I feel very comfortable in saying that I believe the lost civilization of Atlantis, as Plato described it, is best reflected in what remains of the North American mound cultures, and that a significant portion of that culture ultimately ended up in the Ohio Valley. And I can say that because it is very controversial and challenging, given our previous assumptions, because I think it’s one of the best examples of the failures of institutional thinking, which I find repulsive, defective, and socially corrosive. To illustrate the shortcomings of institutional thinking, the story of Atlantis is a perfect example. At this point, given all that is known, I believe the timing is right to discuss it, well ahead of the eventual realization that will follow. I have a pretty good track record in these kinds of matters, and part of that credential is demonstrating the ability to see things far ahead and to be right about them. At this point, I think it’s wise to say that the mound builders of North America can best help us understand the lost civilizations of Atlantis and Mu. However, we also see them all over England and South America, with a mound culture that utilized the science of geometric shapes to establish a relationship with supernatural forces as part of their technology, deeply committed to star power. Our previous assumptions have been incorrect, and this is important to establish because when we talk politically about a “Native American,” what are we talking about? I would propose that the evidence shows that a Native American was a native of the homeland of Atlantis and that by the time Columbus followed a bunch of old maps already well chronicled to North America, those cultures had been in decline for many thousands of years and had fallen back into groups of warring nomads hunting and gathering for basic sustenance.

It’s such a big idea that I have seriously been considering obtaining a PhD to drive the point home, because credentials help an established culture trust information that can be rattling to their foundational beliefs. My problem with that is the time involved to do so. My schedule is already too busy for a task like that just to help people understand the inevitable. However, the idea that the Clovis people emerged into North America and settled in the manner that pre-Columbian archaeology has established is, at this point, preposterous. It’s also important to understand why, so that we don’t carry over the same traits into other parts of our lives. This is something that has bothered me for a long time. And it became much more so after I visited Stonehenge and saw that essentially the earthworks there were identical to what I saw in my hometown of Ohio where there are a lot of mound structures that are not for burials, but ritual significance dedicated to a culture using occult technology that had already been well established before building them. There are thousands of them, everywhere, that the social structure of a shaman-based society communicating with the spirit world was not an anomaly, but an accepted culture with an intense past, dating back 250,000 years to just before the last Ice Age. We had a global civilization that spread across the world, utilizing occult technology that is still evident in methods of magic and sorcery, which persist in pockets here and there, and in speculation. However, the proof lies in the mounds of the world and their often very complicated alignments with stars, which utilized a form of communication that was more than just superstitious for them. It was a significant part of their lives, and it was global in scope, not regional.

Of course, the central point is to assume that there could never have been an Atlantis civilization because the established sciences have already established the timeline for all human beings. According to them, established science suggests that humans originated from the Indus Valley, Mesopotamia, and Egypt, approximately 6000 to 4000 years ago, and evolved into the technological world we see today. I am saying that the evidence suggests that what was well chronicled in the Bible were the last remnants of a previous culture that had existed for hundreds of thousands of years, perhaps even millions, and that their entire society was built around occult technology. Not mysticism, but actual utilization of supernatural forces, and they formed their whole belief structure along those lines until Yahweh put an end to it and built the Jewish people to rebel against the premise of that whole, global culture. However, this is the point of view of the Book of Genesis, where the culture God wanted to destroy wasn’t just a few hundred years of emergence. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was not a blip on the surface of the earth, erased just as fast in a catastrophe. They are likely many tens of thousands of years old, and the evidence for it is literally everywhere, and only hidden by institutional assumptions provided by the frail moorings of academic society. To challenge that foundation, it is necessary to shake the foundation of other assumptions that are just as ridiculous. The point of the matter is to establish the value of thinking outside the box on many things. We can initiate this process with a premise like Atlantis, and likely many other ancient cultures that predate our known assumptions by a significant period.

Even in our modern understanding of Freemasonry, it is well discussed that the Hermetic society emerged from the lost continent of Atlantis, which is why Plato was interested in the topic, and that the civilization of Egypt emerged directly from it. But I would say, based on what we know about the mound cultures, Egypt wasn’t the only place. And even in North America, we see the same kind of rebellion against it emerging with the same sort of Hebrew law and order rising to overthrow that old technology. It wasn’t just in the Newark holy stones that we see this, but in earthworks that have clear indications of Jewish influence. And I am saying now that I’ve seen enough to say that I think this is how it will all go down. We have discovered the lost civilization of Atlantis, and what remains of it is reflected in the North American mound culture. It’s everywhere around the world, but was most evident along the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers due to the extremely high concentration of earthen structures aligned with the stars. We know that Atlantis failed long before a natural catastrophe supposedly sank it in the Atlantic Ocean; it had become corrupted by magicians and sorcerers who exported their thoughts around the world well before there was ever an ice age. Most of their civilization has long since eroded. However, what remained were their beliefs and technologies, which emerged in the mound-building culture and can still be observed. What has lasted is just a fraction of what it once was. However, it’s enough for us to ask the obvious questions and challenge our previous assumptions. And I think for our own good, we need to shatter those previous assumptions and the thought process that created them. The Atlantis story is a good example of why we need to do that, because the process will help us with many other things, unlocking many better attributes of modern culture that we had not previously considered.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707