Tag: drug cartels

Rand Paul Goes to Washington: Fighting back against the corrosive hive-like collective

So why the hoopla over Senator Rand Paul’s filibuster that recently took place during the first full week of March 2013?  Well the political clatter is over whether or not a President of The United States can assassinate American citizens on American soil at their discretion.  The controversial implication is the automated response—how could anyone conceive that an American president would ever act against the people who elected them?  The suggestion is a frightening one and most people are not prepared to deal with such a reality—yet that is exactly what the wording that the Justice Department has been attempting to preserve for President Obama with legal language that could easily be conjured up for some future political maneuver.  The alarm signs with the Obama administration and his Justice Department started years ago when they openly endorsed the voter harassment antics of the Black Panthers at polling places, then were caught in the terrible gun running scandal of Fast and Furious.  Then there was the tragedy of Benghazi which appears to be the result of the President’s military action against Libya without Congressional approval.  In spite of what the Obama administration has said about their peaceful intentions, and desire for justice, their actions display a hunger for power that is dangerous, which is why Rand Paul wants to make sure that the language of the law is defined in this moment of history for clarity, which is required given the level of deception that is common in politics.

It is sad that there are members of our American Republic who are so naive that they cannot see the mechanisms of evil that work behind the masses of collective rule.  Even though publicly there appears to be great differences behind the recently deceased Hugo Chavez who was the socialist dictator of Venezuela and President Obama, the big differences are in the checks and balances in The United States with the Constitutional power given to individual people and the House and Senate.   Idealistically Chavez and Obama might as well be identical twins, as Obama if left unchecked would undoubtedly run America in the same fashion that Chavez ran Venezuela—which appears to be Obama’s intention.  Progressives believe that if they don’t name an evil, that it doesn’t exist so they expect Obama’s actions to go un-noticed because the public façade is named to be conducted under the umbrella of goodness.

Yet real reporters like Bill O’Reilly are just now beginning to arrive at the dark place that many of us in the Tea Party movement have been declaring all along only to be shrugged off as conspiracy.  Is President Obama intentionally attempting to harm The United States through economic collapse?  I have stated that I believe Obama is doing just that and the evidence is stacking up in my favor.  But even mainstream reporters who might lean conservative, but attempt to be as fair as possible are starting to catch on that there is something really wrong with President Obama.  This led to one of the most explosive, and frustrated interviews that O’Reilly has had in many years when the liberal talk show host Alan Colmes attempted to defend Obama’s fiscal failures with the lure of conspiracy.

Colmes as a progressive knows that the way to diffuse a question he can’t answer is to attack the interrogative with wild accretions such as daring O’Reilly to say that Obama is deliberately attempting to harm Americans—which in the court of public perception would appear to be too extreme for believability.  Even though the facts point to such a reality, O’Reilly didn’t fall for it and turned the issue around on Colmes which became a violent exchange that I wish more conservatives would do.  When conservatives buckle under accusations of fascism, racism, or conspiracy theory, and dance around the issue without getting angry at the strategy they find themselves losing to the Alan Colmes type progressives nearly 100% of the time.  They end up like O’Reilly’s former back-up host John Kasich who is the current governor of Ohio as watered down versions of their former conservative selves.  Even when people like Kasich win in polling and elections, conservativism loses to the Progressive who is the architect of madness.  Colmes deserved what he got from O’Reilly and I would hope that more people would begin to defend themselves from the tyranny of the Progressive—because their work is sinister, deceitful, and disguised with smiling faces.  Their evil is well documented and can easily be seen in countries like Venezuela who operated without the checks and balances of a Republic like The United States.

In that context the actions of Rand Paul should be common place in the Senate and not the exception that it was.  America should function with the enthusiasm that was shown in the great old movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington where Jimmy Stewart filibustered the senate in a very similar fashion that Rand Paul did in his 13 hour standoff.tweedledee-tweedledum-3  Government is not supposed to be like a mound of insects serving a collective cause of unity, they are supposed to be a group of representatives who hash out their differences in verbal combat for the good of the country, and display that nobody is above the law—not even a President of The United States.  America does not have a king, or a dictator, so they are not able to make decisions without accountability to other representatives of the Republic having an input. The facts and behavior behind President Obama show that he has a willingness to act without respect to these checks and balances, and this should raise concern among every American.  Thankfully, Senator Rand Paul acted as a proper representative under tenuous conditions, and justice has been pursued in his filibuster to the benefit of all no matter what political persuasions may be.  Right is right, and Paul acted in accord with the pursuit of truth, and justice—and the American way, which is truly unique on the world stage and should be the model every country across the planet uses for their own government.  The spirit of that government is often confusing and mired in controversy, but the intention was captured so wonderfully in the film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, and the Rand Paul Filibuster.  The rest of the world should take notes.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Lakota Exploits more Children in Money Grab: The sinking “love boat” of public education

I didn’t think much of Joan Powell’s announcement that she would not seek reelection for her Lakota school board seat she has held for over 16 years until I saw her closing statements in the Lakota News Network’s newspaper—(The Pulse Journal).  In yet another softball interview from Hannah Poturalski, Powell stated about her fellow school board members “I don’t think anyone does this job for the recognition or the money, but certainly I know that this group of individuals, everybody’s heart is in doing this for the betterment of our community and the children of our community to make sure they have quality education.”  I don’t have any doubt that every one of Lakota’s school board members including Joan believes that mantra, but the reality of the situation is far more telling.  Read the actual Pulse Journal article at the link below.   (Also below are some 2010 examples of how Lakota used young people to advance a union labor cause contributing to the need for additional taxes.  Notice how The White House and Lakota Schools use the same tactic of manipulation on the backs of young children.  After the next three videos are more factual based videos that deal with the actual school funding problems.  Joan and her friends have openly participated in this behavior knowingly or unwittingly.)

http://www.pulsejournal.com/news/news/lakota-board-president-will-not-seek-re-election/nTyG7/

School board members are not pillars of the community.  The school in fact is only a small part of the community, not the centerpiece—as organized labor supported by long time school board members friendly to such socialist organizations have openly advocated.  School boards are only management teams no more important than an average management team of any company.  Their job is to manage their business, and in the case of the Lakota school board members, they have not done a very good job of that management because they are always asking for more money—which they plan to do in the fall of 2013 ahead of the LEA contract that is up in the summer of 2014.  If the school board under Joan’s leadership had done their job and not caved into the labor union so many times over her 16 year career Lakota might not have so many financial problems now.  Anyone in management knows that it’s easy to say “yes” to employees and give them anything they want, but most of the time managers are required to say “no,” and to draw a line in the sand to live within a budget.  At Lakota, the management team has routinely just given away money to their employees believing that it would shut them up, that it would buy them the best talent, and that they could cover their incompetency with the silly notion that they are “pillars of the community.”  For many years parents believed Joan and her fellow school board members like former levy campaign advocate Sandy Wheatley, and current school board member Julie Schaffer who also worked on the past levy campaigns, had exhausted all options when they ask for community tax increases.  But instead of management of resources, these fiscal managers simply copy the big labor bullet points of their employees and expect the community to buy into the cost increase without opposition.  These tax advocating big labor supporters are dead wrong in their version of what makes education work, and attempt to hide the reality not just from the community, but from themselves.  They attempt to paint their jobs as important beyond analysis because “children” are involved which covers the real crime of poor management.

http://westchesterbuzz.com/tag/school-board-meeting/

This is where I get angry with all these characters.  When they can’t explain the flaws in their philosophy, and have shown that they are not willing to look deeply into the problems of education—they instead perform the exact same maneuver that the Obama White House is doing whenever they find themselves on the wrong side of a philosophical debate—they use the innocence of children to attempt to shut down all debate of their actions.  In the case of Lakota, they are a government school, so they function with the same mentality as all government programs; they believe their service is the most important aspect of human life.  It doesn’t matter if it’s the EPA, the TSA, Police, Firefighters, the Postal Service, the BMV—they all behave like the youngest child in a family and scream for attention as though their self-importance made the world spin.  What makes all this nonsense unfathomable is when that self-importance seeks to justify itself with children—and that is what Lakota and every other public education institution does to justify their mismanagement.  The situation is compounded when school board members attempt to paint a 16 year investment of their life to a school board as the betterment of their community through children.  I believe people like Joan consider such things, at least superficially as factual.  But the reality is far from the truth.

After my experience with Lakota schools from 2004 to 2012 and going to many meetings on education and studying the funding situation—I believe the only fix for public schools is School Choice.  And before there can be real School Choice for a school like Lakota, the teachers union has to go away with the Workplace Freedom amendment or some version of it.  Only when teachers are given a choice of whether they wish to participate in an extortive labor union or not can choices in education be given to parents.  And only then can freedom and educational opportunity be given to children.  When school board members align themselves with labor unions like Joan has with the Lakota Education Association, as Sandy Wheatley has, and Julie Shaffer has and many others……..they support a lack of freedom of choice, of allowing Lakota to have a monopoly on the education process without competition determining the real winner and losers of the marketplace.  Watching these people perform in public is like watching the Harlem Globtrotters play against the Washington Generals.  You know the Globetrotters are going to win–their shows are just a lot of tricks and silly antics.  No competition against a stacked deck.

In another article in the West Chester Buzz Joan revealed again her view of the education situation when she said, “I have worked with four different superintendents. I can’t think of how many governors. Lakota has seen a lot of change and I hope Lakota can remain so successful because I really do believe that it holds a valuable place in this community.”  Without realizing it, Powell articulated her real motive for holding office with the school board.  What other position would allow her to be a supervisor over superintendents?  What other position would give her access to state governors?  What other position would place her in the middle of most community politics?  Would she have access to such people if she were only a real estate agent?  Of course not.  But under the umbrella of helping children, the hidden desire to rub shoulders with important people can be hidden from analysis.  It allows a gigantic illness to continue to ooze throughout society, and people like Joan and her 16 years of advancing the big labor position have only succeeded in limiting freedom of choice for families and the students of education with a phony regard for their well-being. If they really cared they wouldn’t attempt to cover up bad things that happen to kids by protecting the reputation of the institution over the individuality of the children.  I have many cases that prove that to be the case—some published here, some not.  CLICK HERE FOR A SAMPLE.

Or this one: CLICK HERE

Or perhaps this one: CLICK HERE

Or this one…………………I could go on and on and on………………..CLICK HERE

The same kind of illusion that is hidden behind motherly care was uttered by Lakota’s superintendent Mantia when she said about Joan’s years of service, “I have watched an incredible amount of time this board of education spends in what I would view as some of the most tumultuous educational times.  It’s deep conversations about children’s futures … and as we ponder the next phase of education for students in a very changing world, those conversations get much more difficult.”  Mantia and Powell along with the rest of the Lakota school board I have no doubt believed every word of that statement too.  But they do not look further to the merit of their statements.  What they are really concerned about is not children, but their vision of education and the direction it is going—which is School Choice.  What resides behind the superficial concerns for children’s well-being is a concern for the preservation of their understanding of education—of the philosophy they have committed their lives to.  If public schools really cared about kids they wouldn’t try to pound out their individuality into socialist goo of brainless consumerism.  Public schools and their agents have destroyed the lives of far more children than they’ve ever helped.  The proof is all around us—and those products are the result of many Joan Powell’s and their multiple years of service on a school boards supporting all the wrong ideas and building the strength of a community on the unstable backs of organized labor driven public education.

The reality of the situation is one thing, and I feel the way I do about it.  People are free to choose whether or not they wish to support such social positions.  But children cannot choose, and they are always the ones who are exploited by the weak arguments of professional educators who cannot otherwise justify their internal psychosis.  That is when the line is crossed.  I wish Joan well in her future endeavors if she is in fact truly leaving the Lakota school board—and this is not just a stunt prior to the announcement of their 2013 levy.  But bringing the community and children into the argument is crossing the line.  Her job as a school board member will not be missed by children or the community.

Life will tick on with or without her and behind her words is the real fear that her 16 years meant nothing for the greater good, instead of being of paramount importance.  That is the real meaning behind such statements that are hidden behind the defenseless children who naively advocate so much social evil.  The evil is in lack of choice and the tyranny of monopoly as advanced by public education institutions everywhere of which Joan and her fellow school board members are simply minor players.  The system they serve is headed for a major revolution.  It won’t happen over night, but over the next decade.  It will happen slowly and will benefit children and their families immensely.  And before it’s done, there will be many more resignations from those who see the writing on the wall, and want to jump off the sinking ship while it still floats.

For my position, I am happy to see public education sink, because what the ship carried was a way of looking at the world that has caused great harm to our civilization and it deserves to be on the bottom of the deepest oceans in the cold dark abyss where such an evil can no longer hurt children by using them to fuel the luxury the ship affronted on behalf of the ship’s crew who enjoyed much luxury on the “love boat” called public education.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

The Winds of Revolution: Executive orders signed on the backs of exploited children

I have established the parameters of America’s next Civil War in my 2004 novel, The Symposium of Justice.  I then defined the who, what, why, when and where for rebellion to occur in my 2012 novel Tail of the Dragon.  Before the scam artists in government attempt to portray my future actions as radical, dangerous, or as an enemy of the state, those two literary works are my testimony of innocence against a court system built by insanity.  A government that allows $16 trillion dollars of debt to go unchecked and signs 23 executive orders against the 2nd Amendment is a criminal syndicate no different from Al Capone’s organized crime actions—and I consider them all domestic enemies.  Click the link below for more detail.   After all, Saul Alinsky learned from Al Capone, and it was Saul who taught most in modern government how to conduct their business of arm twisting and extortion against individual liberty.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/16/obama-presents-new-gun-control-measures-live-updates/

To learn more about Saul Alinsky, click this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky

When I speak about the need for a Civil War it is not because I want it, but because bad people are attempting to impose themselves upon my life, and those of the people who are not so vocal about their desire for liberty.  I know all too well that many lawyers, judges, and politicians do not believe in the Bible they swore their oaths to, or respect the Constitution they pledge to protect.  They are simply scavengers who seek to pillage the lives of individuals of everything they own or desire to possess.  I have seen first hand many instances where America’s entire court system is about nothing but generating money for the participants at the expenses of the victims.  I gave such an example in Tail of the Dragon, which is based on first hand experience.  The court system is only about making money through the clerk of courts for the judges, the lawyers, the bailiffs, the jails, the insurance companies, the legal professors, the mind numb politicians, and nothing else.  They seek targets that have broken the law as defined by those same people who have no respect for the American Constitution but serve only the case-law of fellow attorneys.  The legal system in America is a racket no different from the organized crime syndicates that formed during the Prohibition Period.

When Jon Hammer was thrown into a Mexican jail for trying to register a rifle at the border, the Mexicans were not interested in justice, or fairness.  They were only interested in jailing the young man and attempting to extort money from the ex-Marine’s family.  The Mexicans behaved no different from a band of pirates who took over the lives of the innocent and threatened to kill them on behalf of their personal profit.  The court system is corrupt beyond repair in Mexico.  Nobody cared about the life of Jon Hammer.  The President of Mexico allowed the behavior to continue on once the story became public for over 4 months.  The criminal underground runs Mexico, and the Jon Hammer case proves it.  Both The United States and Mexico showed the world that neither side cared about Jon Hammer or his family—especially when the situation was so obviously unjust.  Instead all the parties involved on both sides walked over the issue as though they were egg shells, not daring to step too hard in any one place so not to upset their supplies of money that funnel to them through organized crime.

What’s worse about the whole ordeal is that Mexico appears to be more honest than America.  At least the Mexicans don’t attempt to hide their tyrannical intentions behind children or tapestries of “justice” like American courts have attempted to do.  President Obama attempted to hide his power grabbing actions of executive orders behind the naive innocence of children, and nobody questioned the obvious evil of the act.  Both courts in Mexico and America are corrupt and rotting with scallywags intent to profit off the unfortunate misery of the guiltless.  When things go bad in the near future it will be those types of scallywags who attempt to call me “the criminal,” which of course I am not, or won’t be.  There comes a time when it is right and honorable to fight back against evil that attempts to hide theft behind righteousness, and that time is coming quick.

We are living in an upside down world, the bad pretend that they are good, and the good are made out to look bad, so a war between those two ideas is immanent.  In the context of a normal life, the talk of war might seem extreme, but it is in the desire for peace that the pirates of government loot us all in broad day light with further encroachments’, and out-right injustices are advanced through sheer greed.  It is against those feeble minds that we will protect ourselves and in that context, is the reason for the next war that is about to break out.  It will also be in the context of the villainy conducted among America’s failing political system and its corrupt courts that the actions of liberty will forever be measured.  The sanity of the Constitutional defenders is written down forever and cannot be changed by the looters of social order, who hide their malicious actions behind “safety,” “security,” and “children.”  The truth is easy for everyone to see and that truth might waver for a bit when the first shots are fired and real lives find themselves at the cashiers counter–but context will find its place which is the reason for these millions of words.  It cannot be said that we did not try a solution of peace.  When the lives stack up, nobody can say that we did not try.

Because we did………….(past tense.)  Corruption advanced anyway with executive orders and a court system that lacks the will for justice, thus the title—The Symposium of Justice.

As to the source behind Obama’s new gun control laws created by executive order………………..it is all about making more money for an ever-expanding–all-encompassing government.

Among the new spending the president proposed:

• $4 billion for the president’s proposal “to help keep 15,000 cops on the streets in cities and towns across the country.” (That is roughly $266,000 per police officer.)

• $20 million to “give states stronger incentives to make [relevant] data available [for background checks] … “$50 million for this purpose in FY2014”

• “$14 million to help train 14,000 more police officers and other public and private personnel to respond to active shooter situations.”

• “$10 million for the Centers for Disease Control to conduct further research, including investigating the relationship between video games, media images, and violence.”

• $20 million to expand the National Violent Death Reporting System.

• $150 million to “put up to 1,000 new school resource officers and school counselors on the job.”

• “$30 million of one-time grants to states to help their school districts develop and implement emergency management plans.”

• $50 million to help 8,000 schools “create safer and more nurturing school climates.”

• $15 million to “provide ‘Mental Health First Aid’ training for teachers.”

• $40 million for school districts to “work with law enforcement, mental health agencies, and other local organizations to assure students with mental health issues or other behavioral issues are referred to the services they need.”

• $25 million for state-based strategies that support “young people ages 16 to 25 with mental health or substance abuse issues.”

• $25 million to “offer students mental health services for trauma or anxiety, conflict resolution programs, and other school-based violence prevention strategies.”

• $50 million to “train social workers, counselors, psychologists, and other mental health professionals.”

Click here to visit the source article at Buckey Firearms.org.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Who’s Responsible for the “Fiscal Cliff”: Most likely, you are

As the nation prepares to plunge over the “fiscal cliff” of 2013 with $16.3 trillion dollars in debt, and the promise of increased taxes on every American tax payer—not the moochers—the roughly 50% who do not pay taxes, but the actual tax payers who have their incomes taxed because they are productive; the finger-pointing begins as to who is at fault.  Well dear reader, I will tell you who is at fault—and I’m happy to proclaim it as I have made my own internal arrangements to legally avoid my tax hikes.  I will not stand for being robbed by the idiots who caused this mess.  I will not work harder to slave for the bad decisions of the people who are at fault for the “fiscal cliff.”  America is not a “good for one, good for all” kind of place.  I am not “connected” to the fools of bad thought, and do not feel compelled to help those who are listed below with the mismanagement of their individual lives which has caused the current crises.

 

The people, who are at fault for the “fiscal cliff”— not necessarily in the order of importance, are those who are willing to pay for their food at McDonald’s with a credit card.  It is the congressman who would rather play golf with the president, than to do the job he was elected for.  It’s the President of the United States who believes more in socialism than capitalism.  It’s the woman who puts her career in front of her family leaving the children emotionally bankrupt.  It’s the father who would rather watch Monday Night Football at Hooters with his friends than to sit at a dinner table with his family.  It’s the woman who is on her third husband in a decade, and on the man who just left his wife of twenty years for a 23-year-old girl younger than his own daughters.  It’s the idiots who would rather spend their Friday evenings getting drunk than reading a book.  It’s the welfare mother who just gave birth to her fourth child in 6 years by all different men so she can qualify for more government assistance.  It’s the over-weight fool who has spent 35 years overeating to the point they can barely get up off a couch then expect someone else to cover their medical expenses as they are perpetually sick.  It’s the teacher who lies to themselves that they are in the teaching profession to care for children when in reality it’s really for the money and the shopping sprees it affords them.  It’s the lobbyist who would sell their country up the river in a heartbeat for a lap dance at Archibald’s on K-Street while their wives brag to their friends about what “great guys” their powerful—well connected husbands are.  It’s the woman who turns a blind eye to her husband’s indiscretions in trade for diamond ear-rings on Christmas.  It’s the woman who would rather work a job so she can get away from the pressure of being a mother then blame her child’s failures on a public school.  It’s the man who sent his son to college on an athletic scholarship so that the boy can have a shot at professional athletics.  It’s the gamblers who are still at the slot machines at a casino at 3:30 in the morning spending the last of their weekly paycheck waiting for the buffet to open for breakfast which they charge on a credit card because they’ve lost all their money.  It’s the news reporter who slanted their stories to fill an ideology they inherited during journalism school; instead of using what their critical mind tells them is right.  In short, the people most corrosive, most destructive, most diabolical and the most responsible for the “fiscal cliff” are those who blindly serve an institutional system in some fashion or another, and have strayed from individual responsibility.  They are commanded by their social weaknesses instead of commanding their daily lives.

 

There are of course many more types of people who are responsible for the “fiscal cliff” and the moral bankruptcy that America is now in.  But the above description paints the picture effectively.  My view of those types is that they created their own problems, and it is not my responsibility to save them from their own stupidity with extra tax money—which is what additional taxes are really going to fund—more of the above behavior.  The problem is, until the above issues are addressed, America will always have a debt problem because the root of the problem is greater than money.  It is a rot of the human soul that the fools above seek to fill with material possession which skews all the raw data needed to solve the actual “fiscal cliff.”  I realize that the best way to teach America the hard lesson it needs to straighten out the behavior above is to let them fall off the cliff, and to plummet to a painful crash.  Only then might they listen the next time we come near a “cliff” of any kind.  Maybe then they’ll listen when people of logic and reason tell them to be careful with their lives and treat every aspect of living as a precious moment worthy of great care.  Because the debts of our society are a lot of little things that add up to trillions of dollars and the people who created that debt do not deserve to be a part of “the land of the free, and the home of the brave.”  Such disreputable characters are not worthy of the honor to call themselves Americans when all they have done to contribute to the nation is debt.

 

Don’t ask me to pay for their bad behavior—because I won’t do it.  I realize that I just insulted most of the people reading this—but tough.  A thousand fools does not trump the brilliance of a creative individual who lives on the side of goodness.  Such is a problem of democracy and the demise of fools who seek to cover their folly by the good deeds of the few by force of the federal government and the armies of the destitute employed by their tyranny. 

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

The Sandy Hook Conspiracy: Hypocrisy on the Political Left and the “fish food” that fuels it

(I would advise that all these videos be watched carefully after the text is read.  Spend some time with this article, and share it with a friend.)

I truly feel sorry for people who are missing the ability to recognize treachery.  I feel sorry for the people who can’t believe that Hillary Clinton’s “concussion” is an old lawyer trick designed to scout out the prosecutor’s position on the Benghazi hearings.  By throwing underlings into the fire to witness the arguments position guilty parties can learn how to make their case.  Hillary is trying to delay her testimony till January while taking the brunt out of the hearings by unleashing her incompetency slowly, allowing her to manage the public opinion presentation more adequately.  Do I think she faked her injury—I absolutely 100% do.  Can I prove it? Of course not, and she knows it.  She is like so many employees who desire to have a day off work; they get a doctor note to say they are in a state of disrepair, giving them an alibi.  But anyone who deals with these issues knows that doctors have no problem writing such notes for their patients so long as they collect their fee.  So only Hillary knows for sure what she is up to.  Experience tells me she is faking it.

Experience also tells me that the Sandy Hook shooting is a false flag, which is very sad.  When I have told people these things, they first say—“do you actually think that our government would kill children to pass gun control legislation?  Do you really think that the government can control people’s minds making them do things?  Do you really think people can be so evil?  The answer is—YES, I do believe those things, based on my experience.  The shooters of both the Sandy Hook shooting and the Aurora shooting have dramatic things in common, both were young, both were intelligent—honor students—and both were very well prepared for investigators to go through their computers and destroyed the evidence of their plans.  The Aurora shooter had booby-trapped his apartment.  Investigators had to set off the traps to enter his apartment which destroyed a lot of evidence.  And the Sandy Hook shooter even thought to destroy his computer hard drive before he went on his shooting rampage.  Doesn’t that seem awfully………..sane?  I mean a guy wants to commit suicide and go out in what he thinks is a “blaze of glory” but he destroys his hard drive to protect whom–or what? These stories have been lost to the emotion of the poor children that were killed and the teachers who died at the school during that shooting rampage.

It appears that the father of the Sandy Hook shooter Peter Lanza was set to testify before the Senate with Robert Holmes, the father of the Aurora shooter in the ongoing LIBOR scandal.  The London Interbank Offered Rate, known as Libor, is the average interest rate at which banks can borrow from each other. 16 international banks have been implicated in this ongoing scandal, accused of rigging contracts worth trillions of dollars. HSBC has already been fined $1.9 billion and three of their low-level traders arrested.  It is very ironic that the fathers of both mass murder shooters are involved in the Senate investigation.  Read more here:

http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2012/12/2-mass-shootings-connected-to-libor-2447738.html

In the wake of these shootings, of course the gun grabbers were already poised to attack America’s Second Amendment, which has been the target of global power grabbers for a long time as indicated by the recent United Nations small arms treaty designed to disarm all countries.  These foreign interests know that it will take a lot of manipulation to remove guns from America, so they are on a public relations campaign to do so, and they do not care if they kill kids to achieve it.  More on that in a bit.  None of these claims are a conspiracy; these are all facts that can easily be looked up.  So the very next thing that people say when given these facts are how could these shooters be manipulated to perform such a terrible task?  Well the answer is that the James Holmes case is revealing many terrible manipulations that have not been reported.  Here are just a few.

In stunning accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the claimant as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to testify as a fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being arrested for prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the purposes of garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes. But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.  Read more about this story at the link below:

http://www.examiner.com/article/aurora-theater-shooting-court-documents-blows-inside-job-conspiracy-wide-open

Back in 1973 the CIA had to give up on their mind control experiments which seem to have been renamed under new programs and departments which are still at work today under much better technology.  Using microwaves broadcast from radio towers all over the nation there has been success in controlling the behavior of people by sending radio waves directly to the human brain.  Of course this affects different people in various ways.  This condition is so rampant that I featured a fictionalized version of this government strategy in my 2004 book The Symposium of Justice.  In my book it is called the Veil of Knowledge.  But as discussed on a recent episode of Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Venture, the Governor and his team investigated the infamous Brain Invaders project, shown above.  Watch it for yourself.  In the decades since WWII, thousands of Americans have come forward, claiming the government has been experimenting with mind control and brainwashing techniques, and they appear to have been very successful.  It is not a stretch to consider that such manipulative microwaves directed in a general population center might create in the mind of the average person feelings of anxiety and stress.  But in the mind of people like the Aurora and Sandy Hook shooters who are of above average intelligence, possibly heavily medicated by prescription medicine that allows the brain to become more prone to such mind manipulation devices, the thin line between thinking about evil and committing evil can easily be crossed—and it appears to have been to the strategic aims of very sinister global interest.

I consider the ability to comprehend such options to be the result of a superior intellect.  It is not easy to develop the creative ability to see how all these dots connect.  Most thinkers are limited by their narrow frames of mind and specialized training to only see their lives in the context of daily experience.  I feel sorry for these people who cannot understand how deeply sinister human beings truly can be, and to what extinct they are drunk for power.  The most obvious hypocrisy for these political thieves would be in the example that President Obama used in his recent speech declaring that the poor children who were killed in the Sandy Hook massacre had their lives robbed from them prematurely stealing the opportunity to raise families of their own and live happy lives.  Obama as a Democrat built his entire presidential campaign on being pro-abortion, being pro baby killers.  Obama used the deaths of the Sandy Hook children for political gain out of convenience and as a push to advance gun control.  Yet many of those children killed in Sandy Hook are only 6 to 7 years older than the many thousands of babies that are killed each year through abortion.  Democrats and progressives do not have a problem killing babies in a mother’s womb, so why do they care so much when the children are killed in a classroom?  Because they can exploit the tragedy for political capital—the hypocrisy is obvious.  Most people never connect such thoughts and it is on the backs of those poor souls that much evil is advanced by their own ignorance.  The forces that are at play in their lives are beyond their simple minds, and evil knows it.  It uses them to spread death and destruction to every corner of every community in every nation and in America it is the Constitution that stands between evil and goodness—and little else.  And evil is attacking that Constitution directly, yet subtlety.

Just because simple minds cannot grapple with such evil designs does not mean they are not real.  But a mind cannot drown in conspiracy theory either.  All that needs to be acknowledged is that Hillary has a high motivation for not appearing in the Benghazi hearings to protect her own political legacy on the backs of many dead Americans that are her fault directly.  Like her husband, she has shown in the past that she will stop at nothing to preserve herself.  And throughout the world, there are many who see America as their threat to global control.  They seek to use emotional events to destroy the nation by undermining its philosophy of self-reliance, and they do have the tools to perform the task—and those tools are being used.  Sandy Hook is just the most recent and the evil committed there goes far beyond a disturbed young person who played too many video games and was angry at his mother.   Of course there is more to it, but the simple minds of the masses lack the heart to look at such evil directly—because they fear what they might see if they open their eyes.

It is easier for these simple minds to trust the words of Obama, of Clinton, of Congress, the Senate, of law enforcement, of their teachers, their “rulers” than to take responsibility for their own lives and think for themselves.  It is easier to surrender their logic to the power-grabbers who will do anything to preserve their positions in the political class, and the strings that are tied to unelected officials who do not care who they destroy, or what they destroy, so long as they can implement their personal strategies.  It is those types of conditions that is the real story behind the Sandy Hook shooting, and those same forces are behind the deaths in Benghazi.  They are connected behind the stage where the stage play we think we are watching is actually being written by minds that reside in the shadows.  The Second Amendment in America is not to shoot deer for hunting, or even to protect ourselves from petty thieves who might rob our homes.  It is to defend ourselves from the kind of people who hide behind the stage and might desire to use our own military against us all—which is why they are seeking to disarm America so that we are defenseless against their diabolical plans.

Evil is very real, and the Second Amendment is dedicated to stopping it.  Evil will not go away if guns are removed from society.  Instead, evil will grow without regulation or fear of resistance.  That is why the deaths of kids are justified by the same minds who claim to support “social justice.”  The focus is not on the deaths of individuals, but on the “greater good”—the collective.  I feel terribly sorry for the people who have lost their lives in these terrible tragedies, Aurora, Benghazi, Sandy Hook and many more that never even get reported.  But I feel even more sorry for the ignorant simpletons who deny that evil is at work beyond the boundaries of their accepted reality.  It is they and their un-complex thinking that act like fish food in an aquarium that evil feeds upon to grow into a menacing entity that is hell-bent to destroy everything in its path with a mindless hunger that can never be quenched.  Denying that the fish exist does not lengthen the life of the food once it is plopped into the water—and America has been dropped into the water.  Below our feet in the depths of the abyss they linger……………and they are hungry.  (Don’t click the video below if you have a weak stomach.  But if you want to understand the kind of raw ruthlessness that is driving events behind the scenes in our society–then watch the white fish carefully.)

Click here to see how the fish food thinks:

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/5_craziest_right_wing_responses_to_sandy_hook/

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Public Education is more Dangerous than Guns: Why the Sandy Hook Shooting makes people anguish

I was a bit baffled by the panic that the collective nation felt in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut.  I understand the sadness, but to hear news personalities and politicians so distraught—to see the nation turning on their televisions after work and mashing their faces against the screens wanting to learn more information goes several steps beyond simple grief.  There was a fear invoked by the events of December 14th, 2012 where a 20-year-old shooter walked into a school and gunned down over twenty people, mostly kids, before taking his own life, that exceeds rationality and the reason is not what anyone is willing to discuss.

My thoughts about public education have evolved over the last couple of years from something that I previously tolerated as a local nuisance to a national menace of the American psyche.   I have learned through my school levy fights that most parents don’t care one iota what their kids are learning in school, or what damage to their social futures that government schools might do to their children over 13 years of elementary school and high school education.  Parents simply view public education as a babysitting service while they conduct their busy lives climbing a career ladder hoping that instead of love for their children they can purchase respect with the incomes they’ve earned from their occupations.  Some parents do get involved in their children’s education, particularly in sports.  However, many of these parents deep down inside hope their children’s participation in extracurricular activities will save money through scholarship earnings when it comes time to pay for college tuition leaving some of the savings that parents toiled over for years free for a nice vacation.  The sports participation is not one of love for the child as much as it is hope that their child will land a cherished scholarship.  It is rare to see parents in modern America taking an active role in their children’s education because they figure that is the job of the school—and in the back of their minds, the parents reserve the right to blame the school and the teachers for their failures as parents when things go wrong later.  That is the essence of modern public education in government schools.  The labor unions are happy to exploit this trend to their advantage, and they have.  Politicians are happy to exploit the guilt parents feel over their lack of involvement to enrich themselves as social looters.  But the real victims have always been the kids who just want parents to love them, teach them, and launch them into a life of their own with some measure of confidence—which they often find completely void.

So I did not feel stunned as others might have when hearing about the Sandy Hook shooting.  In fact, due to the social conditions involved on all sides, I am surprised that it doesn’t happen more often.  The failure is truly in social collectivism, where parents, kids, and politicians have embedded themselves into each other’s lives like mashed potatoes on a Thanksgiving Day dinner to be consumed by modern society and defecated out as waste products of a life dedicated to serving the collective whole.   When it comes to gun violence and the most vulnerable places that they are occurring with the most emotional impact, it is in school settings that they are most rampant.  This latest rampage, coming less than two weeks before Christmas, was the nation’s second-deadliest school shooting, exceeded only by the Virginia Tech massacre that claimed 33 lives in 2007.  Before that it was the Columbine shooting that was so glorified by the communist leaning Michael Moore film Bowling for Columbine.

The logical conclusion that one could make if they thought clearly on the matter is that if parents wanted their children to be truly safe, and to get a proper education that they would home-school their children instead of sending them to a public school full of unarmed progressive advocates where the children are vulnerable to the collective whims of society.  It is in such whims that distorted minds like Adam Lanza can make victims of unarmed children and naive human beings who prefer the peace sign over the barrel of a gun with a continued belief that evil can be legislated out of Earth’s social fabric.   People who think in such ways are the real danger to children because they are functioning from a false philosophy that is not driven by logic, but by their own internal selfishness.  They do not wish to take the time to raise their  own children properly so they send them to public school hoping the government can do it for them—but in so doing, their children are vulnerable to progressive politics, global power grabs, collective identity, and the barbarous malcontents of mental erosion.

My wife and I never left our kids to the fate of public education.  My wife was always a stay-at-home mom who drove my kids to school every day and helped them with their homework every night.  She also home-schooled them when the school wanted to teach my kids things we didn’t think they should be learning in the fourth grade—such as sex education.  Most of what my kids learned they learned with the input of my wife and me spending time with them and taking an active role in their lives which still exists to this day.  Many of my kid’s friends they went to school with who had parents who did not take an active role in their child’s lives, are rudderless despots drowning in the oceans of daily living, and that fate was sealed by their parents who used public education to do the job of parenting.   We have watched the decline first hand over the last decade and the differences are incredibly obvious.

It is dangerous to place children in large groups unarmed in a school room that only has one door in or out and is guarded by pacifist progressive leaning teachers radicalized by national teachers unions.  The policies of progressivism are failing in modern life, and there will be more incidents like the Sandy Hook Elementary school massacre.  There will be more because all the sorrow in the world can’t remove evil from the planet.  Evil cannot be controlled by more rules and regulation.  It cannot be quelled by guidance councilors or even more tax money.    Success in every American child requires a parent or mentor who will take direct responsibility for a child with real love and understanding that is rooted in individual responsibility.  The collectivism that is taught in modern society will produce many more troubled youth like Adam Lanza and leave millions of children perpetually vulnerable in classrooms all over the country because parents use public education as an extension of day care leaving complacent employees to safe guard the lives of Americas children—which is a recipe for disaster.

If parents really wanted their kids to be safe, they would withdrawal them from public school, teach them at home on a computer with online education within the safety and sanctity of private property guarded by American sovereignty, and one of the spouses would quit their full-time job and become a full-time parent because that’s what it takes.  The fear that society felt on the day of the dreadful Sandy Hook Massacre was not because of the victims—it was the realization that a system that most everyone has accepted as “good” is actually a very vulnerable environment that is well out of the control of the parents.   That vulnerability has been glazed over while busy parents pursue their individual careers, but the knowledge that a crazed lunatic can walk into any public school known to be full of unarmed—naive human beings is a lucrative target for the mentally anguished like Adam Lanza.  The fear that people felt upon hearing the news is that what they believed to be safe is quite the opposite, and if they want to keep their kids out of the grips of deaths embrace, or the many social pressures that lead to small losses of innocence, that the parents will have to take more active roles in their family’s lives.  And if I were them, I would take my children out of public school and do the job myself—so that I could ensure safety and success.  The grief that people are feeling is not for the unfortunate victims and their families, it is the realization that the responsibility for children cannot be pawned off on a group collective, but are the sole enterprises of a parent and their children, and is best protected with a personal firearm, a solid peace-loving religion, and a thirst for learning that is as free of social degradation as possible.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Progressives are at Fault for Most Gun Violence: Why the 2nd Amendment is “REALLY” needed

I have heard enough about the gun argument that took place after the Jovan Belcher shooting/suicide which occurred at Arrowhead Stadium, in Kansas on Saturday December 1st.  Belcher for all the reasons that impassioned youth build up a fury in their minds saw no way out for himself but suicide after he shot his girlfriend—the mother of his young baby during an argument.  Many people have had such arguments with a loved one, and many times the rage can build up to a desire to obliterate the other person, even if deep down inside the love is great.  The mind often distorts reality when perspective is misplaced, and people often do stupid things when they are angry.  But as I’ve listened all week to the pundits fume for more gun laws, like what the big cities have around America—which are also Obama Zone voting blocs, the reality of the situation must be placed into perspective and not be allowed to migrate to the progressive arguments of rhetoric not based on reality.

The strongest case that progressive minded gun grabbing fools have for more gun laws is that the urban population is killing each other ruthlessly, and putting guns in the hands of such people is dangerous.   Jovan Belcher is a product of this ruthless urban culture that is so highly praised among the media—and it is the creation of this dependent based urban culture that is the cause of many of society’s modern troubles—including gun violence.  Progressives seeking to hide the crimes of their folly are pursuing fewer guns in society to cover up their political failures as a general philosophy.  Much of that urban culture progressive creation can be heard in modern rap music which many young people like Belcher listen to often.  The music is often violent, and contains a lot of race based anger, meant to fuel support of progressive philosophy, such as more welfare programs, an expanded and defined middle class, a destruction of American traditional value in favor of more global awareness with less individual sovereignty—along with a host of other platform points all of which can be seen in the Obama Administration.  When pictures of Jovan Belcher are sought online, he is often seen wearing headphones which is common among athletes before a game starts—and I would be willing to bet that the music he was listening to was not Mozart, or Bach.  If a young person puts garbage into their minds, of course garbage will come out in their behavior, so when young people like Jovan find themselves angry and insecure over being a new parent with a young baby that is depending on them to be a good person, and the spouse in a relationship has a whole set of values that are different from Jovan’s upbringing, conflicts are bound to happen, and Jovan dealt with the crises in the manner that he built the ideas in his head with like music, movies, television, and most likely large doses of meditating on the merits of “urban culture.”  To understand that culture all one needs to do is play the video game Grand Theft Auto.  I’m sure Jovan Belcher played that video game a lot.  In fact—I’d bet on it.

(YES THE VIDEO BELOW IS THE REAL GAME AS KIDS PLAY IT EVERY DAY.)

But that doesn’t mean that guns should be outlawed because Belcher used a gun to commit crime, or video games because they allowed Belcher to fantasize about being a street thug—shooting and raping “bitches” so you can score points in a game like players do in GTA.  It doesn’t even mean that music should be edited in any manner.  If people like the urban stuff, the market has a right to exploit that consumer need.  But who created that market need—where does it come from?  Progressives—they are the ones who made the welfare culture, they are the ones who created the modern ghetto, they are the ones who are responsible for much of the gang violence that goes on, the drug use, the sex driven diseases like AIDS, the out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and progressives are responsible for destroying the modern family leaving many young people like Jovan Belcher without a good role model in their lives in the form of a father.  Progressives have attacked the America father of tradition and attempted to replace them with a central government, and that is the cause of most social failures. The gun violence is just the symptom of the sickness created by progressives in urban neighborhoods, which nobody in their right minds would want to live in.

Where I live I would say that 90% of the homes within a mile of my home are armed with at least two guns and I can report that we do not shoot each other—ever.  The guns are there for target shooting, for personal protection, and on occasion hunting.  But there is an even more important reason for having those guns—they are there in case the military fails us, and the government moves too far to the left for our liking, we will need to use those guns to take back our country from a military that we have wasted a lot of money arming and training only to be used against us as a weapon.

One year ago President Obama with the support of the House and Senate passed the NDAA Act which gives permission to whoever is president at the time to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans violating their 5th Amendment rights on only the suspicion of terrorist activity by the president as defined by that same Executive Brach holder.  I can say that if such a thing happens, I will no longer recognize the laws created by the thieves in Washington and an armed revolution will become necessary to overthrow the tyrannical government.  That’s why we have guns, because government cannot be trusted except when the threat of armed revolt is present.  If the government goes bad, the armies, and militias that are talked about in the Constitution become the weapons of that government leaving Americans defenseless.

In case political pussies like Bob Costas and the other progressive cry babies in the modern media didn’t notice, most of America did not vote for Barack Obama, by land mass.  It is the urban vote that did–the costal regions and cities with huge sections of Section 8 housing and strong labor union presences.  America as a whole is not in agreement with the idiots of New York and their progressive gun bans because deep down inside of everyone I talk to from all walks of life there is a strong belief that our guns will be needed to preserve our independence from progressives such as The United Nations and other members of Socialist International.  The U.N. is making their global land grab using the same progressive philosophies that helped shape the mind of Jovan Belcher.  It’s just a paper conquest as opposed to a traditional siege.  (And for my older readers here, sorry for my use of strong language, but it’s needed in this case.  There is more coming at the end, just to warn you)  The characters who want to grab our guns today are the same type of people we will have to fight tomorrow, and to surrender our defense against their parasitic aims would be a fool’s paradise.

Every idiot who called out for more gun control in the wake of this most recent tragedy is one of the types of progressive minded people who helped shape the mind of Jovan Belcher in the first place.  If Belcher did things in his life my way, he would learn to hunt and fish on his own, he’d know how to fix his own things in life both mechanically and psychologically, and he’d be listening to classical music on his iPod instead of urban rap, and he would have paid attention.  Young people love leadership, they soak it up like a sponge, and it says a lot that Belcher went to see his coach in the darkest hour of his life—probably because that was the strongest male figure in his life at the time.  Most of the urban crimes in society could be solved if the world had more strong fathers for young people to look up to, because the progressive experiment of destroying fathers is what caused Belcher and many other troubled youth to not have the mental faculties to deal with crises in their lives.  The fault is progressives and their urban culture policies, and the fix is in introducing young people like Belcher at an early age to more self-reliance, and positive role models.  Progressives have sought to destroy positive role models so that society would have a greater need for a more centralized government who cared for everyone and everything, and the world with its current miseries is their fault.  So with that said it was not the gun that caused the terrible events at Arrowhead Stadium, it was progressive philosophy, and for that they can all hang their heads in shame.

And to my conservative mild-mannered friends—don’t be afraid to call people like Costas a pussy—because he is.  He makes a living interviewing celebrities and commenting on sports—the worlds great distraction.  He had no right to bring his ass kissing ways to our living rooms when all we wanted to do was watch grown men run into each other at full speed and knock the shit out of one another.  Costas should have kept his mouth shut and not stuck his nose into an issue he is not qualified to speak on—since he has made a living as a “yes man” not a defender of liberty or even a man of self-reliance which to me is the only kind of man there is.  Tyranny and slavery are built on the backs of people like Bob Costas who seek to fix the symptom, not the cause so that the bright lights of a football game can resume without guilt.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Teacher Kelsey Hartmann from Huber Heights: Having sex with kids to keep a market edge

I knew there was a reason I always liked Darryl Parks from 700 WLW.  On his first Saturday show of December 2012 he offered an excellent reason why Kelsy Hartmann from Huber Heights—was caught  having sex with one of her 16-year-old students in her husband’s car while pretending to do some last-minute shopping on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving.  According to Kelsey’s latest evaluation she was an excellent teacher, leaving Darryl to conclude that Kelsey was simply doing what many other teachers have been doing in the competitive field of public education, and that is to personally reach out to their students to give them something unique that all the evolving education tools are doing better, such as the modern computer.  One thing that a computer can’t do for young students is have intercourse with them to keep their interests so during these very difficult times when school budgets are shrinking, and work forces are being reduced teachers like Kelsey have determined to stay on top of their students–quite literally.  Maestros de escuelas públicas de amor tener sexo con hombres jóvenes y chupar sus penes!  No wonder so many parents support public education for their needy young sons.  And no wonder so many students take to the streets to tear down the signs of tax opposition when school levies are attempted.  The young boys of public education know they can’t get sex this easy anywhere else but in their classrooms, so they defend their sexually charged teachers with a fury.  Check out the pictures of Kesley at Darryl’s blog posting, and then listen to his Saturday broadcast below.

Read more: http://www.700wlw.com/pages/onair_parks.html#ixzz2DtP4w9z8

I think Darryl is right; Rosetta Stone software has changed the field of foreign language education.  In these modern times of 2012, it is rather easy to learn a foreign language should one wish to, completely invalidating the old archaic style performed in front of a classroom.  The two years of mandatory high school foreign language education is absolutely out of date—because the modern computer does a much better job than a traditional teacher.  So credit must be given to Kelsey and her barrage of other public school teachers and their labor unions all around Ohio who have tener mucho sexo con hombres jóvenes y tragar su semon en cantidades tales que los maestros beben su hombría por la taza con el café.  And we thought teachers were drinking coffee in the morning……………………..apparently not.

A computer can teach young students in high school better than just about any teacher in any course these days—math, science, history and especially foreign language. Since most people learn by visual stimulation, the computer is much better equipped to perform most of the modern education tasks with far superior results than the traditional teacher, and the computer is a lot cheaper on labor too.  But a computer will not steal the keys of her husband’s car and meet with students on the side of a road and have sex with them to keep their interest in public education like Kelsey and her other tri-state teachers will.  That is the one thing the computer cannot do better, and that is actually provide such “hands on” training.

So whenever a school levy is voted for, and support for public education is declared, think of the over the top and under the covers antics of many fine teachers like Kelsey Hartmann and how dedicated to their students they truly are—so much so that they are willing to stay on top of their students needs—literally.  Kelsey le encanta sentarse sobre el pene de sus alumnos en el asiento trasero de un coche.    Auuuuhhh…………….public education at its finest.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

Geithner’s Insult to America: What Progressives Really Want

Lucky for Tim Geithner that I wasn’t sitting across from him when the White House instructed him to tell the Republicans on the Hill that cuts to the deficit were not on the table during the “fiscal cliff” negotiations and only tax increases to the wealthy were an option. I don’t blame Mitch McConnell at all for bursting out into laughter at such a ridiculous proposal. I recognize that McConnell and Speaker Boehner have enriched themselves greatly as public servants, but they are at least functioning from the real world when it comes to matters of finance. Geithner and Socialist Obama aren’t even functioning from this planet—but rather are hell-bent on their Marxist dreams concocted during college pot parties about destroying the rich so the poor can thrive—attacking the bourgeois class then giving power to the proletariat through legally sanctioned theft. Geithner and Obama represent the destructive socialist nature of the modern academic, and are not at all interested in managing the finances of America by reducing the debt. Their only concern is to act as domestic terrorists by wreaking the economy so that the wealth of America will be redistributed throughout the world. You can read about Mitch McConnell’s reaction in the Huffington Post, CLICK HERE.


As people who have had to sit across from me in these kinds of talks can attest—with much less at stake, I would have likely knocked Tim Geithner’s fu**ing head clean off and kicked it across the Atlantic Ocean back to Europe where Geithner and Obama’s world vision belongs, upon hearing such a ridiculous and insulting negotiating position. It is offensive to listen to these progressive fools utter the kind of nonsense that they are advocating in this current fiscal crisis. It would appear that all progressives no matter what level of office they hold perform in the same terrorist fashion. They evade the truth, build their case with emotion, and look for consensus among the ill-informed and down-right stupid to back their infantile strategies hoping that democratic thuggery can trump intelligence in the court of public opinion. They use fear to sell their distorted ideas and that makes them terrorists by any definition.

Even in my local school district of Lakota where I was on the front line of three tax increase defeats progressive education specialists refused to listen to the will of the voters and instead lobbied for yet another tax increase attempt—just like the idiots in the current White House. The people who backed me on the tax defeats told the school to simply reduce their labor costs by 5% so the district could live within their current budget—which would have required the school management to instruct the labor union to take a 5% cut in pay—or take a hike—which progressive management refused to do. Infuriated I let my anger explode at the ridiculous progressive policies that had emerged from educators in my community as it became clear that financial sustainability was not the objective of the school, but a radical wealth-redistribution scam advanced by labor unions hiding behind the façade of government support. The goal of the tax levies was not to educate children, or to even have a good school. It is to increase taxes to the extent that the “wealthy” pay more in the form of higher taxes on their property so that wealth redistribution can take place. Progressives in education are willing to destroy anything that gets in their way, including the communities they pretend to serve, in order to advance their radical agendas, and they do it with the same selfless conviction of a World War II kamikaze pilot from Japan.

Geithner and Obama are doing the exact same thing in the macrocosm of national politics that I have seen at local schools everywhere—it is all part of the same progressive battle plan. It has nothing to do with money management, and everything to do with radical change in stealing from the bourgeoise and strengthening the proletariat without the wealth being earned by those characters—and they get by with it because nobody understands history or the definitions of what progressives are really up to. Geithner thought he could pull the wool over everyone’s eyes with his gross insult to America and not propose cuts to the deficit. But only an attack on capitalism was put on the table to curb spending that Obama is guilty of perpetuating. Geithner is lucky he is dealing with politicians who have soft hearts because they have gotten wealthy off the public dime, like McConnell and Boehner—and Obama. McConnell only laughed at the ridiculous proposal. I see it as an invasion of my country by domestic enemies from academia.


The only issue that should be on the table in 2013 is a reduction of the deficit. At $16 trillion dollars there is no other matter of importance that should be on anybody’s mind. Even I said two weeks ago that Republicans should cave on the tax increases so that the socialist Democrats can choke on their decisions. But my concession was based on budget cuts which it would be assumed would be a foregone conclusion. However, Democrats have shown their cards at the negotiating table and they are not playing the same kind of game that the rest of us are playing. They are looking to undermine America with even more debt and to break the ideological back of tradition with a fury that no American is comfortable in admitting. Geithner showed his hand, and that is the intention, which is why my reaction would have been much more violent than McConnell’s. The strategy of Obama and his goons is insulting and obvious to anybody with basic intelligence. Unfortunately many people have shown that they are willing to look the other way so long as Obama, Geithner and the other White House terror squad are willing to steal on behalf of the proletariat and level the playing field for the lazy, the corrupt, and the destitute in exchange for a vote at election time.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

  

The Future: A strategy guide to meeting it politically, philosophically and through religion

Much of the work I do here, and why I conduct it so fervently, is because the human race is at an impasse, and the quality for which we deal with that issue will determine our species fate.   When I blast away at the progressive political platform it is not just to embrace the values I find valuable which might be summed up in every John Wayne movie ever made, or the tone of Walt Disney’s America shown gallantly in the television series Davy Crocket.   What I love about America is captured in those artistic tributes to traditional value, because within those tabernacles of virtue is a formula for human prosperity.   Progressives on the other hand are stuck in an old version of human fairness pursuit from a world that predates the Industrial Revolution and are functioning from a philosophy that is dangerous to themselves and everyone on this planet—the concept of collectivism.  The reason why is in what is coming up rapidly for the human race—because each and every one of us must come to grips with it very soon—as in thirty years or less.  That perilous impasse that is meeting us faster than we are meeting “it” is called THE FUTURE.  Watch the below videos carefully and take notes.

I have written extensively here about such a future.  I have written about flying cars, cancer treatments, a real understanding of human history through unpopular revelations in the field of archaeology    I have talked about advanced horticulture methods, and the miracles of the energy source Thorium.  I have done all this to begin to place in your mind dear reader the changes that have been placed before us and to measure the value of correct decisions.  If it seems that I am particularly obsessed with education, politics, and even religion it is because those three things most corrupt the purity of the future with unnecessary impediments caused by functioning from the wrong philosophy.  This is why I often gush over the fictional stories of Star Wars, because I understand the power of myth all too well, and how myth shapes the philosophies of mankind.  Once philosophy is built for the human mind, then religion is constructed to represent those values for the masses—and the philosophies of old, much of it that is collectively based must be cast away otherwise the future will be very dangerous place.  Individually based philosophies will lead to great human achievement and prosperity for all.  In the modern world Star Wars offers this type of philosophy as well as a way to meet the startling changes the future holds through technology—so I am a big fan.  George Lucas has done a brilliant thing, he has shown how society can advance into the realm of our present future without destroying ourselves spiritually, or politically because the struggles of Star Wars are essentially over those concepts.

In the immediate future—I’m talking about decades, it will become optional to die a natural death.  An aging body is a ridiculous concept that can now be controlled through stem cell construction.  A body should be able to rebuild new tissue throughout its entire life even if that lifespan is 1000 years as was quite common for Biblical figures in the Old Testament.  Modern pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies, (and now Obamacare) are holding back this technology to maintain their profit profiles, but it will not hold.  The technology is about to surpass the restrictions of the medical field out of the sheer need for financial sustainability.   The key to Social Security and Medicare is not more money, but less, because people will soon live to be 200 to 300 years old and they will still be working well past the age of 55 and 65 years old.  Mankind will have to give up the idea of “the golden years” and traditional retirements because aging is about to become an unnecessary hardship.

With computing power being what it is now, and what it will be within 10 years, the mysteries of the human brain will be solved and the idea of what a “soul” is will become clear.  Human being will gain the ability to UPLOAD their identities into other bodies which will prevent even accidental death by tragedy.  In fact, sex, race, and even human ability such as strength, height, and physical attractiveness will all be options in the world of tomorrow.  The idea that has been introduced to us all though avatar creation through social websites like Facebook and Twitter as well as the online gaming world are metaphorical instances of a reality that is coming to our daily lives.  Online gaming such as seen on games like World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, and many others will become a reality for our own bodies—especially as the younger generation moves into their 40’s and 50’s.  They will have no problem making these difficult psychological adjustments as they have been playing computer games their entire lives and have created thousands of online characters all representing key aspects to their human souls.  The body those souls reside in do not matter as much as the essence of the spirit behind the soul.

Education of tomorrow will be as simple as uploading a new program into your home computer.   A child could reasonably have uploaded onto their brains the entire wealth of knowledge of the human race in just a few decades from now completely eliminating the need for classrooms known so well in traditional education which has proven ineffective.  12 to 18 years of study in schools is unnecessary in the world of tomorrow as knowledge is simply an upload not created by neuron building through repetition as it is today, but data directly implanted onto neurons constructed upon an upload of the data.  So holding on to the old, archaic formula that the government is driving is a foolish gesture that only holds society back unnecessarily.

There are literally millions of such difficult technical advances that are coming our way within the next hundred years so it is important that during these transitions government is reduced to a minimal amount, because these new technologies will be devastating in the hands of overreaching government dictators.  It is best to eliminate these threats to the human race now rather than deal with them later when ousting their power will be much, much more difficult.  But they will be ousted.  Their days are numbered because I can say that the youth that grew up with online gaming will not put up with such restrictions.  In video games many of the environments are best reflected by laissez-faire capitalism.   It is this type of economy that is most prevalent in the online world because politicians have not learned how to loot off of it—but it’s too late.  Too many people have had a taste of pure capitalism online, and will expect it in the years to come.  Once they learn that the economy of the real world is caused by political tampering, they will become very angry—and active.  Currently many citizens tune out of politics preferring fantasy evasion over grim reality so long as they have enough money to buy new video games and pay for their basic living needs.  But if that is threatened, they will expect laissez-faire capitalism and won’t understand the politics of United Nation power grabs like Agenda 21 or the fairness merits of socialism.  In the world of computer gaming no such fairness is appreciated since all computer users are equal—they can be as big and strong, fast or slow as they desire when they set up their avatars.  What separates the good from the bad is effort and commitment something the most devout video gamer understands very well.  It is only a matter of a few years that those kinds of options will be available to the masses in reality.

Some of the great quarterbacks of old from the game of Football is Doug Flutie and Joe Montana—both guys were about 5-10 weighting about 190 to 200 pounds.  Just twenty years later most quarterbacks are 6-5 and weigh 240.  Evolution is happening and technical advances will soon make quarterbacks that are 7 foot tall and weigh 300 pounds.  These advances will occur because the game will demand it through competition.  And if a player gets injured, instead of going on the IR for the rest of a season, he will simply upload himself into a new body that he has constructed to use as a backup while their primary body heals.  Paralysis and handicaps will be a thing of the past.  These things will happen whether or not we are ready for them, so it is our job to get ready for them, and to focus our philosophies and religious on ways to train our minds to contend with the adjustments.     But the path of the political progressive is a doomed one.  They are literally clamoring to outdated ideas that were put into motion a 100 years ago and are trying to hold society back politically to preserve them from the changes that are about to flood society with the dawn of a new age just as revolutionary as the Industrial Revolution.

Speaking for myself I never plan to retire.  I don’t see myself living in a Florida condo taking 20 pills a day just to stay alive and watching the sun rise and set waiting to die.  Rather 100 years from now I plan to still be active doing all types of projects pursing the ideas my mind craves to consume, and I plan to run over any political ideology that gets in the way of my doing it.  I’m not in love with power or politics in any fashion.  I just want to be left alone to live my life in the fashion I want to live it.  And in the future it will only be easier—not harder to do such.  The impediments of our age are manufactured and false made uselessly cumbersome to protect the empires of old and their out-dated thinking that runs counter to what’s coming.  It does no good to pander to these types of people because it only delays the inevitable.  The future is an exciting place but it will be radically different from the lives we live today.  That is why it is important to preserve the American Constitution as the blueprint to a healthy society of tomorrow so that they power grabbers of corruption can inflict minimal damage in the days to come with archaic beliefs that are a century out-dated trying to hold back a future that is coming at us with a fury.

Rich Hoffman

www.tailofthedragonbook.com