I will admit it; I do treat women differently than men. When I see a woman, I hold the door open for her, I speak to her with more courtesy than I would a man, and I tend to up the level of respect I give her—no matter who she is. In professional dealings I have never put my fist into a table and ran my head through a door—as I have with men—because women tend to deal with things intellectually so I’m always respectful of that. Girls tend to be smarter than men as men tend to be physically stronger than women so there are dramatic differences in dealing with them. The feminist movement has destroyed the respect that men used to pay to women out of this communist rooted notion of equality which has only managed to water down the respect that women deserve for being the mothers, wives, and daughters that they are within the family structure. The creators of the feminist movement sought an eradication of the family unit and they have been successful in their bra burning assault on the families of the world—and many of the modern social problems that are a result of their antics are exclusively their fault.
In my fiction women are often portrayed in a much more traditional sense—for instance in the Symposium of Justice it begins with a rape, because to me the looting of a young woman of her innocence is a severe crime. Once that is taken from a young woman it is gone forever. Other men treat women who have been fully explored by other men differently—they do not respect them. This is fine for the feminist who seeks to equal themselves to the dogs that men typically are—but for the pure of heart—it is a real crises to give away innocence to a man who throws it in the garbage for some cheap sexual experience. So the females in my stories always are portrayed in such a way of pure values and elevated respect. Those who have squandered away those values I often write about in a cheap and disrespectful manner because they have chosen to make themselves equal to men—which to me is a lesser value.
I have been like this for as long as I can remember and I’m not sure where I got it. Maybe it was because I watched a lot of westerns when I was growing up and the good guys in those stories tended to be very respectful to women. But from my first conscious moments—I have always felt this way toward women. The reason its important is because I just can’t see how society can actually advance if women are not made again into the pillars of society that they truly are. As I was reading through Edward Leedskalnin’s little book A Book in Every Home I discovered that Ed and I have virtually the same attitude toward women which was refreshing to see. Leedskalnin was quite a genius and I’ve written about him before. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW. I have been studying the man to uncover his secrets of anti-gravity–so far so good. But relevant to this present discussion is that of women upon which Ed had this to say in his nice little book.
We always strive for perfection. We are only one-half of a perfect whole, man is the bigger and stronger half and the woman is the other. To be perfect there must be two, but where there is two there is no room for more, so the third-party is left to go somewhere else with sour feelings.
A normal male is always ready to strive for perfection, the female is not. It is not only with human beings, it is the same with every living thing. If you watch a flock of chickens, where there is a rooster, and you add another rooster, you will see them fight to the death. One will have to go or be killed and this is the same thing with other living things.
Lower forms of life are guided by instincts alone so the present only comes into consideration. As soon as the other male is chased away, the female is as good as she ever was, but with us it is different. We are guided more by reason and thought than by instinct and so the present, past and future come into consideration. Now, if it is not good today, it was not good yesterday and it won’t be good tomorrow. That is why an experienced girl cannot be one hundred percent sweet.
According to my observation the girls are wrong in looking for their permanent partners. They are too quick. By being too quick, they only get those fellows with quick emotions. All quick emotions are irresponsible and short lasting.
There are two kinds of love—sensual and sentimental. Sensual love has the present and little future only. The sentimental love has the present, past and future, so it is more desirable. It will be slower but it will last longer. No, girls, when any fellow jumps quickly at you, you had better keep away from him. He has no consideration that the action would do any good to you. You are the weakest side, so you should have the better deal and if you don’t get the better deal, there is little brute in him and it may come very hard to train it out of him. The fellow who makes an advance toward you, and if he won’t state what the eventual purpose will be, he is not a gentleman. All men should know that the girl’s primary purpose is to find a permanent partner while they are young. Those fellows who fail to see this are not desirable to have around.
Now you know dear reader why I like Edward Leedskalnin so much—he is a reminder to me of what human beings have forgotten about themselves. The goal of every man should be to be a gentleman to women and respectful to other men who have committed themselves to young women in pursuit of a life-long mate built on sentimental love. It is a hard job and respect should be given to the takers who have signed up for the long-term commitment to helping the female realize her lifelong goal.
Women who have had this instinct pushed out of them by social re-engineering are not really women any longer—but strive to be men in a woman’s body. They seek to have emotional leverage over men when they need the advantage but not the violence that men often inflict upon one another when force is needed to resolve a conflict. So they avoid that violence by appealing to the traditions of women as a weaker sex. But in all other manners they expect to be treated equally—but only without the value.
In my stories I see no future in this reckless modern feminism—so my value migrates to the solid foundations of tradition. Most of the time I feel very alone in this—women appreciate my courtesy, but they don’t know what to do with it because the respect for the behavior has been breed out of them by progressive influences. In much the same way that human beings at some point in history levitated large objects with knowledge into anti-gravity so to is the basic respect toward women just as rare—and forgotten. However, ironically while I was trying to resurrect that past knowledge with hints at a forgotten time, I uncovered Edward Leedskalnin’s wonderful outlook on women and the value that they truly have, and why it is important to protect them for the betterment of our entire civilization. Modern feminists find Ed’s views diabolical, and a menace to their progressive philosophies—but history is proving Ed right and the progressives wrong with a dire warning that mankind must resurrect and re-implement—before it is too late and lost forever.
You can purchase Ed’s little book here:
Rich Hoffman
Visit Cliffhanger Research and Development
The Overmanwarrior 