Elon Musk’s Highly “Unscientific Poll”: Deregulating the world under a new Trump administration

Let’s talk about Elon Musk’s highly unscientific poll on his “X” platform, which had nearly 6 million real people voting for President Trump or Kamala Harris.  This is why the Democrats at their convention are obsessed with beating President Trump because the internals, the cross tabs of all the national polling are pointing in the same direction.  However, this is the power of Elon Musk’s endorsement and his support of Trump on “X,” formally known as Twitter.  The poll showed that 73% of “X” users wanted Trump as President instead of Kamala Harris.  Now, I would not call “X” a right-wing platform.   And I would not call Elon Musk a right-wing guy.  Only a few years ago, he was the face of the World Economic Forum and a spokesman for globalism and climate science concerns.  Heck, his main revenue stream is in making electric cars.  He wants to power the earth with solar panels.  Well, something incredible is happening that is worth taking note of.  And it all started with that assassination attempt on Trump.  Elon Musk has been leaning toward Trump, especially after all his experiences with the Biden administration’s regulatory burdens.  Even a few months ago, when I was reviewing Elon Musk’s most recent book, it seemed unfathomable that Musk would endorse Trump for president.  Musk was a DeSantis guy, a recent development for one of the wealthiest people on earth.  So for Musk to buy Twitter and turn it into an actual free speech machine, essentially destroying the long-held gains of media control by a centralized government, a lot more than just a political stunt happened, and it came unleashed during a “Spaces” interview that Musk did with Trump that was spectacular.  When the smoke clears from this 2024 election, it will be “X” as a platform that shows the natural way of the world with true consumer sentiment.  The government propaganda that is the push behind Kamala Harris never had a chance. 

I thought the “Spaces” interview that Elon Musk had with Trump was one of the most important things to happen in the world at any point in history.  If you’ve ever been to Hyde Park in London, England, there is a tiny part of the park called Speaker’s Corner, where open debate and free speech are somewhat encouraged to take the edge off protestors and social discontent.  But most of the world is under the thumb of some bully administration of government that suppresses the expression of free ideas.  Not so suddenly, Musk bought Twitter and turned it into “X” to solve many of the problems of tyranny in the world.  Twitter was an asset to the various intelligence agencies seeking to control free speech and gather information on people who might cause them trouble.  I am still heavily shadow-banned on the “X” platform, even with Elon Musk owning it.  But listening to that 2-hour interview with Musk and Trump just talking to each other was remarkable, and it was shattering many thousands of years of oppressive government regulation in multiple cultures.  And the beauty of the American Constitution played out in how it was designed.  Having that conversation, unregulated and free of burden, was remarkable.  And it was the game-changer in this election.  Yes, it started with Truth Social.  If Trump hadn’t built that social media platform from the ground up, it’s highly likely that Elon Musk never would have bought Twitter and turned it into “X.”  But now that he has, the world’s governments have lost control of their gains by controlling free speech in a way that the world has never seen.  And those polling results are precisely what terrifies them and have Democrats horrified of President Trump, which, after all they have done, they should be. 

There is no more powerful news media company now than Elon Musk, who controls the “X” social media platform.  And as I’ve been saying for a long time, this conversion of Musk to Trump didn’t happen overnight.  Elon Musk didn’t just decide yesterday to become a conservative.  This is a transition that has come over time and experience.  Out of necessity, Musk dedicated his life to taking humans to Mars, and there was only one way to get there.  And I’m not talking about rockets.  Humans can build just about anything.  Invention is not the problem.  The problem is that humans also penalize themselves with timidity, so we give governments too much power by default.  And we allow them to create too much regulation, which is currently the world’s biggest threat.  Elon Musk sees through Trump a path to solving that problem by making himself the head of the Department of Government Efficiency with a President Trump appointment.  Under Trump, the thing that has to happen is massive deregulation and a shrinking of government in every way possible.  All those ridiculous government jobs that are out there need to be private sector positions, so a massive transition has to occur, and Trump is the best way to get there.  And Musk knows it’s in his best interest, given his dedication to the cause, to help Trump. 

We’re seeing the same thing going on with RFK supporting Trump.  When Democrats are moving into the GOP tent, that’s a good thing.  We may not be all ideologically aligned.  There is a lot with Elon Musk that I would say is way too progressive for my way of thinking.  But I can deal with people who disagree with me.  What I can’t deal with are people trying to destroy my country and attempting to kill or control the entire human race.  We have seen just such characters at the World Economic Forum.  Thinking back to an old friend at Clear Channel Radio in Cincinnati, Darryl Parks, he predicted that someone like Elon Musk would come along and change how radio broadcasts were done.  Through “X,” radio has changed forever through its “Spaces” utilization.  That interview between Musk and Trump reached over a billion people 24 hours after it happened, which is phenomenal.  But it’s also the way of the future.  As humans colonize space, it’s through communication through “X” that people will keep up with media and exchange ideas.  It won’t be the traditional print and FCC-controlled wave broadcasts.  Hosting a podcast on “X” is far more potent than being booked as a guest on a cable news station.  I learned that myself years ago after I did a stint on CNN.  My blog platform reached many more people over a long period than the bits you can do on traditional television.  Now, Musk owns that formula for perpetuating the human race into a change state that will make human beings interplanetary.  Musk has spent billions of dollars making his vision for humans migrating into space possible.  And at this point, the only thing standing in his way is the Democrat party and their governments of global communism and stifling regulatory burdens.  And with Trump back in the White House, Musk can play a substantial massive role in making the government less intrusive, as he has done with his management style at Tesla and “X.”  And I think it’s inspiring and fascinating, the complete opposite of what we have been seeing out of government.  And it is more than within reach, according to that “unscientific” poll, which looks far more accurate than anything else.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Defending Alex Jones: The stageplay that hides the many crimes of the Administrative State

No matter what someone might think of Alex Jones and his Infowars broadcasts, he continues to be the example that the administrative state uses to enforce their vision for policy control. We saw it clearly when he was banned from YouTube a number of years ago. What followed after that was shocking to many, but Alex Jones saw the strategy first. And of course, in this crazy trial where supposedly Sandy Hook victims from that terrible school shooting are allowed to seek financial compensation for how they feel about what Alex Jones said about the case, which was essentially that it was a school shooting scripted by government characters designed to advance changes in social sentiment toward guns. For that belief and his broadcast of it to others, we are supposed to clap and cheer that the court and jury are awarding to those victims millions and millions of dollars of confiscated wealth from Jones as punishment for not believing in the official narrative issued by the government about the tragedy of the story. It’s a clear violation of 1st Amendment protections, but the calculation is that nobody in their right mind would defend Alex Jones for his preposterously inflated statements. Everyone, including Jones, can agree that Sandy Hook was a tragic school shooting. But the beliefs of what should happen as a result of that school shooting have been wide-ranging, and obviously, the characters who are behind the school shooting with direct complicity needed a certain kind of narrative to hit the public so that control of that public can be maintained, unimpeded by people like Jones.

Like many people who find themselves in these crooked courts these days, I like Alex Jones. I think his show is valuable in asking questions that should be asked in a free society. But obviously, from the administrative state perspective, and this is undoubtedly the case with Warroom with Steve Bannon as well, questioning authority was never in the plan of these new globalist insurgents. I say new because Americans aren’t very familiar with them. Up until Covid came along, Americans only knew about these types of people from Alex Jones broadcasts, and I would say without insulting him that Jones is just an ordinary guy uniquely looking at the world and asking questions the way a typical person who attends demolition derbies, and flea markets might. Alex Jones represents how many people think about things, which is the key to his success over the years. That is also why he’s a target because the administrative state wants to show that Alex Jones can be taken down, and so can anybody else.   The whole point of the trial, which is the front page news of every outlet in the world presently, is to demonstrate that a rigged court could destroy Jones and his Infowars, and there was nothing that could be done about it. Yet when Jones talks about the court being rigged, the deck is so stacked against him that much of what he says comes out sounding like a lunatic. Because nobody can coordinate the way he suggests, people just aren’t that smart. Jones always misses the root cause of the conspiracies because he often gets soaked up in what happens in the world, not so much in why. But because of this case, I think it’s probably time to get into the details of who these administrative state people really are and why they are so dangerous. And how America was formed to eliminate them from the world stage. 

Alex Jones often touches on many of these demonic and cryptic characters, and his analysis can be funny, entertaining, and boisterously over the top. I enjoy his broadcasts, but they often do not get to the details I like to deal with. But if he were like that, the show’s entertainment value would disappear, and he would not be as popular to the masses as he is. I often think of things as a stage play, and the media, our courts, and our political order are presented to us in a way that we might attend a play. What happened on that stage, which was clearly the narrative of the court case against Alex Jones, was the crucifixion and complete destruction of a leading figure who used the First Amendment to resist the power of the global administrative state. But what makes that play work are the ticket takers, the ushers, the stagehands behind the curtain, and the costume makers; they all play a part behind the scenes to make that show on stage happen. And we are only supposed to be watching the stage, the things they want us to look at. But if you really want to understand the play you are watching and to determine its quality, then you have to look at everything, including what’s behind the stage, to the real essence of the show. Alex Jones has made his living talking about the things that are backstage while people are watching him on stage. Hearing him talk about it is one thing, but seeing it and understanding it is much harder because what he’s talking about is concealed from the public’s view. The media is the curtain, and the real elements that keep the play alive are concealed there.

The court proceeding’s primary goal in the Alex Jones case was essential to ignore the American concept of free speech, to make a person liable for other people’s feelings. They were to confiscate the wealth from Jones in much the same way that the inquisition in Europe used to against enemies of the court for precisely the same reasons. It’s a show of power that the court doesn’t deserve to have, and America was formed to destroy in the world. And here it is in our courts, hiding behind victims of a terrible school shooting for the purpose that the school shooting occurred. The question about what motives created the shooting is not discussed, and for having a theory about what those might be and how insensitive they were to the victims is the point of the massacre, to establish case law that can then be applied to many more cases in the future. If Jones can go down for the opinions of others, then the door is opened for many other issues over much more minor infractions. And because Jones is such a wild figure, most of the people in the best positions to defend him are silent because they don’t want to be tagged with a “conspiracy” title next to their names. So they remain hidden from the conflict without opinion so to avoid the disaster of affiliation. And in that way, the courts are just as Alex said they were; it was a coordinated attack. Only the participants aren’t exactly conscious of it. Instead, they know their job in putting on the play; they learned how to play their parts in the show during their many years of public schooling and college. So they often do those jobs without being told and, in that way, are complicit. The evil isn’t conducted in the way we are trained to see it in movies and books; the narrative is not on the stage; it’s off behind the curtain. Alex stands on the stage like a maniac and talks about how evil it is just outside of everyone’s vision. But, unfortunately, people only see Jones, under the lights and with the microphone talking about it. And thus, that is how the show goes on and why Alex Jones is being isolated and destroyed by those invisible hands who have always run the administrative state. 

I think Alex Jones will be fine. He could do his show in the back of a car if he wanted. He could run Infowars as a guerrilla operation with a limited staff, so his show will go on. But what we have learned from his trial is another matter. That administrative state has shown itself in ways that have people curious about what’s happening behind the scenes, and they may be ready to hear it. And for that, I think I can help show them around, and will. 

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business

If You Vote for Hillary Clinton, You’re Stupid: Listen to the best news coverage anywhere of a very important 2016 week

image1 (3)I watched a lot of news over the last week, mostly by choice.  To me we are at war and I want to know the intelligence of the battlefield movements.  This war we are fighting so far hasn’t turned to guns too much, but it is along ideological elements.  It hasn’t turned grossly violent yet.  It was a big news week around the 4th of July of 2016 and my life has been busy.  I am grateful to the very nice people—and they know who they are—who gave my wife a chance to meet Donald Trump and Newt Gingrich this past week.  She isn’t the type of person who gets glowy eyes for celebrity.  If a star musician stepped up next to her at a shopping mall, she wouldn’t even blink in excitement, but when Trump told her that she was “beautiful,” it made her year (I caught the picture a little late as Donald was moving away from my wife heading to the next person)—so thank you to the people responsible for putting us in that unique position.  I’d also like to thank Linda Hughes at 1600 WAAM radio for all the times she has allowed Matt Clark to have me on during his monumental Saturday afternoon broadcasts.  The broadcast we did on 7-9-2016 I think beat any hour-long news broadcast in the entire country during the entire previous week—and that includes Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and all the big radio guys.  Not even Bill O’Reilly nailed down the Hillary Clinton email scandal or the Dallas domestic terrorist issue better than Matt and I did in the following broadcast.  I would recommend that you listen to it dear reader and pass this along to a friend.  Its information critical to the failures of our times by the political left and addresses the necessary steps it will take to correct our path in America for the future.

https://soundcloud.com/clarkcast/fbi-proved-clinton-lied-racial-tension-further-divides-us-7-9-16-podcast

Because of those frequent broadcasts on WAAM I have a radio studio set up at my house, which I am showing for the first time in pictures taken on July 9th.  For me it is Mt. Olympus, a place of divine philosophy that can reach the far edges of the globe—so I put a little effort into what gets said at that table.  I’ve been to quite a few radio studios over the years, and the one at my house is by far the best—for me.  Everything is clearer from my seat at that table in front of that particular microphone.image1 (2)

As I said on the air, I was watching Barack Obama further embarrass America while giving a speech from Warsaw, Poland.  I had the sound turned down so it wouldn’t get picked up on our WAAM broadcast, but I could read the captions, and the President’s body language.  Obama had his right shoulder pointed toward the audience most of the time with his head cocked slightly to the right in a way that gave away a lot of guilt he was obviously concealing.  That stance is reminiscent of many statues of important people and is a learned behavior that a guilty person falls back on while trying to sell something to others that the perpetrator themselves are trying to buy into.  Essentially, Obama was trying to get himself to buy into what he was selling to the world as he spoke.  He proposed that local police were insufficient, that they needed to be federalized—he proposed gun control measures—and he failed to identify the role he played in the creation of domestic terrorism between the races—which obviously climaxed in Dallas, Texas.image2

What was hilarious if the situation were even funny, was that Obama and his political left proposed more gun control and more federal control when the story they were happy to conceal—which was that Hillary Clinton is in big trouble because she perjured herself in front of congress—revealed during the FBI testimony—and that the government at all levels had proven itself to be completely incompetent.  The political left has their fingerprints all over these issues because they have not allowed Republicans to be a part of the decision-making process.  The only role Republicans have played in all these issues is that they have went along with many of the proposals so not to be called silly names like “racists,” “Nazis,” or “angry white guys.”  Fear of the name calling has forced Republicans to cave on almost every issue the political left has proposed and this is what we get as a government—a mess with various factions in open war with one another and a former Secretary of State who can’t tell the truth about the position of the sun in the sky.  She seems to be willing to lie about anything—and she clearly can’t be trusted even at a minor level of security—yet she’s running for the most secure position in the entire world.image2 (1)

Matt and I gave what turned out to be one of the most balanced broadcasts in media and I’d attribute it to a couple of things.  Neither Matt nor I make our living off his radio show—so we do it out of passion—purely.  We are doing it because we want to and Linda doesn’t really put pressure on the ratings for that afternoon timeslot—not in the way that larger outlets might be concerned with.  That frees up our minds a lot to be as straight as the truth allows—which we fully utilized.  The second is that I get the opportunity to do things like shake hands with Donald Trump and others—so I can know them on a more personable level which gives me an objectivity that other outlets don’t have.  Like my wife, I am not enamored by celebrity.  Debbie Boehner was standing right next to me the other day, as was Newt Gingrich and the head of the Butler County Republican Party, and to me we are all just people doing our best to do what’s right.  That allows me to listen to them without the tapestry of celebrity which puts what they say in a different realm of communication.  It allows me to then report to a radio audience information in a unique way—where Linda gives Matt a lot of freedom to report on her airwaves and I have life experiences that color the discussion with large doses of reality that is hard to come by.  When those two things come together some good work is done and I am particularly proud of our broadcast on July 9th.  In the long history of me doing radio broadcasts over the years, that show will go down as one of my favorites.image3

I propose working through problems with the First Amendment before resorting to the 2nd.  That kid in Dallas let the hate of race baiters heckle him into action against white police officers and he was wrong.  The media were wrong for stoking the flames which caused that kid to act and Obama set the table for everyone way back when he declared that Trayvon Martin could have been his son.  To hide his guilt in feeding the frenzy that is causing all the racial anxiety, Barack Obama suggested more gun control and insisted that the answer was in more federal control of people’s lives.  Yet just days prior, Hillary Clinton–who is running for president of the United States, was revealed to be grossly incompetent in her handling of her email situation—which was revealed as a result of the Benghazi hearings of a few years before.  During the FBI revelation of their findings it was discovered that Clinton had perjured herself during those same Benghazi hearings—so the revelation was that Hillary was not only stupid, but she was in fact a criminal who will be certainly facing jail time because of that crime alone—not to mention all the crimes she has not been caught yet with.   And those are the facts which Matt and I weaved into a simple hour-long broadcast.  I dare anybody in media anywhere to do better.  I bet they can’t.image4

Now, about some of the Trump rally pictures above, which were taken during the Cincinnati rally on July 6th.  At the end Newt came up to my wife specifically, it was just the two of them alone for a moment, and she shook his hand politely but quickly turned away from him leaving it to me to do a little clean up.  We watch Gingrich almost every night on Fox News so he certainly has celebrity appeal, and most people would be proud to have their picture standing next to such a person.  Well, my wife and I don’t do that.  In truth, my wife isn’t sold on Gingrich as she does not like the way he has handled his personal life on a few occasions.  She felt the same way about Donald Trump for a long time.  If not for the quality of Melania Trump and Trump’s daughter Ivanka, my wife would not be on the Trump train.  So she needs some time to get used to Newt Gingrich being with Donald Trump.  She almost turned down a V.I.P. invite just because she didn’t want to see Newt Gingrich or our local celebrity Sheriff Jones in person.  (She feels Jones doesn’t do enough to rid Butler County of drugs which is her issue with him).  Newt obviously felt strange when my wife shook his hand then turned away quickly leaving him standing there all by himself.  I was laughing because I knew what she was thinking and I also knew how Newt took it so I snapped a quick picture which is the closest thing to posing with a celebrity that you’ll get from my wife—or I for that matter.   I quickly stepped up to Newt and shook his hand to take away the awkwardness and get him back on track—because for him it was tough to work a V.I.P. line and have the first person you stepped up to reject you with a cold fish handshake.  I think that perspective is one of the reasons that Matt and I do so well together.  We can’t do it all the time, because we are both very busy people professionally.  But we do it often enough to make a difference.  And the audience of his radio broadcasts is the direct benefactor.  So use them accordingly and with a nod of appreciation.  They are truly unique broadcasts.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.