A lot of right thinking people believe there is something wrong with Barack Obama’s roots to Islam. When he was first elected president discussion about his religious past was forbidden by the press because they wanted a black president at any cost. They put reason aside and all the facts that were emerging to get him elected. Well, now in hindsight the cost of that debacle is evident. I wouldn’t say that Barack Obama is a Muslim, but it is clear that he is sympathetic toward the religion because of his deep family ties to it. Bill O’Reilly did a good segment on the facts of the matter seen here:
Obama is actually a hybrid of all kinds of screwed up ideas provided to him by his globetrotting, man-jumping mother. Obama’s childhood was filled with Muslims and as O’Reilly stated, it is obvious that the president is too sympathetic toward the Islamic faith to take decisive actions against ISIS—which is a dereliction of duty. As an adult, Obama attended the church of Jeremiah Wright’s religion of “god-damn-America” which is a Chicago hybrid of Christianity, Islam and ghetto politics. It is because of Wright that Obama thinks he can get by with calling himself a Christian.
But his version of it and the rest of America are quite different. However, Obama wouldn’t know that because he is after all not from here. He may have been born in Hawaii even though there is still controversy about even that. Obama was raised in Indonesia by a step-dad who like his actual father was a Muslim. That is if you believe that his real dad was the man who was married to two women at the same time and not the communist Frank Marshall Davis. Obama was a screwed up little boy who grew up into a screwed up man whose sympathies toward Islam has helped fuel the rise of ISIS.
And those are the facts. Pass them along to a friend because Obama has injected himself into the 2016 race, and that makes him fair game once again.
One of the things you should be thinking about during the Fourth of July 2016 and thereafter is what freedom costs, and what it produces. One of the best ways to understand the character of Americans produced under the banner of freedom is to watch war movies that are rooted in truth, like We Were Soldiers by Mel Gibson, American Sniper, and of course the very relevant 13 Hours—which has Hillary Clinton’s name all over it as far as a resume. As we blast of our fireworks and celebrate our independence obviously rooted in sheer defiance I wish that American ideas of freedom were in every home around the world so that other people could produce the type of men that were displayed in Michael Bay’s 13 Hours.
Do yourself a favor, watch 13 Hours and recommend it to someone you care about, no matter where they live in the world. Without America’s influence in faraway lands like Libya, the world is an armpit. I’ve traveled around the world and witnessed many cultures, and studied many that are no longer around and without dispute America is the best and the people of the world deserve much better than they have now.
But the most important thing to take away from 13 Hours is the sheer incompetence of the Barack Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints all over it, from positioning Ambassador Chris Stevens in harm’s way to lying about the motivation of the terrorists to the public in the days after. If Clinton were a normal human being she would retire in shame after the whole Benghazi incident happened on her watch under her guidance. I don’t think she deliberately stoked the fires of terrorism to kill Ambassador Stevens or anything like that, but she clearly mismanaged the situation. Even though the film never names her directly, the people at the heart of the storm in 13 Hours were clearly victims of sheer incompetence. Hillary should have resigned over the incident and Obama should not have been re-elected. However, to protect their political careers, both Clinton and Obama lied about the motivations and the danger—then attacked anybody who wanted to look into what went wrong as a conspiracy theorist. They fought against the congressional investigation which just wrapped up this past week, intensely. Read it for yourself by CLICKING HERE. Our Fourth of July is a reminder of what makes Americans special to begin with. When our government goes bad we have mechanisms in place to remove those failures and our fireworks customs are reminders of that back-pocket trait. The primary reason we all must protect the freedom to arms in America is because we could easily find ourselves in our own version of 13 Hours from our homes under incompetent government led by people like Hillary Clinton.
One thing that really surprised me about 13 Hours was how many people were actually involved, and how many casualties there were. The firefight between the CIA and the contractors who starred in the film was intense all through the film. That wasn’t reported on the news. Much of what happened in Benghazi wasn’t reported by even conservative outlets. Even Fox News let Hillary Clinton off too easy for her role in the whole event. It is unbelievable that only three years later that idiot was running for President of the United States. If she were human, she wouldn’t show her face in public and would stay into hiding for the rest of her life licking her wounds. After watching 13 Hours, Hillary isn’t qualified for POTUS just because of Benghazi, not to mention the long list of other problems she has. Over this past weekend the FBI had to have a meeting with her regarding her email server, which was illegally set up and exposed sensitive material to villains while she was running the Benghazi debacle as Secretary of State. The list is long with Clinton. She is a reminder of why we cannot trust government blindly and why we must keep our guns close. We give idiots like Hillary Clinton some power and if she turns that power against us to protect her career—then we have to take that power away from her at some point. The fact that she’s running for POTUS after her embarrassing stint as a Secretary of State for Barack Obama says everything.
I watched 13 Hours with my family the night before the Fourth of July. I thought it would be good, but I didn’t expect it to be as good as it was. Every single American should watch it. It’s really easy; I rented it off the Playstation Store. It was only ten years ago when my family would make a similar trip to Blockbuster Video to rent movies we didn’t catch at the theater. Now we just rent them at home and directly download them to watch without even getting out of our chairs. 13 Hours is also available as a MOD on cable and the DVD/Blue Ray is out anywhere that those types of things are offered, which is just about everywhere. After watching the movie, I’d recommend buying it for a home collection. It was good enough. I will definitely want to watch it again. Regardless, there is no excuse for not seeing the movie. It’s easy to get and it’s good enough to block a few hours out of your day to see. It is the perfect thing to watch as a family before shooting off Fourth of July fireworks. Freedom wasn’t fought for once over 200 years ago and that’s all we celebrate. It is fought for every day by you, me, and those fine people in 13 Hours. Being an American is a special thing and the world does need our influence. Without that influence, the tribes of losers around the world that wants to yank their people back to the Stone Age is prevalent. So it’s not just us we protect—we are the beacon of light that the world must yearn for. Without guns and the bravery of the type of people born and raised under the opportunities that freedom creates—idiots like Hillary Clinton run the world and when they mess up, lots of people suffer as they did from all sides in Benghazi.
I highly recommend 13 Hours. You should watch it without haste and come to terms with what it says about our modern government—which ended up embarrassing me more than I already was. The film wasn’t just a story about the six guys featured in the firefight at the Annex, it had a lot of others connected who could have provided contrary information if the film wasn’t true. But they didn’t—because they couldn’t. If you really want to know how bad it is out there, then 13 Hours is the place to start. It really was the start of ISIS because once America withdrew from that region after Benghazi the rebels who had been getting weapons from the United States through the black market provided by our government to overthrow all the dictators around the Middle East organized to create ISIS—to perpetuate a global caliphate. Just two days before the Fourth of July celebrations in America during 2016 ISIS attacked innocent people in Bangladesh. Hillary’s mismanagement at Benghazi not only unleashed ISIS that evening, but it opened the lid of terrorism that America had carefully been trying to contain for three decades with a naive notion motivated by John Lennon song’s about a global world united by love and pot smoke. What she and Obama got was a world being pulled back into the Middle Ages once American freedom was pushed out of the region—and many more people suffered. And it’s time that people understand the situation for what it is.
Watch the videos of this article carefully and consider what is at stake during this upcoming election. And make sure to share this with someone you care about.
I didn’t comment right away on the Benghazi Committee report released on June 28th 2016, because I wanted to read the report first. So I took a good part of the day to read it, all 800 pages. I read a lot, it took me many hours, but it was worth it. Sadly, most of the news agencies out there, including the AP wire published their responses within minutes of Trey Gowdy’s release of all their hard work. The press’s main concern was in insuring that Hillary Clinton was off the hook so that the report wouldn’t harm her run for the American presidency. I would urge you dear reader to go through that report for yourself. The link is below. I would also urge you to listen to the Rush Limbaugh podcast which occurred during the release. It was a good show that describes very acutely the current dramatic split between the American political right, and the global oriented political left. The two are not compatible and the evidence is rather grotesque. Do yourself a favor, read the report, listen to the entire Rush Limbaugh episode, and consider where you stand in it all.
My take on the report is that it shows just how terrible political correctness has become in American politics. Our military was ineffective and entirely too concerned about what Libya might think of their presence. Clinton’s foreign policy as Secretary of State for the Obama administration was terrible. Obama himself with Leon Panetta totally mismanaged the entire situation and people died. Libya was their creation, the anxiety was the result of their doing, everything about the entire situation was a result of failed leftist policy led by the Obama administration. I can’t say that what they did was malicious. After reading the Benghazi report it is obvious that a lot of people had good intentions, including Obama’s people, but that they were just too stupid to conduct the situation correctly and what we have learned is that those types of people should be removed from all government positions. I don’t think they can even live correctly in America because they don’t value it, and therefore cannot do what is necessary every day to keep it a great place to live. In other words if the god damn hippies of yesteryear want to smoke pot and life in a welfare state, they should move to Amsterdam. They should not expect to transform America into some European hell hole. If they want to change America into something else, they should leave. We’d all be happier living apart from each other.
We are at an impasse in America that is quite different from any other period in history. Even during the Revolutionary War, the Patriots had things in common with the Tories—they at least shared a love for the homeland. They both wanted to live a good life. Most of them shared a common religion and could at least be civil to one another while at the local tavern. During the Civil War, the North and the South were both descendents of the brave people who settled America from Europe. They wanted a good life, but disagreed over the issue of slavery—which evolved under the American Constitution. After the war, the two sides were able to reconcile to some extent and continue building the greatest nation on earth. But now, the difference between the traditional conservatives and the globalist liberals are too great. The two sides do not share much of anything. One side wants to preserve the greatness of America, the other side wants to steal it away and give it away to the rest of the world only to be consumed like a log on a raging fire—lost forever after the violence of initial heat has died.
It is obvious that we are at war and only one side can stay in the United States. The two political philosophies cannot share the government oversight of a strong nation–because they are too divided on basic values. The people who quickly rushed to judgment about this Benghazi report seeking to protect Hillary Clinton for purely ideological reasons are the enemy. They are the domestic enemies that we all swear to protect America from and they are here, in our schools teaching our kids, they are running our institutions, they run our government, and they are running our media from entertainment, music, and the press. They are here to destroy our nation and their handiwork is all over the Benghazi report. What happened in Libya is what we are all headed for. They don’t belong in America. They’d be happier in Europe so it’s probably time we force them to leave our shores for our own preservation so they can live among others of their own kind. There is no middle ground on this issue. The political right and the left cannot live together. That is what I learned by reading the Benghazi Committee report.
I dare you dear reader to watch the fabulous film Cartel Land by Matthew Heineman for the sheer guts it took to film it. This was a movie I had on my radar for a while and due to the long Memorial Day weekend and the easy access of it on Netflix, I was able to finally watch it. If you really want to see the tip of the iceberg of what’s going on in Mexico—just the tip—then watch this movie today. It shows a lot of good people wrapped up in a completely destroyed system where government institutions have been entirely wiped away and yield to organized crime. Here is a clip of the filmmaker and some sample scenes.
Drugs are death—there is nothing good that comes from them in any way. If you take drugs, you are feeding these organized crime elements, and you are part of the vast evil they are spreading. I can’t say there was a single good guy in Cartel Land, but there were a lot of people who dared to think of themselves that way. For some standing up to the cartels was their very last act at some sort of redemption and to them I say, wonderful. Better late than never. But people in America better get it through their thick skulls quickly just how bad the situation truly is. Mexico is a destroyed country and the illegal immigration is technically an invasion against ours for the open destruction of American sovereignty. And to be honest, who could blame the Mexican people for wanting to leave such an armpit of a country. If there is one thing that Matthew captured so well was the many good people stuck in a situation where death, poverty, and oppression were the only things they have to look forward to. If any country should do any invading its America into Mexico. After watching Cartel Land I think we should invade Mexico, free all their people—clean up the cartels completely, and turn the whole county into an American state—like Texas. Those poor people would be a lot better off.
It was an amazing film. I already felt quite passionately about the drug cartels and the people who suffer most by them. But this movie really captured the desperation. You should watch it today. With Netflix, it doesn’t get any easier—so there’s no excuse not to see it.
Yes, during this broadcast on WAAM in Ann Arbor, Michigan with Matt Clark, I predicted the end of the Democratic Party. What, Why, How, When and Where I described in some detail during the radio broadcast. Click the link below to hear it for yourself and be sure to pass it along to a friend in need of some energy in these trying times. Don’t worry, help is coming!
Matt Clark needed to head out-of-town so he asked me to host his WAAM radio show at 1 PM on Saturday, which I accepted. For just such occasions I now have a home studio to broadcast from since with my busy schedule, it is nearly impossible for me to actually do so from a fixed location. It had been a very busy Saturday morning—so busy that there wasn’t even time to eat breakfast, so as I was doing show prep about a half hour before going on the air my wife brought me some Chick-fil-A to eat. While I ate I was watching the news on a studio monitor. This is what I saw:
WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Once I got on the air I unloaded all the connecting events that had happened just during that particular news week and finished off with the conclusion that America was at the end of its rope. We needed to take action right now to correct our treacherous conditions otherwise we wouldn’t get a second chance. This is what it sounded like. Click the link, sit back and listen—then share it with a friend.https://soundcloud.com/clarkcast/april-16-2016-guest-hosted-by-rich-hoffman-4-16-16-podcast
First I spoke about the Russian jets buzzing American ships in the Baltic. Putin has been openly challenging American interests around the globe. He calculated that under the Obama presidency that the military would not fire on his pilots and that he could flex his muscle in the Baltic region. He was right much to all of our embarrassments. America should have shot down those Russian jets. It is hard to take the life of other people, but the Russians shouldn’t have provoked our military.
Donald Trump is about to win New York big, which shouldn’t be a surprise. Running a populist campaign Trump is at a severe disadvantage to other political candidates who know the system better than him, because they helped create the rules. Trump needs a very dominating victory in New York otherwise this whole election process will linger on needlessly. Kasich is going nowhere, and neither is Cruz. For the sake of the Republican Party, it needs to get behind Trump. Otherwise Trump will need to start his own party so that the focus can shift to a general election victory instead of all the party oriented politics.
Hillary Clinton is running for president even though she’s under investigation by the FBI. Think about how amazing that is—we actually have the first woman running for president with a barrage of scandals on her coat tails—and she’s the expected front-runner. This would have been the story of the decade in the 80s or 90s, but with all the topics of our day, it’s just one element that is almost background noise.
We have over 19 trillion dollars in national debt which to me is the biggest story of all. We are actually talking about 21 trillion dollars within a few years of now, and that is unfathomable. On the radio show I proceeded to talk about all the regions of the country planning to file for bankruptcy to get out from under all this massive debt—but there is nowhere to run. At the current 19 trillion-dollar deficit it exceeds our national GDP and is big trouble for having any hope at actually paying it off in our lifetimes. This is the clear exhibition of incompetent management of our government and it demands immediate action to avoid default. The only way out is massive economic expansion of 7% to 10%–to have a chance at surviving with our national sovereignty.
Socialists around the country are demanding $15 dollars an hour for minimum wage which is insane. Money is a measurement of value—if money is just handed out indiscriminately, it loses its value and inflation is invoked. It is truly pathetic that more people do not understand basic economic concepts. Fast-food workers are not worth $15 dollars an hour by market measurement. The government backed increase will only cost jobs because it will force companies to automate their processes to cover their margins. To the socialists that are causing all these problems globally, they just don’t understand that money is a measurement of values which they don’t see or understand because their emphasis is on equality—which essentially is a unit of measure that throws out all judgment. You can’t have any kind of functional society without human judgment. One thing I do on this site is write abundant articles on archaeology, as I am pretty obsessed with the causes of demise regarding ancient cultures. I would attribute this tendency of demise to the Vico cycle which is a recurring theme given to human inclination hard-wired into our brains. It is up to us to rewire ourselves to think differently and to make a conscious decision to step away from that destructive cycle. The $15 dollar an hour minimum wage proposal is a promise to destroy our economy—which has always been the goal of socialists.
John Kasich is an unmitigated, delusional idiot totally out of touch from reality. Watching him run for president makes you wonder if that guy has actually retained his sanity. I think he has lost it somewhere over the last few years—he is certainly not the same person I knew back in 2010. He sounds like a babbling fool and he’s just embarrassing. He has no moral platform to even consider being nominated for president and he’s functioning under the assessment that he does. I get messages from his campaign every day talking about how he’s the only guy who can beat Hillary in a head to head election. Give me a break. I don’t think he could win at anything against anybody. He’s a buffoon obviously surrounded by complete idiots. His type of politician is exactly what has screwed up our government in the first place. It’s hard to believe that people like him are out there until you hear him talk and realize that he has so much support from the establishment. No wonder we are in so much trouble.
Bernie Sanders is actually beating Hillary head to head as a socialist—and that points to a radical shift in our country. Young people like Sanders, they are ready to embrace socialism because we’ve allowed the concept to be taught in our public schools and colleges, and now they are voters. As of now there is a strong chance that he could be the Democratic nominee and he has half the country at his back. Remember when Mitt Romney received all types of flack, which probably alone destroyed his 2012 campaign for president when he made the 47% comment? What he said was true and now just four years later those 47% are looking at an open socialist like Bernie Sanders and thinking hard about voting for him just so they can get free stuff. That is a serious problem—economically, and ethically.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg asked his employees this week if they should publicly denounce Donald Trump. I see Zuckerberg as just a stupid kid—a little midget boy who is about the same age as my kids who got lucky with some code that he wrote. His politics are consistent with other Millennials taught progressive ideology in public schools and George Soros activism from publications like MoveOn.org and Think Progress. Those publications then inspire more mainstream outlets like Rolling Stone and The Huffington Post. Zuckerberg even though he’s a billionaire is an open border socialist and he is the next great threat to our American Republican after George Soros finally dies off. The problem with Zuckerberg is that he has name recognition and a product that most everyone in America is using and loves. He is the Lex Luther of our real world—and he has to be stopped. For that reason, I am not on Facebook. As I explained on the radio, the people helping me with my book projects created Facebook accounts for those novels, but I personally don’t have anything to do with them because I reject Mark Zuckerberg in every way shape and form. He is an American villain.
The Ohio legislature is ready to throw in the towel to pro marijuana activists early in the fight to legalize medical pot before there is a vote in November. Again, as I explained on the radio, I am against pot in every way shape and form. I don’t take drugs, not even aspirin, so I’m dead-set against more drug legalization—especially medical marijuana. In Ohio, the legislators want to get their hands on the tax money that pot could bring to the state, because they are so miserably hungry for another revenue stream which will allow them to redistribute more tax payer money to people who don’t deserve it—that they’ll do and say anything—even create a marijuana bill avoiding tax payers at the ballot box in November. They are all villains as well, and they are selling out their state because they are lazy fools guilty of mismanaging our government.
And finally Puerto Rico wants to file for bankruptcy, it is $70 billion in debt and there is no hope of coming out of it. Democrats are against the proposed bill which is in front of Paul Ryan because it prevents a raise of the minimum wage in that territory as they push for socialist increases across America. If Puerto Rico is granted bankruptcy protection then following will be states like California and cities like Chicago who are all on unsustainable economic paths. So house Republicans have a major problem on their hands far worse than whether or not Donald Trump is their nominee. We have major, major, major problems and nobody is talking about it—because the consideration is so unpleasant.
So it was a busy one hour broadcast that rivals anything that you can hear on talk radio. Since Matt gave me an open opportunity on WAAM’s airwaves and I already had the hour blocked off, I took the time to make the case in a way that connects the dots for everyone listening not only to the live broadcast, but the podcast later. It’s valuable information that nobody in the mainstream news is able to provide to their supporters, because the complex nature prevents a correct understanding. But I have a unique background and an ability to tie it all together so I did. Hopefully you will enjoy the broadcast and will take the time to share it with someone you care about. Because we all have some hard decisions to make and we need good information to help us make them.
Trump was wrong when he declared that the process which robbed him of all the Colorado’s delegates without a single vote cast was not very democratic. He’s right about the democratic process, but America has never been a democracy—which is just a stepping stone toward open socialism. America is a constitutional republic which should be better but in this case isn’t. The voting process which was intended to select those representatives were sold to the public as being acquired through a democratic process—but in this case it was cut short and was sabotaged by the Republican Party. That revelation has only served to substantiate the intense level of anger that has intensified during the primary campaign season. Yes, the system is rigged, it always has been, and we all knew it. But we didn’t know what the cost was to us because we had never seen another viable alternative that had gotten so far in the process other than Ross Perot many years ago. Trump by his popular successes has forced the party leaders to outwardly show their protections for the first time to people who are learning about this whole process as it develops in front of them. We should have learned all this in our public schools, but instead kids learned to riot and vote for socialism—so people are shocked by what they are seeing.
Among the #NEVERTRUMP clan, there is a feel of superiority over Trump and his supporters because those constitutional geeks work really hard to understand the Constitution and are legitimate nerds in a lot of ways. They are like Star Wars fans who argue over little specifics of the movies because they know everything while the common viewer only see a fraction of what they do in casual viewings. The #NEVERTRUMPs like the rules of the system because they worked really hard to learn that system—it gives them a feeling of superiority over everyone else—they are specialists on that topic and they secretly want to protect that specialty. I know several of them personally. So it gives them quite a charge to see that Trump is furious at losing delegates to Cruz. They would argue that if Trump wanted to play the game, then he should have learned the rules. But, what those #NEVERTRUMP geeks have forgotten is that Trump’s candidacy represents a large faction of the American population that have no desire to learn the rules of the game—because they hate the game—and the Republican Party has just solidified that sentiment epically. They want a change in the rules, they want to play a different game, and they sure don’t have any desire to learn the old rules.
This notion that the Republican Party can do whatever it wants—that they can nominate anybody they care to is preposterous. Sure they have their little club and they seem obsessed with controlling who is in it with them and where they stand in the peaking order in relation to others. No question many of the party leaders want to be king makers deciding who county commissioners are, governors, and presidents—but that’s not the way it was supposed to be. What they want to control is ultimately representatives of “the people” who elect them into a representative republic. The Republican Party for instance isn’t bigger to me than myself, or my family, or my community. It’s just a group of people who I either agree with or don’t. I am not beholden to a sacrificial relationship with them in any way. So if they show themselves as philosophically deficient—as they are clearly in the run for presidency in 2016—I have a right, and obligation to reject them. The “Party” does not have authority over “me” and is not empowered to provide “me” with a representative vetted by them for their own purposes. Clearly the Republican Party interprets their role as such—but I along with many others completely reject that premise. I will not vote for Paul Ryan for anything. He screwed up in 2012 and he won’t get another chance by me. I will not vote for John Kasich. He is the governor of my state, and he has let me down—he’s turned out to be an idiot. I will not vote for Mitt Romney—he has been a failure. I will not vote for Ted Cruz—he’s just another attorney running for office. I don’t want any more legal geeks messing with laws any more. I’m tired of the same old mess offered by the Republican Party and they either want to represent my philosophic conservatism, or they don’t. If they don’t, I am not beholden to them to take whatever piece of crap they offer.
The Republican Party arrogantly believes that it is the end all of American politics—as if the matter has been settled long ago after the Civil War turned out in their favor. They’d be incorrect, each age has its own challenges and the party leaders are either aligned with those challenges, or they will fail to lead their party to a position where it can be beneficial to the constitutional republic for which we are all a part. That republic was always founded on the merits of individualism, not collective assimilation—and that is precisely where the Republican Party is going wrong—in assuming that the “party” is too big for any one individual.
Trump represents a public need to establish a return to individual association. He is the ultimate pronoun “I” and that is what the people who vote for him want to see emerge in this year’s election cycle and obviously the Republican Party has a problem with that declaration. That leaves Trump and his supporters without a party—which of course will give rise to a competing party to rival the Republicans and Democrats. If 30% of the voting public doesn’t have a political party which represents them—or seeks to—then what are they to do? Surrendering their beliefs to one of the two other options isn’t viable as individuals. Yet the Republican Party seems inclined to insist on such a thing. As Ted Cruz gloated about his legalese victories around the west, particularly Colorado—and the use of the party machine in Wisconsin to goad Donald Trump into throwing a fit because people weren’t voting for him—he is assuming that the masses are on his side. Show me one time that Ted Cruz can fill a stadium with supporters like Trump does. All Cruz has on his side are the political geeks, not the average people who make up our Republic. They aren’t–wait until Cruz gets to New York, and Pennsylvania. The masses are speaking, and they haven’t been picking Ted Cruz. Cruz has been playing the legal game, but not winning the hearts of the masses. When Kasich says that it’s the delegates that matter, he’s right from his perspective within the game of politics—but the party for which he belongs is supposed to serve the conservative interests of the republic and instead they serve a collective notion of consensus building which I would argue is un-American. Want to see a national consensus established by the will of the people where they generally agree—go to a Trump rally. Trump voters, me included, reject that collectivist philosophic position and the party should be listening, instead of working to hold society to a set of rules designed to protect a system they have learned to profit off of as public servants.
When the smoke clears, Trump will have won many more votes in the primary effort—yet the political party seeking to maintain their control of that system will attempt to ignore that fact and offer up the same old garbage as they have before. And now that many of us have had a taste of what could be, we aren’t going to swallow that pill again—because it leads nowhere and we’ve learned. It is not the voting public that has to learn a lesson here—it’s the Republicans. They either get with the program, or they will be replaced. It is they who are in the weakened position—the public holds all the cards because ultimately the “party” either serves the interests of the public—the conservative public—or they don’t. And given their behavior against the popular front-runner Trump—it is obvious where all this is going. When it gets there I’ll be joining that old man from Colorado. I’m not going to hold my nose and vote for another Republican loser. They either start winning—or I’m done too with them. And victories are measured by the popular vote in this primary race, not the legal gymnastics of lawyers and political geeks.
I’m at a point where I don’t think I could support Republicans even if they did get behind Trump all of a sudden. I think the process is so broken and the philosophies so displaced that there is no mending it. As the link above describes the Colorado situation from the point of the of the GOP, the issue remains that the party leaders have made a system that ultimately they control, because it is rule heavy and requires a full-time staff to learn all those rules. It puts the power of candidacy in pin-heads and political addicts instead of the best and most viable candidates and is the root cause for why the Republican Party has been so grossly ineffective for such a long time.
I’m not a big fan because often degenerates, welfare recipients, and the type of people who are most at home on the Jerry Springer Show populate the premises—but Wal-Mart in Fairfield, Ohio off Princeton Rd by Bridgewater Falls is finding itself the victim of progressive attack. In spite of my feelings about the place and the people it attracts, I think what Wal-Mart does is wonderful as a retail outlet. There are many more good things than bad; I’m just not a fan of the place because of the people who are often there. Take them all away, and I enjoy going there. Put me at Wal-Mart on a crowded Saturday to pick up mulch, and I’m not a happy person. But my wife is, she has shopped there for the entire time it has been in that location and it helped raise our family with food options that made it much easier for her to be a stay-at-home mom. One thing about my wife, she is intensely loyal, so she loves that particular Wal-Mart because it has been good for helping her raise her family with low-cost options over the many years. She likes the people who work there and finds their company refreshing—mostly because many of them are older people—whom she typically gets along well with. Since she is a housewife, she is able to go to Wal-Mart during the day when most people are working—and typically has a good experience.
But on March 29th, 2016 the foundations of her reality were shaken to her very core. She had been there to spend quite a lot of money, she bought most of our food for the week, some other items and had picked up a $300 pair of glasses from the optometrist. It was a hefty bill to pay and she was enjoying spending the money at a store she believed in—to her Wal-Mart represents raw American value—red, white, and blue patriotism—getting the most products for the lowest cost—lack of unionized labor and goods and services all under one roof. You can get your eyes checked, a pharmaceutical order fulfilled and have your tires changed all while you shop for groceries, lawn supplies, and pick-up wonderful toys for the grandchildren. But to her shock for the first time in nearly 15 years, she stepped up to the check-out and only one lane was open—because it was the middle of a weekday and there wasn’t a need for multiple lanes to be open—and what she found was a transsexual kid dressed in blue lipstick, short black hair, a push-up bra, and a black skirt working the cash register. She had no choice but to go through his lane and she was very pissed off about it.
For context, we choose to live in an area of the country where we don’t have to deal with derelicts like this. As a couple, we don’t go to areas of the city where gay bars are prominent; we don’t hang out on college campuses, and we don’t go to music concerts where these kinds of people are increasingly commonplace. Even though I like Key West, we don’t hang out on Duval Street late at night where transsexuals, homosexuals, and transvestites are populating every street corner on the south end. We don’t go to Fantasy Fest there—where middle-aged repressed sociopaths with above average incomes can frolic in the decadence of a Romanian orgy. We don’t watch television shows that embrace those types of progressive attributes outside of male and female monogamous relationships. We don’t want that kind of crap in our life, and we make choices to avoid it. So it was quite a shock to my wife to have to deal one on one with such a progressive disaster—a full-fledged transsexual that was so flamboyant about his imposition in our community, that he was audaciously challenging anybody to “judge” him incorrectly—because he was protected by law to be an imbecile. It wasn’t alright with her.
She endured the experience while transacting with the boy but shortly before leaving she just felt disgusted. So she proceeded to the customer service area to take back all her items and get her money back because she didn’t want to give money to a company that supported such behavior. She was appalled utterly. Of course the manager spoke to her and he basically stated that legally they were paralyzed from discriminating against the kid and that if they did, they feared a lawsuit—which I understand is exactly the case. The law handed down by Supreme courts both state and federal have given us these impositions and my wife was furious about it because now it was in her own back yard. The kid knew he was protected by law to harass the sensibilities of normal, average, good-hearted American morality, and she was fuming with anger over it. She gathered up the contact information to speak to corporate headquarters to complain then she headed to the optometrist to take back her very nice new glasses.
Luckily, the lady working the counter was a levelheaded older person who calmed her down. I won’t go into the details of what the lady told my wife—because I don’t want to get her into legal trouble—but the short story is this—the other employees working that day agreed with my wife—only they weren’t allowed to say anything about the kid. They were forced to put up with the little scum bag. By law, they have had their First Amendment rights taken away from them—the transsexual was allowed to harass everyone else, but nobody was allowed to harass him—by law. And Wal-Mart’s hands were tied behind their back while progressive attacks of middle-America punched them square in the face.
In the future, my wife simply won’t buy anything if she has to deal with people like that kid. He shouldn’t be anywhere that customers have to interact with him. This whole episode reminded me of a trip my family took to the Mellow Mushroom in West Chester. I like the pizza there, but often find the environment too progressive for my tastes. Now since Pies and Pints has opened at Liberty Center we choose to go there for fresh pizza instead of the Mellow Mushroom just because that Liberty Center environment is much more conservative. To be honest, when I am spending $70 to $100 dollars on food I expect an attractive waitress—and by attractive, I’d like her to be a young college girl with good hygiene, speaks in complete sentences, isn’t covered in tattoos and body piercings and is well within the appropriate weight for her height. If I end up with a guy, he needs to look well-groomed, have short hair without dandruff, and speak respectively. Usually it’s not a problem, and it’s certainly not sexual—it’s just that beat up old wrecks are not pleasant to be around. Younger people are like new cars off the assembly line, and when you are going out to eat, you want to see new cars, not vehicles ready for the junk yard. If we wanted to see that, we’d just stay home. Chili’s is particularly good about having a nice mix of such people—their recruiting is obviously successful. They can’t discriminate, but they manage to create a competitive environment to weed out the undesirables. But at the Mellow Mushroom of course they get progressive kids applying because the environment attracts those types of people—and that is the biggest turn-off for me. On one occasion, we had an openly gay waiter and he drove me nuts. He was so flamboyant that I almost left—he was really pushing the whole gay thing commenting on my daughter’s clothing along with sucking up to my wife. Of course, by reading this, you can get a sense of her state of mind. She hasn’t wanted to go back there since. I have under professional circumstances, but she hasn’t. We tend to vote with our feet, so these progressive trends have an impact on a company’s bottom-line. I considered the $150 dollars we spent there that day to be completely wasted money. We would have had much more fun popping in a frozen pizza into the oven at home—because at least then we wouldn’t have some gay guy hitting on us and doing who-knows-what to our food between the kitchen and our table.
That is precisely why progressive activists have pushed to have protected legislation allowing kids like that Wal-Mart transsexual to come into our neighborhoods and assault our sensibilities, but they expect not to receive any fire back in return. They—being the progressive activists deliberately dressing up in blue lipstick and a skirt with a push-up bra to work as cashier at Wal-Mart—intend harm to the lifestyle my wife and I have chosen for ourselves. They will of course say that we are being “judgmental” and are advocating “hate speech” because the law has empowered them with such beliefs. What the legal system and the politics that has shaped it neglect is that being “judgmental” is one of the greatest attributes of living as a human being. Progressive activists and the legal system are demanding that we stop thinking and just accept these incursions against tradition, and in my family, that is not acceptable. Not at all. If scum bags like this transsexual kid want to flaunt themselves in front of our faces, there will be consequences. They don’t have a right to impose themselves on our sensibilities. If they want to do what they do, they have a right—but through competition, we must have options to avoid them. I suggested to my wife that she not shop at Wal-Mart, that she stay in places where the prices are higher and along with them, the expectations of the clientele. But honestly, the Kroger Marketplace in Liberty Township has more than its share of these degenerates shopping there—the situation is endemic to the progressive incursion cast upon us by a political class that wishes to destroy the American family. She loves that particular Wal-Mart, so she wasn’t open to that idea. In the future if she doesn’t have options to avoid people like that transsexual employee, she just won’t shop that day. And that’s the way it’s going to be. When we go out to dinner, we don’t want a bunch of silly boys prancing around like girls expecting a 17% tip with their hands all over our food—and we don’t want to exchange money with people who look like their hands are disgusting—because if they dress that way—god only knows where their hands have been. We don’t claim to be modern or hip, we don’t like these changes to the family structure of American society and short of invoking an Amish privilege toward tradition—we certainly won’t be endorsing such lifestyles under any circumstances—especially, with our hard-won money. It is a shame that companies like Wal-Mart are so terrified of the legal implications of such justified discrimination based on sound judgment. Because if there were any justice in this world—those types of things wouldn’t happen in our town. I can see them happening in places writhe with filth, like Las Vegas, Key West, and the various swingers clubs around the world—but not in a family rich environment like Butler County. The legislators who allowed such things to happen should be ashamed of themselves for not having more courage to stand against progressive activists. Because that leaves the dirty work to people like me—which is not what we hired you politicians to do in the first place—cave to the worst among us, so that the good would have to just endure the folly.
Up until really the National Enquirer article I was not adamant that Ted Cruz should not be the presidential nominee. But after hearing him get the endorsements of people like Lindsey Graham, Jeb Bush, and after Cruz actually hired a Bush to work in his campaign, then witnessing all the dirty tricks that Ted played before Donald Trump hit back—like the hit piece on Melania—I have decided that under no circumstances am I going to support any sitting politicians for President. If someone holds a political position now or ever—I will not vote for them in the upcoming election. The political establishment is doing everything it can to protect itself from a rebellion they created because of their mass incompetence and dysfunction—and watching their behavior has made me sick of the process. I don’t believe any of them. It is obvious to me, and I’m hardly one who falls for disillusion and fantasy. Yet I have many friends, several who make livings thinking about this kind of stuff—some who actually work for Glenn Beck—who say they won’t vote for Donald Trump because he’s not a conservative. Well, I think Trump is a conservative in a very liberal part of the country. He may not be Montana conservative, but he is certainly bold enough to call himself a Republican in the very blue state of New York. People can argue and debate all they want, but Trump has a wealth building track record that you can see and touch. Cruz does not. Instead you get conspiratorial information about Ted Cruz when you do a little digging—and it’s not good—like the following videos. Watch them all then decide if you really believe that Ted Cruz is what he says he is.
If there was anything I liked about Ted Cruz it was during his filibuster speech in front of the Senate where he mentioned Ayn Rand. Like Paul Ryan he claims to be a fan—which gave me hope for both of them really. But then again, so was Glenn Beck—and all those people have missed the point she was trying to make. Ted Cruz is no closer to living in the world of Galt’s Gulch than Jessie Jackson and now that he is being pressed as one of two front runners—his story is breaking down. This is why we have a long primary season and why running for president is so difficult. Everyone has to be vetted and we need to see how these people act when they start sweating. Cruz has not done well. Even if he didn’t cheat on his wife with five women—he didn’t do a very good job of stepping out in front of the story. His body language was obviously implicating him behind the tough talk. He came across to me like the kid seen in the below video who blamed Donald Trump for putting teeth marks in a chair. Trump because he is the political outsider—is a convenient punching bag—and Cruz’s team uses dirty tricks too much against him in a passive aggressive manner. They played dirty with Ben Carson, and several others as well. Then when they tried to appeal to Mormons in Utah with Holy-roller ads using a naked Melania to smear Trump, it was obvious to me that when pressed as a possible president, Cruz would behave in the same fashion.
Of course Cruz wants to debate Trump one on one—it is his strongest aptitude. Trump would be crazy to fall for the invite—to give a competitor a chance by playing to his strength. That is not how you win competitions conservatives—you must exploit the weaknesses of your rival—you don’t prop them up. Cruz is a great debater on policy and all the things that politicians talk about. But what has he done in his life that says he could do anything but talk? We’ve heard the talk before and look where it’s gotten us. No, we need now a man of action and I don’t think there is a single one in public office these days within the Washington D.C. culture who can do the job of president. There are a few here and there around the country that gives me hope for the republic, but not enough to matter at the federal level yet. We are in a gunless rebellion right now. Instead of casualties and collateral damage we are seeing people lose or gain their careers. That you could say is a more humane way of dealing with insurgents who have failed at their jobs of running the country—and they neurotically respond as if they’d rather die than just lose a social status. But this rebellion has to happen. We either take back our country through an election or we do it with some militia organized force—but things cannot continue as they have. And what I’ve seen out of Ted Cruz is that he’s part of the system—not fighting against it. Even if Cruz did love the novel Atlas Shrugged—being married to the spouse that he has now would prevent him from acting philosophically from it—which makes him no more effective in government than one of the Bush presidents or the worthless senators like Graham.
Then there was Cruz’s little speech about strong women as he defended his wife Heidi from the wrath of Donald Trump after Ted threw the first punch. Not that women have to be barefoot and pregnant, and must spend all their time in the kitchen caring for their families to have value, but Cruz did not sound very conservative to me. There is this whole metrosexual revolution of men who do cooking for their wives and share in the domestic tasks like doing laundry that are derived from the whole progressive push to make everyone equal, and Cruz like a lot of men are a part of it. In human society the only real differences between men and women are those regarding the sexual roles—that really is it. If we all placed our brains on a table and took away all the physicality, only then would we truly be equal. But with physical bodies, we have roles on earth that point straight into the bedroom. For instance, most women like to take the submissive role in sex, and therefore, they like to pamper their men with domestic obligations—but only if that man has went out into the world and conquered it in some fashion—with either a big paycheck, or in protecting the family from some disturbance. Men and women must respect each other, but the roles they play in their family life are like foreplay to what happens in the bedroom. In the most biologically primal fashion that directly leads to a happy sex life, women like to know that a man is changing the tire on the family car and the man likes to see his woman cooking the dinner he worked so hard to put on the table. That respect leads to a healthy sex life of mutual fulfillment. In this modern age of high divorce rates and mousey men who share all the cooking and laundry duties with their wives—they don’t understand why the women in their lives don’t want to plop up on the hood of their car in their garage and have spontaneous sex. It is because the women don’t respect men who endorse all those beta male attributes. Of course there are exceptions—and some people make it work through sheer will—but biologically we are all wired the same way through our physical bodies—and so long as we live on earth together—those rules apply to everything we do. Trump understands those rules—Cruz certainly doesn’t and you can see it on Heidi’s face—she is suffering. Most women in Heidi’s position use career to substitute the closeness they lack with their husbands. These days’ women have been taught from little girls that this progressive method is the way they must conduct their lives—so they usually enter marriage confused as to their roles within the family. But just a note to men in general, if you have to get your wife drunk to want to have sex, you are screwing up your romantic life with her. Men in that situation need to change things for the benefit of the woman. Society won’t acknowledge this problem, but it’s quite obvious—and it is destroying an entire generation of relationships. Ted Cruz came out in his chastisement of Donald Trump sounding like a silly soccer dad justifying his own personal failures—and it was certainly pathetic. It wasn’t presidential, and it certainly wasn’t “conservative.”
That of course brings us back to Donald Trump and the Cruz supporters who declare that the New York billionaire isn’t a conservative. Trump is rich and he didn’t get that way giving away money. He has a happy housewife at home taking care of his family. Trump is pro gun, pro border security, against Common Core, and favors lowering taxes with an aggressive plan that might actually work. He is decisive and a natural leader and never backs down from a fight. What’s not to like? And he has a track record of accomplishment both good and bad–we can see what we are buying with him. With Cruz, who says he’s the ultimate conservative—what do we really know? Because when you peek under the hood there is a lot not to like—he’s underpowered, feminized, and all talk. The holes in Cruz are showing. If he’s a true conservative then we are in a lot of trouble. Because he does a lot of things and holds positions that are quite contrary to true conservatism—and you can see that in his campaign. And now that too much has been said, there is no going back for me. If the Republican Party does not embrace Donald Trump I’m done with them. If there is anybody but a pure independent from the political establishment in the White House—then I’m done with the process and will turn from elections into Sam Adams. Look people, I’m not a Constitutionalist—I think the Hamilton version of the founding documents was entirely too liberal. I’m an Anti-Federalist by that old definition and if there is movement in the Constitution—it won’t be more toward a socialist state like Obama presents as an option—it will be further to the right—the way that Thomas Jefferson always intended. Because only in that manner can we get to what we were supposed to always be in America—and Trump is the means to get there. Cruz is just more of the same. We don’t need another scandalous preacher from the White House. We need someone who knows how to manage others—something no politician has shown me they are able to do—because they just don’t have the skill set to accomplish the task. Ted Cruz has been nothing but a public servant his whole life. He’s hardly an outsider. He’s simply sold himself that way—and I’m not buying—under any condition. The Glenn Beck types are wrong. They need to go back and re-read Atlas Shrugged. Cruz isn’t any of the characters in Atlantis. He’s at the table with Wesley Mouch. Actually, Ted’s wife is—while the presidential candidate is doing the dishes.
If I wanted to, I could probably have a pretty successful career in talk radio. I do occasional guest spots here and there and have in the past made talk radio a big part of communicating hard ideas to people. But, on the front end, it doesn’t pay much money until you build up a syndicated show, and honestly, I don’t have time for that. It is one of many things that I have as a substantial talent wheelhouse that I enjoy. With all that said it does sometimes surprise me that I say things well ahead of the curve before mainstream audiences are prepared to understand them. I don’t listen to the big talk radio people every day—sometimes I go years without listening because I am busy with my own things—but independently—often—I come to conclusions at the same time as many of the big names—like Rush Limbaugh. That gives me often a feeling of self-satisfaction in knowing that the things I often say are on target—and not some random thought barely dangling from reality. If I say something, then a big name talk radio guy says something similar—arrived at independently—it is a good sign that you’re on the right track.
But I felt a little sorry for Rush Limbaugh and his many millions of listeners as he played a clip from CNN’s Chris Cuomo spouting off the benefits of communism as President Obama’s rapturous trip to Cuba unleashed a pent-up orgasm from the political left toward the long-awaited day of fulfillment. As the world burned in Brussels due to terrorism, Obama was getting pictures of himself in front of Che murals and doing the wave at a Cuban baseball game. Obama and his supporters who have sweat sweet love for communism for years were unable to contain their excitement and were showing mainstream America what has always been going on within the Democrat party and all progressive affiliations. The sound bites and Rush Limbaugh’s reaction to it are in the above clip. He was noticeably caught off guard by the love fest toward communism—because as a person who does nothing but analyze the news every day from a conservative view—he had underestimated the level of socialism and communism that has been percolating in America for several decades—really since the 1930s—aggressively. The communist efforts with strategic implementation peaked during the 1960s on college campuses, and then subsided a bit by the time Ronald Reagan was elected president and went back underground for a while. It emerged again in small doses during the Clinton presidency—for which Rush Limbaugh made his name so popular. It went’ back underground during Bush the younger’s presidency especially in the wake of 9/11 terrorism and concerns over the War in Iraq—and other places. But always brimming under the surface was a progressive push toward socialism then communism—it was evident in the No Child Left Behind act signed by George W. Bush, it was also in the creation of new governmental departments like the TSA and Homeland security—all ushered in on the back of mismanaged crises. Socialism from both political parties was what led to the 2008 recession as government had been making bad loans all in the name of “equality” and bailing out companies “too big to fail.” The American people elected a socialist in Obama because the emphasis was on “equality” not merit and the rest is history leading up to this Cuba visit—which for an admirer of communism—appears to be one of Obama’s lifelong goals hatched among his Marxist friends at the University of Chicago in the company of his friend—the terrorist Bill Ayers.
Well before I ever wrote on this site—more than six years ago as of this writing—I talked about these things. People thought it was a bit conspiratorial. People sometimes looked at me cross-eyed and whispered behind my back often—but it didn’t change the facts. Those who know me well understand that I’m far from some tin-hated conspiracy theorist. I’m usually always right when I say something and if I care enough to reveal it to somebody—I feel pretty strongly about it. It has always been a gift of mine to see right through the thick of things beyond layers of deceit to the truth which is always carefully hidden. Most adults tell “little white lies” about just about everything and I am extremely good at breaking down reality very quickly to discover the truth of a matter. When I listen to people say things I am always listening to what they don’t say behind the words. To me that is the most important voice—and believe me—there are always hidden things behind all forms of communication ranging from body language to Freudian slips of the tongue by selecting certain words to use under specific conditions. Most of the time the person speaking doesn’t consciously realize they give away hints as to what they are hiding, but like a dog whistle that only I can hear—I pluck from their depths the evidence.
Public schools have for a long time been teaching socialism—and I have always spoken out against it. Any time a teacher tells a student such as they do starting now in pre-school—that it is the obligation of a child to “share” their toys with others—that school is committed to teaching socialism with the hope that someday that student will embrace communism and vote for some political person like Bernie Sanders or the entire city council of Seattle, Oregon. These days most of our music is subtly advocating socialist ideals, most of our movies–especially films like the Best Picture movie from last year that I enjoyed a lot called—Birdman. Socialism is communicated from virtually every sector of our modern society and I have been pointing it out for as long as I can remember.
It’s often easy for people to forget about the hidden messages because they like the product wrapping it comes in. For instance with Birdman—which was a very good film that was metaphorical to the real life events of Michael Keaton who started all these superhero movies with the 1989 movie Batman—the film direction was so interesting that many of the little socialist messages were easy to ignore because the product was so entertaining. But the movie did hit all the usual “Best Picture” categories required to win an Academy Award—it had a lesbian scene, it showed the protagonist at war with his I.D. and his collective consciousness, it attacked the nature of art valued in this case by a stage play on Broadway compared to the blockbuster status of a Hollywood film career. The movie Birdman was very good at doing what it set out to do. But I also noticed a little rebellion in the movie—the director clearly knew what he was doing—while appealing to the Hollywood left of the Academy—making a movie he knew they would like—he at the end tipped his hat toward capitalism. It was very subtle, but he did it in clear rebellion of the socialist trend—and I’m seeing this more often from several Hollywood directors. At the end, not to give anything away when Michael Keaton’s daughter looks to see if her father had jumped out of a window to commit suicide. Instead of seeing a mangled body down below she looked up at the birds flying above and smiled as if acknowledging that her father was flying with them. Metaphorically of course she meant to imply that he had decided to give up the ridiculous art of his theater career and embrace his Birdman heroic persona crafted by the Hollywood blockbuster culture which was the central conflict of the entire picture. Does art mean personal fulfillment in material possessions acquired or is itself sacrificial in going to the extreme of blowing off one’s nose in front of a live audience to commit suicide on stage to show the world the extremes he would go to be an “artist?” Michael Keaton answered the question—he became the physical manifestation of who he really was in the end even though any Hollywood leftists would obviously miss the point. Birdman is a brilliant movie! Watch it!
I see more film directors now than ever putting subtle messages in favor of capitalism in their films that are meant to be concealed. It used to be the other way around, which is why the Chris Cuomo references were so shocking to Rush. We all grew up on certain kinds of influences, and in American culture, movies and music are huge reflections of our culture so unless you know what you are looking for, it is easy to miss. For instance, go back and watch the original Robocop and the anti capitalist messages are quite obvious—the villains are capitalists and the good guys are public sector employees. Still a good movie—but the subtle influence shaping the elements is obvious. Dirty Dancing had a harsh anti-Ayn Rand message, Dances with Wolves an obvious progressive dialogue that fully embraced Native American versions of westward expansion—which directly led to political legislation. The list goes on forever really—those are just a few examples.
But the pro-communist message has been spread for decades very quietly and carefully, and not even Rush Limbaugh understood the enormity of it. Conservatives have always joked about it, but assumed that the situation was overstated in regard to Democrats. It wasn’t. If anything, even people like me understated it because it forced us to admit that there were domestic enemies that were seeking to topple the United States from within and that they were our neighbors, our teachers, our firefighters and other public servants—which was just too much to deal with. It is much easier to think good of things than to admit that there might be a problem. It’s similar to the wife married to an alcoholic where the abusive husband is in denial. America has been in denial that the political left always intended communism—even many on the left themselves. But now that Obama is in Cuba—Marxism has infested the thinking of the entire Islamic community and is inspiring terrorism against “western—capitalist” targets, it was too much for Rush Limbaugh to even admit. A sitting president was in Cuba at a baseball game with a known criminal dictator as Brussels exploded with terror. Many thought Obama should come home and address the nation. Instead he was having the time of his life doing the wave in a Cuban crowd with a Castro communist. It might have shocked Rush Limbaugh—and I understand it, but it didn’t shock me. It only confirmed what I have been saying for decades. My only reason for reminding people about it now is in the hope that they will shut up and listen in the future. When I tell you something dear reader—you better listen. I don’t write all these things to make money. I do it to save the human race—because what good is money if nobody is around to use it.
The Overmanwarrior 