It is unbelievable that so many establishment types had a hard time with Ben Carson’s speech at the RNC in Cleveland where he tied Hillary Clinton to Lucifer. I think I was most baffled by Dana Parino from Fox News who thought it was an “over-the-top” comparison. No wonder Republicans have been losing to the inferior philosophical outlook of the political left for such a long time—because they avoid confronting evil even in words and deeds. There was nothing “inflammatory” or “conspiratorial” about what Ben Carson said—everything is factually based. Watch for yourself.
It is true that Hillary idolized Saul Alinsky and wrote here college thesis on the radical leftist who did indeed study his methods of organizing change agents from within the ranks of Al Capone’s criminal empire. His associations with known mobsters led to his pinnacle work—the Democratic handbook, Rules for Radicals which Hillary was very enchanted with—and on the dedication page, Alinsky did dedicate the book to Lucifer—literally. The book was forged from evil and organized crime. Fact. There is nothing “inflammatory” about it such a statement. It’s all true. You’d think that even Republican insiders who actually have worked in the White House would know that. But what they do when they criticize Carson for bringing up such an extraordinary fact about a person running for president of the United States is they play right into the methods Saul Alinsky taught his students—that the best way for evil to thrive is to force good people to shut up and sit down with all known methods of coercion—which is how the mob operated for years—and still does in some places.
Ben did a good job in bringing up the Hillary comparison to Lucifer at the RNC because it is relevant to this situation. The first method of breaking an addiction is in admitting that you have a problem. Republicans have been addicted to losing for a long time to the sheer face of evil—by not challenging that evil when confronted with it. Republicans have turned away from the workings of evil like timid varmints about to be consumed by a vile snake trapped on a high perch for which they can never step off to escape. The snake knows that Republicans cannot step off their high ground so they use that fear to control the thinking of Republicans and have used that strategic imposition to essentially spread evil in the vacancy of justice. That is essentially what Rules for Radicals teaches and what more could you expect from a book dedicated to Lucifer.
For the recorded the communists in the following video calling Alex Jones and his entourage “nazi scum” need a history lesson. Hitler and his Nazis were socialist offshoots of a secret society called Vril based on the book The Coming Race. Nothing about the Nazi has any relevance to American life other than the fact that many of those Vril inspired Nazis were recruited into NASA’s space program because of what they were working on under the SS during World War II. Yet, Jones was correct in what he was asserting and a clash erupted between his group and the communist supporters protesting outside of the Republican National Convention. What you are about to see is what’s happening outside the mainstream news outlet coverage and defines quite well the massive void that currently takes place along political lines. The obvious determination that is so evident in this exchange is that communist insurgents really can’t assimilate into American culture. We can’t all live together in one country under the umbrella of two parties. It’s just not possible.
It is unlikely that the main press outlets will show all the chants inside and outside the convention for Hillary Clinton to go to prison. This is certainly a first for any presidential candidate to evoke so much passion before they have ever taken an oath of official office. It is truly astonishing how determined the mainstream press is at avoiding the coverage of such legal demands for someone who is obviously a known criminal running for the highest office in the world. Currently there are just enough communist sympathizers to give someone like Hillary Clinton a platform that is fundamentally anti-American—but it is truly bothersome to see that many of those sympathizers are in our national media. Those media personalities are just as ignorant, and activist minded toward communist sympathies as the losers in the video attacking Alex Jones.
Now this is the way an American president should enter an RNC convention—and this is also how a first lady should look and behave. This is what I expect out of my representatives and why I have been for Donald Trump from the start. But the important stuff that has been happening has not been part of most of the media broadcasts and many of them involve the Alex Jones portion of the Republican Party. Probably the two best things from day one of the Republican Convention in Cleveland, Ohio 2016 was the “Hillary For Prison” banner flying over the entire city and Jones confronting establishment Bush Republican, Karl Rove at the airport baggage claim—who has been anti-Trump fervently.
Then of course there is Dinesh D’Souza showing off his new movie, Hillary’s America and suddenly as you look around the convention and it is obvious that Republicans are finally starting to stick up for themselves—and that is what the media is not reporting on any outlet. It starts with Trump’s entrance on stage and ends with people like Alex Jones fighting with Karl Rove at the airport. So here are some videos of that first day which paints a picture everyone should see of a new Republican Party emerging with a vengeance.
The Nathan Drake adventures on the Playstation game systems have reminded me often of my experiences from 1983 through 1988. I love the games and the character of Nathan Drake. Up until recently I thought Uncharted 2: Among Thieves was one of the greatest video games ever made. The video game company Naughty Dog actually did something unthinkable, they are challenging great movie characters like Indiana Jones for the right to be king of the storytelling venue, and up until Uncharted 4: A Thieves End—which just came out in May of 2016 I thought they were scratching the surface. However, I have given myself some time recently to play the 4th game, with great anticipation on my part. Even though in my life I have shelved many of the traits about Nathan Drake’s life which remind me so much of my early years I deeply wanted to see how Naughty Dog would end the story of that very likable character—as this is slated to be the end of the series as we know it. After playing Uncharted 4 let me report that it is jaw dropping great. I had high expectations but even so, it far exceeded those in every way. By the time the credits concluded I had a very similar feeling as I did the very first time I saw Raiders of the Lost Ark, only this was better, because the game was much longer and had time to jump into the lives of the characters in a storytelling fashion that I think was Academy Award winning. The acting and pacing was so good that it rivals the best films Hollywood has ever produced—like Citizen Kane for set design and drama, or James Bond for sheer action and scope of circumstance. As just an example of how good the game is, how it looks and how magnificent it is the video below is actual game play. It looks like a movie but I can confirm that everything you see is a playable element. It is quite astonishing.
If you have not yet played the game you may want to return to this article once you have as spoilers will follow. I thought there were a number of elements about Uncharted 4 that were quite extraordinary story wise, and those items will be discussed—so if you don’t want to know, stop here.
Was I happy with the ending? Actually, I was amazed by the ending. It was so refreshing, that an entertainment company actually produced a story that featured strong characters with healthy relationships. It was good to see that Nate and his wife actually lived happily ever after—that the events of the previous games were really about Nathan Drake coming to terms with his past and living a healthy future. And it was nice to see that they gave birth to a daughter who was living a successful life with them. Nathan Drake managed to also maintain positive relationships with his brother and his father figure mentor Sully as the years after Uncharted 4 progressed. It was the happiest ending I’ve seen since the conclusion of the very first Back to the Future movie—it was satisfying in every way. My wife and I kind of looked at each other after the story concluded because honestly it was like Naughty Dog had been spying on our own lives together over the years even down to the characters of the new daughters. I was certainly able to relate to the ending—to say the least. I was so pleased that millions of video game players were able to experience these Nathan Drake adventures which featured such positive role models and outcomes. No wonder the game is so popular—the ending showed me that video games have become the dominate form of storytelling in our modern culture surpassing movies and novels finally. In a lot of ways Uncharted 4 is the greatest story ever told—it is certainly the greatest treasure hunt surpassing Raiders of the Lost Ark or even Humphrey Bogart’s Treasure of Sierra Madre. The people at Naughty Dog knew what they were doing and they pulled it off with sheer audacity. Such a good ending to the story of Nathan Drake—especially for those who have spent the last ten years enjoying the Uncharted franchise. Hollywood would have never dared to give fans such a positive ending.
What started as a rip off of the Tomb Raider franchise—which was a female rip-off of Indiana Jones, Uncharted had evolved into its own thing by the third video game. Even the makers of the Tomb Raider games had realized that Uncharted was literally going someplace nobody had thought previously possible. So by the time Naughty Dog set out to do Uncharted 4, they were truly in “uncharted” territory for any storytelling medium. The game designers appeared to be aware that they were laying foundations that every video game and movie company in the future would have to live up to and they were enjoying it. There were times where they were actually showing off their technical abilities just because they could.
Libertalia was very interesting in that it actually fits politically into the discussion of our times—really the philosophic difference between libertarians, and the Tea Party movement. What a lot of people don’t know is that the American Revolution was ignited by the actions of these very pirates central to the Uncharted 4 story so I consider the narrative an important one which shaped the actual Libertalia which become America. But for the founders of Libertalia, what a concept, a utopian paradise founded by renegades from all the world governments and all the possible problems that might arise from it. I found the entire concept extremely compelling. Then to walk around that environment in a 3D world was really something to behold. The sense of scale was truly incredible. These Uncharted makers obviously have experience with real world adventures as their physics through caves, with rappelling and climbing and geography was spot on—nearly real world in their feel. If not for some of the over-the-top gun battles, and climbing, Uncharted 4 could be a simulation of real life.
It’s really hard to pick a favorite part of the game for me, because after I was finished, it seemed like a really long journey. I took my time getting through the game—spending about three weekends completing it. Ironically, I think the chapter where Nathan and his brother break into the old mansion to get back their mother’s personal possessions was the most compelling, which I didn’t expect. Nathan’s mother supposedly committed suicide when he was very young forcing him to grow up in an orphanage run by nuns. Uncharted 4 opens with Drake and his brother in a Panamanian jail and it is very gritty. Through the series Drake is in many jails yet he’s highly intelligent walking a very fine line between ghetto thug and world-class traveler. So it was interesting and realistic to learn that Nathan’s mother was a genius scholar who had obviously brushed elbows with powerful people and something bad happened to her. Her absence in the lives of her children obviously sent them down a dark path leaving them with relationship troubles later in their lives as they had been a relatively happy family. As young children that happiness was ripped from them and they spent the rest of their days trying to get it back which culminated around the secret treasure of Henry Avery—a character of obsession for their mother. I thought that the Naughty Dog team went so much further than Spielberg could in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in taking such an interesting globetrotting adventurer and grounding him into something internally driven by overbearing parents and childhood disappointments. Even in the Panamanian jail, Drake and his brother seem too smart for their circumstances, but psychologically damaged by their upbringing. Apparently they got just enough from their mother to be smart and inquisitive young people, but not enough to stay out of trouble. The story was to me, deeply intelligent.
And that is the triumph of Uncharted 4, not just as a Playstation only video game, but as a mechanism for storytelling. It is a shame that such a magnificent story doesn’t have the ability to reach everyone, but it certainly does justify the expense of buying a PS4 just so that people can play this video game. It is worth every penny the cost of not only the game at $60 dollars, but the $300 cost of a PS4. I haven’t played many of these types of games over the last five or six years. Previous favorites were Red Dead Redemption and of course Star Wars: The Old Republic. But this Uncharted game is just another step in creating virtual realities and telling stories in those realms. Recently after buying a Samsung 4K 70” television the first thing I wanted to do was get an updated gaming system so I could catch up on some of the new titles that have been produced in the video game world. The highest on my list was Uncharted 4 which was coming up at the time. With that said, the game was gorgeous blown up big and in 4K—nearly flawless. It really was a game that hit every mark on a high note and was something truly to behold and enjoy. If you get the chance, take the adventure. It’s not the only reason I spent 5K on an entertainment system, but I would do it again just to play Uncharted 4 once. It will last in your mind for a lifetime. It is my new favorite video game, and one of my most beloved adventure stories. It has the depth of an adventure novel, the action of a summer blockbuster, and the romance of an Academy Award winning motion picture. I really don’t think Douglas Fairbanks or Errol Flynn could have ever imagined the type of storytelling exhibited in Uncharted 4. It is a new gold standard that will certainly stand the test of time and is one of the greatest adventure stories EVER told. What a great experience Naughty Dog! Thanks!
Do yourself a favor and watch the videos included above. The effort put into Uncharted 4 is just incredible, and it certainly shows—an A+ in every single category.
Newt Gingrich had it wrong when he suggested that any Muslim in America be deported if they practice Sharia Law. He didn’t go far enough because Muslims that practice Sharia are not the only villains on the world stage. As I write this more police officers have been killed in an ambush in Baton Rouge by members of the black community incited to hatred by the race baiters they follow. What many people don’t want to admit is that all these terrorist issues, the domestic ones who are openly calling for assassinating police so that the federal government can take over localized departments, and the ISIS related radicals both overseas and within our borders, is that they all trace back to some radical form of Islam—which has quite a powerful hook into the lives of many “African-American” people—particularly in inner city communities. That is certainly the case of Louis Farrakhan, who you can hear below speak to his congregation who is the leader of the Nation of Islam, which was established many years ago in Detroit, Michigan. He still speaks to many in a manner that isn’t all the different from the ISIS practice of Sharia. Listen for yourself.
The main belief of the NOI and its followers is that there is no other God but Allah. They teach that their founder, Master Fard Muhammad is the Mahdi.[26] The official beliefs of the NOI have been outlined in books, documents, and articles published by the organization, and in speeches by Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X, Farrakhan, and other ministers. Many of Elijah Muhammad’s teachings may be found in Message to the Blackman in America and The True History of Jesus as Taught by the Honorable Elijah Muhammad.[27]
Written lessons from 1930 to 1934 were passed from W. Fard Muhammad to his student, Elijah Muhammad. These were collected and entitled The Supreme Wisdom. The NOI continues to teach its followers that the present world society is segmented into three distinct categories. They teach that from a general perspective, 85% of the population are the “deaf, dumb and blind” masses of the people who “are easily led in the wrong direction and hard to lead in the right direction”. Those 85% of the masses are said to be manipulated by 10% of the people. Those 10% rich “slave-makers” are said to manipulate the 85% masses of the people through ignorance, the skillful use of religious doctrine, and the mass media. The third group is referred to as the 5% “poor righteous teachers” of the people of the world, who know the truth of the manipulation of the 85% masses of the people by the 10%. The 5% “righteous teachers” are at constant struggle and war with the 10% to reach and “free the minds” of the masses of the people.
An official Nation of Islam platform referred to as “The Muslim Program” was written by Elijah Muhammad in his book Message to the Blackman in America (1965). The itemized platform contains two sections; “What The Muslims Want”, consisting of 10 points; and “What The Muslims Believe”, consisting of 12 points.[26]
I really don’t care where people come from or what their skin color is. Personally, I love people from other countries because they often love their experience in America—they work hard because they get to keep what they make and they appreciate life in the United States. Indians, Mexicans, Asians, people from regions of Africa are damn hard workers and I can claim to have personal affiliations with all those groups presently. But my policy is that if they are in America, they better honor our flag. If they think they are going to change America into something resembling where they came from—like the Mexican flag, or some flag in Congo—they have another thing coming. And certainly, Louis Farrakhan is guilty of demanding that African-Americans attending his speeches fight against “western civilization.” They are not advocates of capitalism. They do not like the United States and its history. They seek openly to inspire their members within the Nation of Islam to fight against the traditions of America with the same zeal that ISIS demands of their members to practice Sharia. Up until present, the Nation of Islam had not been involved in open killings, but if you peel back the root cause of uprisings within black communities—behind “Black Lives Matters—the communists behind that movement—you will find members of the Nation of Islam fanning the flames of domestic terrorism, then when the arrows of guilt point in their direction—they throw up accusations of racism to hide their actions.
What Louis is advocating is essentially anti-western, culturally, and not the assimilation of blacks into American culture. You might take special note of his example of an “uncle Tom” as played by Samual Jackson in the liberal film Django Unchained. If a man or woman of any color wants to dress up in a suit and dine at the finest restaurants I don’t care where they come from or what religion they practice. They should put their napkins in their laps and say think you in complete sentences to those around them the way everyone else does—because those are attributes of American culture. If a bunch of thugs however want to walk into such a nice restaurant with their pants pulled down halfway and are covered in body piercings, they will be justifiably scrutinized because they are attacking the proper culture of such a nice establishment. When Louis Farrakhan preaches to his congregations that they should not assimilate with white culture and read the books of the “white man” or marry and have children the way “white men” do, he is advocating that his members fight against assimilation with American culture. The Nation of Islam is not interested in assimilation, just as ISIS isn’t interested in peace—they are only interested in advocating change—change from a capitalist culture to a more socialist one and that makes them all potential domestic terrorists who should be scrutinized based on the observations of recent violence.
So it’s not correct to just look at Muslims who practice Sharia Law if you want to stop all these terrorist events—you must attack the lack of desire of Muslims in America from assimilating to the culture for which they reside. If a Muslim wants to practice that religion they certainly can, and they don’t have to be deported just because of their faith. But they better live by the rules of our nation and honor the flag we fly as their new country of origin. If they intend to change something about America—then they are not “assimilating” and that makes them tyrants toward our Constitutional Republic. You can’t attack terrorism if you don’t attack the cause and in the case of global terrorism whether its race relations within America or terrorism in Europe and the Middle East—they all have some radical version of Islam to blame. And that should tell you something.
All this violence has a cause, and it all points back to Islam in some form or another. For more about the shooter, Gavin Long–click here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3694441/Masked-gunman-shoots-multiple-cops-Baton-Rouge-two-weeks-video-officers-killing-Alton-Sterling-dead-provoked-outrage.html
By the way, I know many of the people who were at the $2,700 a plate dinner which was conducted before the Sharonville rally, and take heart that it was well attended. Trump has no trouble with either large or small dollar donations.
Rich —
Ohio Trump Victory is rolling in the Buckeye State and we will be participating in the National Day of Action. We will be Walking TOMORROW at various locations throughout Ohio. Please click the link to sign up for the nearest location or where you would like to walk tomorrow:
Watching the special session of congressional investigation into the James Comey FBI ruling on the Hillary Clinton email problems the essence is this—Comey felt that the Attorney General history over 99 years of patterned behavior that a case of this nature would not have been taken under the presumption of “intent.” Everything else said is irrelevant. It was obvious that Comey felt that Clinton had done a bad job of protecting her secure emails as Secretary of State and that she seriously jeopardized her credibility. Yet he did not advance the recommendation of prosecution because he felt the case was too flimsy for an AG at a Department of Justice to proceed with.
Here’s the problem with Comey’s statement—attorney generals are extremely political so their prosecution ratios if the charges are leveled toward characters on their political side of the aisle are of course extremely poor. It is no surprise that Comey made the political calculation that his case was not strong enough to by-pass the politics of the AG, Loretta Lynch. Yet, on Friday, July 1st Loretta Lynch under pressure from the disgrace of her meeting with Bill Clinton—Hillary’s husband—she stated clearly that she would accept any recommendation that the FBI proposed. So it goes on July 5th 2016 James Comey held a press conference stating that the FBI would not bring charges against Hillary Clinton because they could not prove that she “intended” to break the law. (Because all that evidence had been destroyed by Hillary’s team of lawyers)
When pressed by the congressional investigation specially held under an emergency session on July 7th 2016 however, Comey fell on the historical tendency of prosecution under the DOJ over a long period of time as the reason he did not recommend prosecution—even though Loretta Lynch already stated that she would proceed. So there was no question that the Department of Justice would proceed with the case which is contrary to Comey’s statements defending his position. That is the key to this case. Comey in spite of all his declarations about the importance of his integrity lied about his reasons for not moving forward with the prosecution. The DOJ would have had no choice but to pursue the case because Bill and Loretta Lynch got caught together in an inappropriate way.
Hey, how do I know these things you ask? Well, I recently stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. I’ve read a little law and I deal with lawyers more than I’d care to. Gotta’ watch how they twist the meanings of words.
Hillary Clinton is guilty as hell. For the specifics of why, watch Rudy Giuliani speak on Fox News about how his former assistant, James Comey—Director of the FBI was wrong in not bringing charges against the vile criminal, presidential candidate, and former secretary of state who caused the debacle seen in the movie, 13 Hours.
Comey was caught between a rock and a hard place. He put the case out for prosecution, but also understands that the powers that control his job want Hillary to be the president and those powers will go to the extent to kill those in their way. Just watch Dinesh D’Souza’s new movie, Hillary’s America coming out in theaters soon to see evidence of that. Comey certainly put politics into his decision—likely for self preservation. But without doubt, Hillary Clinton is guilty and is incompetent to hold any public office, especially the POTUS position. Comey was weak—but the facts are self evident.
I know a lot of people in America don’t pay much attention to politics outside of North America. Heck, there are a lot of people who don’t even go that far—so they have no idea really what is going on with this whole Brexit issue. Let me introduce you dear reader to a real man from England who walked into the lion’s den in Brussels over 17 years ago to fight the EU from the outset. After the British people voted to leave the European Union Nigel Farage spoke to that disastrous body of government here:
Once the speech had concluded he spoke to CNN and compared the situation in England to that within the United States. Listen and learn.
Now pass this along to a friend and teach them something about the world and what’s coming to us all. Find your place in history and hang on tight.
I didn’t comment right away on the Benghazi Committee report released on June 28th 2016, because I wanted to read the report first. So I took a good part of the day to read it, all 800 pages. I read a lot, it took me many hours, but it was worth it. Sadly, most of the news agencies out there, including the AP wire published their responses within minutes of Trey Gowdy’s release of all their hard work. The press’s main concern was in insuring that Hillary Clinton was off the hook so that the report wouldn’t harm her run for the American presidency. I would urge you dear reader to go through that report for yourself. The link is below. I would also urge you to listen to the Rush Limbaugh podcast which occurred during the release. It was a good show that describes very acutely the current dramatic split between the American political right, and the global oriented political left. The two are not compatible and the evidence is rather grotesque. Do yourself a favor, read the report, listen to the entire Rush Limbaugh episode, and consider where you stand in it all.
My take on the report is that it shows just how terrible political correctness has become in American politics. Our military was ineffective and entirely too concerned about what Libya might think of their presence. Clinton’s foreign policy as Secretary of State for the Obama administration was terrible. Obama himself with Leon Panetta totally mismanaged the entire situation and people died. Libya was their creation, the anxiety was the result of their doing, everything about the entire situation was a result of failed leftist policy led by the Obama administration. I can’t say that what they did was malicious. After reading the Benghazi report it is obvious that a lot of people had good intentions, including Obama’s people, but that they were just too stupid to conduct the situation correctly and what we have learned is that those types of people should be removed from all government positions. I don’t think they can even live correctly in America because they don’t value it, and therefore cannot do what is necessary every day to keep it a great place to live. In other words if the god damn hippies of yesteryear want to smoke pot and life in a welfare state, they should move to Amsterdam. They should not expect to transform America into some European hell hole. If they want to change America into something else, they should leave. We’d all be happier living apart from each other.
We are at an impasse in America that is quite different from any other period in history. Even during the Revolutionary War, the Patriots had things in common with the Tories—they at least shared a love for the homeland. They both wanted to live a good life. Most of them shared a common religion and could at least be civil to one another while at the local tavern. During the Civil War, the North and the South were both descendents of the brave people who settled America from Europe. They wanted a good life, but disagreed over the issue of slavery—which evolved under the American Constitution. After the war, the two sides were able to reconcile to some extent and continue building the greatest nation on earth. But now, the difference between the traditional conservatives and the globalist liberals are too great. The two sides do not share much of anything. One side wants to preserve the greatness of America, the other side wants to steal it away and give it away to the rest of the world only to be consumed like a log on a raging fire—lost forever after the violence of initial heat has died.
It is obvious that we are at war and only one side can stay in the United States. The two political philosophies cannot share the government oversight of a strong nation–because they are too divided on basic values. The people who quickly rushed to judgment about this Benghazi report seeking to protect Hillary Clinton for purely ideological reasons are the enemy. They are the domestic enemies that we all swear to protect America from and they are here, in our schools teaching our kids, they are running our institutions, they run our government, and they are running our media from entertainment, music, and the press. They are here to destroy our nation and their handiwork is all over the Benghazi report. What happened in Libya is what we are all headed for. They don’t belong in America. They’d be happier in Europe so it’s probably time we force them to leave our shores for our own preservation so they can live among others of their own kind. There is no middle ground on this issue. The political right and the left cannot live together. That is what I learned by reading the Benghazi Committee report.
