These are my kind of girls. Who said Donald Trump didn’t do well with women? Ted Cruz does well with women, but not in the right way—sounds like he has serious problems—which Diamond and Silk do a wonderful service to break down for their viewers.
What was that Glenn Beck said about Ted Cruz—he’d drop him in a minute if any of these sex stories was true—but that he didn’t believe Ted had any “game” with women? Hmmmmm, sounds like Ted has more game than he let on. What are you gonna’ do now Beck?
I’m not a big fan because often degenerates, welfare recipients, and the type of people who are most at home on the Jerry Springer Show populate the premises—but Wal-Mart in Fairfield, Ohio off Princeton Rd by Bridgewater Falls is finding itself the victim of progressive attack. In spite of my feelings about the place and the people it attracts, I think what Wal-Mart does is wonderful as a retail outlet. There are many more good things than bad; I’m just not a fan of the place because of the people who are often there. Take them all away, and I enjoy going there. Put me at Wal-Mart on a crowded Saturday to pick up mulch, and I’m not a happy person. But my wife is, she has shopped there for the entire time it has been in that location and it helped raise our family with food options that made it much easier for her to be a stay-at-home mom. One thing about my wife, she is intensely loyal, so she loves that particular Wal-Mart because it has been good for helping her raise her family with low-cost options over the many years. She likes the people who work there and finds their company refreshing—mostly because many of them are older people—whom she typically gets along well with. Since she is a housewife, she is able to go to Wal-Mart during the day when most people are working—and typically has a good experience.
But on March 29th, 2016 the foundations of her reality were shaken to her very core. She had been there to spend quite a lot of money, she bought most of our food for the week, some other items and had picked up a $300 pair of glasses from the optometrist. It was a hefty bill to pay and she was enjoying spending the money at a store she believed in—to her Wal-Mart represents raw American value—red, white, and blue patriotism—getting the most products for the lowest cost—lack of unionized labor and goods and services all under one roof. You can get your eyes checked, a pharmaceutical order fulfilled and have your tires changed all while you shop for groceries, lawn supplies, and pick-up wonderful toys for the grandchildren. But to her shock for the first time in nearly 15 years, she stepped up to the check-out and only one lane was open—because it was the middle of a weekday and there wasn’t a need for multiple lanes to be open—and what she found was a transsexual kid dressed in blue lipstick, short black hair, a push-up bra, and a black skirt working the cash register. She had no choice but to go through his lane and she was very pissed off about it.
For context, we choose to live in an area of the country where we don’t have to deal with derelicts like this. As a couple, we don’t go to areas of the city where gay bars are prominent; we don’t hang out on college campuses, and we don’t go to music concerts where these kinds of people are increasingly commonplace. Even though I like Key West, we don’t hang out on Duval Street late at night where transsexuals, homosexuals, and transvestites are populating every street corner on the south end. We don’t go to Fantasy Fest there—where middle-aged repressed sociopaths with above average incomes can frolic in the decadence of a Romanian orgy. We don’t watch television shows that embrace those types of progressive attributes outside of male and female monogamous relationships. We don’t want that kind of crap in our life, and we make choices to avoid it. So it was quite a shock to my wife to have to deal one on one with such a progressive disaster—a full-fledged transsexual that was so flamboyant about his imposition in our community, that he was audaciously challenging anybody to “judge” him incorrectly—because he was protected by law to be an imbecile. It wasn’t alright with her.
She endured the experience while transacting with the boy but shortly before leaving she just felt disgusted. So she proceeded to the customer service area to take back all her items and get her money back because she didn’t want to give money to a company that supported such behavior. She was appalled utterly. Of course the manager spoke to her and he basically stated that legally they were paralyzed from discriminating against the kid and that if they did, they feared a lawsuit—which I understand is exactly the case. The law handed down by Supreme courts both state and federal have given us these impositions and my wife was furious about it because now it was in her own back yard. The kid knew he was protected by law to harass the sensibilities of normal, average, good-hearted American morality, and she was fuming with anger over it. She gathered up the contact information to speak to corporate headquarters to complain then she headed to the optometrist to take back her very nice new glasses.
Luckily, the lady working the counter was a levelheaded older person who calmed her down. I won’t go into the details of what the lady told my wife—because I don’t want to get her into legal trouble—but the short story is this—the other employees working that day agreed with my wife—only they weren’t allowed to say anything about the kid. They were forced to put up with the little scum bag. By law, they have had their First Amendment rights taken away from them—the transsexual was allowed to harass everyone else, but nobody was allowed to harass him—by law. And Wal-Mart’s hands were tied behind their back while progressive attacks of middle-America punched them square in the face.
In the future, my wife simply won’t buy anything if she has to deal with people like that kid. He shouldn’t be anywhere that customers have to interact with him. This whole episode reminded me of a trip my family took to the Mellow Mushroom in West Chester. I like the pizza there, but often find the environment too progressive for my tastes. Now since Pies and Pints has opened at Liberty Center we choose to go there for fresh pizza instead of the Mellow Mushroom just because that Liberty Center environment is much more conservative. To be honest, when I am spending $70 to $100 dollars on food I expect an attractive waitress—and by attractive, I’d like her to be a young college girl with good hygiene, speaks in complete sentences, isn’t covered in tattoos and body piercings and is well within the appropriate weight for her height. If I end up with a guy, he needs to look well-groomed, have short hair without dandruff, and speak respectively. Usually it’s not a problem, and it’s certainly not sexual—it’s just that beat up old wrecks are not pleasant to be around. Younger people are like new cars off the assembly line, and when you are going out to eat, you want to see new cars, not vehicles ready for the junk yard. If we wanted to see that, we’d just stay home. Chili’s is particularly good about having a nice mix of such people—their recruiting is obviously successful. They can’t discriminate, but they manage to create a competitive environment to weed out the undesirables. But at the Mellow Mushroom of course they get progressive kids applying because the environment attracts those types of people—and that is the biggest turn-off for me. On one occasion, we had an openly gay waiter and he drove me nuts. He was so flamboyant that I almost left—he was really pushing the whole gay thing commenting on my daughter’s clothing along with sucking up to my wife. Of course, by reading this, you can get a sense of her state of mind. She hasn’t wanted to go back there since. I have under professional circumstances, but she hasn’t. We tend to vote with our feet, so these progressive trends have an impact on a company’s bottom-line. I considered the $150 dollars we spent there that day to be completely wasted money. We would have had much more fun popping in a frozen pizza into the oven at home—because at least then we wouldn’t have some gay guy hitting on us and doing who-knows-what to our food between the kitchen and our table.
That is precisely why progressive activists have pushed to have protected legislation allowing kids like that Wal-Mart transsexual to come into our neighborhoods and assault our sensibilities, but they expect not to receive any fire back in return. They—being the progressive activists deliberately dressing up in blue lipstick and a skirt with a push-up bra to work as cashier at Wal-Mart—intend harm to the lifestyle my wife and I have chosen for ourselves. They will of course say that we are being “judgmental” and are advocating “hate speech” because the law has empowered them with such beliefs. What the legal system and the politics that has shaped it neglect is that being “judgmental” is one of the greatest attributes of living as a human being. Progressive activists and the legal system are demanding that we stop thinking and just accept these incursions against tradition, and in my family, that is not acceptable. Not at all. If scum bags like this transsexual kid want to flaunt themselves in front of our faces, there will be consequences. They don’t have a right to impose themselves on our sensibilities. If they want to do what they do, they have a right—but through competition, we must have options to avoid them. I suggested to my wife that she not shop at Wal-Mart, that she stay in places where the prices are higher and along with them, the expectations of the clientele. But honestly, the Kroger Marketplace in Liberty Township has more than its share of these degenerates shopping there—the situation is endemic to the progressive incursion cast upon us by a political class that wishes to destroy the American family. She loves that particular Wal-Mart, so she wasn’t open to that idea. In the future if she doesn’t have options to avoid people like that transsexual employee, she just won’t shop that day. And that’s the way it’s going to be. When we go out to dinner, we don’t want a bunch of silly boys prancing around like girls expecting a 17% tip with their hands all over our food—and we don’t want to exchange money with people who look like their hands are disgusting—because if they dress that way—god only knows where their hands have been. We don’t claim to be modern or hip, we don’t like these changes to the family structure of American society and short of invoking an Amish privilege toward tradition—we certainly won’t be endorsing such lifestyles under any circumstances—especially, with our hard-won money. It is a shame that companies like Wal-Mart are so terrified of the legal implications of such justified discrimination based on sound judgment. Because if there were any justice in this world—those types of things wouldn’t happen in our town. I can see them happening in places writhe with filth, like Las Vegas, Key West, and the various swingers clubs around the world—but not in a family rich environment like Butler County. The legislators who allowed such things to happen should be ashamed of themselves for not having more courage to stand against progressive activists. Because that leaves the dirty work to people like me—which is not what we hired you politicians to do in the first place—cave to the worst among us, so that the good would have to just endure the folly.
This has never been more evident than in the city of Detroit—utterly destroyed by socialism. Chicago is not far behind and is currently propped up exclusively by debt incurrence. Chicago doesn’t have the wealth building ability to pay their debts at the rate that they are acquiring them. But they are small potatoes compared to California—which was once one of the great economies of the world. Now it’s quickly on its way to becoming an empty husk of what it once was and now they have delivered to themselves one of the final nails into their coffin—they approved an increase in the minimum wage with a plan to get to $15 dollars per hour within a few years. Without question, based on the strength of the Bernie Sanders campaign in the West, the entire coastline has been destroyed by progressive politics greatly crippling the American economy. Now with the minimum wage hike they have fully committed to socialism which of course will deplete their once great state of its wealth quickly.
As I’ve said before, I have worked in fast food for a number of years as a second job. I understand the nature of it—and how hard it can be—and at no time did I ever consider that those positions should be paid any kind of “living wage.” Nobody should seek to make a long career out of a fast food job. They are entry-level jobs that should encourage people to improve their skills and value to the capitalist marketplace. For instance—when I worked in fast food, while other people goofed off on their breaks, I read books so that I could become smarter for better things to come. I worked many odd jobs for essentially the first 15 years of my adult life—up until about 35 years of age. Some of those odd jobs were at fast food places—like Wendy’s, McDonald’s, Frisch’s and so on. During that entire period I never wasted one single break on needless exercises. I was always reading books and trying to improve myself—and there isn’t one person from my past who could step forward and say otherwise. I learned a lot of things in these jobs which obviously helped me later on in life. No, I didn’t get paid much, but the wealth I took away from those jobs was invaluable. But always there was a hunger to do better for my family which pushed me to continuously improve.
Without that motivation to step away from fast food, a lot of talent in America is sure to be wasted. Getting paid so much money for the entry-level workforce weakens all the market mechanisms which make capitalism so successful, which of course is the point of progressives who have been advocating the $15 dollar an hour minimum wage. Of course if the minimum wage is set at $15 then all the jobs upstream from fast food will have to increase which is how the socialists have always planned to attack the American economy—by striking at the profit of corporations for the good of the “people” as if they had equal ownership of the means of labor.
The unintended consequence is that companies like McDonald’s will either downsize and further automate their operations lessening their reliance on labor, or they will relocate to some other area of the country that does not have such hefty financial burdens toward their profit margins. Every video game player should understand this concept. Without some measure of profit—whether its points gained, or trophies won in competition with others—there is little incentive to play a game or open a business—if there is no profit. Human beings are driven by profit. As an example—I am a big fan of the Assassin’s Creed video games. There are lots of ways to “profit” in those games—as you succeed you get to open up new areas to explore, you get achievement trophies to share online with the friends in your network, and of course you earn upgrades to your playable character. Every Silicone Valley geek understands how this works—yet they have a hard time applying these lessons to real life—such as in politics. The same young people who will play an online game for 24 straight hours trying to grind it out to earn bonuses—will stand on a street corner protesting McDonald’s for a minimum wage hike without understanding that they are weakening the game of life for which we all live by. In their minds the two worlds are separated by fantasy and reality—but in the human mind—they are one in the same.
No video gamer wants their achievements and hard work penalized so some newbie can just come into a game like Assassin’s Creed and instantly be as good as everyone else. They are expected to work hard to earn the right and respect of everyone else. Well, the same holds true in a capitalist society. No top executive wants to see some snot nosed kid step directly into a corner glass office in a high-rise firm who hasn’t fought and earned the right to be there. And no straight out of college kid should earn $6 figure salaries unless they’ve done the work to be the top of their field of endeavor. By giving fast food workers an instantly high minimum wage—they are penalizing all those in life who play the game of capitalism hard and create all the jobs for which socialists are so eager to give away for free.
The net result will be fewer jobs in California, higher prices because of the lack of competition, and a general gradual lessening of their global economic prowess. The benefits that so many Californians take for granted today, such as having a McDonald’s down the road for a quick coffee and a breakfast will evaporate the higher that the minimum wage increases rise. McDonald’s will automate and implement those new devices into their stores to protect their margins—which is the lifeblood of their company—it’s not to serve society—it’s to make money—to earn points in the capitalist system. Then what California will end up doing along with socialist Seattle is force McDonald’s to reduce their staffing levels all across the country minimizing job opportunities—not increasing them. For the guy like me who just wanted to earn a little extra money and experience—those jobs may not be available if McDonald’s has to drop their minimum staffing levels from 6 or 7 employees to 3 or 4 to maintain their current margins. Once they develop a formula in California for dealing with the increased costs—they’ll implement that strategy to every store they have around the world.
So it is very sad to see that California took the plunge further into socialism. But I did tell everyone a long time ago that all this was coming—and we know what it looks like—and what impact it has—yet they did it anyway. It further prevents our national GDP from ever having a chance to overtake our massive debt with increased productivity. It certainly puts us all further in the hole—which was always the strategy. How does that make you feel America? It should make you VERY angry.
I say that knowing such viewpoints are considered outdated these days. Believe me, my regard for the household chores that are burdened by a man gives them far more personal weight to carry than women should have to endure—it’s not like men should sit around being couch potatoes being served by the women like maids. I expect men to be gentlemen, to help hold the door open for women wherever they are, to treat them with the utmost respect like the vessels of life that they are—and to put their lives and importance before any man’s personal comfort. Progressives would call that view “old fashioned.” I would say that they are idiots to criticize that formula which evolved out of biological and psychological necessity.
In that context, and I’m not going to embarrass him with calling him out, because he’s certainly not alone in this thinking, but one of the most national critics that I know of Donald Trump who is on the radio broadcasting support for Ted Cruz is a guy who has a wife with a far more prestigious job than he has, makes a lot more money, and she relies on him to share many of the household chores so they are done when she gets home from work. I know this because he’s a friend of mine. Just like Ted Cruz—that friend is failing in his conservatism because he has adopted in his life a progressive metrosexual lifestyle that is not becoming of tradition. He has no right to point to Donald Trump—who does have similar views about conservatism and family life as I do—and says that he as a candidate is not a conservative. In his family life, Donald Trump is far more conservative than Ted Cruz—if we are basing conservatism on traditional values—not progressive manipulation of family lifestyles.
I do not fault people who make these types of arrangements within their marriages—it’s their choice. But I do judge them as lacking conservatism. There was a lot about the old stereotypes about breadwinners and domestic tasks for women that helped tag team successful family growth that has been thrown out due to progressive marketing within our country, which should be revisited regarding conservative philosophy. I’ve been married for over a quarter century and honestly I don’t think marriages can last without a proper division of labor specified toward the roles of the sexes. Women are built through estrogen to project a certain level of sign stimuli to be appealing to the opposite sex, and domestic tasks achieved are part of that femininity. Men are built through testosterone to endure physical challenges that don’t always require great intellect, but will make them sweat and project masculinity—which females are biologically inclined to find appealing. It is quite natural for a woman to watch a man chopping wood in the yard from the kitchen window then desire to take him a cool refreshment to get a whiff of his sweaty masculinity. Men find such odors disgusting, but women enjoy them for reasons of mating customs. When we change those rhythms with the family unit we change the nature of philosophy for which human society is built. That is not a good thing when what did work produced many of the positive gains our culture has enjoyed for the last several thousand years.
Of course there is a reason that progressives advocate homosexual rights, just as they have attached themselves to the feminist movement. They have always been after the destruction of the family unit—by feminizing men and encouraging masculine women so that the barriers to primal mating customs could be destroyed and conservative traditions eradicated. The strategic necessity in this endeavor has of course been to turn family control over to the state and pave the way for National Socialism. Given the popularity of the presidential candidate Bernie Sanders—we can see how effective that marketing has been.
When men try to tell me that my ideas about families and the relationship between men and women is outdated—I feel sorry for them, because they are in denial. They will point at their successful dual income lives and declare themselves victors of economic achievement. But they often lack the types of deep love and understanding that our grandparents knew when men were men, women were women, and everyone knew what their family and social roles were—before progressive tampering with biological natures. A lot of the mess we see today can be directly attributed to this condition. Women have been told that they have to be everything to everyone—but most of all, that they must make personal sacrifices for the good of all women and their social obligations as a village. That is why so many women are willing to vote for Hillary Clinton in spite of her terrible record and obvious dishonesty. This is also why Donald Trump’s numbers are so low among women—because instinctively they come to each other’s collective aid when they sense another is in trouble—like the banter between Trump and Cruz over who was more attractive, Heidi Cruz or Melania Trump. When that didn’t work out so well for Cruz, he proclaimed that Trump didn’t like “strong” women—which he insinuated means a career driven maniac who has put her career before her family for the benefit of what she believes is important. The insinuation also was that Melania Trump was a bimbo of some sort because she’s pretty and has decided to be a happy housewife—and to withdraw from collective feminism. Melania in her own right had a successful modeling career and she had done well with a jewelry line as an entrepreneur. But when given an option to have a life for “herself” or to stay home with her son Barron and raise him properly, she picked service to her family over service to collective society—and that is looked down upon by most women who have been trained to think that these feminist arguments about “self reliance” from a “man” was actually good for them. And to the men who have married such women and taken a “progressive” role in their own families—they often find themelves miserable or divorced before it’s all said and done.
I often love talking to old people, because to the 70-year-old couple who have survived a 50 year marriage and has 20 grandchildren and 5 or 6 great-grandchildren, they have lost their estrogen and their testosterone and are as equal within the sexes that human beings can truly be. But they still play out their roles within the family for the psychological maintenance of their children and grandchildren. The man might work out in a tool shed carving wood while the woman works at being experts in the kitchen. Of course the man could learn to cook and could rival any woman, and the woman could learn to carve wood and mow the grass. But successful marriages learn what works and how they can use their sexual roles to bond their families to an idea of conservatism for which the family can last through the ages.
So I find it preposterous that Ted Cruz feels inclined to lecture Donald Trump on the family roles of his wife—because Trump does not have“enlightened” outlook feminism. Cruz obviously does, and so do many men that I know who have confused themselves by thinking that mixing up the sexual roles of family business is somehow considered “conservative.” I can think of about ten men right now who are either national figures speaking out against Trump in favor of Cruz or they are just local business associates who share with their wives the tasks of cooking, cleaning and bread winning—and they are all either divorced at some point in their lives, or they are miserable and secretly hate their wives. The wives secretly know this so to keep the marriage together for their children they occasionally let their men go to Vegas to blow off some steam and make fools of themselves. The women giggle at Pure Romance parties and watch chick flicks together and these idiots think that behavior is rooted in conservatism and will produce a successful family existence. They are mistaken.
Trump is the first presidential candidate in my lifetime that has not backed down from this issue. If he thinks someone looks like a radicalized feminist—he chews into them the same way as he would a man—and that is equal treatment. If women want to play with the boys, that’s the way it goes. But in his family life, he is very traditional—at least by today’s standards. I would argue that Trump is much, much more conservative than Glenn Beck, Ted Cruz and all the writers at the Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal, and at Fox News. The men who have given in to this progressive feminist push for equality without the consequences of being dominated by an A Type male—have to justify their failure somehow. These metrosexual conservatives play the same games feminists do, they say that Trump is not a conservative in the way that women have been told that they need to have an “independent” life by service to collectivism. And that just isn’t how the situation is in actuality. Ted Cruz and his supporters have become feminized and tricked into thinking they are still conservatives. But they are not. Sometimes being “enlightened” isn’t a great. Tell that to the bug that reached for the light only to be incinerated by a bug zapper. The human race is doing the same thing to itself—and it’s not very becoming. Putting up with people who have consciously made all the wrong decisions in their life is one thing—but being lectured by them is something else. And I really don’t want to hear Ted Cruz with his little Kermit the Frog voice lecture me about “strong women” when he obviously has issues in his marriage. Save it for counseling—but don’t pretend that the insane behavior is a pinnacle of conservatism. All it really is, is embarrassing.
You might have noticed dear reader that I have some different pictures on my websites. It has been a long time since I’ve updated any profile pictures and it was appropriate to reflect my new stage in life. So my daughter at Brooke Townsend Photography.com set up a time to do a photo shoot with me and the result was some of these pictures that you are now seeing. I have a complete life, I do a lot of things—I’ve been all over the world and done a lot of important tasks that people think are important. I’ve raised children that I’m very proud of and I’ve been married to the same woman for over a quarter century. By all accounts I am a very successful person bulging with skills and accomplishments that many would be envious of. I don’t say all that to brag, but I work hard every day to be the best that I can be, and I have certainly done that. So my daughter and I were talking about what kind of pictures to take of me—how to sum up my world views and essence into a simple photograph. It’s not just my opinion, but those of her clients, my daughter has emerged on the world stage as a highly sought out photographer and her rates reflect the quality and uniqueness of her work, so I trust her professional recommendations. She and I set out on an early spring morning recently to capture my essence that best represented this stage of my life and the result is what follows.
Of course I can pretty much buy whatever I want these days so it should say a lot that the possession I most love is my fast draw holster rig for my .45 Vaquero. It is specially made and is my single most cherished item that I currently have. With that said we focused on it for these photographs because as I said some time ago, I consider my new career to be that of a gunfighter. Standing up for the Second Amendment, taking constitutional positions that are regarded legally as Anti-Federalist instead of Federalist—and my love of history really prevents me from any other type of career. I like to stand up against bullies, at every level of the social spectrum—in manners of career, politics, and private life—that life as a gunfighter is really my only choice.
Being a gunfighter to me isn’t what it was during the period of the Old West. It’s not about killing other people—it’s more of a sport, like being a basketball player, or a football star. Being a gunfighter is what I enjoy most in this case within the sport of Cowboy Fast Draw which I practice at every day in some fashion or another. A lot of men my age get heavy into golf—and I can see the appeal. It can be magical to go to Dick’s sporting goods and pick out top-of-the-line golf clubs and spend many afternoons playing rounds of golf with the material acquisitions acquired through financial success. But that is too stereotypical for me to really enjoy because so many people do it. I need something that represents my unique life, and a gunfighter embodies my decisions much better—to the level I am quite excited about it.
My daughter did a wonderful job of capturing the light in a way that embodied how I feel about this stage. If I look proud wearing the gun and holster rig from Mernickle it’s because I am. For one reason or another I spent ten years planning on how I could incorporate these things in my life. Most of the reason was that I worked too much so I didn’t have time for a hobby, or career as a gunfighter—because it takes a lot of work to do it right. It’s the same situation with my .500 Magnum from Smith & Wesson. I thought about those guns for a very long time and finally picked them up when I was able to make a clear decision to commit some time to caring for them as a sport. I’m not the kind of person who just buys things to have them, then puts them on display in my home for other to look at. I actually have to make them a part of my life. The Mernickle holster rig is something that I plan to make a part of my daily life, so it is now a constant companion to me. I thought about it so long that of course finally wearing it made me proud.
I think it’s a shame that firearms in general have such a negative stigma applied to them. To me guns are all about great precision machining, and science—the combustible elements of lead projectiles mixed with gunpowder in closed dimensional quarters guided by human skill toward an intended target are the keys to their utilization. To get an idea of what I’m talking about click the picture on the sidebar next to this article, the one where the gun is pointed toward the camera. That is a reaction timer test that records your ability to identify a target and react to it within thousands of a second. A good time is anything in the .100 range, from the time you see the light to when you click the mouse button. Mastering those types of skills don’t just help you in shooting sports, but in all aspects of life—because it forces your brain to think faster and to work more efficiently. The difference between a time in the .300s and .100s is barely perceptible to human measurement—but by practicing, you can begin to feel it when you get a good time and when you don’t. For instance, it might be remembered that I survived a very serious motorcycle crash last year. It was only because of lightning reflexes that I managed to walk away with all my body parts and only a few cracked bones. My $12,000 motorcycle was totaled, but I still made it to a very important business meeting an hour later because of how I develop myself though my hobbies—with an emphasis on speed and accuracy through working with bull whips for so many years.
Dedicating time toward the skills it takes to be a gunfighter has a spillover effect into all aspects of life, so I see it as a tremendous benefit. While it might be out-of-step with mainstream thought, my gun rig with my Vaquero is my most prized worldly possession and my daughter did a good job of capturing it in our photo shoot. I wear it all the time at home and whenever I’m in my garage, it has become mandated to always be at my side while on my property. Whether I’m in my shop reloading ammunition, or target shooting for hours on end, my new Mernickle holster rig has become emblematic with my personality, so we are making it an important part of my life going forward—which is reflected in the pictures that will be taken of me in the future. Guns have always been a part of my life, but they’ve always been in the background. Now they will be very much more a part of the foreground. As society has become more progressive, those of us who love traditional American concepts should stand up proudly on its behalf. And that is what I intend to do with each year that emerges hereafter.
They are lucky in a lot of ways that in America, we have the 1st Amendment. Because the outrage is protecting them from those of us who are fully awake. We are shooting words in an open marketplace instead of bullets. It is obvious that many on the political left and establishment right don’t like the rebellion that is currently occurring, because not enough people are complying to sustain their formulaic plans. But, too bad. I will never submit to their way of thinking. It’s just not going to happen. If given opportunities to compete in the marketplace of ideas, I’m happy to use that method to fight them with debate. But if that goes away, I’m happy to do it in other ways—and I can assure everyone, that compliance with the current conditions is not an option. To understand what I’m talking about, do yourself a favor, listen and watch this Alex Jones broadcast from Friday March, 25th. While you are working in the garage on this nice spring day, or around the house, listen to this very good report—its three hours long. I don’t agree with all of it, but it is quite good at detailing the fight we are all facing. Don’t be asleep, it’s time to get up and go to work. Join me on the battlefield.
And do a friend a favor and send this to them to help them wake up as well. If you want the evidence of what Jones is saying, I have written millions and millions of words providing the proof. Just look up any topic in the search bar on the left and you’ll find the evidence to substantiate what you are hearing. If you doubt any of this remember that last night, the same day as this Alex Jones broadcast, Bernie Sanders–a socialist–filled up a 15,000 seat baseball stadium in Seattle. The communists are rising, and the only defense there is against them–are us.
Let me say this, I don’t like Heidi Cruz. I felt that way before the Cruz Super PAC went after Melania Trump recently. From what I’ve seen about Heidi she reminds me of all the school levy supporters that I have called latté sipping prostitutes in the past. I tend not to trust people who are too religious because to my experience there are skeletons in their closet that they use religion to conceal. I also don’t trust people who hide behind children. However, when Roger Stone was talking about the percolating sex scandal on the Alex Jones Show a few weeks ago concerning Ted Cruz, I wasn’t all that surprised.
When a man or woman has power, members of the opposite sex do try to seduce them as a lottery ticket toward advantage. When you are a senator and working with a lot of young people—and you are middle-aged on top of the normal temptations, it is not hard to imagine how something scandalous might happen to Ted Cruz. But when the National Enquirer came out with a major five woman scandal in their latest issue they either put themselves in a serious libel situation, or there is fire behind the smoke. Given where things are in the presidential race and the premise of the Cruz candidacy—the pure-hearted Christian conservative that is Glenn Beck’s second coming—this revelation provides insight that needs to be explored further.
I wasn’t going to say anything, but what the Cruz people did—in a roundabout way with the Super PAC in Utah made me mad. It was a holier than thou presumption that either means Cruz is pure as snow—which part of me has hoped that he was—or he was using religion in the same fashion as so many ministers have–to hide their sexual antics. And all this would point to Heidi Cruz—there is something not quite right about her. I don’t want her as a first lady. Ted Cruz has seemed too good to be true, which usually means he isn’t. So it will be interesting to see how this story plays out. I don’t put a lot of trust in the National Enquirer, but apparently this story has been on ice for several months by multiple sources and it was only the Enquirer who took the first step to break it. Given that the information was first discussed by Roger Stone over a week ahead of this announcement and that one of the women is Katrina Pierson—who is a Trump spokesman, it looks clear that Donald was willing to be a gentleman about the issue until the line was crossed with Melania. And I don’t blame him a bit.
I had been watching the Netflix show House of Cards and was enjoying it, except for the sex. There was just too much sex in it for me. I finally turned it off when Frank Underwood played by Kevin Spacey and his wife had three-way sex with their treasured Secret Service agent. It wasn’t just two guys on a girl, it was guy on guy sex and that is something I won’t support. However, the sex in the show is there for a reason. People want to see it, it reflects their desires, and is very much indicative of Washington D.C. culture. There is a part of me that hopes that this Ted Cruz sex scandal is all smoke, and if it is—I hope he sues the Enquirer into oblivion. But there is something about Heidi Cruz which tells me that it isn’t—and that Trump was alluding to that when he defended his own wife against the Super PAC ads about Melania.
Further angering me was the finger waving Ted Cruz calling Trump a sniveling coward for attacking Heidi. There are obvious problems with the Cruz marriage and that does not give Ted the authority to preach to Trump or anybody else what’s right. His campaign continues to have these kinds of scandals, where third-party participants do hit pieces on his behalf that have been downright dirty. At least with Trump, he’s out in the open about the things he does. Ted hides and now it looks like we all know why. If he can’t keep things cleaner than this during a campaign just think what he and his wife would be like in the White House. Even after Cruz’s little public refute of Donald Trump—the presidential front-runner was extremely quite on Twitter not posting anything for over 20 hours as this story developed. That tells me everything I want to know because that hasn’t happened over the entire six month history of Trump’s run. Why tick off all of the Cruz supporters when Ted let them down himself? The reason is that this is more than smoke.
After hour 20, this is what Donald Trump said about this issue, written 34 minutes prior to this writing:
I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.
Likewise, I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence. Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz.
I look forward to spending the week in Wisconsin, winning the Republican nomination and ultimately the Presidency in order to Make America Great Again.
With all the recent excitement there hasn’t been much time to congratulate Warren Davidson for winning the seat John Boehner left behind in Ohio’s 8th District. Butler County Republicans did not support Davidson, so thankfully the district was big enough to not be swayed by the party bosses as the Troy native picked up enough votes north of Preble County to push him over the top in a race with double-digit challengers. I was a supporter of Davidson and he had the endorsement of Ann Becker of the Cincinnati Tea Party so he was our best hope for a congressional representative who would go to Washington D.C. and represent Tea Party type values, fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government.
Anywhere that Bill Ayers is protesting you want to make sure that you are on the opposite side of him. Ayers, the terrorist friend of Barack Obama was spotted at the Trump rally in Chicago helping to instigate terror throughout the ranks of middle-America with a show of leftist unity that has been nurtured in our education system against American terrorism. George Soros has been funneling money to insurgents against Trump for reasons that should be obvious. Trump represents a complete destruction of the political system that most politicians have grown used to supporting. If Trump can manage to stay afloat, his presence along will dominate Washington politics in ways that I have only dreamed of, and Warren Davidson will have the benefit of being a good person not yet corrupted thriving in the wake of that turmoil. Now that the reality of a Trump candidacy is setting in, the bandits are clinging to desperation. Soros also tossed money at John Kasich to keep his campaign alive to soak up delegates in an attempt to block Trump from the nomination. His reason is obvious to all those who know the Soros history. As an open border advocate, Trump will put an instant end to that practice and restore national sovereignty, which the Hungarian billionaire has spent the last three decades trying to destroy. All the villains are out against Trump and all at the same time. Most people would have long been destroyed—so the fact that Trump is still unfettered by all the attacks from both within and outside the Republican Party is quite something to behold.
John Boehner did put out a nice message to Davidson congratulating him on the victory of being the next to hold the seat of the former Speaker of the House. Years ago I received an exclusive invite to meet with Boehner at a special event in Butler County—and the people who extended the invitation were to me very powerful people in their own right. I couldn’t figure out why they treated Boehner as a celebrity the way they did. My in-laws knew John Boehner when he was a bright-eyed boy about a decade younger than Warren Davidson is now—and they liked him a lot. John Boehner was a hard-working nice boy who had small town charm and common sense. We all thought that he was going to be something special when he became Speaker of the House—the third most powerful position in the world regarding government. But obviously all the years on the Hill changed Boehner and he wasn’t able to do as we hoped. So I skipped the event much to the dismay of the invitees—I really didn’t feel like shaking his hand and breaking bread with him. Just the other day Boehner proposed that at a brokered convention in Cleveland during the hot months of July that the party nominate Paul Ryan to the presidency ignoring Trump and Cruz after all the work and pledges to the party that had been made. It was just a little shocking that Boehner tossed his opinion in the ring because it showed his real intentions. Boehner had retired from Congress to do essentially one thing—and that was to become a lobbyist on K-Street a year after. Trump and his methods of management threaten to make that world of lobbying a much less stable enterprise and for people like Boehner—who are counting on that revenue stream based on those who have come before him—people like Trent Lott—Trump is terrible news for them—because a lot of money gets wasted on K-Street that nobody knows anything about. I never considered Boehner a celebrity or even somebody I’d want to breathe the same air near. To me he was just another failed politician.
I had given Boehner two chances not to be a complete loser and he failed at both. First was a time when I went to one of his town hall events to express the concerns I had for the 8th district. This was back in 2010. I had prepared a Power Point exhibiting how K-Street needed to be reformed, our involvement in the United Nations scaled back, and how taxes needed to be lowered. Boehner wasn’t there of course—he was too big of a celebrity by then to deal with constituents directly—so he sent underlings to handle things on his behalf. I received a nice form letter from him a few weeks later thanking me for participating in the democratic process. It looked like it was signed by him, but I wasn’t impressed—so I threw it away with the rest of our garbage that day. A few years later after Obama had worked appointees during congressional recess acting in an illegal fashion I stopped by Boehner’s office with a very carefully worded letter pressing the Speaker to use his power to stop Obama from pushing around the Republican Party. REVIEW THAT LETTER HERE. On that I heard nothing from Boehner’s office and that was it for me. I was ready to see the guy knocked off his perch and replaced with someone who really wanted to do the job of representing our district.
Area Republicans were much divided about Boehner. The Tea Party types looked for ways to challenge him in a general election as party bosses schemed to keep Republicans aligned under the Speaker. As Judy Shelton and many others yelled to those who could hear them—that the Tea Party would be destroyed within a year of 2014 they missed that across the county there were more eager young limited government types emerging in the House and Senate that were beginning to challenge Boehner’s leadership driving him to resign in October of 2015. Republicans in the House were deeply divided, there were many who were trying to represent the Republic in the proper way while many old timers like Boehner were just trying to bide their time until they could become a lobbyist and make a lot of money moving bills around through Capitol Hill. Unlike Judy Shelton’s Butler County dreams of holding the party together under the old system challenges continued to dominate the political scene and the Tea Party influence expanded. The old guard had to yield and it did culminating with the resignation of John Boehner. He figured that he could get out while the getting was good and he could make some serious money as a lobbyists for a decade or two—before reform really kicked in. But Trump is threatening that entire system in a much shorter timeframe. Boehner at this rate may not even get to achieve his dream. So establishment Republicans are more than a little concerned—their gravy train appears to be leaving the station with each new Trump rally and it sincerely scares them.
Meanwhile Warren Davidson will have Boehner’s seat. He’s a smart young considerate man and you can tell when you shake his hand that he’s politically pure—meaning his idealism is conducive to a constitutional republic. He has not yet accepted the vile evil that Bill Ayers is protesting in favor of at Trump rallies or the open border policies of George Soros. He has not yet taken money the way that Kasich did from the Hungarian financial terrorist so he doesn’t yet know the sting of standing up against those forces. Everything in the 8th District of Ohio makes pretty much sense until you get into that Washington D.C. culture and they bend back your arms to make you play ball. Hopefully, Davidson can hold up long enough to get a Tea Party president in the White House which looks to happen one way or another. Trump is my kind of Tea Party candidate, Cruz is Ann’s—but both are hardly the type of people who will stand for politics as usual. That’s why they are winning and the establishment guys are losing—badly. In many ways Warren Davidson’s election was just in a nick of time. I have high hopes for him. But he will have to use all that West Point strategy and discipline to hold up over the next few years as the establishment transitions over into the kind of government that a new president will bring—with clear Tea Party values. The writing is on the wall even if establishment politicians don’t want to see it. Things are changing rapidly—and when it does—we’ll have a great guy holding a valuable seat in Washington D.C. Thank goodness!
If you ever wanted a way to explain to your kids why they should never do drugs, just point them in the direction of the Kasich presidential campaign. It always comes up if you dig deep enough; illegal drugs are a terrible aspect of modern culture—especially in Ohio. If there is one reason to despise illegal immigration, it is because of the horrendous effect that narcotics passing into our country hidden within that act entails—drugs turn good people into bad every time—without fail. Now based on his behavior it would appear that John Kasich has become a serious drug addict. What he is saying and doing makes no sense—he is delusional. The day after the Super Tuesday presidential results where Donald Trump won five American territories and lost only one to John Kasich—Kasich complete with a confetti style victory party had his team put together this video.
Uuuuuuh, we are halfway through the election of more than fifty American territories who produce electoral votes and Governor Kasich of Ohio has only won one state with a measly 66 delegates—and that was Ohio on March 15th. For him and really everyone else the election is already over except by defying the will of the American voter who has supported the Republican Party. There is no other way for this election to end for Kasich other than a concession speech. Yet, Kasich and his people sent me this email looking for money just two days from a miserable showing on Super Tuesday where he barely even stacked up any votes in most of the states—except for Ohio. Nobody in their right mind—who has any money to speak of—would dump money into Kasich—these are supposed to be smart people. But this email clearly shows the rationality of a crack addict looking for just one more hit before plunging themselves into bankruptcy.
Rich, want to defeat Hillary Clinton and win the White House? Only John Kasich can do it.
Gov. John Kasich is the ONLY Republican polls show can defeat her in three critical swing states: Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire.
Following our big Ohio win, we’re now focused on collecting delegates in Utah (will caucus on Tuesday) and the other major upcoming states like Wisconsin, New York, Pennsylvania and many others.
Rich – not only will we continue to gain momentum before the convention but we’ll unify our party and defeat Hillary Clinton this fall.
We have an 8-point lead over Hillary nationally and would defeat her in Ohio by 21 points!
Our positive message is working and it’s gaining more attention every day.
Trump and Cruz are terrified to face Gov. John Kasich in the GOP convention. Here’s why: Politico released a survey where 45% of respondents said that John Kasich is the best Republican candidate to go on and defeat Hillary Clinton this fall. Kasich finishes 12-points ahead of Cruz and a whopping 23-points ahead of Trump! While the other candidates have run campaigns that divide us, Gov. Kasich is the lone candidate who’s run a positive campaign focused on working together to solve our greatest challenges with real, achievable solutions. Utah will caucus on Tuesday and Wisconsin voters will head to the polls on April 5th. We need your ongoing support to ensure that we can keep growing on our momentum from the big win in Ohio. We WILL stop Trump from getting the nomination and we WILL win at the convention – and then we’ll go on to defeat Hillary this fall and begin the hard work of fixing America, together.
That guy should be fired if he is the chief strategist for Kasich—and Kasich needs to enter re-hab immediately for signing off on it. To even talk about going to a convention with the most momentum at this point is insanely stupid. I know area Republicans are having a hard time with the Donald Trump eventual nomination because it will completely change the way they do business inside the Beltway–Lobby money for politicians is like heroin or cocaine is to a drug addict—for the sake of the American Republic—the practice has to end. Politicians have not done the job correctly for two centuries, and American voters are pulling the plug on them—especially people like John Kasich. How any Republican within the party leadership could look at the loser and conclude that he should be taking a victory lap after winning Ohio is just delusional—and it’s no wonder that so many people support Donald Trump.
We all speculate on how bad the “political class” really is, and have great fun making light of their efforts. But up until recently we didn’t have any alternative. Trump gives us an alternative. Cruz is too rigid for the job, and he is clinging on for dear life, legitimately. He doesn’t do well in most of the states that are coming up–especially California and New York and now Lindsey Graham is actually joining sides with the hated senator for the sheer preservation of their Beltway addictions. But Kasich hasn’t really been on the radar but in a few very progressive states who only vote for him because he’s like voting for a Democrat. Everywhere else, he has bombed badly.
That can only lead us to believe that he has lost his sanity. And he, along with many establishment Republicans have surrendered their logic to the gullibility of addiction. They share with the most despicable of our national citizens a love for illusion conjured up by drug use. Addiction to lobbyist entitlements to the brain of the consumer is no different essentially than a line of cocaine—because the result is the same—avoidance of reality, artificial stimulation of the present circumstances, and undeniable escape from the conditions of one’s environment. John Kasich and his team have shown that they are no different than the scum bag drug addict who would sell their children into the hands of villains just to feel the rush of their drug of choice one last time. My answer to them is no different than if a homeless person missing all their teeth and wearing tattered clothing draped from their arms asked me for a few dollars in downtown Cincinnati. You know by giving them money that they are only going to turn around and buy a bottle of alcohol or a hit of crack—that’s usually why they are in the situation that they are—because they made bad decisions based on a reality they couldn’t come to terms with. And that is certainly the situation with John Kasich. He has lost his mind in addition to losing the election during the presidential primary. Now it forces us to do the hard thing—and that is to starve him out for his own good. He has embarrassed us enough in Ohio. Now it’s time to turn off the money—I certainly won’t be giving him any.
