Like a voodoo priestess sprinkling blood from the cut off head of a chicken upon a sidewalk making shapes in tribute to the shadow gods, the Zombies of Lakota have come up with a new slogan for their 2013 tax increase campaign, “For Lakota.” The zombies of that cult ridden school district in Southern Ohio would have voters believe that a sacrifice of higher taxes would be to the benefit of the community when in fact it is only “For Lakota.” The zombies would have all believe that their campaign is for the kids of the school, but in reality it is only “For Lakota.” The concept of sacrifice to the mysticism of superstition is the cornerstone of the levy zombie argument as logic is the victim of their offering. The tax increases the Levy Zombies propose in the upcoming election are sacrifices by the community “For Lakota,” for teacher contracts, for political union control, for price-fixing, and for the pervert teachers who prey on the children who innocently attend the school.
As the yard signs in favor of tax increases pop up like zits on the face of an unfortunate teenager, the message of “For Lakota” has many meanings. But the primary one is sacrifice. Sacrifice to the gods of academia and their teacher’s union. It is they who drive up the cost of education and require the sacrifice of the community to sustain their blood thirsty cult of thoughtless zombies. It is “For Lakota” that the wealth of the community residing around the Lakota school district is tossed hoping through superstition that children will miraculously become smarter, more independent, and functional adults when the grim reality is that they are bred to be thoughtless hominids half dead to the world around them.
When signs displaying “For Lakota” pop up in a neighborhoods across Liberty Township and West Chester beware, a Lakota Levy Zombie resides there and will attempt to toss everything they can of value into the pit of fire the way South Pacific cannibal tribes tossed their virgin daughters to the fire gods residing in the lava pits of a volcano. Among all these primates, the voodoo priest, the volcano cannibals, and the Lakota levy zombie, they all declare the need for sacrifice to satisfy their appetites for destruction. In the case of Lakota it is the loss of fiscal value that they seek, not just the blood of a living being. One type of parasite seeks the life energy of the human being; the other seeks the lifeblood of an economy. But they both thrive off social sacrifice for the greater good—their good. 
When the signs stating “For Lakota” are seen remember that the displayer believes in this brand of sacrifice, and that their intellects are no different from the slack-jawed cannibal which haunts the remote islands of the South Pacific. Only these sacrificial parasitic zombies of Lakota are worse because they look and smell like normal people, but they are far from it. The best way to recognize their treachery is to look for yards where “For Lakota” is displayed. Upon such places the Zombies of Lakota reside.
Rich Hoffman
Give yourself the gift of ADVENTURE. CLICK HERE!
The Overmanwarrior 
A few years ago I attended a Lakota board meeting and Sandy Wheatly presided as the president of the board. Many parents were there to object to the very sexually explicit book by Maya Angelou – “I know Why the Caged Bird Sings.” The English department deemed the book beneficial to the young and impressionable teens that were required to read it. Not only is the book perversely sexual, but it also puts the stamp of approval of lying, stealing and the very humanistic belief that “the end justifies the means” I was disgusted to see union members there en masse demanding that the book be allowed and defending the choice. Unfortunately these union members were not professional at all. Most of them wore flip flops, shorts and t-shirts. The parents did try to be reasonable at their request for a more appropriate book for the students. Of course Kathy Klink, Sandy Wheatly, Joan Powel and one other parent/board member were all for keeping the book in the curriculum. Two board members, Roger Jeters and Helen Shumacher questioned the choice, but of course the vote went to keep the book on the shelves. The compromise was to keep the book in the library. Hillary Clinton’s remark, “what difference, at this point, does it make? ” seems so applicable and could have been a quote from Sandy Wheatly who vehemently defended the teacher’s right to choose any book.. Sandy just happens to be a minister’s wife. I always wondered what kind of moral values she taught in her Sunday school classes. Also, another point, it really doesn’t matter what the parents think or want except at levy time.
LikeLike
Wonderful, insightful point. Many of the levy supporters this time around were still kids when that happened, so they have no context to the evil they are supporting.
LikeLike
I think I read that book back in high school, and I attended a Parochial high school. I’m not sure I was any better or worse off for reading it. I am sure our teachers and the Archdiocese felt there was some reason it was important to read, along with other “banned books.”
LikeLike
The book selection is even worse today. If it isn’t sex and gore or both, the teachers don’t seem to think it will be of interest to the students. We had to study Shakespere in high school. It was boring to most of us, but traditional English literature seems to be ignored. The point is that multiculturalism and the fact that Angelou was a cult favorite doesn’t make that book a work of art and something to emulate. Maybe if the students were encouraged to read examples of goodness they would learn more than the poor choices of Angelou and her mother.
LikeLike
This was 10 years ago, but we read Shakespeare, Angelou, Steinbeck, Bradbury, du Maurier, Dickens, Sinclair, Fitzgerald, McCarthy (Cormac), and on and on. I am sure at one time, things could be found at fault with anyone of the authors and their stories/novels. These are books that are taught across public and private education. Novels are just like anything else in our society, whether it is media or video games, that we are independent and should be able to draw our own conclusions from them. I read the Communist Manifesto in college as part of my economics studies. Did I agree with it? Absolutely not, but it was important to read to understand so that I could make valid arguments against that theory. The same could be said about any of the other texts, as I may not agree with the other texts I have read. Call me crazy, but I feel it is important to understand other points of view so I can see why I disagree or agree with them. To simply shun it, I feel, makes you more ignorant. I do not always agree with Rich, but does that mean I shouldn’t read his posts and comment? Absolutely not. Its our duty to educate ourselves with a multitude of views, otherwise we would just live in a world of indoctrination. I also ready many books in school that portrayed a world view of what society deemed was acceptable, so I was exposed to contrasting viewpoints.
Can you imagine Mad Men being produced and broadcast in the era in which it was about? Absolutely not, as society and the media said we cannot show that, even though it was going on. Was society better off for hiding the truth from itself? I would say not, and we are better off not having a world view that only portrays we are better than we really are.
LikeLike
Though, my favorite book we read was “The Frontiesmen” by Allan Eckert, which is an unbelievable tale about the founding of this region, as it included stories about Kenton, Clark, Boone, St. Clair, Anthony, Girty and W.H. Harrison. As well, stories about the Shawnee tribe. Its gritty, messy and gory; just like those times were and gives you a real appreciation for their sacrifices.
LikeLike
I love…………….and I mean LOVE……….that book. Not many people around anymore who talk about that one. A classic, especially in the area we live in.
LikeLike
I know!!! I gave it to my father-in-law for Christmas a couple years ago, and its now one of his favorites too. I cannot wait to share it with my son, so he can see what real sacrifice and turmoil was. It just gives you such a good sense of our history in this area. I know there are historically fictional parts, as Eckert wasn’t alive then and no one was around to share the stories. But, his attention to detail is just absolutely stunning.
LikeLike
I’ll be sure it gets carried on a few more generations 😉
LikeLike
The point is that the room was full of parents that rejected the content of the book and the teachers union demonstrated against the parents. In government schools parents don’t count. Private schools have to respond to the parents who do pay the tuition. Amalot, you do sound like an advocate for the union using the passive – agressive methods that have worked so well for them. I am well versed in the Delphi Technique and by jove, I think you’re an expert. Case closed.
LikeLike
Feel free to call me AJ… I am not sure how I was supporting the union, as I was just stating my opinion about that book and others like it. I would have been in grade school or high school still when it sounds like this specific issue was addressed. And, if you think my opinions or views are disingenuous and driven by the others here, I am more than happy to discuss any specific topic or issue.
LikeLike
There are quite a few “change agents” (its and Alinsky technique for those who don’t know) who have been working a different angle, especially during the last two months. I have an email box full of them. But regardless, I enjoy debate and thought. The ultimate change agent is logic. Even those ruined by a failed philosophy can change sides when the truth is understood.
LikeLike
I agree completely… When you sit down and really study an issue, you can change your perspective. I comment for myself, and represent no one but myself. I am more than happy to send a link to my FB page, and you can see all the “crazy” things I post, like Cincinnati Reds articles and pictures of my photography.
LikeLike