Not because I like them and want to help them.  I don’t; I want to see them destroyed and eradicated from existence.  But they are doing that to themselves, so there is no harm in me pointing out the problem.  Because of the way they are as a party, the Democrats, and the growing minority of RINOs, even knowing how to solve the problem won’t help them do it because it essentially comes down to developed skill and the ability to use it as opposed to what they have built their entire existence around.  But what I am about to say is worth many millions of dollars based on the market value of the information.  It makes me pretty sick to interact with this side of political business, as much as I do, because the information is worth so much.  Yet it has been painful to listen to the post-election analysis by virtually everyone who has been grotesquely wrong in their analysis of what went wrong with the Harris campaign and what they could have done better to win.  The answer to their question came obviously in the last week of the election cycle when Joe Rogan was trying to make a deal with the Harris campaign, who stumbled all over themselves trying to dictate the terms of engagement to Rogan as if something as valuable as 3 hours on his show were more beneficial to him than her.  The Harris campaign completely flubbed up the deal because the strategy was a game of keep away, not full disclosure.  In today’s media market, people want decentralized information that is as quick as possible from the most convenient source.  These are not the days, nor will we have them ever again, of Bill O’Reilly or Walter Cronkite telling people what they should think about something. Instead, this was the election year where alternative media was the kingmaker, and President Trump participated in it to far better use than Kamala Harris, which is why she performed so poorly. 

Leading up to this election cycle, and it was starting to show with them in 2020 as 2016 exploited this trend for the first time, really was the belief that public opinion could be purchased with ad buys that could tell people what to think about something.  In 2024, Kamala Harris and others spent over a billion dollars on image management, creating Hollywood-style commercials and celebrity endorsements that told the public that the insiders thought this way and that, and you could be one of them if only you voted for Kamala Harris.  The Democrat belief that image could be purchased, not earned, was their foundation fault in their catastrophic 2024 numbers.  I am not speaking from emotion because I hate people like Kamala Harris and her Democrats with every cell in my body and want to see them all personally destroyed.  But if I were at their strategy table, I would tell them that their crucial mistake was their belief that they could purchase public opinion for Kamala Harris when the trend of the 2020s was authenticity from decentralized media outlets that could allow people to get to know the people they were voting for.  Like Biden before Harris, the Democrats believed, and so did many Republicans, that the merit of actually being a good person was not crucial in elections because people were so gullible and unrespected for their opinions and intelligence that a typical public relations firm could create impressions that could win elections from a public too stupid to know better. 

Case in point, two Fridays before the election on November 5^th, 2024, and remember what I said in the years leading up to this election that the two most significant contributors to future elections were the creation of Truth Social, then Elon Musk buying Twitter and turning it into “X” were the most essential things, Trump did a brilliant 3 hours of interview on the Joe Rogan Experience.  Rogan offered Harris equal time, but the campaign managers could not do it because they had a candidate who was a media creation caricature.  They couldn’t do live interviews because she couldn’t think for herself.  Ultimately, this was the same problem that Joe Biden had, which is precisely why all Democrats are having problems.  It’s also why, until Trump came along, Republicans had the same authenticity problem.  In a culture where the media is not controlled by corporate centralized banking that ultimately controls the message, free-market delivery of ideas will strengthen the republic’s foundation as it should.  Over 3000 years of image control maintenance was being changed by Truth Social, Gettr, and Elon Musk’s “X,” which was far more potent than any of the traditional outlets, and only President Trump had figured out how to communicate to a public hungry to know who they were voting for.  Because Harris couldn’t do the Rogan show, J.D. Vance stepped in and did another 3 hours of excellent exposure that played on clips all over social media, and that was pretty much what sealed the deal for the Trump campaign in 2024.  There were many things that Trump and Vance did that were great during this election season; something people will be studying for hundreds of years.  However, the Harris people had a candidate who was not authentic and couldn’t perform well in public based on her unique experiences as a person.  And that’s what voters are looking for in this new media world. 

Then, to seal that off before the election, Elon Musk went on with Joe Rogan and made the essential pitch for the differences in this election and described what people were voting for, which separated Harris from Trump.  There are problems with the actual number of people who voted.  2020 was built on election fraud, a planned event for the last actual election in America that was free.  Communism had other plans, and there was no scenario where 2024 would ever happen as a free election.  Starting with Obama, then carrying on with Biden, and then using Harris to continue the policy, the media markets, as well as most other markets, were wholly captured by global communism, so the Harris people were not prepared for an election where people could get their information from decentralized sources outside of traditional media, newspapers and celebrities.  But in 2024, none of those things were how people received their news.  Social media was the key, and Trump understood that and could deliver his message more effectively because he has such a unique personality.  Ultimately, he built trust with people, not by being a phony but by being truly good and not afraid to let people see it.  Kamala Harris couldn’t do that under any circumstance.  The more people got to know her, the less they liked her because she is a phony personality at her very foundation.  And this will be a problem for Democrats for years.  I don’t think they’ll ever recover. Instead, Republicans will split in two, which will be our political future.  Democrats, as they are America’s Marxists, won’t have a seat at the table because these next four years will destroy the entire communist movement once and for all.  And Democrats won’t be able to adapt.  There you go; I’ll be looking for my 2 million dollar check in the mail because that’s what the information I just provided is worth.  It’s incredible that many people working in that business are so stupid.  But those are the facts, and they won’t be changing back to a world that Democrats can control as they have in the past.  The future will not wait for them, nor will it be accommodating.

Rich Hoffman

Click Here to Protect Yourself with Second Call Defense https://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707