The Filth of Collective Religions and their Politics: I support the Jewish people because they are cleaner than the miscreants–belching, farting, grotesque, lazy losers of the world

I’ve never been one to talk much about religion to people until recently, when the intentions of the bad guys were never more apparent, so proclamations against them are more than warranted.  I think those who are fortunate enough to be born in Western civilization are extremely lucky to have exposure to Biblical religions.  But not for the reasons many might feel about immortality, the Trinity, and life in the church.  But for a point of religion that I don’t think gets near enough attention.  At the heart of Jewish religion is how they prepare their minds for spiritual life with God, and that is through cleanliness. Mainly the way the Jewish people set up the tent of the Tabernacle with the laws of God so carefully worshiped everlasting concepts at the heart of their relationship.  To behold God, the people, especially the high priests, had to be clean.  And I like clean people.  So, as I hear all this garbage about how bad the Jewish people are for the world and why we shouldn’t have ever created a state of Israel for them to reside in as most cultures around the world have wanted to eradicate them from the face of the earth, there is a kind of quiet hatred that permeates the whole concept.  Heathen religions are dirty.  The worship of Baal was dirty and still is.  Most of the religions of the world are pretty dirty.  But the Jewish people were very clean.  The Ark of the Covenant, which had within it the mercy seat where God could actually permeate into our world and communicate with people, had to be approached with purity.  They had to wash their hands carefully and keep all the dirty world of human life on the other side of a veil that protected the Ark from the dirtiness of life itself.  And I think there is a lot of good from this simple recognition. 

When we look at all the communists in the world and what they stand for I think of filthy people.  And that goes for the concept of partying.  Rock concerts, mosh pits, and dancing on dance floors at night clubs are dirty, sweaty, disgusting social exercises that are rooted in ancient Baal worship, and they are meant to appeal to the many maniacal characters of the spirit world, which I have explained many times as being explained by quantum mechanics.  I very much see the Bible as a rebellion from their previous domination of religion on earth and the kind of societies that were born from them, submissive, dirty, heathens to power players and politics.  What the Hebrew people were worshiping was something more significant than the dirty humans had previously embraced, which is very appealing to me.  As we are told that we need to be accommodating of homosexual relationships, transexual understanding, drugs, sacrifice, and collective-based entertainment, all that says to me is filth.  I like the concept of circumcision—washed bodies without the sweat and discharge of human mechanisms.  And sex was designed one way between a man and a woman.  Getting dirty with other people during sex is gross and I like most that the Bible addresses this issue in a way that is most appealing to me.  Most of the people in the world preaching communism, and the primary platform of the Democrat Party in America is also preaching filthy lives and gross interactions that naturally come from nature.  When they say to worship nature as globalists, they also say to abandon values that judge cleanliness from filth.  Nature is dirty.  Being clean is an act of conscious living.  To be clean is to rebel against nature and to show dominion over it.  Clean culture is a good one, and as we travel down the road of capitalist values, clean, nicely washed cars with wonderfully perfumed women going to dinner in them, and nicely pressed clothes are what we start to deal with instead of some human covered in denigrating tattoos and body piercings willing to give it a go with just anybody because we are all collective goo from the universe living life until death when we are all thrown back to the dirt from which we came, so why bother?

My grandparents both lived on farms, and one thing I always hated was wearing tennis shoes to their house and leaving with poo in the tread, especially when I had to go near the hen house to get eggs.  I was somewhere between the ages of 4 and 5 years old, and my parents and grandparents would look at me in bafflement as I tried to wipe my shoes clean of any poop in the grass.  They didn’t understand.  Nobody taught me to be that way; it is just something I have always hated, the filth of the human race, the things that the body produces to discharge waste.  I find it all disgusting.  So an orgy at some music festival with a bunch of stinky-haired losers sharing pot smoke and conducting acts of drunkenness was never appealing to me.  I was a bizarre teenager, and I couldn’t wait to get married and get off the rat race of social interaction.  I don’t like people who belch, fart, or who dress dirty.  I have learned to put up with them when I have to be around them, but I hold my breath in elevators so I don’t have to breathe other people’s air.  And I wouldn’t say I like touching them with bare skin, even accidently. 

The cleanliness of the Jewish religion is something that I find very appealing, and when a God demands such things, I get it.  That makes those religious preparations very lucrative to me.   In the Bible, humanity was to have dominion over nature, not to worship and be subversive to it.  And certainly not to relish in the filth of existence.   All this coexisting talk about putting up with other people’s dirty beliefs is not an appealing concept, and it has always bothered me.  I will never coexist with dirty people who have poor personal values, and in the politics of collectivism, there is this general assumption for social interaction that goes back to Baal worship, which I find most significant.  Behind their premise for existence is this worship of nature, of the dirty nature of life that comes with it, that I find utterly disgusting.  And I was born that way.  It’s not necessarily something I learned by attending church at a young age.  But I formed my opinions to pursue the divine through intelligent contemplation.  The dirt of life is meant to be subdued and not relished.  And politically, when those dirty religions want to impose on me their dirty lifestyles, I’m a hard no.  A very hard no.  It’s not just about having differences of opinion, but it’s about not accepting filthy people who are too lazy to bathe and justify it through collective-based religions.  I like the rituals that the Jewish people started, and I would support a Jewish state over just this premise alone.  Who has the cleaner religion?  That is the one I will take seriously.  That after-party at the Super Bowl, which I will have a lot to talk about once I cool down from what I saw, is not my idea of a good time.  And it’s certainly not what we should be celebrating as a culture.  But the rituals of the Jews and the demands of the God Yahweh, I respect that for how clean they were.  And how being clean was a domination over nature.  Not an embrace of it.  Which is the purpose of the human being as the universe created them.  Not to be disgusting animals eating their feces and humping the leg of anything that moves.  But to be deliberate in our work and clean while doing it.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The Scapegoat of Yom Kippur: Why the bad guys expect Israel to be destroyed, and President Trump

The acceptance level of sacrifice indicates in any society the ratio of liberalism we are dealing with.  The belief that by appeasing some greater power through sacrifice, redemption for some mistake can be made is at the heart of all liberal policies in the world.  And that notion is also used to control people.  So it was no accident that the Hamas attack was initiated against Israel during their festivities of Yom Kippur which is a direct association with the two goat ritual, which is the origin for the term “scapegoat” that we often say all the time without knowing its meaning.  In that ritual, one goat is offered for killing in the usual way, so a high priest would slaughter it and sprinkle its blood appropriately on an altar as an offering.  The other high priest would put their hands on and dedicate the nation’s sins, then send the goat into the wilderness to carry those sins away.  The insertion of the Jesus stories into the Bible was always meant to represent him as the ultimate scapegoat.  As an innocent man, his social role was to take away the guilt of the nation killing him, and through his crucifixion, he would carry that guilt into the afterlife.  So over the years, very evil cultures have built into people this accepted belief that they are not responsible for their actions, but can redeem themselves through Christ by sacrificing him or innocence to the needs of a corrupt society.  With that in mind, Hamas, who is dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish people, felt that they would be protected from retaliation if they struck on that Day of Atonement Holiday so that the sins would be carried away in the usual sacrificial manner.  That is why many of us watched, astonished in the aftermath, as such attacks were expected to be part of the sacrifice.  Israel wasn’t supposed to strike back, they were supposed to be the willing participants in the notion of sacrifice, which was being exploited at this particular time for purely political reasons. 

Of course, Israel has a right to attack the Palestinians who have been plotting their destruction.  The only logical rationalization resulting from the horrendous Hamas attack against Israel is the destruction of all those who stand against the Kingdom of God.  Not just because religions say so but because we now have a history that shows the benefits of Western Civilization, and we must defend it for the perpetuation of the human race.  Yet, even religions we like have apparent traces of the concept of sacrifice that are part of a much larger problem.  And that assumption was evident in the days after the attack in protests worldwide that didn’t expect the goat to fight back.  It was supposed to go quietly into history and carry away the sins of corrupt nations and religions seeking global domination.  So now we have protests from the attackers against the country that was supposed to be their scapegoat.  An enemy on paper and policy, but functionally in pursuing the ever after, the carrier of sins from those most guilty of reprehensible behavior.  The belief is that evil conduct can be committed just by the nature of living and that those sins can be placed with blame upon whoever will serve as the scapegoat for that society.  And everyone else will live happily ever after.  That is the absurdity of the belief that Israel must be like Jesus, to accept the role of international scapegoat, take its slaughter and the blame, and carry it away from those most guilty. 

This is the essential Deep State plan against President Trump.  The Government Gangsters so well flushed out in the excellent book by Kash Patel made President Trump their target for the carrying away of their sins, and it is expected that he will serve that purpose, which was the intent of the J6 controversy, the Russia hoax, the FBI spying and all the tampering of a fourth branch of government and its desire for sustainable power as a creature of liberalism and the perpetuation of the Liberal World Order.  What most people have in common is some notion of religion, and at the core of that belief system, no matter what gods are celebrated is a notion of sacrifice for some greater good that can then override whatever individual input might get in the way.  When personal responsibility is not a value system of a culture, then these kinds of beliefs can then be used to mass control entire civilizations into a guilt shedder and encourage sinful behavior with the knowledge that the gods can be appeased in the rituals of mass sacrifice.  This is how we constantly see this Democrat notion that what they are guilty of can be erased away by the creation of some social scapegoat.  They could kill and destroy individuals as long as they identified them as a scapegoat for their culture and could justify the violence as a redemption process.  That’s also why the Romans were sure to include Jesus in the context of the Bible because what was important to them was to have the entire story wrapped up in a sacrifice.  Once people are willing to sacrifice to a god, they will be open to the next best thing on earth: sacrifice to the state.  That’s what the Romans were after, and the Arab world was as well with their expansion of the Quran, written by many people because Muhammad didn’t know how to read or write.  But many of his Christian friends did, so he would have them write for him; after all, their results were all for the same purpose: creating scapegoats in a social context to wash away the sins of evil nations looking to justify their vile actions.

Like many things lately, people are watching this apparent evil and scratching their heads.  But it has been at the heart of all liberal ideas since the beginning of time, and this is the essential Democrat playbook and that of the uniparty antics many have become so frustrated with.  Of course, individuals have a right to defend themselves when attacked by some antagonizers.  That is the heart of the concept of the American Second Amendment.  And, of course, Israel can defend itself when attacked by terrorist ideas.  But to those looking for a scapegoat for their sins, the belief is that individuals and even nations should sacrifice themselves for the greater good, just as Jesus did, or any other character that suffered through martyrdom the sins of mass society.  And if the masses desire the eradication of their sworn enemies, enemies because they have expectations of good conduct, then those scapegoats are to happily offer themselves to the mob for consumption, which is how the world’s evils have always spread.  Personal behavior is never improved because the mass population believes that a scapegoat concept will wash away those sins without correcting the detrimental behavior holding back that society.  And you get the kind of mess we see daily on the nightly news.  And we see the attackers of Israel, then protesting not at the country itself but in not accepting their role as the sacrificial scapegoat that was expected of them by a corrupt and evil Liberal World Order. 

Rich Hoffman