Yee has for years out in California. The potential attempt had me fueled into a fired up fissure on Saturday when my friend Matt Clark brought up the topic of gun control up on his WAAM radio show. I had to call at the 30 minute mark and join the vigorous conversation Matt was hosting.
During the call I brought up the news story shown below, where liberal Leland Yee—a gun control champion in California was busted for trafficking in “foreign firearms” on the black market. Go ahead, read the article for yourself below from The Washington Post:
On the surface, the story of Leland Yee looks like a precipitous fall from grace.
The 67-year-old had risen steadily in the ranks of Bay Area politics since the late 80s, when he was elected to the San Francisco School Board. He then went on to sit on the city’s Board of Supervisors and in the state Assembly. The latter role saw him become the first Asian American speaker pro tem in 2004, making him the second-highest ranking Democrat in the California assembly at the time.
From 2006 onwards, Yee served as a state senator and was plotting a secretary of state campaign when his political visions were curtailed by a federal indictment in March 2014.
The arrest swept Yee and his associate Keith Jackson, 51, up in charges alongside some of the city’s most notorious characters, notable among them Chinatown gangster Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow.
Yee also discussed buying weapons overseas and bringing them to the U.S. with two associates and an undercover agent. He accepted $6,800 and a list of arms for purchase in the Philippines.
The maneuvers were not only illegal, but also in stark contrast to what he had long purported to stand for.
Yee told CBS two years before he was arrested: “It is extremely important that individuals in the state of California do not own assault weapons. I mean that is just so crystal clear — there is no debate, no discussion.”
The calamitous epilogue to Yee’s career, then, seems to be an abrupt about-face. During his campaigns, Yee had styled himself as an outsider removed from the corruption that plagued San Francisco governments past.
“My parents didn’t encourage me to go into politics at all,” he told Hyphen magazine in 2011. “There was a stereotype in the Chinese community that sees politics with suspicion. Politicians aren’t honorable, they’re corrupt and unsavory.”
Some members of the public have expressed disappointment over his conviction, but many more think the five-year sentence is fair (if not too light) for someone who has admitted to abusing his position.
Let me just say this much, there are no circumstances where more government equates to more prosperity. By nature, human beings fail when they have too much power and Leland Yee is a fine example of the same type of corruption we are learning about in Brazil, Venezuela and everywhere that socialism is the political philosophy of the masses. America must have guns—unlimited guns—so that our society can have the means to keep government from becoming all-powerful and ultimately following in the footsteps of liberals like Leland Yee. Every gun grabbing politician speaking to federal representatives in the wake of the Orlando massacre are potential Leland Yees. Many of them may be well-intentioned people, but all of them have the potential to become like Yee. What makes America different is that we do have guns, and we can if there is no other option; use them to protect ourselves from an out-of-control government. And by the sound of things now, it would seem that we are almost out of other options.
That professor, Helmut Norpoth, says his statistical forecast model shows the Manhattan mogul’s chances of beating Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton are at 97 percent, while his chances of defeating Bernie Sanders are at 99 percent. Overall, the model predicts that there is a 61 percent chance that a Republican will win the White House in November.
Norpoth, who announced his model’s results earlier this week, says his model is very accurate — and has been for 104 years. The statistical model, which uses a candidate’s performance in their party’s primary in addition to electoral cycle patterns, has correctly predicted the general election outcome for every presidential election dating back to 1912.
The only presidential candidate—actually–the only person running for any office to provide a plan to defeat ISIS has been Donald Trump. So when it comes to this November’s election, Donald Trump represents an actual answer to this terrorist problem—as opposed to perpetual news coverage and a feeling of victimization that is never-ending. People like me voting in this election expect results and Trump is the only one promising any. That makes him the only possible pick.
Hillary and her former boss, Barack Obama have created ISIS due to their administration policies of spreading the Islamic caliphate around the Mediterranean. I don’t think they intentionally created ISIS, but that they just mismanaged the situation due to their radical hatred of American sovereignty and foreign intervention in the Middle East region. Regardless, the trouble in the United States with increasingly persistent radical Muslim ideologies falls right on the doorsteps of the White House and Hillary was a part of that creation. That will pretty much destroy Hillary’s campaign now that this terrorist event has happened a few months before the presidential election.
At the beginning of the week of June 12th 2016 Trump plans a breakdown of Hillary Clinton and why she is not fit to be president of the United States. He had an easy job before this shooting, but now it is much easier for him. ISIS is Hillary’s baby as Secretary of State and now they have brought blood to the homeland she wants to lead. The election will go to Trump and when he wins, the first advisable thing to do would be to scoop up every terrorist sympathizer and put them on lock down. This should happen before we all have to go through the pain of increased TSA, NSA and FBI investigations giving up more of our freedoms, the groups who actually cause all these problems should be the first to have their rights trampled for the security of our nation. It’s not Christians doing these shootings, and it’s not Confederate Flag waving intolerant southerners. It’s radical Islamic terrorists homegrown in this case, but inspired by foreign insurgents who have in the past had the sympathies of the White House.
We either deport these people or we go to war with them in the streets of America. There aren’t any other options. Donald Trump’s solution may not be “politically correct.” It may go against “The Law Of One,” which secret society types, one world order maniacs, and political losers like Mitt Romney are so committed to—but I’m not, and neither is Donald Trump—and many others of us who are sick of these mismanaged events caused by stupid politicians who believe all the wrong things. I don’t believe in “The Law of One.” So scoop up the terrorists and all those Islamic idiots who say crazy things on Facebook and either deport them, or lock them up. We are at war and when we sort everything out, we can figure out how to integrate them back into society. But first, we need to send a message to ISIS—swiftly. And we can’t care whose feelings get hurt along the way. It doesn’t matter. The people causing all the trouble are the ones who need to feel the pain. And of all the people who are in positions of leadership, the only one with a plan is Donald Trump. I simply can’t wait for him to take office.
The media set the stage and our current political system has cast the insurrection—so what happens now is their fault. The people in the following video and those like them are not Americans—they are invaders provoked by progressives to overtake us all and attack our way of life. At the now famous Trump rally in San Jose, California you can see dear reader how bad the situation really is. A Trump supporter ganged up on badly stood her ground the way a fan might at a typical football game when surrounded by supporters of the opposite team. But what happened to her is a hint of the intentions of these insurgents. This is the video the news media did not show you—it was of her being egged violently and spit on by a mob of illegal immigrant supporters built by the open border policies instituted by those around the world—including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton—to end American sovereignty and our economical means of capitalism. They are the ones who declared war. Most of us have been very kind up to this point.
Of course we’d all be stupid to take this laying down and to just surrender ourselves to these angry mobs. It is my hope that a Donald Trump election will further root out the insurgents and help set the course of the country back toward success. But you have to understand, the people behind this movement are thieves and extreme liars—just look what Kati Couric did just the other day with her video against gun owners, or the State Department against James Rosen at Fox News. They will do anything to advance their progressive agenda and when something challenges them, they resort to violence such as they did in San Jose at the Trump rally. Or they resort to criminal acts to hide their acts even at the highest levels, and they don’t care because the media is eating out of the palm of their hands. This criminal action is clearly mainstream now, the evidence is all around us—just look at these videos from stories done the exact same week as the San Jose protests.
This November election may be the last one we have without actual warfare occurring between the insurgents and the residents formed in America under the United States Constitution. It is my hope that the election will solve the issue. But don’t be naive. Violence will occur because the political left has no other recourse. What they don’t expect is for the good people of America to stand up for themselves—which they are about to learn—is going to happen—just like that young lady did in the Trump jersey as she was harassed. If she had not been standing in front of a Marriott in a nice neighborhood within America with hundreds of cameras recording every incident, if that mob had been in Venezuela, Mexico City or anywhere in the Middle East, she would have been raped repeatedly and butchered violently. These are the villains we are dealing with, and they are now in our country trying to take it over with sheer force. And we just can’t let that happen. Hopefully, an election will solve the problem. But if that doesn’t work, we will have to dish it out instead of just taking it. These vile idiots will be coming to your back yard soon no matter where you live—and this is what they are really like.
One of the reasons the political left is so obsessed with skin color is because they like to hide their misdeeds behind racism. But they don’t like to talk about people from other places around the world who come to America but have difficulty merging with the freedom tendencies of our culture. Failures who come from more collectivist based cultures who don’t assimilate well such as Mainak Sarkar, an Indian guy at UCLA who shot his professor while in class, are typically ignored by the media because they don’t advance progressivism. So here is a picture of him allowing the image to speak thousands of words of explanation.
As much as the political left makes fun of people who wear cowboy hats, drive pick-up trucks, and tend to thump the Bible adhering to traditional values–the typically “white” males usually associated with “redneck” culture are not the ones doing all the mass shootings and having a hard time living in America. It’s creations of the political left who have all the trouble–and thus, the fault for the UCLA shootings resides squarely on their shoulders.
While I was on the air with Matt Clark during his WAAM radio broadcast recently he wanted me to talk a bit about my latest Curse of Fort Seven Mile series. However, time ran out and we couldn’t get into the details. Actually, I don’t think I could cover all the details in an hour show, or a 10 hour show. For me, what started as a simple pulp fiction series has evolved into something I would term as a philosophy for the 22nd century. The below videos will help with the context but essentially what I’m doing is this: over the next one hundred years we are going to discover that we are not alone in the solar system, let alone the galaxy. We will learn to defy death. We will unlock all the potentials of a Type 1 civilization and that will require us to completely revisit our current political and religious philosophies—because the present ones just won’t be sufficient. That’s not a knock on anybody, but the discoveries of the next century will just unlock a massive amount of potential that isn’t even forecasted on the horizon as of yet—and people will need some means of thinking about those things if they want to survive.
I have been pretty adamant about my hobbies and positions. I essentially grew up studying mythologies and religious cultures, but I like to make money, so I chose professional endeavors that I could raise a family on—but there is a lot about me that is very sympathetic to the Nathan Drake video game character. The people I most admire these days are people like Josh Gates and his friend Erin Ryder. If I did not love family as much as I do, I would have loved to live the life that they have—and believe me I have no regrets. But I do read and watch a lot of what those fantastic people have put out as far as discovery over the years. When they tackle some crypto mystery much of it comes out to nothing, but it’s the asking of the questions that I find absolutely amazing. There are a lot of people, many whom are featured in these videos who have committed enormous amounts of time and resources to asking hard questions about mankind’s origins—and I’ll be honest—I love each and every one of them. When I listen to their lectures and read their books I think in the best case scenarios, they may be getting 50% of any given idea correct. But even 1% of what these people are saying they are major game changers for the entire human race and the world at large.
Lately, there has been an explosion, likely because of the Internet, of conspiracy theories and examinations into a hidden past that does not agree with the Leaky evolutionary theories. The latest revisions are probably driven more by Jurassic Park’s DNA examples and the popular Lord of the Rings movies about Middle Earth—art has helped our society ask new questions from a fresh perspective—and the answers to those questions might just be explosive. If only 1% is true, mankind is in for some startling revelations. The best movies and books are the ones that make you ask, “what if,” and as the videos included here surmise, there are some very smart people who are asking lots of questions tainted by their personal backgrounds. But it is what they agree on that has stimulated my thinking and focused my mind on the hard evidence that is rapidly pouring in.
I wanted to write another Cliffhanger novel but I wanted it to be relevant to the world 100 years from now the way I read Jules Verne, Ayn Rand, H.P. Lovecraft or even Shakespeare. My favorite play of his is Titus Andronicus. His use of extreme violence to tell the moral story of love and loss—as well as dedication are the kinds of things I find infinitely fascinating and it doesn’t matter when in history we read such a story—they still communicate a truth which is valuable. Having these kinds of interests I couldn’t just write some average piece of fiction reviewers of today would like—I wanted to write something that people a century from now would marvel at and would still draw inspiration from. Yet I also wanted to make the argument that the values America had from around 1870 to about 1900 were the best the world had ever seen, and that those values should be captured in a bottle and examined in actually a scientific way—as having merit on culture building itself. The economic means of the country was explosive during that period, morality was respectable, and collectivism was being defeated wherever it was encountered—namely during westward expansion.
For about forty years I have had in my mind a really terrible antagonist and a concept for painting it into a story against the ultimate protagonist—but I needed to collect a lot of information to tell that story. Finally, I feel like I’m there. Once I had all the details worked out, I went to work writing it—and as I thought, it has turned out to be the byproduct of a hyperactive imagination, a technical background, legitimate scientific investigation and all the life experience learned in every hard way imaginable.
Knowing that over the next couple decades history will have to reflect what we are learning now—and that we will learn that not only are we not alone, but that we are currently in a relationship with thinking beings not from earth’s origin story and that the essential ingredient to a successful society resides within individual behavior as opposed to collective salvation—and that once that process begins—where democracies run by a mob take over the individual input of actual leaders—that all civilizations stop functioning and regress back to their beginnings.
Even as my protagonist, Cliffhanger fights bad guys with flaming bullwhips all in the name of justice—it is important these days to define the merits of that justice. It is not enough to simply show bad and good—it has to be defined by actual universal rules of engagement as defined by the observable conditions of our cosmos. To do that we have to step beyond our veil of politics and modern philosophy and take the next step. Taking that step is what and why I’m committing so much time to this new Cliffhanger story. Similarly to that Cannibals of Cahokia story—this Curse of Fort Seven Mile has the benefit of an additional twenty years of hard living and earned observation. Like H.P. Lovecraft I have a love for pulp fiction written in a romantic fashion—and on the surface that is what these new Cliffhanger stories are. But, my protagonist, Fletcher Finnegan in The Curse of Fort Seven Mile is actually named after one of my favorite literary figures of all time, the giant in Finnegan’s Wake from the James Joyce classic. My goals with the work are not to reach the New York Best Seller’s list, or even to get reviews from Publisher’s Weekly. It is to offer a useful philosophy for people grappling with real significant challenges to everything they believed was true for over 10,000 years and to provide them a softer landing philosophically—so to maybe for the first time in human history to provoke a change in mankind’s propensity to always revert back to the Vico cycle. Thus SpokeCliffhanger.
If you want a preview of this work they are available on the sidebar. But the real meat is yet to come and why I am dedicating some specific time and resources to completing it. To get a sense of it, just watch all these videos and you’ll get your mind ready to read what I’m putting into a story intended for readers of the next century. I’m not giving up on politics. But rather it is too small of a shoe for me now. The next obvious evolution is exopolitical theater and the vast changes it will bring. Currently it is a bit on the fringe side, but that will change rapidly—and when it does–well, people will want a point of reference and fiction is a good place to begin—by bridging what we know with what we will come to understand.
This is what democracy looks like when you have to take your constitutional republic back from communist insurgents bred through our public education system and nurtured through left leaning popular culture to destroy America. Watch the whole thing and send it to a friend.
And guess what; it will get far worse before it ever gets better. As a society we let this get out of hand. Now it will be very violent to get our country back. So be ready for it.
We’d be a whole lot better off if more people had the values of John Wayne. But unfortunately we live in a time when people actually think the Hollywood legend was a racist because our interpretation of those definitions have been defined by these radical left winged insurgents. They won’t give up their position without violence, so let’s give it to them and be ready for what follows. They took it from us, we are only taking it back.
There was a lot not to like about Quentin Tarantino’s latest film The Hateful Eight. I personally didn’t see it when it came out in theaters around Christmas of 2015 because of Tarantino’s political activism against police, but I put it on the checklist. It was sold as a western shot in 70mm traditional wide—just as Ben Hur was many years ago—so I figured it would be worth watching. My chance came once it was released to the home theater market and I was a little excited about it. But after two hours of movie realizing that the whole thing was going nowhere, I was very concerned that if Tarantino was the best that Hollywood had to offer—that they consider him a “modern” Shakespeare–that there is no wonder their movie industry was in trouble. At that point there was still about 45 minutes of movie left to show and I was ready to turn it off—but didn’t because I already had too much time invested.
This is what happens when someone becomes so full of themselves—and have been told by hundreds of aspiring actors and progressive movie producers that they are the greatest thing to arrive since fire. They forget that people actually will see their movies and that those people think very differently about the world than those tucked up against the mountains of California and the Pacific Ocean. The only good characters in The Hateful Eight was the Kurt Russell character. Samuel Jackson wasn’t the greatest and once he revealed an oral sex scene with another guy—I decided I didn’t like him and didn’t want to invest any more time into learning about him. Most of the movie took place inside a cabin getting to know all these characters who were telegraphed very early to being all completely killed off. There was no point to their stories or the interaction between them because it all led to one place—death.
The Hateful Eight is like a person being walked to an execution getting to know all the people spitting on him along the way. It just doesn’t make any sense because that person was going to be dead soon—so why waste the time? It was just horrendously stupid. Beautifully photographed, good soundtrack—most of the time—but just a stupid story—I can’t believe anybody read that script and thought it the work of a genius—and I can’t believe anybody gave Tarantino money to make that movie.
Coming from a guy who shares with me a love for the great movie, The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, Tarantino obviously isn’t at the same level of Sergio Leone, and I went into The Hateful Eight hoping sincerely that he was. Not even close—not even close to the sincerity of a spaghetti western, which I thought was the point of The Hateful Eight. It ended up being just another sign of a broken and declining culture that doesn’t make anything original anymore—even though all the tools were provided. To suggest that The Hateful Eight is anything close to the masterpiece Hamlet, just because everyone ended up dead in the end is ridiculous. There weren’t any sympathetic characters for which to hang a morality on in Tarantino’s movie. All the characters were villains and none of them were people I’d want to get to know if they sat down next to me at a bar.
Even using the barroom metaphor with The Hateful Eight seems underwhelming. Typically when a man wants to pick up a girl in a bar he engages in small talk to get her to reveal bits about herself. Once she decides to talk about herself the conversation evolves into more personal matters. Then as a climax and some trust won, the girl decides whether or not she wants to sleep with the guy. It’s a little mating game that our species plays to make the experience not seem so cheap. The Hateful Eight is like walking up to that girl and just flatly saying, “Let’s have sex.” Then spending three hours talking about all the things you should have talked about before blurting out the obvious. It was just despicable as a story—pathetic at every level.
I have liked other Tarantino movies—I thought Pulp Fiction was clever, and I enjoyed his work in other things—but I wouldn’t say he’s a master of anything. He’s only smart compared to the very stupid people who now make up the Hollywood industry which these days are just a few rungs above raw porn in its creative impulse. I am really glad that I did not go to see this Tarantino western at the theater because I would have been angry at wasting the money. The Hateful Eight wasn’t a western; it was a monstrosity of undeveloped ideas from a director who obviously has personal problems holding back his artistic ability.
As an example of how all westerns should be presented these days, The Revenant is still the featured example. If you are going to make a western, at least put in the work. So what if someone stole the script to The Hateful Eight and that’s why Tarantino made it into a feature film. The material wasn’t so good that an eight year old child couldn’t have written it—so whatever provoked big money donors to give Tarantino money for that piece of crap sadly overrated the ability of the troubled, progressive filmmaker. The movie wasn’t just bad enough to write a poor review about, it was bad enough that I personally feel like I was robbed just by watching it, because I can’t get back my time. It would have been a much better movie if Samuel Jackson hadn’t forced a naked man to perform oral sex on him, because in the last dying moments he was the only one left and I couldn’t help but think that he was the last person I wanted to see on the screen in the end. Given that, he was the best character in the movie after Kurt Russell’s character died of poisoning. The Hateful Eight was horrendous filmmaking and storytelling at its absolute lowest. Sadly, it represents a new generation that thinks it’s the work of genius—because people are now so stupid and have such a low opinion of themselves that they don’t know any better. People now can actually relate to these despicable characters. And that’s the real problem with The Hateful Eight and the filmmakers who put that trash on the screen.
Trump was wrong when he declared that the process which robbed him of all the Colorado’s delegates without a single vote cast was not very democratic. He’s right about the democratic process, but America has never been a democracy—which is just a stepping stone toward open socialism. America is a constitutional republic which should be better but in this case isn’t. The voting process which was intended to select those representatives were sold to the public as being acquired through a democratic process—but in this case it was cut short and was sabotaged by the Republican Party. That revelation has only served to substantiate the intense level of anger that has intensified during the primary campaign season. Yes, the system is rigged, it always has been, and we all knew it. But we didn’t know what the cost was to us because we had never seen another viable alternative that had gotten so far in the process other than Ross Perot many years ago. Trump by his popular successes has forced the party leaders to outwardly show their protections for the first time to people who are learning about this whole process as it develops in front of them. We should have learned all this in our public schools, but instead kids learned to riot and vote for socialism—so people are shocked by what they are seeing.
Among the #NEVERTRUMP clan, there is a feel of superiority over Trump and his supporters because those constitutional geeks work really hard to understand the Constitution and are legitimate nerds in a lot of ways. They are like Star Wars fans who argue over little specifics of the movies because they know everything while the common viewer only see a fraction of what they do in casual viewings. The #NEVERTRUMPs like the rules of the system because they worked really hard to learn that system—it gives them a feeling of superiority over everyone else—they are specialists on that topic and they secretly want to protect that specialty. I know several of them personally. So it gives them quite a charge to see that Trump is furious at losing delegates to Cruz. They would argue that if Trump wanted to play the game, then he should have learned the rules. But, what those #NEVERTRUMP geeks have forgotten is that Trump’s candidacy represents a large faction of the American population that have no desire to learn the rules of the game—because they hate the game—and the Republican Party has just solidified that sentiment epically. They want a change in the rules, they want to play a different game, and they sure don’t have any desire to learn the old rules.
This notion that the Republican Party can do whatever it wants—that they can nominate anybody they care to is preposterous. Sure they have their little club and they seem obsessed with controlling who is in it with them and where they stand in the peaking order in relation to others. No question many of the party leaders want to be king makers deciding who county commissioners are, governors, and presidents—but that’s not the way it was supposed to be. What they want to control is ultimately representatives of “the people” who elect them into a representative republic. The Republican Party for instance isn’t bigger to me than myself, or my family, or my community. It’s just a group of people who I either agree with or don’t. I am not beholden to a sacrificial relationship with them in any way. So if they show themselves as philosophically deficient—as they are clearly in the run for presidency in 2016—I have a right, and obligation to reject them. The “Party” does not have authority over “me” and is not empowered to provide “me” with a representative vetted by them for their own purposes. Clearly the Republican Party interprets their role as such—but I along with many others completely reject that premise. I will not vote for Paul Ryan for anything. He screwed up in 2012 and he won’t get another chance by me. I will not vote for John Kasich. He is the governor of my state, and he has let me down—he’s turned out to be an idiot. I will not vote for Mitt Romney—he has been a failure. I will not vote for Ted Cruz—he’s just another attorney running for office. I don’t want any more legal geeks messing with laws any more. I’m tired of the same old mess offered by the Republican Party and they either want to represent my philosophic conservatism, or they don’t. If they don’t, I am not beholden to them to take whatever piece of crap they offer.
The Republican Party arrogantly believes that it is the end all of American politics—as if the matter has been settled long ago after the Civil War turned out in their favor. They’d be incorrect, each age has its own challenges and the party leaders are either aligned with those challenges, or they will fail to lead their party to a position where it can be beneficial to the constitutional republic for which we are all a part. That republic was always founded on the merits of individualism, not collective assimilation—and that is precisely where the Republican Party is going wrong—in assuming that the “party” is too big for any one individual.
Trump represents a public need to establish a return to individual association. He is the ultimate pronoun “I” and that is what the people who vote for him want to see emerge in this year’s election cycle and obviously the Republican Party has a problem with that declaration. That leaves Trump and his supporters without a party—which of course will give rise to a competing party to rival the Republicans and Democrats. If 30% of the voting public doesn’t have a political party which represents them—or seeks to—then what are they to do? Surrendering their beliefs to one of the two other options isn’t viable as individuals. Yet the Republican Party seems inclined to insist on such a thing. As Ted Cruz gloated about his legalese victories around the west, particularly Colorado—and the use of the party machine in Wisconsin to goad Donald Trump into throwing a fit because people weren’t voting for him—he is assuming that the masses are on his side. Show me one time that Ted Cruz can fill a stadium with supporters like Trump does. All Cruz has on his side are the political geeks, not the average people who make up our Republic. They aren’t–wait until Cruz gets to New York, and Pennsylvania. The masses are speaking, and they haven’t been picking Ted Cruz. Cruz has been playing the legal game, but not winning the hearts of the masses. When Kasich says that it’s the delegates that matter, he’s right from his perspective within the game of politics—but the party for which he belongs is supposed to serve the conservative interests of the republic and instead they serve a collective notion of consensus building which I would argue is un-American. Want to see a national consensus established by the will of the people where they generally agree—go to a Trump rally. Trump voters, me included, reject that collectivist philosophic position and the party should be listening, instead of working to hold society to a set of rules designed to protect a system they have learned to profit off of as public servants.
When the smoke clears, Trump will have won many more votes in the primary effort—yet the political party seeking to maintain their control of that system will attempt to ignore that fact and offer up the same old garbage as they have before. And now that many of us have had a taste of what could be, we aren’t going to swallow that pill again—because it leads nowhere and we’ve learned. It is not the voting public that has to learn a lesson here—it’s the Republicans. They either get with the program, or they will be replaced. It is they who are in the weakened position—the public holds all the cards because ultimately the “party” either serves the interests of the public—the conservative public—or they don’t. And given their behavior against the popular front-runner Trump—it is obvious where all this is going. When it gets there I’ll be joining that old man from Colorado. I’m not going to hold my nose and vote for another Republican loser. They either start winning—or I’m done too with them. And victories are measured by the popular vote in this primary race, not the legal gymnastics of lawyers and political geeks.
I’m at a point where I don’t think I could support Republicans even if they did get behind Trump all of a sudden. I think the process is so broken and the philosophies so displaced that there is no mending it. As the link above describes the Colorado situation from the point of the of the GOP, the issue remains that the party leaders have made a system that ultimately they control, because it is rule heavy and requires a full-time staff to learn all those rules. It puts the power of candidacy in pin-heads and political addicts instead of the best and most viable candidates and is the root cause for why the Republican Party has been so grossly ineffective for such a long time.
The Overmanwarrior 