Tag: overmanwarrior

The Danger of Agenda 21: Eating old people so the young can suffer

To understand what Agenda 21 is, the people who designed it for the United Nations with an aim of one world government, and what it will look like in the future implemented from cities like Hong Kong to Cincinnati, Ohio all you need to do is visit the birth place of it in Rio de Janeiro where the Earth Summit is routinely held.  Agenda 21 was created in the minds of European socialists while attending one of these Earth Summits as far back as 1992, but in reality percolated in the minds of collectivist oriented governments for decades, since the words of Karl Marx first touched their minds nearly a century and a half ago.  The Earth Summit has been routinely held in exotic cities like Rio and Cancun, Mexico to enamor the participants with familiar culture and high-minded thinking while topless women and string bikinis fill the sights and sounds of visitors with equatorial delight.  Both Rio and Cancun are examples of what the future of the world will look like if left to Agenda 21.  Both cities are filled with delightfully luxurious hotels and tourist accommodations while they are surrounded by extreme slums of people stacked upon each other in an inhumane fashion of compressed living and diabolical concessions to the human soul.  These cities are true glimpses of what the future of human civilization will look like under Agenda 21 globally.  Everything looks wonderful in the tourist areas, but for the workers who maintain the cities of Rio and Cancun—life sucks—big time.  Listening to Bob Silliman who is the coordinator of Ohio’s Agenda 21 awareness efforts I thought of a visit my wife and I made fairly recently to Cancun where the United Nations often holds their Climate Change Conferences and saw the future of my own community in the vision plans of local Agenda 21 planners.

At the end of Bob’s speech many in the audience contemplated what the end game was for Agenda 21, and why it was even being implemented.  Many speculated generally that it was power that was the intention—but as the young lady who stood up at the end declared, even if radical environmental leftists like George Soros wanted to use Agenda 21 to gain power over massive municipalities of people he would be long dead by the time Agenda 21 takes full hold in America—leaving the question mostly unanswered.  The menacing answer is much more severe and difficult to comprehend.  The people from the United Nations who fly in to participate in the Earth Summits and Climate Change Conferences in places like Cancun and Rio see the glitter of tourism and exotic locations and find themselves enchanted by the beauty of the Earth.  Often they don’t travel too far from their hotels so they don’t see the massive slums that the people who live and work in those exotic cities contend with.  For proof of these summit locations check the links below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Summit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_United_Nations_Climate_Change_Conference

When my wife and I visited Cancun we were both astonished at the terrible living conditions of the residents just outside of the main strip in Cancun.  Even more shocking was the massive shopping mall like complex just down the road from the airport that held a multiplex of strip houses and sex shops.  The entire complex was one giant sex store that was reeking with human trafficking from young girls stolen from their families all over the world.  It made the sex store at Exit 141 in Tennessee just a few miles from Knoxville look small.  In the city of Cancun, Mexico if you head into the interior of the country within ten miles of the major hotels, once you pass the shopping mall of gentlemen clubs there is nothing for many dozens of miles, and for hundreds of miles in the Yucatan, there are only a few villages—many of them still containing thatched roofs the way a primitive might inhabit.  As my wife saw this for the first time after growing up in America and living all of her life in upper class conditions, she was absolutely aghast and wanted to help the poor Mexican people.  But the social conditions and politics of Mexico have imprisoned those poor residents of Cancun to be run by corrupt drug lords and the mobs who own all the hotels.  The government is run by the mobs, and this is what the United Nations is selling in Agenda 21.

In Mexico and Brazil the residents have been pushed through regulation and policy into the cities to live like rats under the command of central planners.  The living areas of these cities are terrible, and to call them slums would be a credit.  They are the result of the well intended global climate United Nations sympathizers who think they can contain the human spirit in a bottle to preserve the Earth from global warming.  Their intention of putting the human being in a bottle and holding them there so that green space thrives can be seen in Cancun.  Mexico has lots of green space…………..lots and lots………….and LOTS of it.  After traveling for a few days around the Yucatan Peninsula after being accustom to travel in America, my wife and I enjoyed a Big Mac at the McDonalds outside of our hotel like it was a feast at one of Chef Ramsey’s restaurants.   In fact, a Big Mac never tasted so good and my wife and I decided in that McDonalds in Cancun on Kukulcan Blvd that we would commit ourselves to saving America from United Nations global planners.  In America when we travel from Cincinnati to Louisville, or Cincinnati to Lexington, or Cincinnati to Columbus there is a lot of farm land that is being used productively, there is a lot of wonderful green space, and the Earth’s beauty is easy to see.  If there is one reason to go after Agenda 21 it is to preserve the Big Mac.  When I want a Big Mac, I can get one about every 20 miles no matter where I go in America—and that is a BEAUTIFUL thing.  Savor the moment—take a deep breath……………ahhhhhh…………capitalism.  Capitalism=Big Mac.  Two very wonderful ideas.

No place in the world has it so lucky as I do in The United States, and I would love to see places like Mexico, Brazil, and the entire continent of Africa have a life as good as I have it in Cincinnati, Ohio and that means a McDonalds every twenty miles and cell phone service uninterrupted for thousands of miles.  But they won’t get it with Agenda 21.  Instead, Agenda 21 and the United Nations architects wish to take from me these wonderful attributes of American culture and make Cincinnati more like Cancun and Rio.  The end game of Agenda 21 that is intended to take place over many generations is to destroy the infrastructure of suburbia and force residents back into the cities.   The sinister aims at work are not ones of direct power from people like George Soros in his generation, but the larger aim of surrender to global collectivism where the human body is but a cell in the body of the Earth, which is considered the highest form of existence.

In my community of Liberty Twp one of my favorite Trustees David Kern finds himself voting in favor of a massive apartment complex at the new Carriage Hill development because members of the Vision Committee years ago approved the development.  Developers are happy to make money off the Vision Committee’s idea, but what nobody knows is that the Vision Committee created their land use plan with a commitment to Agenda 21.  Since most people think only in terms of their generation and not the collective salvation of collectivists who attend the Earth Summit in Rio, they don’t know that the intent behind the luxury apartments at Carriage Hill are to be Section 8 housing 50 years from now, and as taxes push people out of their homes in the suburbs they will retreat to those Section 8 homes as they lose their homes.  Once they get used to that style of living they will crave the same kind of home centralized in Cincinnati near public transportation like what the Street Car is offering.  When Mayor Mallory used the Delphi Technique mentioned in the video above, to achieve passage of the Street Car even with all the opposition, it wasn’t because Mallory wanted to build a legacy for himself; it is because of his collective commitment to Agenda 21.  Fifty years from now when all the United Nations plans for the Twenty First Century are put in place, the suburbs of America will look like the green space outside of Cancun and all the residents will be stacked like insects in the apartment slums of Cincinnati not out of convenience to make life for the human being a good one, but out of a sacrifice to preserve Mother Earth.  When Liberty Township Zoning Administrator Jon West says to my good friend Cathy Dirr who is the loudest voice in Southern Ohio against Agenda 21 that “you can’t stop progress, Cathy,” he is saying that the progress of Agenda 21 and its commitment to Mother Earth is more important than the happiness and sovereignty of the individual citizens of Liberty Township.  By the time those new apartments being built at Carriage Hill–the Homearoma community in 2013–becomes Section 8 housing in 2040 the developers will long be dead and their children will have squandered all the money they made on the present real estate deals.  But Agenda 21 will just be kicking in and those same children will be pushed out of the suburbs and back into the city where the prying eyes of government can control and regulate their lives with the kind of imprisonment that one can see in present day Cancun.

In Cancun nobody is rich, but the organized crime organizations who own everything.  The same with Rio de Janeiro, but Hollywood has taken part in selling the Agenda 21 dream to the world with films like Blame it on Rio and the Mickey Roark film Wild Orchid.  To the soundtrack of Ofra Haza’s sexy Egyptian music, the sex in Rio during Wild Orchid was the fantasy of most men and women and the result has been a massive influx of spring breakers who have fled the control of their liberal college institutions in America for destinations abroad where commitment to Mother Earth takes priority over human lifetimes and morality.  Thousands of young people fill the hotels of Rio and Cancun as they have become the premier spring break destinations where they indulge in the loose rules of sexual conduct and make fools of themselves forever drowning their morality on the beaches of those resort cities.   As adults they will remember their shame and pour their redemption into collective salvation by sacrificing their lives for Mother Earth.  The plan of Agenda 21 is there in the financing of those particular films most recently exhibited in the Fast and Furious film titled the Fast Five, which featured street racing in Rio.

The pattern and commitment to Agenda 21 can best be seen in the 1973 film Soylent Green.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green  The investment of the culture into youth can be tragically seen and the result for the elderly who are killed and eaten by the youth once the reach the decided upon age for death is the end game for Agenda 21.  It may not be the intention during the Earth Summits, but it will be the result.  After all, that is what Soylent Green is, the chopped up bodies of the dead elderly of society who are fed to the youth as a sacrifice similar to the commitment of all collectivists into the surrendering of their lives to the benefit of Mother Earth.  Agenda 21 is so embedded in our culture that conservative trustees and country commissioners have been voting in favor of its implementation for decades without even knowing it.  Agenda 21 was there in the movie Soylent Green, it was there in Blame it on Rio, Wild Orchid, and The Fast Five.  It was there when travel agencies created the incentives to lure young people from American colleges to spend spring break in Cancun to have crazy sex on the beaches like they saw in movies under the watchful eyes of Mexicans with machine guns patrolling the beaches at night and watching in delight.  The bulge in their pants is not from the clips of .223 ammunition designated for their machine guns.

Part of the Agenda 21 strategy is to get people to finance their own demise.  Uncontrollable development will make a few developers wealthy such as in the Liberty Twp case of the Carriage Hill Apartments, but everyone else will suffer.  But in the far away land of Rio and Cancun the plans were created long ago to use the greed and short-sightedness of the average American to drive them like cattle to the slaughter-house of their own culture.  The end game is the city of Cancun and Rio where the tinsel looks impressive right off the airplane quickly degrades just under the blankets of society’s view.  While dining in an upscale Mexican restaurant in Cancun my wife and I spoke a bit with our waiter, a nice Mexican man who said yes senior and yes senorita at the end of every sentence in his dialogue with us.  At first site we thought he was just like us, that he lived in a decent home, had a decent family, had a decent car to drive—access to iPods and Xbox games and watched football on Sunday afternoons in the autumn.  But as we spoke to the man deeply, more than he was used to, he revealed after fifteen minutes of conversation that his brother had been recently killed by gang violence in the living quarters outside the tourist district.  He lived in a card board box.  His wife worked at the Sex Mall outside the airport and his children had all disappeared.  The epic peril of his story immediately alarmed us that he was using a typical tourist scam on us hoping for a good tip, but his body language and demeanor was one of honesty.  He was barely hanging onto life, and had little incentive to proceed from one day to the next.  Looking at him I thought of the movie Soylent Green where the elderly actually looked forward to their death because the toil of their lives would soon be over with pleasant music and comfortable settings not experienced in their day-to-day living.  In that man’s face I saw the result of Agenda 21 and the future of not only Cincinnati but every city in America.  If Agenda 21 is left unchecked the future of all our children can be seen in the lives of the current residents of Rio and Cancun.  The plans made by The United Nations are made in those cities for the results of the current inhabitants, and the results are not good for the human race.

Without question zoning administrators like Jon West in Liberty Twp will roll their eyes at the presentation shown above by Bob Silliman and regard them as the frightened antics of an elderly man.  Community administrators like West are so entrenched through the Delphi Technique to the practices of Agenda 21 that they are not able to see the big picture beyond the advancement of their own careers—and that is part of the United Nations strategy that is discussed at Earth Summits every year since 1992.  They count on human beings to be too short-sighted to see the whole picture, and in America people like Bob Silliman who are elderly and no longer concerned for their social advancement can finally see these schemes for what they are.  There is a clarity in old age that people like Bob Silliman have that people like Jon West do not yet possess—and the truth is in the words expressed in Silliman’s presentation.  Agenda 21 is a sinister aim for the human race, and wishes to end the American way of life.  The situation is made even worse when it is realized that The United Nations uses American tax dollars to fund its own existence which is the joke at all these events in Rio and Cancun.  Americans are funding their own end, and members of The United Nations are laughing about it as they gaze at the bronze bodies of topless women and string bikinis while sipping on their margaritas thinking of themselves as masters of the universe.  They might even think that their sacrifice of the human race to the goddess Mother Earth be equivalent to the Mayan who sacrificed many human beings to the god Kukulcan which is the name of the main road that runs the strip of Cancun.  The mind of these social collectivists and parasites to the human soul has the end game of the movie Soylent Green where future human beings will beg to be killed so their misery ends and they can become the food that feeds the human race and bring real value to their lives at last, as they spent a life time locked in an apartment living miserable lives of labor because of Agenda 21.

For a local example of organizations that most advance Agenda 21 in the Cincinnati area here is one:

http://www.citizensforcivicrenewal.org/index.html

They are the same group involved with the Street Car issue of Cincinnati and was hired by Lakota Schools to operate their “community conversations” which have not been cheap.  They specialize in The Delphi Technique which anyone who has attended the meetings with Jeffery Stec at Citizens for Civic Renewal has learned.  CLICK HERE to learn about The Delphi Technique and how it works.  It is the same technique mentioned in the video of Bob Silliman.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

The Tea Party is America’s Only Hope: A look into the future of politics

The political entities who claim that the Tea Party is a radical organization of dangerous individuals are speaking relative to their far left positions, and that includes people like Karl Rove—political strategist for the Republican Party.  In a very clarifying example shown below by Glenn Beck and Judge Napolitano it is displayed why Republicans and Democrats are emerging into a single party that we might at this time call “Republicrats” which is a combination of raw communism, progressivism, and soft socialism following the Overton Window of gradual progression toward big government.   To them, the position of the Tea Party does seem radical as it is their desire in both parties to move further and further toward big government until all personal freedoms are completely lost.  The video below should be watched in its entirety, because it is filled with information that is very useful in explaining the direction of politics today.  I personally consider Judge Napolitano to be one of the greatest human scholars of Constitutional understanding alive in America with the exception of Supreme Court Judge Scalia.  Scalia, Napolitano and other members of true American conservatives represent my beliefs and the thoughts of most Americans.  It is the big government radicals on the far left relative to the Tea Party position who consider such conservativism as radical.  It is they who have attempted to move millions of Americans toward an unmanaged government utopia with an end game of far left control.   It is people like Karl Rove who have split the Republican party by strategically taking the party toward the misfits of socialism instead of the direction of American liberty and it is not the task of Americans to buy into the collectivism of party rule—but rather to reject it in favor of Constitutional logic and freedom loving scholarship that paves the way toward self-initiated prosperity.  Watch the clip below carefully and take notes.  This one is very, very important.  The fate of America and each of our lives is described within it.

The failure of Republicans to unseat President Obama can be said to have rested upon the power of collectivism.  Democrats have long ago surrendered self-initiation and are happy to function as a blob of collectivism, so they do not have a philosophical struggle within their party.  They are all to some degree or another socialists.  Some Republicans have taken notice and have allowed themselves to be pulled in that direction for many years.  They have been weak in their convictions and have lost consistently to the radicals on the left.  The best and most recent example is that Mitt Romney felt he had to defend his wealth and success in his run for president, and the campaign became entirely about the bourgeois class against the proletariat which is a communist strategy from the far left.  Some conservatives like Rove, Governor Kasich, and Speaker Boehner have decided that they need to move from their conservative positions to meet the liberals halfway, but often get scammed when liberal politicians refuse to meet them at all creating a situation where the conservatives move to the left, but the left stays where they were.  Once the conservative is with the liberal, the liberal then moves further to the left, which is what has been happening during the Obama Presidency.  Karl Rove is urging conservatives to rally behind the party so they can defeat the mass of liberal collectivism aligned behind politicians like Obama, and the Clintons behaving like insects in an insect colony rallying to the urgings of the queen.  But reaction and compromise is the worse thing that can happen, because it is the strategy of far left radicals to propagate their scam using the Overton Window to continue a collective march to the left.  Rove says, “If you can’t beat them, join them.”  That is where the Tea Party has emerged to fill the void and provide representation to those not represented by the two-party system which is in essence just one leftist leaning party all dancing to the same music.

The successful formula for America is in The Constitution.  It has worked in the past and it can work again, because it was formed by people with a deep philosophical understanding of life and politics that transcends historic barriers or limitations.  The Constitution has most come under attack as Judge Napolitano pointed out in the video above during the Presidency of both Roosevelt’s and Woodrow Wilson.  The deal at the time was a basic disagreement over the style of collectivism that would be imposed on society.  Teddy Roosevelt deeply in love with European hierarchies openly began the process of bypassing The Constitution that is seen to this day by virtually every President which has gradually moved America further to the left as seen in the chart Glenn Beck displayed.  It is not the problem of me, or you dear reader that politicians like Roosevelt, Wilson, and Johnston imposed their personal views—and personal failings into politics and attempted to suppress The Constitution with their own princely influences.  It is not our job as a collective society to cover their follies with more mistakes.  It is our job and duty to return the country back toward the Constitution.

As Judge Napolitano stated, that process will be painful.  It is hoped that perhaps time will merge the two current parties together into some form or Republicrat and that people in the Tea Party will be represented by some sort of Freedom Party that is more representative of the original Anti-Federalists.  In the mean time America may become a three-party system as strategist have abandoned conservativism in favor of short term political victories.  But things will not continue to proceed to the political left without conflict.  I’m not going in that direction, and the people I know in the Tea Party aren’t going either.  It is not my job to follow Boehner or Kasich in a march to maintain party rule, it is the job of the Tea Party to return the nation to Constitutional principles and to chastise those who abandon it in favor of financial security under the covers of collectivism.  Napolitano also discussed the unfortunate end game if the political process fails, and that is that we have an obligation to return the nation back to The Constitution away from the hands of Obama, Kasich, and Boehner with force if needed, which is why we must have the Second Amendment.  That is not a negotiable Amendment, and history proves that politicians cannot be trusted with power.  So guns will always be needed.

In short, the Tea Party exists not as a radical organization hell-bent on old-fashioned ideas, but as a defender of The Constitution where the present political system has failed—immensely.  It is not the collective obligation of American citizens to continue to cover up the false interpretations and radicalism of European loving monarchs who would crown themselves king of America—if allowed.  They are not allowed, and presidents, speakers of the house, governors, congressman, senators, trustees, commissioners are all servants of the people—servants of the republic of America.  If they insist on anything else, they are wrong and it is the obligation of Constitutional protectors like the Tea Party to reset the correct political course through debate or conflict in the unbiased pursuit of justice.  The movement to the political left by both parties can no longer be advanced through name calling and extortion.  It is time to stop that progressive erosion of American value with a firm dedication to Constitutional adherence and not the loose interpretation of radicals who would seek to end The United States through the Overton Window.  CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE.

Click the link below to see how George Washington viewed government, which is what the Tea Party wishes to bring about again.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/18/its-george-washingtons-281st-birthday-here-are-his-5-most-important-warnings-to-congress/

Only an idiot would call the logic of Washington’s arguments “radical.”

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

The Scum Bags of Washington: Why so many politicians become “rich” in office

I am not a fan of Elizabeth Warren, and I fully support profitable endeavors, but I do not like it when politicians rally against the evils of Wall Street while they take bribes on K-Street. In my opinion the K-Street bribes are a far greater problem.  But I will give credit where credit is due, Warren asked recently the hard question as to why there has not been justice done on behalf of government when crimes are known to be openly committed, particularly in the financial sector.  When people are openly robbed by greedy crony capitalism, who is looking out for the victims?  Warren at least addressed the issue which Darryl Parks covered during his Saturday show on 700 WLW.  Darryl for a number of years has been asking how can congressman and senators who make a yearly salary of just over six figures become millionaires within a few years of taking office?  The answer is in corruption deals where they all put their hand in the bucket and take out as much money as they want—which is the standard practice in modern politics.    Have a listen, it’s well worth your time:

Warren obviously as a progressive does not like Wall Street or oil companies, so she will have a tendency to put them in the spotlight whenever possible to make her point—but in this case she was right.   I’m sure Warren has nothing to say about the recent Facebook announcement of paying zero taxes on over a billion dollars made during 2012.  She is picking winners and losers in business as notoriously as any politician, so she is no saint by any measure.  But as a new senator she knows that there are crooked deals, and she made a point to expose one in her opening days of office—which as Darryl pointed out, Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid will surely quickly get under control.  The other senators on Capitol Hill will not let Warren expose their easy cash gravy trains for long, so enjoy the bursts of honesty while it lasts.

If anyone thinks that Jessie Jackson Jr. is alone in his fall from grace, guess again.  Jackson is only the latest to get caught dipping is hand into campaign donations to buy Rolex watches and other tid-bits of pleasure while working in government.  Politicians who would otherwise be unsuccessful in business find they can become respected in public office, but they lack the mental aptitude to resist temptation making them for the most part scandalous bands of thieves always looking to partner up with a financial pirate or public con artist.  The Jackson case is fresh from the press and shows to what extent the trouble in government runs.  I would say that Jessie Jackson’s tendency to throw his wife under the bus in his plea deal to get reduced jail time says everything about the quality of person Jackson is and all politicians in general.  Read more about his case at the link below:

http://sandrarose.com/2013/02/jesse-jackson-jr-s-plea-deal-incriminates-his-wife/

The trouble with politicians is that they represent the low quality constituents that America has become.  Just the other day as I was listening to Bill Cunningham on the radio, he was rather animated over John Boehner’s long time position against earmarks in congressional bills.  Cunningham on the air stated that his golf buddy John should drop a few billion dollars worth of earmarks into some bill to pay for the new bridge that needs to replace the Brent Spence connecting I-75 in Cincinnati and Covington, Kentucky.  “Nobody would notice,” Cunningham said.  “Everyone else does it, so why doesn’t Boehner?”  That statement ladies and gentlemen is why we have so many scum bags in politics.  The more money that is thrown into the public treasury, there are far too many hands who wish to take it and use it for some pet project to satisfy the whims of any of the multiple lobbyists on K-Street.  Wall Street to hedge their bets and keep government looters out of their pockets is happy to include politicians in their scams to keep the law off their back.  Politicians like Jackson can’t resist the call of easy money, so they start taking it and buy themselves expensive watches, and real estate investments off money that isn’t technically theirs.  Boehner is a Washington insider who considers himself an honest politician compared to the rest because he has a long-term policy against putting earmarks in congressional bills, but at the same time his golf buddies who claim to be conservative hawks want him to take money out of the treasury to pay for pet projects in the Speaker’s district—which is just as corrupt as when some politician on the other side of the country does it.

The trouble is in the lack of personal responsibility, the disconnect between the value of money and the value of the people stealing it.  When people of little personal value have their hands on money of great value, the attraction is unfathomable.  When Jessie Jackson Jr. took money to buy lavish gifts for himself, he did it to fill a void in himself that lacks personal character.  When Bill Cunningham urges John Boehner to install earmarks in some meaningless congressional bill to raise the billions of dollars for a new bridge, he is making such statements from a lack of personal value.  The money is there to be taken, so somebody should take it and use it on something needed.  When Elizabeth Warren asks why there is a cozy relationship between Wall Street and politicians on Capitol Hill, she is really positioning herself for a candidacy in 2016 for President.  She doesn’t care about the corruption really, but rather sticking to the progressive party talking points that wants to destroy Wall Street while making waves that place her on the national scene.  Politics is all screwed up and is run by thieves and con artists because the values of our society are so bad that nobody sees such things as wrong any more.  Nobody wishes to uphold a moral order, so there is no consequence for actions.  That is unless, as in the case of Jessie Jackson Jr., he understates his income on his tax returns.  Then, justice is swift and true. Government must have its money to pay for all the bandits that hold office there, and wish to make sweet-heart deals with scum bags on K-Street.  When taxes aren’t paid, even Al Capone was sent to jail—because government is not about caring for people in a republic.  It’s about making politicians rich off the backs of extortion and shell games of injustice that makes Las Vegas look like a church on a Sunday morning.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Facebook Pays Zero Taxes: Where are Obama’s cries for fairness???????????????????

Considering that I spent a good part of last weekend preparing DVD copies of my videos to prove a tax filing status to satisfy the IRS, the news that Facebook isn’t paying any Federal taxes caught my attention.   Facebook (spelled with a little “f” to prove they don’t take themselves too seriously—which is the cool thing to do these days—won’t pay a penny in Federal income tax.  Rather, they are getting money back after making over a billion dollars in profits.  Shhhhhhhh, do you hear that……………………………..keep listening……………………….if you pay attention you will not hear a damn thing from the Obama White House when a huge financial contributor to his progressive causes dodges payment of their “fair share” in social obligations.  More on the story is at the link below.

http://www.inquisitr.com/527467/facebook-accused-of-tax-evasion/

Now, I don’t begrudge Facebook the ability to make money, or file their taxes in creative ways to avoid getting pillaged over tax obligations.  Taxes are legalized theft of property owner resources by a mob like government, so I applaud at every opportunity free enterprise and bold innovation to avoid the money collecting trolls calling themselves IRS agents.  The trouble is, if the company getting caught doing such a thing were a company associated with the Republican Party, the Tea Party, or individuals who typically cause the IRS trouble, that harassment for not paying a mythical “fair share” would be aggressive.  It has long been stated by people like me that the IRS (Internal Revenue Service=Tax Collectors) is not about fairness, it’s about control and is the oldest game in the book of manipulation from one entity over another.

I would point you dear reader to a story I wrote here some time ago about my friend Justine Thomas who ran into trouble with the IRS because of his scandalous activity of fighting for smaller government through a Cincinnati 9/12 group.  The IRS even went so far to track down a Tea Party group affiliated remotely with Thomas to find out if there was any taxes they should be paying based on their tax filings and revenue collected.  The IRS all in the name of justice and “fairness” showed they would steamroll over anyone to see that the mean, evil suburbanites connected to Thomas pay their fair share so that welfare recipients in poor communities could still get their Obama phones.

But remember the constant utterances from the political left all during the Presidential election about Mitt Romney only paying 14% of his many, many millions to the IRS and the accusation that he was a bad, greedy man because he didn’t want to pay his fair share to the government.  Even President Obama himself poked fun at Romney for hiding money in the Cayman Islands and attempting to shield his wealth from the grubby hand of progressive looters.  Romney paid more in taxes last year than the $1 billion dollar profit generating free website Facebook.  In fact, 49% of us did.  Anyone who pays Federal taxes—which is just under half the nation–paid more in taxes than Facebook, but why.

Dear reader, if you want to be treated with the same respect that Facebook has, and not have IRS agents show up at your house asking for DVDs to justify tax status, or grill over all your financial records to prove that you are telling the truth, all you have to do is give a few million dollars to the organized crime syndicate called the Democratic Party and all will be forgiven.  The hidden story behind Facebook is that if you pay the troll, the troll won’t come and eat you and your family.  But if you try not to pay, then every law written in the IRS books will be brought to justice against any who dare question their authority, or avoid paying them the money they believe they have coming to them just for being born.

The hypocrisy is obvious.  Not a peep came out of President Obama on the campaign trail following his State of the Union speech about how Facebook was evil in trying to avoid paying taxes.  Not a word was said that executives at Facebook didn’t feel an ounce of guilt as they took their bonus checks and went on lavish vacations and rolled in the massive profits they generated by selling collected data to third party interests—(cough)…….like the government.  After all, who pays Facebook a billion dollars?  To learn how Facebook makes money, click the link below.

http://www.empowernetwork.com/empowermlm/blog/how-does-facebook-make-money-the-answer-is-simple/

Once again the real nature of government business is easy to see and right out in the open for anyone with the guts to look.  Obama has said nothing about the tax evasion of yet another one of his financial contributors and this flies in the face of progressive theory in ways liberals on the political left chose to ignore.  Their idea of a utopian society forcefully provided through violence, extortion and massive wealth redistribution will never work because in the end, they are as greedy as the most corrupt oil company, the most openly capitalistic, profit generating Midwestern business.  Obama doesn’t say anything because he wants easy access to Mark Zuckerberg and the young voters who think that Facebook is cool, and hip.   Obama also needed the campaign donations from people like Zuckerberg to keep him in power over Republican rivals so turning a blind eye to tax evasion on behalf of Facebook is to his benefit.

The IRS is not about justice, it’s about protection money.  If you are on the wrong side of the current President, the law will be used to hunt you down to prove your innocence–no stone will be left unturned.  If you do not pay your protection money to the government through campaign donations, you will be publicly ridiculed, and perhaps even thrown in jail for not paying your taxes.  But if you are a huge company that puts money in the mobster’s pockets indirectly, you can go free and even profit more because they will help you become more profitable with public endorsements and official cabinet seats within the administration.  If President Obama really cared about the poor, the down-trodden, the debt ridden malcontent who’s been unemployed for over a year, he’d publicly call out Facebook for dodging their taxes the same way he accused Mitt Romney of doing during the last presidential campaign.  But instead, Obama updated his Facebook status and bragged to his daughters that he knows the CEO of Facebook personally, and hopes that it makes him a better dad in the eyes of innocence that are blind to the dirty tricks and scandals that go on behind the cubicles of the IRS.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Rich Hoffman Loves Education: Thomas Jefferson did not have sex with Sally Hemings

Contrary to what many think I do not hate education.  In truth I doubt you know dear reader any ten adults combined who works as hard as I do every day to learn something new.  The people I look up to and admire are not movie actors, sports figures and celebrities, but rather scientists like Leonardo da Vinci, and Founding Fathers like Thomas Jefferson.  I admire personalities who continue to grow and learn their entire lives and dedicate their very souls to goodness, and perpetual knowledge.  I find anything less to be disgusting honestly, and I have no pity for less.  In that regard I felt it necessary to provide some context about some of the many bits of mail that I received after my article on the new superintendent Keith Kline who moved from Lakota to West Clermont recently.  The collection of nay-sayers in the wake of that article (CLICK HERE FOR REVIEW) collectively assumed that I had no right to say anything about Kline’s movement from one job to another—that it wasn’t any of my business—“that everything that happens in public education doesn’t have to be approved by Rich Hoffman.” Well……………….I beg to differ.  Before I explain why, please do refer to the below article link about the Franklin superintendent who recently rallied against several schools including one where my friend Kelly Kohls happens to be president of the school board in Springboro.  Apparently Arnol Elam was playing Angry Birds on his phone during Kasich’s recent budget proposal because money is not being taken from the poor districts and given to the rich as Elam suggested in a letter he sent to parents urging them to remove Kasich and other legislators who supported the new budget.  Elam should have been paying attention because in fact the opposite is true, much to my displeasure.  (CLICK HERE TO HEAR THE GOVERNOR HIMSELF talk about his budget)  Kelly Kohls and her Springboro school board have done a good job of managing their district without tax increases and is one of the examples that Kasich has been looking at for how all public schools should be run. (CLICK HERE TO SEE KELLY AND I SPEAK AT AN EDUCATION EVENT.  But Elam has other motives.  He doesn’t like Kelly Kohls because of her open campaigning for Senate Bill 5 a few years ago, and he doesn’t like the conservative governor.  He represents the typical labor union radical that is in public education these days, and it is people like him that have brought me to my conclusions about public education.

http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/news/franklin-schools-under-investigation/nWPmZ/

Below is a clip of what Kelly has been able to do as President of Springboro schools.

If public education were about actually teaching children, I would be all for it.  If little boys wanted to grow up to become Thomas Jefferson and little girls Annie Oakley or Amelia Earhart I would support public education in less than one second.  Instead, public education inspires young people to be more like Kim Kardashian and Honey Boo Boo.  When I speak against public education and college it is not because I don’t love learning.  It is because those institutions are reeking with liberalism and are teaching our youth everything wrong.  They are filled with teaching positions held by liberals scared of the real world and in no position to teach the youth of American anything!  The evidence of this liberal presence in all tax payer funded schools is overwhelming, and is vastly ignored by the adult population because the knowledge is inconvenient.  Parents fear losing their day time babysitting service, which is all public education really amounts to these days—which is quite tragic.

Many people today would be shocked to learn that in the year 1636 Harvard was founded by Congregationalists to train for ministers.  Yale in 1701 and Dartmouth in 1769 were founded with the same intention.  The College of William and Mary was founded to train Anglican ministers.  In fact many of the early education institutions in America particularly those guided by minds like Thomas Jefferson who founded The University of Virginia as a multi denominational school committed to higher learning, emphasized critical thinking, and a yearning for philosophy in their studies.  Education in the early days of America was committed to more than just landing a good job with a high salary.  The students were encouraged by their teachers to be good people, and to operate under moral conviction.  Education in America during the time of the Founding Fathers intended to elevate the soul of the students through education not to reprogram them into some small-minded perpetrator of liberalism.

It is educators like Arnol Elam who have yelled to the world that good men like Founding Father Thomas Jefferson should be discredited by an affair with his 15-year-old slave Sally Hemmings—because the tenants of progressive philosophy must tear down Jefferson and those like him so that history will not measure progressivism against the philosophy of Scottish Common Sense, that are most guilty of destroying our society with moral depravity and watered down educations.  But guess what?  I measure Progressivism against the philosophy of Scottish Common Sense that founded American very unfavorably, so unfavorably that I reject modern education because of it.

The Scottish School of Common Sense was a school of philosophy that flourished in Scotland in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Its roots can be found in responses to the writings of such philosophers as John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, where its most prominent members were, among others, Dugald Stewart, Thomas Reid andWilliam Hamilton, who combined Reid’s approach with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. The peculiar influence it had on philosophers elsewhere in Europe, not to mention in the United States, exemplified by the American pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce, is of a considerable magnitude.

One central concern of the school was to defend “common sense” against philosophical paradox and scepticism. It argued that common-sense beliefs govern the lives and thoughts even of those who avow non-commonsensical beliefs and that matters of common sense are within “the reach of common understanding”.[citation needed] The qualities of its works were not generally consistent; Edward S. Reed writes, e.g., “[Whereas] Thomas Reid wished to use common sense to develop philosophical wisdom, much of this school simply wanted to use common sense to attack any form of intellectual change.”[2] 

In regard to the affair of Jefferson and Hemings it is highly unlikely that Jefferson even had intercourse with another woman after his wife died, let alone had an affair with Hemings.  It was largely because of Jefferson that slavery began to be examined as immoral in The United States, steps that Lincoln would later utilize to abolish the practice for the first time in human history.  And Jefferson was NOT having sex with underage girls as progressive modern educators hell-bent on embracing human weakness wish to slander and propagate to further their agenda of social destruction.  Jefferson it would appear—especially once he was over forty, was far more concerned with reading, writing, and scientific thought than plotting ways he could have sex with a woman for a mere two hours of pleasure.  Only an immoral progressive educator would think such a thing—who has nothing going on in their minds or private lives to indicate to them that people think any different from them.

Imagine the typical modern-day school superintendent who has a doctoral degree in education—in liberal studies, in progressive social advancement–that is committed to attacking America’s version of Scottish Common Sense, who don’t even have understanding enough to see that Kasich wasn’t stealing money from the poor to give to rich schools, but that it is the other way around.  Modern education is not about teaching children big ideas about science, philosophy, or even spiritual awareness.  It’s about creating good jobs for progressive minded human beings who seek to impose their small-minded world view onto all tax payers with the blanket assumption that education is universally good—when in fact it only advances thoughts favoring liberalism and rejects common sense entirely.  The product of modern education is bad.  It creates bad, immoral characters, and it is responsible for much of the misery that can be seen around the world to this very day.  It is truly sad that dusty old relics such as the Founding Fathers of The United States were far more intellectually sound with all the limits of their day than the modern educator with far more tools at their disposal—but it’s true.  Educators like Arnol Elam see only one thing—money and progressive causes in the daily conduct of their lives and they disgust me.  I despise having to contribute money to such people with my tax dollars.  I hate that a small portion of my money goes to the salary of Arnol Elam to propagate such disgusting verbiage to his school district that young people will learn and carry into their adulthoods.

There isn’t much in this world that I love more than books.  I read every single day of my life, and most days I read for many hours.  I understand people like Thomas Jefferson, and yearn to see his kind of America.  I do not want to understand people like Arnol Elam.  Educators like that are small people with small minds and they are teaching young people to be small adults—and that absolutely disgusts me.  It is not the job of the American tax payer to throw more money at education so that people like Arnol Elam can have a good job on the public dime.  The job of education is to teach young people how to be successful adults, and that job is not being done.  So in that respect I see every public education issue as my problem because my money is being used to advance it.  If I’m going to pay for public education I’m going to get a return on my investment.  If public education takes my money, they will get my criticism especially when they fail to do the job as I think the job should be done.  My measure for good education is people like Thomas Jefferson who placed education on the highest level of human thought and spent his life learning every day and wanted to share that love of learning with all American citizens.  I do the same, and understand that.  But advocates of a faulty product such as modern education like what Arnol Elam represents are parasites to common sense; they seek to advance the basic tenants of Immanuel Kant and the European Enlightenment.  Jefferson spoke of that same European Enlightenment by saying “the comparisons of our governments with those of Europe are like a comparison of heaven and hell.”  And so too is my idea of education compared to Arnol Elam, it is for this reason that I reject modern education in public and college models.  I see them as lost ships guided far out to sea under the idiocy of modern progressives who built their philosophies off Kant and the European Enlightenment monstrosities.    Such things may sound like disconnected rubbish when attached to superintendents like Arnol Elam, but the roots of progressivism are in his concerns, his political actions to move the city of Franklin to political action against a governor in Kasich that is trying to reform education spending.   Districts being run by my friend Kelly Kohls are cast in a bad light by people like Arnol Elam because it is Springboro that is trying to emerge from the darkness of liberalism that has so infected every single education institution in America, breaking the universal commitment to collectivism which so terrifies progressives.   As a conservative, anti-Federalist, Tea Party loving American, the liberalism being taught in public education is unacceptable and I’m not happy with it.  If I had a choice, I wouldn’t spend one dime of my money on it.  Instead though, because of big mouth, greedy, small-minded educators like Arnol Elam who cries out for more money at every turn to fuel their progressive diatribes my money is taken from me and wasted on liberal institutions in the form of public education without my consent—and that is not acceptable.

So it is not true that I hate education just like it is not true that Thomas Jefferson had an affair with Sally Heming’s.  Both falsehoods have been spread by progressive enemies of Scottish Common Sense in order to advance modern progressive activism rooted in European Enlightenment.    I love education, but I reject the liberal institutions that currently possess those houses of learning.  Instead I advocate individual learning so to bypass the liberal control of the education process so that young minds can return their concerns to common sense and a life-long study of morality and goodness that they can carry not just into a job making them subjects to consumerism, but in every aspect of their lives from being good parents, to responsible voters, to committed community contributors, to thriving human beings.  If education is not concerned with these things, it is worthless.  The evidence to the state of modern education is in the words of Arnol Elam and his cries to steal more money from the rich to fuel his progressive school district toward the destruction of more youthful minds and their last hope for a clean and productive life.

Education is more than cheerleading, band, football practices, and art class.  Education is philosophy, critical thinking, and moral grounding along with igniting a life-long yearning for knowledge.  Education in the state that 2013 America holds is a deplorable excuse for human achievement that does little if anything to advance human progress.  Instead, it seems committed to carrying mankind backwards to the tribal villages of Africa or the human sacrificing city-state of the centrally planned communities of the Aztecs and Mayas.  I wouldn’t offer modern education to a dog I cared about, let alone a child I loved.  So it has no value to me as a viable tax expense and there are few politicians qualified to offer commentary on the subject when their primary concerns in life is the quality of their golf game instead of the quality of their life. Thomas Jefferson did not, and would not have an affair with Sally Heming’s or any other sexual representation of feminine magic.  Such a thought is hard for people who are still intellectually inept to grapple with, but sex is not the only concern for the human mind.  As anyone who has a love of learning can attest to, and has lived a full enough life to tell the difference, books and learning are far more rewarding than sex.  Thomas Jefferson in all probability spent the last 45 years or more of his life sexless completely because his mind was so active.   Modern educators who seek to teach young people about sex in the 4th grade can’t imagine such a person as Thomas Jefferson—and because they can’t are not qualified to teach anybody anything, let alone a child.   Thomas Jefferson to me represents how education should be in America and anything less than his approach is worthless and not worth any amount of money.  If the desire in public education were to carry every child into the life of such a classic founding father, I would support it unequivocally.  Instead, modern deconstructionist education seeks to tear Jefferson down, so that people like Arnol Elam can be seen by the public to be viewed as an equal measure of a man, instead of a money-grubbing thief with their gluttonous eyes on the public treasury.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

The Body Bags Behind the Clintons: Deaths and misery to launch a progressive president

A reader sent an email that reminded me of a book I read around 15 years ago called Blood Sport.  It was a book about the rise of Bill and Hillary Clinton to The White House and covered the numerous scandals surrounding the Clinton’s before Monica Lewinsky became a household name by conducting oral sex on the former President in The Oval Office.  Recently Hillary Clinton was named the most powerful woman in The United States which is a smack in the face among those who still feel outrage against the unsettled injustices of the Clinton’s past.  It should be remembered that the gangster Al Capone was also very popular with the public even though his rise to success was built on the backs of many, many body bags.  The truth is, people love power, and people love powerful people and in the case of the Clintons and the Capones of the world who have a tendency to leave many body bags in their climbs for power they both rose to power over many destroyed lives and tragic deaths.  Unfortunately for those who stand in their way, the deaths are quickly forgotten as the glory of power quickly eclipses injustice.  America in the case of Bill Clinton couldn’t even hold their attention span-long enough to focus on the importance of semen stains on Lewinsky’s blue dress, let alone contemplate the long list of deaths that followed the Clintons through out their political career.

The list of dead bodies shown below should send shivers down the spine of every American.  Bill and Hillary Clinton are modern-day celebrities and even if one might not want to think that they had anything to do with the murders of the people listed below, what is the coincidence that so many people would turn up dead who all knew the same people?  It defies logic, yet the Clintons have gotten away with………………well, look at the list below.  And in so doing they enjoy celebrity and fanfare beyond the wildest dreams of most anybody in the world.   That celebrity was built on the backs of the bodies below:

THE CLINTON BODY BAGS

1- James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash.  A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.  The rest of the people on the plane also died.  A few days later the air Traffic controller committed suicide.

5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund-raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992.  Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.

7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head.  Ruled a suicide.  Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House.  Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund-raising events.

8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock   Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton  He allegedly threatened to reveal this information.  After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide.  It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people who contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas

10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..

11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head.  It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere.  Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit  Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancée of Kathy Ferguson.  Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancée, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancée.

13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994.  His client was a convicted drug distributor.

14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case.  He died of three gunshot wounds.

15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General.  Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide.  Was pregnant at the time of her death.

16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992.  She died in a one car accident.

17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter.  Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority.  He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment.  Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp.  Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993.  He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer.  Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang.  Cause of death unknown.  Died November 29, 1996.  Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash.  Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.

24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop.  He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.

25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty.  His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.

26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.

27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case.  Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation.  A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks.  Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.


THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.

29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

3 2 – James Milan – Found decapitated.  However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.

33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths.  He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD:
36 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.

37 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds

38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley

39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel

40 – Major General William Robertson

41 – Col. William Densberger

42 – Col. Robert Kelly

43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes

44 – Steve Willis

45 – Robert Williams

46 – Conway LeBleu

47 – Todd McKeehan

To understand how so many deaths could happen around a group of central personalities, all one needs to do is study the life of Al Capone, or watch the movie by Clint Eastwood titled Absolute Power which appears to reflect the American temperament after the Clinton presidency which most people have long forgotten by now.  Such endeavors can only offer a speculative hint into the type of minds who could allow so much death to occur around them without any pursuit of justice.  Only the Clintons know for sure the real secrets behind these deaths and it is likely that they will go to their graves with the secrets.  Both Clintons have proven they have no difficulty lying to the public, so prosecution is pointless if the defendant has no fear of the afterlife and lying in the face of God.  If morality is not a value that people like Clinton adhere to, then justice can never be brought to them through fear of everlasting damnation.  For people who are willing to trade such thoughts for the immediacy of fame and fortune—there is no defense as the body bags lend credence to.

Mitt Romney in my opinion began to lose the 2012 Presidential election when he acknowledged Bill Clinton in a favorable way in a speech he gave on the campaign trail.  Conservatives have continued to lose ground to the immorality of progressives like Clinton because they lack conviction themselves.  When Clinton was being impeached by the House of Representatives near the end of his term in office, House Speaker Newt Gingrich was having sexual flings of his own, so weak politicians feared throwing stones in glass houses, and did not push the law when it came to Clinton.  The media had already shown a lack of will to bring justice for the names above—just as the media of Chicago was in love with Al Capone.   Americans love power, and they love mobsters for the power they wield and the death they can deal—because the ability to take a life is power.  When a politician is willing to take a life if political support does not shine favorably on them, then that is power in the eyes of the weak.  In the frame of reference of such a statement, it should come as no surprise that so many in the media support the Clintons and now the Obamas.  Progressives have shown a tendency to eradicate the lives of those who stand against their forms of collectivism, and that is power.  It is the willingness to take lives that make the perpetrators powerful and celebrities while those who play their cards correctly are always on the short end of the stick as they live within the rules.

The list above is long, and is proof that justice is not uniform across the society of America.  If a neighbor of mine were involved in only one of the deaths seen above, they would be prosecuted to life imprisonment.  But when you are a power-hungry politician who is in the business of writing laws, and enforcing the law from the highest offices in the land whether it is governor of a state or president of a country, there is no higher authority that can bring justice to an immoral character except God.  Yet if the immoral politician despises the concept of God itself as most Progressives do, then there is no penalty for lies, sexual deviation, and even murder—so why not use those acts of personal terror to advance their careers to the highest level.  Because it works, and in the case of Hillary Clinton with the trail of bodies behind her seen above with more to come that aren’t even on that list, she is preparing to run for President of the United States in 2016 and as of now is the most admired woman in America.  That reason alone is why our society is failing and cannot be helped.  It is for that reason that we have a 16 trillion-dollar deficit and a society of youth that is lost in space.  It is why fuel costs are nearly $4 per gallon and why thousands of young women are sold into modern human slavery through the sex trade to this very day.  It is why education is failing our children and why government employees have become the new pirates of terrorism through their labor unions.  America lacks the will to see justice.  They are instead enamored by the power of the murderer, of the fearless politician who will spit in the face of God with their hand on the Bible in front of the highest court in the land.  The families of the bodies above have long ago given up the hope for justice—instead they lock their doors and look over their shoulders because there is no law to protect them from such sinister enemies that they pay for with their hard-earned tax dollars.  The system itself believes itself to be bigger than any law, or any concept of good.  The system loves power, and that is why the Clintons are such modern-day celebrities—because they do not fear using their power in office to do whatever it takes to advance themselves to the next step—whatever that step may be.

The heart of the problem is America itself not the Clintons or the Obamas or the Al Capones.  If you dear reader think more of the exploits of Al Capone than Elliot Ness from the classic Untouchables story, then you are part of the problem.  If you like Tony Soprano over the goodness of Pa Ingalls from Little House on the Prairie, then YOU are part of the problem.  It is YOU who have made people like the Clintons celebrities when what they really deserve is the justice of a society’s wrath—which they know will never come.  Voters get the government that they deserve.

Click here to see who the new crime boss is in Chicago, and who influences most likely many of the progressive political scams that come to The United States through drug money daily. 

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Doc Thompson Gives Governor Cuomo Deserved Satire: The progressive, gun grabbing, snakes in the grass

If you haven’t heard Doc Thompson yet on The Blaze Radio Network in the mornings from 6 AM to 9 AM you are missing out.  No progressive politician is avoiding his scrupulous judgment and commentary.  This especially holds true of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo who was one of the first gun banning politicians to attempt to capitalize off the misery of the Sandy Hook shooting.  For those who don’t know who the governor of the most “progressive” state in The United States is, Andrew Mark Cuomo was born December 6, 1957) is the 56th Governor of New York. He previously served as the United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from 1997 to 2001, and as the Attorney General of New York from 2007 to 2010. He is a member of the Democratic Party, and the son of Mario Cuomo, the 52nd Governor of New York.  In the video below, Doc has some fun at the Governor’s expense—which is quite well deserved.

It is absolutely appalling how progressives hide like snakes in the grass and strike quickly when an opportunity presents itself on the backs of death and carnage.  Progressives like Cuomo wish for continuous expansion of government at the expense of freedom and they will stoop to no low too great to gain advancement of progressive politics.  Cuomo disgustingly used the shooting deaths at Sandy Hook Elementary to call out for the removal of guns from society working against The Bill of Rights in the American Constitution.  The gun ban in New York has nothing to do with preventative measures protecting children and everything to do with a long-term global plan to disarm every household in the entire world so that all those residences would be dependent on government to protect them.

Progressives are like abusive husbands who are so insecure about their manhood that they won’t let their wives leave their homes for fear that their spouses will find a better man at the grocery, the lingerie store, or even the gas station.  Progressives know that their ideas run against the natural tendency of the human being to pursue freedom so they can only gain compliance into their faulty philosophy by taking away the keys to the car, and making their spouses so dependent on them that it is fear that keeps them coming back to bed night after night, not loyalty or love.

Progressives want gun control for the same reason; they cannot allow private citizens to defend themselves from an imposing government.  Progressives require fear in order for anybody to buy into their form of leadership. Government schools use fear to pass school levies and increase taxes on private property.  Federal government uses race inequality fear to advance civil rights debates while the other hand racks up tremendous debt following the 45 Points of communism that reside behind the Democratic Party.  CLICK HERE TO SEE THIS LIST AND CONFIRM THE TRUTH.  And politicians like Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bloomberg in New York City seek gun control to keep citizens from being able to stick up for themselves against a reckless debt ridden government who requires 100% of society to participate in their massive scam against life itself.  Those politicians use fear to disarm the public in the same way that a robber tells their victims, “put your hands where we can see them, drop your weapons, and do what we say—and you can live.  Now—hand over your money.”

When Doc Thompson calls these politicians out the way he does, he does society a great service in pointing out the wrongs that progressives are attempting to conduct in a mass scale in a never-ending expansion of government driven by fear espoused by collectivist based personalities like Andrew Cuomo.  Gun control is just a way to disarm the public so that they cannot defend themselves in the future from the dictator tendencies of progressives.  It should not be forgotten that Mayor Bloomberg, Cuomo’s contemporary has put restrictions on soft drinks and other needless regulations that paints a clear picture of the kind of people progressives are.  They stand against freedom in every way such definitions can be termed, and they are a menace to the very lives of anybody who desires self-responsibility.

Progressives use fear to advance their agenda of control and manipulation over others.  They are like the jealous husband with a poor-self image of themselves—they are always afraid that the public will see something better and flee their control at the first sign, so the progressive seeks to take away all options so that society has no place else to turn.  When a man hides the car keys from his wife so that she doesn’t sneak out the back door with a fresh pair of panties looking for a lover who embraces her freedom, and doesn’t attempt to suppress it, the husband has caused the problem in the first place by injecting into the marriage mistrust that makes lovemaking in the bedroom impossible.  The progressive knows that their ideas are flawed, but like the husband they want to take away guns, soft drinks, and all social options so that society will stay loyal to them because no other options exist.  The actions of the progressive are abusive because it denies society of freedom the same as the jealous husband is bad for the confined wife who seeks a silent rebellion out of marital infidelity.  The tighter progressives squeeze society through restriction, the more society will want to buy guns, drink HUGE soft drinks, and rebel against that same well-intended government.  The husband rationalizes that he just wants to keep his marriage together by taking away all the options his wife has, and keeping her in the bedroom—his bedroom, is good for the marriage. But the husband is the cause of the wife wishing to flee because he does not have the self-esteem to be the better option. The progressives like Andrew Cuomo fear the same and cause the same but on a much bigger scale.  Just look at gun sales lately.  And when they impose their insecurities on society, they deserve to be made fun of by personalities like Doc Thompson who is simply pointing out the ludicrous nature of progressives and their massive cost to society not only fiscally, but emotionally.

Listen to Doc Thompson EVERY MORNING all across the nation.  Click here to find out how.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

“So God Made a Liberal”: Why Hollywood leans so far to the policital left

Paul Harvey’s old monologue title, “So God Made a Farmer” brought back to life through a Superbowl advertisement for Dodge Ram pick-up trucks had over 10 million hits on YouTube in less than 5 days, which is quite good.  CLICK HERE TO REVIEW the ad and my comments about it.  For a newer generation, it may well have been their first exposure to Paul Harvey, who for many years prior to the 1990’s was a respected figurehead on radio broadcasts all across the country.  Harvey represented the kind of America that I understand in the Midwest, the kind of America that has produced such Hollywood stars like Johnny Depp, George Clooney, Clark Gable, Annie Oakley, Tom Cruise, Steven Spielberg, Charlie Sheen, and many, many others.  Unfortunately, due to a take over of left leaning ideas Hollywood has forced all those Midwestern stars to suppress their conservative upbringings and embrace liberal causes, which many of them being actors find they can do easily.  CLICK HERE TO SEE WALT DISNEY’S WARNING in 1957 of liberalism in Hollywood.   Once liberals took over the Hollywood studio system which permeates every aspect of the entertainment culture from Las Vegas to Wilshire Blvd, anyone who wanted to be successful in Hollywood, had to learn to sell the benefits of liberalism to the rest of America.  This is why so many stars come out of the Midwest, because they went to Hollywood with a strong work ethic that they learned from Paul Harvey’s America, but they also had to adapt to the liberal views of the coastal states like New York and California who are committed to the causes of secular progressivism.  This mixed up relationship has given rise through Hollywood, commercials, and all forms of entertainment especially in music an off balanced commitment to liberalism.  Hollywood has created the modern liberal heard in the spoof below to Paul Harvey’s broadcast below, titled “So God Made a Liberal.”  Their reasons are rather sadistic and dangerous to all involved bleeding heart and conservative alike and filled with unintended consequences.

Just yesterday I received a very nice email from a person who has just finished my novel Tail of the Dragon saying that they couldn’t wait till it was made into a movie. I wrote back telling them thank you, but not to hold their breath because Hollywood right now would find that book reprehensible to their political beliefs because there is nothing in it that endorses liberalism.  I went on to say that only if filmmakers like Hal Needham, and Albert Ruddy were still allowed to make films in Hollywood would anything like Tail of the Dragon have a chance of being put to film.  The reason is that unlike the above stars who all came from the Cincinnati, Ohio area and ooze Midwestern charm on the silver screen which a majority of America can relate with, when offered a seat at the table in Hollywood a time or two myself well before I started the OW, my conservative viewpoints terrified the very souls of the liberals who control the industry.  I remember vividly a lunch meeting I had with two Hollywood producers at the Katsuya at Americana at the Brand, one of those meetings where they try to figure out if they can work with you politically.  I disqualified myself in about 7 minutes because I intentionally missed all the code words that I was supposed to adhere to regarding the acceptance of liberalism.  By the way, if you’re ever in Los Angeles and looking for a cool place to dine, I highly recommend Katsuya.  Check the link below for more.  It is my hope that the Liberty Way development in Liberty Twp is similar to this very good shopping complex that is just down the road in the same district where many of the television show exterior shots are conducted every day of every year.

http://www.americanaatbrand.com/glendale/dining/dining.php

I found that meeting bizarre.  I was being looked at because of my Midwestern upbringing, but at the same time I was expected to reject that upbringing to the greater cause of “collectivism, and secular progressive” commitment in the all-encompassing umbrella of liberalism.  I would not doubt that many of the actors above would have privately expressed views that reflect their Midwestern conservative upbringing, but in Hollywood, those views are expected to be shelved if that star expects to stay employed.  It all starts with a lunch meeting like the one at Katsuya but after 10 years of such political compromise, and many millions of dollars later, those same actors find themselves wearing t-shirts of Che in public because their groups of filmmaking friends think its funny—and cool.  I didn’t come close to passing the test and was politely driven back to the airport with smiles and handshakes by shoulders that became colder with each mile that LAX grew closer on the odometer.

I am not willing to trade my beliefs for millions of dollars, so it is unlikely that Tail of the Dragon will ever be made into a movie within the next 20 years, because of the Walt Disney warning.  So it should come as no surprise if I reveal here what I have revealed in private to very liberal-minded people in wonderful restaurants like Katsuya over some of the best sushi in The United States—that liberals are some of the most disgusting creatures ever to find the rays of sunlight shining upon their skin.  I have never cared for liberals even though they have a right to exist, as not all people must think alike.  But the trouble with liberals is that they require my money to live.  I on the other hand don’t require anything from liberals.  I don’t want their money, their services, their government, their collectivism—I want nothing from them.  I don’t even want the military that is offered by the Federal government.  For me, the Second Amendment and the other Bill of Rights is all I really want out of government.

Liberals have not been shy, especially in Hollywood of making fun of conservatives—like me—so it is only fair that they get it back in return, especially since conservatives pay for their existence with tax dollars.  Liberals in relation to the kind of people I know in the Midwest—in Paul Harvey’s America, are destructive enterprises of faulty minds.  They are parasites to everything that is good.  They represent virtually everything that is wrong with modern America and the spoof titled “So God Made a Liberal” is sadly all too accurate.  They are embarrassments to the human condition and destructive to every life they come in contact with.  It is amazing that these very same vermin lecture conservative America on righteousness, and justice.  Only such despicable human beings could claim that the same Republican Party that put an end to slavery is against Civil Rights.  Only a pathetic disregard for facts could ever give a liberal moral authority over the conservative and paint the later as evil, when it is actually the former.

Liberals are such terrible creatures that I would not even pretend to be one for all the money in the world—because such a world would lose all value and money would no longer mean anything.  After all, that is what the liberal does; it robs life of all value so that no thing or no person can be judged against those values.  This is why people become liberal, is because they fear judgment against values—because they assume they will come up short on that judgment.  So to protect themselves and their careers, it is safer to pick professions where the bosses also fear judgment—like what the film industry has become under the microscope of thousands of entertainment publications and critics in every newspaper.  Liberalism centered on no judgment is appealing to the weak and malicious because their acts of destruction can proceed without risk to their personal integrity, because integrity has been minimized by the concept of liberalism.

If God made a liberal on the 9th day as the video above suggests, he did it to bring Armageddon to the Earth and to create the End of Days.  A liberal does not bring productivity to a business or justice to the wronged—a liberal only creates chaos, menace, and terror by way of social values stripped away until they mean nothing.  As funny as the video might be in a metaphorical way, I cannot say that the humor is excessive by way of exaggeration, but funny because it’s true.  If Paul Harvey’s monologue expressed the values of the Midwest from years ago, this new rendition called “So God Made a Liberal” expresses the sad hopes of a couple of Hollywood producers in Katsuya who were more concerned about recruiting people to work with who shared their views of no value than a conservative voice that middle America is hungry to hear.  Or people raised in those sacred lands who quickly reject their values in trade for work like a common prostitute will declare their love for anyone who pays them the proper sum for their love-making.  The liberal is a degenerate species of human kind that produces only destruction and malice.  Liberals are good for only undoing the creations of the conservative, the representation of good, of justice, and of honor.

For me, I’ll stick with Paul Harvey and his vision of conservative America, because it is only there that growth for the human race can take place.  There is no dollar amount that could sway my opinion on the matter.  As I told the letter writer honoring my latest novel, yes, I think Tail of the Dragon would make a cool movie, but it’s unlikely for that to ever happen.   It’s not because the story is wrong for the silver screen, but rather because it does not fit within the confines of liberalism—which is quite intentional.  The story is about values and fighting to protect those values, and there is no writer in Hollywood who could remove that core tenet from the context without destroying what the novel is about.  Liberalism will stop at no limit to destroy a threat to its existence, and in the case of conservatives, it is more important to destroy or convert conservatives away from their Midwest roots so that liberals can monopolize bad behavior to the extent that they can then call them good—and people will finally believe it.  Liberals seek to turn conservatives into their kind with the same kind of domination that a pot-head drug user intends when they purchase a killer snake to display in their living rooms.  The pot-head wishes to show the world that they are in control of such a killer as they scoop up the big snake and put it in a glass display to be confined there so long as the pot-head feeds the snake rats and mice enough to stay fat, dumb, and happy.  So too has Hollywood done to the stars of the Midwest, fed them plenty till those free-thinking humans ate from liberal hands and proved to the world that the liberal can control the majesty of the conservative with the promise of easy food, and some damn good sushi at Katsuya.

Watch closely, and very carefully…………………………………………………………….God made a liberal so that people like the guy below wouldn’t have to feel guilty about all the bad decisions they made in their life…………………as a direct result of…………………….liberalism.  Which came first–the chicken or the egg………………the loser or the liberal?

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Lakota Schools Does NOT Need a School Levy in 2013: Meet the new Homearama Carriage Hill Development

Not all things at the Lakota School System have been bad.  I personally like the treasurer for Lakota, Jenni Logan.  She is very competent and is more than able to manage a multimillion dollar budget.  School board members Ben Dibble, Ray Murray, and Linda O’Conner I personally like, even though they are way to the political left of me.  I think they mean well.  And the current spokesman Randy Oppenheimer seems to be a pretty honest person with his heart in the right place.  Even though I think spokesmen for public education should be illegal, Randy is not bad at his job.  Recently in the Hamilton Journal Randy gave an honest assessment of Lakota’s financial situation that deserves recognition.  He stated along with reports from many other local schools regarding Governor Kasich’s new education budget that Lakota had been planning for a reduction in state funding so the news that cuts would not be forthcoming was seen as a budget surplus.  The quote from the paper can be seen below with a link to the article following.

“Lakota Local Schools — with enrollment around 16,625 — is set to receive $35.6 million in 2013; and would receive $4.1 million or 11.6 percent more the first year, and $849,318 or 2.1 percent the second year.  “We had projected a cut in funding, and the governor made his comments (last week) and indicated we couldn’t be cut,” said Lakota spokesman Randy Oppenheimer. “Any increase in funding is good news.”

http://www.journal-news.com/news/news/local/7-school-districts-may-receive-boost-in-state-fund/nWJdW/

That statement says that at least some of the management team at Lakota is crunching the numbers properly.  At this point I have my doubts but logic would dictate that Lakota shouldn’t ask for another school levy for more than a decade since their student enrollment is set to decline over that time span.  When Lakota was asking for school levies every 6 months a couple of years ago and we were fighting like cats and dogs Lakota had a student population of over 18,000.  By the time The United States elects another president Lakota’s enrollment should hover just over 10,000, and I would expect that the staff of over 2000 employees would have to be cut to reflect that loss in demand.  There may even be a combination of schools where some of the buildings will sit empty for lack of need.  This is good news for the tax payers of Lakota as they should be able to save millions upon millions in staff that costs a lot of money in salary and benefits.  If Lakota is smart, like some of the people who have emerged within the last couple of years have shown themselves to be, they wouldn’t ask for another levy till well after 2020.  Their tax base will stabilize, new businesses continue to move into the area which contributes money to that base consistently—which should flood the market with new money once the Liberty Way development takes off in 2014, and home sales from the Carriage Hill development where Homearoma is taking place in the summer of 2013 will contribute revenue per household well above the 250K per pupil tax base needed to maintain a funding model of 20 mills.  CLICK THE LINK BELOW TO LEARN MORE ABOUT CARRIAGE HILL.

http://www.carriagehillliving.com/homearama/

Those are all wonderful and exciting things.  Carriage Hill and the Liberty Way shopping complex will naturally expand the tax base while student enrollment will be declining rapidly bringing down the cost demands at the Lakota School System, if management does not give away the kitchen sink to the employees with excessively high labor contracts.  I would think that it would be worth a reasonable salary of between 50K per year to 60K per year for a 10 to 20 year veteran of education to teach at Lakota where the kids are nice, the parents care about their children, and the community is thriving versus going after 70K to 80K per year in salary teaching in a district like CPS which is a declining community because the taxes are too high and there are way too many parents on government assistance, which statistically leads to poverty and crime.

The people who aren’t happy at Lakota are those who push for more school levies that also happen to be real estate agents, people like Joan Powell who is the current president of the school board, and tax advocates like Pam Parrino who is also involved in real estate.  CLICK HERE to review when she threatened radio station WLW for giving me airtime to discuss school salaries hoping to discourage that kind of activity in the future—which obviously didn’t work.  When it became obvious to me that these types of people were using the Lakota School System to sell properties in their fields of endeavor by pushing for perpetual tax increases, exploding student enrollment by selling homes to families in the demographic age of 25 to 35 with 2.1 children per household, and covering the activity on the backs of children’s needs, the civil discussion we had been conducting erupted into an all out fight.  When the levy supports couldn’t win a tax increase from the public on the merit of argument they turned to more deceitful peer pressure and personal destruction.  I have never put up with that kind of thing, and I never will.  My current thoughts about those school levy advocates is that I don’t want 2/3 of my property tax bill to find its way into any of their pockets even indirectly.  And I will work my ass off to make sure that the more than 20,000 homes in Lakota who do not have children in the district learn of the motivations of those types of people because the only way to keep money safe is with a defeat at the ballot box.  I’ve seen enough evidence from the other political side to know that none of the levy support had one ounce of anything regarding the well-being of children.  It was for the well-being of the real estate agents who wanted an easy home sale and to make money off chaos in the Lakota community.

The home owners who purchase homes ranging from $700,000 to $1.2 million at the new Carriage Hill development are not the types of families who bring 2.1 children into a school  district seeking to flood the market with a desire to for free babysitting while they work an average job at P & G, climbing up their personal career ladder.  The people looking to purchase homes in Carriage Hill will be successful people in their own right and most likely will find instruction for their children in private schools or tutors and won’t use the services of Lakota anyway—even though like the rest of us without kids in the school, will have to pay for it.

I don’t like the idea of having to spend the next 40 years of my life paying for kids to attend Lakota through my property taxes.  I don’t like the amount I pay now, so an increase is unfathomably ridiculous and I know that the people who invest in communities like Lakota won’t keep their money in the distinct if they find it continuously stolen from them by short term thinking levy supporters.  The fight in the Lakota School District is not over children, it’s over whether or not Lakota becomes the next Fairfield—overrun with Section 8 housing and degraded property value or continues to increase in value like Indian Hill has over the years with managed development and growth.  Chaos and reactive spending will not lead to perpetual prosperity.  The growth of the Lakota district has more to do with residents fleeing high tax communities from around the country than the nice trees and school system that levy supporters believe.  It is low taxes and prosperity that are the most attractive feature to the affluent property owner, and that must be protected if the district wishes to maintain its value in the future.

Lucky for people like Jenni Logan, Ben Dibble, Ray Murray, Linda O’Conner and Randy Oppenheimer the numbers work in their favor at Lakota to not just sustain themselves but survive well into the future maintaining an Excellent with Distinction rating that reflects the community it resides in, even if the most affluent send their kids to private instruction.  I hope they accept the manageable challenge of allowing the enrollment rates to decrease as the tax base stabilizes without asking for further tax dollars.  That would be the responsible thing to do in virtually every facet of community management.  The worst thing they could do is listen to the short sided utterances of their levy hound real-estate agents who want a levy increase to lure in more panicky 30-year-old parents who cry over every drop of spilled milk and perceived threat to their children’s lives who are still children themselves and willing to spend infinite amounts of money on education to compensate for their own internal insecurities as parents.  Those are not the kind of people who should shape the direction of our community for the future.  So a lot rests on how the school management team above handles 2013 at the Lakota School District and the numbers that are now known before them.

We’ll see………………………………………………

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com

Why the Government is Buying so much Ammunition: A repeat of the Jesse James story

I might believe what the Department of Homeland Security is saying, as well as the FBI, ATF, and many other government departments if I didn’t see for the first time in my life an ammunition shortage for .223 ammunition, .45 caliber ammunition, and even bricks of .22 long rifle ammunition at my local gun suppliers.  Their suggestions at The Department of Homeland Security are that their requests for 26.1 million rounds of ammunition that is drying up the supply of ammunition for the rest of America is “normal,” and is strictly for the training of officers.  Read an article about this issue at the link below.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/07/homeland-security-soliciting-bids-for-26-1-million-rounds-of-ammunition/

Combine the ammunition grab with frequent training drills where the participants have been writing home to their mothers about military endeavors in the National Guard and Coast Guard over martial law simulations and the ammunition shortage is quite alarming confirming what many of us already suspect—that at the end of the tunnel there will be a war of some kind that is of a civil nature, not external—and government departments are stocking up to lunch their offensive against the American people.

For me the passage of the NDAA Act was the final straw when it comes to government growth and domestic intrusion.  CLICK HERE FOR REVIEW.  It will be noted for the record that my approach to school levies and even Tea Party activity changed after that passage at the start of the year 2012.  A new strategy needed to emerge as a result—a more aggressive one.  The NDAA Act gives permission for the President to designate a person like me as a terrorist because I participate in what they might consider derision of the public through my writing, and with no due process the might of the American military can arrest, or even assassinate domestic terrorist suspects with the stroke of the president’s pen.  That is too far and flies in the face of what the Fifth Amendment stands for.   Personally when it comes to the United States Constitution I’m far to the right of the Federalists who made up the Constitution.  I fall under the political mantra of the Anti-Federalists who constructed the Bill of Rights, so those first ten Amendments mean a lot to me, and the violation of the Fifth, the Second, the First, the Tenth as all Federal employees violate daily concerns me greatly.  The NDAA Act for me was the final indicator that the Federal Government plans aggressive action against the American citizens.  The ammunition buy up is just confirmation of that suspicion.

I do not worry about the theory of such a confrontation that seems to be emerging rapidly.  Anything could trigger martial law in the United States which would be the first step in that process.  China is poking Japan as we speak for war which would force The United States to pick sides.  Do we pick the long time ally of Japan or the holder of our debt—China?  Whoever we pick will have a lasting economic impact that will touch the lives of every American, which is why China has not went to war with Japan yet—because they can’t afford it.  But they want it–that is for sure.  Such an example is just one of the many possible circumstances that could destroy the value of the American dollar over night plunging The United States into another Civil War, as the government seeks to protect themselves from the wrath of the American people who wake up one morning with the bank calling in their mortgages, and themselves jobless because the value of everything has just flown out the window.  That may sound extreme but it simply describes one possible scenario that could befall a nation with a national debt of over 16 trillion dollars.  If something goes wrong, the government has to have a plan B, which is why they are conducting martial law drills—to protect themselves from the wrath of mismanagement.  I read a book titled Jesse James: Last Rebel of the Civil War by T.J. Stiles a number of years ago and found that I understood Jesse James fight against the Federal government when the South surrendered but James and his brother refused to submit.  Sure they were outlaws and they crossed the lines of justice many times when they robbed banks and harmed civilians in their plights of plunder—but I did understand the tactics and the politics very well.  And I can see a day when a new Jesse James will ride again maybe as the first rebel of the next Civil War.  After all it is the victor of such confrontations that gets to write the interpretation of history, and I will match my ability to write history against anyone that sides with the Federal Government these days.  We’ll see which history the future remembers most—I’ll take that bet.

The more concerning question that comes to my mind is not what these government agencies are doing with so much ammunition—but why am I paying for it?   Why should I as a tax payer be forced to purchase ammunition that most likely will be used against me in some future war within the states?  Why should I help fund a political entity that wants to destroy me?  That doesn’t seem right, or tactically sound.  Heck, I don’t think I should have to fund the agents of Homeland Security who were built under George Bush to compensate for all the fools who screwed up on 9/11 and allowed a terrorist attack on American soil.  Bush created a whole new branch of government in these Homeland Security employees and now the ridiculous TSA agents who are now unionized.  I don’t even support the government passions that were created under George Bush let alone millions of rounds of ammunition to train them how to shoot a gun—which is expensive.  Chances are, when our current socialist president uses the NDAA Act to declare martial law over some made up crises like a major snow storm, or even another school shooting like Sandy Hook, it will be my tax dollars working against me and my fellow Anti-Federalists—making my job harder, and that doesn’t make any sense.

But surrender or passive compliance is not an option—just as a disclaimer right out of the gate. The mountains of ammunition that the government is hording to me are just another waste of money by a band of legalized thieves hell-bent on the destruction of American sovereignty.  I don’t think they should be able to use my tax money to purchase one round of 9 mm ammunition let alone millions.  I can do more with that one round than any 100 of their Federal agents so if we are all fighting over ammunition supply and the goal is the defense of our country from foreign aggression, terrorism, and the like, then me and my kind should be the ones to have it, not The Department of Homeland Security.  The DOH shouldn’t even exist as far as I am concerned and that goes for the Department of Socialist Education either.  They do little good for America but give inflated salaries to worthless employees. But that is the Anti-Federalist in me talking—the kind of Anti-Federalist who founded America, not the kind that plans terrorism, or acts of sedition that are unpatriotic to the cause of liberty and freedom—no matter how much the secular progressives who make up modern Federalism might attempt to portray it through their puppet media.

I laid out my thoughts about a modern Jesse James story in my book Tail of the Dragon, and what justification might be behind the kind of activity I’m speaking of where a civil war of a modern kind might break out leaving us all fighting for the same ammunition.  Next to most secular progressives these days they think of people like George Washington and Alexander Hamilton as radical fringe Constitutionalists who lack a worldly view of things.  But to me, Washington and Hamilton represented Federalism in a reckless fashion of big government and gradual encroachment of liberty.  I am a Jefferson Anti-Federalist from that era, and I have little faith that anybody in a government position of any kind can do anything right, let alone detect real threats against America from perceived threats who hold Anti-Federalist views against a Federalist system.  I especially don’t trust a president who went to school in Indonesia to sign a paper turning my tax dollars against American Anti-Federalists out of convenience and self-preservation while buying millions of rounds of ammunition with our money to launch the offensive.

Such behavior seems like it should be against the law—but then look at who we’re talking about here.  When criminals write the law—I suppose anything can happen.  But I will say that when it does, I will not allow what happened to the memory of Jesse James to happen to the current Anti-Federalists.  Learning from history, the next time there is an armed conflict between factions of political interest in America, the Federalists will not have the stronger use of the pen to paint history in the light they desire.  They may find that they can buy up all the ammunition making me drive around town to find what I need—which pisses me off—but in the end, the victor gets to define history and the next time it won’t be those like Jesse James that gets painted as the outlaw.

Rich Hoffman

“If they attack first………..blast em’!”

www.tailofthedragonbook.com