On a positive note, Right Side Broadcasting interviewed people during the Donald Trump rally in Toledo, Ohio recently–the same day that Hillary gave her acceptance speech at the DNC. The contrast to the garbage that we saw in Philadelphia couldn’t be more obvious. You can listen to some of those people below. What is interesting is that wherever Trump goes, there are these tremendous, passionate people. Does anybody think that Hillary Clinton could fill arenas like this one in Toledo and bring out such articulate supporters? I don’t.
Just the week of the DNC Trump has given an average of three major speeches each day across the entire country and everywhere he goes there are these giant crowds filled with enthusiastic people. Trump is outworking Hillary Clinton in every way and now that the conventions are out of the way, it will be “entertaining” to watch her attempt to catch up to Trump. Hillary could only hope to have one rally like the one he had in Toledo—let alone to do three of those each day in different parts of the country. Trump doesn’t need a ground game of zombie-like supporters—because he is the ground game. He shows up himself and in that fashion–his method is much more powerful, and persuasive.
This is what happens when people who come from different places around the world, or adhere to values that are not fundamentally “American” find themselves in positions to rule over others.
LOS ANGELES — A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled Thursday that the Second Amendment of the Constitution does not guarantee the right of gun owners to carry concealed weapons in public, upholding a California law that imposes stringent conditions on who may be granted a concealed-carry permit.
The 7-to-4 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, overturned a decision by a three-judge panel of the same court and was a setback for gun advocates. The California law requires applicants to demonstrate “good cause” for carrying a weapon, like working in a job with a security threat — a restriction sharply attacked by gun advocates as violating the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
“Based on the overwhelming consensus of historical sources, we conclude that the protection of the Second Amendment — whatever the scope of that protection may be — simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public,” the court said in a ruling written by Judge William A. Fletcher.
Those judges voting against the Second Amendment of course are wrong. Guns in American culture are like pasta to Italians, rice to Asians, Fish & Chips to the British, arm pit hair for the French, feathers to the Indian, or piñatas to the Mexicans. It is disrespectful to come to America and proclaim that guns should be removed from our culture. There is nothing wrong with people from other countries coming to America to live the American dream, but it is wrong for them to seek to change anything about the freest country on earth with the garbage they ran from in the first place. It is in that spirit of “change” that Judge William A. Fletcher provided the ruling reflecting the 7-4 decision.
All I can say to those people is that if they don’t understand the language of the 2nd Amendment then perhaps we need another revolution where we can make it a bit clearer for them. Because that is the only path that is acceptable—removing guns from America just isn’t with incremental rulings against the 2nd Amendment to reshape our culture. California is showing that immigration has destroyed its heritage as a sovereign state within America. And they intend to infect the rest of our country with the same strategy. That is of course why we should all carry guns—everywhere.
I think it was way back in August of 2015 that I said I’d considered not contributing articles everyday like I do presently if Donald Trump were elected president—mainly because his presence in the race for the White House, or from the White House does much of what I have been doing with all this work. Well, after tonight’s performance in the East and the strong showing once again in five more states with clear indications of a strong finish in the biggest of all, California—it is clear that Donald Trump should be the Republican nominee for POTUS in 2016. Even with the silly little Kasich/Cruz alliance, the only hope they have is to get to a floor fight at the convention to be president—which won’t go over well as it goes against the popular vote. A lot of people never got over the Bush/Gore tie in 2000 where technically Gore won the popular vote, but Bush won the electoral votes. This Trump situation is much more flammable than even that, so I don’t see anybody but Trump running as a Republican against Hillary Clinton. And as for Hillary, she barely beat Bernie Sanders. She won’t be able to withstand a focused attack by Donald Trump every day. He will simply outwork her, and she won’t win a general election. So for all practical purposes, Donald Trump will be the next President of the United States.
I am an excellent judge of character and it may take five or six years for others within the Republican ranks to see what I do in Trump, but history will agree with me. Conservatives are not going to win major elections trying to shift the country radically back to the political right after 100 years of liberal erosion—so you have to pick your battles. Trump is all about the economy, border security, and trade negotiations—which is an excellent place to begin. Real conservatives need to keep their eye on 2024 for all the social issues. You have to fix the economy first and sustain the integrity of our sovereignty before we worry about guys wanting to use the restrooms of girls. These are all big issues but moral depravity escalates when people don’t have money in their pockets. Morality is a lot easier to sell when people have something of value that they appreciate—and right now—we just don’t have that type of society.
Trump from the White House will utilize the power of positive thinking to unlock America’s potential. It won’t be Trump’s policies that do it—it will be his mouth and charisma, and I see a path where he can do a lot more from the White House than the slow trickle that I perform with all my articles trying to teach people to do the same thing in their private lives. The next four to eight years will be a whirlwind and situations will change—and a chapter of our lives will close as a new one begins. That means I need to shift my personal role as well.
I have talked prior about a rather epic novel that I’m working on and I have been flushing out the ideas for quite some time. The articles on this site have played a part of that. But now it’s time to put pen to paper and to pound out the manuscripts. Rather than write the 1200 to 1500 words each day that I do here, my efforts need to go into that commercial work. It’s not the writing itself that is the challenge, it’s the editing and working out the details that takes all the time and that is where I’m going to put my focus at this point That’s not to say that I won’t make any more contributions—I certainly will. But as for the daily articles, it is time to let the chain reaction that many of us in this marketplace have set forth to do their thing and to move to the next phase as we see it.
My path is clear and it will take everything I have to get there. It’s certainly time for me to make this decision. I’ve delayed my indulgence for about a year because of all the volatility at the presidential level. It is hard for people to imagine that one guy like Donald Trump might have such a large impact on our culture but I’d ask those who can remember to recollect the difference between 1979 and 1980. I think the switch from 2016 to 2017 will be much greater and there will be so much news flashing by in such a whirlwind that nobody will be able to keep up. Meanwhile, I have quite an encyclopedia of articles here to help people through that phase and to guide them into making the correct decisions. My next role will be context through art—not in the definition of interpretation—which is what I’ve been doing. Now we need the artistic effort to expand culture and that will be my new focus. For me the work will be similar, I will write everyday toward a known objective—only people won’t see it as they do now. They’ll see it in bulk when the projects are released. For me it is the work of the Great American Novel, something I have been thinking about for quite a long time. How that novel gets published I’m not sure at this time—because that industry has changed so much. But first, you just have to write it then measure how best to distribute it.
As for Donald Trump, I know his people have read here and I hope this site continues to be a source of inspiration. But it’s time for the student to leave the classroom and to utilize what they’ve learned—and I expect that to be the case for everybody—even those silent lurkers who depend heavily on my written words. I’m not going away—I’m just turning inward so that I can build up to the next great phase which we will see a few years from now. When we get there—we all need to be ready and I need to focus on getting it right. I am proud to have played my part in all the multiple fissures that are emerging along the front of establishment debacles. I consider all this a major mission concluded even if people aren’t aware of the explosions and dawn has not yet revealed all the damage.
Trump winning against the establishment—and I consider Cruz part of the establishment—the church wielding branch—I see an open window for a reiteration of the American idea in much the way that Henry Morgan led the pirates of the Caribbean toward the first free establishment of a constitutional republic without the influence of a king. I’m not saying that it will be a moral quest, but it will get us where we want to go as a country among the world. The situation is complicated beyond measure, but ultimately the power of positive thinking will go a long way to getting us there. So enjoy the victory for those riding the Trump train. For those not yet there, see you when you arrive. It might take a while but I trust that you’ll arrive in your own way in your own time. And as for this site, this won’t be the last article. But they won’t come as often as my focus will be on more commercial material—because that’s what’s needed at this point in time. When the smoke clears—all this will make a lot more sense.
I don’t like Sean Payton, the head coach of the New Orleans Saints football team, mostly because I’m a Tampa Bay Buccaneer fan. I think he runs a dirty organization as was the evidence of his one year suspension a few seasons ago, and I think he leads a team of thugs. That could be said of many NFL teams, but when a coach like Payton exploits that thug culture to squeeze out a few more wins for his own personal advancement I think he opens himself up to an extra level of scrutiny when something goes wrong. And when an ex-star player of his, Will Smith was gunned down in the street on April 9th 2016 Payton didn’t blame the football players involved for their very bad behavior leading up to the tragedy—he blamed guns and took a progressive position socially to camouflage the failure of a culture which he has helped create—and that makes him a scum bag.
Former Saints DE Will Smith and his wife were out for a night dining with friends. One of those friends just happened to be a cop who was involved in a shooting of the father of Smith’s future murderer—later that evening—ironically. Smith had friends in law enforcement and he was a star football player and Super Bowl champion—so he had a sense of entitlement based on his behavior. He was doing good things with his life and looked to be a good family man. He had celebrity friends and was the star of whatever event he attended. All was well until he started driving home and accidentally bumped into the very expensive Hummer driven by Cardell Hayes.
After Cardell Hayes lost his father to a police shooting the city of New Orleans paid the minor league football player a hefty sum of money for which he purchased a bright red Hummer. It didn’t sit well with the football player to be rear ended on a late night Saturday while stopped in the road. Hayes moved toward the sidewalk to get out of the way of traffic and settle the matter with the driver who hit him. But instead of pulling up behind to exchange insurance information, like what was supposed to happen by law, and call the police to file a report, the car driven by Smith ran off invoking a hit and run incident. Well, being a young football player who has had to scrap for everything on every play to get what he needs in life, watching that car run from the scene of the accident was apparently too much for Hayes who gunned off in pursuit of the fleeing vehicle. It was unlikely known at the time that it was the famous Will Smith who had hit him and whom Hayes was chasing. All Hayes knew was that someone had committed a crime against him and he was going to get the guy. What Hayes should have done was write down the license plate number. He would have had his justice and everyone would still be alive. But instead Hayes torpedoed his car into Smith at a traffic light several blocks up the road and the two drivers met on the street for an angry brawl. One thing led to another and before anybody realized how serious the situation was, Hayes shot Smith in the chest six times killing the New Orleans football star.
Hayes stayed on the scene and admitted what he had done to police and everything was cleaned up and looked to be a pretty straight forward case of road rage. But it was in the aftermath that Sean Payton obviously missing his friend and speaking with a heart rooted in tragedy said that he hated guns, and that New Orleans was like the wild, wild, west. Payton used the death of his friend to advance a progressive anti-gun stance without addressing the behavior that actually caused the violence in the first place, and that was disgraceful. It made Payton an even worse person than I already thought he was and he appeared to think as Smith did that his level of celebrity could free him of the burden of judgment. For instance, if Smith was as smart as news reports obviously wanted to portray him in this tragedy, why did he participate in a hit and run? Was he counting on making a call to his friends on the police force to resolve the issue and to ensure that he was above justice because of his celebrity? It certainly looked that way. Payton seems to think that he can make reckless progressive statements because the people of Louisiana want another Super Bowl win so he calculated that they would just put up with his banter without question.
Most of the people I know in my neighborhood have guns and they often carry them. Yet we never shoot each other—even when we get into traffic accidents. It was only a few months ago that a lady hit me on my motorcycle nearly injuring me badly. I was literally a half-inch away from losing my right leg. We were both armed with guys, yet even in such a crises it never occurred to either one of us to shoot each other. I simply yelled at her, and then once I saw how sorry she was, we quickly went to the business of settling the accident. It was a very civil way to settle a tragedy. It certainly didn’t devolve into the kind of violence that killed Will Smith. That is because the problem isn’t guns, its behavioral science. The football culture that Will Smith and Cardell Hayes lived within is built on primal valor and coaches like Sean Payton exploit that pent-up energy to win football games. For young people like Smith and Hayes—who often grow up fatherless, but find social redemption in popular gladiator sports the ethics on a football field often depend on an eye for an eye mentality. There is a lot that goes on during a football game psychologically that never shows up on a television screen for which Smith and Hayes have made their livings and it’s not easy to turn all that off for civilian life. Many football players have a hard time with that adjustment. Will Smith was apparently attempting to do that and he was mostly successful. But when you play a game where the alpha male rules the field and that an entire team depends on your ability to assert that dominance over other alpha males—the nature of the game doesn’t just leave the mind on the football field. It sometimes carries over into the streets of whatever communities they live in.
Will Smith abused his rights as a private citizen when he attempted to roll away from the accident. When he was challenged by another alpha male for attempting to flee likely they said things to each other that required in their minds an ultimate statement on who was the alpha male. Hayes not having any other intellectual resources to guide his actions went for his gun and the rest his history. But it wasn’t the gun that was the problem or that people carry them. It is that we have a society that doesn’t understand how important alpha males are and how hungry young people are to either become them, or yield to them. And for coaches like Payton who build alpha males for the benefit of football victories so that the people of New Orleans can feel good about themselves on a Sunday afternoon—he should have known better than to say the stupid things he did about guns. In a lot of ways Payton was just as guilty of what happened in that murder as the gun was. He breed and exploited the circumstances for which the violence was provoked in a road rage incident and like a coward—he deflected the blame to an inanimate object—instead of the behavior of the participants. For a coach that paid players on his defensive teams, which Smith was a part from 2009 to 2011—to physically harm other players to take them out of a game, the morality of gun violence doesn’t hold much water when Payton helped create a culture that inspired violence against others.
How guilty was Payton, well, for the NFL they came down on him hard—a $500,000 fine and a year suspension. Considering the problems the NFL has had and how much they’ve let go over the years—Payton must have been pretty guilty. If Payton had been a better coach and mentor, it is highly unlikely that Will Smith would have run away from a hit and run accident, or ran his mouth when cornered down the road by the victim. We are all products of our environment and in the world of professional football; the head coach is the judge, jury and executioner of environmental influence. Will Smith was a product of Sean Payton’s professional football teams and that product showed itself most when he crashed into Cardell Hayes then left the accident scene expecting to be relieved of the guilt. Why shouldn’t Smith have expected to not be punished when he watched so many of his friends and fans forgive his head coach and push behind justice just so they could witness one more win in New Orleans on any given Sunday? The answer is, Smith didn’t know better and that was the fault of a culture who made him that way—and the guilt for most of what shaped that culture for Will Smith led right into the office of Sean Payton.
I have a lot to thank Merle Haggard for and I’ve been thinking about them all since his death on April 6th 2016. He had a lot of great songs, but for me the most important and my personal favorite was ‘Misery and Gin.’ I was 12 years old when I saw the movie Bronco Billy by Clint Eastwood for the first time. It was and still is one of my favorite movies. It hit me at just the right time in my life. Like the Clint Eastwood character in that movie, I was socially awkward up to that point, so I could easily relate to his quirkiness. But the tenacity for which the Bronco Billy’s character stuck to his beliefs even in spite of a changing world held a lot of appeal to me—so I watched it often. One particular time was as a late teenager, I had just been in a serious car accident running around with friends. The driver crashed in a manner that should have killed everyone. I had blood running down every part of my body, and every bone hurt. It was probably the most fun I had ever had watching a movie was that particular time. I had taped Bronco Billy on a new VHS tape off television and enjoyed watching it when I needed a lift—and as I breathed a sigh of relief at still being alive, the Bronco Billy message resonated intensely with me at that particular time. And of all the good songs in that movie it was ‘Misery and Gin’ which had taught me the most about life. Clint Eastwood wisely allowed Merle Haggard to have an extended section of the movie to sing his new song and rolled it nicely into the events of the movie—and I never forgot it.
‘Misery and Gin’ was everything that I didn’t want to be in life. It was a parody of itself, a country song that espoused all the misery that drinking, picking up loose women, and bars filled with cigarette smoke entailed. It was an extremely honest song and was one that I decided very early on that I wanted nothing to do with relating to lifestyle choices. It reminded me of several uncles I had who lived that life, and I thought they were losers. It gave me more conviction to turn away from that kind of life well before I was deep into puberty—and I am thankful for it. Regarding the night of the car accident, I was with a friend in a hot rod car after a Christmas party for the place we worked. That friend and I had a rival relationship; we would continually outdo each other on daring deeds. We took outlandish risks to satisfy the inner daredevil in us—such as playing high-speed chicken with cop cars, fighting the biggest bullies in whatever number they presented themselves and performing any risk of physical manner that opportunity allowed like jumping across high-rise roof tops. We did some really crazy things that should have killed us several hundred times over—and neither of us ever backed down from anything. But you can only push things so far. We both had a knack for coming out on top no matter how deep in trouble we got ourselves. I think I was around 17 at the time.
One thing I had on this friend is that he had difficulty with talking to girls and women. I was never afraid to talk to any girl anywhere about anything. It was very easy for me, but for him it was extremely difficult. He could never find the right words for the right girl. So I’d hang that over his head whenever I could. He’d respond by showing off more to compensate for his inequity. I had arranged for three very attractive girls to race us back to his house after this Christmas party so he was showing off in his hot rod car to do his part in impressing them. He let them get on the highway in front of us by nearly a mile and his plan was to blow by them at over 150 MPH—to show them how fearless and how powerful his car was—because we all know that girls like that kind of thing—the naughty side of them anyway. That’s when his angle was wrong and there was too much traffic on the road and his Chevy, Nova had too short of a wheel base to maneuver quickly in any kind of evasive action so he fishtailed wildly into a retaining wall after blowing by the girls and the car spun endlessly through the heavy traffic before going airborne then flipping end over end down the highway. Of course we didn’t wear seat belts in those days.
Miraculously we landed with the car pinned up against a retaining wall, nose down and pieces of the car strewn all over the highway. We were both alive and hadn’t hit any other cars somehow. But we were all sliced up from broken glass and the violence of the impacts. The police came and arrested my friend for reckless operation, endangerment and a whole host of other violations. I was free to go to the hospital. Instead, the three girls took me home and helped me get all patched up. I put duck tape on the deep cuts to hold the skin together and applied maple syrup to clot up the blood that was still dripping everywhere. After all that was over, I watched Bronco Billy after popping some popcorn and having a nice cold Coke. That is when I realized that life didn’t get any better than that. A good movie, a nice drink, and the thrill of being alive—all I needed was a nice woman to share that kind of thing with. I met my wife about 9 months later—and obviously now I live a lot like Bronco Billy did in that movie—by choice largely because I decided to after that night. It was a little more complicated than that, but looking back, it’s pretty easy to see.
Of that movie it was actually Merle Haggard’s song ‘Misery and Gin’ which communicated strongest to me. I decided I wanted no part of living anything like that life. While most everyone I have known before and since find appeal to that lifestyle—it doesn’t have to be a country honky-tonk, it could be a BW3s or a nightclub—drinking and hanging out with women who have made bad decisions in their lives and living a life of perpetual misery just wasn’t something I was going to do—and I never have. Even that night in the car, it was my love of life which was the secret ingredient that the girls liked so much and why it was so easy to get them to come along and do whatever I wanted—including patching me up. Of course nobody understood that—but I knew it was the promise of getting away from the misery and gin lifestyle that the girls had been trained which was their ultimate fate by a society stuck to that fate by their own bad decisions. I offered a release from that, something of a lottery ticket. It was very appealing to both the opposite sex, and the guy friends I had who clearly wanted to be a part of it whenever possible.
I used Bronco Billy to bond with my wife. We watched it several times a month during our early marriage and she came to understand the words of Merle Haggard very well. Without Bronco Billy, it might have been too difficult to convey to her what kind of life I intended to live. She wouldn’t have understood. But the mood of the entire movie was captured so nicely in that old Merle Haggard song and I have to thank him for it. It put my life in a positive direction very early. Without it, I probably would have still found a way, but it might have taken me a decade or two more to figure it all out. Because of his song, I was able to accelerate the process and apply it much more quickly than if it hadn’t of ever been made. So I’ll miss Merle Haggard. He made my life better in a lot of ways. He was certainly one of the greats and I’ll always be thankful. Listen to the words and maybe it will help you too.
The answer to the elephant in the room is that it is dead—and has been so for some time. It is time to acknowledge it and move on to something else. The Republican Party, which was created to end slavery, for which Abraham Lincoln was its best spokesman—died a long time ago—and is no longer effective. If you put Karl Rove, John Kasich, Mitt Romney and me in a room together all three of them added up would not even come close to me as far as conservatism—so they do not represent me as a political party. They have lost their war with the left and become too much like the enemy—the political left in America. They are useless to me in a representative republic. I have voted for them over and over again for several decades, but they have always been ineffective and the reason was that we were voting for a taxidermy version of an elephant, instead of a real creature full of vigor.
That nagging prospect has been on my mind for quite a long time, but it was never clearer than on the night Ted Cruz won the Wisconsin primary. Cruz has no shot of winning the nomination, yet the party, the media, and all the #NEVERTRUMP fans worshiping the dead and deceased Republican Party behaved as though a New Year had dawned on them and life had been returned to their caricature. Only Donald Trump has a mathematical path of achieving the Republican nomination at the Convention in July. Nobody else does—yet the party is willing to use anybody and anything to delay Trump so that they could hold onto their grip of party control and what they believe are conservative values. Yet studying the voting patterns of Wisconsin, it was only in the heavily populated areas—particularly those most affected by the major talk radio stations which espoused the #NEVERTRUMP mantra loudest that Cruz won. All of the surrounding, rural counties went for Trump. It was almost a carbon copy of the type of voting pattern seen when Democrats compete against Republicans. Country people were having their voices drowned out by the more heavily populated urban areas—and they were not happy about it. The Republican Party wanting any good news that it could get was willing to accept any information that stopped Trump from becoming head of the party—even to the point of self-destruction. The short-sightedness was grossly obvious.
But the glee that emerged from their mouths was rather pathetic. It signified a political party at the Alamo not acting heroically in one last stand, but of a bunch of soldiers out of bullets knowing that the end was coming then seeing that the encroaching army was short on ammunition themselves and was awaiting supplies—they were able to live for five more minutes and were happy about it—even boastful. They were so happy that they denied Trump of roughly 40 little delegates that they missed the point of what the supporters of the GOP frontrunner were espousing. They were just happy that they had a better chance of getting the nomination process to a convention so that they could insert somebody they were more comfortable with—as if the public would put up with it. It was a pretty disgusting display.
My first thoughts and those which stayed with me after considerable contemplation were that the Republican Party just needed to be put to rest. A new party needed to be created, one that better represented conservatives and rural voters much more accurately. I think Trump should make a point and win his remaining primary victories, but that he should then just start his own party—likely a continuation of the Reform Party for which he, Pat Buchannan and Ross Perot were a part of in the past. Even Rob Portman was a part of the Reform Party when he ran for the congressional seat he took over in 1993—I know that because he was going to the same meetings I was—I knew him back then. It’s time for a fresh start and a completely new political philosophy not rooted in the failures of the past. A return to the Party of Reagan is not enough for me. I want something better than what Abraham Lincoln was the head of.
Regardless of how many delegates Trump has, the #NEVERTRUMP people have shown that they will not behave themselves and unite behind him—which they should do. So they need to be destroyed as a movement. We need to have a head to head election with Hillary, Paul Ryan, and Donald Trump. Trump as everyone knows by now has a solid 30% support base no matter what. In a three-way race, that almost gets him an assured victory. I don’t believe Hillary will be able to get 50% of a vote in any election—especially with the troubles she has, and there is no way Ryan beats Trump. I think it’s obvious that given a choice in a three-way race it’s not Republicans that will be split. Kasich as it stands now is similar to Hillary in politics, Cruz with Ryan, and then there is Trump who is about 7 to 8% ahead of everyone else routinely. That is the number nobody is talking about, and it would give Trump a victory in a three-way race without question. So why not? If we don’t have this showdown now—voters will continue to be tricked into voting for the stuffed caricature of an elephant—and that’s just not fair to them.
The only advantage for Trump to win the nomination from the Republican Party is to tap into the funds to run a national campaign. However, Bernie Sanders has shown what people are willing to do to fund a campaign, and Trump has more access to funds from his fans than any political candidate has in the history of politics. I wouldn’t fault Trump for taking $10 million dollar donations from his friends—like Carl Icahn and others to win a general election. I think he has a better chance of winning as a third-party candidate than as head of the Republican Party with all the inner back stabbing that will take place even if he wins the nomination outright. So he should just leave and let them flail on the vine rudderless. The Republican Party doesn’t deserve Trump and they certainly don’t deserve me and the many voters who are sick and tired of the establishment passivity toward Democrats.
To all the #NEVERTRUMPS, I don’t want to be in a political party with you people. I want nothing to do with your stupidity. I’m happy to have it out in a general election in a three-way race and see what happens after the smoke clears. What has to happen is a major philosophic shift in political philosophy—the standard mode of operation just won’t be acceptable. I have always supported the Reform Party, I did when Ross Perot ran in 1992 and in 1996, and I supported Trump and Buchannan when they toyed with the idea in 1999. The reason that the election between Bush and Gore was so close in 2000 was literally that people had to pick between one piece of shit and another. Which one was better—nobody knew and the country was split right down the middle. Bush was not a good president, and then the GOP thought to offer us John McCain, and Mitt Romney.
They are just stupid—rooting for the GOP is like cheering on the Cincinnati Bengals to win a Super Bowl. They just don’t have the ability to get to the big game—let alone win. So let’s just drop them once and for all. Even if Trump secures the nomination with a win in California—he should still go third-party so that the Republicans can be put in a museum with all the other stuffed animals. They are guaranteed losers who will continue down that path until they are taken out of the game. And the time to do that is now-before they do any more damage. Basically, either the GOP brings in fresh blood, or we dump the party, change the name, and have something else to represent conservative values. Not “progressive” conservative values like many of these #NEVERTRUMPs believe (Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, John McCain, ETC.) But something all together different and more representative of the rural inhabitants of this country—I’m at the point in 2016 of its either Trump for president or nothing for me. Hillary is not even a factor. She can’t even beat an old communist lover. She is not as formidable as the media wants you to believe.
These are my kind of girls. Who said Donald Trump didn’t do well with women? Ted Cruz does well with women, but not in the right way—sounds like he has serious problems—which Diamond and Silk do a wonderful service to break down for their viewers.
What was that Glenn Beck said about Ted Cruz—he’d drop him in a minute if any of these sex stories was true—but that he didn’t believe Ted had any “game” with women? Hmmmmm, sounds like Ted has more game than he let on. What are you gonna’ do now Beck?
They are lucky in a lot of ways that in America, we have the 1st Amendment. Because the outrage is protecting them from those of us who are fully awake. We are shooting words in an open marketplace instead of bullets. It is obvious that many on the political left and establishment right don’t like the rebellion that is currently occurring, because not enough people are complying to sustain their formulaic plans. But, too bad. I will never submit to their way of thinking. It’s just not going to happen. If given opportunities to compete in the marketplace of ideas, I’m happy to use that method to fight them with debate. But if that goes away, I’m happy to do it in other ways—and I can assure everyone, that compliance with the current conditions is not an option. To understand what I’m talking about, do yourself a favor, listen and watch this Alex Jones broadcast from Friday March, 25th. While you are working in the garage on this nice spring day, or around the house, listen to this very good report—its three hours long. I don’t agree with all of it, but it is quite good at detailing the fight we are all facing. Don’t be asleep, it’s time to get up and go to work. Join me on the battlefield.
And do a friend a favor and send this to them to help them wake up as well. If you want the evidence of what Jones is saying, I have written millions and millions of words providing the proof. Just look up any topic in the search bar on the left and you’ll find the evidence to substantiate what you are hearing. If you doubt any of this remember that last night, the same day as this Alex Jones broadcast, Bernie Sanders–a socialist–filled up a 15,000 seat baseball stadium in Seattle. The communists are rising, and the only defense there is against them–are us.
For me it was the best election I’ve enjoyed in quite some time. All my people didn’t win but the one I most supported did—and that was Ann Becker knocking out Patti Alderson off the Ohio State Central Committee. Patti is part of the party establishment that speaks about Republican values but behaves like a Democrat and she along with several like her gave us John Kasich. There were several Tea Party challengers to the establishment State Central Committee candidates who are all just as bad as Patti relative to political philosophy—and few of them broke through like Ann did—but now Becker can begin to do valuable work from the inside that will help guide the Republican Party back toward real conservatism instead of just RINO namesake—using the party to win elections then run like their more progressive rivals.
It never fails to shock me even knowing all that I do about how things work—to learn to what extent the Republican Party led by John Kasich in Ohio had a lock on voters through the machine of politics. I have been supporting Donald Trump for president and was happy with his wins on Tuesday, March 15th. I was hoping he’d get Ohio but based on the feedback I had from area Republicans attending a Trump event recently I was continually baffled to hear them talk about how they feared to let it be publicly known that they liked Trump. I mean these were grown adults and they were fearful of the wrath of some little hunchback progressive who could get his ass kicked by a falling leaf. There is nothing to fear about John Kasich. Yet politicians afraid of harming their rise to power within the party did not want party leaders to know that they were at this epic Trump event but only to get an autograph of the celebrity. The head of the Republican Party was supposed to be seated next to me, but he never showed up because obviously the party was in the bag for Kasich and he was expected to strong-arm his party members into supporting the current governor over Trump. That is precisely what is wrong with politics. Those politicians didn’t represent the people who elected them—they represented with real anxiety the desires of the party bosses and largely that temperament has been shaped over many years by people like Patti Alderson. So it was wonderful to see her go down in flames to someone I know will truly steer the State Central Committee into the direction of a constitutional republic.
As the nationwide results came in I was embarrassed for Ohio and the Republican Party that was so proud of their ability to turn out votes for John Kasich—in spite of him being an extreme loser who has no chance nationally of winning anything outside of a complete insurrection at the National Convention. Trump and Cruz are the clear favorites among voters leaving all the establishment types in the dust of recollection. Listening to Kasich talk you’d think he just won the Super Bowl. What was painful to me was what many of those area Republicans and their donors said to me just a few days prior at the Trump event. If given a choice, they’d vote a different way. I’d say to them that nobody knows how you vote when it’s just you in the booth. That’s when they’d say to me—“yes they do.” They didn’t want it to ever be discovered that they supported anybody but Kasich for President in 2016—even though the guy had no chance to do anything nationally. With all that strong-arming by party bosses Kasich won a measly 66 delegates. To date he has barely broke 100 which is deplorable. Only career politicians would think such a thing was something to celebrate.
Patti Alderson in spite of the people who will tell me and you dear reader that she’s a pinnacle of virtue is exactly the type of person who is bad for the Republican Party. She supported increases in taxes—has used charities as a means of extortion against children by blocking out people who actually tried to help then smeared the people who were really trying to point a light on what she was doing with the unionized educators embedded deeply in our community. I know firsthand what she’s like behind the smiles and the charity—and she went after my name rather viciously once all other means of stopping my anti-tax group ran out. In a lot of ways what she did locally was a lot like what the Republican Party is doing now to Donald Trump. They don’t know how to stop him so they are attacking him. And like him I have a similar social policy—I never forget, I do hold grudges and even if it takes 100 years, I look to get even against those who have done me wrong. There is nothing wrong with that type of animosity—it is the difference between winners and losers. All this turning the other cheek stuff in my view is a stupid position to take on anything—it certainly isn’t a path to any kind of victory. If they hit you, you always hit them harder and harder until they stop and give up.
It was four years to the day that I had to dig in like Trump and defend my record by an onslaught of media and public sentiment coordinated by Patti against me to essentially preserve all that she had built connecting the Republican Party to Lakota Schools and the tax increases that she wanted. I encouraged all my Republican friends to stand with me, that what Patti was doing with her tax increase support around the community using charity to help sell it would lose in the end in spite of the mudslinging—that all she was trying to do would backfire if everyone would just hold their ground. But they listened to her because she was a party insider instead of me and history told the rest of the story. I am proud to be the first that I know of in modern politics to do as Trump is now on a national stage. I tried to tell area Republicans to dig in and stand for something and some did. Most continued listening to Patti—like Judy Shelton who was strong-arming local Republican members to hold the line of the party even if the party was wrong philosophically. (CLICK TO REVIEW) Thankfully good people have been challenging the Republican establishment ever since and many have broken through. Ann is only the most spectacular and recent example. But many before her have been pounding away at those fences and now they are starting to break through.
Trump is a result of that offensive strategy, he would not have had the kind of success he is now prior to 2012. I said to an NPR reporter for WVXU at that Trump event standing in front of the Bernie Sanders supporters that politics was changing forever. Trump was paving the way for a new kind of politician—part entertainer, part private sector success story, and part WWF. It takes those entertainment attributes to break the party lines and establish yourself independently from any collectivist rule. I proved that 100 days after an onslaught that Patti Alderson led against me within the Republican Party to remove me from her plans by using a little authentic theatrics to gain supporters away from her way of thinking. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW. I was astonished by all the people who were happy that my methods had actually worked—they stopped me everywhere and thanked me for what I had done—which was simply to stand my ground when everyone else literally abandoned me at Patti’s direction. I wrote about my experiences extensively and now many thousands of people have read about that strategy. I said it in 2012—the way to win as a Republican was to hit back at Democrats harder than they hit you. Many being good Christians couldn’t get their mind around it. But the Saul Alinsky playbook exposes that tendency among Republicans to turn the other cheek and that’s how liberals have continued to beat conservatives time and time again, and there has been no end in sight, until that moment in 2012. So it gives me great satisfaction to see Ann Becker beat out Patti Alderson and to see Donald Trump using that same strategy on a national level. Not that Trump adopted any of my ideas; he’s certainly his own man. But enough people have been thinking about these things and a chain reaction within politics has taken on a life of its own.
It was quite enjoyable for me to watch Trump’s speech after he won essentially all the states on the March 15th election except for Ohio—knocking out Marco Rubio from the presidential race. Trump attacked the media, the GOP establishment and showed that he was standing by his campaign manager when there were calls for his head—and he did it with a smile on his face to the outrage of the media. I remember how it felt for me March 12th through March 15th of 2012 when Patti Alderson led her group of people to attack me in every way that she could without actually getting her hands dirty. I remember my hatred of Michael Clark from The Cincinnati Enquirer, the betrayal of Scott Sloan at WLW,and my supposed friends within No Lakota Levy who abandoned me while speaking to hundreds of thousands of people on the air in the moment when I needed them most. They did what they did because Patti had led them to their actions—I have the emails to prove it–still. But I stood my ground as hard as it was. Professionally, if I had been anyone else I would have been finished as a person in Butler County—but people like Patti didn’t care in the least. For her the needs of the many out-weighed the needs of the few and if I was getting in the way—even if I was technically correct—then disposal was the option. It was a hard period of time for me. But I dug in and stood my ground and people thanked me for it. And now, just four years later my friend Ann Becker has replaced Patti Alderson from her Central Committee seat and Donald Trump is running for president and is essentially using the same methods I did to advance his tactical position. And this time the Republican establishment can’t stop him. Because those of us on the cutting edge have seen the weak spots in the party system and now it is coming apart. And that gives me great satisfaction for really the first time in over thirty years of political observation. March 15th was a good day for our Constitutional Republic. And things are just getting started. It’s not that anger and flamboyancy are the proper means to defending a republic, but when fear is used to keep party members in line and to force people to do things that they otherwise wouldn’t on their own—the best way to deal with it is to throw it back in the perpetrator’s face and stand up to the bully—whoever it is. There is one thing in this world that I have no tolerance for and that is a bully. Trump isn’t the bully—it’s the people who use party members to hold people to a worthless vote that goes against the voters. And of that class—Patti Alderson was one of the most frequent violators. She didn’t bully people with force—she does it with a smile on her face and a large check book. But the methods are conducted under coercion nonetheless—and that has to end at every level of government, from local to international.
So how did Ann win that important election—well, I’ll tell you. She was at the Trump rally in West Chester even though she’s a Cruz supporter—she went where the people were and she talked to those many thousands who were standing in the rain trying to get into the packed venue. Those were people who were definitely going to vote in West Chester for Trump and she gave them her name on the ballot. Most people reading through such ballots have no idea who Patti Alderson was, but they knew Ann because she handed them literature with her name on it working the crowd. She went door to door. She was on the nightly local television news. She had write ups in the newspaper. She was on the radio. And she had commercials on 55 KRC. In short, she took nothing for granted and she actively worked every angle possible to the largest extent possible. She simply out-worked the incumbent Patti Alderson who sat back and expected her reputation to carry her through the election. That is how you beat these incumbents dear reader. You simply outwork them. That is how Trump is doing it, and that is how Ann won. If everyone who is a freedom lover did the same—the establishment would cease to be. You don’t have to play party politics and fall in line with the leadership. You simply outwork everyone else and stick by your guns no matter what. That is the best path to success in any endeavor—and it needs to become the standard mode of operation in politics.
The Overmanwarrior 