These are my kind of girls. Who said Donald Trump didn’t do well with women? Ted Cruz does well with women, but not in the right way—sounds like he has serious problems—which Diamond and Silk do a wonderful service to break down for their viewers.
What was that Glenn Beck said about Ted Cruz—he’d drop him in a minute if any of these sex stories was true—but that he didn’t believe Ted had any “game” with women? Hmmmmm, sounds like Ted has more game than he let on. What are you gonna’ do now Beck?
I’m not a big fan because often degenerates, welfare recipients, and the type of people who are most at home on the Jerry Springer Show populate the premises—but Wal-Mart in Fairfield, Ohio off Princeton Rd by Bridgewater Falls is finding itself the victim of progressive attack. In spite of my feelings about the place and the people it attracts, I think what Wal-Mart does is wonderful as a retail outlet. There are many more good things than bad; I’m just not a fan of the place because of the people who are often there. Take them all away, and I enjoy going there. Put me at Wal-Mart on a crowded Saturday to pick up mulch, and I’m not a happy person. But my wife is, she has shopped there for the entire time it has been in that location and it helped raise our family with food options that made it much easier for her to be a stay-at-home mom. One thing about my wife, she is intensely loyal, so she loves that particular Wal-Mart because it has been good for helping her raise her family with low-cost options over the many years. She likes the people who work there and finds their company refreshing—mostly because many of them are older people—whom she typically gets along well with. Since she is a housewife, she is able to go to Wal-Mart during the day when most people are working—and typically has a good experience.
But on March 29th, 2016 the foundations of her reality were shaken to her very core. She had been there to spend quite a lot of money, she bought most of our food for the week, some other items and had picked up a $300 pair of glasses from the optometrist. It was a hefty bill to pay and she was enjoying spending the money at a store she believed in—to her Wal-Mart represents raw American value—red, white, and blue patriotism—getting the most products for the lowest cost—lack of unionized labor and goods and services all under one roof. You can get your eyes checked, a pharmaceutical order fulfilled and have your tires changed all while you shop for groceries, lawn supplies, and pick-up wonderful toys for the grandchildren. But to her shock for the first time in nearly 15 years, she stepped up to the check-out and only one lane was open—because it was the middle of a weekday and there wasn’t a need for multiple lanes to be open—and what she found was a transsexual kid dressed in blue lipstick, short black hair, a push-up bra, and a black skirt working the cash register. She had no choice but to go through his lane and she was very pissed off about it.
For context, we choose to live in an area of the country where we don’t have to deal with derelicts like this. As a couple, we don’t go to areas of the city where gay bars are prominent; we don’t hang out on college campuses, and we don’t go to music concerts where these kinds of people are increasingly commonplace. Even though I like Key West, we don’t hang out on Duval Street late at night where transsexuals, homosexuals, and transvestites are populating every street corner on the south end. We don’t go to Fantasy Fest there—where middle-aged repressed sociopaths with above average incomes can frolic in the decadence of a Romanian orgy. We don’t watch television shows that embrace those types of progressive attributes outside of male and female monogamous relationships. We don’t want that kind of crap in our life, and we make choices to avoid it. So it was quite a shock to my wife to have to deal one on one with such a progressive disaster—a full-fledged transsexual that was so flamboyant about his imposition in our community, that he was audaciously challenging anybody to “judge” him incorrectly—because he was protected by law to be an imbecile. It wasn’t alright with her.
She endured the experience while transacting with the boy but shortly before leaving she just felt disgusted. So she proceeded to the customer service area to take back all her items and get her money back because she didn’t want to give money to a company that supported such behavior. She was appalled utterly. Of course the manager spoke to her and he basically stated that legally they were paralyzed from discriminating against the kid and that if they did, they feared a lawsuit—which I understand is exactly the case. The law handed down by Supreme courts both state and federal have given us these impositions and my wife was furious about it because now it was in her own back yard. The kid knew he was protected by law to harass the sensibilities of normal, average, good-hearted American morality, and she was fuming with anger over it. She gathered up the contact information to speak to corporate headquarters to complain then she headed to the optometrist to take back her very nice new glasses.
Luckily, the lady working the counter was a levelheaded older person who calmed her down. I won’t go into the details of what the lady told my wife—because I don’t want to get her into legal trouble—but the short story is this—the other employees working that day agreed with my wife—only they weren’t allowed to say anything about the kid. They were forced to put up with the little scum bag. By law, they have had their First Amendment rights taken away from them—the transsexual was allowed to harass everyone else, but nobody was allowed to harass him—by law. And Wal-Mart’s hands were tied behind their back while progressive attacks of middle-America punched them square in the face.
In the future, my wife simply won’t buy anything if she has to deal with people like that kid. He shouldn’t be anywhere that customers have to interact with him. This whole episode reminded me of a trip my family took to the Mellow Mushroom in West Chester. I like the pizza there, but often find the environment too progressive for my tastes. Now since Pies and Pints has opened at Liberty Center we choose to go there for fresh pizza instead of the Mellow Mushroom just because that Liberty Center environment is much more conservative. To be honest, when I am spending $70 to $100 dollars on food I expect an attractive waitress—and by attractive, I’d like her to be a young college girl with good hygiene, speaks in complete sentences, isn’t covered in tattoos and body piercings and is well within the appropriate weight for her height. If I end up with a guy, he needs to look well-groomed, have short hair without dandruff, and speak respectively. Usually it’s not a problem, and it’s certainly not sexual—it’s just that beat up old wrecks are not pleasant to be around. Younger people are like new cars off the assembly line, and when you are going out to eat, you want to see new cars, not vehicles ready for the junk yard. If we wanted to see that, we’d just stay home. Chili’s is particularly good about having a nice mix of such people—their recruiting is obviously successful. They can’t discriminate, but they manage to create a competitive environment to weed out the undesirables. But at the Mellow Mushroom of course they get progressive kids applying because the environment attracts those types of people—and that is the biggest turn-off for me. On one occasion, we had an openly gay waiter and he drove me nuts. He was so flamboyant that I almost left—he was really pushing the whole gay thing commenting on my daughter’s clothing along with sucking up to my wife. Of course, by reading this, you can get a sense of her state of mind. She hasn’t wanted to go back there since. I have under professional circumstances, but she hasn’t. We tend to vote with our feet, so these progressive trends have an impact on a company’s bottom-line. I considered the $150 dollars we spent there that day to be completely wasted money. We would have had much more fun popping in a frozen pizza into the oven at home—because at least then we wouldn’t have some gay guy hitting on us and doing who-knows-what to our food between the kitchen and our table.
That is precisely why progressive activists have pushed to have protected legislation allowing kids like that Wal-Mart transsexual to come into our neighborhoods and assault our sensibilities, but they expect not to receive any fire back in return. They—being the progressive activists deliberately dressing up in blue lipstick and a skirt with a push-up bra to work as cashier at Wal-Mart—intend harm to the lifestyle my wife and I have chosen for ourselves. They will of course say that we are being “judgmental” and are advocating “hate speech” because the law has empowered them with such beliefs. What the legal system and the politics that has shaped it neglect is that being “judgmental” is one of the greatest attributes of living as a human being. Progressive activists and the legal system are demanding that we stop thinking and just accept these incursions against tradition, and in my family, that is not acceptable. Not at all. If scum bags like this transsexual kid want to flaunt themselves in front of our faces, there will be consequences. They don’t have a right to impose themselves on our sensibilities. If they want to do what they do, they have a right—but through competition, we must have options to avoid them. I suggested to my wife that she not shop at Wal-Mart, that she stay in places where the prices are higher and along with them, the expectations of the clientele. But honestly, the Kroger Marketplace in Liberty Township has more than its share of these degenerates shopping there—the situation is endemic to the progressive incursion cast upon us by a political class that wishes to destroy the American family. She loves that particular Wal-Mart, so she wasn’t open to that idea. In the future if she doesn’t have options to avoid people like that transsexual employee, she just won’t shop that day. And that’s the way it’s going to be. When we go out to dinner, we don’t want a bunch of silly boys prancing around like girls expecting a 17% tip with their hands all over our food—and we don’t want to exchange money with people who look like their hands are disgusting—because if they dress that way—god only knows where their hands have been. We don’t claim to be modern or hip, we don’t like these changes to the family structure of American society and short of invoking an Amish privilege toward tradition—we certainly won’t be endorsing such lifestyles under any circumstances—especially, with our hard-won money. It is a shame that companies like Wal-Mart are so terrified of the legal implications of such justified discrimination based on sound judgment. Because if there were any justice in this world—those types of things wouldn’t happen in our town. I can see them happening in places writhe with filth, like Las Vegas, Key West, and the various swingers clubs around the world—but not in a family rich environment like Butler County. The legislators who allowed such things to happen should be ashamed of themselves for not having more courage to stand against progressive activists. Because that leaves the dirty work to people like me—which is not what we hired you politicians to do in the first place—cave to the worst among us, so that the good would have to just endure the folly.
This has never been more evident than in the city of Detroit—utterly destroyed by socialism. Chicago is not far behind and is currently propped up exclusively by debt incurrence. Chicago doesn’t have the wealth building ability to pay their debts at the rate that they are acquiring them. But they are small potatoes compared to California—which was once one of the great economies of the world. Now it’s quickly on its way to becoming an empty husk of what it once was and now they have delivered to themselves one of the final nails into their coffin—they approved an increase in the minimum wage with a plan to get to $15 dollars per hour within a few years. Without question, based on the strength of the Bernie Sanders campaign in the West, the entire coastline has been destroyed by progressive politics greatly crippling the American economy. Now with the minimum wage hike they have fully committed to socialism which of course will deplete their once great state of its wealth quickly.
As I’ve said before, I have worked in fast food for a number of years as a second job. I understand the nature of it—and how hard it can be—and at no time did I ever consider that those positions should be paid any kind of “living wage.” Nobody should seek to make a long career out of a fast food job. They are entry-level jobs that should encourage people to improve their skills and value to the capitalist marketplace. For instance—when I worked in fast food, while other people goofed off on their breaks, I read books so that I could become smarter for better things to come. I worked many odd jobs for essentially the first 15 years of my adult life—up until about 35 years of age. Some of those odd jobs were at fast food places—like Wendy’s, McDonald’s, Frisch’s and so on. During that entire period I never wasted one single break on needless exercises. I was always reading books and trying to improve myself—and there isn’t one person from my past who could step forward and say otherwise. I learned a lot of things in these jobs which obviously helped me later on in life. No, I didn’t get paid much, but the wealth I took away from those jobs was invaluable. But always there was a hunger to do better for my family which pushed me to continuously improve.
Without that motivation to step away from fast food, a lot of talent in America is sure to be wasted. Getting paid so much money for the entry-level workforce weakens all the market mechanisms which make capitalism so successful, which of course is the point of progressives who have been advocating the $15 dollar an hour minimum wage. Of course if the minimum wage is set at $15 then all the jobs upstream from fast food will have to increase which is how the socialists have always planned to attack the American economy—by striking at the profit of corporations for the good of the “people” as if they had equal ownership of the means of labor.
The unintended consequence is that companies like McDonald’s will either downsize and further automate their operations lessening their reliance on labor, or they will relocate to some other area of the country that does not have such hefty financial burdens toward their profit margins. Every video game player should understand this concept. Without some measure of profit—whether its points gained, or trophies won in competition with others—there is little incentive to play a game or open a business—if there is no profit. Human beings are driven by profit. As an example—I am a big fan of the Assassin’s Creed video games. There are lots of ways to “profit” in those games—as you succeed you get to open up new areas to explore, you get achievement trophies to share online with the friends in your network, and of course you earn upgrades to your playable character. Every Silicone Valley geek understands how this works—yet they have a hard time applying these lessons to real life—such as in politics. The same young people who will play an online game for 24 straight hours trying to grind it out to earn bonuses—will stand on a street corner protesting McDonald’s for a minimum wage hike without understanding that they are weakening the game of life for which we all live by. In their minds the two worlds are separated by fantasy and reality—but in the human mind—they are one in the same.
No video gamer wants their achievements and hard work penalized so some newbie can just come into a game like Assassin’s Creed and instantly be as good as everyone else. They are expected to work hard to earn the right and respect of everyone else. Well, the same holds true in a capitalist society. No top executive wants to see some snot nosed kid step directly into a corner glass office in a high-rise firm who hasn’t fought and earned the right to be there. And no straight out of college kid should earn $6 figure salaries unless they’ve done the work to be the top of their field of endeavor. By giving fast food workers an instantly high minimum wage—they are penalizing all those in life who play the game of capitalism hard and create all the jobs for which socialists are so eager to give away for free.
The net result will be fewer jobs in California, higher prices because of the lack of competition, and a general gradual lessening of their global economic prowess. The benefits that so many Californians take for granted today, such as having a McDonald’s down the road for a quick coffee and a breakfast will evaporate the higher that the minimum wage increases rise. McDonald’s will automate and implement those new devices into their stores to protect their margins—which is the lifeblood of their company—it’s not to serve society—it’s to make money—to earn points in the capitalist system. Then what California will end up doing along with socialist Seattle is force McDonald’s to reduce their staffing levels all across the country minimizing job opportunities—not increasing them. For the guy like me who just wanted to earn a little extra money and experience—those jobs may not be available if McDonald’s has to drop their minimum staffing levels from 6 or 7 employees to 3 or 4 to maintain their current margins. Once they develop a formula in California for dealing with the increased costs—they’ll implement that strategy to every store they have around the world.
So it is very sad to see that California took the plunge further into socialism. But I did tell everyone a long time ago that all this was coming—and we know what it looks like—and what impact it has—yet they did it anyway. It further prevents our national GDP from ever having a chance to overtake our massive debt with increased productivity. It certainly puts us all further in the hole—which was always the strategy. How does that make you feel America? It should make you VERY angry.
It is surprising that this video hasn’t had more airtime. Obviously the #NEVERTRUMP people are salivating at an opportunity to pounce on Donald Trump after he effectively took off for a week to rest and welcome the birth of his latest grandchild. Cruz moved up on him in Wisconsin and the media thinks they have him cornered finally and can knock him out of the race with a gauntlet of criticism that has been unheard of in American politics. Meanwhile, this Cruz story is pretty important. There is obviously something very diabolical going on. If the guy cheats on his wife and is claiming to be a “Christian” this is a big deal. Carly jumped in entirely too fast, and Cruz is giving off the entirely wrong body language to be innocent. He never answered the question which is pretty bad.
Look dear reader, Donald Trump even if he doesn’t win states like Wisconsin, Colorado, Indiana, Oregon and several other places still wins easily with 1237 delegates by June. He may not even need to win California to get those delegates. I’ve done the math. Donald Trump would have to have a major meltdown to lose. Granted, the questions at this stage get harder and he has a lot against him—literally at every turn. But even if he only does “OK”, he still wins the nomination without a brokered convention pretty easily. If Trump keeps his swagger, the nomination is his.
The media wants people to believe that the whole presidential race is closer and more dramatic than it really is. They want Trump to keep working hard to win the nomination because it makes them all a lot of money having him on the news every night. So if they can delay it, they’ll do what they can to keep him in the news until the general election against Hillary begins. They would like a solid eight months of Trump ratings to generate several years worth of cable news projections. The Cruz story is going nowhere because there is no money in it. But for voters, they should be asking hard questions about Ted Cruz. He doesn’t have a chance to win as president, but he is a sitting senator and a Tea Party favorite. If he’s a cheater we need to know. Watching that video of Cruz and Carly indicates that something is very, very wrong.
Up until really the National Enquirer article I was not adamant that Ted Cruz should not be the presidential nominee. But after hearing him get the endorsements of people like Lindsey Graham, Jeb Bush, and after Cruz actually hired a Bush to work in his campaign, then witnessing all the dirty tricks that Ted played before Donald Trump hit back—like the hit piece on Melania—I have decided that under no circumstances am I going to support any sitting politicians for President. If someone holds a political position now or ever—I will not vote for them in the upcoming election. The political establishment is doing everything it can to protect itself from a rebellion they created because of their mass incompetence and dysfunction—and watching their behavior has made me sick of the process. I don’t believe any of them. It is obvious to me, and I’m hardly one who falls for disillusion and fantasy. Yet I have many friends, several who make livings thinking about this kind of stuff—some who actually work for Glenn Beck—who say they won’t vote for Donald Trump because he’s not a conservative. Well, I think Trump is a conservative in a very liberal part of the country. He may not be Montana conservative, but he is certainly bold enough to call himself a Republican in the very blue state of New York. People can argue and debate all they want, but Trump has a wealth building track record that you can see and touch. Cruz does not. Instead you get conspiratorial information about Ted Cruz when you do a little digging—and it’s not good—like the following videos. Watch them all then decide if you really believe that Ted Cruz is what he says he is.
If there was anything I liked about Ted Cruz it was during his filibuster speech in front of the Senate where he mentioned Ayn Rand. Like Paul Ryan he claims to be a fan—which gave me hope for both of them really. But then again, so was Glenn Beck—and all those people have missed the point she was trying to make. Ted Cruz is no closer to living in the world of Galt’s Gulch than Jessie Jackson and now that he is being pressed as one of two front runners—his story is breaking down. This is why we have a long primary season and why running for president is so difficult. Everyone has to be vetted and we need to see how these people act when they start sweating. Cruz has not done well. Even if he didn’t cheat on his wife with five women—he didn’t do a very good job of stepping out in front of the story. His body language was obviously implicating him behind the tough talk. He came across to me like the kid seen in the below video who blamed Donald Trump for putting teeth marks in a chair. Trump because he is the political outsider—is a convenient punching bag—and Cruz’s team uses dirty tricks too much against him in a passive aggressive manner. They played dirty with Ben Carson, and several others as well. Then when they tried to appeal to Mormons in Utah with Holy-roller ads using a naked Melania to smear Trump, it was obvious to me that when pressed as a possible president, Cruz would behave in the same fashion.
Of course Cruz wants to debate Trump one on one—it is his strongest aptitude. Trump would be crazy to fall for the invite—to give a competitor a chance by playing to his strength. That is not how you win competitions conservatives—you must exploit the weaknesses of your rival—you don’t prop them up. Cruz is a great debater on policy and all the things that politicians talk about. But what has he done in his life that says he could do anything but talk? We’ve heard the talk before and look where it’s gotten us. No, we need now a man of action and I don’t think there is a single one in public office these days within the Washington D.C. culture who can do the job of president. There are a few here and there around the country that gives me hope for the republic, but not enough to matter at the federal level yet. We are in a gunless rebellion right now. Instead of casualties and collateral damage we are seeing people lose or gain their careers. That you could say is a more humane way of dealing with insurgents who have failed at their jobs of running the country—and they neurotically respond as if they’d rather die than just lose a social status. But this rebellion has to happen. We either take back our country through an election or we do it with some militia organized force—but things cannot continue as they have. And what I’ve seen out of Ted Cruz is that he’s part of the system—not fighting against it. Even if Cruz did love the novel Atlas Shrugged—being married to the spouse that he has now would prevent him from acting philosophically from it—which makes him no more effective in government than one of the Bush presidents or the worthless senators like Graham.
Then there was Cruz’s little speech about strong women as he defended his wife Heidi from the wrath of Donald Trump after Ted threw the first punch. Not that women have to be barefoot and pregnant, and must spend all their time in the kitchen caring for their families to have value, but Cruz did not sound very conservative to me. There is this whole metrosexual revolution of men who do cooking for their wives and share in the domestic tasks like doing laundry that are derived from the whole progressive push to make everyone equal, and Cruz like a lot of men are a part of it. In human society the only real differences between men and women are those regarding the sexual roles—that really is it. If we all placed our brains on a table and took away all the physicality, only then would we truly be equal. But with physical bodies, we have roles on earth that point straight into the bedroom. For instance, most women like to take the submissive role in sex, and therefore, they like to pamper their men with domestic obligations—but only if that man has went out into the world and conquered it in some fashion—with either a big paycheck, or in protecting the family from some disturbance. Men and women must respect each other, but the roles they play in their family life are like foreplay to what happens in the bedroom. In the most biologically primal fashion that directly leads to a happy sex life, women like to know that a man is changing the tire on the family car and the man likes to see his woman cooking the dinner he worked so hard to put on the table. That respect leads to a healthy sex life of mutual fulfillment. In this modern age of high divorce rates and mousey men who share all the cooking and laundry duties with their wives—they don’t understand why the women in their lives don’t want to plop up on the hood of their car in their garage and have spontaneous sex. It is because the women don’t respect men who endorse all those beta male attributes. Of course there are exceptions—and some people make it work through sheer will—but biologically we are all wired the same way through our physical bodies—and so long as we live on earth together—those rules apply to everything we do. Trump understands those rules—Cruz certainly doesn’t and you can see it on Heidi’s face—she is suffering. Most women in Heidi’s position use career to substitute the closeness they lack with their husbands. These days’ women have been taught from little girls that this progressive method is the way they must conduct their lives—so they usually enter marriage confused as to their roles within the family. But just a note to men in general, if you have to get your wife drunk to want to have sex, you are screwing up your romantic life with her. Men in that situation need to change things for the benefit of the woman. Society won’t acknowledge this problem, but it’s quite obvious—and it is destroying an entire generation of relationships. Ted Cruz came out in his chastisement of Donald Trump sounding like a silly soccer dad justifying his own personal failures—and it was certainly pathetic. It wasn’t presidential, and it certainly wasn’t “conservative.”
That of course brings us back to Donald Trump and the Cruz supporters who declare that the New York billionaire isn’t a conservative. Trump is rich and he didn’t get that way giving away money. He has a happy housewife at home taking care of his family. Trump is pro gun, pro border security, against Common Core, and favors lowering taxes with an aggressive plan that might actually work. He is decisive and a natural leader and never backs down from a fight. What’s not to like? And he has a track record of accomplishment both good and bad–we can see what we are buying with him. With Cruz, who says he’s the ultimate conservative—what do we really know? Because when you peek under the hood there is a lot not to like—he’s underpowered, feminized, and all talk. The holes in Cruz are showing. If he’s a true conservative then we are in a lot of trouble. Because he does a lot of things and holds positions that are quite contrary to true conservatism—and you can see that in his campaign. And now that too much has been said, there is no going back for me. If the Republican Party does not embrace Donald Trump I’m done with them. If there is anybody but a pure independent from the political establishment in the White House—then I’m done with the process and will turn from elections into Sam Adams. Look people, I’m not a Constitutionalist—I think the Hamilton version of the founding documents was entirely too liberal. I’m an Anti-Federalist by that old definition and if there is movement in the Constitution—it won’t be more toward a socialist state like Obama presents as an option—it will be further to the right—the way that Thomas Jefferson always intended. Because only in that manner can we get to what we were supposed to always be in America—and Trump is the means to get there. Cruz is just more of the same. We don’t need another scandalous preacher from the White House. We need someone who knows how to manage others—something no politician has shown me they are able to do—because they just don’t have the skill set to accomplish the task. Ted Cruz has been nothing but a public servant his whole life. He’s hardly an outsider. He’s simply sold himself that way—and I’m not buying—under any condition. The Glenn Beck types are wrong. They need to go back and re-read Atlas Shrugged. Cruz isn’t any of the characters in Atlantis. He’s at the table with Wesley Mouch. Actually, Ted’s wife is—while the presidential candidate is doing the dishes.
They are lucky in a lot of ways that in America, we have the 1st Amendment. Because the outrage is protecting them from those of us who are fully awake. We are shooting words in an open marketplace instead of bullets. It is obvious that many on the political left and establishment right don’t like the rebellion that is currently occurring, because not enough people are complying to sustain their formulaic plans. But, too bad. I will never submit to their way of thinking. It’s just not going to happen. If given opportunities to compete in the marketplace of ideas, I’m happy to use that method to fight them with debate. But if that goes away, I’m happy to do it in other ways—and I can assure everyone, that compliance with the current conditions is not an option. To understand what I’m talking about, do yourself a favor, listen and watch this Alex Jones broadcast from Friday March, 25th. While you are working in the garage on this nice spring day, or around the house, listen to this very good report—its three hours long. I don’t agree with all of it, but it is quite good at detailing the fight we are all facing. Don’t be asleep, it’s time to get up and go to work. Join me on the battlefield.
And do a friend a favor and send this to them to help them wake up as well. If you want the evidence of what Jones is saying, I have written millions and millions of words providing the proof. Just look up any topic in the search bar on the left and you’ll find the evidence to substantiate what you are hearing. If you doubt any of this remember that last night, the same day as this Alex Jones broadcast, Bernie Sanders–a socialist–filled up a 15,000 seat baseball stadium in Seattle. The communists are rising, and the only defense there is against them–are us.
Let me say this, I don’t like Heidi Cruz. I felt that way before the Cruz Super PAC went after Melania Trump recently. From what I’ve seen about Heidi she reminds me of all the school levy supporters that I have called latté sipping prostitutes in the past. I tend not to trust people who are too religious because to my experience there are skeletons in their closet that they use religion to conceal. I also don’t trust people who hide behind children. However, when Roger Stone was talking about the percolating sex scandal on the Alex Jones Show a few weeks ago concerning Ted Cruz, I wasn’t all that surprised.
When a man or woman has power, members of the opposite sex do try to seduce them as a lottery ticket toward advantage. When you are a senator and working with a lot of young people—and you are middle-aged on top of the normal temptations, it is not hard to imagine how something scandalous might happen to Ted Cruz. But when the National Enquirer came out with a major five woman scandal in their latest issue they either put themselves in a serious libel situation, or there is fire behind the smoke. Given where things are in the presidential race and the premise of the Cruz candidacy—the pure-hearted Christian conservative that is Glenn Beck’s second coming—this revelation provides insight that needs to be explored further.
I wasn’t going to say anything, but what the Cruz people did—in a roundabout way with the Super PAC in Utah made me mad. It was a holier than thou presumption that either means Cruz is pure as snow—which part of me has hoped that he was—or he was using religion in the same fashion as so many ministers have–to hide their sexual antics. And all this would point to Heidi Cruz—there is something not quite right about her. I don’t want her as a first lady. Ted Cruz has seemed too good to be true, which usually means he isn’t. So it will be interesting to see how this story plays out. I don’t put a lot of trust in the National Enquirer, but apparently this story has been on ice for several months by multiple sources and it was only the Enquirer who took the first step to break it. Given that the information was first discussed by Roger Stone over a week ahead of this announcement and that one of the women is Katrina Pierson—who is a Trump spokesman, it looks clear that Donald was willing to be a gentleman about the issue until the line was crossed with Melania. And I don’t blame him a bit.
I had been watching the Netflix show House of Cards and was enjoying it, except for the sex. There was just too much sex in it for me. I finally turned it off when Frank Underwood played by Kevin Spacey and his wife had three-way sex with their treasured Secret Service agent. It wasn’t just two guys on a girl, it was guy on guy sex and that is something I won’t support. However, the sex in the show is there for a reason. People want to see it, it reflects their desires, and is very much indicative of Washington D.C. culture. There is a part of me that hopes that this Ted Cruz sex scandal is all smoke, and if it is—I hope he sues the Enquirer into oblivion. But there is something about Heidi Cruz which tells me that it isn’t—and that Trump was alluding to that when he defended his own wife against the Super PAC ads about Melania.
Further angering me was the finger waving Ted Cruz calling Trump a sniveling coward for attacking Heidi. There are obvious problems with the Cruz marriage and that does not give Ted the authority to preach to Trump or anybody else what’s right. His campaign continues to have these kinds of scandals, where third-party participants do hit pieces on his behalf that have been downright dirty. At least with Trump, he’s out in the open about the things he does. Ted hides and now it looks like we all know why. If he can’t keep things cleaner than this during a campaign just think what he and his wife would be like in the White House. Even after Cruz’s little public refute of Donald Trump—the presidential front-runner was extremely quite on Twitter not posting anything for over 20 hours as this story developed. That tells me everything I want to know because that hasn’t happened over the entire six month history of Trump’s run. Why tick off all of the Cruz supporters when Ted let them down himself? The reason is that this is more than smoke.
After hour 20, this is what Donald Trump said about this issue, written 34 minutes prior to this writing:
I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.
Likewise, I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence. Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz.
I look forward to spending the week in Wisconsin, winning the Republican nomination and ultimately the Presidency in order to Make America Great Again.
If I wanted to, I could probably have a pretty successful career in talk radio. I do occasional guest spots here and there and have in the past made talk radio a big part of communicating hard ideas to people. But, on the front end, it doesn’t pay much money until you build up a syndicated show, and honestly, I don’t have time for that. It is one of many things that I have as a substantial talent wheelhouse that I enjoy. With all that said it does sometimes surprise me that I say things well ahead of the curve before mainstream audiences are prepared to understand them. I don’t listen to the big talk radio people every day—sometimes I go years without listening because I am busy with my own things—but independently—often—I come to conclusions at the same time as many of the big names—like Rush Limbaugh. That gives me often a feeling of self-satisfaction in knowing that the things I often say are on target—and not some random thought barely dangling from reality. If I say something, then a big name talk radio guy says something similar—arrived at independently—it is a good sign that you’re on the right track.
But I felt a little sorry for Rush Limbaugh and his many millions of listeners as he played a clip from CNN’s Chris Cuomo spouting off the benefits of communism as President Obama’s rapturous trip to Cuba unleashed a pent-up orgasm from the political left toward the long-awaited day of fulfillment. As the world burned in Brussels due to terrorism, Obama was getting pictures of himself in front of Che murals and doing the wave at a Cuban baseball game. Obama and his supporters who have sweat sweet love for communism for years were unable to contain their excitement and were showing mainstream America what has always been going on within the Democrat party and all progressive affiliations. The sound bites and Rush Limbaugh’s reaction to it are in the above clip. He was noticeably caught off guard by the love fest toward communism—because as a person who does nothing but analyze the news every day from a conservative view—he had underestimated the level of socialism and communism that has been percolating in America for several decades—really since the 1930s—aggressively. The communist efforts with strategic implementation peaked during the 1960s on college campuses, and then subsided a bit by the time Ronald Reagan was elected president and went back underground for a while. It emerged again in small doses during the Clinton presidency—for which Rush Limbaugh made his name so popular. It went’ back underground during Bush the younger’s presidency especially in the wake of 9/11 terrorism and concerns over the War in Iraq—and other places. But always brimming under the surface was a progressive push toward socialism then communism—it was evident in the No Child Left Behind act signed by George W. Bush, it was also in the creation of new governmental departments like the TSA and Homeland security—all ushered in on the back of mismanaged crises. Socialism from both political parties was what led to the 2008 recession as government had been making bad loans all in the name of “equality” and bailing out companies “too big to fail.” The American people elected a socialist in Obama because the emphasis was on “equality” not merit and the rest is history leading up to this Cuba visit—which for an admirer of communism—appears to be one of Obama’s lifelong goals hatched among his Marxist friends at the University of Chicago in the company of his friend—the terrorist Bill Ayers.
Well before I ever wrote on this site—more than six years ago as of this writing—I talked about these things. People thought it was a bit conspiratorial. People sometimes looked at me cross-eyed and whispered behind my back often—but it didn’t change the facts. Those who know me well understand that I’m far from some tin-hated conspiracy theorist. I’m usually always right when I say something and if I care enough to reveal it to somebody—I feel pretty strongly about it. It has always been a gift of mine to see right through the thick of things beyond layers of deceit to the truth which is always carefully hidden. Most adults tell “little white lies” about just about everything and I am extremely good at breaking down reality very quickly to discover the truth of a matter. When I listen to people say things I am always listening to what they don’t say behind the words. To me that is the most important voice—and believe me—there are always hidden things behind all forms of communication ranging from body language to Freudian slips of the tongue by selecting certain words to use under specific conditions. Most of the time the person speaking doesn’t consciously realize they give away hints as to what they are hiding, but like a dog whistle that only I can hear—I pluck from their depths the evidence.
Public schools have for a long time been teaching socialism—and I have always spoken out against it. Any time a teacher tells a student such as they do starting now in pre-school—that it is the obligation of a child to “share” their toys with others—that school is committed to teaching socialism with the hope that someday that student will embrace communism and vote for some political person like Bernie Sanders or the entire city council of Seattle, Oregon. These days most of our music is subtly advocating socialist ideals, most of our movies–especially films like the Best Picture movie from last year that I enjoyed a lot called—Birdman. Socialism is communicated from virtually every sector of our modern society and I have been pointing it out for as long as I can remember.
It’s often easy for people to forget about the hidden messages because they like the product wrapping it comes in. For instance with Birdman—which was a very good film that was metaphorical to the real life events of Michael Keaton who started all these superhero movies with the 1989 movie Batman—the film direction was so interesting that many of the little socialist messages were easy to ignore because the product was so entertaining. But the movie did hit all the usual “Best Picture” categories required to win an Academy Award—it had a lesbian scene, it showed the protagonist at war with his I.D. and his collective consciousness, it attacked the nature of art valued in this case by a stage play on Broadway compared to the blockbuster status of a Hollywood film career. The movie Birdman was very good at doing what it set out to do. But I also noticed a little rebellion in the movie—the director clearly knew what he was doing—while appealing to the Hollywood left of the Academy—making a movie he knew they would like—he at the end tipped his hat toward capitalism. It was very subtle, but he did it in clear rebellion of the socialist trend—and I’m seeing this more often from several Hollywood directors. At the end, not to give anything away when Michael Keaton’s daughter looks to see if her father had jumped out of a window to commit suicide. Instead of seeing a mangled body down below she looked up at the birds flying above and smiled as if acknowledging that her father was flying with them. Metaphorically of course she meant to imply that he had decided to give up the ridiculous art of his theater career and embrace his Birdman heroic persona crafted by the Hollywood blockbuster culture which was the central conflict of the entire picture. Does art mean personal fulfillment in material possessions acquired or is itself sacrificial in going to the extreme of blowing off one’s nose in front of a live audience to commit suicide on stage to show the world the extremes he would go to be an “artist?” Michael Keaton answered the question—he became the physical manifestation of who he really was in the end even though any Hollywood leftists would obviously miss the point. Birdman is a brilliant movie! Watch it!
I see more film directors now than ever putting subtle messages in favor of capitalism in their films that are meant to be concealed. It used to be the other way around, which is why the Chris Cuomo references were so shocking to Rush. We all grew up on certain kinds of influences, and in American culture, movies and music are huge reflections of our culture so unless you know what you are looking for, it is easy to miss. For instance, go back and watch the original Robocop and the anti capitalist messages are quite obvious—the villains are capitalists and the good guys are public sector employees. Still a good movie—but the subtle influence shaping the elements is obvious. Dirty Dancing had a harsh anti-Ayn Rand message, Dances with Wolves an obvious progressive dialogue that fully embraced Native American versions of westward expansion—which directly led to political legislation. The list goes on forever really—those are just a few examples.
But the pro-communist message has been spread for decades very quietly and carefully, and not even Rush Limbaugh understood the enormity of it. Conservatives have always joked about it, but assumed that the situation was overstated in regard to Democrats. It wasn’t. If anything, even people like me understated it because it forced us to admit that there were domestic enemies that were seeking to topple the United States from within and that they were our neighbors, our teachers, our firefighters and other public servants—which was just too much to deal with. It is much easier to think good of things than to admit that there might be a problem. It’s similar to the wife married to an alcoholic where the abusive husband is in denial. America has been in denial that the political left always intended communism—even many on the left themselves. But now that Obama is in Cuba—Marxism has infested the thinking of the entire Islamic community and is inspiring terrorism against “western—capitalist” targets, it was too much for Rush Limbaugh to even admit. A sitting president was in Cuba at a baseball game with a known criminal dictator as Brussels exploded with terror. Many thought Obama should come home and address the nation. Instead he was having the time of his life doing the wave in a Cuban crowd with a Castro communist. It might have shocked Rush Limbaugh—and I understand it, but it didn’t shock me. It only confirmed what I have been saying for decades. My only reason for reminding people about it now is in the hope that they will shut up and listen in the future. When I tell you something dear reader—you better listen. I don’t write all these things to make money. I do it to save the human race—because what good is money if nobody is around to use it.
It was the type of speech that made you want to stand up and cheer within your own home, and I did. It was just my wife and I but it felt so good for somebody in politics to finally say it. Donald Trump while speaking at the AIPAC Policy Conference in Washington DC on March 21st 2016 trashed the United Nations especially in reference to enforcing safety for the nation of Israel. I have been saying for years that the United States should withdraw support of the United Nations because of the lack of personal sovereignty that it intends to apply toward our own history—and given the amount of financial resources that America provides just to keep that token government operating with any kind of authority—it is clear that the UN has not appreciated it, and it has instead embolden them to believe that they are equal to the United States in global respect.
There are essentially three phases which defined the concept of American freedom. The first was of course the democratic invention of a pirate republic as established between the years of 1650 and 1710. For really the first time in known history people threw off the cloak of state ownership and declared themselves a free people as they made the hard decision to become pirates. There was a lot of debauchery that took place, and a lot of blood spilled, but the concept of pirating as it evolved in Port Royal, Jamaica caught the eye of John Locke who wrote down his thoughts which later inspired Thomas Paine and many others to break from England during the American Revolution. Without the Pirates of the Caribbean—literally, there would have never been a Declaration of Independence. Pirates had shown the colonists how a free country of sovereign citizens might throw off the tyranny of a king for the opportunity to live as a free people.
Of course the Revolution in America was the result of much contemplation within Scotland and other Illuminati circles that were going philosophically down a path for which the world would never be the same. Ben Franklin in particular, along with Thomas Jefferson drove much of that European contemplation into the new world to fan the flames of rebellion toward a free republic. It was hard for many to take up arms against the king of England but the result was a free nation in the New World. Once the smoke cleared and the frontier opened up mankind for the first time could look West and carve a life out for themselves using a method of economy called capitalism as communicated by Adam Smith into settling a rough frontier and allowing the best of them to become gloriously wealthy—proving the new economic theory to be more than justified by actuality. But first the European concept of slavery had to be ended and it was by the mid—1800s. Within America a war was fought and the slaves were freed—another first on the world stage. Only in America could a European inheritance such as slavery be eliminated with an emphasis on freedom for all people no matter what race or sex they might be.
Once the war was fought and the slaves were free the West opened up into what is my favorite period—westward expansion. The period of the Old West was a time where government was smallest, but the foundations of capitalism were running at its fullest—and the wealth created by this period essentially pushed up the skyscrapers of Manhattan and Chicago as railroads brought back great wealth from the West to the East. The concept of the frontiersman is a defining element of American capitalism. Most people failed, and many died of disease and personal misery—but a few managed to give rise to a nation on the backs of individual effort. The California Gold Rush fueled our young country with great wealth that made it the envy of the world—and it all occurred because individual people were empowered to carve out a life for themselves on the open land of the West if they dared. It wasn’t always pretty, but it was effective and is something to be very proud of as a period of adventure and honor which evolved on the backs of the American Cowboy.
The Roaring Twenties happened when the great president Calvin Coolidge promoted capitalism with great audacity and massive amounts of wealth generated from this entire American endeavor lifted up all members of society for the first time in human history—even the extreme poor benefited. Average people everywhere were living the kinds of lives that nobody on earth had thought possible just twenty years prior. Common people had access to food, jobs, and shelter as the spillover of capitalism from the very top provided a new security for everyone within the American experience. Several World Wars and other global wars against communism would take place in the years thereafter which were ultimately endeavored upon as a means to share the wealth of capitalism into countries drowning in communism—like Vietnam, Korea, China, Central America, Cuba, Mexico—and so on.
Then the audacious United Nations came in on the tail of all this work done in America—and all the blood spilled on behalf of endeavoring for personal freedom and assumed that it was their role to take control of all this activity and make the world into a melting pot of progressive value—ignoring the hard gains won in America for personal sovereignty—which was extremely disingenuous. Their version of a global government is a socialist one—and they are insisting that America give up its capitalism and embrace socialism so that they can more adequately manage us. So my hatred of the United Nations isn’t just some flimsy conspiracy theory—it is rooted in a firm knowledge of history and understanding how difficult it was for America to arrive at this point in time. It is also an awareness of how valuable it was for people within America to reach the kind of freedom that we have as a human rights endeavor. Americans are the masters of freedom and human rights—nobody else on earth has done as much as we have to make people free—and equal. People in America are equally allowed to reach as far as they dare. There is nothing to say that the journey will be easy—but they are free to reach no matter who they are—and that is something very special. So how dare the United Nations assume otherwise—and they have. That is why it was so refreshing to hear Donald Trump say what he did on such a large stage. If that is a hint into what kind of president he’ll be—he should win in a landslide! If I was a fan of his before—I am even more so now.
I say it a lot; I would never in a million years if given a chance go back in time to a period where I was younger. I love every year of my life and I regret nothing along the way. Yet with that said, I consider every new year to be like a graduation. You earn a reputation with age and wisdom that gives a guy like me the ability to do more. Donald Trump, because of a supportive father was able to jump into life with his natural gifts very early, so he didn’t have to suffer through much of what I’m about to say. But it has also positioned him uniquely to run for president with an amassed wealth that nobody could have understood which he has acquire during a lifetime. Now, I’ve also explained this too, because there is a very scientific reason that Donald Trump is wired the way he is, and why he’s successful. CLICK HERE FOR THAT FORMAL UNDERSTANDING. But for the purpose of this article, let’s just say that most people are stupid and they need certain things to navigate through life—from raising children to running a business. They are intellectually handicapped—likely by no fault of their own. People like Trump are a rarity—and when you meet one, you have to make special accommodations to utilize their very special talents. This is precisely why Donald Trump does not get into specifics when he identifies a problem. Below is a fascinating news story from Sky News which explores the Donald Trump phenomena from all fair sides which will help everyone understand along with this text why Trump is the perfect job applicant to run our American Republican—and also why nobody can outmaneuver him.
It has only been very recently—within the last six or seven years that the people who work with me have stopped asking for a “plan.” I am the kind of person who can’t stand being held down to the limits of a plan. Stupid people need plans—for me, they greatly encumber my thinking. I can walk out in front of any number of people and give a speech with no notes and speak for hours. I’m a person who can multitask at many levels with a wide array of people to accomplish a strategic objective. I take only random notes—usually only one or two word entries to remind me of things—but in general notes slow me down too much. I enjoy thinking on my feet quickly and dynamically—and increasingly it’s the only way that I will endeavor into something. Prior to these last few years I didn’t yet have a reputation that allowed me to say to very important people, “trust me,” and they would just do it. Investors, employers, politicians even family members want to know what the “plan” is. But I could never give it to them because I learned very early, that plans were not dynamic enough for reality. What is better is to understand the objective then trust your skills as a person to achieve the end result in spite of whatever obstacles present themselves as barriers to achievement. A banker certainly doesn’t understand that type of thinking—without a plan, they’d have a heart attack.
When I was a kid I got into a lot of fights. I was always the type who resisted the established authority of the masses, because to me, the people who formed that authority were not as smart as me. So why would I listen to them? I have a very long history of breaking the rules of collectivism with a complete disregard—and of course that has caused me to be in a lot of combative situations. For instance, when someone who is committed to collective enterprise is challenged in such a way they have no other recourse but violence to pull people into their way of thinking. As an example, way back in my early twenties my wife and I went to visit a friend of ours at his college fraternity. I didn’t recognize all the “brotherhood” rules of this “frat” house, I simply walked in—stepped across a seal they had on their sidewalk that supposedly meant war to anybody who did, and asked to see my friend who then took me around his fraternity house with my wife for a tour—which infuriated these structured little bastards. They were so angry with me being there with no regard for their rule driven little fraternity that they couldn’t contain themselves with anger after I left. But while I was there, they didn’t say or do anything. The reason was that I had been in many conflicts and people can read confidence in a person—and there was nothing for me to worry about, and it scared them. I showed no fear of them in the least and they didn’t understand how to “manage” me and it scared them.
The worst thing a fighter can do is go into a fight with a plan. If you think I’m going to do this, and he’s gonna’ do that, then the moment those things don’t happen—you’ll be lost and you’ll hold your feet into position too long and you’ll get pummeled by the other guy. You have to know and trust through your training that you can counter anything that anybody throws at you. Better yet, your only plan needs to be in beating the other guy—and like the great Bruce Lee, you have to be like water—to take any form to achieve the task. So you step into the ring, you watch what the other guy offers, then you take all your vast skills and utilize them anyway you can to come out on top and win the match. Early in my life, like 7 through 10 years of age if I had to fight someone after school—I worried about it all day—it made me absolutely miserable. But after you win a few times and get your confidence under your feet you begin to trust yourself and you realize that the other guy is often thinking in a very rigid way—which makes him easy to beat. He has in his mind how the fight is going to go and the moment you take that away from him—he is on a path to losing. By the time I was around 13 to 16 I had mastered the confidence to trust myself in any situation and could think quickly on the balls of my feet. I’d get into these fights with a formlessness that gave me great liberty in achieving victory, and it worked great. By then, if I had a fight after school I was actually able to enjoy myself free of worry. For instance, even though the result was very tragic, CLICK HERE TO REVIEW, leading up to it should have been very scary. Before a big fight, I was supposed to fight three guys at once at a very menacing location. These boys had spread the rumor that they were going to literally kill me and it was all over school. Before the fight, I went to see a girl I liked and spent time at her house before picking up some friends and going to see Nightmare on Elm Street at the theater and having a really good time—for some it might have been the best time of their lives—even still. For me it was just another day in my life—but for them it was the stuff of the best movie they had ever seen. I was very loose and happy–sincerely enjoying my life. I was 16-years old at the time and had reached my peak for that kind of thing, and the results were tragic for the other people—which was regretful. But the point of the matter was that I knew what the objective was going to be and I had a very loose plan on how to achieve it. Reality presented a whole host of variables that I had to work around—but in the end I achieved my objectives in spite of the obstacles.
I’ve had the same approach in just about everything in my life. I’ve had some really stupid people that have worked over me try to intimidate my style into falling in compliance with the way they understand things—and I have never complied. After watching me for years they are no closer today to understanding how or why I do things and why those things turn out so well than they were in the beginning. I don’t take many notes, I don’t seek the counsel of other people—I don’t ask advice about anything—because why would I? I trust myself in every situation. I don’t need to be guided or steered in any way. Now that I’m older people have learned to just shut up and do what I tell them to, and things always work out for them. If they don’t listen—then I just drop them and go do something else. But working in collaboration, or in shared partnerships—forget about it. It doesn’t work and I don’t have any interest in those types of things unless I’m 100% free to do it my way exclusively. Of course I have great communication skills so I give people the same respect that I expect and they can thrive as well—but it takes time for people to understand how to trust me. Without a reputation to go on—which no young person has—it’s hard for people who don’t think in these fashions to understand how to deal with a guy like me.
I see in Donald Trump many of the same traits—reading The Art of the Deal he introduces himself as a multitasker who doesn’t take notes and is quick on his feet. He is certainly a fighter in his own right that is similar to me in the way that he thinks. Trump was fortunate to have a father who didn’t try to crush that spirit out of him. Basically Trump was given a good million dollar loan after proving himself early in life to make his way in the Big Apple. Of course things worked out for him and he exploded into the kind of person that he is now. But essentially, he is a street fighter who squeezed the most out of the opportunities that were presented to him. Most people are not as smart as he is—they are functionally stupid because they don’t understand how he works—so they ridicule his talents for a lack of understanding. It is odd for me to watch him go through this campaign process because he is a person at the top of his game who is now being scrutinized by a very static political system with the dynamism that infuriates virtually everyone—from voters all the way down to the staunchest supporter of the political establishment. I would not want to do what he’s doing because it would be infuriating to deal with so many stupid people. Even getting into his nice 757 airplane you really can’t forget the dumb people around you who just don’t get it. Donald Trump knows how to make America great again—but he also knows that it will be a fight and the path to get there isn’t known. What he does understand is that no matter what anybody throws at him—that he can counteract it, and that he will be successful in his objectives—whether it’s building a border wall, or improving the economy. Unfortunately, most people need a rigid plan to understand how to get there and in politics—the system has been designed as a collective enterprise—which by nature is functionally deficient. I trust Trump because I trust myself. Politics will never be the same after his run—that is for sure—but it pains me to watch him be scrutinized by people who clearly aren’t of the same caliber as he is. I know how painful it is and he is doing it on such a large scale that it has to be difficult. But I’m glad that he’s willing to do it—because it will take someone like him to pull off the job. Things are so messed up globally that it will take such a mind with the kind of resources he has to have a chance of fixing things. But a rigid plan will never get us there—and thankfully, Trump supporters have a good instinct to know that something special is going on even if they don’t quite understand it. That is the clear message in the news report above—and is the key to understanding Donald Trump and his vision for America which will actually benefit everyone in some way or another toward a destiny only he and a few others can see. But he can’t put it down on paper for stupid people to see—because they’ll never understand.
