March 26th 2013 will forever go down in history as the day Atlas Shrugged Part III was announced with a green light for production making it the last film in the epic trilogy following the novel by Ayn Rand published in 1957. The novel since that time has been consistently ranked as one of the best-selling books in history behind only The Bible and is the unique product of American philosophy which is exceptional any place in the entire world.
The point of the entire book–which critics of the previous two films who are not fans of Ayn Rand do not understand—is to meet the long discussed John Galt, who is in essence the perfect man. Galt’s Gulch is the creation of the main protagonists which fans have not had a chance to see until this upcoming film. The producers promise to begin filming in the fall of 2013 on the East Coast so to save roughly 20% of the production cost imposed on them from the previous two films shot in California.
The Atlas films are not for everyone, so most of the movie going audience will not be sure what to think about the translation of the Ayn Rand epic to film. For those who enjoyed the recent History Channel presentation of The Bible, the approach to the Atlas films is very similar. At the end of Part III when watched from beginning to end in one large 6 hour presentation, the Atlas Shrugged films will be much more satisfying to the casual audience.
For the millions who enjoy the book, they will enjoy the movie. For those who find Ayn Rand’s novels life shattering, they will hate the movie. They will absolutely hate what John Galt represents when they meet him and they will do everything in their power to stop viewers from seeing the film when it hits theaters on July 4th 2014. The best explanation for why some people, particularly on the left hate Atlas Shrugged and its author Ayn Rand so much can be seen from that same Bible series on the History Channel. The reaction critics have toward Atlas Shrugged is the same that the Pharisees had toward Jesus Christ. The message of John Galt is dangerous to such people, and they despise John Aglialoro for putting into film a book that is considered to be a menace to society by politicians like Barack Obama and his gang of collectivists. For that reason, it is a small miracle that the production of Atlas Shrugged Part III is going to happen at all, and thank goodness it is. There are people in the world that are desperately hungry for its message, and now more people than ever will have access to a masterpiece which is uniquely a product of American philosophy. The reason America has been the greatest country on Earth is what Atlas Shrugged is all about, and the definitions are unquestionably uttered by the words of John Galt. In the summer of 2014, the world will learn just Who John Galt is. Many viewers will like it, and many more will hate it, but the philosophy will side with the minority as history will chronicle the victor. The truth is indisputable and is contained within the words that John Galt will utter in an epic masterpiece in the making, Atlas Shrugged Part III which is coming soon to a theater near you.
The mistakes that Catherine made during the exchange is the same that Governor Kasich is currently doing with Medicaid expansion in the state of Ohio, the federal government dangles money raised through taxes like a carrot in front of the greedy faces of people like Stoker and the temptation nearly 100% of the time is to grab it. Stoker and trustee president Lee Wong want the federal grant being argued about at the trustee meeting because it will free up money to be used in other places and provide relief to their budgets. For a politician creating a new bike path or a new bridge to nowhere is all too tempting as it provides them something to do, and an achievement for which to be re-elected on. Any time a politician can build something with other people’s money then take credit for the achievement it makes their résumé more attractive to re-election allowing continued access to the perks of elected office. The architects of Agenda 21 knew this a long time ago. They knew that Americans would never accept direct infiltration of socialist ideas, so they constructed their plan to exploit the weakness in America of poorly qualified politicians eagerly seeking federal money to prop up their careers instead of managing their finances.
The easiest way to understand this relationship is through any local public school system. Typically financially strapped school boards are always looking for new federal programs to help them hedge against the costs of their labor force which is always on the rise. School boards actively apply for Head Start, No Child Left Behind, and Common Core programs so that they can gain access to federal money in the same way that West Chester trustees seek a grant to construct a sidewalk. In schools which are run by progressive labor unions—the same kind of international forces committed to Agenda 21 strategies shape their policies as well. They openly push to exceed their payroll from the previous year not so that teachers can be well paid, but so school boards will always have a need for federal money to absorb the 3% to 7% labor increases incurred every fiscal year. When the labor unions at the national and international level push for more money in their membership they achieve two things, they gain “useful idiots” who are so well paid that they won’t question the source of the money and will fight in the trenches to always apply pressure on management causing them to act irrationally reaching for federal money. They then can achieve the real objective of superseding local management authority of curriculum decisions by imposing the will of The United Nations which comes with the federal money. This is the current danger with Common Core instruction. The federal money allows some pinhead in a faraway land to decide what goes on a school curriculum and the tendency of public unions to continuously be overpaid forcing elected management to the public coffers to accept handouts. To gain the money Agenda 21 type strategies must be accepted as the condition for taking the money.
Obviously Catherine Stoker did not appreciate George Lang even bringing up Agenda 21. In all reality she probably has no idea that it may have originated in some Geneva gentleman’s club constructed on paper over watered down whiskey and lap dances given to comb-over U.N. bureaucrats pretending they are ruling the world through legislation instead of the way their European ancestors did—by the point of a sword. Stoker like tens of thousands of politicians just like her all over The United States doesn’t want to know about Agenda 21. They want to simply take the money like a teenager who has just received their first credit card and begin charging all the things they want to buy to a federal credit limit to be paid later by somebody else long after they have built their personal legacies.
After seeing that video and the disgusting transactions that occurred, two West Chester citizens stepped forward to announce that they were going to run for trustee against Lee Wong and Cathy Stoker in the upcoming 2013 election. It was Mark Welch who stepped forward during the video to announce his candidacy. Obviously he had been teetering on the subject for some time, and like many, he is busy with his personal business and has better things to do. Usually it’s the vacant souls who run for office because they need elected office to fill their social identities with something useful. But this is how management of taxpayer resources becomes so distorted—which prompted Welch to act. Seeing Stoker so recklessly accept federal grant money for a stupid sidewalk was enough for him to commit to the cause. Another man after the camera was turned off and the meeting was dispersing announced his candidacy as well. Mathew King threw his hat into the ring with the intention to help bring fiscal sanity to West Chester by contributing real management to the Board of Trustees for a change. George Lang is a successful person in his private life so he does not seek office to prop himself up as many do—which is why he can see why taking federal money is a bad idea. But he is only one vote out of three, and the other trustees who are both up for re-election in 2013 do not share his values. The other two trustees are obviously using their office to fill a personal void in their lives that can only be filled with other people’s money—and this makes them dangerous necessitating a need for others like Lang to run for elected office.
“Do they not realize that this is war?” These are the kind of “pro-education” advocates that Ohio Education Association representative Becki Villamangna corresponds with on her Facebook account. Becki is the Communications/Political Action representative for the OEA and she has targeted my friend Kelly Kohls who is the school board president of Springboro for attack many times. Due to the success of that school district in driving down their labor costs without impacting the tax payers, Becki’s arm of the OEA has aggressively attacked Kohls with all the fury of any combat maneuver in war. CLICK HERE to read about one of Villamanga’s radical attempts to harass Kelly which I have covered here at the Overmanwarrior’s Wisdom before. The OEA is clearly frustrated that they have lost many of their battles in Southern Ohio, particularly at the Lakota, Mason, Springboro and West Clermont school districts. Kelly Kohls has become the focus of the massive Ohio public sector union because she has had the most success in doing what radical progressive educators fear most—management of their financial resources. However in Northern Ohio where there hasn’t been as much pushback against the unions as there has been in the south, schools around Cleveland are still using the extreme extortion tactics that the OEA are so famous for. (I say OEA because most teacher unions in the state of Ohio fall under the umbrella of the OEA.) To education professionals who are COMMITTED to progressive agenda items they are in education not for children, but because they are at WAR with the public who leans toward traditional values. Such Ohio Education Association tactics that have been attempted on a smaller scale against Kelly Kohls in Springboro are being done on a larger scale in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb as shown in the video below where teachers are on strike and retaliating against the substitute teachers the school has hired to keep the schools open for kids. Watch this!
The striking teachers feel so entitled to their jobs that they have been posting flyers to neighbors of those employees attempting to apply peer pressure by using the classic “SCAB” terminology against the replacement workers. The idea behind such a derogatory term is to use collectivism to impose a union will on individuals who simply want to make a living, so that labor leverage can be maintained by the striking employees. The OEA members who are striking are firmly committed to communism, and are caught in their belief of turning the capitalist society of America into a socialist state-run by the education elite. They of course don’t call their ideology “communism” by name, but their practice reveals their intentions.
I don’t ask you dear reader to take my word for these accusations. I simply ask you to look at the facts. For such proof, as the OEA is locked in their labor dispute in Cleveland trying to push replacement workers out of their jobs before the uselessness of their real teaching value is exposed as a fraud, Becki Villamagna was posting the below comments on her Facebook page during February of 2013. Becky had just returned from a training class with her members where she received some push back as she attempted to do on the microcosm what the OEA is attempting to do on the macrocosm of Cleveland. She openly complained about the resistance she was getting from her own members who found her Saul Alinsky strategies too “radical.” Becki knows what she is doing; she is attempting to apply peer pressure on her OEA members by letting them know about her disapproval seeking other like-minded opinions to build up a consensus against the dissidents. It’s a variation of The Delphi Technique done on a much smaller scale using Facebook as the Change Agent. Have a look at her exact dialogue and a couple of responses she obtained.
Recent Becki Villamagna Facebook posting
This morning I gave a training session on electing and working with school board members. Many of you will be shocked to hear that one participant didn’t like me because some of my suggestions were too subversive and were only “dirty tricks.” Share ·
February 4 at 12:55pm via mobile · 2 people like this.
Patty Ray do they not realize this is war? February 4 at 12:58pm
George Bozovich Some folks just don’t get it! February 4 at 1:05pm
Patty Ray’s response to Becki Villamagna’s posting says wonderfully what the OEA is all about and how education professionals truly think in their hearts. The OEA is at WAR with the rest of society which is why they are attacking replacement workers in Cleveland, and why they are attacking Kelly Kohls at virtually turn. They are at war with anyone who stands in the way of their social advancement of progressive causes and the proof is in the dialogue they use with each other when they think nobody else is looking. Of course you’ll find no newspapers that will cover this issue, because they are in on the deal.
Many, including teachers trained by Becki Villamagna are beginning to see that education is not about teaching kids with the OEA, but is about WAR. They are just now learning what I have known for many years now. That realization is the primary reason I named this site what I have…..Overmanwarrior’s Wisdom as opposed to something more conventional………more press friendly. We are at war with the OEA because they started that war against those of us who value traditional American principles, particularly in education. People like Becki Villamagna, Patty Ray and the nut cases harassing substitute employees in a Cleveland suburb are villains in that war to those of us who want to see goodness being taught to children, and social stability advocated by education institutions. It is a war by their own declaration, and actions. I have watched their behavior for many years and decided that if they wanted war, then they’d get war. They would be beaten intellectually, they would be beaten with radicalism—if need be, and if they wanted to get violent, they would receive it back twice for what they issued. I prefer the intellectual debate, but when they run out of emotional bullet points and they attempt to attack personal character and toy with violence as their method of coercion they have received it back in return.
Wars are not won with kind words and placation. The OEA members are some of the worst people I have ever had to deal with as to radical social behavior. They have the destruction of America in their minds and they are terrible people because their ideology makes them corrosive. They openly use children to execute their maniacal plans for social progressive changes at the expense of society, and this defines their essence. Wars are won by taking away from the other side the will to continue fighting. This is what the OEA does to people like Kelly Kohls and the poor substitute teachers in Cleveland. The OEA attacks them directly hoping to rob them of their will to stand opposed to the union’s progressive agenda. This is why Patty Ray said on Becki’s Facebook, “Don’t they realize this is war?” She says it because to the OEA radicals they are at war with the taxpayers. The answer to Patty is that some do know it, I know it, Kelly knows it and thousand upon thousands of other tax payers know it now, and we are willing to engage. The effects are already evident within Becki’s own organization. The teachers in her union are beginning to question her methods and are fighting back against her kind with polite resistance, as Villamagna complained about on her Facebook page. This dissension in their ranks will only widen over the coming years, and the strength of their movement will be shattered eventually.
I knew this would be the ultimate ending for the OEA union when they first came after me in the fall of 2010. My critics might call my anger and behavior the results of “thin skin” because they expected me to take their personal attacks with the maturity of a “civilized” “white man,” as defined by progressive strategists and their view of the typical conservative American. The hero of the OEA–Saul Alinsky described his plans in 1972 to begin to organize the white middle class across America. The necessity of that project became his book Rules for Radicals which Vicki and the OEA unions certainly gobbled up nearly word for word in their activist practices. Alinsky believed that what PresidentRichard Nixon and Vice-PresidentSpiro Agnew called “The Silent Majority” was living in frustration and despair, worried about their future, and were ripe for a turn to radical social change. Alinsky desired to create social mechanisms to entice The Silent Majority into becoming politically active citizens. Even if Vicki Villamagna does not have Rules for Radicals on her book shelf, she has been taught the concepts instructed in that book under different names by her labor union—who widely adopted Alisnky as their prophet for radical change in America. This is what progressive labor unions have done in our public schools, and what their part in the “WAR” is all about. Saul Alinsky feared that the middle class could be driven to a right-wing viewpoint if progressives failed in their task, “making them ripe for the plucking by some guy on horseback promising a return to the vanished verities of yesterday.” So thus, my strategy is now clear and its effects are beginning to be seen as the secret is no longer strategically necessary. I have read Rules for Radicals and studied Alinsky, so I know what Villamagna is up to when she protests my friend Kelly Kohls. I know how to beat those enemies of traditional America. They will be beaten because they were the ones who declared war against traditional America and deserve what is coming.
There is nothing that beats a progressive villain better than giving people the freedom of choice. Progressives HATE choice just like the socialist/communist hates capitalism. Choice destroys their order of tyranny. By supporting Workplace Freedom you allow the teachers who told Becki Villamagna her tactics were too subversive and were only “dirty tricks, the chance to leave Becki’s organization completely which will cut off the money that supports the WAR on the progressive side. This is how we can beat the evils of progressive advancement—simply by taking away the money they use to attack us. In the meantime, I will continue to be that guy on horseback promising a return to the vanished verities of yesterday. I will do it because I believe it. But I will also do it because it is the surest way to destroy the attack of the progressives into the roots of America from which they seek complete destruction. And I will enjoy every, single minute of it. Justice one way or another will be obtained—it will prevail as sure as these words are written. Yes we are at war and to answer the question of Patty Ray we do know it, and we are coming to claim the victory and enjoy the spoils of war—that was launched against us under a banner of peace.
I participate in this war because I want to be that guy on horseback promising a return to the vanished verities of yesterday and I don’t take a dime from anybody to do it. I do it because it’s the right thing to do.
Republicans are terrified of the Tea Party position because they don’t want to lose having a Republican as governor. For them, they win if they retain their elected seats. Ideologically, almost all politicians think the same way. They are universally devoid of principles and only want to do what they have to in order to keep their offices. They will lie, cheat and steal to retain their seats, so Republicans pull together as a collective to defeat Democrats so that in mass they can keep their elected offices. At the end of the day Kasich is absolutely no different from Barack Obama because both will do whatever they have to in order to win re-election. They function from a lack of personal conviction. In Kasich’s case, he is the leader of the Republican Party in Ohio by default, so as a collective unit, other Republican Senators and Representatives get in line behind Kasich’s strategy, and for the most part everyone sticks to the same story. For the Tea Party, who simply wants fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets, if the Republicans aren’t giving them those things, then the politicians have failed to do what they were elected to do.
Many of those politicians will call people like Matt and Chris “extremists” and radical “right-wingers.” They will do everything they can to discredit the efforts of any Tea Party patriots so that the greatest threat to their parasitic existences can be eliminated. Matt Mayer is President of Provisum Strategies where he provides strategic and tactical political policy advice to public and private-sector clients. Mayer also serves as a Visiting Fellow with The Heritage Foundation, America’s top think tank, where he writes and speaks on national security issues. He is also a Research Fellow at the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs. Mayer’s first book, Homeland Security and Federalism: Protecting America from Outside the Beltway argued for reversing the federalization of homeland security by returning power to the states and localities. I could go on and on about Matt Mayer, in fact his “about the author” section of his book goes on for two pages of experience at both the federal and state level positions. He is the recipient of the ABA-BNA Excellence in Labor & Employment Law Award and has given testimony to the U.S. Congress, Texas House and Senate, the Ohio House and Senate, appeared on Fox News, C-Span and on and on. When it comes to politics, Matt is a genius and his friend Chris Littleton seen in the next video is equal in many ways. The information that Chris will provide below is stunning, and one of the best kept secrets in politics.
For most political insiders and industry brick builders, their first thoughts about people like Matt or Chris is that if they are so brilliant—such extraordinary minds–then why aren’t they running the Republican Party instead of Karl Rove. Why are they wasting their time giving free speeches and traveling all over the state and country without any prospect of “profit?” As Matt finished his speech above and Chris began I watched Mayer leave. After giving me a wave goodbye he stepped out into the cold March evening and started up an average looking weathered car to drive off to his next speech. At the end of the day he’d drive back to his home in Dublin, Ohio putting hundreds of additional miles on his car promoting a book that he is donating 100% of the proceeds to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library. Chris could tell almost the same type of story. I have spent many evenings speaking with Chris and can attest to his sincerity. Chris or Matt could make millions of dollars exploiting the system the way Kasich is doing currently along with hundreds of other state Reps, Senators, and their ornamental lapdogs—but they don’t. Both men know so much about politics that they could be rich beyond measure if they chose to, but instead they speak at events like the West Chester Tea Party and write books for free, because they simply want to educate society. They do what they do because they are good people who care with all their heart and souls about the world around them.
Kasich in the quiet of his office when all the other politicians have left his ear would probably wish he could be either Matt Mayer or Chris Littleton. It takes a strong man to have the knowledge to crush enemies and exploit their toil for all the gold one can carry away in their pockets, yet avoid doing so. Most politicians exploit every opportunity to their advantage. But to walk away from the temptations of exploitive wealth and do what’s right is reserved for only the best men. The reason people like Matt and Chris are so outraged at Governor Kasich isn’t because they think ill will of him. They are outraged because they have not sold their souls to political life and still have their ideas intact. They have not compromised their beliefs in favor of a political career as Kasich has, so they earned the ability to be critical of those who have. The Tea Party they speak to, and through with books like Taxpayers Don’t Stand A Chance also have the right to be critical of John Kasich and his Republican stooges. Republicans along with Democrats have lied, stolen, and manipulated to keep their offices, so it goes without saying that the punishment for them should be to lose those offices even if it costs Ohio the loss of Republican seats. Those Republican seats are worthless if the politicians who sit in them behave like progressives, or standard Democrats. It is not the obligation of Ohioans to turn their gazes the other way while John Kasich earns his chance to run for President of The United States by delivering to Ohio an entitlement expansion of Medicaid that will crush the state economically 10 years into the future. The responsible thing to do is to identify the behavior as a failure even if it is painful, because the right thing to do is often not easy, or free of pain.
During the late fall of 2011 into the winter of 2012 WLW radio was speaking to me about becoming their on-air “education correspondent” for all topics that involved public education. The role would be similar to how they currently use Mike Allen for legal issues or Nathan Bachrach on financial discussions. While I was honored they showed such an interest in me deep down inside my feelings about public education had deteriorated considerably from my experiences. I went from thinking that education was just out-of-control financially—to something that was socially dangerous for American culture. I did not think I could provide neutral commentary on the topic during radio programs. I had developed a hatred for public education that only solidified as the first months of 2012 emerged culminating with a meeting by the Lakota School Board which I chronicled in an article titled, “The Day Lakota Died.” I had learned in my dealings with education professionals over a 5-6 year period that wisdom was not the objective of public schools. They were simply indoctrination centers driven by government for the sinister purpose of advocating social collectivism. When Lakota Superintendent Mantia uttered during the last levy campaign that the money was needed to carry children into a 21st century “global” economy she was revealing the same strategy discussed recently by David Barton on The Glenn Beck Program seen in the video below. Public education as it was discovered by Barton in Texas, and copied by virtually every public school that takes federal money, is fulfilling a far left agenda driven by government bureaucrats for the aim of government expansion under a socialist ideology that has been decades in the making. What public schools were essentially doing in the modern era was the same type of thing that was done under Lenin in Petrograd during the 1920s, and I was not happy about it. The Soviet takeover of public education was chronicled by Ayn Rand in her near autobiography titled We The Living, so the strategies happening at Lakota were not unique to our modern age. They have happened before, so the signs are now easy to see. I had to change my position on public education from just a tax reformer to someone who could speak against the practice. Being a correspondent on WLW radio would only pull me in deeper to the education tyranny, when the opposite direction was what I needed to pursue.
What David Barton revealed in that video should alarm every single parent with a child who is school age. It should alarm every tax payer because it is property taxes from virtually every American that funds this terrible evil. What Barton discussed is not isolated to public schools in Texas, New York or some far-away land like California, but it is present in hometown U.S.A. in schools like Lakota. The evidence is in comments like Mantia’s “global education.” It has been the strategy of radical education professionals for years to steer society in a far left-winged direction, and they have been using our schools to do it. It is clear now upon looking at the last couple of generations of youth coming out of these schools what the attack against America has been. The evidence is obvious, young people have been taught to be progressive, to vote for people like Barack Obama, to support entitlement programs, abortion, and revisionist history, and it is destroying our country by changing the electorate and their voting priorities.
I have said the same kind of things that David Barton reported for more than three decades now. While my own kids were going to public school I was always at odds with what they were learning and I sometimes spent entire Saturday afternoons speaking to them and their friends teaching real history instead of the revisionist crap they were learning in school. In the back of my mind I was hoping that I was wrong, but I knew I wasn’t. Instead, the situation was far, far worse than I was even willing to admit.
Combined with the Lakota Superintendent’s articles here in the Journal, the “Community Conversations” program, along with a few pro Levy speeches, and I can’t help but feel that I’m watching a football game where the home team is losing 45 to 0 yet the cheerleaders are still on the sideline with their pom poms in hand completely oblivious to the events happening on the field of play still reciting the “cheers” they learned in practice.
Much to their dismay, the “Levy Addicts” who are pounding the drums for another tax increase this year and are attempting to soften the resistance with new strategies, the score up on the board is not in their favor. Lakota as a district is about to see an influx of income from the Liberty Way Development, the Carriage Hill Development, and the continued growth of the Union Center corridor. All the tax revenue coming in from these activities will be more than the previous year. Combine that trend with the 10 year projection of declining student enrollment due to the number of homes in Lakota without children increasing–balancing the budget without a tax increase should be easy.
The old mantra that education is for the “kids” is old and worn out. Nobody believes it any more just like nobody believes the home team is going to win when the score is so lopsided yet the cheerleaders are still on the sideline saying the same mindless drivel that they have the entire game. What the levy supporters want with tax increases is simply a glorified community babysitting service. What I have learned about public education these last couple of years does not lend credence to any kind of education quality even for so-called great schools like Lakota. For the 18,000 people who have turned down these levies over the years for multiple reasons, we have no choice but to support the product now, which is currently too expensive. It is simply unfathomable to ask for more, especially when the score is so lopsided—in spite of the mindless cheers.
The progressive left has been successful in labeling anyone critical of their strategies as “crazy,” so few challenge their aims. The situation at Lakota is that there is plenty of money coming into the school and they could avoid tax increases against the community due to the declining enrollment. But this upsets the “Levy Addicts” tremendously as they unconsciously are working to achieve the aims of The Naked Communist. I say unconsciously because I doubt Karen Mantia at Lakota and her minions of latte sippers have ever read that book, or know of the 45 strategic points articulated there. They simply want the federal money to pay for their progressive labor contracts, and they will do whatever the federal government tells them to do to get the money. This is why they are implementing Common Core practices and other Agenda 21 strategies without knowing anything specifically about those government programs. They are simply the non-thinking pawns that the radical progressive left uses to achieve their manipulative aims. So when dealing with my community at large I avoid using the world shattering language that is behind the truth, because most people just cannot accept that reality. They are not prepared to understand what David Barton is presenting.
David Barton is more correct than even he has been willing to admit. Public education is dangerous, and is the most corrosive element to modern America. The proof is all around us and is easy to see. The American family has been destroyed by public education, morality in America has been destroyed by public education, religion has been destroyed by public education, the economy has been destroyed by public education, political understanding has been destroyed by public education, the understanding of history has been destroyed by public education, individuality which is uniquely an American trait has been destroyed by public education and I could go on and on. Yet this isn’t the worst of it, there are ideas in federal education think tanks disguised behind good tidings to bring America far more dangers, which is the intent behind Common Core.
Knowing all these things, it would have been impossible for me to continue speaking on WLW the way I had been from 2010 to 2012. With each month that passed in my investigation the evidence added up to support the accusations shown above and it has caused me great outrage that I cannot contain. No American child should attend a public school as they are designed today. It’s not to say that I do not support education. Personally, I think young people and adults are severally lacking in their educations, but public education is NOT the way to get it. Public education is simply government propaganda and is treacherous. It needs to be spoken about as a public menace, instead of the savior that many wish it to be. If public education is allowed to continue brain washing children into a “global” marketplace the way that superintendents like Lakota’s Mantia wishes, it is at the expense of American sovereignty. Public education wants to destroy the values of young people so that students embrace larger government, and the evidence can clearly be seen in recent election results. The system has to be stopped and reborn. Competition must be injected and the government monopoly of education destroyed, so that children’s minds can be preserved—because public education is about destroying minds, not improving them. The fact is a grim reality, but is an unquestioned result of the propaganda driven progressives, and their fanatical desire to destroy traditional American values in favor of “global collectivism.”
One of the reasons that secular progressives have such a desire to remove religion from mankind’s mind and replace it with a belief in government is that they wish for the mistakes of the past to re-emerge among Earth’s societies in perpetuity. As politicians they want to be like King David and kill Goliath with a rock, only to steal the wife of his most honored advisors and believe that he can spit in the face of God while doing so. They wish to believe that they are like Samson, that they can fall in love with Philistine women and engage in reckless relationships so long as they don’t cut their hair and still have the strength to tear down the temple upon their enemies at will. Yet once in office they find that they are like the Biblical King Saul in that they don’t have the courage to be the whole package and seek instead to destroy their rivals who are closest to their heels in competition in order to maintain power for their family lineage. The stories of religion no matter what the faith are littered with failed men and women who sought to have dominion over others, and faltered to the doom of those serving under their leadership. Kingship is the great fantasy of almost every human being—to be walking Gods on Earth and to stand between mankind and the afterlife. Progressives seek to eliminate religion for the same reasons that Kings of old did, so that the people who they believe they lead will seek the King as the highest form of worship, not a mysterious God from some other existence. If the lessons of the past are erased, people are more prone to forgive the faults of those who currently want to be king and allow their rule to continue without analysis.
The biggest problem with Medicaid expansion, Obamacare, Social Security, and all the other big government entitlements is that like the kings and queens from the stories of religion the authors of the entitlements have kingship in the back of their minds when they sell the programs to the public for social benefit. This has never been so clear in the modern sense as what Mayor Bloomberg has attempted to do in the city of New York with his crusade against soft drinks. Bloomberg as a radical progressive wants to ban soft drinks within the city under the mantra that the health impact will cost the state millions in Medicare payments. The Mayor feels he has a valid point because it is true that soft drinks lead to diabetes and other diseases, and as the state of New York does have a financial stake in the health of its people due to entitlement programs that politicians work to keep funded, healthier New Yorkers are in the interest of everyone. Mayor Bloomberg wants to pat himself on the back at night like King Saul did many times in his audacious love of glory. Nobody wants to contemplate that New York should not have a stake in the lives of all New Yorkers though entitlement programs and the real secret behind the motivations of people like Bloomberg is that he wants to spread such programs to more people so that he can have more power in his city and state. The real desire is not to help people, it is to gain control over them.
When the Prophet Samuel struggled with the idea of anointing a King for Israel it was because of the tendency kings had in committing evil once they became drunk with power. Saul was no different. And the favorite servant of God, King David the harp player for Saul who waited in patience for many years to gain the crown also became seduced with that power when he sent the husband of the woman he most desired to his death under David’s command to hide the King’s adultery as she was carrying his child. Bloomberg who sees himself as King of New York has the same faults. He uses the mask of safety and concern for New Yorkers to hide his desire for power, and social redemption. He wants to believe that he is righteous, and that his people will thank him someday for his concern for their lives. For the same reasons that Saul sought to kill David, politicians like Bloomberg seek to destroy capitalism because it threatens their progressive encroachment on the lives of those they believe they rule over. Soft drinks are symbols of capitalism and the freedom to live unhealthy lives away from the kind of teachings that “good Kings” like Mayor Bloomberg or “Queens” like Michelle Obama wish to impose on their “subjects.” It is through entitlements that the progressive politician seeks to gain power over individual New Yorkers. Michelle Obama is already salivating that Obamacare will have the same ability on a national level—to tamper with the lives of all Americans—for their own good, as defined by the corrupt, power-hungry ruler.
Ohio’s John Kasich is probably one of the most religious governors currently in The United States, so he knows all these bible stories. Yet even so, he could not stop himself within two years of gaining the governor’s seat to ignore the Tea Party’s Health Care Freedom Amendment and expand Medicaid which would bring in dollars from Obamacare into Ohio and help him balance his budget under the flag of helping the poor, which he is now very concerned with since he wants four more years of Governorship in the 2014 election. You would think that Kasich would have learned in Sunday School the corruption of King Saul when he sent his troops out to kill David because his subjects loved the valiant warrior—and former harp player. Yet, Kasich is doing exactly what Saul did, he seeks to align himself with the corrupt and powerful so he can gain access to Obamacare money, and at the same time buy the votes of women and the working poor in Ohio so he can run for President in 2016. Saul wanted the crown to pass on to his son when he died, so he feared that David would destroy his family line. Kasich wishes to gain the Presidency for himself using entitlements to buy votes—and therefore gain control of all Ohioans by forcing them into Obamacare and all the rules, and costs that come with it.
Even the best politicians behave like King David, and his son Solomon. They all have well intended ideas, and believe they are doing social good through their rule. They all fantasize that they are Gods on Earth whether they admit it or not and are acting on behalf of the greater good. So it quickly becomes clear why secular progressives want to destroy all signs of religion from people’s minds. They wish to conceal the lessons learned from Bible studies and religious metaphors the world over so that the kings and queens of politics can have their chance like gamblers at a slot machine to hit the jackpot and become Gods on Earth for the first time in history. If there is any truth to the world domination theories that come out of the Bilderberg meetings and other elitist encroachments on personal liberty it is this “God-rule” desire that is at work, the right and will of some to rule over others for a kingdom in the making with high-minded aims at eternal salvation. It’s been done before in history and will be attempted again and again so long as mankind is on Earth or anyplace else.
All collective based policies have these root causes draped behind well-intended consequences. All government expansion leads to people like Mayor Bloomberg wishing to control the population through gun legislation forcing people to “get along,” or soft drink bans forcing them to “stay healthy.” People who desire to dish out “social justice” by the kings of politics think they are doing God’s work when they expand government for the good of all as they define “good.” But what they fail 100% of the time to do is prevent the faults of their limited thinking from corrupting their intentions with fallacies plagued with deficiency. Mayor Bloomberg may be rich, but that doesn’t’ make him “good.” He seeks to add “goodness” to his résumé which he will present at death’s door upon admittance by forcing New Yorkers to do “good” under his rule. In this way Bloomberg like the many kings from the Bible wish to believe that they are doing God’s work. But in reality they are only tyrants, and corrupted whores who lack understanding that it is freedom which is the highest moral premise and is the guiding light behind all spirituality. Knowing some of these people up close and personal over the years they all come to realize that they may have entered politics with the ambition of King Solomon but they leave it under the pretense of the whore in Jericho who helped reveal the temperament of the city to the attacking Israelites. At the end of their life politicians like Bloomberg and Kasich will simply hang a little ribbon on their doorways and hope that the afterlife is kind to them in forcing the people they ruled to cut down on their soft drinks or help the poor through wealth redistribution through Medicaid, which hopefully will pass them into the gates of heaven. But they will be horrified to learn that they should have listened to the Founding Fathers in America all along—which is why Thomas Jefferson created his own Bible of only passages from Jesus Christ—because the Bible lessons intend to teach that power corrupts and that the truly strong walk away, and do not fall in love with their political offices. What is truly good is when people act on their own volition and do good not because they want a more powerful office, or wish for dancing-girls to perform at their feet—but because they are truly good, and spiritually correct in embracing the freedom to live and think by learning from the lessons of history for an improved tomorrow without corrupt leaders and would-be social slavers. The secular progressive wishes to not only hide these messages from the people they wish to rule, but from their own eyes, because to know and understand history is to have the inconvenient burden of correcting the behavior. For Mayor Bloomberg it is far easier to just ban soft drinks.
This little story is for the politically left leaning supporter who believes that government brings fairness to the world by taking from those who have and giving to those who don’t, and that security is provided under an umbrella of policing authority. Every single day of my life I am engaged in a science experiment that has technical and behavior science ramifications which involves the motorcycle seen in the picture above. I seldom ever part from that motorcycle as it goes virtually everywhere I do every single day of a calendar year. I ride that motorcycle in the worst rainstorms, heaviest winds and even in the snow and ice. One time this past year of 2013 it snowed so badly while I was out and about that I couldn’t even turn my front wheel to change direction from one road to the next. I was regulated to only traveling in a straight line and then could not stop because the roads were so slick. Needless to say I did not crash. Part of my experiment is to see how much the human body can take in endurance while still performing at a high level. The nature of riding motorcycles means that there is no room for mistakes, so they cannot be made. By riding my motorcycle all year I get to break all kinds of perceived rules that society believes they must function under, and it gives me fresh perspectives that are useful elsewhere.
Most days riding that motorcycle is uneventful. But over the course of 365 days a year there are always 5 to 6 days where something potentially devastating happens. One such thing that wasn’t dangerous so much as it was technical was that I had a battery that was failing. After so many starts through a hard winter it wasn’t holding a charge, and when temperatures dropped to under 30 degrees, I was having a hard time getting it started. Well, one day toward the end of February I had barely managed to get the bike started at its destination for the return trip home and my fuel was extremely low. I was worried that if I got gas on the way home, that I wouldn’t get the bike started again because it didn’t have enough amps to crank the engine over. So I urged the bike to get as close to my home as possible. With luck I’d get to the gas station that was about a quarter-mile from my home—but I had serious doubts.
The big bike did run out of gas about a half mile from that sought after fueling station so I put it in neutral to coast the rest of the distance. My bike stopped rolling at the entrance to the gas station and I was able to push with my feet the motorcycle into the parking lot and up to the pump without too much extra trouble. I filled up my tank, but as I suspected the bike wouldn’t crank over more than a couple of times, not enough to start in the cold weather. The battery had not charged enough on the way home because I kept my RPMs down to save the gas. So I was a quarter-mile away from home but couldn’t start my bike. I didn’t want to call my wife because she was watching our grandchild for one of my daughters and I didn’t wish to bother her. So I started pushing the motorcycle that weighs about 800 pounds up the busy roadway toward my home.
There is a slight hill that I had to go up and along the way twice two motorists stopped to help me. Both men were summertime bikers and wanted to help a fellow motorcyclist. They offered me a ride or gas without any pretension of inconvenience. I asked them if they had jumper cables as my bike has a computer and cannot be kick started, or push-started in the usual way. It has to be started off the battery. Neither man had jumper cables with them so they wouldn’t be able to help. The second guy who stopped was a die-hard Harley Rider with a long beard that hung down over his stomach. He had a very nice warm truck that I could feel the heat coming out of as he spoke to me. It was very tempting to get into his passenger’s seat and have him take me home. Yet I didn’t want to leave my bike on the side of a busy road, even though my home was very nearby. Instead I waved the help along and thanked them for their concern. I decided to push my big bike the rest of the way home, which is what I proceeded to do in small intervals up the hill. It took me an additional 45 minutes, but eventually I was in my driveway and safe in my garage where I could make the necessary repairs and get the bike ready for the next day’s travel.
The guys who stopped to help me were not told by government to assist. They did it out of mutual respect. Being bikers themselves, they wanted to help a fellow motorcyclist. They didn’t know me from anybody else, they only saw that I was pushing my motorcycle up a hill and they wanted to help—because as both men said—“I’ve been there a time or two myself.” But I did not accept their help because I did not want to abandon my motorcycle in favor of comfort. So I struggled to push the bike up the hill in the freezing cold because if I hadn’t I would have wished later that I had toughed it out. Both bikers looked at me a bit odd when I reported to them that I’d push the bike the rest of the way home, but neither found the information alien.
It never even occurred to me to call the police, or Triple AAA or any organization for help with my predicament. I ride the motorcycle every day to solve problems like that from time to time. People under their own volition wished to help me, and I didn’t need government to get home. I picked as I always do, the most “self-reliant” option there was, and because I challenged the bike to get close to my house before running out of gas I gave myself the option of pushing it home if all systems failed—which they did.
In the absence of government Americans naturally want to help each other. Charity comes from respect and occurs because people want to do good things. The bikers who wanted to help me didn’t do it out of fear of being struck down by God if they drove on by, and they didn’t do it because they were paid by the tax payer to help stranded motorists. They did it because they too were bikers and they respected another biker to the level that they wanted to help if they could out of their own free-will, no government involvement at all. The same happens wherever government is not–even to this day. The good is easy to see in people where government has not stepped in to be the un-necessary mediator of disputes—which I get to see a few times a year because of my tendency to ride motorcycles beyond the safety net of normal society. All government systems could fail, as they do during emergencies, and people help each other without being told to out of sheer respect for their fellow human beings. Such behavior is not driven from fearful submission to authority, or altruistic compassion, but out of a sincere desire to help a fellow-man in their plight to do their daily activities. In the case of the bikers they are acting on self-interest ultimately. They hope that I or somebody else will do the same if they get into trouble, so they offer up the help so the network is nonverbally maintained.
In life if all government was shut down, and all tax payer funded activities were removed, my journey home that day would have been the same. The gas station would have still had gas when I needed it because it’s to their financial incentive to have what I need when I need it. And those two guys would have still stopped. But because of my tendency toward self-reliance I didn’t need their help, although it was appreciated. As for the roads and my use of them, I paid an enormous amount of state tax at the pump when I bought my gas which more than paid for my use of the pavement that day. I got my bike home and fixed without the intrusion of any government representative even in the form of a police officer. That is a trend that will continue. It is because of such realizations that I have less and less respect for those who vote in large government programs to provide a “safety net” for their lives. I avoid such safety like a man on fire seeks water. I stay as far away from them as possible, which is the primary reason I ride a motorcycle every single day of the year no matter what the weather. It is good to know these kinds of things, and most of the time they can only be seen by doing what nobody else is willing to do. It rests in my mind the argument that government could be greatly reduced and America would actually improve instead of decline, because the will to do good is still in people like the two guys who stopped to help me in a quarter-mile stretch of road. Such good people are still out there, but we just don’t see them because government stands in the way of us discovering such facts about each other. Government wishes to maintain the myth that they are needed, when in fact they are simply in the way.
And by the way, if the goof balls in The United Nations ever think they can get control of the people shown in the videos above, they are on “crack.” Most of those people are just now becoming aware of the problems I write about here everyday. And when they realize they have been scammed……………….they are going to be VERY, pissed off.
Common Core on the surface is supported by Bill Gates and his wife as part of their retirement philanthropy. I believe they genuinely desire to help children and are not directly part of a sinister plot created by The Department of Education in the early 1980s. Their involvement is indirect and is driven by “attributable charity.” Gates as often happens is highly sought after for his money, and it is in charity events and political schmoozing where the ideas generated to shape Common Core education practices in America were given to him over dinner parties and wine glasses. The desire to do good in the world for one of its richest men is a tempting prospect. This is how good people are recruited to do bad things which is explained in the two-hour lecture by Dr. Philip Zimbardo, author of The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil.
Common Core unlike Adolf Hitler’s book burning rituals in the 1930s where a central dictator seeking dominion over the minds of his subjects to keep them from being intelligent enough to challenge their authority, is designed to destroy children’s minds in a slow regression. It is not designed to advance any society. Unlike the dictators of the past, the villain is not a central figure like Barack Obama, or Fidel Castro, but the idea of collectivism itself which manifests in a collective evil that his hard to comprehend. Common Core is designed to do precisely over a long period of time what the Soviet Union tried to do in the Great Purge of the 1920s. Common Core seeks to reduce individual ambition, intelligence, and self-reliance into collective identification. It is because of Common Core and the products of education so far that have caused me to no longer support public schools and encourage people with small children to home school as the only safe option. However, even homeschooling won’t protect your family from Common Core as it is set to become a state requirement for the entire United States. Homeschooled children will at least have the opportunity to learn traditional education methods alongside Common Core if the worst case scenario occurs—where all 50 states are forced into the federal program through The Department of Education. Now, before I get into greater detail about Common Core and The Lucifer Effect, more needs to be known about Charlotte Iserbyt which can be seen as follows from Wikipedia. The reference notes are active and can be traced back to their sources for ease of research. I am aware that much of this will sound far-fetched, but it is quite real, and can only be seen clearly by pulling far away from the mountain so that vision can take in the collective whole.
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt is an American freelance writer and whistleblower who served as a Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education during the first term of U.S. President Ronald Reagan, and staff employee of the US State Department (South Africa, Belgium, South Korea).[1][2][3] She was born in 1930[4] and attended Dana Hall preparatory school and Katharine Gibbs College in New York City, where she studied business.[4] Iserbyt’s father and grandfather were Yale University graduates and members of the Skull and Bones secret society.
She is known for writing the book The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. The book claims that changes gradually brought into the American public education system attempt to eliminate the influences of a child’s parents (religion, morals, national patriotism), and mold the child into a member of the proletariat in preparation for a socialist-collectivist world of the future.[3] She alleges that these changes originated from plans formulated primarily by the Andrew Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Education and Rockefeller General Education Board, and details what she says are the psychological methods used to implement and effect the changes.[3]It should be known at this time that Andrew Carnegie and John Rockefeller were both competitors in business against each other and committed many sins which they sought to reconcile through philanthropy, especially in Carnegie’s case. They shared with the modern-day Bill Gates the classic struggle of proving to the proletariat of the world defined by Karl Marx in such a way, that they are not greedy bourgeoisie—which provokes them into “situational forces” that inspire their “attributable charity.” Again, refer to The Lucifer Effect at the end of this article for much greater detail. Reading these claims made by her keep an open mind and take note of the world around us right now. A few years ago, she may have seemed crazy, but more and more, she appears to be 100% correct in everything she has said.
In an interview[2] concerning secret societies and the elite agenda she disclosed that in the early 1980s she had a chance to meet with Norman Dodd who had been the chief investigator for the United States House Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations commonly known as the B. Carroll Reece Committee. In the video interview she claims that Dodd discussed a ‘network’ of individuals including Carnegie who planned to bring about world peace by means of rapid changes in society. These changes would be brought about by involving the populace in various wars and military conflicts. She further claimed that Dodd had discussions with Rowan Gaither, the president of the Ford Foundation in which he revealed that directives from the President of the United States compelled foundations related to the Ford Foundation to direct their funding into bringing about the merger of the USA with the Soviet Union.[5][unreliable source?][6][unreliable source?][7][unreliable source?]
Filmed interviews of Iserbyt have her detail her story that lead her from school board trustee/administrator to becoming a Ronald Reagan administration staff in the U.S. Department of Education, and discovering further to her complete disbelief how these policies of a socialist-collectivist nature originated all the way to President Reagan, Vice President George H. W. Bush, and their policy advisers.
Not listening to warnings provided to her in a book about Ronald Reagan (as California Governor, written by United Republicans of California (UROC)) given to her by a friend, Iserbyt dismissed the seemingly outrageous claims made in the book a short time prior to her accepting and leaving for the government position. In 1982 Reagan relieved her of her duties after leaking an important technology grant for computerized learning—Project BEST: “Better Education Skills through Technology”[10] brought about by the scholarly writings and a large study by an education specialist named Dr. John I. Goodlad at the Center for Educational Renewal at the University of Washington originally from British Columbia, Canada.[11] One book Iserbyt was critical of was “Schooling for a Global Age” edited by Charlotte C. Anderson, James M. Becker, Institute for Development of Educational Activities, New York 1979, that Iserbyt cited as having less to do with fostering learning and mainly to do with psychological manipulation of students possibly against the teaching of the child’s parents, for example, in arts classes.[12]
Through her father Charlotte Iserbyt was able to gain possession of the complete listings of the members, living and dead, of the Yale University Skull and Bones secret society, fashioned into a three-volume set: living members, deceased members, and complete listing of both[citation needed]. She cooperated in the writing of Dr. Antony C. Sutton’s book America’s Secret Establishment – The Order of Skull & Bones by providing the list of members obtained from her father.[14]
Fifteen Yale juniors are invited to join the Skulls each year in a process called “tapping.” A couple of thousand Yale graduates have been Skulls—WASP males from wealthy Northeastern families: Bush, Bundy, Cheney, Dodge, Ford, Goodyear, Harriman, Heinz, Kellogg, Phelps, Pillsbury, Rockefeller, Taft, Vanderbilt, Weyerhaeuser and Whitney were among its membership.
Iserbyt believes that the Bavarian Illuminati hid inside the Freemasons, and that the Skull and Bones Secret Society is derived from these Illuminati-degree Freemasons from Bavaria whose goals were documented in an original edition 1798 book Proofs of Conspiracy by John Robison in Iserbyt’s possession that she claimed was originally owned by the first president of the United States of America, Freemason, George Washington. The ideas of a ruling elite date back prior to Plato’s writings about the hierarchical plutocracy. Among the goals of the Order of the Illuminati were to destroy religions, and governments from within, merge the destroyed countries, and to bring about a one world government, a new world order, in their secret control.[15][16]
In the secret societies interview she states that virtually all of the Carnegie Foundation agreements with the Russian education system were still in place, as well as the U.S. Department of Education programs that Iserbyt claims brought about the downfall of American prosperity since the turn of the century, especially post World War II.[citation needed]
The reason Charlotte was able to walk away from her job and blow the whistle on this plot is because she had the rare ability to resist The Lucifer Effect. Few people have the ability to resist The Lucifer Effect even those like Bill Gates who believe that their actions are for the greater good. The way that people like Bill Gates get pulled into such schemes is through “attributable charity.” It is in the belief that through peer “behavior compliance” in the work of philanthropy that good work can be done by investing many millions of dollars into programs that no tax payer would fund through elected offices. The evil at work is not a single person, but the adherence to a system of belief that passes from one generation to another through “situational forces.” All those terms will be explained in greater detail in the video lecture below by Dr. Zimbardo.
Without a doubt, for the casual reader running across this information for the first or even second time, these facts are inconvenient. They force the mind to accept things that it has long regulated as conspiracy crack-pot theories. However, the villain is in the collectivism which is shared across all spheres of influence mentioned in this article—no matter if it is the Bavarian Illuminati, the National Advisory Council of the American Veterans Committee, or the crazy radical Bill Ayers–they all share in common the seduction of their individual essences to The Lucifer Effect. The Common Core that all public schools are implementing so that they can obtain federal money for their shrinking budgets is driven by “behavior compliance,” provoked by labor unions into focusing “situational forces” to the door step of Bill Gates so he’ll throw money at Common Core and advance the program through “attributable charity” by-passing the politics of the American republic to fulfill strategic goals designed in 1979 as reported by the whistleblower Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt.
The Cincinnati Tea Party took the hard stand of protesting Governor Kasich’s open acceptance of Obamacare by expanding Medicaid with heavy hearts, but wild ambition. Many traditional political pundits and strategists are not sure what to make of such an aggressive stand against what many thought was a Tea Party Governor. It was the Tea Party that put Kasich over the top of Ted Strickland in 2010 yet within just two years Kasich has shown a desire to take yet more government handouts from the federal government which erodes away state sovereignty under the 10th Amendment, and openly ignores the Healthcare Freedom Amendment that was passed in Ohio protecting all state residents from Obamacare. Republicans who many believe are behind the Tea Party movement are rather baffled to see Tea Party members treating them with the same aggressive vigor as they have progressive Democratic candidates. Yet when the Tea Party says it demands fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government, they mean it no matter who the perpetrator is or what political affiliation is next to their name.
To understand why and how the game is played between the federal government and state governments view this video done by members of The Cincinnati Tea Party. The basic essence behind Kasich’s expansion of Medicaid can be explained in the video.
Below is the link to the article from The Cincinnati Tea Party website where pictures of the event can be seen.
In a video from Channel 5 seen at one of the links below the camera ended on the face of Bill Cunningham of 700 WLW who at one time considered himself a “libertarian,” even a “conservative,” but nearly single-handedly undermined his friend John Kasich in the famous Senate Bill 5 election. Cunningham learned then what Kasich is learning now, that they are both the kinds of politicians and media personalities who have taken the country to the brink of fiscal collapse. It is people like them who give Obama power, and federal influence over a state like Ohio. When Cunningham said on the day after this rally on his radio show, “who wouldn’t take federal money if it helped to balance the budget.” Well the answer is, Tea Party supporters wouldn’t, which is why they were protesting outside when the real culprits were inside patting themselves on the back. If Kasich wants to be “compassionate” then let him give all his money to the poor, but don’t demand that everybody else has to throw some of their money in the pot of Ohio. That is no different from what Obama does—and they are both wrong.
Under the new definitions of politics that The Cincinnati Tea Party is beginning to define it is not “compassionate” to steal other people’s money to redistribute to others, which is what Medicaid does and what the expansion of it will achieve. John Kasich is not a “compassionate conservative” because he’s reaching out to the poor, and downtrodden. It simply makes him a thief who sought a way to circumnavigate the Health Care Freedom Amendment with the expansion of a giant federal program with socialist tendencies in Medicaid. The Tea Party does not exist to run for office or control a political party. It exists for one reason, to maintain fiscal responsibility, demand limited government, and maintain free markets in America. Everything else is the workings of politicians who wish to make their marks on history by stealing from others so that they can buy votes with other people’s effort. As can be seen easily, the John Kasich seen at the video below and the Kasich seen at any of the links following the video are different people. Go ahead…………look for yourself.
And a side note to Ann………………I’m proud of you! Nice job!
One of our members has drafted a truly great letter to our local rep. Please read it and if so moved, copy and tweak it for your use. We truly have a modern-day Thomas Paine in our midst.
Dear Brad,
As I began to react to my immense disappointment in the absence of your commitment to Rep. Bridenstine’s effort to defund Obamacare, it struck me how intrusive this legislation has been in my life and everyone copied above. For the last four years, life has revolved around this monster. I made four trips to DC and was in the Capital when it passed. Three weeks later, I found myself in UC’s Neuroscience ICU following my husband’s brain injury declining trauma research participation for fear the data could compromise his level of care. My fellow Ohioans spent thousands of hours and dollars to pass the Healthcare Freedom Amendment by 66%. The 2nd District liberty grassroots committed to your candidacy to replace Jean Schmidt due to her willfully serving as a puppet for the RINOs in leadership and failing to represent us on this issue. Now we must spend more hours of our family time beating back the tentacle of Medicaid expansion due to the unprincipled action of Governor Kasich and I’m spending inordinate amounts of time tending to the enormous regulations put upon small businesses along with the 40% premium increase. All the while, the power to stop this has existed in the House, the GOP Majority House, since January 2011. This could have ended long ago if John Boehner would have led the 2010 grassroots elected members in that direction instead of capitulating to Obama and playing politics. His continued denial of our existence speaks volumns of his lack of character.
Rep Bridenstine summed it up best when asked about the effort,”if you’re going to make an offer, you better be prepared to walk away from the table”. I couldn’t agree more. This nonsense about the destruction to the GOP if they are blamed for a government shutdown is a joke. Newsflash, the bomb has detonated. If any republican wants to survive the fallout, they better be ready to take the bold, conservative stance to defund Obamacare. The excuse that it won’t pass the Senate is just that, an excuse. Do the work of the House of Appropriations, period. Essential services continue under a shutdown. Most of us remember the shutdowns under Reagan and Clinton, and more importantly we remember that our lives and families never felt threatened. How is it that now we feel threatened when the federal government is operating as usual? It would be funny if it weren’t so heartbreaking. I find myself making every financial, actually every decision considering the reach and hand of government. The reality is we are well down the road to serfdom. We don’t even think like free people anymore.
Please remember you are a Representative of the 2nd District and only the 2nd District. We will not accept rationalization for any funding for Obamacare appropriated in the next CR or any other master plan of the abysmal GOP leadership and their henchmen. We have explicitly expressed that defunding Obamacare is THE top priority. Obamacare is destroying businesses, families and lives. My support will be dependent upon this most basic of requests. The man in cardiac arrest doesn’t need the world’s best heart surgeon, he needs CPR to prevent dying on the table. Please recognize the urgency we find ourselves in and leave the so-called chess players to join those who stand as defenders of the Constitution. I implore you to reconsider your position on this. Nothing else of the 113th Congress will matter if Obamacare is fully funded. Geitner has already started the conversation by stating that it’s ridiculous we have a debt ceiling. They know once it’s appropriated for, that by default the ceiling will be raised indefinitely. Maybe the current, never before done, suspension was a trial run to ease us into this mentality. It’s madness.
This is the last letter that I will send of this nature. I hope future communications will be to acknowledge appreciation for efforts and votes that empower Americans instead of government. I refuse to let those that I have supported and promoted place me in a position to beg for the very representation they promised. I’m tired of my life being dictated by the need to babysit politicians. If I’m looking at it from a cost benefit perspective, the grassroots would be better served to begin grooming a primary challenger after every election as leverage and insurance, instead of this perpetual frustration and disappointment. I want some measure of my life back.
Please know it is with much regret that I send this message to you, but I love my children and my country too much to leave it unsaid. I will be in prayer for our Republic, for those who defend her and for those statesmen who fight against the tyranny. That reminds me of something you said at the 2012 LR dinner. You asked us why our enemies would fight so hard to destroy our freedom; because it’s priceless. You offered the analogy of the military as our insurance policy and their funding as the premium. Congress has that same duty and it comes in the steadfast fight against the plunder, oppression and abuse of power that is destroying this nation.
“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”– Galatians 5:1
March 26th 2013 will forever go down in history as the day Atlas Shrugged Part III was announced with a green light for production making it the last film in the epic trilogy following the novel by Ayn Rand published in 1957. The novel since that time has been consistently ranked as one of the best-selling books in history behind only The Bible and is the unique product of American philosophy which is exceptional any place in the entire world.
The pictures shown within this article indicate that the production group led by John Aglialoro plan to hit this final epic conclusion hard and with great passion. I had the privilege just a few weeks ago to watch Atlas Shrugged Part II with a Tea Party crowd which was deeply inspiring. (CLICK HERE FOR REVIEW) At the end of the movie there was open emotion in favor of seeing Part III as Part II ended on a cliffhanger that has not been seen since The Empire Strikes Back left audiences hanging on the edge of their seats for three long years. The producers of Atlas III will not make fans wait that long as they journey in 2014 to Atlantis which is nicknamed Galt’s Gulch in the novel.
For the millions who enjoy the book, they will enjoy the movie. For those who find Ayn Rand’s novels life shattering, they will hate the movie. They will absolutely hate what John Galt represents when they meet him and they will do everything in their power to stop viewers from seeing the film when it hits theaters on July 4th 2014. The best explanation for why some people, particularly on the left hate Atlas Shrugged and its author Ayn Rand so much can be seen from that same Bible series on the History Channel. The reaction critics have toward Atlas Shrugged is the same that the Pharisees had toward Jesus Christ. 
The message of John Galt is dangerous to such people, and they despise John Aglialoro for putting into film a book that is considered to be a menace to society by politicians like Barack Obama and his gang of collectivists. For that reason, it is a small miracle that the production of Atlas Shrugged Part III is going to happen at all, and thank goodness it is. There are people in the world that are desperately hungry for its message, and now more people than ever will have access to a masterpiece which is uniquely a product of American philosophy. 
