How stupid are the Democrats? Well, they have a difficulty doing the easy things correctly, and completely ignore the hard stuff—because as a party they lack the skills and leadership to conduct themselves properly. The only thing they are good at is creating celebrity and charging premium money to raise money for their war chests, which is what the latest round from Wikileaks revealed. Not even ABC News could sit on this story because it is just so embarrassing for the Democrats. Watch it here.
I can’t say that the other side doesn’t do similar things. I have been a part of that world a little bit. Recently Donald Trump came to town and it cost a sizable amount of money to have dinner with him and I was able to see that close up. I occasionally get invited to some of these VIP events, and I enjoy them from the perspective of philosophy. In Trump’s case, it was obvious that he felt uncomfortable with the arrangement—but had come to the conclusion that to a certain extent, this is how the game is played in politics. With Trump, he genuinely looked hungry to change that system—because the pay to play system is part of what makes politics so despicable. Once Trump makes the money through fundraising that the Republicans need to hold their seats in the house and senate, he won’t be selling celebrity the way that the Democrats have been caught doing. He doesn’t need to.
What’s so embarrassing for the Democrats is that they champion themselves as socialist advocates for the poor, but what the recordings show is that they sell access to the largest contributors and they really don’t care about people with hard luck. I can honestly say because of some of my VIP experiences with Republicans that it’s not the same way with them. The big difference I think is that most of the people who are Republicans are self-made people who have the type of money to be VIPs. With Democrats, they tend to have old money, or “lottery money” fueling their efforts—like Hollywood actors, and those who have fallen into financial resources by luck. So they are quicker and more eager to throw it away on the celebrity of a dinner with Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama than Republicans are. With Republicans the pitch is obviously different—but the effort is disgusting in all of politics and needs to be changed. That change will never happen under Hillary Clinton. Under Trump, likely, because he already has all that financial celebrity—meeting him first hand I can say that he doesn’t like that pay to play system of what is supposed to be a representative government. But the Democrats, they love that system because it gives them a value for their lives that they don’t have naturally—and it’s a tremendous ego boost—allowing them to believe they are more valuable than they really are.
That is largely the reason why Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are tone-deaf to the world around them because what they see often are people spending small fortunes just to meet them. That is the tremendous downside to these Wikileak recordings and why it’s so embarrassing for them. And for the system to change, you’ll never get that out of the biggest perpetrators of that exploitation. You have to do something different, and for a change, the Republicans are leading the way.
Elizabeth Banks forgot to mention the most important attribute to being a Hollywood actress as she told the story during her ridiculous mockery of Donald Trump’s spectacular entrance at the RNC convention. She spoke about meeting her husband at a Bill Clinton rally, and spoke the talking points about the Democrats being responsible for public schools and other social programs—ironically, the same failures that caused most of the arena to sit there looking at her like they were stoned on pot as she spoke—and caused the Bernie Sanders supporters to actually leave the arena after Hillary was nominated—products of the public school system. She forgot to mention that to be a successful Hollywood actress you have to be willing to take off your cloths—and be an essentially soft porn model, and you have to be a progressive Democrat—otherwise producers will not hire you for a job if you are a woman—especially over 30 years old.
Her speech and mockery of Trump was so bad that she showed her only real value is to be one of those soft porn actresses for Hollywood productions. She is like one of those high school practice girls, the sluts that young boys learn sex from—but never want to marry. Once people no longer want to see her in a sexualized way in Hollywood films—she’s done and she showed that on stage.
Her attempted Trump walk shows she can’t act, not even with satire—and her pandering to the left-leaning Hollywood base will only last as long as the next election. They will hold it against her later—so she embarrassed herself for nothing, just like the high school slut who gives it all up to some pubescent teenager only to be overlooked for a diamond ring and a shared bed later. Elizabeth Banks showed herself to be the sleazy Hollywood bimbo that we all know she is. And she wasn’t even funny.
Listening to Bill Clinton’s speech, you can tell they are all guilty when they can’t address the issues directly, but choose some “high road” as a means to defend themselves. If they weren’t so guilty of so many criminal escapades, they would defend themselves more valiantly, but they can’t, and even the socialists Millennials who were Bernie supporters know it—which is actually quite sad. For instance, the number one concern that most in the world have right now is ISIS—yet on day one of the DNC convention nobody mentioned it. But that is just the tip of the iceberg with these idiots. Obviously I’m not a fan, but even so, it is amazing how jagged their convention is both inside and out. The videos above show what’s really going on—and not even the national media outlets can avoid the specifics. Those tricks simply don’t work anymore. By the end of the week, I don’t see Hillary getting a bump in the polls. I think she’ll actually lose ground because the idiocy of the DNC convention cannot be ignored. Normal people are seeing what a bunch of losers are attending and running it—and when you can’t even appease the anarchists and the socialists—you have a real problem if you are the Democratic Party.
With a lot of pleading by the DNC to keep the protesters at their Philadelphia event appearing somewhat content—so that the “picture” they wanted to paint of a “unified convention could be realized—the obsession they have with criminal and manipulative content cannot be ignored. They have been busted yet again with Wikileaks revealing 20,000 emails showing how much manipulation they do within the media and how they essentially rig the American election system. Yet, they are seeking to steer away the attention to the Russians for discovering the information. The problem for them is that they actually committed the acts—whether it was the Russians or some school kid tucked away in some college dorm who did the hacking is irrelevant. It is their behavior behind closed doors that matters. This video shows some of the information that isn’t being covered by the media that is obviously in collusion with the DNC scam—and it needs to be seen by voters.
What this reminds me of is the strategy utilized against all the women Bill Clinton slept with as president. The DNC has the same approach away from their misconduct toward those simply reporting what they see. These are bad people who have no place in any office of trust under any circumstance.
Listen to this scum bag, long-nosed, douche bag, little prick Bill Maher make fun of Donald Trump and his children. These are the type of people who are ruining America in favor of a progressive vision rooted in European secularism. He is such a little piece of scum who has done nothing in his life of any meaning except host a television show that he landed so that he could advance a progressive agenda. He’s a professional whiner who could be beaten down so easily physically or intellectually and the only reason he runs his mouth is because everyone has been too polite to stoop to his level. But if he ever comes my way, I’d be happy to take his little bitch ass on in any form he chooses. People like this are the worst kind of loser. He doesn’t deserve to live in the United States.
The Nathan Drake adventures on the Playstation game systems have reminded me often of my experiences from 1983 through 1988. I love the games and the character of Nathan Drake. Up until recently I thought Uncharted 2: Among Thieves was one of the greatest video games ever made. The video game company Naughty Dog actually did something unthinkable, they are challenging great movie characters like Indiana Jones for the right to be king of the storytelling venue, and up until Uncharted 4: A Thieves End—which just came out in May of 2016 I thought they were scratching the surface. However, I have given myself some time recently to play the 4th game, with great anticipation on my part. Even though in my life I have shelved many of the traits about Nathan Drake’s life which remind me so much of my early years I deeply wanted to see how Naughty Dog would end the story of that very likable character—as this is slated to be the end of the series as we know it. After playing Uncharted 4 let me report that it is jaw dropping great. I had high expectations but even so, it far exceeded those in every way. By the time the credits concluded I had a very similar feeling as I did the very first time I saw Raiders of the Lost Ark, only this was better, because the game was much longer and had time to jump into the lives of the characters in a storytelling fashion that I think was Academy Award winning. The acting and pacing was so good that it rivals the best films Hollywood has ever produced—like Citizen Kane for set design and drama, or James Bond for sheer action and scope of circumstance. As just an example of how good the game is, how it looks and how magnificent it is the video below is actual game play. It looks like a movie but I can confirm that everything you see is a playable element. It is quite astonishing.
If you have not yet played the game you may want to return to this article once you have as spoilers will follow. I thought there were a number of elements about Uncharted 4 that were quite extraordinary story wise, and those items will be discussed—so if you don’t want to know, stop here.
Was I happy with the ending? Actually, I was amazed by the ending. It was so refreshing, that an entertainment company actually produced a story that featured strong characters with healthy relationships. It was good to see that Nate and his wife actually lived happily ever after—that the events of the previous games were really about Nathan Drake coming to terms with his past and living a healthy future. And it was nice to see that they gave birth to a daughter who was living a successful life with them. Nathan Drake managed to also maintain positive relationships with his brother and his father figure mentor Sully as the years after Uncharted 4 progressed. It was the happiest ending I’ve seen since the conclusion of the very first Back to the Future movie—it was satisfying in every way. My wife and I kind of looked at each other after the story concluded because honestly it was like Naughty Dog had been spying on our own lives together over the years even down to the characters of the new daughters. I was certainly able to relate to the ending—to say the least. I was so pleased that millions of video game players were able to experience these Nathan Drake adventures which featured such positive role models and outcomes. No wonder the game is so popular—the ending showed me that video games have become the dominate form of storytelling in our modern culture surpassing movies and novels finally. In a lot of ways Uncharted 4 is the greatest story ever told—it is certainly the greatest treasure hunt surpassing Raiders of the Lost Ark or even Humphrey Bogart’s Treasure of Sierra Madre. The people at Naughty Dog knew what they were doing and they pulled it off with sheer audacity. Such a good ending to the story of Nathan Drake—especially for those who have spent the last ten years enjoying the Uncharted franchise. Hollywood would have never dared to give fans such a positive ending.
What started as a rip off of the Tomb Raider franchise—which was a female rip-off of Indiana Jones, Uncharted had evolved into its own thing by the third video game. Even the makers of the Tomb Raider games had realized that Uncharted was literally going someplace nobody had thought previously possible. So by the time Naughty Dog set out to do Uncharted 4, they were truly in “uncharted” territory for any storytelling medium. The game designers appeared to be aware that they were laying foundations that every video game and movie company in the future would have to live up to and they were enjoying it. There were times where they were actually showing off their technical abilities just because they could.
Libertalia was very interesting in that it actually fits politically into the discussion of our times—really the philosophic difference between libertarians, and the Tea Party movement. What a lot of people don’t know is that the American Revolution was ignited by the actions of these very pirates central to the Uncharted 4 story so I consider the narrative an important one which shaped the actual Libertalia which become America. But for the founders of Libertalia, what a concept, a utopian paradise founded by renegades from all the world governments and all the possible problems that might arise from it. I found the entire concept extremely compelling. Then to walk around that environment in a 3D world was really something to behold. The sense of scale was truly incredible. These Uncharted makers obviously have experience with real world adventures as their physics through caves, with rappelling and climbing and geography was spot on—nearly real world in their feel. If not for some of the over-the-top gun battles, and climbing, Uncharted 4 could be a simulation of real life.
It’s really hard to pick a favorite part of the game for me, because after I was finished, it seemed like a really long journey. I took my time getting through the game—spending about three weekends completing it. Ironically, I think the chapter where Nathan and his brother break into the old mansion to get back their mother’s personal possessions was the most compelling, which I didn’t expect. Nathan’s mother supposedly committed suicide when he was very young forcing him to grow up in an orphanage run by nuns. Uncharted 4 opens with Drake and his brother in a Panamanian jail and it is very gritty. Through the series Drake is in many jails yet he’s highly intelligent walking a very fine line between ghetto thug and world-class traveler. So it was interesting and realistic to learn that Nathan’s mother was a genius scholar who had obviously brushed elbows with powerful people and something bad happened to her. Her absence in the lives of her children obviously sent them down a dark path leaving them with relationship troubles later in their lives as they had been a relatively happy family. As young children that happiness was ripped from them and they spent the rest of their days trying to get it back which culminated around the secret treasure of Henry Avery—a character of obsession for their mother. I thought that the Naughty Dog team went so much further than Spielberg could in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in taking such an interesting globetrotting adventurer and grounding him into something internally driven by overbearing parents and childhood disappointments. Even in the Panamanian jail, Drake and his brother seem too smart for their circumstances, but psychologically damaged by their upbringing. Apparently they got just enough from their mother to be smart and inquisitive young people, but not enough to stay out of trouble. The story was to me, deeply intelligent.
And that is the triumph of Uncharted 4, not just as a Playstation only video game, but as a mechanism for storytelling. It is a shame that such a magnificent story doesn’t have the ability to reach everyone, but it certainly does justify the expense of buying a PS4 just so that people can play this video game. It is worth every penny the cost of not only the game at $60 dollars, but the $300 cost of a PS4. I haven’t played many of these types of games over the last five or six years. Previous favorites were Red Dead Redemption and of course Star Wars: The Old Republic. But this Uncharted game is just another step in creating virtual realities and telling stories in those realms. Recently after buying a Samsung 4K 70” television the first thing I wanted to do was get an updated gaming system so I could catch up on some of the new titles that have been produced in the video game world. The highest on my list was Uncharted 4 which was coming up at the time. With that said, the game was gorgeous blown up big and in 4K—nearly flawless. It really was a game that hit every mark on a high note and was something truly to behold and enjoy. If you get the chance, take the adventure. It’s not the only reason I spent 5K on an entertainment system, but I would do it again just to play Uncharted 4 once. It will last in your mind for a lifetime. It is my new favorite video game, and one of my most beloved adventure stories. It has the depth of an adventure novel, the action of a summer blockbuster, and the romance of an Academy Award winning motion picture. I really don’t think Douglas Fairbanks or Errol Flynn could have ever imagined the type of storytelling exhibited in Uncharted 4. It is a new gold standard that will certainly stand the test of time and is one of the greatest adventure stories EVER told. What a great experience Naughty Dog! Thanks!
Do yourself a favor and watch the videos included above. The effort put into Uncharted 4 is just incredible, and it certainly shows—an A+ in every single category.
Watching the special session of congressional investigation into the James Comey FBI ruling on the Hillary Clinton email problems the essence is this—Comey felt that the Attorney General history over 99 years of patterned behavior that a case of this nature would not have been taken under the presumption of “intent.” Everything else said is irrelevant. It was obvious that Comey felt that Clinton had done a bad job of protecting her secure emails as Secretary of State and that she seriously jeopardized her credibility. Yet he did not advance the recommendation of prosecution because he felt the case was too flimsy for an AG at a Department of Justice to proceed with.
Here’s the problem with Comey’s statement—attorney generals are extremely political so their prosecution ratios if the charges are leveled toward characters on their political side of the aisle are of course extremely poor. It is no surprise that Comey made the political calculation that his case was not strong enough to by-pass the politics of the AG, Loretta Lynch. Yet, on Friday, July 1st Loretta Lynch under pressure from the disgrace of her meeting with Bill Clinton—Hillary’s husband—she stated clearly that she would accept any recommendation that the FBI proposed. So it goes on July 5th 2016 James Comey held a press conference stating that the FBI would not bring charges against Hillary Clinton because they could not prove that she “intended” to break the law. (Because all that evidence had been destroyed by Hillary’s team of lawyers)
When pressed by the congressional investigation specially held under an emergency session on July 7th 2016 however, Comey fell on the historical tendency of prosecution under the DOJ over a long period of time as the reason he did not recommend prosecution—even though Loretta Lynch already stated that she would proceed. So there was no question that the Department of Justice would proceed with the case which is contrary to Comey’s statements defending his position. That is the key to this case. Comey in spite of all his declarations about the importance of his integrity lied about his reasons for not moving forward with the prosecution. The DOJ would have had no choice but to pursue the case because Bill and Loretta Lynch got caught together in an inappropriate way.
Hey, how do I know these things you ask? Well, I recently stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. I’ve read a little law and I deal with lawyers more than I’d care to. Gotta’ watch how they twist the meanings of words.
The vile liberal and crooked political insider Hillary Clinton hid behind her feminine gender to advocate outright socialism at the sacred Museum Center in Cincinnati, Ohio on 6/27/2016. Her message drew out the same type of liberals as the diabolical levy school levy supporters, abortion seekers, and man hating socialist insurgents raised as bra burners from college campuses breathing marijuana smoke who see government as a free babysitting service and personal sugar daddy. Elizabeth Warren the ultra-progressive economy hating out-of-touch college professor from Princeton was with Clinton to attack the fundamental mechanisms of American money-making prowess with their Lenin-like diatribes against capitalism. Have a listen and consider that these idiots want to be in charge of the American economy. What a travesty to think that people like Clinton and Warren have the ear of so many stupid people—that they are taking advantage of the low information voters who cheered them on with promises that they could never keep, because what they advocated was essentially Lenin brand communism from Russia’s 1917 Revolution. Hillary often refers to traditionalists as wanting to go back in time to “better days,” but for the aims of progressivism, they have been at it for over 100 years now and their intentions were never clearer.
Before there was ever a Donald Trump in politics, I was doing much of what has had success with in speaking bluntly about people who are diabolical for the American experience. The proof is in the article shown below from City Beat Magazine in March of 2012 where I drew a lot of fire for calling people like Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren “latté sipping prostitutes with asses the size of car tires and diamond rings to match.” I was the original—make sure that is known because I had been saying things to that degree for many years prior to Donald Trump’s recent foray into politics. It is good to see someone like him finally challenging these idiots who hide their diabolical schemes behind gender politics. Vile people should not be discriminated against just because they happen to be females. I say all that with pride because often it takes more courage to speak against those who have been empowered through sex, race, or economic status to destroy the nation I love. And it is a relief to finally have more people speaking out against these insurgents now than there were in the past. I have been doing it for a long time and know quite a bit about what I’m talking about.
Neither politician speaking at the Museum Center knows anything about money, but only how to extract it from others through taxation or a form of prostitution called political fundraising—where candidates turn tricks in exchange for money. Those “tricks” may not be overtly sexual. However, occasionally a Vegas whore sometimes is paid just to sit with a client to give them access—and what Hillary does is no different. Her marriage is a shame, her life has always been for sale, and she has no roots into a moral foundation. She is a direct student of the guy who dedicated his book to Lucifer—Saul Alinsky. She married into power and will do anything to obtain it over others. She is exactly what the American Constitution was designed to protect us all from.
Clinton’s comments about businesses and corporations were disgusting. She represents the worst that the world has to offer on the side of reason. On one side of her mouth she will do anything for money, then on the other she decries those who earn the money through wealth building as a selfish enterprise. She is like the dirty whore who feels so guilty about what she has done to earn money that she can only belittle those with it because she can’t look herself in the mirror any other way—as only guilt stares back from the abyss of many shameful years of lies and deceit. Hillary is the embodiment of self-hatred and she uses progressive political platforms to hide that element of herself from her own consciousness.
The Museum Center should be ashamed of itself for letting her speak in that sacred Cincinnati center. I love that particular building which finds itself always struggling for funding. Even with all the nice museums they have there and the wonderful Ominmax theater, the Museum Center is always short on funds and often have to turn toward the tax payers for a bail out. So it is fairly disgusting that they allowed Hillary to use that place as a platform for her campaign. By doing so they allowed her to taint the place dirtying it up for half the population that hate her—not a good way to promote future economic growth at the Museum Center. As much as I like the place, it has way too many liberals running around and those types of people only know how to ask for money, they don’t know how to make it. With Hillary speaking there it is like all the wrong people getting together to talk about things they know nothing about, then cheering like idiots at their lack of success. The Museum Center needs to expand their base, not further isolating it from half the population that considers itself conservative—capitalist loving voters. Allowing Hillary to whore herself on full display within its sacred walls is not the best way to accomplish that task.
Hilary Clinton is the worst kind of whore—worse than any 20-year-old escort, Key West stripper, or Vegas showgirl—she is a whore who thinks she’s on the right side of history espousing a communist commitment meant to destroy the whole world over a century ago through any means necessary—then trying to hide the evil of her ways through good deeds paid for by money she stole from those who worked hard to make it. She is a whore to her husband—who is a maniacal cheater. She is a whore to her political party. Hillary is a whore to the United Nations. She is a whore to Obama. But worse yet, she’s a whore to herself—her life is a lie, her ethics are like pasted on makeup from a street-walker ending her night smelling like spit and discharged bodily fluids—they can be wiped away with a simple shower. Hillary’s beliefs ae completely formed around the flow of money into her pockets—yet she has the audacity to spew hatred toward money. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s not money that Hillary hates—or capitalism. Its herself—and what she has been willing to do to get her hands on it. Hillary is a simple whore who hates those who have paid her so much money over the years. And she thinks nobody sees—and half the nation doesn’t. But half the nation does, and they hate her for what she is—the whore that we all see hiding behind anything she can to conceal the truth.
If you want to see a real rally, go to this one.
Rich —
Please join Mr. Trump in this Tuesday for a rally in St. Clairsville, Ohio.
This line could have been straight out of any classic dystopian novel, whether it be Animal Farm, Brave New World, The Fountainhead, or Atlas Shrugged. Actually it reminds me of the wry satire of a Terry Gilliam film like Brazil, or George Lucas’ THX-1138. Yet it was the offered critic of the reasoning behind the killer in England of Jo Cox—the beloved leftist politician who happened to be murdered a week ahead of the critical vote on whether or not to leave the European Union and reclaim their national sovereignty from the gross mismanagement of the socialist bureaucrats in Brussels.
“Many people who suffer from mental illness are socially isolated and disconnected from society, feelings of worthlessness are alleviated by doing voluntary work.
So that is “their” explaination on the matter? It sounds eerily like the profile of the Orlando shooter. I couldn’t help but think back to my school days—of which I rebelled heavily—and recall the thoughts I had of the entire public education system, rule through peer pressure and drive the herd toward mass collectivism which makes it easy for a central authority to administer. That is precisely what we have here just hours after a legitimate tragedy of a young political star. Despite her politics, Jo Cox seemed like a nice sincere lady who meant well. But also common mainly caused by long-term unemployment.
“All these problems are
the political class for which she belonged cared much more for what they could get out of her martyrdom than what the individual life lost of her presence accounted for. Here is the rest of the story in case you missed it. The slant of the report is more telling than the content.
Update — Suspected killer may have had “mental health problems”, in receipt of “psychotherapy and medication”
The suspected killer of MP Jo Cox has been named locally as Thomas Mair, who has featured in a number of local news reports in recent years as a mentally ill man who claimed to be benefitting from local voluntary opportunities.
An archived 2010 article about a country park which welcomed Mr. Mair from the Pathways Day Centre for adults with mental health problems to volunteer in building a “faith garden” reported Mr. Mair as saying: “I can honestly say it has done me more good than all the psychotherapy and medication in the world.
“Many people who suffer from mental illness are socially isolated and disconnected from society, feelings of worthlessness are also common mainly caused by long-term unemployment.
“All these problems are alleviated by doing voluntary work.
“Getting out of the house and meeting new people is a good thing, but more important in my view is doing physically demanding and useful labour.
“When you have finished there is a feeling of achievement which is emotionally rewarding and psychologically fulfilling.
“For people for whom full-time, paid employment is not possible for a variety of reasons, voluntary work offers a socially positive and therapeutic alternative.”
The political left in both the Orlando case of the mass shooting there and the English case of an assassinated political figure is that loners are the problem, not the failures of their open border policies, their economic philosophy or their inability to use legislation to create a utopian existence. There were gun laws that were extreme in England and yet that didn’t prevent the murder of Jo Cox in city street. (The Manchurian Candidate in the wake of this tragedy seems less like fiction given the proximity to such an important election) Rather, the political left—particularly the socialist progressives point to those who are outside of their direct control as the culprits—lone wolves who stay to themselves and don’t socially “assimilate” toward group conduct.
From my own grade school days to the present, of nearly five decades, I tend to look down on people who “need” social assimilation. I see them as incomplete people. I don’t harbor hatred for them, or seek to “destroy” them in any way. For instance, people who desire to be in a bar on a Friday night drinking socially with friends I would consider to be less evolved than a person who can sit quietly with a book or just their thoughts for an entire weekend. When it is first desired to be in the company of others because one does not feel comfortable alone, I would say that people like that are the ones who are suffering from mental deficiency—and they require some evolution. However, our public schools all over the world are committed to nurturing that weakness in people, and the net result has been the failures we are seeing all over the world at this very moment. That is the story in both the Orlando shooting and the Jo Cox case. It’s not lone wolves that are the problem, it is a meddling political class of socialist loving progressives who have forced people next to each other to satisfy their ridiculous love of some Marxist John Lennon song, “Imagine.” By the way, I think “Imagine” is one of the crappiest songs ever recorded. I hated it when I was a kid before I even knew what it meant, and I despise it now. It is the song of the progressive left—Lennon’s wife did have a lesbian affair with Hillary Clinton which makes the thinking of those deranged people very relevant to today—because they are still injecting themselves into our lives four decades later.
And really that’s how all this ties together. When I was in grade school starting very early kids would ask what your favorite rock group was and if you didn’t have one, you were made to feel bad. I didn’t care at all for pop music during my grade school years. I was happiest spending time alone with my thoughts. Many counselors and teachers tried to twist the arms of my parents and make them feel terrible about my lack of social consideration. I never went to a school dance until I was a senior in high school and that was only to show everyone that I could bring one of the most attractive girls in Cincinnati—who was much better looking than any girl in my graduating class at the time. It was an act of rebellion, and once I did it, I didn’t have to do it again. I never even thought twice about it, until people put the social pressure on me to make me think there was something wrong with me. It wasn’t me, it was actually a mass psychosis induced by the masses going to the trough to listen to popular music like what John Lennon was making in his private studio with Phil Spector to launch the world into global socialism. And now that a majority of the world has followed those doomed lyrics, those idiots are looking for someone to blame, and the lone wolves are their most convenient target—because as long as they exist, the failure of their “Imagine” policies will be grossly obvious.
These violent events of recent, and all that follow are responsibilities of the political left and its salesmen–losers like John Lennon. They obtained their song and now people are rejecting it. In England, the people there want their country back from the European Union. In America, we are about to vote for Donald Trump—the ultimate individualist. John Lennon’s song has lost its appeal because the utopia he sang about has turned out to be a nightmare. People did “Imagine” through the pot infested smoke they inhaled, and what they saw scared them. And now they are turning away and the first people they see to follow are the lone wolves who have never been part of the group to begin with—people like me, Donald Trump, and many others. These killers are not like me; they are not lone wolves who think on their own. They require some doctrine to think for them—some institutional claim. They are not lone wolves.
A lone wolf is a higher form of evolutionary living. In the United States it is something to aspire to, even though many never get there. It takes a lot more courage to sit alone at home with a book and your thoughts than it does to sit in a bar with five friends on a Friday giving you peer review of your clothing, your jewelry, and your economic status. But for the political left, they can’t even think of such a thing because the goal of their existence is John Lennon’s stupid song—a path to nowhere and the hard truth that everything they ever believed in has failed our civilization. Take it from a lone wolf—it is obvious. That’s why they hate us.
What an idiot, yet she and her former husband are the leaders of the modern progressive movement. And they call that art……………………………….LOL
If you are in the market for a gun and want to learn how to use it, you should stop by and see the very good people who run the Premier Shooting and Training Center. It is a one stop shop for everything you need to get started and maintain an interest in guns. When times get tough like they are now, the safest things you can do is to not only buy a gun to defend your home and loved ones, but to vote with your wallet and let Washington D.C. know how you feel by spiking the sales which speaks louder than any lobbyist group could dream of for either pro or con stances on firearms. The shooting range at Premier is one of the best in the Tri-State area. It is a classy, clean place with a very professional staff. They are great people and represent the best of what America has to offer. If you are a seasoned shooter, you won’t be disappointed. But if you are new, they will make you feel at home. You can learn more at the following link:
The Overmanwarrior 