Efficiency is key to the success of any economic endeavor. The reason I’m a conservative is because logically that is where economic efficiency is best found. Let’s face it, the liberal bureaucratic bound approach to all of life’s issues requiring potential monetary endowments also represents the antithesis of efficiency. I defy a single Liberal to step forward and explain the logic behind the socialist economic theories liberalism espouses, let alone provide examples of how those theories can actually create efficiency.Last year I ran for an open school board position in the district where I live. I was a literal unknown challenger in a group that included an incumbent, an existing member of the District Finance Committee, and a former Board President. Needless to say I was a long shot. Even though I didn’t win I still managed a good showing, even beating out the former Board President. The reason I was able to do as well as I did was because of my approach. I didn’t waste time demonizing my opponents or any particular group such as the teachers union. Instead, I focused my message on the concept of creating true efficiency within the district.Efficiency comes in many flavors. The teachers union openly feared me because they also fear the word efficiency. Understandably, the reason is that whenever they hear that word it typically translates either into layoffs, pay cuts, or both. However, had they actually listened to my message, they would have realized that approach wasn’t necessarily the efficiency I was talking about. That type of efficiency is what I call the cheap status quo model. For example, how cheap can I get by when negotiating on copier paper when the real question should be what other options are there to send out information other than in printed form? When it came to our district I was seeking to think beyond just the simple cheaper status quo model. I was seeking to rethink everything we do, not just negotiate a cheaper price on things we may not even need in the first place.When it comes to our schools we must start doing better. We are already screwing over our heirs when it comes to burdening them with the disastrous results of our approach on overspending and debt. I see no reason why they must also suffer at the hands of a failed approach to education as well. The current system we have is an unmitigated disaster. We are relying on a model that was created nearly a century ago. It is a system that is so outdate, over bloated, over controlled, and inefficient that actual learning takes a back seat to far too many other self serving and inefficient agenda’s. Furthermore, it fails to meet the skill set required for the modern workforce.In 1979 President Carter created the Department of Education thus placing oversight over the nation’s educational system under federal control. His idea was that he could fix all of our educational ills and make everything “equal” at the same time. Instead it proved to be a huge mistake. We currently have twice as many people working in our public educational system today as we did in 1970. At the same time our public school enrollment has only gone up by 8.5%. Even after adjusting for inflation we dump exponentially more dollars per student into public education than we did in 1970 yet test scores haven’t budged in all those years. If anything, we’ve gone down in our educational rankings against the rest of the world. In the mean time the bureaucracy that Carter created is so overwhelming that attempting to make any significant structural changes is like trying to turn around a battleship in a fishing pond. If you attempt any movement at all you’ll only find yourself sinking further in the muck.
The first thing we need to do to right this ship is to get rid of the Department of Education and send that function back to the states. Not only will that unload a huge layer of unnecessary bureaucracy, but in all honesty, those that have the best interest of the children are those that can be found closest to the children themselves. That means even the state should surrender the bulk of control back to the local districts. After all, it’s the parents within the district that care the most for the educational welfare of their own children. Yes, I get the whole concept of economic disparity, but what we are talking about here is control. The best method for equalizing the economic disparity and also provide parental control at the same time is through a voucher system whereby parents are granted choices and quality is promoted through competition.The answer we’ve always gotten ever since Carter took over education is that rather than actually addressing the real needs of our kids, we simply need to continually pour an ever increasing amount of money into an ever increasing bureaucracy that does nothing to fix our failing schools. However, there is no model whatsoever that proves such a correlation between money and a quality education actually exists. When kids in 3rd world countries are proving everyday that it’s possible to learn even in grass huts and bombed out buildings than more money isn’t the answer. When it does come to money we need to get personal agenda’s out of education. It makes no logical sense whatsoever for a district to be forced to pay a gym teacher and a chemistry teacher on the same pay scale. There is no logical reason for denying parents choices when it comes to their kid’s educational opportunities simply based on personal income either. For their part parents do need to become more active participants in their child’s education instead of viewing schools as nothing more than glorified daycares. Practically every study out there confirms that the single biggest factor in the quality of our schools is parental participation.
We need to modernize our approach to education in general. That means we need to stop simply teaching to a standardized test. Yes, it’s important that our kids understand things like reading and writing. However, much of what is being taught today isn’t really learning as much as it is memorization in order to pass those standardized test. What we should really be teaching our kids is critical thinking skills. We need to understand and accept that in the modern world things are changing at such an incredible rate that much of what a freshman learns today won’t even be relevant by the time they graduate. Therefore, we need to be teaching them the skills necessary to perpetually adapt to an ever changing environment. We can’t do that by being wed to an antiquated inefficient model.There seems to be universal agreement that what we are currently facing is an educational crisis in much the same manner as we are facing a very real debt crisis. In both cases there are sound answers that can be found simply by looking to both logic and efficiency to find the answers. We are already threatening to enslave the next generation to the will of our debt holders. There’s no sane reason that we should also be taking tomorrow’s potential leaders and turning them into the menial labor force of a foreign master as well.Mark Etterling
Tag: education funding
Views from the Heartland: The voice of common sense by Mark Etterling
Mark Etterling is in the leadership at the Liberty Twp Tea Party and has been a school board candidate in the past for Lakota, and I hope he is a future candidate because he’s a good guy who is a whole lot nicer politically than I am, and is willing to work with people on the other side. It takes all kinds to make the world go around and Mark is certainly one of the first-class people functioning in the world. As a local author he contributes frequent articles about the state of America that are quite good and balanced. He has been a guest pundit on CNN and other media expressing Tea Party views articulately and I enjoy his work. Because of that I am going to begin featuring some of his work here at the OW to expose his efforts to a larger audience. So enjoy!
The looming economic debate that’s taking over the headlines has to do with Republicans seeking spending cuts while at the same time Obama wants to raise taxes on the wealthy. The ever popular battle cry of the Left is that we should be demanding the wealthy pay their “fair share”. In reality the first thing that we should be doing is forcing the Left to officially declare once and for all exactly what they believe constitutes a fair share. It is an act which they will never do knowing that it would destroy the very demon their rhetoric relies upon. However, I have an even bigger question for Obama and his cohorts on the Left. Why do they keep insisting on aiding wealthy people while crushing the hopes and dreams of the poor? Yes, you read that correctly.
Billionaire Warren Buffett recently stated that he wouldn’t mind paying more in taxes and everyone on the Left immediately saw Mr. Buffett as some sort of a hero based on his statement. Personally, I see him as a villain. First of all, if Warren truly believed what he was saying he wouldn’t still owe over $1 Billion in back taxes based on existing tax rates. Plus, there is nothing to have ever prevented him from overpaying his taxes in the first place if he was in fact a true believer in what he espoused. But I digress. The real reason for Buffett’s statement and Obama’s actions is far more self indulgent. The Left itself is merely playing the role of the mindless minions to this sinister plot through their shear ignorance.
There is an economic concept that Buffett and others like him understand that the Left simply doesn’t get. The Left is so caught up in the falsity of their own rhetoric that they never bother to think things through far enough to understand reality. The truth is that Warren already has far more wealth than he could ever spend in a lifetime and he has also acquired all the material toys he could ever dream of from that wealth. What he seeks is power. What wealthy people like him understand is that the power derived from wealth doesn’t come from how much someone has. It comes from the difference between how much they have versus everyone else. For example, anyone can become a millionaire in Zimbabwe. However, a million in Zimbabwe currency might only buy you a loaf of bread, so big deal. Again, it’s not the numbers that matter. It’s the difference in the numbers that counts. What Buffett also understands is that we don’t tax based on wealth in this country. We tax based on the acquisition of wealth. In other words we tax income. The easiest way for wealthy people like Buffett to maintain the power of their wealth isn’t by adding yet another $ Billion to their pile. It’s by preventing everyone else from being able to “catch up”. The best method to accomplish this is through punitive tax rates.
Here’s a simple explanation. Even if Warren Buffett shows a net worth of $50 Billion and you show a net worth of only $50K, on January 1st of each year, as far as the IRS is concerned, you and Buffett are considered equal with neither having yet earned any income for the new year. At this point the fortune he has already amassed is irrelevant as far as future taxes are concerned. Again, we don’t tax wealth. We tax the acquisition of wealth. So basically, if Warren decided to bury his $Billions in the dirt and didn’t bother to earn anything for next year he would still be a Billionaire, yet his tax bill at the end of that year would be $0. Therefore, if you and Warren both happen to earn the same amount for this year you would both pay the same in taxes regardless of whatever that tax rate might happen to be. To Warren that extra cash is irrelevant since his bank account already has more digits than he knows what to do with. However, to you that extra cash could mean the difference between moving up a bit more on the economic ladder or remaining stuck on a lower rung.
To illustrate this concept in a slightly different manner think of the act of achieving wealth as being similar to climbing the stairs of a tall building. The Left claims that they want to see everyone have the opportunity to climb up as many floors as possible. Yet raising tax rates actually prevents this from happening because with higher tax rates the faster you climb, the faster you get shoved back down. The Buffett’s of the world are already living in the penthouse as it is, so they don’t need to concern themselves with climbing faster. However, if you are at the lower levels and fighting hard to advance yourself it is far easier to climb when you get to take 10 steps forward in income for every 1 step backward in taxes compared to being forced to take the 5 steps backward in taxes that you experience from higher rates. The Left is constantly pointing out the ever widening divide between the wealthy and the poor while at the same time they naively espousing the very tax rules that allow such a widening to occur. If the Left were truly as compassionate about the poor as they claim they would be demanding lower tax rates at all levels to enable opportunity for advancement instead of stagnation.
Mark Etterling
You can find Mark’s published work at the link below:
Rich Hoffman
The Future: A strategy guide to meeting it politically, philosophically and through religion
Much of the work I do here, and why I conduct it so fervently, is because the human race is at an impasse, and the quality for which we deal with that issue will determine our species fate. When I blast away at the progressive political platform it is not just to embrace the values I find valuable which might be summed up in every John Wayne movie ever made, or the tone of Walt Disney’s America shown gallantly in the television series Davy Crocket. What I love about America is captured in those artistic tributes to traditional value, because within those tabernacles of virtue is a formula for human prosperity. Progressives on the other hand are stuck in an old version of human fairness pursuit from a world that predates the Industrial Revolution and are functioning from a philosophy that is dangerous to themselves and everyone on this planet—the concept of collectivism. The reason why is in what is coming up rapidly for the human race—because each and every one of us must come to grips with it very soon—as in thirty years or less. That perilous impasse that is meeting us faster than we are meeting “it” is called THE FUTURE. Watch the below videos carefully and take notes.
I have written extensively here about such a future. I have written about flying cars, cancer treatments, a real understanding of human history through unpopular revelations in the field of archaeology I have talked about advanced horticulture methods, and the miracles of the energy source Thorium. I have done all this to begin to place in your mind dear reader the changes that have been placed before us and to measure the value of correct decisions. If it seems that I am particularly obsessed with education, politics, and even religion it is because those three things most corrupt the purity of the future with unnecessary impediments caused by functioning from the wrong philosophy. This is why I often gush over the fictional stories of Star Wars, because I understand the power of myth all too well, and how myth shapes the philosophies of mankind. Once philosophy is built for the human mind, then religion is constructed to represent those values for the masses—and the philosophies of old, much of it that is collectively based must be cast away otherwise the future will be very dangerous place. Individually based philosophies will lead to great human achievement and prosperity for all. In the modern world Star Wars offers this type of philosophy as well as a way to meet the startling changes the future holds through technology—so I am a big fan. George Lucas has done a brilliant thing, he has shown how society can advance into the realm of our present future without destroying ourselves spiritually, or politically because the struggles of Star Wars are essentially over those concepts.
In the immediate future—I’m talking about decades, it will become optional to die a natural death. An aging body is a ridiculous concept that can now be controlled through stem cell construction. A body should be able to rebuild new tissue throughout its entire life even if that lifespan is 1000 years as was quite common for Biblical figures in the Old Testament. Modern pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies, (and now Obamacare) are holding back this technology to maintain their profit profiles, but it will not hold. The technology is about to surpass the restrictions of the medical field out of the sheer need for financial sustainability. The key to Social Security and Medicare is not more money, but less, because people will soon live to be 200 to 300 years old and they will still be working well past the age of 55 and 65 years old. Mankind will have to give up the idea of “the golden years” and traditional retirements because aging is about to become an unnecessary hardship.
With computing power being what it is now, and what it will be within 10 years, the mysteries of the human brain will be solved and the idea of what a “soul” is will become clear. Human being will gain the ability to UPLOAD their identities into other bodies which will prevent even accidental death by tragedy. In fact, sex, race, and even human ability such as strength, height, and physical attractiveness will all be options in the world of tomorrow. The idea that has been introduced to us all though avatar creation through social websites like Facebook and Twitter as well as the online gaming world are metaphorical instances of a reality that is coming to our daily lives. Online gaming such as seen on games like World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, and many others will become a reality for our own bodies—especially as the younger generation moves into their 40’s and 50’s. They will have no problem making these difficult psychological adjustments as they have been playing computer games their entire lives and have created thousands of online characters all representing key aspects to their human souls. The body those souls reside in do not matter as much as the essence of the spirit behind the soul.
Education of tomorrow will be as simple as uploading a new program into your home computer. A child could reasonably have uploaded onto their brains the entire wealth of knowledge of the human race in just a few decades from now completely eliminating the need for classrooms known so well in traditional education which has proven ineffective. 12 to 18 years of study in schools is unnecessary in the world of tomorrow as knowledge is simply an upload not created by neuron building through repetition as it is today, but data directly implanted onto neurons constructed upon an upload of the data. So holding on to the old, archaic formula that the government is driving is a foolish gesture that only holds society back unnecessarily.
There are literally millions of such difficult technical advances that are coming our way within the next hundred years so it is important that during these transitions government is reduced to a minimal amount, because these new technologies will be devastating in the hands of overreaching government dictators. It is best to eliminate these threats to the human race now rather than deal with them later when ousting their power will be much, much more difficult. But they will be ousted. Their days are numbered because I can say that the youth that grew up with online gaming will not put up with such restrictions. In video games many of the environments are best reflected by laissez-faire capitalism. It is this type of economy that is most prevalent in the online world because politicians have not learned how to loot off of it—but it’s too late. Too many people have had a taste of pure capitalism online, and will expect it in the years to come. Once they learn that the economy of the real world is caused by political tampering, they will become very angry—and active. Currently many citizens tune out of politics preferring fantasy evasion over grim reality so long as they have enough money to buy new video games and pay for their basic living needs. But if that is threatened, they will expect laissez-faire capitalism and won’t understand the politics of United Nation power grabs like Agenda 21 or the fairness merits of socialism. In the world of computer gaming no such fairness is appreciated since all computer users are equal—they can be as big and strong, fast or slow as they desire when they set up their avatars. What separates the good from the bad is effort and commitment something the most devout video gamer understands very well. It is only a matter of a few years that those kinds of options will be available to the masses in reality.
Some of the great quarterbacks of old from the game of Football is Doug Flutie and Joe Montana—both guys were about 5-10 weighting about 190 to 200 pounds. Just twenty years later most quarterbacks are 6-5 and weigh 240. Evolution is happening and technical advances will soon make quarterbacks that are 7 foot tall and weigh 300 pounds. These advances will occur because the game will demand it through competition. And if a player gets injured, instead of going on the IR for the rest of a season, he will simply upload himself into a new body that he has constructed to use as a backup while their primary body heals. Paralysis and handicaps will be a thing of the past. These things will happen whether or not we are ready for them, so it is our job to get ready for them, and to focus our philosophies and religious on ways to train our minds to contend with the adjustments. But the path of the political progressive is a doomed one. They are literally clamoring to outdated ideas that were put into motion a 100 years ago and are trying to hold society back politically to preserve them from the changes that are about to flood society with the dawn of a new age just as revolutionary as the Industrial Revolution.
Speaking for myself I never plan to retire. I don’t see myself living in a Florida condo taking 20 pills a day just to stay alive and watching the sun rise and set waiting to die. Rather 100 years from now I plan to still be active doing all types of projects pursing the ideas my mind craves to consume, and I plan to run over any political ideology that gets in the way of my doing it. I’m not in love with power or politics in any fashion. I just want to be left alone to live my life in the fashion I want to live it. And in the future it will only be easier—not harder to do such. The impediments of our age are manufactured and false made uselessly cumbersome to protect the empires of old and their out-dated thinking that runs counter to what’s coming. It does no good to pander to these types of people because it only delays the inevitable. The future is an exciting place but it will be radically different from the lives we live today. That is why it is important to preserve the American Constitution as the blueprint to a healthy society of tomorrow so that they power grabbers of corruption can inflict minimal damage in the days to come with archaic beliefs that are a century out-dated trying to hold back a future that is coming at us with a fury.
Rich Hoffman
Invasion of the United Nations: How Agenda 21 is coming after you and your neighborhood
If you ever wondered why your community is building sidewalks to nowhere, or cities seem hell-bent on constructing streetcars, or your local public school constantly uses terms like “global marketplace” and learning initiatives it is because your school, your city, and your community are following United Nations Agenda 21—and the goal of this diabolical scheme is foreign control of The United States with a gradual massive redistributive wealth plot spread across the entire world. In essence, the intention of Agenda 21 is designed to steal the wealth of America along with the tendency of freedom that only exists on the North American continent and replace it with a centrally controlled government functioning within the U.N. in Europe.
Agenda 21 has already been at work for over 20 years and it is only now that the intentions of robbing Americans of their freedoms are becoming evident. The strategy has been to gradually get Americans to accept government regulations they would otherwise reject by selling them little bits of goodness like parks and sidewalks in suburban areas so that trust will be earned in surrendering freedoms to a foreign entity, in this case a coalition of nations.
In my neighborhood of the ultra conservative Liberty Twp., Ohio Agenda 21 is showing up in the Vision Plan Committee as seen at the link below.
http://www.liberty-township.com/Planning-Zoning/2012-Vision-Plan-Update-2076.html
In the city of Cincinnati Agenda 21 is showing up in a program called Plan Cincinnati which can be seen here:
http://www.roxannequalls.com/home/plan_cincinnati_the_comprehensive_plan.html
I know Roxanne Qualls personally and can state emphatically that she is an ultra political progressive along the lines of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Mayor Mallory—Obama’s personal buddy. When questioned about Agenda 21, people like Qualls will laugh about what a conspiracy such a thing is—and she believes she is on the high side of morality, and will attack anyone who thinks differently from her. For context, I once gave Roxanne Qualls while she was Mayor of Cincinnati in 1996 a t-shirt in her office stating “TAKE AN AXE TO OUR TAX” to encourage her to vote for tax decreases. She of course laughed at me—as predicted and thanked me for the shirt which I’m sure she threw away as soon as I left her office. For the rest of the contents of that meeting it found its way in fictional form into my novel Tail of the Dragon where Chet Watson speaks to Governor Royce. That scene was based on my discussion with Foxy Roxy the ultra progressive. She has been advocating Agenda 21 since it’s creation in 1992 whether or not she called it out by name.
Most of the time the advocates of Agenda 21 have no idea how the plan came into their minds—they just know they support it without question. This is the case of Karen Mantia the current superintendent of the Lakota School District. After many years as a teacher, and furthering her education to obtain a doctorate in the field of education, she had to run the minefield of Agenda 21 studies that were pounded into her head for two decades. People who are successful in education learn to say yes to Agenda 21. Outcasts who question it find themselves unemployed and on the outside looking in. So the higher the degree of study in modern-day university, the more committed to Agenda 21 they are. There are a few exceptions that I can think of right off-hand, but without fail, those exceptions have very strong families to help those students off-set the global oriented training that is provided in both public education and colleges. Many advocates of Agenda 21 accepted in their education days to blindly acknowledge such concepts and if they deny the teaching they either drop out of school to preserve their own ideas, or they fail their classes—because tolerance of other opinions is not what college is all about—or public education for that matter. In fact the goal of public education is not to inspire children to learn—but to teach children what social class they belong to—so that Agenda 21 can sort out the beneficial to their cause from the malcontents.
It is likely that many of the teachers employed under Lakota Superintendent Mantia as well as the school board have never heard of Agenda 21, because they see themselves as simple cogs in the wheel and do not question such things. Agenda 21 is a machine of many such wheels all connected to shafts that drive the machine in ways that each part of the machine seldom analyzes and this is how such things get advanced against the wishes of mankind—and how tyrants rise to power. Well-intentioned fools blindly follow the follies of some United Nations power grabber in a plot designed to rob America of freedom and wealth and distribute it to the entire world with a one world government superseding the elections held in The United States. That is the world these people are pushing for and it all starts with a sidewalk in your local community, to subtly gain the approval of the public through a very manipulative game designed to rob humanity of freedom in a naive preservation of Mother Earth.
Agenda 21 is in its simplest form an attack on American sovereignty without destroying the cash cow that supplies The United Nations with most of their funding and military might. The hope by these progressive insurrection artists is that a slow conversion in America from an individual based capitalist nation to a collective based managed economy ruled by Socialist International can occur without disrupting the global economy, much of it still at the mercy of The United States. The progressives themselves are collectivist oriented old hippies still trying to bring about the kind of world they imagined while they were experimenting with drugs in the 1960’s and 70’s, and they are a disgusting lot. The only places that such a world can be created under such impractical market values is in government where they can steal tax money to build the world of their distorted dreams—because all such thoughts would be snuffed out in the competition of the private sector. Progressives are the greatest threat to modern freedom, because they are selfless entities serving a collective idea centered around Agenda 21. If allowed to continue, within twenty years suburb living will be illegal, land will not be able to be purchased in any capacity, and all businesses will be collectively owned by the state—run by the United Nations. This is why progressives must be defeated in public education, local politics, state politics, labor unions, and environmental goof-ball organizations. We must get progressives out of our pockets and out of our lives otherwise they will never stop until they have taken every last liberty from America. It must be acknowledged that the national debt is part of this take over strategy because it takes away the power of the United States to manage their own affairs as a sovereign nation. Debt too is part of Agenda 21. So the threat is very, very real, and it is up to each and every American on how they deal with this crisis—because a crises it is. Ignoring Agenda 21 will not make it go away. Silently dismissing progressives won’t dull the knives they intend to stick in the heart of personal liberty. Playing nicely with those who think differently will only result in more loses to the radical left which is behind Agenda 21—even though it was George Bush Sr., who helped bring it to being in 1992. Without fighting for our freedoms, we will lose them to those who wish to sell freedoms away because they are not strong enough, or mature enough to handle their own individual lives responsibly. And the first of those yielded liberties evaporate with the construction of the community side-walk through a designated “green space,” and a school levy to maintain the power of progressive teacher unions. These evils begin there and must be dealt with as threats to life itself. There is no middle ground on this. The proof is all around us.
For more on Agenda 21 CLICK HERE.
Rich Hoffman
The State of Public Education: Why it must be destroyed in current form
In relation to the Hostess Labor Strike that I wrote about yesterday, the issue of public education must be painted against this backdrop. CLICK HERE FOR REVIEW. Public education is controlled by radical labor unions who teach our children aspects of life that many of us may not agree with—such as sexual education that leans in a promiscuous direction, anti-capitalistic labor practices, large government expansion, and of course destructive global sciences that are rooted in belief and not fact. These would not be so problematic if parents had an option as to where they could send their children, and if they did not like the school and what it taught their children, they had the option of taking their child to another school that was more in line with their family’s beliefs. However, the union labor agreements with government help has helped create a destructive progressive monopoly that resides in each and every neighborhood in America and it is with these monopolies that the single greatest threat to The United States resides—the attack on the minds of our youth to learn things that are not only detrimental to themselves, but our nation—as is in evidence by the results of the 2012 election.
Labor unions in public school maintain a government backed monopoly, and when education employees wish to increase their wages, all they must do is strike forcing school boards and federal mediators to come in and resolve the labor dispute. Parents do not have the option to pick their kids up and take them to another school that does not have striking employees, busing cuts, or pay-for-play extracurricular activities because government has backed the labor unions into maintaining an education monopoly—forcefully taking money from property ownership to fund the monopoly. The only recourse a parent has who is displeased with this arrangement is to pull their child out of their local public school and teach them at home. But the scam still impacts them as their tax money will still be stolen from their property value whether or not the parents enjoy the product of public education.
When teachers strike, parents have no choice but to accept the product and this is wrong. This government arrangement with public education ensures that the teaching profession will always be paid much higher than the tax payers who pay their salaries with benefits that are lavish and among the best of their kind. The working hours are extraordinarily easy, and the other benefits are excessively good—and are granted because education has maintained this monopoly status with the guns of the government at their back leaving some radical teachers to advocate political beliefs to our youth without fear of competing ideas to filter out the actual merit. Parents are told to put up and shut up, and to simply pay their taxes, otherwise their property will be seized.
This is the state of public education, and it is one of the worst debacles of our modern age. It creates un-thinking youth, helpless parents, and advances the cause of destructive progressivism in American culture. I find the entire arrangement appalling, and I take great honor in being called by my progressive enemies, the LASH OF EXTREMISM. (CLICK FOR REVIEW.) Now that it is well known what is behind the labor movement within the education industry, I consider such a term to be the highest compliment. My only wish is that more people were not so chicken but to call these parasites what they are. Instead, they continue to put up with it when they know it’s wrong—instead of demanding something better. I am considered an extremist because I have demanded better for less money. I am considered an extremist for expecting the kids of my community to learn about capitalism instead of communism, to demand that teachers live within a wage structure that everyone else does, and to ask for options so that education monopolies can’t be allowed to loot a community’s wealth from property value and re-distribute that wealth to democratic politicians who advocate legal socialism. It is a high compliment indeed to be called an extremist by such social parasites just for demanding options.
Rich Hoffman
The Progressive Zombie Apocalypse: How to defeat the vile creatures from blue voting zones
Some words that come to describe an Idiot: mooncalf, zombie, congenital idiot, born fool, the mentally handicapped, cretin, moron, fool[1] In fact, it would appear that more than 60 million idiotic Americans are now part of the Progressive Zombie Apocalypse. I have shown you dear reader how to defeat these progressive zombies who are more politely termed as diabolical idiots. If you have forgotten what I’ve said and done in the past click the link below to review.
THE WLW INTERVIEW OF RICH HOFFMAN’S GUIDE TO DESTROYING PROGRESSIVE ZOMBIES
A quick look at the map of the United States below will show you where these zombies live because they voted for Barack Obama. The map is a county-by-county map of a recent voting record and it can be seen that more than 51% of the zombie voters who are otherwise idiots put Obama back into power reside in these small blue areas. That leaves the vast sum of the red counties unrepresented in American government and at the mercy of the zombies as they migrate out of the diabolical blue areas. 
Progressive zombies might look and sound like the rest of us, but they aren’t. Much like the famous Michael Jackson video Thriller, all too often we learn too late that the progressive zombies are our own next door neighbors who have been seduced and consumed by a progressive agenda.
So follow my guide to defeating these progressive zombies by calling them out by name and letting them know that they will not suck the blood out of America without a fight.
But more than anything, do everything you can to avoid idiots, because it is the path of the low intelligence fool who first become progressive zombies. Pay attention to current events, read books, and attend Tea Party gatherings and you can go a long way to avoiding the sinister threat of becoming another progressive zombie in an apocalypse that is threatening America.
[1]The Original Roget’s Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (Americanized Version) is licensed from Longman Group UK Limited. Copyright © 1994 by Longman Group UK Limited. All rights reserved.
Rich Hoffman
The Hostess Company Folds: Government in bed with communist labor unions
The unions in America have had it all wrong from day one. When Andrew Carnegie had to endure one of the first labor strikes from a worker’s union in one of his Pittsburg steel plants, he was guilty of working his employees too long, too often in a bloodthirsty quest to compete with J.D. Rockefeller in Cleveland as the richest man in The United States. In business, competition is what drives the flow of money, and between Rockefeller and Carnegie there was a brutal competition between the two men that almost single-handedly ushered America into the modern age with innovation and wealth. Billions of people world-wide benefited directly from the ruthless competition between those two men. But Carnegie had crossed the line pushing his workers too hard. This caused the desperate workers to look toward the fairly recent writings of Karl Marx for a solution in much the same way that the Bolsheviks roughly 20 years later would use Marx to overthrow the bourgeoisie class in Petrograd under the banner, “workers of the world unite!” The steel workers at Carnegie’s Pittsburg steel mill went on strike and took possession of the plant which was their mistake. They had a right to walk off the job leaving the task to new workers to fill, but they did not have the right to take possession of the plant, believing themselves inaccurately to be equal owners in the company’s assets simply because they were employed at the plant.
Carnegie owned the mill as the workers simply sold their labor to him for a price. If the workers did not like the price, or thought they could do a better job, under capitalism they have the right to walk away from the job and go into direct competition with Carnegie if they wished. But under socialism—which the labor unions functioned under then, and to this very day—they believed they were equal partners with ownership in the companies they worked for simply because they showed up for work. Carnegie’s response to the labor strike was to call in the Pinkerton boys.
Allan Pinkerton (1819-84), was a Scottish-American detective. Born in Glasgow, Scotland, Pinkerton came to the United States and settled near Chicago in 1842. While engaged in business as a barrel maker in 1846, he captured a gang of counterfeiters and was consequently elected county sheriff. In 1850 he organized Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency and was appointed the first city detective in Chicago. The recovery of a large sum of money stolen from the Adams Express Company and the discovery of a plot to murder Abraham Lincoln in 1861 made his reputation. During the American Civil War he organized the secret service of the U.S. Army. During the railroad strikes of 1877, his agency provided strikebreakers. His books include Strikers, Communists and Tramps (1878) and Thirty Years a Detective (1884). After the Civil War Pinkerton put together a band of mercenaries who would go around the country for hire and attack unions who attempted to seize American businesses. Carnegie hired Pinkerton to break up the strike at his Pittsburg steel plant where the workers barricaded themselves across the entrance. Pinkerton in defense of Carnegie’s ownership of the plant gunned down the workers to break the strike and retake possession of the plant from the theft induced by the labor union.
Eventually over the next 100 years labor unions would embed themselves into many companies and would stop work in an attempt to extort more pay and benefits from corporate owners with the threat of violence under the banner of communism. Government climbed into bed with the communist movement migrating through American capitalism and made such actions as Carnegie utilized by hiring Pinkerton illegal—which allowed communism to mix with American capitalism in a contentious century long stand-off. The result has been the decimation of the steel industry, that started in America, the destruction of the car industry, which has been artificially propped up by government to prevent the inevitable bankruptcy imposed by the auto worker legacy costs, and a destructive spread of organized labor into government positions such as firefighters, cops and teachers—fulfilling the undercurrent strategy of the communists all along to attack private property in America by taxing it to fund those infrastructure government labor jobs excessively. Even though Carnegie pushed his workers over the edge with poor wages and intense hours—his workers did not have the right to take his property. Labor unions function in modern times with the same foolish belief, that it is they who own part of a company simply because they are employed.
We see the same things happening today. Witness the statement provided by the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union that was supporting the strike of its members against the Hostess Company and witnesses their response to the demand by management that they report to work on Thursday November 15th. “Our members decided they were not going to take any more abuse from a company they have given so much to for so many years. They decided that they were not going to agree to another round of outrageous wage and benefit cuts and give up their pension only to see yet another management team fail and Wall Street vulture capitalists and ‘restructuring specialists’ walk away with untold millions of dollars.”
The strikers are functioning communists whether they know it or not by definition. FOR FURTHER PROOF OF THIS HISTORY, CLICK HERE. The Hostess Company had to figure out where they could afford to operate as a company as the marketplace had changed for their products over the years and their legacy costs had made their profit forecast impractical. The strikers believe that the owners of Hostess should take all the risk of providing jobs, and shoulder all the responsibility involved without having the opportunity to become wealthy. They believed that the wealth created by Hostess should be shared equally, which is absolutely incorrect. Such a belief is clearly outlined in their statement to Hostess management.
Communists have always made war against what they perceive to be the bourgeoisie class (owners) against the proletariat (workers). In fact, President Obama made his entire re-election campaign based on this labor argument, hoping to stir up the communist seeds that had been planted in America by labor unions for over a century. This is why Obama is viewed as a socialist and outright communist advocate. Communism is the antithesis of capitalism—and America became the wealthiest country on Earth because of capitalism.
Hostess is now out of business because the labor unions crushed the company with demands by the workers that the company could not provide. As I write this, labor unions are trying yet again to infiltrate the retail giant Wal-Mart on Black Friday with a worker walkout right in the middle of the busiest time of year, intentionally hurting the employer at a critical time. Wal-Mart knows that if they allow unions to break through their management ranks, the company will never survive. Wal-Mart must fight off union take-over constantly to allow them to continue to do what has made them successful, and that’s provide many retail items at a low price to consumers. Once organized labor gains the ability to shut down production, or shopping hours with labor stoppage, customers will turn away from Wal-Mart and go to Target or some other retailer that does not have radical workers harassing them at the front door. People shop at Wal-Mart because they want to purchase items cheaply, and without hassle. If Wal-Mart cannot provide that, then their company, like Hostess, will be over.
What happened to Hostess has already happened to countless steel mills, and many traditional American businesses. It is because of labor unions that businesses have moved overseas and taken their jobs with them. In America, government has sided with labor unions, not American business—unless that business sends a lobbyist to Washington. With the help of labor unions, congressman and senators have learned that they can make capitalism in America be a “pay-to-play” sport, just like many public schools are doing these days when they don’t get their extortive school levies passed. Ten years ago Fidelity did not have a lobbyist in Washington. Today they do. Microsoft in the 90’s learned the cost of not having a “man in Washington.” They were sued by the government for being a monopoly—because they didn’t have someone greasing the wheels. Today they do. Labor unions today work with government to shake down American companies for everything they can and at a certain point, when the profit just isn’t worth it any longer, the companies just sell, move to a less hostile environment, or just go into bankruptcy like Hostess is doing now taking with it foods that we all know and love.
The labor unions are functioning under a communist philosophy intended all along by the writings of Karl Marx to destroy the wealthiest country on the face of the planet with a slow bleeding attack on capitalism. The government got into bed with labor unions by making actions like Pinkerton illegal. Companies can no longer defend their property from communist insurrections—but instead must call in a federal mediator who is almost always on the side of big labor—unless the company can hire an army of lawyers to do through the government court system what the Pinkerton’s did with a gun—and destroy the lives of the attackers.
Either way the looting government employees make their way off into comfortable retirements and island condominiums as they profit off the battles of communist labor unions and capitalist corporations. The sad thing about the whole mess is that nobody gave a damn until they learned they might not be able to buy Twinkies any longer at their local grocer. But believe me—Hostess is just the tip of the iceberg. Hundreds of similar companies are in the same boat, and if parasitic labor unions are allowed to destroy them, they will all be gone soon—and in London, England from his ratty grave, Karl Marx is laughing at the havoc he reeked upon the world with the most corrosive economic theory ever devised—one that would ultimately stop the economic engine of America so slowly that the people wouldn’t even realize it had happened, until they lost something they deeply treasured, like the Hostess Company, and the snack cakes that came to define entire generations.
Rich Hoffman
A New Strategy for Republicans: Fund a porn actress for President in 2016
I will readily admit that my view of America is traditional and I see Democrats dragging my country progressively to the left using the Overton Window concept. I do wish to erase the political gains they have made over the last 60 years. I do not say such things to bring harm to other races, or sexes. America through a Republican ended slavery, and was the first country on Earth to actually free anybody. Time would have taken care of the rest in spite of any interference by looting politicians. But Democrats have taken the credit over the years for the good deeds done by many strong Americans and they have continuously manipulated our country toward socialism acting as an internal enemy, and I am ready to see their influence upon my life diffused.
For many years the threat of a third-party candidate in Presidential politics has weakened the Republican Party considerably and forced them to adjust from the image of the party of “rich angry white guys” to one that is more inclusive to other ideas and people. This is in no small part a strategy cooked up in the minds of the worst, most diabolical progressives, as they have helped fund such third-party candidates so to split the will of the Republican Party.
The same should be done to Democrats, the very wealthy donors who have spent fortunes propping up candidates like Mitt Romney, and Newt Gingrich should instead pour their money into a fourth party candidate that will divide the votes of the Democratic Party. Republicans will always have to deal with Libertarians who naturally contain discontented Republican voters. The Democrats need their own menace to erode their stranglehold on American politics.
My suggestion would be a porn actress such as seen below. Pouring money into such a disrespectable candidate would pull away many of the votes that Democrats currently get. It would specifically target the drug users, the sexually addicted, the labor unions, the politically illiterate, and the diabolically stupid. There is no question that many in the Democratic Party would vote for a porn actress with the same enthusiasm that they have for Barack Obama, or the future candidacy of Hillary Clinton. In fact, a porn actress would help split the women vote who overwhelming cast their ballots for Democrats.
All this would work very well for Republicans and allow them to return to management of the government while the miscreants of society would fight over different versions of sluts to represent the sleazy and disrespectful. Failure to do so will guarantee more losses of more elections and eventually destroy the Republican Party completely under democratic mob rule of a socialist society. Republicans need to play such a game because future elections will be between Libertarians and Republicans forever, leaving Democrats untouched and unified. So it is time to give Democrats some competition within their own party for the good of the country and that needs to happen by funding their demise with a candidate who will split their support in the future—like a brainless porn actress to represent the mindlessly destitute and weaken the power of their vote in future elections.
Rich Hoffman
Voter Fraud in Ohio: The Obamanation calls into Alex Jones Show
Not much of a chance that the government whose in power, supported with cheers and whistles by the OBAMANATION, will ever investigate the multiple reports of voter fraud in Ohio and Florida. But Alex Jones has done a great job of covering these controversial issues, and this has made many Obama supporters very upset, and they have called in to Alex’s show to harass his team into not reporting the incidents. What follows is a fascinating radio broadcast that articulates the kind of collectivists who supported Obama’s re-election.
You can’t make this stuff up. It’s all in Agenda 21. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.
Rich Hoffman

Glenn Beck Calls Speaker Boehner “Ball-less”: Companies already laying off to avoid Obamacare
Republicans, this is the cost of not fighting hard enough. This is the cost of compromise, of “playing nice.” Compromise is not a dirty word if you are a progressive, but for everyone else, it’s as dirty as an entire sewage system. One of the great fall outs of Obamacare is that employers must provide the government mandated insurance if employees work over 28 hours per week. This will cause small companies like Target, and Walmart, and Home Depot to only allow their employees to work 28 hours per week. Welcome to the first costs of Obama’s re-election.
John Boehner is a nice guy, and he is my congressman–heck he’s practically my neighbor. I like the man. But Beck is calling the situation the way many Republicans are feeling it, and it is only going to get worse. For all those idiots who voted for Obama, and begged him to steal from the rich to give to the poor, and crush American businesses–good luck at finding a new job. Because they will be harder to come by than ever. Welcome to the OBAMANATION!
Rich Hoffman



