The Chinese Communism of Godzilla X Kong: Their anti-capitalist messages are obvious and dangerous to our youth

I was happy to have the chance to take my family to the new movie Godzilla X Kong: The New Empire.  That’s what movies are all about, that film.  Fun, adventurous, made for a big screen with the lights turned out and lots of popcorn to eat.  For my grandkids, they’ll say that this new Godzilla movie was their favorite movie ever.  And why not, from their perspective?  For what it was, this new Godzilla movie with King Kong was a classic, fun film, and to have an experience like that with my family is a treasure beyond average measures.  However, I am not at all happy with the Chinese ownership of Legendary Studios because there is a lot more behind the scenes that indicates a pro-communist message that cannot be ignored.  I’ve discussed it before, returning to an early entry in these Godzilla/Kong movies with Skull Island.  Under the Chinese owners, they took the raw and crazy primitive humans from Skull Island and turned them into wise natives living in harmony with nature.  A strategy that the Chinese have utilized on many fronts to promote anti-capitalist sentiment and advance their brand of communism to the rest of the world by attaching that message to young people who would grow up to accept such notions.  So, over time, the way that the native inhabitants of Skull Island have been viewed has changed from a Western position to a far Eastern one.  And under Legendary Studios, there was undoubtedly politics behind the message.  Was it too much for a movie like this?  I don’t think it ruins it completely.  But it is undoubtedly something to notice and understand what and why it’s happening.  It’s always great to watch giant monsters destroy significant human landmarks.  But, under Chinese ownership of Hollywood studios, we can’t ignore what they are trying to do under the soft sell of a monster movie intended for children. 

Featured in this movie, and introduced in the first Godzilla v. Kong movie, is the last of her race, a little girl from the Iwi tribe who can talk to the giant ape with sign language because she is also deaf.  She’s a friendly kid and a likable character, and taking it alone isn’t a big deal of conspiracy. But, the way the Iwi are portrayed in Godzilla X Kong is pretty ridiculous, tapping into this notion that I see quite often in the markets of mysticism and New Age mentality, where ancient cultures like Atlantis and Lemuria had it all together and were far superior to modern humans because they lived in harmony with nature, and now we have lost all that to our detriment.  And that lost in the core of the Earth is the lost tribe of the Iwi, this little girl’s ancestors who keep all these things balanced with nature as if nature had a logic far superior to the human race.   They even went so far in this movie to indicate that this lost wisdom allowed the descendants of the Iwi to make the giant pyramids we see on earth today by moving rocks around through gravity manipulation by working with nature, not against it.  The science presented in Godzilla X Kong is essentially the agenda for any climate summit of progressive radicalism seen anywhere in the world, from Dubai to Rio and all fancy vacation destinations in general, and is grotesquely out of step with reality.   But they figure that in a world where education is so poor and people so gullible to the truth, why not present such things as facts?

I like the old versions of Skull Island, not just in the 1933 original King Kong movie but also in Peter Jackson’s 2005 movie with the same title.  The way the West sees natives is great.  But the way communists see natives is not.  There is a political agenda to indicate that the collective notions of complete submission to authority rule are superior.  In the case of the communists, and as shown in Godzilla X Kong, there is a kind of queen of the tribe that represents complete submission of individual will toward the collective group as the ideal society.  Whereas in the classic versions of the Skull Island inhabitants, they were shown to be cannibals and primitive beyond help.  It was a tragedy in those films to sacrifice a pretty woman to the beast to appease their god, hoping to leave them alone.  Such ignorance was looked down upon.  But not in these modern Legendary Studios monster movies.  Complete irreverence to individuality is their goal, not a matter of terror.  Of course, the message is not hidden; communist governments want to sell to the public the benefit of being submissive toward centralized government at the cost of all individuality.  In the end, the message of these modern monster movies is that all the great things humans have built, like the city of Rome and the pyramids at Giza, can quickly be brought down by these giant monsters.  And they are acts of nature meant to be submitted to, not fought against.  So why bother?  The human race’s efforts are discouraged in these movies, and we discover that even with all our technology, we were never in charge, so most of our efforts were wasted from the start.  The Iwi tribe always had it right. 

Of course, that is all wrong, and so long as we look at these things with the kind of reverence that we would a show like Gilligan’s Island, this is harmless entertainment.  But never mistake the Chinese government’s purposeful intentions in buying Hollywood studios and their desire to capture the message given to us in a darkened theater and kids too young to know any better.  We should not have allowed the Chinese to buy up so much of our American assets, especially in entertainment.  If ancient cultures had it all together, they wouldn’t have gone extinct, such as Atlantis, and other societies would have long been wiped away.  I think there was a lot lost in the past, but politically, the cause wasn’t more collectivist behavior but in less of it.  In any society that turns toward centralized government to alleviate their fears of the unknown.  That looks to be the cause of much of the trouble in the past and in what has been lost and found again time and time over.  It is not the reverse, as presented in these Legendary Studio movies.  In truth, there is a lot of archaeology that needs to be done in China, but under their closed system of communist tyranny, that isn’t even on the table.  So who are they to say anything about ancient cultures but to feed the pot-smoking belief that the hippies of history knew more than our greedy capitalists of the modern world about how to live within its rules and regulations?  But they say it anyway to poison our youth with ideas of ideal society run by communist governments, even as those communist governments sit on some of the most fascinating ancient monuments in the history of the world. It is concealed behind a veil of communism to analyze the outside world.  And the understanding only free people can interpret.  But that’s a story for another day. 

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707

Kong Skull Island at Universal Studios: At least its monsters and not a bunch of gay Disney propaganda

Needless to say, the timing couldn’t be better for me.  I have traveled a lot and been to many different places—around the world—but I can honestly say that there is no place on earth that I’d rather visit for vacation than Orlando, Florida. If I were given the option to take a $100,000 vacation to the Mediterranean or to have an all expense trip paid to Orlando to visit the several major theme parks there—I’d pick Orlando.  I have said much about my love of those amusement parks in Central Florida and it looks like through competition the great minds designing new attractions at those parks are giving fans everything they could hope and dream of.  I am of course talking about the Skull Island exhibit at Universal Studios Islands of Adventure.  I am absolutely enthralled by the prospect of that ride and attraction because when it comes to movie monsters—King Kong has always been my favorite—followed very closely by Godzilla. So this is exciting news to me.   Then of course is the Star Wars land that is opening at Hollywood Studios over the next couple of years.  I have my concerns about Star Wars—and my hope is that they’ll right their ship before that exhibit is completed—but I at least am hopeful at this time that they’ll do a great job.

It is a shame that Disney as a company has decided to take this exciting period and attempt to shove progressive ideas down the throats of their fans.  When I showed my wife the footage of what Disney did on their ABC television show Once Upon a Time she declared that she would never buy anything from Disney again.  It is one thing to put up with and not discriminate against gay people—but it is quite another to flamboyantly endorse the “lifestyle” and Disney is certainly guilty of that. Uncle Walt would be sick with rage at what his company is doing in regards to gay advocacy.   It’s not at all a family friendly strategy and it’s an insult to those of us who wouldn’t otherwise think twice about spending a $10,000 vacation there to give our families a good—wholesome time.  While at Disney World I don’t want ANY references to sex—especially gay sex.  I want higher concepts and heroic effort—not gayness.  I can tell Disney this—as much as I love Disney World—if they continue on with this gay pride crap—we won’t be spending voluminous amounts of money on their company any more.  My family has been big supporters of the Disney Company over the years—as recently as last week.  We attended a birthday party and it was all about Disney for gifts and balloons.  If Disney doesn’t pull in the gayness—I won’t go to their parks ever again—even though I might want to see their latest inventions.

Universal Studios is not a conservative company—they have their progressive trends as well, but they avoid getting into trouble with it.  Regarding the recent Jurassic World movie the characters were noticeably very traditional within reason.  Chris Pratt was very much an “A” type male who had a clear relationship with women.  If they had decided to muddy the water and have members of the same-sex involved with Chris Pratt from a sexual attraction standpoint—I would have a much different feeling about Jurassic World.  Call it homophobic, call it the acts of a hater—call it whatever you want.  I don’t want to see gayness in my stories.  I don’t want to see it at my vacation destinations.  And I don’t want it around me in public.  Keep it in the bedroom and don’t put it in front of my face.  With all that said, Universal Studios is certainly better at walking the line between social activism and traditional family behavior than Disney is—and their amusement parks currently are doing a better job of providing a safe environment for families.  Maybe that is because the bar is lower for Universal than Disney—as Disney is known for its family friendly material.  But I find myself much more excited right now for Kong: Skull Island than for the new Star Wars land at Hollywood Studios.

I have zero interest in seeing the new Avatar land at Disney’s Animal Kingdom.  Avatar is one of the most progressive films I’ve ever seen and even though up to that point I was a James Cameron fan—he ruined his reputation with me on that project.  Technically, Avatar was a beautiful film—but the anti capitalist message in the movie was just despicable.  Avatar celebrated tribalism and the whole global warming environmental message—and it was just sickening.  It is almost as gross as the gay agenda—the proposal that earth is a living conscience superseding human invention.   Its one thing to appreciate nature—it’s quite another to worship it.  Avatar is about worshiping nature—and I’m not into that.  Mankind should look at nature and think of it as paint for which it can make magnificent art.  Nature is a foundation for thought—not a dominate force against it.  So I may never go to Animal Kingdom to see the Avatar exhibit.  Not the best decision in the world for Disney execs.

But relatively safe from political contention is King Kong and the mythology of Skull Island.  We don’t have to worry about homosexual sex and environmental messages with monsters wanting to kill us—so it makes for a nice comfortable, thrilling adventure that you expect while on vacation.  Nobody wants to be lectured to about progressive politics if they are Midwestern conservatives spending many thousands of dollars on a vacation experience.  And there are a lot more of those Midwestern conservatives than there are progressive homosexuals and urban rap artists.  I understand that these large entertainment companies want to be as inclusive as possible so not to turn away the potential for making a good ol’ dollar, but in cases of politics, they have to pick their poison.  They can’t have it both ways.  Don’t put sexual lifestyles in front of us then expect good conservative Christians seeking strong family values to put up with the intrusion on their life. Nobody wants to spend $235 dollars a night to stay at a Disney hotel to see a bunch of rainbow gay people running around ruining the environment.  At Skull Island, there is no fear of gay themes because it’s all about monsters and destruction, and that is something to look forward to.

So it is just a little exciting to have the prospect of visiting Skull Island at Universal Studios Islands of Adventure—and I hope to see the major improvements to their Jurassic Park section of the part rolled into the mix.  It doesn’t get much better than dinosaurs and giant monsters and I will spend a lot of money to support that kind of thing.  When I’m on vacation I don’t want to see a bunch of fairies, and gay people—and I certainly don’t want to be lectured to about environmentalism.  That is why Universal Studios is pulling out in front of Disney in the theme park business.  Even though Disney is a sentimental favorite—Disney has shot itself in the foot with their progressivism.  Would Harry Potter be as popular as it is if Harry fell in love with a guy as opposed to a girl—of course not?  With such love and fairy tales there is always the promise of happily ever after with children and a continuation of the family name when romance is developed in a story.  But with gay people—it’s just sex—the love goes nowhere and as a plot device—is pointless.  Universal has filled its theme parks with superheroes, robots, and stunning action rides that allow visitors to truly feel like they are getting away from the outside world.  But more and more at Disney are the reminders of their pro-gay protests against state legislation in Georgia and North Carolina.  They are too progressively active to appeal to the American conservative base and it is starting to show.  I know if I feel the way I do about them, then others are not far behind.  With that consideration, Skull Island is looking more appealing than Star Wars right now—because I have a very strong hunch that Disney is about to ruin Star Wars with a gay story line just as they are with their Once Upon a Time television series.

I don’t have to worry about gay plot lines with King Kong and that is wonderful.  But if King Kong suddenly becomes about gay monkey sex—then I’m done with him too.  I don’t care how cool the monsters looks—I’ll be done with King Kong the moment he wants to play with another giant ape’s ding dong.  Because that kind of emotional stuff just isn’t cool.  Monsters that want to kill each other for dominance is—and for that reason I’m really looking forward to Skull Island at Universal Studios, Florida.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.