Being a “Bad Cop” is not the same as being a “bad guy.” But when dealing with people who have no understanding of their community imposition, of the tyranny of their collectivism, of their advocating gigantic government intrusions it is needed to have a “good cop” who will speak to the media and play the game the way progressives do, but there is a need for a “bad cop” to do all the things that the “good cop” can’t. Progressives have a lot of “Bad Cops” out there functioning fully, so the liberty movement deserves the same armament, and I wanted the role as far back as last year, primarily because the Lakota levy was gearing up for another try, and NDAA was signed into law.
The freedom I feel is similar to ending a job that one hates when you realize you don’t have to go to that particular building again and speak to all the people you didn’t like there. It’s like ending a relationship that was dysfunctional, but endured because of prior obligations. Once those obligations are fulfilled, you might be free to pursue another path leaving your mind free for the first time in a long time. For the last two or three years while representing many moderate personalities in Southwestern Ohio on issues raging from the Lakota levy attempts, to the Right-to-Work campaign in Ohio, to all the media contacts I had to maintain—I was constantly aware of what I said and to whom I said it. I had to be otherwise my ability to do radio interviews and get coverage in the newspapers and television would be limited as they tend not to cover radicals if they are on the political right—even though they do cover radicals on the political left. This left me always feeling like I was fighting a battle with my arms behind my back, and I was getting sick of it as 2012 dawned one year ago, only to see that government had a controversial new law that directly violated the Fifth Amendment, signed by the President on New Years Eve in the faraway land of Hawaii. Watching that progress it didn’t take long for me to realize that the liberty movement needed its own “bad cops” to counter all the goof-ball radicals advancing progressive causes at the expense of us all.
Now with 2013, I am free to act as I see fit without the burden of political correctness, which will be necessary to solve the problems that we are facing in America. I mean look at our dismal situation, a national debt of over $16 trillion dollars, a dysfunctional government, a communist president, radical teacher unions controlling the thoughts and lives of our children—and a whole slew of tax increases that will hit us all—at least those of us who already pay taxes. We are not in a good situation. Yes—I am looking forward to a very colorful year in 2013, one where I won’t hold back as much as I have in the past. Freedom feels good, it fills your lungs with copious amounts of fresh air, and lifts the spirit—and I am free to do what’s right without the restrictions of public sentiment. So to those who thought they had seen the worst—no, not even close. It’s time to shift gears and pick up some steam instead. It’s time for other people to play the “good cop” role, and its time for others to play the newly created “bad cop” role also. It is time to treat progressives as they have treated conservatives for years. The correct strategy with progressives is not with a pat on the ass and bribery whispered into their ears, but to treat them like dog shit that is found on the bottom of a worker’s boots. Starting in 2013, I have in my hand a scrapper ready to make sure the heel of my boots stay clean as I do my work. And it feels good!
I do love Christmas for all the reasons that tradition holds. I suspect that many people are lost to those reasons as culturally society has failed them. I noticed the longing gaze in the eye of a bank teller the other day when I took out the money to buy my wife’s Christmas present. I could see that she was married, and wished that somebody went to the trouble that I was for my spouse to see that she had a good Christmas. I revealed my plans to the young lady because of the amount of money that I was taking out in cash, which most people wouldn’t feel comfortable carrying around with them. I explained that this was the only way I could keep the present a secret from my wife with the hope of lasting till Christmas Day.
She let out several long gasps as she counted the money in stacks of hundred-dollar bills and I could tell that she wished for the same kind of cloak and dagger type maneuvers from her own spouse. I told her to be patient, that if she could stay married for a quarter of a century like my wife and I have, that such a thing would be possible in her own future. She smiled, at that and seemed to perk up as she lost track of her count and had to start all over again.
In all our years of marriage, there have only been a handful of times that I have been able to “catch” her with a surprise of any worth. Some years it is a treasured book that is hard to get, some years it is a gift that she would never buy for herself. Of recent years, I was able to give her a slick monokini from Victoria Secret that she could wear in the streets of Key West and Cancun without being too over-the-top, and not look like a 17 year-old-girl. Hard to do with her, and not cheap, since she is extremely picky—extremely. That was over four years ago, and I haven’t been able to get her quite that good since—until this year.
But the gist of the gifts have not always been about the money, or how much they cost, it is the value of the thoughts behind them, the scheming all in the name of love that goes on in behalf of coaxing just a bit of joy out of a loved one for just a moment. It is the selfish joy of seeing someone you care about open a gift that you carefully prepared, and plotted to give under the cloak of secrecy for the sustained joy of the gift’s intended recipient.
I suspect Christmas at my house this year will be one of the good ones, and I worked hard to position it that way, and the payday is on the morning of December 25th—and I frankly can’t wait. But as we wait for that fateful day, if there is a freedom fighter in your family, or a Tea Party patriot, a young NASCAR fan, a hopeless romantic, an avid reader, or just a rebellious renegade then might I suggest you give them for Christmas my book, Tail of the Dragon. Aside from a last-minute plug for the book, it is a story that will continue giving well into 2013, and they will love you for it. So if you order one now from the links below, the book should arrive well before shipping companies close down for Christmas, with Saturday the 22nd being the last day. Amazon.com has been sold out for most of December, but my publisher just sent them a heap of books to fill the need. And I’m pretty sure that Barnes and Noble has been able to keep up their stock. So this is just a friendly reminder for the last of those gifts you wish to give that special someone who are truly unique, there is still a chance to put Tail of the Dragon under the tree before Christmas.
For my readers here, I want to wish everyone a Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. No matter how dark and dreary things appear at times, it is always the human qualities that are best expressed on Christmas morning that ensure that the human race will always persevere over tyranny and chaos to find joy on a new day as the best of what’s in all of us come out on that wonderful—joyous day of December 25th each and every year.
I was listening to the news today as they discussed the Right to Work legislation currently pending before the Michigan State House. As is usually the case there was the obligatory union boss pontificating about how passage of such legislation would automatically doom any and all future labor to an abyss of virtual corporate slavery. As is also the usual, the person holding the microphone never even bothered to ask the most basic of follow-up questions like “Can you elaborate on that statement?”. Since the modern-day media is obviously nothing more than a sorry bunch of ideological hacks I thought I would do their job for them by asking the question myself.
Hey Union Boss! Explain in to me. You make such asinine statements, but the facts don’t agree. There are currently 23 states that have already passed RTW laws and from an overall economic standpoint those states are doing just fine without the need to force employees to accept union membership as a condition of employment. To the contrary, union laden cities like Detroit, Flint,Toledo, and Cleveland are collapsing in on themselves as the former jobs of those cities are being migrated to the more friendly confines of the southern RTW states. After having passed RTW last year Indiana picked up over 13,000 new manufacturing jobs. In that same time span Michigan has lost over 8,000 with their current “closed shop” attitude.
If you listen to the union battle cry they will chant sophomoric rhyming slogans about how it’s all about workers rights. Okay, great, now explain that as well. Exactly how is it an invasion of someone’s rights to simply give them the freedom of choice about joining a union versus being forced to do so? There is nothing in the pending Michigan legislation (or RTW in general) that prevents union membership. In fact, Taft-Hartley guarantees the right of employees to unionize. Therefore, no one’s rights are being threatened in the least by RTW legislation. So explain your statement, because quite frankly it doesn’t pass the smell test.
If you ask a hardened union member they will tout all of the good things that unions do for their members. Great! If that’s really true than the unions shouldn’t feel the least bit threatened simply by giving people the option. It’s like taking vitamins. If I see a real benefit from taking them I’ll gladly pay for them. I’ll use them freely where I don’t need someone to force me to do so. However, if I don’t see a real benefit than why bother? We shouldn’t be forcing people to join unions any more than we should be forcing them to take vitamins. If unions are as great as advertised than keeping up membership up without force should be a piece of cake. However, as Wisconsin and many other states have recently proven, that’s not the case.
So what’s this really all about? Well, as is usually the case, it’s not rocket science. As I mentioned above, in the first year after Wisconsin passed RTW the public employee union membership dropped by 56% as all those employees with a new-found freedom exercised that freedom. 56% fewer members translate into 56% less dues. So in reality this is all about union membership dues and the political power that those dues represent and has nothing to do with anyone’s “rights”. When fully 95% of union political contributions go to a single party it’s pretty obvious that party can’t live without the unions anymore than the unions can live without that party. It’s a marriage of convenience to say the least.
The Democrats tried unsuccessfully to get card check passed in order to enhance union membership by forcing open ballot voting. It didn’t work simply because the Democrats couldn’t come up with a single legitimate argument as to why it was necessary to permit such a coercive act without any justification. When it comes to losing all these states to RTW they keep losing that debate as well for the very same reason. The unions can hold all the statehouse rallies their little hearts desire, but what they can’t do is justify their own actions. In the mean time they have become a caricature of what a democracy is supposed to look like simply because the exercising of the freedoms democracy offers should at least have a purpose, and this debate has none.
I have heard enough about the gun argument that took place after the Jovan Belcher shooting/suicide which occurred at Arrowhead Stadium, in Kansas on Saturday December 1st. Belcher for all the reasons that impassioned youth build up a fury in their minds saw no way out for himself but suicide after he shot his girlfriend—the mother of his young baby during an argument. Many people have had such arguments with a loved one, and many times the rage can build up to a desire to obliterate the other person, even if deep down inside the love is great. The mind often distorts reality when perspective is misplaced, and people often do stupid things when they are angry. But as I’ve listened all week to the pundits fume for more gun laws, like what the big cities have around America—which are also Obama Zone voting blocs, the reality of the situation must be placed into perspective and not be allowed to migrate to the progressive arguments of rhetoric not based on reality.
The strongest case that progressive minded gun grabbing fools have for more gun laws is that the urban population is killing each other ruthlessly, and putting guns in the hands of such people is dangerous. Jovan Belcher is a product of this ruthless urban culture that is so highly praised among the media—and it is the creation of this dependent based urban culture that is the cause of many of society’s modern troubles—including gun violence. Progressives seeking to hide the crimes of their folly are pursuing fewer guns in society to cover up their political failures as a general philosophy. Much of that urban culture progressive creation can be heard in modern rap music which many young people like Belcher listen to often. The music is often violent, and contains a lot of race based anger, meant to fuel support of progressive philosophy, such as more welfare programs, an expanded and defined middle class, a destruction of American traditional value in favor of more global awareness with less individual sovereignty—along with a host of other platform points all of which can be seen in the Obama Administration. When pictures of Jovan Belcher are sought online, he is often seen wearing headphones which is common among athletes before a game starts—and I would be willing to bet that the music he was listening to was not Mozart, or Bach. If a young person puts garbage into their minds, of course garbage will come out in their behavior, so when young people like Jovan find themselves angry and insecure over being a new parent with a young baby that is depending on them to be a good person, and the spouse in a relationship has a whole set of values that are different from Jovan’s upbringing, conflicts are bound to happen, and Jovan dealt with the crises in the manner that he built the ideas in his head with like music, movies, television, and most likely large doses of meditating on the merits of “urban culture.” To understand that culture all one needs to do is play the video game Grand Theft Auto. I’m sure Jovan Belcher played that video game a lot. In fact—I’d bet on it.
(YES THE VIDEO BELOW IS THE REAL GAME AS KIDS PLAY IT EVERY DAY.)
But that doesn’t mean that guns should be outlawed because Belcher used a gun to commit crime, or video games because they allowed Belcher to fantasize about being a street thug—shooting and raping “bitches” so you can score points in a game like players do in GTA. It doesn’t even mean that music should be edited in any manner. If people like the urban stuff, the market has a right to exploit that consumer need. But who created that market need—where does it come from? Progressives—they are the ones who made the welfare culture, they are the ones who created the modern ghetto, they are the ones who are responsible for much of the gang violence that goes on, the drug use, the sex driven diseases like AIDS, the out-of-wedlock pregnancies, and progressives are responsible for destroying the modern family leaving many young people like Jovan Belcher without a good role model in their lives in the form of a father. Progressives have attacked the America father of tradition and attempted to replace them with a central government, and that is the cause of most social failures. The gun violence is just the symptom of the sickness created by progressives in urban neighborhoods, which nobody in their right minds would want to live in.
Where I live I would say that 90% of the homes within a mile of my home are armed with at least two guns and I can report that we do not shoot each other—ever. The guns are there for target shooting, for personal protection, and on occasion hunting. But there is an even more important reason for having those guns—they are there in case the military fails us, and the government moves too far to the left for our liking, we will need to use those guns to take back our country from a military that we have wasted a lot of money arming and training only to be used against us as a weapon.
One year ago President Obama with the support of the House and Senate passed the NDAA Act which gives permission to whoever is president at the time to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans violating their 5th Amendment rights on only the suspicion of terrorist activity by the president as defined by that same Executive Brach holder. I can say that if such a thing happens, I will no longer recognize the laws created by the thieves in Washington and an armed revolution will become necessary to overthrow the tyrannical government. That’s why we have guns, because government cannot be trusted except when the threat of armed revolt is present. If the government goes bad, the armies, and militias that are talked about in the Constitution become the weapons of that government leaving Americans defenseless.
In case political pussies like Bob Costas and the other progressive cry babies in the modern media didn’t notice, most of America did not vote for Barack Obama, by land mass. It is the urban vote that did–the costal regions and cities with huge sections of Section 8 housing and strong labor union presences. America as a whole is not in agreement with the idiots of New York and their progressive gun bans because deep down inside of everyone I talk to from all walks of life there is a strong belief that our guns will be needed to preserve our independence from progressives such as The United Nations and other members of Socialist International. The U.N. is making their global land grab using the same progressive philosophies that helped shape the mind of Jovan Belcher. It’s just a paper conquest as opposed to a traditional siege. (And for my older readers here, sorry for my use of strong language, but it’s needed in this case. There is more coming at the end, just to warn you) The characters who want to grab our guns today are the same type of people we will have to fight tomorrow, and to surrender our defense against their parasitic aims would be a fool’s paradise.
Every idiot who called out for more gun control in the wake of this most recent tragedy is one of the types of progressive minded people who helped shape the mind of Jovan Belcher in the first place. If Belcher did things in his life my way, he would learn to hunt and fish on his own, he’d know how to fix his own things in life both mechanically and psychologically, and he’d be listening to classical music on his iPod instead of urban rap, and he would have paid attention. Young people love leadership, they soak it up like a sponge, and it says a lot that Belcher went to see his coach in the darkest hour of his life—probably because that was the strongest male figure in his life at the time. Most of the urban crimes in society could be solved if the world had more strong fathers for young people to look up to, because the progressive experiment of destroying fathers is what caused Belcher and many other troubled youth to not have the mental faculties to deal with crises in their lives. The fault is progressives and their urban culture policies, and the fix is in introducing young people like Belcher at an early age to more self-reliance, and positive role models. Progressives have sought to destroy positive role models so that society would have a greater need for a more centralized government who cared for everyone and everything, and the world with its current miseries is their fault. So with that said it was not the gun that caused the terrible events at Arrowhead Stadium, it was progressive philosophy, and for that they can all hang their heads in shame.
And to my conservative mild-mannered friends—don’t be afraid to call people like Costas a pussy—because he is. He makes a living interviewing celebrities and commenting on sports—the worlds great distraction. He had no right to bring his ass kissing ways to our living rooms when all we wanted to do was watch grown men run into each other at full speed and knock the shit out of one another. Costas should have kept his mouth shut and not stuck his nose into an issue he is not qualified to speak on—since he has made a living as a “yes man” not a defender of liberty or even a man of self-reliance which to me is the only kind of man there is. Tyranny and slavery are built on the backs of people like Bob Costas who seek to fix the symptom, not the cause so that the bright lights of a football game can resume without guilt.
I have declared openly that Obama is a functioning communist. It looks as though he was raised as a communist and it’s all he knows. And as anyone who understands such things knows, socialism is a big step toward communism. Socialism is like having a diet Pepsi where communism is a regular Pepsi. They are both sodas, but one is loaded with all kinds of nasty things, whereas the diet drink is intended to simulate the regular drink while avoiding all the nasty stuff. Because Obama is a communist advancing the diet drink of socialism with great abundance the American economy is suffering terribly, and nobody wants to discuss it because socialism is a bad word in America. So nobody calls it out by name.
Socialism started in America with labor unions and really kicked into gear during the Red Scare in the 1930’s leaving the progressive president FDR to enact many socialist American programs in his New Deal to respond to global communism that was sweeping the planet. This is how we ended up with Social Security and many other intrusive government programs. But socialism didn’t stop there of course and is now advancing aggressively under Obama into nationalizing industries by the Federal government so that central authority control can be put in place—which has been the intention of communists all along—supported openly by many politicians, Obama simply being the latest.
It is hard for many people to believe, but the truth is what it is. In Europe, which politicians like Obama love as an example of governance—but traditional Americans despise–socialism is out in the open. In fact France has a socialist president. In England socialism was hidden behind the name of the Labour Party and of course in America it was sold as the party of Democrats and the umbrella of Progressive politics. But now Greece and Spain have openly supported the actual title of socialism.
Of course all these countries functioning under socialism are failing economically because socialism takes away personal responsibility and allows the weak and unproductive to feed off the exploits of the productive, and such a theory will never work in a million years. It’s naive at best. So after the French president was criticized for his high taxes on the rich, and companies threatened to shut down because they are owned by “the rich,” he simply replied that France could nationalize its industries instead of them functioning under private ownership, and he pointed at Obama as his gleaming example for what was going on in the United States. Click the link below for more info.
It cannot be denied any longer. Socialists are attacking our American way of life and they are doing so ruthlessly. They are in essence predatory parasites, meaning they function as a collective of weaklings that require the looted efforts of strong backed individuals to carry them through life. So it is time to meet them on the battle field and stop coddling them like infants crying for a pacifier. Without capitalism America will fail, and for all the young kids reading this who thinks that what I’m saying won’t affect them, let me provide an example of capitalism and socialism that they might understand. In the world of video games, over 10 million people play World of Warcraft. Many of those 10 million people spend 5 to 6 hours a day playing that massive online game in a world of their own making with other players all over the world. On weekends they spend over 12 hours per day. It is likely that many of those 10 million either voted for Obama or support him without knowing why. The idea of extended unemployment benefits, higher minimum wages, food stamps and many other government programs is very appealing to these young gamers, because it gives them more time to play their favorite online game with their virtual friends. But the reason these people play the game of World of Warcraft is because in the real world, their lives are much more limited, and heavily regulated. In the game of W.O.W a game player can spend all day working hard for their currency and leveling up their characters because they can see the results. W.O.W. is a successful game because it frequently rewards players keeping them interested in playing the game. But imagine playing W.O.W all day every day and then having the makers of the game tell players that they must send 50% of all the credits they’ve earned, and the skills their characters have acquired back to the video game manufacture as part of their fee for keeping the game operating. Or that the game designers wish to give new players in W.O.W some of the other players money so that World of Warcraft would be more “fair and even” for new players who wouldn’t have to feel so bad when they were playing with and against players who have invested 200 to 1000 hours of time on W.O.W and have leveled their characters up to become very powerful. If the makers of World of Warcraft did such a thing, the game would become very unpopular, and people would leave. That is the difference between capitalism and socialism. W.O.W. is a very capitalist system. Players pay a small fee to play the game but get to keep most everything they make and produce within the game. That is why W.O.W is successful, just like any economy, real or virtual.
In fact, it is partly because of this massive online gaming presence that members of the United Nations under control of Socialist International are looking to regulate trade and access to the internet. They have seen that online games are a threat to their global philosophy. Games like WOW that has over 10 million active users, and Star Wars: The Old Republic which has over 1 million and growing since it’s a very new release, along with the many millions that play Call of Duty on Xbox live every day, or Madden Football, or any number of releases are enjoying online PURE CAPITALISM because there is no limit to what they can do, only what their minds and time can produce. When politicians and even parents wonder what the great appeal is to online gaming with kids, it is that games are pure capitalism still, and Socialists International fears that realization because they control every other aspect of human life in some form or another—and have come to realize that they must gain control of the online world in some way soon—starting with an online sales tax. When it is asked why kids don’t want to play outside anymore, think about it—half the neighborhood neurotic mothers who also vote for school levies pad their kids up for safety instead of letting them get bumps and bruises. Making playing outside difficult with knee pads and helmets just to ride a bicycle pushes kids somewhere else where they aren’t so restricted, just like any businessman. Kids go online and play games where they can be free.
Socialism takes away the ambition to do anything. I feel it myself. There are a lot of things I would do that society would greatly benefit from, but to be honest, I don’t want to deal with the pin-headed bureaucrats to make those things happen so I stay out of the market place. If things were deregulated, I might do more that would benefit society, but since doing anything productive these days requires a major pain in the ass investment of time and money, it is simply not worth it. So I write books, because looting socialist bureaucrats have not yet found a way to tax the ideas that come out of my mind since they don’t control my thinking. And there is a part of me who understands young people who would rather play a video game than to start a new business. Because in the game, even though none of it is real, the player at least gets to keep what they earned while investing their time. In real life, politicians guided by socialism want to take some of what everyone earns, so many young people just lock themselves in their bedrooms and play World of Warcraft filing for food stamps and other welfare programs rather than get a real job that’s unsatisfying, because they want more time to play their games.
Socialism is the culprit that is ruining the lives of Americans, and it is politicians like Obama who are advancing that destructive political philosophy most aggressively. It doesn’t matter how much he smiles, or speaks, and manipulates, he is a socialist who also happens to be a lawyer with a proven history of taking great liberties with the truth. Whoever supports a person like Obama is a damned fool and is directly responsible for the destruction of America. Because once Obama and his fellow socialist have nationalized the world’s economy, they will come after the video game industry to eradicate from the minds of mankind any trace of capitalism forever. That is when the young people playing W.O.W. will have wished they paid as much attention to politics as they do the story lines of their video games, because if they had, they may have been able to stop the spread of socialism that destroyed everything they knew and loved.
I knew there was a reason I always liked Darryl Parks from 700 WLW. On his first Saturday show of December 2012 he offered an excellent reason why Kelsy Hartmann from Huber Heights—was caught having sex with one of her 16-year-old students in her husband’s car while pretending to do some last-minute shopping on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. According to Kelsey’s latest evaluation she was an excellent teacher, leaving Darryl to conclude that Kelsey was simply doing what many other teachers have been doing in the competitive field of public education, and that is to personally reach out to their students to give them something unique that all the evolving education tools are doing better, such as the modern computer. One thing that a computer can’t do for young students is have intercourse with them to keep their interests so during these very difficult times when school budgets are shrinking, and work forces are being reduced teachers like Kelsey have determined to stay on top of their students–quite literally. Maestros de escuelas públicas de amor tener sexo con hombres jóvenes y chupar sus penes! No wonder so many parents support public education for their needy young sons. And no wonder so many students take to the streets to tear down the signs of tax opposition when school levies are attempted. The young boys of public education know they can’t get sex this easy anywhere else but in their classrooms, so they defend their sexually charged teachers with a fury. Check out the pictures of Kesley at Darryl’s blog posting, and then listen to his Saturday broadcast below.
I think Darryl is right; Rosetta Stone software has changed the field of foreign language education. In these modern times of 2012, it is rather easy to learn a foreign language should one wish to, completely invalidating the old archaic style performed in front of a classroom. The two years of mandatory high school foreign language education is absolutely out of date—because the modern computer does a much better job than a traditional teacher. So credit must be given to Kelsey and her barrage of other public school teachers and their labor unions all around Ohio who have tener mucho sexo con hombres jóvenes y tragar su semon en cantidades tales que los maestros beben su hombría por la taza con el café. And we thought teachers were drinking coffee in the morning……………………..apparently not.
A computer can teach young students in high school better than just about any teacher in any course these days—math, science, history and especially foreign language. Since most people learn by visual stimulation, the computer is much better equipped to perform most of the modern education tasks with far superior results than the traditional teacher, and the computer is a lot cheaper on labor too. But a computer will not steal the keys of her husband’s car and meet with students on the side of a road and have sex with them to keep their interest in public education like Kelsey and her other tri-state teachers will. That is the one thing the computer cannot do better, and that is actually provide such “hands on” training.
So whenever a school levy is voted for, and support for public education is declared, think of the over the top and under the covers antics of many fine teachers like Kelsey Hartmann and how dedicated to their students they truly are—so much so that they are willing to stay on top of their students needs—literally. Kelsey le encanta sentarse sobre el pene de sus alumnos en el asiento trasero de un coche. Auuuuhhh…………….public education at its finest.
Lucky for Tim Geithner that I wasn’t sitting across from him when the White House instructed him to tell the Republicans on the Hill that cuts to the deficit were not on the table during the “fiscal cliff” negotiations and only tax increases to the wealthy were an option. I don’t blame Mitch McConnell at all for bursting out into laughter at such a ridiculous proposal. I recognize that McConnell and Speaker Boehner have enriched themselves greatly as public servants, but they are at least functioning from the real world when it comes to matters of finance. Geithner and Socialist Obama aren’t even functioning from this planet—but rather are hell-bent on their Marxist dreams concocted during college pot parties about destroying the rich so the poor can thrive—attacking the bourgeois class then giving power to the proletariat through legally sanctioned theft. Geithner and Obama represent the destructive socialist nature of the modern academic, and are not at all interested in managing the finances of America by reducing the debt. Their only concern is to act as domestic terrorists by wreaking the economy so that the wealth of America will be redistributed throughout the world. You can read about Mitch McConnell’s reaction in the Huffington Post, CLICK HERE.
As people who have had to sit across from me in these kinds of talks can attest—with much less at stake, I would have likely knocked Tim Geithner’s fu**ing head clean off and kicked it across the Atlantic Ocean back to Europe where Geithner and Obama’s world vision belongs, upon hearing such a ridiculous and insulting negotiating position. It is offensive to listen to these progressive fools utter the kind of nonsense that they are advocating in this current fiscal crisis. It would appear that all progressives no matter what level of office they hold perform in the same terrorist fashion. They evade the truth, build their case with emotion, and look for consensus among the ill-informed and down-right stupid to back their infantile strategies hoping that democratic thuggery can trump intelligence in the court of public opinion. They use fear to sell their distorted ideas and that makes them terrorists by any definition.
Even in my local school district of Lakota where I was on the front line of three tax increase defeats progressive education specialists refused to listen to the will of the voters and instead lobbied for yet another tax increase attempt—just like the idiots in the current White House. The people who backed me on the tax defeats told the school to simply reduce their labor costs by 5% so the district could live within their current budget—which would have required the school management to instruct the labor union to take a 5% cut in pay—or take a hike—which progressive management refused to do. Infuriated I let my anger explode at the ridiculous progressive policies that had emerged from educators in my community as it became clear that financial sustainability was not the objective of the school, but a radical wealth-redistribution scam advanced by labor unions hiding behind the façade of government support. The goal of the tax levies was not to educate children, or to even have a good school. It is to increase taxes to the extent that the “wealthy” pay more in the form of higher taxes on their property so that wealth redistribution can take place. Progressives in education are willing to destroy anything that gets in their way, including the communities they pretend to serve, in order to advance their radical agendas, and they do it with the same selfless conviction of a World War II kamikaze pilot from Japan.
Geithner and Obama are doing the exact same thing in the macrocosm of national politics that I have seen at local schools everywhere—it is all part of the same progressive battle plan. It has nothing to do with money management, and everything to do with radical change in stealing from the bourgeoise and strengthening the proletariat without the wealth being earned by those characters—and they get by with it because nobody understands history or the definitions of what progressives are really up to. Geithner thought he could pull the wool over everyone’s eyes with his gross insult to America and not propose cuts to the deficit. But only an attack on capitalism was put on the table to curb spending that Obama is guilty of perpetuating. Geithner is lucky he is dealing with politicians who have soft hearts because they have gotten wealthy off the public dime, like McConnell and Boehner—and Obama. McConnell only laughed at the ridiculous proposal. I see it as an invasion of my country by domestic enemies from academia.
The only issue that should be on the table in 2013 is a reduction of the deficit. At $16 trillion dollars there is no other matter of importance that should be on anybody’s mind. Even I said two weeks ago that Republicans should cave on the tax increases so that the socialist Democrats can choke on their decisions. But my concession was based on budget cuts which it would be assumed would be a foregone conclusion. However, Democrats have shown their cards at the negotiating table and they are not playing the same kind of game that the rest of us are playing. They are looking to undermine America with even more debt and to break the ideological back of tradition with a fury that no American is comfortable in admitting. Geithner showed his hand, and that is the intention, which is why my reaction would have been much more violent than McConnell’s. The strategy of Obama and his goons is insulting and obvious to anybody with basic intelligence. Unfortunately many people have shown that they are willing to look the other way so long as Obama, Geithner and the other White House terror squad are willing to steal on behalf of the proletariat and level the playing field for the lazy, the corrupt, and the destitute in exchange for a vote at election time.
The post-election exit polling proved that Obama got a big bump simply by showing up for a photo-op with Chris Christie after Hurricane Sandy even though he was only on the ground for a very short time. The reply from most respondents was that they thought it showed how much he “cared”. This commentary isn’t about bashing Obama for what he did or didn’t do. It’s about bashing the ignorance of people who would ever vote for any candidate, whether Democrat or Republican, for such a stupid reason. Personally, I don’t waste time concerning myself about how much any politician cares. What I do concern myself with is if politicians are doing the right things regardless of whether they care or not.
It shouldn’t really matter if a politician is white or black, gay or straight, man or woman, or from any other type of demographic. Nor should we be looking for exact perfection in any candidate’s philosophy or character. The way I see it, the only way I’ll ever find a candidate that agrees with me on every issue is if I run for office myself and sometimes even I find myself conflicted. As far as I can tell the only person ever to have had a perfect character ended up getting crucified for it. For the rest, none of us are completely sin free, so why hold up unrealistic expectations about our candidates?
In the modern era of politics we find ourselves perpetually complaining about how terrible our government is. The current congressional approval rating is floundering in the single digits. Since the current Congress is evenly split on control both sides are equally at fault. However, the real blame for all this mess actually lays with us the voters. We tend to put far too much emphasis on the emotional aspects of who we vote for instead of considering the logical tools that are required for our politicians to find the appropriate answers to today’s issues. To put it bluntly, we aren’t getting the right answers from our politicians because we’ve become so apathetic about the things that really matter that we aren’t even asking the right questions in the first place. We allow the media to waste time discussing whether Obama is a Muslim or about Romney being a Mormon. Who cares when we should have been demanding that both explain how their tax strategies would have worked.
We fret over political correctness when in truth political correctness is nothing more than a buzz word for censorship. We waste time complaining about all the political discourse and whether our leaders get along, play nice together, and compromise instead of worrying about them getting things right. Political discourse shouldn’t be cursed, it should be celebrated. I could care less if our leaders don’t like each other and have disagreements. What I do care about is that they find real solutions to real problems even if it does elicit some name calling along the way. Besides, disagreements are actually a good thing in both business and politics because it means you are looking at issues from various angles. As a business leader I don’t want to surround myself with a bunch of “yes men”. I prefer those around me to give me their own thoughts regardless of if they agree with mine or not so that we don’t overlook any potential obstacles when formulating solutions. What we don’t do is compromise on the right answer just so that we can all get along.
Two plus two equals four. If someone tells you it’s five they are wrong, period. It’s useless to settle at 4 ½ because that isn’t the right answer either. I don’t want politicians compromising just so they can get something passed. Instead, I want them to hash things out in the arena of ideas until they come up with the right answer. Otherwise, the compromise typically won’t fix things and is likely to cause a brand new mess all its own. Whenever I hear someone say that they are willing to reach across the isle, I only want them to do so in order to slap someone upside the head when they are wrong, not so that they can take the easy route of compromise. I want to see politicians wise up, stand up, and put their middle finger up to the whole concept of conceding to an inferior solution just to get along.
Allowing any politician to slide by simply by taking the emotional cliché response to an issue not only lets them off the hook, but typically creates an even bigger mess than what the original issue started out to be. For example, someone might make the emotionally compelling argument that we need to raise the minimum wage rate. It’s easy for a politician to sign off on such an idea by simply claiming that they are only looking out for the poor. However, what doesn’t happen is any attempt to look at the long-term effects brought about by such an idea. Yes, those at minimum wage will get a raise, but what also happens is that fewer jobs get created, worker hours get cut, prices go up, and businesses go bankrupt. If Wal-Mart is forced to raise its pay scale every politician for miles around will give themselves a big pat on the back while proclaiming that they played a part in making it happen. What you won’t see is the same response when the layoff notices also start flowing.
We complain about politics without realizing that it is our own apathy that makes us part of the problem, not part of the solution. We become our own paradox by demanding so much from our politicians while at the same time asking so little. We want to exist in a wonderful world of entitlements, but never bother asking where those entitlements are coming from. We spout talking points without any knowledge of what the adverse affects of those talking points might be. We accept the promise without questioning the premise. In the long run having Obama win a second term doesn’t really scare me. It’s the concept behind why he won a second term that scares the heck out of me. It’s easy for a politician to destroy a nation by making all the wrong choices. However, no politician, no matter how much they care can save a nation. Only the people themselves can accomplish that task, and even they can’t do it through apathy or emotionalism. We can only save ourselves once we become part of the solution. That’s when caring really counts.
Much of the work I do here, and why I conduct it so fervently, is because the human race is at an impasse, and the quality for which we deal with that issue will determine our species fate. When I blast away at the progressive political platform it is not just to embrace the values I find valuable which might be summed up in every John Wayne movie ever made, or the tone of Walt Disney’s America shown gallantly in the television series Davy Crocket. What I love about America is captured in those artistic tributes to traditional value, because within those tabernacles of virtue is a formula for human prosperity. Progressives on the other hand are stuck in an old version of human fairness pursuit from a world that predates the Industrial Revolution and are functioning from a philosophy that is dangerous to themselves and everyone on this planet—the concept of collectivism. The reason why is in what is coming up rapidly for the human race—because each and every one of us must come to grips with it very soon—as in thirty years or less. That perilous impasse that is meeting us faster than we are meeting “it” is called THE FUTURE. Watch the below videos carefully and take notes.
With computing power being what it is now, and what it will be within 10 years, the mysteries of the human brain will be solved and the idea of what a “soul” is will become clear. Human being will gain the ability to UPLOAD their identities into other bodies which will prevent even accidental death by tragedy. In fact, sex, race, and even human ability such as strength, height, and physical attractiveness will all be options in the world of tomorrow. The idea that has been introduced to us all though avatar creation through social websites like Facebook and Twitter as well as the online gaming world are metaphorical instances of a reality that is coming to our daily lives. Online gaming such as seen on games like World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, and many others will become a reality for our own bodies—especially as the younger generation moves into their 40’s and 50’s. They will have no problem making these difficult psychological adjustments as they have been playing computer games their entire lives and have created thousands of online characters all representing key aspects to their human souls. The body those souls reside in do not matter as much as the essence of the spirit behind the soul.
Education of tomorrow will be as simple as uploading a new program into your home computer. A child could reasonably have uploaded onto their brains the entire wealth of knowledge of the human race in just a few decades from now completely eliminating the need for classrooms known so well in traditional education which has proven ineffective. 12 to 18 years of study in schools is unnecessary in the world of tomorrow as knowledge is simply an upload not created by neuron building through repetition as it is today, but data directly implanted onto neurons constructed upon an upload of the data. So holding on to the old, archaic formula that the government is driving is a foolish gesture that only holds society back unnecessarily.
There are literally millions of such difficult technical advances that are coming our way within the next hundred years so it is important that during these transitions government is reduced to a minimal amount, because these new technologies will be devastating in the hands of overreaching government dictators. It is best to eliminate these threats to the human race now rather than deal with them later when ousting their power will be much, much more difficult. But they will be ousted. Their days are numbered because I can say that the youth that grew up with online gaming will not put up with such restrictions. In video games many of the environments are best reflected by laissez-faire capitalism. It is this type of economy that is most prevalent in the online world because politicians have not learned how to loot off of it—but it’s too late. Too many people have had a taste of pure capitalism online, and will expect it in the years to come. Once they learn that the economy of the real world is caused by political tampering, they will become very angry—and active. Currently many citizens tune out of politics preferring fantasy evasion over grim reality so long as they have enough money to buy new video games and pay for their basic living needs. But if that is threatened, they will expect laissez-faire capitalism and won’t understand the politics of United Nation power grabs like Agenda 21 or the fairness merits of socialism. In the world of computer gaming no such fairness is appreciated since all computer users are equal—they can be as big and strong, fast or slow as they desire when they set up their avatars. What separates the good from the bad is effort and commitment something the most devout video gamer understands very well. It is only a matter of a few years that those kinds of options will be available to the masses in reality.
Some of the great quarterbacks of old from the game of Football is Doug Flutie and Joe Montana—both guys were about 5-10 weighting about 190 to 200 pounds. Just twenty years later most quarterbacks are 6-5 and weigh 240. Evolution is happening and technical advances will soon make quarterbacks that are 7 foot tall and weigh 300 pounds. These advances will occur because the game will demand it through competition. And if a player gets injured, instead of going on the IR for the rest of a season, he will simply upload himself into a new body that he has constructed to use as a backup while their primary body heals. Paralysis and handicaps will be a thing of the past. These things will happen whether or not we are ready for them, so it is our job to get ready for them, and to focus our philosophies and religious on ways to train our minds to contend with the adjustments. But the path of the political progressive is a doomed one. They are literally clamoring to outdated ideas that were put into motion a 100 years ago and are trying to hold society back politically to preserve them from the changes that are about to flood society with the dawn of a new age just as revolutionary as the Industrial Revolution.
Speaking for myself I never plan to retire. I don’t see myself living in a Florida condo taking 20 pills a day just to stay alive and watching the sun rise and set waiting to die. Rather 100 years from now I plan to still be active doing all types of projects pursing the ideas my mind craves to consume, and I plan to run over any political ideology that gets in the way of my doing it. I’m not in love with power or politics in any fashion. I just want to be left alone to live my life in the fashion I want to live it. And in the future it will only be easier—not harder to do such. The impediments of our age are manufactured and false made uselessly cumbersome to protect the empires of old and their out-dated thinking that runs counter to what’s coming. It does no good to pander to these types of people because it only delays the inevitable. The future is an exciting place but it will be radically different from the lives we live today. That is why it is important to preserve the American Constitution as the blueprint to a healthy society of tomorrow so that they power grabbers of corruption can inflict minimal damage in the days to come with archaic beliefs that are a century out-dated trying to hold back a future that is coming at us with a fury.
If you ever wondered why your community is building sidewalks to nowhere, or cities seem hell-bent on constructing streetcars, or your local public school constantly uses terms like “global marketplace” and learning initiatives it is because your school, your city, and your community are following United Nations Agenda 21—and the goal of this diabolical scheme is foreign control of The United States with a gradual massive redistributive wealth plot spread across the entire world. In essence, the intention of Agenda 21 is designed to steal the wealth of America along with the tendency of freedom that only exists on the North American continent and replace it with a centrally controlled government functioning within the U.N. in Europe.
Agenda 21 has already been at work for over 20 years and it is only now that the intentions of robbing Americans of their freedoms are becoming evident. The strategy has been to gradually get Americans to accept government regulations they would otherwise reject by selling them little bits of goodness like parks and sidewalks in suburban areas so that trust will be earned in surrendering freedoms to a foreign entity, in this case a coalition of nations.
In my neighborhood of the ultra conservative Liberty Twp., Ohio Agenda 21 is showing up in the Vision Plan Committee as seen at the link below.
I know Roxanne Qualls personally and can state emphatically that she is an ultra political progressive along the lines of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Mayor Mallory—Obama’s personal buddy. When questioned about Agenda 21, people like Qualls will laugh about what a conspiracy such a thing is—and she believes she is on the high side of morality, and will attack anyone who thinks differently from her. For context, I once gave Roxanne Qualls while she was Mayor of Cincinnati in 1996 a t-shirt in her office stating “TAKE AN AXE TO OUR TAX” to encourage her to vote for tax decreases. She of course laughed at me—as predicted and thanked me for the shirt which I’m sure she threw away as soon as I left her office. For the rest of the contents of that meeting it found its way in fictional form into my novel Tail of the Dragon where Chet Watson speaks to Governor Royce. That scene was based on my discussion with Foxy Roxy the ultra progressive. She has been advocating Agenda 21 since it’s creation in 1992 whether or not she called it out by name.
Most of the time the advocates of Agenda 21 have no idea how the plan came into their minds—they just know they support it without question. This is the case of Karen Mantia the current superintendent of the Lakota School District. After many years as a teacher, and furthering her education to obtain a doctorate in the field of education, she had to run the minefield of Agenda 21 studies that were pounded into her head for two decades. People who are successful in education learn to say yes to Agenda 21. Outcasts who question it find themselves unemployed and on the outside looking in. So the higher the degree of study in modern-day university, the more committed to Agenda 21 they are. There are a few exceptions that I can think of right off-hand, but without fail, those exceptions have very strong families to help those students off-set the global oriented training that is provided in both public education and colleges. Many advocates of Agenda 21 accepted in their education days to blindly acknowledge such concepts and if they deny the teaching they either drop out of school to preserve their own ideas, or they fail their classes—because tolerance of other opinions is not what college is all about—or public education for that matter. In fact the goal of public education is not to inspire children to learn—but to teach children what social class they belong to—so that Agenda 21 can sort out the beneficial to their cause from the malcontents.
It is likely that many of the teachers employed under Lakota Superintendent Mantia as well as the school board have never heard of Agenda 21, because they see themselves as simple cogs in the wheel and do not question such things. Agenda 21 is a machine of many such wheels all connected to shafts that drive the machine in ways that each part of the machine seldom analyzes and this is how such things get advanced against the wishes of mankind—and how tyrants rise to power. Well-intentioned fools blindly follow the follies of some United Nations power grabber in a plot designed to rob America of freedom and wealth and distribute it to the entire world with a one world government superseding the elections held in The United States. That is the world these people are pushing for and it all starts with a sidewalk in your local community, to subtly gain the approval of the public through a very manipulative game designed to rob humanity of freedom in a naive preservation of Mother Earth.
Agenda 21 is in its simplest form an attack on American sovereignty without destroying the cash cow that supplies The United Nations with most of their funding and military might. The hope by these progressive insurrection artists is that a slow conversion in America from an individual based capitalist nation to a collective based managed economy ruled by Socialist International can occur without disrupting the global economy, much of it still at the mercy of The United States. The progressives themselves are collectivist oriented old hippies still trying to bring about the kind of world they imagined while they were experimenting with drugs in the 1960’s and 70’s, and they are a disgusting lot. The only places that such a world can be created under such impractical market values is in government where they can steal tax money to build the world of their distorted dreams—because all such thoughts would be snuffed out in the competition of the private sector. Progressives are the greatest threat to modern freedom, because they are selfless entities serving a collective idea centered around Agenda 21. If allowed to continue, within twenty years suburb living will be illegal, land will not be able to be purchased in any capacity, and all businesses will be collectively owned by the state—run by the United Nations. This is why progressives must be defeated in public education, local politics, state politics, labor unions, and environmental goof-ball organizations. We must get progressives out of our pockets and out of our lives otherwise they will never stop until they have taken every last liberty from America. It must be acknowledged that the national debt is part of this take over strategy because it takes away the power of the United States to manage their own affairs as a sovereign nation. Debt too is part of Agenda 21. So the threat is very, very real, and it is up to each and every American on how they deal with this crisis—because a crises it is. Ignoring Agenda 21 will not make it go away. Silently dismissing progressives won’t dull the knives they intend to stick in the heart of personal liberty. Playing nicely with those who think differently will only result in more loses to the radical left which is behind Agenda 21—even though it was George Bush Sr., who helped bring it to being in 1992. Without fighting for our freedoms, we will lose them to those who wish to sell freedoms away because they are not strong enough, or mature enough to handle their own individual lives responsibly. And the first of those yielded liberties evaporate with the construction of the community side-walk through a designated “green space,” and a school levy to maintain the power of progressive teacher unions. These evils begin there and must be dealt with as threats to life itself. There is no middle ground on this. The proof is all around us.
The Overmanwarrior 