The Attack Vector of Globalism: Immigration and drugs are their strategy to destroy America and make a ‘global citizen’

Of course, we have been at war for a long time, but not in the conventional sense.  Most of the wars, if not all of them, in the last century, even going back to the Civil War, were concoctions of finance, the tampering of globalism to destroy the concept of sovereign nations and create “united nations.”  The delivery method has been propaganda, not overt domination with ground troops the way wars have been traditionally fought and defined.  And when you understand the political leanings of finance, where the wives traditionally leaned far left and dabbled in the occult, the men followed their wives socially and lent themselves to progressive causes.  This is to say, there is some degree of global socialism as designed by Karl Marx baked into high finance societies.  And in high society, they contemplated what they thought people were or weren’t.  And when they turned their gaze to America, to destroy all concepts of nationalism in favor of global identity, they studied what had been done to the American Indian as the method to kill those who became members of the greatest nation on earth.  This is very obvious when the point of reference is westerns, such as Kevin Costner’s newest Western, Horizon, which is very good.  The Indians were hostile savages who were in the way of Manifest Destiny, and the Christian notion of destiny and rule-based fate are ideas that global communists chide against even today, including what they think they learned from Westward Expansion.  It’s important to understand that what these globalists are doing to America is purposeful and an act of war once you place yourself in their shoes and see the world somewhat as they do.  They do not like Americans.  They do like primitive people from all over the world because they make good subjects to rule over, so they tend to embrace societies that are tribal as opposed to inventive. 

They see how Americans flooded the West with immigrants after wave after wave of migrants continued to perpetually come.  No matter how fast the Indians killed off the settlers, they just kept coming until it wasn’t long before the Indians were gone, and the immigrants replaced an entire race of indigenous people.  That’s not how I see it, but it is how global communists (progressives) in high finance see it from their limited understanding of life in general.  The open border policies of globalists are only to be understood one way: as an attack on sovereign nations to change their country from one thing to another.  The open borders in America, for instance, is a military exercise meant to reverse what happened to the Indians by the Americans.  In the circles of high finance and the movement of the many sophists in the wives clubs of the early last century, permeating today into the various feminist movements and communist offshoots, the belief is that the way to beat America for its sins of the past, for its society built on slavery, is to kill them off the way they killed off the Indian, with wave after wave of immigration, until they are all outvoted, or gone by interbreeding.  Of course, there are lots of holes in this understanding of the world, and it’s very limited, but if you sit in most dinner conversations of high society, they think this is the objective view of history and the way to destroy those pesky American capitalists once and for all.  For what they did to the American Indians, they will have then turned back on them, and within a few generations, they will be destroyed from the face of the earth, forgotten by history.

The other thing that occurred during western expansion was that trade with Indians introduced them to alcohol, a poison that utterly ruined them.  Indians couldn’t deal with the requirements of their culture, leading to the very rapid demise of their men and, therefore, the ability to continue reproducing as heads of a family.  So, as Indians were killed off in battles and range wars, they could not replace their populations with a new generation because they were ruined and drunk. After years of casual study by a lot of communist-oriented history professors, they have analyzed the destruction of the American Indian down to these two objectives, and they have rolled those sentiments into this modern strategy of creating a global citizen, using what worked against the American Indian and applying it to the contemporary American and European.  You don’t see mass migration, for instance, going into China or Japan.  It’s only in areas of the world where finance is sponsoring social change for a military incursion, designed by the desire and need to create a United Nations global citizen.  The drugs flooding our border and culture, even down to the persistent trap to make marijuana legalized and normalized, are attempts to poison our youth culture outright and destroy any notion of a work ethic.  The amount and desire to use drugs and intoxicants of all kinds is a military objective that has been cast upon American society not as a pleasure but as a destructive element of chaos meant to destroy all traces of the Anglo-Saxon influence and Bible thumpers of Western civilization.  To see it, you must understand the people behind the bioweapon COVID-19, a proven fact with plenty of evidence.  But the evil intention is well beyond the scope of most trusting people.  The same desire to kill off entire races of people is behind permissive drug use, and they are using the fate of what was witnessed with the American Indian and alcoholism as their model for destruction presently.

The new movie Horizon captures the sentiment perfectly.  I’ve watched every Western movie made many times.  I’ve read books and studied history, and that film reminds me a lot of Teddy Roosevelt’s Winning the West books and Alen Eckert’s Frontiersman novels, which are some of my favorites ever written.  But you can see the impact of high finance in these modern stories, where Indians previously would have been referred to as “savages” because, compared to the immigrants of Western Expansion, they were hostile and vicious.  But in Horizon, they are always, at worst, referred to as “indigenous people.”  Politically, they would dare go no further because the globalist citizen movement behind all financial frontiers would not put up with any reference to “savages” when talking about Indians.  That’s how new wars are fought, and it happens over a long time.  But when you see films like Horizon and what ends up being cut together into a finished form and released to the public by a product of Hollywood like Kevin Costner, you get a good insight into the way that Hollywood lefties think about the matter and what they think ruined the Indians at the cruel hands of incoming immigrants. And you can almost hear the wine glasses banging at a dinner with George Soros and his little boy Alex as they fund the destruction of America with such thoughts about how the Indians were treated and how the white Anglo-Saxon deserves the same fate, and worse.  For anybody to just take it as anything but an act of war is criminal at this point.  The strategy is obvious: globalism is at war with the American citizens, and our government has not done its job in protecting our culture.  They have sponsored illegal immigration, hoping to replace our entire population with immigrants out of revenge for how America was settled to begin with.  Part of that strategy is to poison our culture with drugs and alcohol so that there is nothing left in a few decades to defend America but brain-dead slugs looking for their next hit of drugs to savor intoxication over the benefits of accomplishment.  It all started with an attack, not by tradition but by point of reference from a progressive culture that has as its objective global domination and a one-world rule.  These are the weapons of war from their minds of mayhem, as history has taught them, and they are utilizing them aggressively to this day.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Woke Politics is Killing Disney: We are not “global citizens” we are Americans–the world follows

You can’t kill Indiana Jones. But that is the word from test screenings or previews that are coming out of rough cuts of the movie. And it wouldn’t surprise me that they would try. In this new ESG world for which Disney is offering itself as a leader, killing off an 80s representative of toxic masculinity with a time travel story that ends with Indiana Jones sacrificing himself to the next generation female woke hero is consistent with everything that Kathleen Kennedy has done since she became president of Lucasfilm in 2013. I’m sure George Lucas had good intentions, but he never expected this from his former company and the brands he worked hard to build over many years. For all the reasons he hated corporate filmmaking while trying to finish his famous film, THX-1138, now he is seeing that, left in the hands of corporate control, they could screw up anything. Filmmaking is not a collaborative enterprise, even though that’s what they tell everyone in film school. It is a top-down driver of unique minds who tell other people what to do to obtain a strong vision that audiences can then enjoy. The previous Indiana Jones movies were all from the mind of George Lucas, and that’s what people wanted to see. And what will be interesting about Indiana Jones 5, which is getting some press with about six months until the release in June of 2023, is how different it will be without George Lucas or Steven Spielberg. You can put the same actors, music, and color pallets into a movie, but it won’t be Indiana Jones without George Lucas. And clearly, Kathy Kennedy didn’t understand anything; she thought these popular movies would be vehicles for woke politics and would hold up. But ultimately, audiences will reject them.

I thought the trailer preview looked pretty good, but the problem was it confirmed all the rumors that also indicate that Indiana Jones dies at the end. So like the ESG values of BlackRock have indicated, the way to give audiences a last look at an 80s icon of heroics and toxic masculinity is to erase him from history and to replace him with a woman. Without question, Kathy Kennedy would sign up for that. Whether they stick with that ending after the terrible online reaction is left to be determined. Are they that radical at Disney these days? Well, of course, they are! They are crazy, so I don’t have much hope for the new movie, just as I don’t for the new Avatar film coming up. People don’t want to go to the movies to see woke propaganda and gay rights messages. They want to be free of that, which is one of Indiana Jones’s appeals throughout movie history. But the ESG values of stakeholder capitalism are all about social governance, and Disney has dedicated itself to that leadership, and it is showing in their stock. They have brought back Bob Iger as the CEO to help them make the transition from value-driven content to the traditional way to make good movies; they earn a lot of money at the box office, and Disney is rewarded with a lot of cash. But over the last few years, those values have changed, at least on the corporate side. Driven by Larry Fink and the Klaus Schwab types at the World Economic Forum, stakeholder capitalism is the new value system and a global currency. And Disney expects Bob Iger to navigate that new world in a beneficial way to show other corporations how the stakeholder model will work. So there is much more going on here than Disney killing off one of the most beloved screen heroes of all time. It’s about replacing the value system that western civilization has for this new global view of the world.

But people are people, and what they value won’t change. As Disney has learned with its release of Strange World, which feature a gay plotline for the primary characters, and the weak showing for Black Panther II Wakanda Forever, wokness doesn’t excite people. There was a lot made of Bob Iger’s statements about taking politics out of Disney to repair the brand a bit, but what didn’t get talked about much was that he went on to say that he didn’t believe that Disney was very political. Rather, he saw much of what they were doing as the responsibilities of a “global citizen.” He said that Disney has been telling stories for over 100 years and takes its responsibility to be good global citizens very seriously. And to the ESG values of the World Economic Forum, gender-bending is much more important than box office votes. So Disney is deep into it now. They are off on their projections, and stockholders still measure value in dollars, not ESG scores. And that will continue as we move into 2023, and they find out Avatar won’t make the kind of money they are hoping because nobody wants to waste more than 2 hours on a climate change lecture about nature being more powerful than imagination and productivity. And if Disney sticks with the previews of Indiana Jones that have him being killed, that will kill Disney in ways they can’t even imagine right now. They thought Crystal Skull damaged the Indiana Jones brand. Killing Harrison Ford and replacing him with a woman just isn’t going to work. 

Oh, I wouldn’t mind a female type of Indiana Jones story. I loved Lara Croft until they gave her a stupid bow and arrow instead of the double guns she used to shoot. There is nothing wrong with strong female characters but much wrong with wokeness. And Lara Croft went woke years ago. And yes, the people who want to bring down western civilization and big media companies who have told lots of great stories selling western civilization to the world want to see it all come to an end. Disney these days is a woke company that has permanently damaged its brand. Of course, China and its partners at the World Economic Forum are happy to have that competition removed. But the world is truly at a loss. Yet, people will get over it and move on. They won’t care if there is never a Star Wars movie again. They can live without Indiana Jones. If this movie Indy 5 goes woke the way reports say it is, it will fail, and Disney will further slide down the ESG pit of doom. And Bob Iger won’t be able to save it. Disney was already slipping when he left as CEO just a few weeks before the Covid lockdowns hit in 2020. He knew all about it from the role-playing that went on at Event 201 at the end of 2019. Disney was always built on a house of cards of value that depended entirely on the public sentiment to enjoy the movies. And if Disney isn’t making movies people want to see and instead is committed to woke politics that nobody wants to see, then everything will dry up for them, and their stock will tank. And ESG isn’t going to catch, leaving Bob Iger and the gang holding all the losses for history to remember. People will paint this Indy 5 from their minds, just as many have Crystal Skull. And they’ll live their lives. But Disney will not survive, and Bob Iger looks like he’s going to dig in, much to his own demise. The preview confirmed the rumors, and that has already damaged the brand.

Rich Hoffman

Click to buy The Gunfighter’s Guide to Business