The rich have left me at the altar many times so I will not blindly defend them at a sacrifice to myself. I support laissez-faire capitalism which would make more people rich and generate more revenue in America. But I do not speak against President Obama’s “tax the rich” policy to protect the rich against government looters like Obama, but to protect America from socialism which is what such taxing policies are. In fact it is the exact policy of the current president of France who is a member of the Socialist Party. Tax and spend is what they do, and I oppose them because their philosophy is corrosive to productivity. So with that in mind, in reaction to President Obama’s comments to my local congressman, Speaker Boehner about his intentions to raise taxes on the rich, I publicly say let Obama raise taxes, and let him take the responsibility for the result. Let him have his tax increase on the rich so that he will learn the hard lesson that the money raised will only be a drop in the bucket for an ocean of economic problems that are destined to happen because of the Democratic Party’s commitment to global socialism. To fight Obama and his naive understanding of economics is to make yourselves the villains and allow him to snake his way around to continue undermining the Republican Party through the blame game. Obama ran his whole campaign on this “tax the rich” idea, so the American people need to learn the hard lesson of his ignorance. Sometimes the best way to teach a child that the oven is “hot” is to let them get burnt.
The “rich” will shelter their money in other ways so they will not be impacted so badly. The House of Representatives gains nothing by taking a hard-line in the sand on the issue. The snakes will only end up biting Boehner and the other Republicans in the end. Logic does not work with 51% of the American public because they elected a fool for president, so let them have their loot and live to beat them over the head with it when they fail, which they will without question.
To pay taxes is to assume that the product the government produces is good. I personally do not endorse the product the government makes. Their employees are paid too much, there are too many of them, and they are grossly ineffective, and I reject the product. So I will personally avoid through legal means every tax increase thrown in my direction—because I do not like the product. But it is time for the socialists to be called such—and not hide behind the mask of Democrats, or Progressives, and it is time for them to have egg on that face that is revealed for what they are. To fight a fool only feeds their plight as more fools through collectivism will follow like rats the fool in front of them, and its time to let them run themselves off the cliff and onto the jagged rocks below.
I am aware that my statement may sound radical to those who have not been paying attention, and my suggestion that my friends, family and neighbors should openly break the law seems insane. But before the news hits the wire that I went on some crazy rampage of law breaking, be it known that I placed my thoughts about the balance between law and order, and the pursuit of freedom in my book Tail of the Dragon, which contains my opinion about the legal system’s merit, national and world-wide politics, and the rights of the individual to live a good life—and I will allow that book to speak on my behalf and support with much greater detail what I’m saying now.
Break the law—and do it openly. Shrug off the laws of politicians and their pages upon pages of regulations they produce and send them the message that their laws have no meaning. Buy radar detectors to cheat the speed limit, buy license plate frames that throw off speed camera detection, find ways to legally shelter your tax dollars from your local public school, find a way to work around the EPA and every other regulatory agencies. Find a way to break every law that restricts your freedom for the health of the liberty movement in America. Do it in the spirit of protecting you and your families from the “takers” so that the “makers” can live to produce again at some future time.
Ironically, I suspected that this time would come many years ago, and I know the question that will be asked next—what gives me the right to decide what right and wrong is? What gives me the right to decide what laws I’ll follow and which ones I’ll discard as worthless? If everyone does what I plan to do, the world will fall into anarchy and people will be killing each other for no good reason. Well, I examined this very issue in my 2004 book The Symposium of Justice—so before anyone claims that I am a crazed radical who does not have a right to drive too fast on the nation’s roads, or come and go where I please in any manner that I wish, or avoid corrosive taxes denying the needs of the many in protection of my self-interest, my thoughts are published in those two books and should settle the argument better than any court case, or media blitz that attempts to paint my future behavior in a negative way. The reason behind my actions is there in those books for all to read and cannot be edited by any spin masters in public relations, or online editors who might attempt to paint a picture of me that isn’t true. My true statements are copyrighted with the Library of Congress and cannot be altered easily.
There comes a time when people have to decide what side they are on, because taking a neutral position is no longer possible. Pleading ignorance isn’t funny any longer. People must decide if they are social “makers” or social “takers” and the battle lines are drawn right there. I will not adhere to laws that are designed to create more social “takers” at the expense of the “makers.” I won’t do it any more, and when the “takers” come to extort my participation, there will be big trouble, because I will not yield.
So break some laws and feel good about it, the more of us that do such things the better. I would prefer if I wasn’t the only one, but I will proceed regardless of mutual participation. Talks of revolution are toothless unless there is a willingness to push back in some way, and America is on the cusp of another revolution. It would be wonderful if such a revolution could be done peacefully without death and violence—but I am beginning to doubt it. The personalities in modern government are not equipped to govern my life, and that is why I declare that laws should be openly broken as a rebellion against corrupt authority.
I do not feel that way about all government. It gives me great hope to see that Sharon Kennedy from my community recently ousted a former radical Ohio Supreme Court Judge in Columbus. Sharon was a former police officer, yet the FOP did not endorse her for the election in 2012. For anybody who has read the Ohio Constitution it is a good document that is even purer and liberty loving than the Federal Constitution, but it is ignored and manipulated by many greedy lawyers looking for a way to game the system, especially at the federal level. The battle of our day is the fight between judges like Sharon Kennedy at the state level and those appointed by presidents at the federal level. The federal government believes that they trump state law and seek at every turn to make their intentions known. I respect the law that Sharon Kennedy provides. I do not respect the law that comes out of Washington politics. That is where I draw the line.
So break the law and do it with American pride. Don’t make yourself a pawn to the chess players of life in politics. Fight back by rejecting their laws and letting them know that you think they are irrelevant. Do it for the good of the country, and for your own sanity. But if you don’t do it for any other reason, do it for your own sanity. Breaking unjust laws is healthy for the liberty movement. If liberty is the goal, then more laws is the enemy, and it is time to declare such things so with more than just talk.
Whatever you call pure evil, the story below is the embodiment of it. If in the past you screamed for President Nixon to resign over Watergate you should scream the same thing of Obama over Benghazi, because it is much, much worse. If you declared that President Reagan should be impeached over Iran Contra, then you should say the same about President Obama and his Department of Justice head Eric Holder, because they are involved in much more sinister plans than anything done during that epic failure that would forever tarnish the reputation of Ronald Reagan. Benghazi has written all over it the worst of American politics, it involves death, sex, betrayal, and worse of all, a complete willingness by a sitting President to lie to the American public and to destroy the lives of everyone, and anyone to do it.
Glenn Beck has provided so far the best information about the Benghazi failure without over-the-top conspiracy theories. Many Americans simply are not evil, and cannot begin to wrap their minds around people who are—people who will do anything at any cost to win their position. And when it comes to the highest office in the world compounded with the fact that the players are extreme radicals, the recipient for destruction is self-evident to anyone who cares to look. Listen to these below broadcasts carefully and completely and you will learn all you need to know about the Benghazi situation that is behind the curtain of the General Petraus affair.
General Petraus was deliberately baited and set up to take the fall for a number of diabolical schemes that were already well in motion. And the Obama Administration is attempting to conceal their many crimes by making the entire Benghazi situation into one of sex which was the same strategy Clinton’s Administration used to cover up his perjury conviction in the House of Representatives in 1998, which many people forgot about, due to the successful distraction created by the Lewinsky sex scandal. The public was so infatuated with the presidential semen stains on the blue dress that they could simply not grapple with the severity of the perjury case. This is what you get when you elect lawyers into public office, and Obama is a radical socialist sympathizer who is also a lawyer. Click the bellow link to review the Clinton case.
By setting up Petraus to take the fall for the gun running operation that supplied the terrorists in Libya in order to overthrow Kaddafi, the Obama Administration had planted the seeds that Beck explained in great detail above. It should be obvious by now to understand why Obama called in the military action against Libya while he was in Brazil which caused so much of a stir, but again was easily forgotten due to the sheer volume of negative information the American people were required to digest of the evil being performed right under their noses.
The lawyer tactic used in all these cases, which all these former and present presidents employee to advance their power grabs–to cover their tracks in the wake of much destruction, is the “Crow Test.“ Click here to read my article on this diabolical scheme that is used every single day to cover the many crimes that happen in broad daylight. The sex scandal of Petraus is the overload information item designed intentionally by many evil minds to focus the mass public on information that they find more appealing, and sensational than the menacing truth behind the many deaths that have fallen in the line of fire from a regime of power grabbers that will do anything to have their way. That is why the punishment of these characters must be swift, and decisive. The minds of the public cannot be allowed to be toyed with like children easily distracted by the newest toy in their play pin.
Evil must be dealt with not with careful hands and pats on the back hoping to appease their temperament. Evil must be crushed—completely, and mashed out of existence. Failure of such conviction will ultimately destroy our country for all political parties, no matter what their affiliation. This game in Benghazi requires a conviction against evil, and anything else will allow more evil to encroach itself even deeper into American culture like the fulfillment of a Book of Revelations prophecy.
One of the keys to winning at war, according to the ancient Chinese literary classic, The Art of War is that the military strategist must “possess the heart to take hearts,” meaning you must not show mercy to your enemy even if they squirm on the ground when they are caught and beg for mercy. Such enemies must have their heads cut off when they are strategically outmaneuvered. If they are allowed to live, they will return to fight again the next time more prepared than the previous time, and such is the case over Benghazi in relation to President Clinton’s perjury conviction. The same tactics will be used later to conceal much greater crimes because they worked before, and will work in the future. The recipients of the manipulation lack the heart to take hearts these days, and evil knows it. That is why Benghazi cannot be allowed to be swept under the rug and justice must be pursued no matter who falls from power, or who goes to jail. All involved must be made an example of if America is to preserve itself as a nation and such justice must be pursued as though all our lives depended on it—because in a lot of ways—it does.
Obama dared everyone to come after him. I suggest many people oblige him.
“Pretty tough talk Obama, with your NDAA Act behind you and the entire military much of which you’ve managed to strip away the top ranking officials……………Hmmmm? I wonder what you’re up to?”
For all you ultra conservative Republicans who probably haven’t been in a parking lot fight in 60 years—if ever—Obama is calling you out. Usually when a guy talks smack like he is he’s guilty and trying to bluff his true position with brute force. It worked against Romney in the second debate and Romney backed off like a nice conservative and never brought it up again. Now Obama’s trying to do the same thing in front of the Benghazi congressional hearings. You’ll notice that the labor unions use the same tactic. The best thing to do when these types of thugs mouth off like that is to go over and give them everything you’ve got and then some. Because they are asking for it, and calculate that you won’t do it.
To understand what is wrong with many modern-day progressives just read their response to the Lebanon Tea Party post-election statement about how America will be well on its way to open socialism now that Obama has been re-elected. The link below is the smart-ass editorial from City Beat magazine apologizing to the Tea Party for helping to elect a socialist. Similar comments were heard on 700 WLW and other media outlets that quickly jumped on the Obama reefer truck after the election along with the other miscreants.
Most of the children who work at City Beat were literally born yesterday and the 1950’s seems like an entire century ago, and all they know about that time is what their public school teachers taught them. But it’s good to learn how those poor young people think—that youth who is so sure of their world-view that they are willing to flaunt a communist flag in the face of people who are genuinely concerned about the direction of the country, primarily because young people like the author of that article are so destitute in their thinking.
The reason people feel that the election of 2012 is a turning point for the country is because it is now obvious that logic has been suppressed most likely forever by stupidity and short-sightedness. The rebellious gestures of the modern progressive youth are functioning from a broken philosophy that will destroy America. To understand why, the video below frames the reason well. The belief system of a country makes up its philosophy and in those definitions are the success and failure of a civilization.
I have heard it asked “what happened to the Tea Party, why are they so extreme, and talking about socialism all the time.” Well, the reason is that it has been learned that it is socialism that we are dealing with, and anyone who chooses to read a book instead of drinking a pitcher of beer at BW3’s with a group of friends would know—because knowledge contributes to the philosophy of a nation—mindless evasion perpetuates the destruction.
I see the same kind of sarcasm shown in the City Beat article that is heard from kids in their twenties complaining about their parents as they declare their social independence. They often state how stupid their parents are, how overly dramatic, and out-of-touch. But what those kids don’t know is how hard it is to build a good life, and once they get a taste of it and pop out a couple of kids of their own to care for, they mature considerably, and adversely become more conservative as they get older and learn how the world works. That is why the political philosophy of fools targets the young, and influential, who are too lazy to read a book or learn things on their own—rather they just repeat what others have told them like a mindless parrot, and maintain the “hip” social norm—without working to discover who made those social norms “hip” to begin with. It is those types of people who elected Obama, and now like a child you’d like to help not fall on their face in life, they will feel the wrath of their philosophic commitment. The loss felt by those who struggled to leave them a good country is a slap in the face by those young City Beat employees. The Lebanon Tea Party has been fighting to prevent the inevitable, and they were ridiculed not only in the loss but by the snot nosed kids who mocked their effort.
Now we have to watch it happen, and happen it will, socialism will overtake capitalism and restrict the economic growth that made America what it has always been to most of us who have lived long enough to remember. When it does the smart ass kids at City Beat will then understand the meaning behind the Lebanon post-election statement—and they won’t think it’s so funny. Freedom requires intelligence and self-reliance, and those are traits in American philosophy that are no longer present by the youth who think they know everything already. It was those kinds of people who put Obama in The White House, and they will have to live with the consequences, which will come quickly.
Wait till they find out how expensive Obama Care is—that is the first step that will show the impact of their massive mishap.
If there is a great hope that I have for the future of civilization, it is in the philosophy advocated through Star Wars to the mass population, and specifically the youth. My views on this prompted Matt Clark and I to discuss the issue on WAAM Radio in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
In the story arch of Star Wars it is not about just one character, or even one family. It is a very encompassing idea that is nearly as complicated as Greek Mythology and is about the fundamental conflicts of a philosophy that embodies pure aggression and conquest against another focused on understanding. Within the story arcs done up to this point not only in the movies but the novels governments and the politicians behind them rise and fall many times, but always the heroes prevail through tenacity to give rise to another day. The one primary consistency in Star Wars is the prevalence of the Jedi Knights to always be present to offer logic and solutions, even when they find themselves enemies of the current political regimes. Sometimes they are on the right side of history as honored heroes, and sometimes they are fugitives fighting for their very existence, so whenever a long view is needed, Star Wars is a great mythology to partake in.
Under Disney it is my hope that Star Wars explodes culturally, not to make everyone sick of it, but in today’s tumultuous political climates and social atmosphere there really isn’t any other story that paints such a clear picture of right and wrong than Star Wars. At its roots, Star Wars is an old-fashioned story that paints the picture of moral dilemmas exceptionally well. It is my great hope that Star Wars under Disney ends up on cartoon stations, live action television and as many feature films that can be churned out from now till the end of time—because the essence of what Star Wars is about is good for society—because it invokes “thinking.”
So a theme park like the one shown above is not far off, and when it comes, I see big—positive things happening on a scale never seen before in any entertainment venture. To my thinking there is nothing more powerful in human society than the myths people live by. No invention of the human mind—be it cars, airplanes, electricity—anything, has the power of a great story. And Star Wars is a big story about big ideas. When the theme park is built, it will allow for the first time visitors to not only live out these big ideas within the context of a movie, or a book, but to walk around in these environments in a way that has never before been possible except with the massive resources of a big company that does great good like the Walt Disney Company.
When the new Star Wars Park opens, I will be one of the first in line with my entire family and I will be extremely excited to be there among the magic that perpetuates great ideas, and wonderful philosophy placed in a context that has significant social application. In my house we have over 265 novels and junior novels that capture the epic story of Star Wars with a literary legacy that is unparalleled. I have read most of them, my wife has read them all, and we will use those books to bring huge ideas to our growing family. It is a great relief to us to see that Star Wars will always be there for the decades to come and will become more of a reality than the fantasy that it currently is within our lifetimes.
I will readily admit that my view of America is traditional and I see Democrats dragging my country progressively to the left using the Overton Window concept. I do wish to erase the political gains they have made over the last 60 years. I do not say such things to bring harm to other races, or sexes. America through a Republican ended slavery, and was the first country on Earth to actually free anybody. Time would have taken care of the rest in spite of any interference by looting politicians. But Democrats have taken the credit over the years for the good deeds done by many strong Americans and they have continuously manipulated our country toward socialism acting as an internal enemy, and I am ready to see their influence upon my life diffused.
For many years the threat of a third-party candidate in Presidential politics has weakened the Republican Party considerably and forced them to adjust from the image of the party of “rich angry white guys” to one that is more inclusive to other ideas and people. This is in no small part a strategy cooked up in the minds of the worst, most diabolical progressives, as they have helped fund such third-party candidates so to split the will of the Republican Party.
The same should be done to Democrats, the very wealthy donors who have spent fortunes propping up candidates like Mitt Romney, and Newt Gingrich should instead pour their money into a fourth party candidate that will divide the votes of the Democratic Party. Republicans will always have to deal with Libertarians who naturally contain discontented Republican voters. The Democrats need their own menace to erode their stranglehold on American politics.
My suggestion would be a porn actress such as seen below. Pouring money into such a disrespectable candidate would pull away many of the votes that Democrats currently get. It would specifically target the drug users, the sexually addicted, the labor unions, the politically illiterate, and the diabolically stupid. There is no question that many in the Democratic Party would vote for a porn actress with the same enthusiasm that they have for Barack Obama, or the future candidacy of Hillary Clinton. In fact, a porn actress would help split the women vote who overwhelming cast their ballots for Democrats.
All this would work very well for Republicans and allow them to return to management of the government while the miscreants of society would fight over different versions of sluts to represent the sleazy and disrespectful. Failure to do so will guarantee more losses of more elections and eventually destroy the Republican Party completely under democratic mob rule of a socialist society. Republicans need to play such a game because future elections will be between Libertarians and Republicans forever, leaving Democrats untouched and unified. So it is time to give Democrats some competition within their own party for the good of the country and that needs to happen by funding their demise with a candidate who will split their support in the future—like a brainless porn actress to represent the mindlessly destitute and weaken the power of their vote in future elections.
Not much of a chance that the government whose in power, supported with cheers and whistles by the OBAMANATION, will ever investigate the multiple reports of voter fraud in Ohio and Florida. But Alex Jones has done a great job of covering these controversial issues, and this has made many Obama supporters very upset, and they have called in to Alex’s show to harass his team into not reporting the incidents. What follows is a fascinating radio broadcast that articulates the kind of collectivists who supported Obama’s re-election.
Republicans, this is the cost of not fighting hard enough. This is the cost of compromise, of “playing nice.” Compromise is not a dirty word if you are a progressive, but for everyone else, it’s as dirty as an entire sewage system. One of the great fall outs of Obamacare is that employers must provide the government mandated insurance if employees work over 28 hours per week. This will cause small companies like Target, and Walmart, and Home Depot to only allow their employees to work 28 hours per week. Welcome to the first costs of Obama’s re-election.
John Boehner is a nice guy, and he is my congressman–heck he’s practically my neighbor. I like the man. But Beck is calling the situation the way many Republicans are feeling it, and it is only going to get worse. For all those idiots who voted for Obama, and begged him to steal from the rich to give to the poor, and crush American businesses–good luck at finding a new job. Because they will be harder to come by than ever. Welcome to the OBAMANATION!
Yes, failure to act will mean the end of the Republican Party. They must adapt, overcome, and win instead of clinging on to what worked in 1980, when most people thought Reagan was nuts. The Republican Party then wanted George Bush over Reagan, which would have been stupid. You have to be in the front of the train of thought, not in the rear end. 12 million voters is a lot of voters who didn’t like the message and just stayed home. Personally, I’m supporting Rand Paul. Get behind him now, or its over forever. Hillary will start running for her run next week I’d say.
“America is over $16 trillion in debt. The “official” unemployment rate still hovers around 8%. Our federal government claims the right to spy on American citizens, indefinitely detain them, and even assassinate them without trial.
Domestic drones fly over the country for civilian surveillance. Twelve million fewer Americans voted in 2012 than in 2008, yet political pundits scratch their heads.
It’s not hard to see why, though.
To go along with endorsing a never-ending policy of bailouts, “stimulus packages,” and foreign military adventurism, the establishment of neither major party questions the assaults on Americans’ liberties I’ve named above.
As my campaign showed, the American people are fed up. Many realized heading into Tuesday that regardless of who won the presidential election, the status quo would be the real victor.
GOP leadership is now questioning why they didn’t perform better.
They’re looking at demographic changes in the United States and implying…
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
–Woodrow Wilson
Within hours of Obama’s re-election, long time media allies to the Tea Party were distancing themselves as they recognized that associating with a group who referred to the modern progressives as socialists was dangerous for their careers. It is dangerous to their careers because the bosses in the progressive party were putting down the clamps with memos and emails now that they had won four more years in The White House, and it was their intention to move the goal posts of America even more to the left than it was already, and those who stood in the way would find themselves out of a job quickly.
In the wake of the election there was a tinge that something wasn’t quite right. It wasn’t just because my guy had lost, but due to all the things that weren’t covered during the election that were very obvious–Benghazi, Obama’s past and presidential record, his radical association of friends—and many more issues were given a free pass. And quickly on election night the stars all lined up for Obama—one of the biggest jokes of a president in my lifetime. As I watched the smoke clear on the day after—I didn’t see any resemblance of my representative Republic known as America. Instead I saw a mob ruled democracy of fools claiming that they had won a great victory when in fact they had won only half the country + 1 welfare recipient desiring a Obama phone. They considered this a mandate to proclaim an overwhelming victory, and their behavior almost came as though it were scripted—even expected.
None of this made any sense to me until I thought of a book I read by Jim Marrs over a decade ago called Rule By Secrecy. Reflecting on that book, suddenly much of the election of 2012 seemed to become clearer. Shamefully it was the vast conspiracy theories of Marrs in that book that illustrated clearly my observations in the wake of that treacherous day in American history. It would seem that Jim Marrs, who can be seen below in the lecture series that he gave years ago was much more right than wrong. I highly recommend watching what Jim Marrs has to say in this very revealing lecture to put into perspective the events of modern politics.
There are no other directions to turn when it is learned that the election process can be manipulated by thieves who can overload the electorate with emotional voters who simply want the government to play Santa Clause in their lives. The plan utilized by so many members from the media all through the political halls of power is so predictable and self-serving that the system is not working the way it was intended, leaving people who do not agree with the politics of progressivism nowhere to turn. The politicians in office do not represent my values. Obama is not my kind of president. Congress is too manipulative—and soft, and the Senate seems like they come from a different planet. Yet listening to them speak on the day after, so many people believe that the progressive party’s narrow victories was a mandate to impose their will on the rest of us, and I can report that such a thing will not happen. Instead, I look to the work of Jim Marrs to understand why I don’t have a representative republic—because his view seems to be the only one that makes sense—even if it falls outside the realm of social acceptability.
As for me and many of the people I call friends, my America is the one that is old-fashioned. I like strong families, I hate drugs, I don’t like to drink or get drunk. I like to read books, I like to learn—I like to take care of my children and be close to them. I like to shoot guns and keep my life to myself. In other words, I like most the America of yesterday, and I want it for my children tomorrow. I do not want what the thugs, goons and imposing creeps of modern progressivism wish to give me and my family. It doesn’t matter if it comes from the Tri-Lateral Commission or just a socialist in the White House, they do not have a right to my life, and they will be denied when they come to my door. When they do my black flag will greet them, because I no longer believe in the political system. I’ve seen enough.