There is a kind of permeating fault wired into the human race that necessitates a need for the aristocracy to have meaning and importance over their peers in the destructive pursuit of self-importance. To my mind, the need for it is like potty training a puppy; the rebellion of defiance of pooping on the floor and then jumping around happily once being scolded that comes from the behavior. They are undeveloped minds broken toward advanced concepts. Unfortunately, human beings have not yet developed a proper understanding of the value of such people because we are still struggling with that emotional development, where praise from our parents and peers in society is all important to us. So, until it’s usually too late, do we come to a proper understanding of the all too tempting notion of measures of importance as understood culturally? When in reality, the opinions of the masses are rooted in an undeveloped brain functioning from elements of insanity. We’re talking about the top 1%, as they are often called, or the “elite,” as the media calls them. They are usually the people most successful in some measurements, but they all have social dysfunction in common. A switch in their minds that never fully develops gives them the appearance of social maturity, but in practice, they are still unrestricted with critical thinking, which might otherwise guide them toward other decisions. And because we have never come to grips with this fundamental insecurity that most people have, the social illusion that is the byproduct is that these people are more critical in a social hierarchy, which then promotes these same people to obtain an aristocratic status with ruthlessness and destructive utterances. In my experience, people who are in the top 1% in our society economically or politically tend to have severe problems in emotional development where the parts of their brains that tell them their problems shouldn’t do something, is undeveloped making them a liability, not a true asset to all social discourse.
Because we mistake those traits for power and control as virtues, we have not dealt with the core problem of these people other than modes of philosophy that are just as destructive toward a prosperous society, such as Marxism. The struggle for personal power and its impact on the rest of the world is a long struggle that has always been with us. But to my mind, our present time is turning the corner toward those assumptions, which is the real merit behind all populism occurring worldwide. The old idea that a few ruling elites, whether it be a king, a CEO, a politician, a business tycoon, or some other single-point personality, would rule over the masses of society like a shepherd over a flock of sheep is finally dying in our present time, and that has led to mass confusion about the merits of leadership. What is it, and how does society function with it or without it? For all this time, the traits that built an aristocracy were valued as special and unique when, in fact, they were essentially broken people who had not yet entirely developed the aspect of their emotional development where such peer acceptance and yearning were not part of a functioning intellect. As in the example of the puppy, they are not yet potty trained in the world, and their minds are not yet ready to guide anybody toward anything. That was one of the most important developments of the American system of government, to decentralize authority so that the ill effects of that broken 1% would have less impact on mass society than in other places in the world at different times throughout history.
Generally, as a culture, Americans resent being told what to do by a centralized figure, more so than other places in the world that have not yet tasted full autonomy of thought. So they have not yet realized how much better a society is when aristocratic fools are not guiding it from a monastery or corporate influence where the desire for power over many people corrupts the minds of the few in rule over the masses and the perceived power that comes with it. A truly developed mind with a healthy intellect doesn’t crave that kind of power, so a lack of aristocracy is far more beneficial than having one. It has taken a long time to arrive at this place, and it took America to give birth to it, but finally, in the world, populism has grown into this expansion beyond the control of the few over the many that have always previously persisted. So now it is fashionable to question authority and the “elite” who have been running things as long as humans have attempted to organize mass society. When you get a human being that does not crave power over others, you can be said to be a culture that is being born into a healthy intellect, and its evolution is quite natural and inevitable. But it’s devastating to those who thought it was acceptable, even those who desired to be those undeveloped few who craved power to fill the vast vacancies of their emotional learning in society. What is happening now is truly terrifying to them. But then again so are little puppies terrified when they are scolded for pissing on the carpet. Just because the puppies are cute doesn’t mean they don’t get hit with the newspaper for leaving their bodily discharge in the walking path of the true owners of a home.
So, most of the crying that is going on now comes from those little dogs of our society who are whimpering from being scolded. They thought they were in charge, just like all undeveloped minds assume until they learn the truth. And for those broken adults who never quite develop, this behavior is more of a retardation, rather than a value. Still at wine tastings and other social gatherings usually assembled by Democrat types of personalities, the old aristocracy is still a valued commodity, and they crave the leadership of a shepherd in their daily affairs because they, too, lack the confidence to approach life on their own merits. They prefer to have someone to think for them, and there are always these undeveloped 1% types, “this elite,” who step forward to take on the role. But most people grow out of such needs to be led and rule over others because their minds no longer value such things once they fully mature. Yet, such a distinction would have never been made if not for America to provide such an example, where aristocracy and rule over others was not a value system but a rejected premise. It continues to be the guiding light for populism worldwide, where more people crave to be wolves in their own right, not sheep looking for a shepherd. Those craving to be our shepherds are often let down by personal failures, which then prevent a healthy society from reaching its true potential. It was always the perceived “elite” who were the broken minds who got in the way. And now, in the long evolution of the human race, we are finally growing away from such immature desires. And our society is improving, even if it is scary to those who thought they were in charge all along. They are finding out that they never were and never will be.
Rich Hoffman
Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707
The Overmanwarrior 