Tag: health insurance

The Future of Healthcare: Living to over 150 years

I don’t do it every time, but sometimes, when I get a chance to talk to important people about something that everyone is interested in, I share it, which was certainly the case this week when I had an important meeting with high-level people about the future of healthcare.  These people are interested in helping shape Trump’s next four years into a success story, and our conversation migrated to healthcare and what it should look like by the end of Trump’s next four years.  I was being asked because they wanted an out-of-the-box answer, which I said was probably the easiest thing on Trump’s plate.  Healthcare is super easy to deal with.  It’s only hard if you are trying to preserve the old sickness model where insurance companies profit from the slowed demise of people ahead of death.  That is a dead model, and whenever people talk about health insurance or healthcare in general, that is what they want to throw money at.  And that game has been over for quite a while now.  Which, to that point, was the reason for this important meeting.  And what I told them was worth sharing with everyone else, so I’m happy to let everyone else in on the conversation.  I don’t think we were breaching any NDAs or anything.  I told them about the two problems of the human population in the future and that the Trump administration would have to solve both of them with some connected policy that would let the current system slip away into oblivion and embrace a whole new approach.  We talked about business cycles, and the way we treat people for healthcare ailments is about as practical today as a horse and buggy competing in the Indianapolis 500 is to the racing world.

“So what’s the future look like?” they asked me.  “A lot different,” I said.  We have two main problems: we have a depleted birth rate.  To become a multi-planetary species, we need to have a lot more newborn babies come into the world.  We don’t want to lose so many children to abortion or the decision not to have children because they cost a lot of money. Marriages are complex, and people aren’t so interested in all the hard work it takes to make a family.  We have to change that mindset.  Then we have the other problem: people live for too long in a depleted state.  The extra 20 years that people are living post-retirement can be said only to serve insurance companies and the pharmaceutical industry that seeks to profit off the extended demise of people.  Rather than treat them for what’s breaking, we have a financial model that plugs into them as they die and profit off their loss.  Then, the government looks forward to stealing a lifetime of wealth with estate taxes at the end of life.  It’s a cannibal-based system resulting from gross mismanagement by a leadership culture of politics and social influencers.  The solution is in stem cells, where we get them, and how we build healthcare policy around using them to make a society that lives longer and still encourages birth rates to increase for couples inspired to start families and make commitments worth fighting for, which of course got a lot of eager faces hungry for more information.  Stem cells have been around for a while, but we know enough now to build a policy around them as a real healthcare solution that provides the best opportunity for people working in healthcare to continue.  But changing the motivations toward lifetime longevity is profitable longer than just allowing people to become sicker until they die away, leaving little behind gradually. 

Typically, when hospitals provide birthing services to new babies, the afterbirth, the placenta, and umbilical cords are tossed away into the garbage as biowaste, which is entirely foolish.  The placenta and the umbilical cords that give babies new life are valuable; they shouldn’t be thrown in the trash.  Hospitals should sell those items to stem cell labs for treatments for people seeking longevity care for health concerns.  If you wanted a stem cell injection to get a rotator cup repaired or a new knee or hip replacement, you could go to Panama City, Panama, and get a $15,000 injection, which would immediately boost cell growth to fix the problem areas without surgery.  It is a much better method than traditional methods.  Stem cells, especially those out of placentas and umbilical cords, will fix anything naturally and don’t need to be aimed at specific tissue.  When introduced to a body, they present competition to an aging cell structure within the body that finds they need to perform better, which is the result.   Stem cells only stay in the body for a couple of days.  But that infusion of activity jumpstarts the aging cell structure into behaving as it did when the body was much younger.   People find that they heal as they did at the start of their life rather than in a depleted state at the end.   Many sports figures are already using stem cells to fix torn ligaments and worn-out cartilage rather than going through the invasive surgeries that have been the typical path. 

Hospitals could get very rich selling these placentas and umbilical cords to stem cell providers, who could then save the healthcare industry from people slowly dying and being a drag on the entire system.  Not to make it sound bad, but what is more worthless in the world than an older adult who can’t work anymore, who is costing thousands of dollars every week in medical care?  We want that person to live longer and healthier.  Their age limit should be more than 150 years rather than 80 years old as it is now, after essentially 20 years of retirement and lousy health.  Stem cells return people to their youthful healing process, and you can get all the cells you need from new birth rates.  Hospitals to inspire more births could offer nearly free birthing processes to young couples and make all their money off selling the created afterbirth.  Of course, the current healthcare professionals don’t want anybody to know about these methods; they don’t want to change.   They want the government to dump wasted money into an ineffective system.  But at this point, we are about 4 years away from stem cells being mainstream anyway.  It might as well happen during Trump’s term rather than after so he can get the credit for it.   Because the only thing holding us back now is policy.  Not science.  This technology has been around in the form I’m talking about for about 4 to 5 years.  And by 2030, it will be almost as common as going to the dentist.  The cost per stem cell treatment will come down a lot and be affordable.  So, there is no downside.  It’s the future, and it’s here now.  Death and the aging process are decisions, not fate.  And for those concerned about the natural order of things being disrupted by science, I would point to the many biblical characters who lived many years past 100, and if they can live longer and pass down more wisdom to the next generations, then we would be much better off as a culture.  We need to solve both problems, aging and low birth rates, at the same time.  And this is the way to do it within a few short years of the next Trump presidency.  And all that’s keeping us from doing it is ourselves and a very slight refocus on the purpose of healthcare in a social context.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

The ‘Soylent Green’ Effect: Stepping away from the cannibal medical industry of socialized medicine

Cannibals are common in our past, and present.

My daughter and I were sitting in the backyard of her Liberty Township home and looking at the homes that were all around her property. Most were valued at a million dollars each, and we wondered how all those people could afford those homes.  What jobs could they possibly be doing?  And sadly, the answer is that they mostly all work in the medical industry to some degree.  Many of them are in the sales business, whether selling syringes that cost .35 cents to make to a hospital for $200 or X-ray machines and other medical equipment with massively inflated costs.  The markup in the entire medical profession is extraordinarily high, and nobody cares or does anything about it because the cost of all that waste is covered by health insurance.  So, the two industries feed off each other horrendously inefficiently, making everything cost a fortune.  Most of the Liberty Township, Ohio population currently living in those big homes have incomes that can even think about living in those expensive homes because they work in the medical industry or in insurance, making all that funding possible.  There is no way that kids just getting out of college can afford one of those homes, so what is going to happen next to a country that is already struggling with debt, held down by it in grotesque ways?  Well, that’s when I talked about the miracle of the recent SpaceX flight and the upcoming election win of Trump back into the White House, where many of these medical problems will be the subject of his next administration.  And the Kamala Harris people have been trying to use the health insurance issue as a way to scare people away from Trump because, as they say, the President doesn’t have a plan.  Well, the fix to the medical industry is more capitalism, not this socialized medical model we have today that only exists so that people can profit from the prolonged death of people.  I call it the Soylent Green model if people remember that famous movie with Charlton Heston. 

Soylent Green was a dystopian thriller from 1973 where old people were essentially put in a room upon their death and shown all kinds of heavenly images while they died off to give them comfort.  But the moment they died, their bodies were carted off to be chopped up into pieces and processed into food for society to eat.  That is essentially what our current medical industry is; it’s just an extension of the kind of human sacrifice that is common in all leftist cultures, particularly in the Near East with the ancient Canaanites.  The Aztecs, the Cahokians, and the Maya were killing people everywhere worldwide as part of their cultural belief system.  The consumption of human life is to sustain the up-and-coming lives, whether it be in the belief that gods would make it rain for that society or that the old need to be killed off for the young to eat.  The belief system is as old as time, and we have options as a human race with science as a tool only now.  Lots of options.  Using those same biblical references where God wanted the Israelites to kill off the people of the land of Canaan, it was because they were so wicked that Yahweh was disgusted with them.  And we are faced with the same moral dilemma today.  And many of those biblical characters lived for over 100 years.  In some cases, they lived for nearly a thousand. 

Notice how we haven’t talked about STEM cells in a while.  During the 90s, after Jurassic Park came out, people were always talking about cloning and rebuilding human tissue with stem cells.  The sad truth is that we are dealing with a medical industry that has turned to socialized science to produce a Soylent Green effect, and they don’t want to heal people, they want to feed off them.  They want to prolong their deaths so they can profit off their demise as just a modern form of human sacrifice.  Nobody needs to get sick and die the way we currently do.  But even down to the mortuaries, if we apply the same kind of science to the health of our society, a lot of the people who make fortunes off the death of the elderly will suddenly be out of a job.  We have an economy of death that is built on the notion of human sacrifice, and we don’t have to.  Suppose we applied the exact science that allowed SpaceX to land that excellent Super Heavy Booster on October 13th, 2024. In that case, we can also stop aging and heal people back to their prime selves using technology that allows cells to repair a person instead of gradually depleting them.  And the good news is that with a Trump victory, that is the answer to the health insurance problem.  Why would we continue to throw money at a health insurance industry that charges $200 for a little plastic syringe?  When Kamala Harris says she has a plan to help people pay for their medical costs with socialized Obamacare or Medicaid expansion, what is needed is a medical industry with a lot more capitalism in it and the goal of curing cancer and all aging diseases.  Not to sustain them long enough to live a ten-year life of gradually more medical bills paid for by insurance so that younger people can live in million-dollar homes for a while before they go through the same process.  What our current medical industry is cannibalism and just as stupid as every ancient culture that practiced it, which is the foundation of all liberal thought. 

Here’s the other math problem, and Elon Musk knows this all too well.  At this point, for the big picture, we need as many human beings to live as long of lives as we can get them to, and that is not part of the current health insurance discussion.  There is a belief in that same cannibal liberalism that we need to save the earth from those pesky humans, which is part of a mass killing plan that comes up with Big Pharma and the beliefs of The World Economic Forum.  People need to go away so the earth can live; that’s what people like Bill Gates believe these days.  But what we need is the opposite.  We need more people to live longer to colonize space and survive as a species.  The exact needs were present when the Bible was written by people who needed to survive long enough to carry intelligence to the future.  We are in the same situation now.  We are all there are for now because of low birth rates and the fact that it would take a century to produce the number of people needed for this space fairing enterprise.  And we all need to survive for a lot longer lifespans.  So when Trump is asked what his plan is for health care and he says he will plan to bring more competition to the industry, which a lot of short-term thinkers are terrified of because it will destroy the $200 syringe business, the truth is that we have to entirely scrap the old system and embrace a medical approach that heals people and keeps them working longer, having children longer and living as long as they can to transfer their lifetime achievements to future generations more effectively, directly.  The economy will have to change toward invention and preservation instead of decaying human flesh and profiting off the demise.  But first, we have to have courage, elect Trump, and change our entire society away from the Soylent Green model and toward proper restoration and preservation for thousands of years into the future. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call