Tag: education funding

Understanding The Laffer Curve: Why tax increases of any kind won’t work

Before any intelligent discussion can be made about taxes and how much a society should contribute to them, the general economic theory of the Laffer Curve must be explored. For those who have no idea what the Laffer Curve is, the video below will teach you in a very concise way. Understanding the Laffer Curve is paramount to grappling the most compelling arguments of modern politics.

Many people who work in and around government without question are the type of people who are willing to contribute 50% to 70% of their incomes to paying taxes—after all, all the money they make comes from the community treasuries, so anything they receive is more than they would have had to earn on their own merits. This is also why government work tends to pay so well, because they are expected to support extra costs like union dues and excessive taxation without protest. The Laffer Curve for government workers who lean in the direction of socialism is statistically over 50%. However, for a person like me, my Laffer Curve is around 10%. Anything more than 10% of my income I consider to be a waste of money on government services I don’t want, need, or philosophically support. For a person like me, it is not worth opening a new restaurant, opening a new coal mine, or even building a rocket to explore space because the taxes on my earned income exceeds my personal Laffer Curve.

I may be willing to lend myself to other businesses as a “hired gun” to help them deal with their business troubles even if my income is taxed above 30% because I can negotiate in my loss to the government in my fee. It doesn’t matter to me so long as I get my money, and the purchaser of my services gets what they are hiring me for. But to carry all the responsibility of opening, operating, and maintaining a business when the taxation rate exceeds 10% for me is just not worth it. So I will not contribute to the economy in this fashion because the Laffer Curve is too radically on the wrong side of the chart for me. The people who think like I do are what the American economy might consider “underutilized capital.” We tend to tinker in our garages and write books instead of doing other things America might consider more economically productive because the Laffer Curve on our taxable income is too high. It is these kinds of people who pull the statistical Laffer Curve chart hump to the 33% mark. Government types support a Laffer Curve of 50% to 70%–and people like me support a Laffer Curve of 10%. That is how 33% is reached as an average.

When Obama and the minions of communist oriented government insist on higher taxes on the “rich” they are essentially pushing the Laffer Curve too far to the right statistically causing more of the productive to take their bags of money and quit, joining me in the garages of life playing with their Craftsman tools, building cars, working on motorcycles, and thumbing their noses at government. Obama assumes that the “rich” will be just as motivated to deal with all the headaches of business ownership if their personal Laffer Curves are moved to percentages increasingly over the 50% mark, and that is where the failures occur. Many will not and proportionally the higher the percentage of taxable income moves higher on the Laffer Curve, the more people will drop off the chart, cut their losses, and not participate economically.

Obama doesn’t understand this kind of thing because he was trained to be a communist by his mentors, he never tried to operate a business prior to his political career, and he is currently a public parasite—meaning he lives off tax money as a government employee. He is not a value added citizen—meaning his existence does not contribute positive dollars to any economy, he simply takes by the essence of his life. Obama learned in college that the Laffer Curve is way out there at the 70% mark, and he believes it to this day. He looks at people like me who reside at the 10% mark and get angry with us. He signs Executive Orders by the stacks fantasizing that if he strong arms enough, that my type of people will decide for our own health and well-being that we will move our Laffer Curve up to 30% to 50%. But he is wrong and foolishly naive. In response, my type of people will simply go “pirate” and find other ways to shield our assets from the government trolls who wish to steal our property, starting with our money. Instead of complying with the government we will seek ways to undermine it, and gain back the values lost to looters like Barack Obama and his tax grabs.

It is because of the Laffer Curve that Obama’s “tax the rich” scam won’t work. The radical activists whom serve his private council are people like Richard Trumka, Van Jones, and other radical progressive/communist supporters and their Laffer Curves are well above the 50% range, because they are not the type of productive people who make anything. So anything that comes their way is more than they would have obtained if they just sat on their couches at home and watched TV. So they clearly support higher taxation on the Laffer Curve since they directly benefit with very little investment on their part. What their vision does is destroy the incentive for people who reside with a Laffer Curve of 10% to 20% to stay home and not play the game—which means less wealth is created, and the economy will recede instead of expand.

Many CEO types, many of the rich, many of the movers and shakers of the American economy attempt to stay on the good side of government with charity work, political contributions, and celebrity appeasement. Even the “rich” like Warren Buffet who supports the higher taxes on Obama’s Laffer Curve cozy up to people like Obama to keep the government from stealing too much of his wealth while he uses new federal laws he helped to fashion to crush his competition—which is why he supports Obama’s tax increases. CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE. CEO’s try to play the game of politics to keep the Laffer Curve from moving too high up the graph. The closer to 0% the better, and when the Laffer Curve gets up over 40% the value of the efforts given to operate any kind of economic endeavor diminishes considerably—and retiring to a fishing village in Florida becomes much more preferable.

Government cannot change human nature, and they will never achieve acceptance of higher percentages on the Laffer Curve no matter what effort they employee, whether it be attempted force, or political maneuvers. Every human being has their cut-off point, and the further up the Laffer Curve the taxes go, the fewer people there are to contribute to a thriving economy. It is that simple. The foolish assumption by communists and political utopia builders is that financial producers will feel compelled to contribute equally to a world vision created by half-baked politicians and academic theorists—but producers won’t, because the value of those government fools is flushed out in the real world by what they contribute economically–which is very little. That is why the economy is tanking under Barack Obama, because he does not understand the Laffer Curve and like every pinhead dim-wit in the academic halls of universities, they have allowed their naive world vision to corrupt their logic and deny them the understanding of how the world works—and for them this is reflected on their personal Laffer Curves that are far up the ladder. The higher the tax rates on personal income Americans will decide with increasing frequency to withdrawal from economic creation and join me turning wrenches in their garages and simply watching football games all day on a Saturday afternoon and to say to hell with business and the government that loots off its back. That is what the Laffer Curve is and what it means to society.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Communism in Public Educaton: The California Teachers Union Video

Growing up at the end of the Cold War like I did, communism was a dirty word, and was a constant threat.  Many today think that the threat of communism went away after the collapse of the Soviet Union, which started in the early 60’s and was observed by intelligence officers as far back as the Cuban Missile Crises.  The Soviet Union was going to collapse, it was just a matter of time when.  They were collapsing because their political philosophy of communism destroyed ambition and productivity, leaving all of Russia and the gigantic land mass of China to turn those countries into the economies of the third world.  CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO.  Communism is an evil political philosophy because it demands national collectivism to work, which requires individual support—violating personal sovereignty.  Communism cannot work without destroying individuality, and in the process, destroying the kind of ambition that manufactures productivity.

But communism is not gone from the world—it has never left.   It is alive and well today through the labor movement, through the Obama presidency, through any nation’s tendency toward big government.  All that has changed with communism is that advocates have changed the names around to hide their true intentions.  This makes it hard to identify who America’s friends are from their foes when the red flag of the U.S.S.R is removed from the face of communism and is replaced with Barack Obama’s smiling mug advocating progressivism.  The threats to individual sovereignty is the same as it always has been, but the marketing of the ideas did change to appear less threatening, so that the idea of communism could spread all across the world—as was always the plan.  And no place in America is communism more present than in the public education occupation—exclusively because education is controlled by massive government backed teacher unions who plan to teach our children on the merits of communism while forcing them to live under a rainbow-colored umbrella of communism in their everyday lives.  The communists look and act like any other person in our general society—that is, until they open their mouths and begin to spew the long-held philosophic ideas of Karl Marx.  The dead giveaway that a person is a communist is that they advocate high taxes for the “rich” and wealth redistribution for the “middle class.”  For proof of this radicalism, look at the video produced by the California Teachers Union narrated by long time respected actor Ed Asner.  What is being advocated in this video is communism.  This is what our kids are learning in school with tax payer money off our property values.  This is the result of a communist attack from within America that has proven far more dangerous, and sinister than even the Cuban Missile Crises was during the Kennedy years.

I know this video and the producers of it are communists in spite of their declaration that they are “progressives” because their beliefs have been tried before, most notably in the Russian Revolution in 1917 Petrograd—known today as St. Petersburg.   For anyone wishing to learn more on this communism idea they should read We The Living by Ayn Rand, published in 1936 during the “Red Decade” here in America as a warning to those in The United States who were thinking of pushing communism during our own Great Depression.   The book is widely available at any book store today as Ayn Rand books are flying off the shelves as people are going back and learning what she was trying to say during the first half of the American 20th Century.  CLICK HERE TO READ MY REVIEW OF WE THE LIVING. Communists today fear Ayn Rand’s books, so they will ridicule anyone who attempts to read them.  In Ayn Rand’s novels—particularly We The Living she shows how the process happens, and it begins by demonizing the “rich,” those who produce jobs and generate the wealth of a country.  Communists wish to remove these “wealth producers” so that the government does not have any competition for that kind of activity.  In a communist country government wishes to be the job creators by distributing the looted wealth collected from the masses, so they must eliminate those who actually make things.  That is why they attack the “rich.”

The fundamental flaw that all communists suffer from is that they do not understand what makes wealth.   They believe that money is finite, that it is not a renewable resource generated from the ideas in an individual’s head and implemented by the companies that they create.   So communists attempt to steal the wealth that has so far been created, and then they sit on that looted wealth by redistributing it to the poor and middle class.  Then they wonder why their economies failing, because the value for things goes down as the wealth leaves the country like water running through a screen door.  Committees do not produce wealth, corporations do not produce wealth, and governments do not produce wealth.  All those collectivist organizations can only “manage” the wealth created by individuals.  America has had more wealth than any other nation because it has produced individuals who could think in such a fashion to manufacture wealth.   If those individuals are looted by their government, the individuals will stop manufacturing wealth, and soon the nation will fail with devalued currency, and become a society of middle-class looters looking to government to send a check they can live on in the mail.  When they don’t get it, they will protest—just like what is happening in Greece.

The California Teachers Union along with the rest of the public employees of that state are bankrupting it with their commitment to socialism/communism, and their mentality that was wonderfully evident in their video hosted by Ed Asner.  Communists are certainly alive and well, and if you send your child to a public school, they are being taught by communists, as classically defined.  Communists thrive in public education because there is no competition, so government has paved the way to spread communism into the minds of young Americans without any fear of competing ideas interfering.  If parents don’t like their children being taught by communists at their local school, they don’t have much choice but to home school their children (as my wife and I did for a time) or send them to a private school.  Sadly, it is time to stop kidding ourselves of the value of public education when it is now so obvious that public schools are teaching children the values of communism, instead of becoming productive capitalist in a thriving economy.

If you are an older person and can remember the Cold War, you should withdrawal your support from your public school any way possible.  If you send them your money, you are helping spread the communist message to our next generations.  CLICK HERE FOR PROOF THAT THE KGB INFILTRATED PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN THE 1960’s AND NEVER LEFT.  Younger parents, who did not grow up in such a time, won’t know what is going on because they are still too immature to see history playing out before their eyes, and they will not understand.  But for those of us who do, communists have to be removed from public education, and the best way to do that is to starve them out of their hiding places.  For more proof of this communist plot in all public schools, CLICK HERE, watch the video there before assuming that I’m pulling your leg.  Because I’m not, sorry to say.  

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

A Lesson on Government from George Lang: how things are supposed to work

Below is an example of how local government is supposed to work—at least as a sample of the type of debate that should transpire between the participants.  This is true no matter what kind of government is presented, whether it is a school board, a group of trustees for a township which is the example below, or a city council—the elected representatives are supposed to argue and hash out issues with passionate narrative in order to arrive at a proper conclusion.  In the example provided, West Chester Trustee George Lang argues against the proposal of trustee Cathy Stoker, and Lee Wong who are voting in favor of a contract renewal with the Fraternal Order of Police that has very lucrative benefits included.  Many of the employees being discussed make very close to six figures a year.  CLICK HERE TO SEE HOW MUCH AND WHO THEY ARE (there’s over 80 comments on that link that are very entertaining).  So the employees are already well compensated, and this new contract more than insures more of the same behavior, which Lang argues West Chester may find balancing a budget will be difficult in the coming years.  Watch for yourself:

George Lang was outvoted 2 to 1, but he still went to the trouble to make the public argument for the good of West Chester, and this is why it’s important to vote in favor of more representatives like Lang at election time.  In West Chester, Cathy and Lee’s seats are coming up for re-election, so there is a chance for West Chester to vote big spenders like those two trustees out of office in favor of managers who will behave more like George Lang.

The trend in most political organizations such as school boards, trustees and city councils is to try to achieve group consensus and this is where politics fails.  When the members of the governing body are more concerned about winning a popularity contest, or being accepted by the other governing members, the chance for spirited debate is effectively squashed, and does not happen very often.  In Lang’s situation of course his position will not make him popular with the public sector unions, but he is not concerned about those kinds of things—he is trying to manage the impact of the contracts cost against the ability of the tax payers of West Chester to pay the bill without tax increases, which is how the process is supposed to work.

Ultimately the video above reveals a much more sinister evil that is at the heart of every government deal involving any public sector union, and illustrates why school boards and other management organizations lose control of their costs—third-party arbitration.  In the video Cathy Stoker discusses that if the contract is not accepted by the trustees that a third-party will be called in to resolve the dispute and force the hand of the trustees against their will.  This third-party arbitration is exactly why school boards do not have the stomachs to fight teacher unions to manage their costs, because the union will force the dispute into arbitration and trump the elected school board.  School boards don’t want to be trumped, so they go along with whatever teacher unions’ support to avoid the third-party embarrassment.

The same threat is present when involving fire fighter unions, and police unions.  In West Chester, Cathy Stoker showed in the video that she is very concerned about third-party arbitration forcing upon them costs that exceed the contract they are agreeing to, while George Lang suggests that the trustees should force the issue into arbitration and fight it out in an effort to save the costs against the tax payers of West Chester.  Lang knows that if they lose their arbitration hearing, he would then have the leverage in the media to blame the arbitration process for the high taxes imposed by the third-party.  So he is willing to roll the dice, whereas Stocker and Wong aren’t.  But at least the debate happened and all three trustees didn’t mindlessly accept the contract without spirited discussion.

When electing these kinds of politicians it is more beneficial to elect fighters instead of people who will just lie down and say “uncle” in the face of third-party arbitration.  It is this threat that drives up the cost of all these public sector workers with teachers, fire fighters, and police departments.  Public sector unions should be illegal, and third-party arbitration by un-elected officials should also be illegal.  The laws that protect this system are a travesty against the tax payers.  But thank God not all politicians are mindless “yes men” who just go through the political motions so they can have the social popularity of a name-plate upon their desks.  Some politicians like George Lang actually try to manage the costs that impact his community, which is what he was elected to do.

For those reading this who are my community neighbors thinking of running for an office there are three school board seats coming up at Lakota, two seats coming up for the West Chester Trustees, and Liberty Twp has some seats coming up, it would be advisable for you to run for one of those seats.  If you need help getting in touch with people who can help with money to run for office, then feel free to contact me, and I’ll put you in touch with those who can help with your campaigns—because I’d like to see more people like George Lang in these local positions fighting on behalf of the tax payers in the years to come.  That is the key to solving many of our future problems circulating around sustaining community growth and maintaining a positive economic future, electing politicians locally who will actually do the job as well as George Lang does.

On the other side, an example of how the job is done poorly can be seen in the video below.

See the difference?  No wonder Detroit is broke and looks the way it does.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Progressives are at Fault for Most Gun Violence: Why the 2nd Amendment is “REALLY” needed

I have heard enough about the gun argument that took place after the Jovan Belcher shooting/suicide which occurred at Arrowhead Stadium, in Kansas on Saturday December 1st.  Belcher for all the reasons that impassioned youth build up a fury in their minds saw no way out for himself but suicide after he shot his girlfriend—the mother of his young baby during an argument.  Many people have had such arguments with a loved one, and many times the rage can build up to a desire to obliterate the other person, even if deep down inside the love is great.  The mind often distorts reality when perspective is misplaced, and people often do stupid things when they are angry.  But as I’ve listened all week to the pundits fume for more gun laws, like what the big cities have around America—which are also Obama Zone voting blocs, the reality of the situation must be placed into perspective and not be allowed to migrate to the progressive arguments of rhetoric not based on reality.

The strongest case that progressive minded gun grabbing fools have for more gun laws is that the urban population is killing each other ruthlessly, and putting guns in the hands of such people is dangerous.   Jovan Belcher is a product of this ruthless urban culture that is so highly praised among the media—and it is the creation of this dependent based urban culture that is the cause of many of society’s modern troubles—including gun violence.  Progressives seeking to hide the crimes of their folly are pursuing fewer guns in society to cover up their political failures as a general philosophy.  Much of that urban culture progressive creation can be heard in modern rap music which many young people like Belcher listen to often.  The music is often violent, and contains a lot of race based anger, meant to fuel support of progressive philosophy, such as more welfare programs, an expanded and defined middle class, a destruction of American traditional value in favor of more global awareness with less individual sovereignty—along with a host of other platform points all of which can be seen in the Obama Administration.  When pictures of Jovan Belcher are sought online, he is often seen wearing headphones which is common among athletes before a game starts—and I would be willing to bet that the music he was listening to was not Mozart, or Bach.  If a young person puts garbage into their minds, of course garbage will come out in their behavior, so when young people like Jovan find themselves angry and insecure over being a new parent with a young baby that is depending on them to be a good person, and the spouse in a relationship has a whole set of values that are different from Jovan’s upbringing, conflicts are bound to happen, and Jovan dealt with the crises in the manner that he built the ideas in his head with like music, movies, television, and most likely large doses of meditating on the merits of “urban culture.”  To understand that culture all one needs to do is play the video game Grand Theft Auto.  I’m sure Jovan Belcher played that video game a lot.  In fact—I’d bet on it.

(YES THE VIDEO BELOW IS THE REAL GAME AS KIDS PLAY IT EVERY DAY.)

But that doesn’t mean that guns should be outlawed because Belcher used a gun to commit crime, or video games because they allowed Belcher to fantasize about being a street thug—shooting and raping “bitches” so you can score points in a game like players do in GTA.  It doesn’t even mean that music should be edited in any manner.  If people like the urban stuff, the market has a right to exploit that consumer need.  But who created that market need—where does it come from?  Progressives—they are the ones who made the welfare culture, they are the ones who created the modern ghetto, they are the ones who are responsible for much of the gang violence that goes on, the drug use, the sex driven diseases like AIDS, the out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and progressives are responsible for destroying the modern family leaving many young people like Jovan Belcher without a good role model in their lives in the form of a father.  Progressives have attacked the America father of tradition and attempted to replace them with a central government, and that is the cause of most social failures. The gun violence is just the symptom of the sickness created by progressives in urban neighborhoods, which nobody in their right minds would want to live in.

Where I live I would say that 90% of the homes within a mile of my home are armed with at least two guns and I can report that we do not shoot each other—ever.  The guns are there for target shooting, for personal protection, and on occasion hunting.  But there is an even more important reason for having those guns—they are there in case the military fails us, and the government moves too far to the left for our liking, we will need to use those guns to take back our country from a military that we have wasted a lot of money arming and training only to be used against us as a weapon.

One year ago President Obama with the support of the House and Senate passed the NDAA Act which gives permission to whoever is president at the time to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans violating their 5th Amendment rights on only the suspicion of terrorist activity by the president as defined by that same Executive Brach holder.  I can say that if such a thing happens, I will no longer recognize the laws created by the thieves in Washington and an armed revolution will become necessary to overthrow the tyrannical government.  That’s why we have guns, because government cannot be trusted except when the threat of armed revolt is present.  If the government goes bad, the armies, and militias that are talked about in the Constitution become the weapons of that government leaving Americans defenseless.

In case political pussies like Bob Costas and the other progressive cry babies in the modern media didn’t notice, most of America did not vote for Barack Obama, by land mass.  It is the urban vote that did–the costal regions and cities with huge sections of Section 8 housing and strong labor union presences.  America as a whole is not in agreement with the idiots of New York and their progressive gun bans because deep down inside of everyone I talk to from all walks of life there is a strong belief that our guns will be needed to preserve our independence from progressives such as The United Nations and other members of Socialist International.  The U.N. is making their global land grab using the same progressive philosophies that helped shape the mind of Jovan Belcher.  It’s just a paper conquest as opposed to a traditional siege.  (And for my older readers here, sorry for my use of strong language, but it’s needed in this case.  There is more coming at the end, just to warn you)  The characters who want to grab our guns today are the same type of people we will have to fight tomorrow, and to surrender our defense against their parasitic aims would be a fool’s paradise.

Every idiot who called out for more gun control in the wake of this most recent tragedy is one of the types of progressive minded people who helped shape the mind of Jovan Belcher in the first place.  If Belcher did things in his life my way, he would learn to hunt and fish on his own, he’d know how to fix his own things in life both mechanically and psychologically, and he’d be listening to classical music on his iPod instead of urban rap, and he would have paid attention.  Young people love leadership, they soak it up like a sponge, and it says a lot that Belcher went to see his coach in the darkest hour of his life—probably because that was the strongest male figure in his life at the time.  Most of the urban crimes in society could be solved if the world had more strong fathers for young people to look up to, because the progressive experiment of destroying fathers is what caused Belcher and many other troubled youth to not have the mental faculties to deal with crises in their lives.  The fault is progressives and their urban culture policies, and the fix is in introducing young people like Belcher at an early age to more self-reliance, and positive role models.  Progressives have sought to destroy positive role models so that society would have a greater need for a more centralized government who cared for everyone and everything, and the world with its current miseries is their fault.  So with that said it was not the gun that caused the terrible events at Arrowhead Stadium, it was progressive philosophy, and for that they can all hang their heads in shame.

And to my conservative mild-mannered friends—don’t be afraid to call people like Costas a pussy—because he is.  He makes a living interviewing celebrities and commenting on sports—the worlds great distraction.  He had no right to bring his ass kissing ways to our living rooms when all we wanted to do was watch grown men run into each other at full speed and knock the shit out of one another.  Costas should have kept his mouth shut and not stuck his nose into an issue he is not qualified to speak on—since he has made a living as a “yes man” not a defender of liberty or even a man of self-reliance which to me is the only kind of man there is.  Tyranny and slavery are built on the backs of people like Bob Costas who seek to fix the symptom, not the cause so that the bright lights of a football game can resume without guilt.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

France Calls Obama a Socialist: ‘World of Warcraft’ is all about CAPITALISM

It might be recalled that I have discussed in great detail free to all that the world willing to read that global governments are moving toward socialism because they lack the financial strength and productivity of America and can only hope that socialism will save their skins from years, and years of government mismanagement.  (CLICK HERE FOR THE MAP to see how socialism is infecting earth with a destructive political ideology.)  In America since socialism is a public relations nightmare—or at least it used to be, the word “PROGRESSIVE” has been used instead, and has been slowly sold through the public education system to naive young minds as busy parents simply needing a baby sitter didn’t pay any attention.  The result has been in America a mixed ideology of capitalism and socialism which is kind of like being in a marriage where the couple hates each other, but stay together for the kids.  Socialism is always looking to undermine capitalism as peace is just not an option, the two cannot co-exist.

I have declared openly that Obama is a functioning communist.  It looks as though he was raised as a communist and it’s all he knows.  And as anyone who understands such things knows, socialism is a big step toward communism.  Socialism is like having a diet Pepsi where communism is a regular Pepsi.  They are both sodas, but one is loaded with all kinds of nasty things, whereas the diet drink is intended to simulate the regular drink while avoiding all the nasty stuff.  Because Obama is a communist advancing the diet drink of socialism with great abundance the American economy is suffering terribly, and nobody wants to discuss it because socialism is a bad word in America.  So nobody calls it out by name.

Socialism started in America with labor unions and really kicked into gear during the Red Scare in the 1930’s leaving the progressive president FDR to enact many socialist American programs in his New Deal  to respond to global communism that was sweeping the planet.  This is how we ended up with Social Security and many other intrusive government programs.  But socialism didn’t stop there of course and is now advancing aggressively under Obama into nationalizing industries by the Federal government so that central authority control can be put in place—which has been the intention of communists all along—supported openly by many politicians, Obama simply being the latest.

It is hard for many people to believe, but the truth is what it is.  In Europe, which politicians like Obama love as an example of governance—but traditional Americans despise–socialism is out in the open.  In fact France has a socialist president.  In England socialism was hidden behind the name of the Labour Party and of course in America it was sold as the party of Democrats and the umbrella of Progressive politics.  But now Greece and Spain have openly supported the actual title of socialism.

Of course all these countries functioning under socialism are failing economically because socialism takes away personal responsibility and allows the weak and unproductive to feed off the exploits of the productive, and such a theory will never work in a million years.  It’s naive at best.  So after the French president was criticized for his high taxes on the rich, and companies threatened to shut down because they are owned by “the rich,” he simply replied that France could nationalize its industries instead of them functioning under private ownership, and he pointed at Obama as his gleaming example for what was going on in the United States.  Click the link below for more info.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/french-socialist-on-business-move-whats-the-big-deal-were-just-doing-what-obama-does/

It cannot be denied any longer.  Socialists are attacking our American way of life and they are doing so ruthlessly.  They are in essence predatory parasites, meaning they function as a collective of weaklings that require the looted efforts of strong backed individuals to carry them through life.  So it is time to meet them on the battle field and stop coddling them like infants crying for a pacifier.  Without capitalism America will fail, and for all the young kids reading this who thinks that what I’m saying won’t affect them, let me provide an example of capitalism and socialism that they might understand.  In the world of video games, over 10 million people play World of Warcraft.  Many of those 10 million people spend 5 to 6 hours a day playing that massive online game in a world of their own making with other players all over the world.  On weekends they spend over 12 hours per day.  It is likely that many of those 10 million either voted for Obama or support him without knowing why.  The idea of extended unemployment benefits, higher minimum wages, food stamps and many other government programs is very appealing to these young gamers, because it gives them more time to play their favorite online game with their virtual friends.  But the reason these people play the game of World of Warcraft is because in the real world, their lives are much more limited, and heavily regulated.  In the game of W.O.W a game player can spend all day working hard for their currency and leveling up their characters because they can see the results.  W.O.W. is a successful game because it frequently rewards players keeping them interested in playing the game.  But imagine playing W.O.W all day every day and then having the makers of the game tell players that they must send 50% of all the credits they’ve earned, and the skills their characters have acquired back to the video game manufacture as part of their fee for keeping the game operating.  Or that the game designers wish to give new players in W.O.W some of the other players money so that World of Warcraft would be more “fair and even” for new players who wouldn’t have to feel so bad when they were playing with and against players who have invested 200 to 1000 hours of time on W.O.W and have leveled their characters up to become very powerful.  If the makers of World of Warcraft did such a thing, the game would become very unpopular, and people would leave.  That is the difference between capitalism and socialism.  W.O.W. is a very capitalist system.   Players pay a small fee to play the game but get to keep most everything they make and produce within the game.  That is why W.O.W is successful, just like any economy, real or virtual.

In fact, it is partly because of this massive online gaming presence that members of the United Nations under control of Socialist International are looking to regulate trade and access to the internet.  They have seen that online games are a threat to their global philosophy.  Games like WOW that has over 10 million active users, and Star Wars: The Old Republic which has over 1 million and growing since it’s a very new release, along with the many millions that play Call of Duty on Xbox live every day, or Madden Football, or any number of releases are enjoying online PURE CAPITALISM because there is no limit to what they can do, only what their minds and time can produce.   When politicians and even parents wonder what the great appeal is to online gaming with kids, it is that games are pure capitalism still, and Socialists International fears that realization because they control every other aspect of human life in some form or another—and have come to realize that they must gain control of the online world in some way soon—starting with an online sales tax.  When it is asked why kids don’t want to play outside anymore, think about it—half the neighborhood neurotic mothers who also vote for school levies pad their kids up for safety instead of letting them get bumps and bruises.  Making playing outside difficult with knee pads and helmets just to ride a bicycle pushes kids somewhere else where they aren’t so restricted, just like any businessman.  Kids go online and play games where they can be free.

Socialism takes away the ambition to do anything.  I feel it myself.  There are a lot of things I would do that society would greatly benefit from, but to be honest, I don’t want to deal with the pin-headed bureaucrats to make those things happen so I stay out of the market place.  If things were deregulated, I might do more that would benefit society, but since doing anything productive these days requires a major pain in the ass investment of time and money, it is simply not worth it.  So I write books, because looting socialist bureaucrats have not yet found a way to tax the ideas that come out of my mind since they don’t control my thinking.  And there is a part of me who understands young people who would rather play a video game than to start a new business.  Because in the game, even though none of it is real, the player at least gets to keep what they earned while investing their time.  In real life, politicians guided by socialism want to take some of what everyone earns, so many young people just lock themselves in their bedrooms and play World of Warcraft filing for food stamps and other welfare programs rather than get a real job that’s unsatisfying, because they want more time to play their games.

Socialism is the culprit that is ruining the lives of Americans, and it is politicians like Obama who are advancing that destructive political philosophy most aggressively.  It doesn’t matter how much he smiles, or speaks, and manipulates, he is a socialist who also happens to be a lawyer with a proven history of taking great liberties with the truth.  Whoever supports a person like Obama is a damned fool and is directly responsible for the destruction of America.  Because once Obama and his fellow socialist have nationalized the world’s economy, they will come after the video game industry to eradicate from the minds of mankind any trace of capitalism forever.  That is when the young people playing W.O.W. will have wished they paid as much attention to politics as they do the story lines of their video games, because if they had, they may have been able to stop the spread of socialism that destroyed everything they knew and loved.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Understanding the “Fiscal Cliff”: Promises to Obama’s Jakarta playground friends

One of the big reasons that it is important to know what kind of person the President of the United States is, why they should be born in America, why they should not have communist parents, why they should at least have attend school in the States, is to avoid catastrophes like what we are all facing with the upcoming “fiscal cliff” negotiations, where I have pointed out over and over again that Obama has only one goal, to spread the wealth as he learned from the ideas of Marxism not just across America, but the entire world.  Many people forget that the little boy Obama as a grade school lad did not attend education in America for his entire youth, it was in Indonesia.  When he played outside, it was not in America that he played, but in the third world country of his mother’s second husband, and his world view was certainly shaped by those events, as has become exceedingly obvious.  Obama clearly wishes to drain the wealth of America so that places like his childhood home of Indonesia can prosper and he is using the theories of communism to justify his wealth distribution policies.   However, many people don’t know these things about Obama.  They simply know that he is the first black president and for them that is good enough.  They do not care that Obama does not have the management skills to pay one 14-year-old to cut his grass, let along manage the affairs of the Executive Branch.  They also do not care that Obama’s communist background is at the core of his willingness to send America over the fiscal cliff that is coming up at the end of December.  In fact, many Americans have no idea what the “fiscal cliff” even is, so for them I present my radio friend from Michigan, Matt Clark on 1600 WAAM as he explains very well what the average person needs to know about this upcoming crises.  Have a listen.

As far as I’m concerned the Bush Tax Cuts are too high, so the discussion of anything more is not even on the radar.  I view the federal government as a bunch of crooks that are unable to do anything else productive in their lives but steal money through taxation.  The only way they can give value to their lives is by stealing money from the public through taxes, then doing something through wealth redistribution to the less fortunate so they can feel they’ve done something useful in their pathetic lives.  Meanwhile, they enrich themselves well out of the range of financial suffering with crooked back-room deals all up and down K-Street where just a few blocks from The White House where Obama tucks his children into their beds at night, prostitutes and drug dealers perform every reprehensible task imaginable, and many of the law makers on Capitol Hill are in on the act in some way or another.  So more taxes no matter who they are on means only more criminal behavior from the looters who serve as law makers in Congress, the Senate, and Executive Branch, and I wouldn’t think of giving any of those idiots even a tip at a restaurant let alone more money.  They have done a reprehensible job of managing the American economy and shouldn’t be awarded.

Obama however appears to be living out a promise he made to boyhood friends on the playgrounds of Jakarta, living in a Menteng Dalam neighborhood in the Tebet subdistrict, then from 1970 in a wealthier neighborhood in the Menteng subdistrict.   From ages six to ten, Obama attended local Indonesian-language schools: St. Francis of Assisi Catholic School for two years and Besuki Public School from one and half years, and even the nicest of these places would be considered “dumps” by American standards.  Obama seems to want to steal the wealth of America so his old neighborhoods in Jakarta can prosper off the loot.  This is why he doesn’t care if the American economy tanks, if the whole system collapses, because his loyalties are not to American citizens, but his boyhood friends from Indonesia.   There is nothing about Obama’s behavior that leads me to believe he has any patriotic American sensibilities, and this is the kind of person that Republicans are negotiating with.  Obama is an Islamic sympathizer who pretends to be a Christian, and he’s a communist who pretends he’s a capitalist.  He is as misleading about his background and intentions fiscally as Bill Clinton is socially—always saying one thing, while meaning something else entirely.

So as the “fiscal cliff” draws near, understand that you have all been warned.  The personalities driving the train to the cliff are a variety of radicals all with different agendas.  But Obama’s is the most foreign of them all.  Obama is not functioning from greed, political strategy, or even concern over his own legacy.  Obama wants to end America.  His actions speak of no other intention and his background supports the theory.  The “fiscal cliff” is a chance for Obama to run America into a wall of debt, worthless money, and a morally corrupt people, all of which he has had his fingers in helping to create.  So don’t be surprised when things go badly, because they will.  Obama has nothing to lose and everything to gain from ending America.  He does not want a balance budget, he does not want peace.  He does not want American productivity.  At the end of his presidency, he’ll take his money and move to Hawaii, and curry favor in future United Nations initiatives.  By then, under progressive calculations, America will have lost its sovereignty, its superpower status, and its influence throughout the world.  Obama will be a global hero by removing America from the international scene paving the way for Socialist International to unite the world under communism once and for all.  Obama will be set for life, and the rest of us will wonder how we let it happen.  That is what the “fiscal cliff” is all about and what’s at stake.  This is also why Republicans should play hard ball and hang the price tag from the big ears of Obama and let him have responsibility for the recession that follows.  Trying to ease the pain in this case will actually end American sovereignty, so let Obama and his minions of evil hit the wall with the rest of us.

Elections have consequences, and this is what 51% of America voted for.  So let the idiots have it.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Teacher Kelsey Hartmann from Huber Heights: Having sex with kids to keep a market edge

I knew there was a reason I always liked Darryl Parks from 700 WLW.  On his first Saturday show of December 2012 he offered an excellent reason why Kelsy Hartmann from Huber Heights—was caught  having sex with one of her 16-year-old students in her husband’s car while pretending to do some last-minute shopping on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving.  According to Kelsey’s latest evaluation she was an excellent teacher, leaving Darryl to conclude that Kelsey was simply doing what many other teachers have been doing in the competitive field of public education, and that is to personally reach out to their students to give them something unique that all the evolving education tools are doing better, such as the modern computer.  One thing that a computer can’t do for young students is have intercourse with them to keep their interests so during these very difficult times when school budgets are shrinking, and work forces are being reduced teachers like Kelsey have determined to stay on top of their students–quite literally.  Maestros de escuelas públicas de amor tener sexo con hombres jóvenes y chupar sus penes!  No wonder so many parents support public education for their needy young sons.  And no wonder so many students take to the streets to tear down the signs of tax opposition when school levies are attempted.  The young boys of public education know they can’t get sex this easy anywhere else but in their classrooms, so they defend their sexually charged teachers with a fury.  Check out the pictures of Kesley at Darryl’s blog posting, and then listen to his Saturday broadcast below.

Read more: http://www.700wlw.com/pages/onair_parks.html#ixzz2DtP4w9z8

I think Darryl is right; Rosetta Stone software has changed the field of foreign language education.  In these modern times of 2012, it is rather easy to learn a foreign language should one wish to, completely invalidating the old archaic style performed in front of a classroom.  The two years of mandatory high school foreign language education is absolutely out of date—because the modern computer does a much better job than a traditional teacher.  So credit must be given to Kelsey and her barrage of other public school teachers and their labor unions all around Ohio who have tener mucho sexo con hombres jóvenes y tragar su semon en cantidades tales que los maestros beben su hombría por la taza con el café.  And we thought teachers were drinking coffee in the morning……………………..apparently not.

A computer can teach young students in high school better than just about any teacher in any course these days—math, science, history and especially foreign language. Since most people learn by visual stimulation, the computer is much better equipped to perform most of the modern education tasks with far superior results than the traditional teacher, and the computer is a lot cheaper on labor too.  But a computer will not steal the keys of her husband’s car and meet with students on the side of a road and have sex with them to keep their interest in public education like Kelsey and her other tri-state teachers will.  That is the one thing the computer cannot do better, and that is actually provide such “hands on” training.

So whenever a school levy is voted for, and support for public education is declared, think of the over the top and under the covers antics of many fine teachers like Kelsey Hartmann and how dedicated to their students they truly are—so much so that they are willing to stay on top of their students needs—literally.  Kelsey le encanta sentarse sobre el pene de sus alumnos en el asiento trasero de un coche.    Auuuuhhh…………….public education at its finest.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Death by Hyphen: Wisdom from Mark Etterling

A guest article from Mark Etterling.  For more about Mark, CLICK HERE

 

Throughout history many lands have fallen at the hands of foreign invaders.  Still many more have succumbed to financial ruin, natural disaster, and disease.  However, by far the single greatest cause for the demise of most nations has been the hyphen.  I realize this might sound a bit strange, but it’s true.  A simple little punctuation mark has caused far more chaos to mankind than any invading army could ever dream of.
 
We are told about how wonderful the concept of multiculturalism is because it allows everyone to be accepted for who they are.  It all sounds wonderful, at least on paper.  We are shown these magical fantasies of everyone from every walk of life getting along in a grand melting pot of tolerance.  However, reality paints a completely different picture from what the brochures of multiculturalism describe.  We are told that because we are all allowed to be different multiculturalism makes us great.  In reality what truly makes us great is when we are able to function as a nation united as one regardless of our differences.  What most people don’t understand is that there is a very profound difference between tolerating our differences and celebrating who we are versus living in a multicultural society.  It is the understanding of that difference that determines whether we are to be a true melting pot society, or one that destroys itself from within.
 
In our modern society we have become accustomed to the hyphen.  We see it every day in the descriptions that we use.  The modern lingo uses terms like African-American, Jewish-American, Hispanic-American, Middle-Class American, etc. when what we should really be using is the simple term American.  Societies should always seek to promote those things which unite instead of those things that divide.  Sure we all come from differing backgrounds, but what is ultimately of the greatest value is the glue that holds us together.  My best friend is an immigrant who came here from Ireland, but he’ll be the first to correct you if you call him an Irish-American.  He’ll tell you he is first and foremost an American.  He just happens to be of Irish descent.  He gets it.  Two of the greatest Americans to have ever lived, Abraham Lincoln and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. also got it.  It was Lincoln who stated that “A nation divided cannot stand”.  Dr. King’s message wasn’t for us to focus on dividing people by race, but to focus on all people as one regardless of race.
 
The problem with living in a hyphenated society is that there are an infinite number of possible criteria to divide us by.  How can we ever promote the idea of true equality when the very act of division is only useful for highlighting inequality?  In a hyphenated society there will always be those who are perceived as the “bully” class and those who are perceived as the “victim” class.  The roll of the victim is to demonize the bullies and seek preferential treatment as compensation for having been victimized. Unfortunately, we can’t all be allowed to play the victim roll.  This means that at some point every victim class will attempt their turn at jumping to the front of the line in order to secure their preferential status.  What we should be doing is seeking out the wisdom of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment whereby all people are viewed through a cultural blindfold to ensure equality.  Instead, it’s like watching shoppers at a Black Friday sale where everyone is attempting to push and elbow their way to the front of the line whereby the inevitable fight breaks out and chaos ensues.  This is why the net result of multiculturalism is ultimately civil war.
 
Patriotism is the antithesis of multiculturalism.  By definition patriotism promotes a singular national agenda above all others.  We can respect each others background, but only under the umbrella of first and foremost being a people united.  The brain trust of the Left fully understands this which is why they demonize the Right as being overzealous when it comes to patriotic themes.  It’s why they attempt to remove the Pledge of Allegiance and the flag at any opportunity.  The true sinister reason that the Left loves the concept of multiculturalism is because it gives them the opportunity to wield the hyphen as if it were a sword in order to divide and conquer.  You don’t have to take my word for it, just look at all the various ways they attempted to divide us in the last election.  They accused the Right of being racist, of declaring a war on women, of being anti-Hispanic, of being homophobic, of being anti-Islamic, and even of being puppets of the hated 1%.  That way they could go to each group and proclaim to be their protectors to prevent them from falling victim to such bullies.  In truth it was to exploit the use of the victim moniker to secure someone’s trust and thus their vote.
 
If you listen to the post election punditry the common theme is that Romney lost because he failed to address and embrace all of these different divides.  He didn’t address the issues of the Black community, or women’s issues, or Hispanic concerns. The problem is that he shouldn’t have had to.  The role of the President should be to address the issues that affect us all.  To do anything else would be to promote the very divides that are breaking us apart.  We have allowed ourselves to be sold into the self-serving ruse of multiculturalism by accepting our own hyphenated rolls instead of embracing the singular role as Americans.  Each demographic embraced their own description as victim instead of playing out their primary roll as Americans.  In doing so, we have allowed ourselves to move one step closer to the abyss.
 
Even recent history has not been kind to those who ignore the evils of the hyphen.  In Rwanda it was the Tutsi’s and Hutu’s who had attempted to coexist as separate tribal cultures instead of as a unified nation.  Ultimately they ended up massacring each other for it.  In places like Chechnya and Bosnia it has been a divide defined by religious differences that has brought about war.  In South Africa it was a divide of race that cost so many their lives.  In this country we are being pitted against each other in a multitude of ways in an all out divide and conquer strategy.  As I stated earlier and history proves, it is civil war that represents the ultimate climax of a multicultural society.  Therefore, we must do our best to heed the words of men like Lincoln and King.  Otherwise, the greatest nation the world has ever known will fall victim to the same fate as so many others before.  It will have been destroyed by a simple hyphen.
Mark Etterling

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Russia Says Obama is the Same as Lenin: Modern Progressive = Traditional Communist

It is no longer a secret of great urgency.  Communism is out in the open in America after 80 years of slow erosion and denials, communist infiltrators focusing on the American education system have overtaken logic in much the same way that Vladimir Lenin did in Russia during the Revolution of 1917.  Barack Obama in 2012 just newly re-elected by a society of fools is uttering exactly the same kind of rhetoric that Lenin did to usher in a communist take over of Russia a century ago.  Obama’s push for tax increases against the “rich” is exactly the same type of thing, and like all insecure academics Obama seeks a “consensus” of others to validate his communist theories.  This is why he brings in middle-class citizens to back him during White House speeches, to show that the “masses” are with him.  Lenin did the same kind of thing when advocating the creation of the Soviet Union.

I have shown at this site the detailed history of how all this happened, how labor unions are direct advocates of communism in America during the 1930’s especially and how they reside within Progressive politics.  I have shown what the McCarthy Hearings were all about and why they were important.  I have shown how KGB agents helped create the “hippie” movement in America during the 1960’s and are now within the “green” movement which is just the hippie movement renamed.  I have shown here how the Department of Education was created to bring about communism into every classroom and to protect the movement through bureaucracy in 1979, and the results are easy to see today for anyone with courage to look at the facts.  I have said these things because that is where the research leads when the investigation is conducted impartially.  America has been consumed by the enemy of The Cold War discreetly in a war that many Americans didn’t even know they were fighting, because they were playing checkers when the enemy was playing chess.  I have even went so far as to provide for you here dear reader the entire post-Thanksgiving Day show of my friend Doc Thompson as he filled in for the Glenn Beck Radio Program.  All three hours are below for you to listen to so that you can see that the evidence is not just being reported on these pages, but is moving into the mainstream where it belongs.  Now the Communist news group Pravda which was the official propaganda arm of the USSR during the Cold War has identified the Obama Presidency in the same way that I have.  Have a look at what they had to say about the communist movement in America, and specifically Obama.  Click the link below.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/russian-news-outlet-pravda-previously-the-official-press-of-the-ussr-labels-obama-a-communist-in-scathing-oped/

Since I began uttering these facts about communism embedding itself in public education many members of the media whom I have had very open relationships with previously have naturally sought to distance themselves from my opinion, because progressives have successfully suppressed any discussion of communism as an “out-dated” term left over from the “old days.”  This has been equivalent to the “cheating husband” who says to his wife, “I’m not sleeping with other women while on business trips,” all the while the husband has hundreds of text messages on his phone from women he is sleeping with, none of whom know of the others.  The husband thinks of himself as a slick character who can tell a lie with a straight face and he laughs at the chaos he creates in the lives of all his lovers.  So too does the communist proclaim that their “progressive” ideas are not part of the Cold War attack against America, which public education has conveniently erased from public scrutiny, but rather is focused on the well-being of all human beings.  The real goal is suppression and control of people everywhere with the sinister aims of communist rule intent on the destruction of individual endeavor and advocating collectivism.  SEE MY ARTICLE ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FOOTBALL AND SOCCER IN AMERICAN SPORTS.  The moves against America are subtle and very careful taking place outside of the attention spans of generations, over a long—and patient strategy that started with The Communist Manifesto.

Pravda understands all too well what is happening in America because it already happened in the former Soviet Union.  And they are not handcuffed by the American media into advocating progressive ideas, so they can report the facts as they see them, much the way I have.  The media people I know are uncomfortable with this truth because it requires them to admit that they have been a part of undermining America and that reality is tragically terrible to their minds.  But the facts are the facts—anyone who advocates progressive politics is advocating communist strategies against America.  Changing the names does not change the intention, which is the destruction of American capitalism, self-reliance, and a belief in small government independence.  The communists are alive and well today, and are functioning out in the open from the modern White House which is a disgrace to everything America stands for.

Anyone who takes an oath to defend the American Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic has an obligation to defeat the progressive communists who are seeking to undermine that same Constitution from insurgency within American politics.  Communists in America are domestic enemies and its time to deal with them as such.  They wish to destroy the American economy, the minds of the children, and put controls on every single human being on the planet.  And so far, they have been very successful, because the people of The United States have treated them with fairness, which has not been extended from the other side.  So no quarter should be given to these domestic enemies no matter where they reside, whether it be a local school board, a trustee, a congressional representative, a senator, a media personality, or even a member of The White House.  If they advocate progressive philosophy they are advocating the goals of communism and are domestic enemies to all who protect the Constitution.  History proves this and can best be seen in the novel We The Living.  It’s happened before and is happening again.  The evidence is clear.  All people need to do is accept the grim reality as fact, then act on that knowledge.  For more on this read my review of We The Living, written in 1936.  It looks like Joseph McCarthy was correct in his assertion of McCarthyism.  It was the battle over McCarthyism that allowed subversive elements to act in the open from our schools, from the media, and within government as the saboteurs succeeded in labeling McCarthy and his supporters as extreme radicals while many court cases protected communism under the same Constitution that the communists behind the mask of progressivism sought to destroy, eventually leading to a communist in the White House which progressives had been trying to achieve for over 100 years.  Now that they have The White House their first strategic target is the “rich” otherwise known as the bourgeoisie class.   That is the one and only goal of the tax hikes.  It has nothing to do with dealing with the deficit.  It’s all about a political checkmate in a chess game between communists and capitalists.

For more, I suggest reading We The Living.  It’s easy to get at your local book store.  And if you wish proof of what I said about the Department of Education CLICK HERE.  

Want proof of KGB spies starting the hippie movement CLICK HERE.

Read more about McCarthyism here:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

Want more proof?  CLICK HERE. 

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Obama in PEE PEE: Glenn Beck shows he’s not a ‘Coward’

Finally a media personality with testicular fortitude, and rightfully it is the author of the recent book COWARDS who illustrated wonderfully the progressive hypocrisy so evidently on display in American society.  Glenn Beck came under predictable fire when he dropped a bobble head representation of President Obama into a container full of metaphorical piss to exercise his First Amendment rights, and I applaud him for the stunt.  Obama is a symbol of progressive politics and it is time that progressives get back some of the antagonism that they have dished out for years.  See the stunt below.

Conservatives have been losing a public relations battle with progressives for decades because they have always taken the high ground, and such strategic positions are not enough when the enemies are soulless radicals hell-bent on American destruction.  So force must be met with force.  Rhetoric must be met with rhetoric.  I know well what Beck experienced and why he did what he did, as I have my own experience with such things.  CLICK HERE FOR A REVIEW.  Progressives do not like it when they are given back the kinds of harassment they conduct on a regular bases against American traditionalists who despise progressivism and they scream like babies when acts like Beck performed are shoved back in their faces.  Progressives have been doing such things for many years, and it is time to give them a dose of their own medicine.

It is also time to recognize that we are not in a peaceful exchange of differing opinions—we are at war—traditionalists against progressives and progressives were the ones who fired the first shots with their multiple desecrations of traditional American beliefs—everything from the harassment of housewives to “fight for equal progressive rights at the expense of their families” to literally defaming religious icons that founded The United States.  Progressives have done everything in their power to rip to shreds the firm and knowledgeable family father, the solitary cowboy, and the enterprising business tycoon with the bumbling Homer Simpsons on modern TV, the homosexual activist, and the altruist who sacrifices their lives for the sake of mankind.  The war is well documented, and is raging with a fury.  And it is finally wonderful to see a media personality who represents traditional American value with an old fashioned swagger that is needed worse than a drought laded country needs water across a harsh, scorched desert landscape.

Bravo Glenn Beck!  I’ll fight with you any day.   Sadly most everyone else are COWARDS.   Read more, CLICK HERE.

After all, will we let liberty go with politeness and a negligent whimper?  I’m not.  That’s why we have the first and second amendments—to defend liberty from domestic enemies like progressives.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com